Confidential Information of Huawei. No Spreading without Permission
2 Chapter 1 Scenario Classification 1.1 Co-Existence Co-existence is that UMTS sites and GSM sites are in the same geographical area, but not co-located.Figure 1-1 shows an example of co-existence. Cell radius =0.333 m 1000m
Figure 1-1 co-existence In this scenario, antenna location of different system is random from each other. If the antennas of different system are shooting at each other, the victim cells will reduce a lot on both capacity and coverage, or even is blocked if the interference is strong enough. Because of this, the radio network planner has to be careful on this scenario to avoid antennas point to each other. Normally, the worst case for this is not macro cell to macro cell, but macro cell to micro cell. This may introduce the dead zone for MS. Figure 1-2 gives an example of this worst case: OWJ101108 Antenna Isolation Analysis (UMTS-GSM) ISSUE1.1 Chapter 1 Scenario Classification
Confidential Information of Huawei. No Spreading without Permission
3
Figure 1-2 worst case for co-existence Actually, if GSM user is at the cell edge of GSM macro cell meanwhile much close to another UMTS micro cell, it will have great interference impact on UMTS network. For example, assuming GSM MSs RF performance is only satisfy GSM 05.05, the spurious emission to UMTS band is -30 dBm/3M (around -29dBm/3.84M ). If the Minimum Coupling Loss is 50dB, the interfering signals will around -79dBm/3.84M. For more details of the interference calculation part, please refer to chapter 2. The worst case can be avoid either we keep the sites co-located, or enlarge the MCL. Co-existence currently is not a popular design in UAE because Etisalat is the only mobile operator in UAE and has already a successful GSM operator. Co-siting for UMTS and GSM is more efficient way to building 3G network.
1.2 Co-siting Co-siting is that both UMTS and GSM sites are co-located in the same place. As mentioned above, Co-siting is more popular way to build UMTS network. Figure 1-3shows an example of co-siting: OWJ101108 Antenna Isolation Analysis (UMTS-GSM) ISSUE1.1 Chapter 1 Scenario Classification
Confidential Information of Huawei. No Spreading without Permission
4
Cell radius =0.333 m 1000m
Figure 1-3 co-siting Comparing with co-existence, co-siting has some advantages: Operator can reuse the resources of old sites and reduce the cost for building UMTS network; Operator can reuse the GSM drive test and optimization results and take as a reference to UMTS (for example: BCCH singal distribution); Co-siting can reduce near-far effects, because pathloss to both UMTS and GSM are always equal and dead zone are less likely. Since co-siting is the most popular application in UAE. The following chapters are all focus on this part. OWJ101108 Antenna Isolation Analysis (UMTS-GSM) ISSUE1.1 Chapter 2 Interference Analysis
Confidential Information of Huawei. No Spreading without Permission
5 Chapter 2 Interference Analysis For co-siting scenario, the interference situation we have to investigate is: GSM BS transmitting antenna is interfering UMTS BS receiving antenna; UMTS BS transmitting antenna is interfering GSM BS receiving antenna; In the following part, we will only investigate on these two situations. 2.1 Assumption from GSM and 3GPP specifications 2.1.1 WCDMA BS 1. Spurious emission In 3GPP specification, scenario of co-existence with GSM has already been considered and it has more rigid requirements to spurious emission on GSM 900 band and 1800 band.Table 2-1 shows the results: Table 2-1 Specification of UMTS spurious emission (from 3GPP 25.104) Bands (MHz) Maximum Level/ Measurement Bandwidth 30 ~ 1000 876 ~ 915 MHz - 98 dBm/100 KHz 921~960MHz-57dBm/100KHz Others -36dBm/100KHz 1000 ~ 2100 1710 ~ 1785 MHz - 98 dBm/100 KHz 1805~1880MHz-47dBm/100KHz 1893.5~1919.6MHz-41dBm/300KHz 1900~1920MHz-86dBm/MHz 1920~1980MHz-96dBm/100KHz 2. BS acceptable noise calculation Normally, background noise without loading is calculated with formula: BG_Noise=KTW+NF, where: K: Boltzmann constant; T: temperatures in degrees Kelvin; W: receiver bandwidth; NF: noise figure of BS; The typical value for KT=-174dBm/Hz, and assume typical NF=3dB, so the typical BG_Noise=-105dBm/3.84MHz. A typical acceptable sensitivity degradation level of radio system is less than 0.4 dB. It means that the interference is 10dB lower than the background noise as the noise floor will rise 0.4dB after adding 10 dB low interference to the background noise. Based on the above BG_Noise value, the extra interference signal should be less than -115 dBm/3.84MHz. OWJ101108 Antenna Isolation Analysis (UMTS-GSM) ISSUE1.1 Chapter 2 Interference Analysis
