100%(1)100% нашли этот документ полезным (1 голос)
88 просмотров4 страницы
White' s book is one such work that makes a significant contribution to our understanding and knowledge of Tantra. Doniger sees White' s work as'flying in the face of the revisionist Hindu hermeneutic tradition' Malhotra's scathing attack on both of them is based on the lack of adequate proof.
White' s book is one such work that makes a significant contribution to our understanding and knowledge of Tantra. Doniger sees White' s work as'flying in the face of the revisionist Hindu hermeneutic tradition' Malhotra's scathing attack on both of them is based on the lack of adequate proof.
White' s book is one such work that makes a significant contribution to our understanding and knowledge of Tantra. Doniger sees White' s work as'flying in the face of the revisionist Hindu hermeneutic tradition' Malhotra's scathing attack on both of them is based on the lack of adequate proof.
ON WHITE' S TANTRI C SE X- REFLECTIONS IN THE SOUTH ASIAN CONTEXT DAVID GORDON WHI TE, Ki ss o f t he YoginL ' Tantric Sex ' in its Sout h Asi an Cont ext s u~vl~srlY OF C~CAX) PIt~SS, 2003 Review by Jayant Bapat Monash University, Australia JBapat@optusnet. com. au Even though there are notable writings on Tantra by authors such as Padoux, Goudriaan, Gupta, Sanderson and others, a new serious, critical and academic work on Tantra is always a welcome addition. White' s book is one such work that makes a significant contribution to our understanding and knowledge of Tantra. It has also raised a controversy, and it is this latter aspect that prompts me to write this note. As I was about to embark on writing a review on this book for the Journal of South Asian Studies, Australia, I came across a glowing review of it, accompanied by a diatribe against Hindutva [the Hindu Right], by Wendy Doniger in the The Times Literary Supplement I and an extraordinary repartee to it by Rajiv Malhotra of the Infinity Foundation on the Suklekha webpage which was then re-posted on RISA-L network. In a nutshell, Doniger sees White' s work as ' flying in the face of the revisionist Hindu hermeneutic tradition' , which to her, and to White, began in the 1 lth century with Abhinavagupta brahminising Tantra. Before that, according to her and White, Tantra was essentially a subaltern protestant practice. Rajiv Malhotra's scathing attack on both of them is based on the lack of adequate proof in White' s assertions about the origin of Tantra and on the attempts by these two, especially Doniger, to bring in current Hindu chauvinism into the discussion. I believe it is appropriate, nay, essential, to mention my credentials before I embark on my remarks. I arrived in Australia 40 years ago and have taught Organic Chemistry at Monash University for over 30 years. During this time I have also been a lay Hindu priest and hence a practitioner of the right handed Tantra. I hold a doctorate in Religious Studies as well. Currently I am engaged in understanding and extending an important work on Lajjagauri by a Marathi scholar, Dr. R.C. Dhere. Iconized as a nude and headless female figure in the birth giving position (uttanapada), Lajjagauri has been identified by White as a Yogini in his book (pp. 115 and 116). My interest in this area has made it incumbent upon me to read the literature on goddess worship. 126 JAYANT BAPAT White's main argument is embedded in chapter 8 of his work. In this chapter, he hypothesizes the transformation of the Tantra from a folk based ritual, which involved physically donating bodily substances to the chosen goddesses in order to acquire supernatural powers, to an internalization, aestheticization and semanticization of Kaula practice (a change from doing to knowing) by Brahminic Hinduism. He argues that by doing this, which he terms overcoding, Brahmins were able to marginalize Kaula practices and transform them into a body of ritual and meditative techniques, which permitted the average householders to use them as well. Yogini circles of the folk tradition were internalized, transformed into chakras of Hathayogic practice. Yoginis themselves were semanticized into seed mantras and finally ritual substitutes were introduced for the bodily fluids. The main theoreticians responsible for this change were Abhinavagupta and his disciple Kshemaraja. White has titled this chapter ' The Sublimation of the Yogini' and writes that the language of phonemes and photemes, mantras and yantras made it possible for practitioners of high Hindu trantra to discuss in abstract terms palatable to the higher tradition, what was and remains at the bottom, a sexual body of practice. In other words, to White, the original Tantra was little but sex and the consumption of bodily fluids in order to acquire supernatural