Contextual - Historical Criticism: This approach seeks to understand a
literary work by investigating the social, cultural, and intellectual context that produced ita context that necessarily includes the artists biography and milieu. A key goal for historical critics is to understand the effect of a literary work upon its original readers.
2. A. Formalism- The artists visual language consists of formal elements. These create the aesthetic effects, and include line, shape, space, color, light, and dark. The formal elements can be further specified to include balance, order, proportion, perspective, medium, pattern, and rhythm. Architecture and sculpture require added formal elements such as mass, volume, and texture. The final arrangement of these items is the composition, and each element contributes to the overall impression created by the work. An example of the use of the formal element color can be seen in Picassos Blue Period painting called The Old Guitarist. According to Laurie Schneider Adams, color can often be the most visually striking of the elements. Simply from examining the ways color is used in our language, it is impossible to avoid its emotionally associative quality. This painting is monochromatic with the domination of blue, and thus a depressive overtone. Aesthetic appeal is said to exist partially in the relationship between mood created by the blue and the other formal elements of the painting. The figure is thin and bony, though without much sense of mass. He is composed mostly of downward curves, and seems stretched and worn. The silvery light reinforces an eerie quality. Formalist Criticism: This approach regards literature as a unique form of human knowledge that needs to be examined on its own terms. All the elements necessary for understanding the work are contained within the work itself. Of particular interest to the formalist critic are the elements of formstyle, structure, tone, imagery, etc.that are found within the text. A primary goal for formalist critics is to determine how such elements work together with the texts content to shape its effects upon readers. B. Psychological - Psychoanalysis is a complex methodology, which is fairly controversial to some for its ever-flexible elements and what some might call fictive results. However the appeal is also understandable, integrated with aspects of Iconographic methods, Feminism, Marxism, and Semiotics. It also deals with psychobiography, which examines an artists psychological development as it relates to their art. The underlying purpose of psychoanalysis is to deal with the unconscious significance of works of art. This involves discussion of the work of art, the artist, aesthetic response of the viewer, and the cultural context. The appropriate historical beginning is with Freud. He was perfectly aware of the cultural aspects of his exploration of psychoanalysis, relating it to archaeology as early as 1896. As applied to works of art, imagery is the active and joining factor. Dreams, daydreams, fantasies, and neurotic symptoms all involve imagery, and psychoanalysis attempts interpretation. Freud believed the artists reason for creation did not involve the seeking of beauty, form, or disinteredness. It was instead a desire for gratification. Art in this way was to serve as therapeutic, capable of offering both the artist and the spectator consolation and solace from a troubled reality. From the words of Freud: An artist is once more in rudiments an introvert, not far removed from neurosis. He is oppressed by excessively powerful instinctual needs. He desires to win honour, power, wealth, fame, and the love of women; but lacks the means for achieving these satisfactions. Consequently, like any other unsatisfied man, he turns away from reality and transfers all his interest, and his libido too, to the wishful constructions of his life of phantasy, when the path might lead to neurosishe *the artist+ understands how to work over his daydreams in such a way as to make them lose what is too personal about them and repels strangers, and to make it possible for others to share in the enjoyment of them Freud took an interest in Leonardo da Vinci and developed theories about him and his work in a book. He drew from documents telling of Leonardos childhood. His biological mother was a peasant, but his father married another woman who remained childless. After the age of five, Leonardo lived in his fathers household with his stepmother and paternal grandmother. Freud concluded that Leonard must have been kept from his biological mother by his stepmother. Because of this, Freud believed Leonardo formed as unusually desirous relationship to his biological mother. Using these conclusions and information, Freud analyzed Leonardos painting Madonna, Child, and St. Anne. St. Anne is the representation of Leonardos biological mother, who is separated from the Christ child (Leonardo) by Mary (stepmother). St. Annes smile is envious of the stepmother and blissful at the same time, as she is near her child. Freud goes further to explain that Leonardo as an adult remained abstinent, though latently homosexual, due to his sublimated desires. He did not have the strength to finish most of his paintings because his energy went to scientific investigation instead, which was a manner of seeking a lost love object. Psychological Criticism: This approach reflects the effect that modern psychology has had upon both literature and literary criticism. Fundamental figures in psychological criticism include Sigmund Freud, whose psychoanalytic theories changed our notions of human behavior by exploring new or controversial areas like wish-fulfillment, sexuality, the unconscious, and repression as well as expanding our understanding of how language and symbols operate by demonstrating their ability to reflect unconscious fears or desires; and Carl Jung, whose theories about the unconscious are also a key foundation of Mythological Criticism. Psychological criticism has a number of approaches, but in general, it usually employs one (or more) of three approaches: An investigation of the creative process of the artist: what is the nature of literary genius and how does it relate to normal mental functions? The psychological study of a particular artist, usually noting how an authors biographical circumstances affect or influence their motivations and/or behavior. The analysis of fictional characters using the language and methods of psychology. C. Biographical method stresses the importance of authorship. It explores an artists life and personality in relation to their work. Social and economic factors play a role, but are secondary. Based on texts relating to the artists life, the artists presence can be identified within their artwork. Biographical Criticism: This approach begins with the simple but central insight that literature is written by actual people and that understanding an authors life can help readers more thoroughly comprehend the work. Hence, it often affords a practical method by which readers can better understand a text. However, a biographical critic must be careful not to take the biographical facts of a writers life too far in criticizing the works of that writer: the biographical critic focuses on explicating the literary work by using the insight provided by knowledge of the authors life.... [B]iographical data should amplify the meaning of the text, not drown it out with irrelevant material.
