Hasan Akin, Zeynep Aytac, Fatma Ayancik, Ece Ozkaya, Emre Arioz, Kutay Celebioglu, Selin Aradag TOBB University of Economics and Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering Sogutozu, Ankara, 06560, Turkey (hakin@etu.edu.tr)
AbstractFrancis type turbines are commonly used in hydropower generation. Spiral case, stay vanes, guide vanes, runner and draft tube are the main components of the turbine. Available net head and discharge values determine the initial dimensions of these parts according to theoretical and experimental data. In this study, a design methodology is described to optimize the design by integrating in-house Matlab codes and commercial CFD codes. CFD is widely used to solve complex three-dimensional (3D) flows occurring in these types of turbo machines. This paper discusses the basic principles of a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) aided design methodology applied to Francis turbines. Keywords-computational fluid dynamics; CFD; Francis turbine; turbine design I. INTRODUCTION Today, hydropower is the most important renewable energy source among the other sources for Turkey and all other countries around the world. Hydraulic turbines are used for hydro-power generation. Hydraulic turbines produce approximately one fifth of the total electricity in the world (World Energy Council, 2006). Their efficiencies can rise up to 95% and hydraulic turbines generate electricity with a minimum amount of pollution. In addition, they have a great energy storing capability and are able to meet the daily changing electricity demand. [1] Hydraulic turbines are basically classified in two groups; impulse and reaction turbines. Impulse turbines work based on the momentum principle. Water hits the runner blades in the form of a water jet and this impact causes a force on the runner which causes the runner to turn [2]. Pelton turbine is an example of impulse turbines. In reaction turbines, the flow is fully pressurized through the turbine. The potential energy of water is converted to kinetic energy by a velocity rise. It uses the action-reaction principle. Examples of reaction turbines are Francis and Kaplan type turbines [3]. Francis turbines are applicable to a wide range of head (from 64 m to 700 m) and specific speed (from 51 rpm to 250 rpm) values. Their wide range of applicability and easier structural design makes Francis turbines more advantageous than other hydraulic turbines [4]. The main components of a Francis turbine are spiral case, stay vanes, guide vanes, runner and draft tube; which are illustrated in Fig. 1.
Figure 1. The main components of a Francis turbine Spiral case distributes the flow radially around stay vanes in a uniform manner. It converts the pressure head into velocity head. The cross-sectional area of the spiral case decreases uniformly along the circumference in order to keep the fluid velocity constant along its way through the stay vanes. Stay vanes provide the flow to distribute in a uniform manner with minimum hydraulic losses. In addition, they ensure the structural strength by connecting the upper and the lower ring. After leaving the stay vanes, the fluid reaches the guide vanes which distribute the flow around the runner. The guide vanes direct the fluid on to the runner blades at the appropriate angle by rotating about their axis. They are the only devices available to control the ow and thus the power output of a Francis turbine [5]. Flow directed by the guide vanes hits the runner blades. With the effect of this impulse, the turbine generator shaft starts to rotate which enables the production of electricity. Water leaves the runner at a minimum pressure, once it releases its energy. Draft tube provides a connection between the runner exit and the tailwater level. Throughout this path, draft tube increases the water pressure. The cross-sectional area of the draft tube increases along the way to the tailwater in This project is supported by Turkish Ministry of Development. order to provide the deceleration of water with minimum hydraulic losses and with maximum pressure recovery [6]. Developing technology enhanced the computational power and led to the improvement of turbine design. An accurate prediction of flow inside the hydraulic turbine is nowadays possible by the use of state-of-the-art CFD tools [7], [8]. CFD codes solving either Euler or RANS formulations evolved over time and yielded good results [9]. The test results obtained from experiments usually match up with CFD results. Today, it is possible to determine the turbine performance using CFD tools. CFD tools include 3D codes involving Euler equations followed by codes involving Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations [10], [11]. This study discusses the design and optimization process of an entire Francis turbine for a specific case. Firstly, the steps of the design methodology are stated and then criteria to decide whether the design is optimal or not are explained. II. DESIGN METHODOLOGY A. General Design Methodology Each hydropower project needs a different hydraulic turbine design. To make the design process easier, a general methodology, which is the same for each component was previously developed by Okyay [6] as shown in Fig. 2.
