WORD OF GOD

... through Bertha Dudde

2110
Violation of free will
by fellow human beings....
he human being!s resol"e determines his a#tions and thoughts. $e
#an #ertainly be o%%osed by another %erson!s will and he #an be
%re"ented from im%lementing his own will& but then two e'ual
for#es will be fighting ea#h other and the stronger resol"e will be
"i#torious( but this does not deny freedom of will.
)o therefore the human being himself inhibits his fellow human
being& and this is in a##ordan#e with God!s will as soon as the
human will %re"ents his fellow human being from im%lementing
heartless a#tions. *n that #ase a strong will is a blessing for a fellow
human being.
Vi#e "ersa& howe"er& it is "ery wrong to misuse a strong will by
%re"enting a fellow human being from #arrying out +ind,hearted
a#ti"ities and s%iritual stri"ing and #urtailing his own resol"e. )u#h
a battle against ea#h other is based on heartlessness and #an ne"er
be in a##ordan#e with God!s will.
he moti"e im%elling a %erson!s will into a#tion is therefore always
the de#isi"e fa#tor. he will remains free e"en if it is %re"ented from
being im%lemented& this is why the will is -udged and not always
the deed.... if a %erson!s will had no intention to a##om%lish a deed
but was for#ed by his fellow human being into doing so.
.o human being on /arth should ele"ate himself for the sa+e of
dominating his fellow human being& for this #ontradi#ts the right
relationshi% between %eo%le in the eyes of God.
/"en those with great earthly %ower at their dis%osal should treat
their subordinates li+e brothers( they should use their will by using
their ruling %ower with lo"e& by only e"er stri"ing towards that
whi#h is good and thus also trying to %ersuade their fellow human
beings to ma+e #orre#t use of their will& that is& to only do deeds
whi#h are %leasing to God.
But as soon as a ruling %ower for#es %eo%le into #arrying out deeds
whi#h #ontradi#t the #ommandment of lo"e& it also binds their will&
i.e. it ma+es it im%ossible for them to use their free will and thus it
must also bear the res%onsibility for all for#ibly underta+en deeds.
$en#e& free will& in an earthly res%e#t& is not #urtailed by God&
instead& only %eo%le disable ea#h other!s freedom of will.
0et a "iolation of will is only %ossible in an earthly way. *n a
s%iritual res%e#t no %ower on earth is able to influen#e freedom of
will.
.o %ower on earth #an for#e the human will into a s%e#ifi# attitude
towards God& no %ower on earth #an %re"ent its in#lination towards
God but neither #an any %ower in#line it towards $im if it is still in
o%%osition to $im.
he human being must use his own will to form his o%inion of God
and what he de#ides to do is entirely u% to him.
he will!s a%%arent la#+ of freedom in an earthly res%e#t #an
o##asionally ha"e a fa"ourable effe#t on his o%inion about God& for
where he #onsiders his freedom to be inhibited a %erson often loo+s
for a s%iritual balan#e.... $e a#ti"ates his free will where it #annot
be %re"ented&
and thus an e1ternal #oer#ion #an still be of benefit to him& sin#e
the a#tual %ur%ose of life merely #onsists of the de#ision of will for
or against God whi#h& howe"er& will ne"er e1#lude the fa#t that it is
wrong to use the strength of will between %eo%le to inhibit another
%erson!s will.
Were the #ommandments of lo"e obser"ed& e"ery %erson would
want that whi#h would benefit his fellow human being and all
intentions of dominating another %erson would be eliminated.
2n+indness& howe"er& im%els %eo%le into ta+ing e"er more se"ere
measures against ea#h other.... he strong %erson will always use
his will and o"erride the will of the wea+ whi#h& in a manner of
s%ea+ing& is the influen#e of the %ower that on#e misused its free
will for the a%ostasy from God....
3men
4ublished by friends of new re"elations of God 5 *nformation&
download of all translated re"elations& theme,boo+lets at6
htt%677www.bertha,dudde.info7english7inde1.html

htt%677en.bertha,dudde.org7