Confidential Information of Huawei. No Spreading without Permission
6 2.1.2 GSM BS 1. Spurious emission In GSM 05.05 specification, the limitation for GSM 900 and DCS 1800 spurious emission of UMTS band is very low, only 30dBm/3MHz: Table 2-2 Specification of GSM900 and DCS1800 spurious emission (from GSM 05.05) Band Maximum Level/ Measurement Bandwidth 9KHz 1GHz 36dBm/3MHz 1 12.75GHz 30dBm/3MHz 2. BS acceptable noise calculation Same as UMTS, background noise can also be calculated with formula: BG_Noise=KTW+NF The typical value for KT=-174dBm/Hz, and typical NF=3dB, so the typical BG_Noise=-118dBm/200kHz. A typical acceptable sensitivity degradation level of radio system is less than 0.4 dB. It means that the interference is 10dB lower than the background noise as the noise floor will rise 0.4dB after adding 10 dB low interference to the background noise.Based on the above BG_Noise value, the extra interference signal should be less than -128 dBm/200kHz. 2.2 GSM to UMTS For UMTS, NodeB acceptable noise is less than -115 dBm/3.84MHz. According to table 2, the worst case of GSM spurious emission leaked in UMTS band is -30dBm/3MHz (-29dBm/3.84MHz). Thus the isolation between GSM transmitting antenna and UMTS receiving antenna is: -29dBm (-115dBm) = 86dB. Assume both antennas are directional antenna and have same azimuth (see Figure 2-1).
Confidential Information of Huawei. No Spreading without Permission
7 In this scenario, the horizontal distance needed between two antennas is so large that it is impossible to be satisfied when co-siting. This is the worst case and additional rejection filter should be used at the GSM BS side if this case happens. Actually, the RF performance of GSM BS equipment is vendor dependent and normally is much better than that from GSM specification. For example, normally for GSM 900 BTS, in order to co-located with DCS 1800, extra attenuation will achieved in DCS 1800 band, which is close to UMTS band. 2.3 UMTS to GSM For GSM, BTS acceptable noise is less than -128dBm/200KHz. According to table 1, the maximum GSM spurious emission leaked in 900 and 1800 band is -98dBm/100KHz (-95dBm/200kHz). Thus the isolation between UMTS transmitting antenna and GSM receiving antenna is: -95dBm (-128dBm) = 33dB. Assume both antennas are directional antenna and have same azimuth (see figure 4). In this scenario, the average space distance between two antennas is less than 1m for horizontal, and less than 0.2m for vertical based on the test data in Table 4-4 and 4-5. This is a reasonable isolation to achieve under mono pole or building roof situation. Comparing the results above, the isolation got from GSM interfering UMTS is the restricted part.
OWJ101108 Antenna Isolation Analysis (UMTS-GSM) ISSUE1.1 Chapter 3 Interference Test
Confidential Information of Huawei. No Spreading without Permission
8 Chapter 3 Interference Test 3.1 Interference test methods From the theoretical calculation of chapter 2, we find that the isolation is very difficult to achieve when two systems co-located. This result is too pessimistic. Actually, the RF performance of BS equipment is vendor dependent and normally is much better than that from UMTS and GSM specification. Interference test is the best way to get the idea of how many isolation two systems is actually needed. The test method is as following: 3.1.1 GSM Spurious Emission Test Configurations
Figure 3-1 GSM Spurious Emission Test Configuration 3.1.2 Test Equipments and Accessories The test equipments and accessories are listed in Table 3-1 Table 3-1 List of test equipments and accessories test equipments and accessories Type Number Mount Spectrum Analyzer Agilent E4445A with LNA option 1 WCDMA BPF(Band Pass Filter) LGP145 1 WCDMA/GSM900 Diplexer LGP135 or Kathrein 782 10250 1 WCDMA/GSM1800 Diplexer LGP145 or Kathrein 782 10243 1 Dummy Load RF power handling >100W 1 OWJ101108 Antenna Isolation Analysis (UMTS-GSM) ISSUE1.1 Chapter 3 Interference Test
Confidential Information of Huawei. No Spreading without Permission
9 test equipments and accessories Type Number Mount Test Cable 4 Connecter Adaptor DIN(male)/N(female) 6
3.1.3 Test Process The test process is listed in Table 3-2: Table 3-2 List of test process E4445A Settings