3. A. Marxism is the most recent methodology to consider the economic and social context of art. To a certain extent Marxism can be understood as a reaction against formalism. Marxism began with Karl Marx in the nineteenth century.
Marx believed that the exact cultural conditions an artwork was created in would have to be reproduced for an accurate analysis. He opposed the nineteenth century aesthetic of art for arts sake, as well as formal approaches, since they failed to account for moral, social, and economic factors involved in the making and selling of art.
As for the production of art, Marx focused on the artist as working class, exploited by the ruling class. This he explored according to nineteenth century capitalism. Because of such treatment, the artist is said to become alienated from their own artwork as it stands as a commodity. So, they can feel they have lost contact with a part of themselves.
Some Marxists exploring art took a heightened and particularly active political position. From the Notebooks, 1935-39, of German playwright Bertolt Brecht, one finds he felt imagery had a moral obligation to convey a social message. He believed the wolves of his time were the only ones with money enough to buy paintings, however, in the future these paintings would still show what these men had been. And in that way they could contribute to future change.
One of the most significant Marxist art historians is Frederick Antal. He analyzed the Last Judgment scene in the Arena Chapel in Padua. The frescoes in the chapel were painted for Enrico Scrovegni, the towns wealthiest man because of his fathers usury. His father had been consigned to hell by Dante for such behavior. So, Enrico used this commission to ensure his own salvation.
GIOTTO di Bondone (b. 1267, Vespignano, d. 1337, Firenze) Last Judgment (detail) 1306 Fresco, 1000 x 840 cm (full fresco) Cappella Scrovegni (Arena Chapel), Padua Below the cross, on the left, is the dedicatory scene, in which Enrico Scrovegnikne
In the Last Judgment, Erico is present in the painting. He is known kneeling on the side of the saved as he presents a model of the chapel to three angels. Enricos gesture implies that he is presenting a gift.
Antal reads this scene as a reflection of the rational humanism of the time. This would explain why the chapel, also containing images of the Passion, would not include some of the more spiritual scenes, such as Agony in the Garden, the Temptation, and the Journey to Emmaus. Tension is externalized instead of showing inner spiritual conflicts.
It is suggested that the style of the artist, Giotto, whose figures are very solid and in obeyance of the laws of gravity, emphasize the rational, human, and psychological.
Sociological Criticism: This approach examines literature in the cultural, economic and political context in which it is written or received, exploring the relationships between the artist and society. Sometimes it examines the artists society to better understand the authors literary works; other times, it may examine the representation of such societal elements within the literature itself. One influential type of sociological criticism is Marxist criticism, which focuses on the economic and political elements of art, often emphasizing the ideological content of literature; because Marxist criticism often argues that all art is political, either challenging or endorsing (by silence) the status quo, it is frequently evaluative and judgmental, a tendency that can lead to reductive judgment, as when Soviet critics rated Jack London better than William Faulkner, Ernest Hemingway, Edith Wharton, and Henry James, because he illustrated the principles of class struggle more clearly. Nonetheless, Marxist criticism can illuminate political and economic dimensions of literature other approaches overlook.
B. Feminism has been one of the most effective methodologies practiced. It became a significant movement in the 1970s. Gender has become an essential element in the understanding of creation, content, and evaluation of art. Feminists have been interested in topics expanded beyond gender as well, finding kinship with aspects of Marxism and Semiotics that stress cultural context. According to Griselda Pollock, to be successful, Feminists need to be interested in revealing the biases of art history as a whole and not just concerning women.
