Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
C)
in both air and nitrogen environments. From X-ray diffraction (XRD) and weight-loss measurements, the extent of
limestone calcination was found to increase with increasing furnace temperature for both shell species and furnace
atmospheres. Analysis showed that the lime was present as a layer on the surface of the shell particles. From scanning
electron microscope (SEM) images, signicant changes in the surface morphology of the raw shells were observed
as a result of heat treatment in both air and nitrogen atmospheres. Preliminary testing of shells heat-treated in both
air and nitrogen atmospheres indicated that both types of shell removed about 90% of phosphates in water within
30 min, whereas up to 40% of phosphates were removed with untreated shells. Our results for heat-treated oyster shell
differ slightly with studies in the literature, which report an absence of compositional and structural changes in an air
atmosphere. 2007 Curtin University of Technology and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
KEYWORDS: shells; pyrolysis; heat treatment; phosphate; lime
INTRODUCTION
Shellsh farming in New Zealand is a well-established
industry; the two commercial species of interest are the
green lipped mussel (Perna canaliculus) and pacic
oyster (Crassostrea gigas). Figures from the Ministry
of New Zealand Fisheries indicate that the annual crop
of mussels alone is around 67 000 tonnes. Processed
shellsh are often sold without their shells, creating
large volumes of shell waste.
Shell disposal can be problematic due to current
environmental regulations in New Zealand, which limit
the disposal of shells back to the sea. The use of
landlls is limited by the fee that is charged on a per
volume basis and the requirement of some sites that
shells are free of organic matter. Traditional alternatives
to landll include producing low-value products from
shells such as aggregates for driveways and pathways.
An alternative solution is to use heat processing to
convert the shells to lime (calcium oxide) for use in
*Correspondence to: M. I. Jones, Department of Chemical and
Materials Engineering, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019,
Auckland, New Zealand. E-mail: mark.jones@auckland.ac.nz
water treatment as a phosphate removal agent (Kwon
et al ., 2004; Lee et al ., 2005). Waterways with high
phosphate levels are a problem in New Zealand: around
90% of lakes in the North Island are considered
eutrophic (Taylor and Smith, 1997).
In this study we investigate lime formation from
mussel and oyster shells and use the treated shells to
perform preliminary phosphate-removal tests on water.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials
Shells from green-lipped mussels (P. canaliculus) and
the pacic oyster (C. gigas) were obtained from
Coromandel-based shellsh processors owned by San-
fords, a New Zealand seafood company. These were
stored in a freezer. Prior to use, the frozen shells were
thawed and scrubbed clean. The shells were then dried
in an oven, crushed in a ring mill and sieved. Crushed
shell particles with size range of 300600 m were
used for experiments.
2007 Curtin University of Technology and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Asia-Pacic Journal of Chemical Engineering PROCESSING SEAFOOD SHELLS FOR EUTROPHICATION CONTROL 461
Heat treatment and pyrolysis
A horizontal tube furnace was used for the treatment of
crushed shells at 650, 750 and 800
with a 0.02
-step size
and a 1-s step time. All gures with XRD spectra have
intensity (arbitrary units) plotted against 2.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
Scanning electron microscope (SEM) studies were per-
formed using an FEI Quanta 200 FEG environmen-
tal scanning electron microscope (5 kV accelerating
voltage). Samples were sputter-coated with a plasma-
applied platinum coating to prevent charging.
Phosphate removal experiments
Preliminary tests were conducted to assess the phos-
phate removal rate from water with added shells. For
each test, 2 l of phosphate solution (30 mg/l) was dosed
with 10 g of crushed shells. Experiments were car-
ried out in a stirred vessel to ensure adequate mixing.
Water samples were taken every 20 min and measured
for phosphate content using a Perkin Elmer Lamda 35
UV/Vis Spectrometer at 880 nm (APHA Ascorbic Acid
method).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The XRD spectra of crushed raw shells (Fig. 1) show
that the crystalline component of the untreated mussel
shell is aragonite, whereas the crystalline component
of the untreated oyster shell is calcite. Both aragonite
and calcite are different mineral forms of calcium
carbonate. The heat treatment of mussel shells at 650,
Aragonite
0
50
100
150
200
250
20 30 40 50
(a)
(b)
60
2-theta (degrees)
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
Calcite
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
20 30 40 50 60 70
2-theta (degrees)
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
Figure 1. XRDspectra for crushed rawshells: (a) mussel and
(b) oyster. XRD spectral peaks corresponding to aragonite
and calcite are labelled with symbols, as indicated.
750 and 800
C, (b) 750
C (Fig. 8),
both mussel and oyster shell particles show signs of
having undergone sintering, being rounder and having
less dened edges than the raw shell surface particles.
20 30
(a)
(b)
40 50 60 70
2-theta (degrees)
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
Calcite
2-theta (degrees)
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
Calcite
20 30 40 50 60
Lime
Figure 3. XRD spectra of mussel shell samples pyrolysed at:
(a) 650
C, (b) 750
C. XRD
spectral peaks for calcite and lime are labelled with
symbols, as indicated.
Figure 5. Lime content (expressed as a percentage of total
shell weight) vs furnace temperature for mussel and oyster
shell (heat-treated and pyrolysed). This gure is available in
colour online at www.apjChemEng.com.
