0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
21 просмотров3 страницы
Monopoly power is the degree of power a seller has to set prices. It arises from factors like market demand elasticity, the number of firms in the market, and the interaction between firms. Sources of monopoly power include:
1) Elasticity of market demand - Less elastic demand gives more power to influence prices. Demand for necessities like oil is fairly inelastic in the short run.
2) Number of firms in the market - More firms means it's less likely any one can affect prices significantly. Monopoly power falls as the number of firms increases.
3) Interaction between firms - Even with just a few firms, if rivalry is aggressive with each trying to capture market share by under
Monopoly power is the degree of power a seller has to set prices. It arises from factors like market demand elasticity, the number of firms in the market, and the interaction between firms. Sources of monopoly power include:
1) Elasticity of market demand - Less elastic demand gives more power to influence prices. Demand for necessities like oil is fairly inelastic in the short run.
2) Number of firms in the market - More firms means it's less likely any one can affect prices significantly. Monopoly power falls as the number of firms increases.
3) Interaction between firms - Even with just a few firms, if rivalry is aggressive with each trying to capture market share by under
Monopoly power is the degree of power a seller has to set prices. It arises from factors like market demand elasticity, the number of firms in the market, and the interaction between firms. Sources of monopoly power include:
1) Elasticity of market demand - Less elastic demand gives more power to influence prices. Demand for necessities like oil is fairly inelastic in the short run.
2) Number of firms in the market - More firms means it's less likely any one can affect prices significantly. Monopoly power falls as the number of firms increases.
3) Interaction between firms - Even with just a few firms, if rivalry is aggressive with each trying to capture market share by under
Roll No: - 97 Class: - 1 st Semester Sec: - B Subject: - Micro and Macro Economics MME! Colle"e: - #.$. Birla %nstitute $e&artment '( Mana"ement! ).! *hat is mono&ol+ &o,er- *hat are its sources- Ans.! Mono&ol+ &o,er is the de"ree o( &o,er held b+ the seller to set the &rice (or a "ood. A mono&ol+ &o,er is de(ined as the abilit+ o( a business to control a &rice ,ithin its rele.ant &roduct mar/et or its "eo"ra&hic mar/et or to e0clude a com&etitor (rom doin" business ,ithin its rele.ant &roduct mar/et or "eo"ra&hic mar/et. %t is onl+ necessar+ to &ro.e the business had the 1&o,er1 to raise &rices or e0clude com&etitors. 2he &lainti(( does not need to &ro.e that &rices ,ere actuall+ raised or that com&etitors ,ere actuall+ e0cluded (rom the mar/et. the less elastic the demand cur.e3 the more mono&ol+ &o,er a (irm has. 2he .arious sources o( mono&ol+ &o,er are as (ollo,s: 1. 2he elasticit+ o( mar/et demand- because the (irms demand ,ill be at least as elastic as mar/et demand3 the elasticit+ o( mar/et demand limits the &otential (or mono&ol+ &o,er. %( there is onl+ one (irm- a &ure mono&olist3 its demand cur.e is the mar/et demand cur.e. %n this case3 the (irm4s de"ree o( mono&ol+ &o,er de&ends com&letel+ on the elasticit+ o( mar/et demand. Because the demand (or such commodities such as co((ee3 cocoa3 tin and co&&er are much more elastic3 attem&ts b+ &roducers to carteli5e these mar/ets and raise &rices ha.e lar"el+ (ailed. %n each case3 the elasticit+ o( mar/et demand limits the &otential mono&ol+ &o,er o( indi.idual &roducers. Because the demand (or oil is (airl+ inelastic in the short run!3 '6EC could raise oil &rices (ar abo.e mar"inal &roduction cost durin" 19774s and earl+ 19874s. 9. 2he number o( (irms in the mar/et- i( there are man+ (irms3 it is unli/el+ that an+ one (irm ,ill be able to a((ect &rice si"ni(icantl+. 'ther thin"s bein" e:ual3 the mono&ol+ &o,er o( each (irm ,ill (all as the number o( (irms increases: as more and more (irms com&ete3 each (irm ,ill (ind it harder to raise &rices and a.oid losin" sales to other (irms. ;. 2he interaction amon" (irms- e.en i( onl+ t,o or three (irms are in the mar/et3 each (irm ,ill be unable to &ro(itabl+ raise &rice .er+ much i( the ri.alr+ amon" them is a""ressi.e3 ,ith each (irm tr+in" to ca&ture as much as it can. Su&&ose there are < (irms in a mar/et. 2he+ mi"ht com&ete a""ressi.el+3 undercuttin" one another4s &rices to ca&ture more mar/et share. 2his could de&ri.e &rices do,n to nearl+ com&etiti.e le.els. Each (irm ,ill (ear that i( it raises its &rice it ,ill be undercut and ,ould lose its mar/et share. As a result it ,ould ha.e little mono&ol+ &o,er. <. 2he interaction amon" (irms- e.en i( onl+ t,o or three (irms are in the mar/et3 each (irm ,ill be unable to &ro(itabl+ raise &rice .er+ much i( the ri.alr+ amon" them is a""ressi.e3 ,ith each (irm tr+in" to ca&ture as much as it can. Su&&ose there are < (irms in a mar/et. 2he+ mi"ht com&ete a""ressi.el+3 undercuttin" one another4s &rices to ca&ture more mar/et share. 2his could de&ri.e &rices do,n to nearl+ com&etiti.e le.els. Each (irm ,ill (ear that i( it raises its &rice it ,ill be undercut and ,ould lose its mar/et share. As a result it ,ould ha.e little mono&ol+ &o,er.