powers. That White has done painstaking research in this esoteric and difficult area, there is no doubt. I believe this is the first time someone has shown the real significance behind the large mithuna sculptures that adorn the Tantric Khajuraho temples. By translating many previously unknown works, White has certainly made an original contribution to our knowledge of Tantra. By a detailed study of these Sanskrit texts, and by use of historical evidence, White has tried to support his main argument about the transformation of Tantra. However, I take issue with his conclusions. White's assertion that there was 'an original Kaula tradition' prevalent only in the folk tradition within India is speculative. As my colleague, John Dupuche, the author of the important new work, The Kula Ri t ual , 2 comments, 'it has been only a growing and changing tradition'. The branding of Abhinavagupta as someone who packaged the tantric path for the consumption of a leisurely Kashmiri populace shows a singular lack of understanding of the Brahmanic scholarly tradition. An examination of chapter 29 of Abhinavagupta's Tantaloka would leave no doubt in anyone's mind that he certainly did not shy away from describing and using bodily fluids. It is true that many Tantric practices were an anathema to some of the writers of Dharmashastras and attempts were no doubt made to whitewash Tantrism. However, like other examples in Hinduism, here also there is a OF YOGINIS AND TANTRIKSTERS 127 measure of exchange between the folk tradition and the higher Brahmanic tradition. Universalization and parochialization are not confi ned to India; and so the paradigm of Brahmanic appropriation must be used with caution. One must never forget that behind most rituals practised ever since the beginning of Hindu ritualistic tradition in Brahmanic Hinduism, there is necessarily a folk element. The Brahmins as ritualists have lived with it and still pursued their ' Structuralist' scholarship. (It seems to me that the Brahmin, M.N. Srinivas, has done a disservice by coining the culture-bound term ' Sanskritization' .) What concerns me and makes me distinctly unhappy are the efforts by White and mainly by Doniger to bring the Hindutva debate into this discussion. I am sure Doniger, no doubt a great scholar, certainly knows that the wider Hindutva battle has not yet been won as can be seen from the recent Indian elections. Although relevant to Indology and Sociology, discussion about Hindutva needs to be kept in perspective. Extrapolating Abhinavagupta' s work to level criticism at 19th century Indian scholars and the current Hindutva advocates seems far-fetched. Also, I believe Abhinavagupta as an insider, had every right to interpret whatever he saw into Hindu religiosity. To me, he built Tantra elements together into a metaphysical and rational system of thought. Imputing sociological motives to an eleventh century scholar needs a thorough recreation of his life and times. One has to remember that despite the current efforts at Hinduizing the educational system in India, Hinduism has no church and no apostles. All said and done, Brahmins and the high castes are service providers to the laity. The social location of the Brahmins within the secular context is not as high as is taken for granted by most scholars. Sociological scholarship in the last few decades has concentrated on Brahminic hegemony in the intellectual sphere. However, Brahmins are not catholic priests who can excommunicate. They, i f at all, have to work through public opinion, which is governed by folk tradition. Most importantly, by engaging in this kind of ' Vitandavada' , Doniger may well be doing a disservice to White' s scholarship and may not be answering the legitimate anxieties of all the Indian scholars. May I gently remind her that it took a non-European scholar, Said, to point to an important fact of enlightenment scholarship, Orientalism. I found White' s book serious and interesting. What he fails to see however is the fact that sex and metaphysics, i.e. Abhinavagupta' s interpretations, do not have to be diametrically opposed. Drinking of sexual fluids has a ritualistic but also a metaphysical and even philosophical element associated with it. The fluids are certainly not foods. 128 JAYANT BAPAT From a distance, while I can understand Malhotra' s eagerness to j oi n the battle, I find it intemperate. Let us respond to White as he deserves. I fi nd it strange that the TLS should publish Doniger' s review. Endnotes 1. 'Tantricbodies',byWendyDoniger, TheEmesLitemrySupplement,20 May 2004, http://www.the-tls.co.uk/this_week/story.aspx?story_id=2107312. 2. John R. Dupuche, Abhinavagupta: The Kula Ritual As Elaborated in Chapter 29 of the Tantraloka (Delhi, Motilal Banarasidass, 2003).