Frequency band 1920~1980MHz RBW 100KHz VBW 300KHz Average ON Average times: 20 LNA Status: ON Steps 1) Set up the test system according to figure 3-1 2) Let GSM BTS output maximum power 3) Record the spurious power using Peak-Search function
Confidential Information of Huawei. No Spreading without Permission
10 Chapter 4 Antenna Isolation Test The exact antenna isolation of two systems needs to be less sensitivity degradation based on the analysis in chapter 2 and 3. In practice, it is difficult for engineer to achieve a real space isolation distance between UMTS and GSM antennas. The reason is that the two antennas are working in a merged near-field zone of RF electromagnetic field, which the electromagnetic field distribution and isolation level needs more complex analysis theoretically. A field test of antenna space isolation is adapted to fit the current situation in UAE project. The related test is described in this chapter. 4.1 Test method The test is carried out by two cases which are GSM900-UMTS antenna and DCS1800-UMTS antenna. Each antenna is cross polarization type. The configuration of test system is shown as figure 4-1. 4.1.1 Test condition Two cases are tested: GSM 900MHz cross-polarization antenna and UMTS cross-polarization antenna DCS 1800MHz cross-polarization antenna and UMTS cross-polarization antenna The features of antennas tested are as following: Table 4-1 Features of Antenna tested Vendor Type Number Gain HBW VBW GSM 900 Antenna JB 7600 17dBi 60 9 DCS 1800 Antenna JB 5022004 18dBi 60 5.5 UMTS Antenna MAT 5162100 18.5dBi 65 6
Two 9m 1/2 cables are used in this test and each cables loss is regarded as 1dB in GSM 900 band and 2dB in GSM1800 and UMTS bands. The isolation data in this test is processed so that the cable loss is excluded. The antenna ports are selected so that transmit antenna and receive antenna have the same polarization. The antennas are installed 8m above ground and are directed toward the same direction. OWJ101108 Antenna Isolation Analysis (UMTS-GSM) ISSUE1.1 Chapter 4 Antenna Isolation Test
Confidential Information of Huawei. No Spreading without Permission
11 4.1.2 Antenna Isolation Test Configurations
Figure 4-1 Configuration Diagram of Antenna Isolation Test 4.1.3 Test Equipments and Accessories The test equipments and accessories are listed in Table 4-2: Table 4-2 List of test equipments and accessories Test equipments and accessories Type Number Amount Spectrum Analyzer HP8594E 1 Test Cable 9m 2 Antenna GSM,WCDMA antenna 2 Connecter Adaptor DIN(male)/N(female) 4 Matching Load N(male) 2 4.1.4 Test Process The brief description of three test steps and instrument settings are given in Table 4-3. Table 4-3 List of test equipments and accessories HP8594E settings: Frequency band 890~2170MHz RBW 100KHz VBW 300KHz Average ON Average times: 20 output power:10dBm signal type:CW
Steps 1) Set up the test system according to figure 4-1 OWJ101108 Antenna Isolation Analysis (UMTS-GSM) ISSUE1.1 Chapter 4 Antenna Isolation Test
Confidential Information of Huawei. No Spreading without Permission
12 2) Turn on RF power 3) Record the isolation values at different frequencies. 4.2 Test results 4.2.1 Case 1 Antenna Isolation of GSM900 and UMTS The antenna isolation data of GSM900 and UMTS antenna in two frequency bands is recorded in Table 4-4. The cable loss is not included in these data. Table 4-4 Antenna isolation data between GSM900 and UMTS
890MH z 902.5M Hz 915MH z 935MH z 947.5M Hz 960MH z 1920M Hz 1950M Hz 1980M Hz 2110M Hz 2140M Hz 2170M Hz 0.5 m 65dB 68dB 68dB 71dB 65dB 70dB 55dB 58dB 62dB 49dB 52dB 62dB 1.0 m 70dB 72dB 73dB 71dB 71dB 71dB 57dB 61dB 67dB 62dB 66dB 63dB 1.5 m 72dB 71dB 70dB 69dB 72dB 72dB 65dB 66dB 68dB 57dB 58dB 60dB 2.0 m 71dB 73dB 73dB 69dB 71dB 73dB 71dB 67dB 70dB 58dB 63dB 63dB 4.2.2 Case 2 Antenna Isolation of GSM1800 and UMTS The antenna isolation data of GSM1800 and UMTS antenna in two frequency bands is recorded in Table 4-5. The RF loss of cables is not included in these data. Table 4-5 Antenna isolation data between GSM1800 and UMTS
Confidential Information of Huawei. No Spreading without Permission
13 Wide-band Antenna Selection For the antenna selection, introduce the new antenna is preferable, especially for optimization freedom. But sometimes the room is limited and we have to use wide band antenna for both GSM and UMTS. When selecting wide band antennas for new UMTS system, it is better firstly following chapter 2 and 3 to test the interference between each other and find the safe isolation value. Then with this isolation value, you can choose the proper wide-band antenna from antenna list.