Figure 2. Design methodology [6]
The process starts with the preliminary design which is based on the net head value available at the turbine inlet and the discharge in the system. The in-house Matlab codes are used for the determination of the initial dimensions. The codes include some theoretical formulae for parameters of each component. These theoretical design parameters of the components do not always provide the required turbine performance, as unexpected flow behavior such as flow separation and/or cavitation may occur which the codes cannot take into account. As a result, CFD tools are used to optimize the geometrical parameters by simulating the flow throughout the turbine. This process is an iterative procedure and it continues until the required turbine parameters are obtained. When the requested conditions are fulfilled, the manufacturing step starts. B. CFD Methodology ANSYS v.11 CFX Solver is used for the CFD analysis. Because of the large computation time and effort of whole turbine analysis, each component is simulated separately to validate its initial design. The turbulent flow inside the turbine is modeled by using k- and SST models. k- turbulence model is mainly used in the turbine design, whereas SST turbulence model is performed for runner simulations. Mathematically modeled geometries are meshed separately. Stay vanes, guide vanes and the runner are meshed with H/J/C/L Grid using TurboGrid module, whereas the spiral case and the draft tube are meshed using hexahedral mesh elements. After the meshing process, pressure inlet and mass flow outlet boundary conditions are given for all component simulations in CFX module. The design process begins with the spiral case. The initial dimensions are obtained using the in-house Matlab codes which use the theoretical Law of constancy of the velocity moment through the spiral case. Spiral case is modeled using a computer aided design (CAD) program for the selected wicket gate height, runner diameter and predicted outflow angle. Spiral case is redesigned using CFD results, until the flow is distributed uniformly around the stay vanes. The outlet conditions of the spiral case are used as the inlet conditions of the stay vanes. Stay vane and guide vane geometries are constructed based on theoretical formulations and experience using the BladeGen module. The optimization process continues until the correct flow angles and minimum hydraulic losses are obtained. In addition, the outlet conditions of the stay vane are used as the inlet conditions of the guide vane. Also, the outlet conditions of the guide vane are used as the inlet conditions of the runner. The initial dimensions of the rotational component of the turbine, runner, is determined using the in-house Matlab codes which are prepared from theoretical formulations that are based on the specific speed of the turbine. Runner is modeled with the BladeGen module and analyzed with the solver for rotational components. Main target values are the runner efficiency and runner shaft power. Also cavitation should not occur on runner blades. After the runner blade geometry is optimized with CFD, runner solid model is created with the CAD program. The analyses are carried out for a single blade to avoid high computational costs. The inlet conditions of the draft tube are obtained from the outlet conditions of the runner. Initial draft tube dimensions are determined from the outlet diameter of the runner and also from the alignment of Francis turbine. Draft tube pressure recovery factor and flow behavior are also investigated. The draft tube performance is described by pressure recovery factor. Finally, after individual analyses are carried out for each component, tandem cascade analyses (spiral case + stay vane, stay vane + guide vane, spiral case + stay vane + guide vane) are performed in order to improve the accuracy of the simulations. III. RESULTS The methodology developed is applied for the design of turbines of Yuvacik H.E.P.P in Turkey, zmit. Two identical horizontal Francis type turbines are required. The plant capacity is 2.3 MW. The net head and the system discharge are necessary input variables. Yuvacik hydropower plant has a net head of 45 m and the total design discharge is 5 m 3 /s. As both turbines are of the same type and have the same properties, the design head and discharge are 45 m and 2 m 3 /s per turbine; since the two turbines are in operation at the same time. Design head and discharge values indicate that horizontal shaft Francis type turbines based on the turbine selection charts are suitable. Below, the important CFD results of the final design of each component are given. A. Spiral Case The equal distribution of the water around the runner is significant for a balanced operation of the turbine. As plotted in Fig.3, the radial flow velocity has a uniform distribution at the outlet of the spiral case. The same behavior is observed in the pressure distribution on the spiral mid-plane, shown in Fig. 4.
Figure 3. Radial and circumferential velocity distribution at the spiral case outlet
Figure 4. Pressure distribution and velocity vectors on the mid-plane B. Stay Vanes Distribution of the static pressure in the stay vane passage is as shown in Fig. 5. The gradual pressure values between the stay vanes indicate the use of correct inflow and outflow angles. As shown in Fig. 6, the flow is distributed uniformly between stay vanes.
Figure 5. Pressure distribution on the mid-plane
Figure 6. Velocity distribution on the mid-plane C. Guide Vanes The pressure variation between the guide vanes which are assigned a symmetric NACA profile is shown in Fig. 7. The flow is guided with correct angle and minimum hydraulic loss to the runner. Any backflow or flow separation is not observed in flow area between the guide vanes, as shown in Fig. 8.