Feminists have been instrumental in recovering information about contributions of women artists and patrons that have not received deserved attention by previous historians. They have discussed the ways women have been discriminated against as artists and art subjects. The question has been raised Why have there been no great women artists? So to dismiss this question, it has been essential for Feminists to provide evidence of this discrimination as well as argue against the idea of inborn artistic genius. Linda Nochlin pointed out that many women artists came from artistic families or fathers who had trained them.
For much the same reason, Feminists believe crafts developed a status below fine art because of their association with women. They stress that gender has influenced this interpretation of history, not for biological reasons, but those social and cultural.
With the beginning of the academy, with a very few exceptions, women were excluded. It was not acceptable for women to have access to nude models. So there could be no accurate anatomy study. And it is legitimate, based on writing from the artists themselves, to say that demands of the family ended many artistic endeavors.
Feminists argue that women as art subjects have either been shown as passive or negative figures. Titians Venus of Urbino is a perfect example of the objectification of women through the invite of a certain male gaze. The beautiful woman has also been shown as a threat and corruptor. Frau Welt on the exterior of Mainnz Cathedral in Germany is one such figure. She is beautiful from the front, but her back is covered with sores and ulcers, crowded with frogs and snakes.
On a more positive side, attention has been brought to patrons such as queen of France, Jeanne dEvreux and noble woman Isabella dEste. This attention also included artists such as medieval nuns who were illuminators, Renaissance and Baroque painters and sculptors, and Dutch still-life painters.
There has been much question of the traditional canons. Prior to the 1970s, women artists were excluded from major art history survey books. An example of the lessened seriousness and importance given to female artists is the Portrait of Mlle. Charlotte du Val dOgnes. It is part of the New York Metropolitan Museum of Art collection, and was attributed to Jacques-Louis David. The painting was hailed by critics as a remarkable portrait. Later the work was re-attributed to artist Constance Marie Charpentier. It suddenly acquired feminine attributes: Its poetry, literary rather than plastic, its very evident charms, and cleverly concealed weakness, its ensemble made up from thousands of subtle attitudes, all seem to reveal the feminine spirit.
C. Gender Criticism: This approach examines how sexual identity influences the creation and reception of literary works. Originally an offshoot of feminist movements, gender criticism today includes a number of approaches, including the so-called masculinist approach recently advocated by poet Robert Bly. The bulk of gender criticism, however, is feminist and takes as a central precept that the patriarchal attitudes that have dominated western thought have resulted, consciously or unconsciously, in literature full of unexamined male- produced assumptions. Feminist criticism attempts to correct this imbalance by analyzing and combatting such attitudesby questioning, for example, why none of the characters in Shakespeares play Othello ever challenge the right of a husband to murder a wife accused of adultery. Other goals of feminist critics include analyzing how sexual identity influences the reader of a text and examin[ing] how the images of men and women in imaginative literature reflect or reject the social forces that have historically kept the sexes from achieving total equality.
D. Post modernism Iconography is a methodology involving examination of the subject matter of works of art. The focus is on content rather than form, and some art historians have chosen to ignore form entirely in their analyses. The members of the Warburg Institute are especially known for their iconographic approach. The leading member was Erwin Pankofsky.
Pankofsky divided Iconography into three levels. The first he called pre- iconographic, or the primary level of subject matter. At the second level, text underlies the image. These lead to the third, which provides the intrinsic meaning of the image, taking into account time and place where the image was made, prevailing cultural style or the style of a particular artist, and the wishes of the patron. This level should involve information from outside sources and texts.
To provide an iconographic reading of Te tamari no atua, by Paul Gauguin, the pre-iconographic reading would start with the woman lying on a bed with her eyes closed. A cat sleeps at her feet. Next to the bed another woman is holding a baby, and just behind her is a winged figure. Further into the background are animals under a shed. The next step is recognizing the reference to the Nativity of Christ. This is verified knowing that Gauguin spent the last years of his life merging Christian scenes with his Tahitian subjects. Further exploration reveals the cat at the foot of the bed to be a likely reference to Manets Olympia, especially knowing that Gauguin kept a photograph of the painting in his hut. The presence of the cat then associates the women on the bed with prostitution. She was actually G auguins mistress, described as a slovenly, lazy young woman of dubious moral character, by Gauguins art student in Tahiti.
Semiotics involves the application of the science of signs, or semiology. It has been divided into three art history methodologies, which include Structuralism, Post-Structuralism, and Deconstruction (will be discussed later). Semiotics assumes that all cultural expression is composed of signs.
Deconstruction is a methodology formed to challenge modernist views. It attempts to take apart worldviews associated with modernism, such as equality, liberty, God, and self, claiming them to be intellectual constructions rather than naturally present. This is elaborated to include questions about the creators of the constructions, their motives, and their purpose.