Susan V The Republican, Democratic and Libertarian Parties now sitting within

Sioux City’s federal courthouse. Upon John Roberts failing to respond thus the process
is now exhausted I then filed the case as a judgment of default as that is what it is. An
authority case must be heard in person before SCOTUS or SCOTUS is no longer the
court of authority, get it? Obama and Roberts HAD to respond as it’s not a choice if it’s
an authority case. If SCOTUS writes denied then it is denying the Constitution and
denying the Justices have to obey the law. US V Nixon says different as did Marbury
and so do I. It’s also attached to the SCOTUS case 09-6777 as an intervening
circumstance, a federal case already filed, as it is now pointless to petition to be reheard
but I’m doing it regardless thus I am already making an attempt to collect the default
judgment that I won in the Sioux City court and not waiting upon any SCOTUS
rehearing. I’m going through the motion of being reheard only so they can’t say I did not.
I do not believe people who are women, black, Jewish or Sioux will be happy when they
read it (for Scrbd I placed the letter sent to the Sioux and the JDL before the actual
complaint re the default judgment; complaint begins on page 22):

The letter to the JDL which includes the letter to the Sioux: I know this as
absolute fact without question as I witnessed it realized in the living flesh once
already in the US at a political rally and it hasn't died yet as the federal court isn't
letting me tell anyone. Apparently the Holocaust has been forgotten. Even by Jews. I
know genocide began in the US quite a while ago as genocide is when any nation
demands you die without constitutional reason and no just cause - when the state
begins putting you to death in defense of the invention of the institution as all male, in
defense of the dead paper itself such as a bad declaration of war or when the courts
condone it and even make it ‘legal’ thus allowing the guilty to put the innocent to
death as an award of the court such as Schiavo, Carhart and Gonzales. What I
witnessed was how that - the state doing it to the citizens - then comes to be
accepted by the people as normal, legal and real. I witnessed the exact moment a
nation of people realizes the big lie Hitler was telling. I saw that idea born into or
inserted into our physical and emotional reality thus it is only a matter of time.

I am a witness to the very thing Hitler was and what the Nazis then did being realized
in the US. I knew what I was experiencing when it happened and I knew it was

1
related to Bush V Gore due to something unique about US law as until a lone citizen
rose and wielded their vote as an Executive Order our law was 'incomplete' thus it
allowed for a fascist or dictator to rise. Well, as SCOTUS may not make law then all
they did with BVG, a case that was completely falsified and made up - there was no
actual legal case or actual federal question - all SCOTUS then did was install a
military dictator. It's why you then had things like the Patriot Act, an illegal war based
upon bad evidence and the infamous John Woo memos suggesting the military could
be used as a police power to then arrest citizens and place them in concentration like
camps, military run prison camps.

When I realized I was then witnessing exactly how Hitler and the Nazis managed to
do what they did and why so-called 'good' people went along at a political rally I
memorized it knowing I would be within federal court someday. I also knew that the
person who fund the political parties were out to foreignize the office as once this
thing is realized in any nation? It never, ever goes away or ends until the chain of
causation is broken and so the criminals buying and selling the presidential election
would want to enforce the conditions that make this real not end them as they can
only operate and get away with what they do if the people believe it is 'justified' - such
as elect a foreigner as he is black, as if black makes it just wholly ignoring the fact
that foreigner makes it criminal. For instance, even if Obama was born here he was
automatically disqualified when he signed Resolution 511 as he was resolving to
violate the rights of all natural born Americans and all women and doing so in a way
that rises to become a crime as he is a lawyer so he knows what he did is a violation
of US law. He's not doing anything he is doing by mistake or accident. His true beliefs
then, which he acts upon, are foreign to US law as he believes he is above it, as if he
is an exception - as if when he does it it is not a crime. You then have a big problem
on your hands if the conditions that allowed Hitler to rise are now real here in the US
and your Chief Law Enforcement Officer is a person who was and is in open and
direct violation of US law as that then allows corrupted and criminal lawyers and
businessmen to run amok and do whatever they want as it is they who then control
and abuse the Office of the Executive not Obama. It is exactly like Hitler as he was
not running the show but was a front man. And Jews need to be afraid as the
Republicans are now promoting Arnold Swarzeneggar for President, a German

2
Austrian. A person who justifies killing women and their children and anybody else
who is in his way by lying and saying "This is a Christian nation" and citing God as a
reason. THAT'S THE - HIS - PARTY LINE.

So I went to SCOTUS with an authority case. The clerks told me they were going to
sink it and did - I have zero evidence it was ever seen by the Justices as clerks have
been allowed to abuse the process and so do have the ability to ruin cases - thus all I
could do is attack the court over and over until I had incontrovertible proof: Their own
docket as it matches nothing in our law except the federal criminal code. A
constitutional authority case? The only place you can and may hear it is in SCOTUS
as SCOTUS itself is the court of constitutional authority; in this type of case you
cannot and may not refuse to respond or fail to hear it in person.