Figure 7. Pressure distribution on the mid-plane
Figure 8. Velocity distribution on the mid-plane D. Runner A runner efficiency of 97.1 percent is obtained from the final runner simulations, which satisfies the requirements such as the desired power, uniform velocity distribution and cavitation-free blades. Flow separation does not occur because the meridional vectors follow the meridional path as plotted in Fig. 9. The velocity vectors shown in Fig. 10 follow the blade profile throughout the runner passage.
Figure 9. Meridional flow velocity vectors
Figure 10. Velocity distribution on the mid-plane E. Draft Tube The velocity vectors on the mid-plane of the draft tube are plotted, as shown in Fig. 11. The flow moves in a good manner from the inlet of the draft tube through the outlet of the draft tube and no flow separation is detected. According to Fig. 12, the static pressure increases in the flow direction, which is the main role of the draft tube. The pressure recovery factor of the draft tube, which is up to 0.90 for highly efficient draft tubes, is investigated and 0.85 recovery factor is reached for the final design.
Figure 11. Velocity vectors on symmetry plane
Figure 12. Pressure distribution on symmetry plane IV. CONCLUSION The developed design methodology is applied for the turbine design of an actual hydropower project. The overall results of the each Francis-type turbine components designed with the help of CFD are presented in Table I. According to the final CFD results, an overall turbine efficiency of 92.3% is reached. As the performance values of the design satisfy the requirements of the Yuvacik H.E.P.P project, the structural verification of the design is accomplished and the manufacturing process was started. The assembly of the designed Francis turbine is shown in Fig. 13. TABLE I. GENERAL PERFORMANCE VALUES OF THE DESIGN Spiral Case Stay Vanes Guide Vanes Runner Draft Tube Performance (Efficiency)
0.98 0.998 0.994 0.971 Cp=0.85 H (m) 1.03 0.1 0.31 43.753 - Leakage Loss 1.5% Total Efficiency 92.3% Design Head 45 m Design Discharge (1 unit) 2.5 m 3 /s Shaft Power (1 Unit) 1150 kW
Figure 13. The assembly of the designed Francis turbine ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors would like to thank to TEMSAN (Turkish Electromechanical Industry) and Su-Ener Engineering Inc. for their help and support. The computations are performed at TOBB ETU Center for Hydro Energy Research, CFD Laboratory.
REFERENCES [1] B. Daniel Marjavaara, CFD driven optimization of hydraulic turbine draft tubes using surrogate models,Doctoral Thesis, Depertmant of Applied Physics and Mechanical Engineering, Lulea University of Technology, Porsn, Sweeden, 2006. [2] Munson, Young, Okiishi and Huebsch, Fundementals of Fluid Mechanics, 6 th ed. Asia: Wiley, 2010, ch.12. [3] G.I. Krivchenko, Hydraulic Machines: Turbines and Pumps; Moscow: Mir Publishers, 1986. [4] J. Raabe, Hydropower: The Design, Use, and Function of Hydromechanical, Hydraulic, and Electrical Equipment, VDI-Verlag, Verlag des Vereins Deutscher Ingenieure, Dsseldorf, 1985. [5] P. Drtina and M. Sallaberger, Hydraulic turbinesbasic principles and state-of-the art computational fluid dynamics applications, in Proc. of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 213(C), 1999, pp.85-102. [6] G. Okyay, Utilization of CFD tools in the design process of a Francis turbine Master Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, METU, Ankara, Turkey, 2010. [7] H. Keck, P. Drtina, M. Sick, Numerical hill chart prediction by means of CFD stage simulation for a complete Francis turbine, in Proc. XVIII IAHR Symposium, Valencia, 1996. [8] M.Keller, CFD of unsteady phenomena in water turbines, presented at 24 th CADFEM User's Meeting, Berlin, 2006. [9] H. Keck and M. Sick, Thirty years of numerical flow simulation in hydraulic turbomachines, in Proc. Acta Mechanica, 201, 2009, pp.21- 229. [10] T. Suzuki, "Flow behaviour around stay vanes and guide vanes of a Francis turbine," in Proc. ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering, 118, 1996, pp.110-115. [11] J. Wu, et al., "CFD-based design optimization for hydro turbines," in Proc. ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering, 129, 2007, pp. 159-168.