Given that XRD analysis has shown lime present in
the pyrolysed and heat-treated shells used in the phos-
phate removal experiments, the mechanism for phos-
phate removal from water can be demonstrated with the
following equilibria (Tchobanoglous and Burton, 1991),
where the hydroxyapatite, Ca
10
(PO
4
)
6
(OH)
2
, precipi-
tates out the soluble phosphates:
Ca(OH)
2
+H
2
CO
3
CaCO
3
+2H
2
O (2)
Ca(OH)
2
+Ca(HCO
3
)
2
2CaCO
3
+2H
2
O (3)
10Ca
2+
+6PO
4
3
+2OH
Ca
10
(PO
4
)
6
(OH)
2
(4)
At the end of the phosphate removal experiments,
the formation of a gelatinous-looking sludge was
observed suspended in the phosphate solution and
a build-up of scum formed on the surface of the
solution. Figure 11 is an SEM micrograph of a dried
sludge sample from phosphate removal experiments
Figure 6. Heat-treated shells. Mussel shells (top) and oyster shells (bottom).
Treatment temperatures from left to right: 650, 750 and 800
C.
2007 Curtin University of Technology and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Asia-Pac. J. Chem. Eng. 2007; 2: 460467
DOI: 10.1002/apj
464 J. A. CURRIE ET AL. Asia-Pacic Journal of Chemical Engineering
(a)
(b)
Figure 7. SEM micrographs of raw shell particle
surface: (a) mussel shell and (b) oyster shell.
using heat-treated oyster shell originally heated to a
temperature of 800
C, (b) 750
C and
(c) 800
C) removed phosphates to
a comparable, though slightly lower, level to the cal-
cium carbonate powder. In that study, the initial pH
of the solution had no effect on phosphate removal
by adsorption; this differs from what we would expect
when lime is used Eqns (2)(4). Namasivayam et al .
(Namasivayam et al ., 2005) reported that raw oyster
shells did not remove any phosphates, however, from
2007 Curtin University of Technology and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Asia-Pac. J. Chem. Eng. 2007; 2: 460467
DOI: 10.1002/apj
466 J. A. CURRIE ET AL. Asia-Pacic Journal of Chemical Engineering
our current work and the work done by others (Kwon
et al ., 2004; Lee et al ., 2005), we see that phosphate
removal can occur. Namasivayam et al . (Namasivayam
et al ., 2005) do not specify whether the raw shells
were crushed and this may explain the different results,
particularly as surface area is an important parameter
for adsorption.
In the work on crushed oyster shell waste by Kwon
et al . (Kwon et al ., 2004), the best phosphate removal
(98%) was achieved using oyster shell pyrolysed at
750
C).
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
20 30 40 50 60 70
2-theta (degrees)
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
yCalcite
Hydroxyapatite
Figure 12. XRD spectrum for dried suspended sludge
obtained at the end of phosphate removal experiments
using oyster shell (originally heat-treated at 800
C).
Figure 13. SEM micrograph of dried surface
scum obtained at the end of phosphate removal
experiments using oyster shell (originally heat-
treated at 800
C).
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
20 30 40 50 60 70
2-theta (degrees)
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
yCalcite
Figure 14. XRD spectrum for surface scum collected
during phosphate removal efciency of shells. All peaks are
associated with calcite, a mineral formof calciumcarbonate.
2007 Curtin University of Technology and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Asia-Pac. J. Chem. Eng. 2007; 2: 460467
DOI: 10.1002/apj
Asia-Pacic Journal of Chemical Engineering PROCESSING SEAFOOD SHELLS FOR EUTROPHICATION CONTROL 467
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
20 30 40 50 60 70
2-theta (degrees)
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
Calcite
Calcium Phosphate
Figure 15. XRD spectrum for used oyster shell (originally
heat-treated at 800
C
did not detect the presence of lime only calcium
carbonate, which was also present in the raw oyster
shell. In addition, the corresponding SEM micrograph
showed no discernable difference between raw oyster
shell and the sample that was heat-treated at 750
C,
unlike our results (Figs 7 and 9). It is possible that
differences in the heating regime or the particle size of
the crushed shells could explain the differing results, as
these are not specied by Kwon et al . (Kwon et al .,
2004); further work investigating the effect of these
parameters on lime formation is required to better
understand this process.
CONCLUSIONS
We have demonstrated that it is possible to convert both
mussel and oyster shells into lime (calcium oxide) by
crushing the shells and applying heat in either a nitrogen
or air atmosphere. Temperatures of 750 and 800
C
were most successful in producing lime. Preliminary
tests indicate that shell-derived lime can remove around
90% of phosphate from solution and that raw shells
(comprised of calcium carbonate) can achieve up to
around 40% removal.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the following tech-
nicians in the Department of Chemical and Materi-
als Engineering, University of Auckland for their help
with this work: Alec Asadov, Catherine Hobbis, Allan
Clendinning and Laura Liang.
REFERENCES
Kwon HB, Lee CW, Jun BS, Yun JD, Weon SY, Koopman B.
Recycling waste oyster shells for eutrophication control. Resour.
Conserv. Recycl. 2004; 41: 7582.
Lee CW, Kwon HC, Jeon HP, Koopman B. Phosphate recovery
from water as hydroxyapatite with activated oystershell. Mater.
Sci. Forum 2005; 486487: 177180.
Taylor R, Smith I. The State of New Zealands Environment. GP
Publications: Wellington, 1997.
Tchobanoglous G, Burton FL. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment,
Disposal and Reuse. McGraw Hill Book Company: Singapore,
1991.
Namasivayam C, Sakoda A, Suzuki M. Removal of phosphate by
adsorption onto oyster shell powder. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.
2005; 80: 356358.
2007 Curtin University of Technology and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Asia-Pac. J. Chem. Eng. 2007; 2: 460467
DOI: 10.1002/apj