December 2000 -The People default on the Declaration and Constitution by failing to
vote

April 2008 - SCOTUS violates Marbury w/o any hearing at all

November 2008 - The US, the sitting officers, default by failing to respond at all

December 2008 - SCOTUS acts upon my emergency application but refuses to file
the document as then Americans will know; this violates everyone’s rights especially
your right of safety and informed consent; you know as fact I made my case as
SCOTUS can't act upon bad cases or cases that do not prove anything; the JDF
needs to know this: I made my case against the US' sitting officers by citing
Mermelstein V IHR.

November 2009 - SCOTUS officially defaults as I sued John Roberts exactly and the
Court and not one Justice responded. It does not matter if the clerks sank the case
as SCOTUS defaulted when it lost control of the Court as no clerk should ever be
able to do the things clerks are doing. Because this is an authority case and
SCOTUS clerks did it? It rises to treason.

3
As I can now claim that the latest SCOTUS denial is a default judgment I enter it as
such to the Sioux City Federal District Court. It is now a case whereby the
withholding of the actual paper commission is itself the violation of a fully vested
interest and right and as such Marbury V Madison says the commission must be
adjudicated and delivery of the paper must occur.

I attached some of the court documents. Below is a letter I sent to the Sioux as I was
able to legally win their land back by claiming it falls under or is an actual allodial
title. Although it is pointless I did mail in a petition to be reheard in SCOTUS. That's
attached too.

I cannot stress how very dangerous the current situation is as it can and may erupt
and turn into mass violence at any time; you really truly can be rounded up as things
are. People, mainly women and children, are being targeted. It's a conspiracy of the
unethical versus the ethical. You must shut women out via foreignization to
accomplish this as women not men have the vested interest and right in enforcing the
law as their interest is their children. Think of Rome and Greece - they became
corrupt but the final nail in their coffin was rendering women powerless so they then
could and did begin sexually molesting children and installing men worshipped
as gods thus any and all depravity was made legal and the injury became to severe
to ever overcome and so they fell as nations. Sound familiar? It should as it is
happening here: Atheists rule the day when they bring zero evidence and zero proof
into court and when what they do enter is proof against them not for them and when
our law names a Creator exactly, the recent naming of possible 'death panels' for the
elderly and infirm, Congress installing and engendering socialism and using the
House Judiciary Committee as a kangaroo court of constitutional authority so that it's
actions seem to be legal when they aren't, pets treated as if they are actual children
and so receive more protection of the law than actual human children and their
mothers - in NY the animal cruelty codes are stricter than the codes for people and
women are equated to animals and then made to be less than animals according to
official policy of NY as even physical injury to women is excused, denied and ignored
by the police and by judges in the family courts - while Obama has been portrayed
as a crucified Christ figure and compared to King Jr. a sacrificed 'god-like' hero when

4
there is zero comparison to be made and sexual violence is now endemic; the sexual
molestation of children and the rape of women is now normalized. And the leaders of
this nation now chant "This is a Christian nation" over and over and when acting as
officers and when it defies reality, as it violates the 1st amendment, as not all of the
Founders were Christians, as the only 'free' or unrestricted Jewish synagogue in the
west was located in colonial America at one time and as our Founders stated that we
were not such a nation and even placed the fact that they did not use Christianity as
a model in writing during the war with pirates at Tripoli. And I my own self witnessed
it: Jews at a political rally cheering for their own extinction. We're making the
exact same mistakes over again only as they are dressed up differently and words
are being skewed in an insidious way to disguise the lies being told nobody but
nobody is seeing, hearing or feeling it. As the people lost the human ability to feel
liberty and unconditional love as an emotion they can't recognize hate when they feel
it. They don't feel it; instead they feel unconditional pride.

The most dangerous thing of all is the biggest lie Hitler told is now alive and well in
America as that lie has to do with emotions and confusing pride with love thus
'hardwiring' pride to id instead of ego and using politics and religion to justify it thus it
seems as if it is righteous when it is the exact opposite. It is a nation of people willing
to violate each and every law and then the spirit of the law only to get whatever they
want and no matter who it harms. It's a nation whereby victim has become a state of
being and so the victims then act as the victimizers sinking into the morass instead of
rising above it but telling themselves what they do is not 'wrong' as they had no other
choice and as everybody else is doing it. An absolute lie under US law as you always
have another choice as all of this is voluntary; if the citizens weren't willing to
participate it could not happen as it wouldn't be possible.

From the Sioux City complaint, entered as an attempt to collect a judgment of default
on behalf of Jews:

7. Both major parties are guilty. I‘ll deal with the Republicans first: In the fall of
2004 I went to a political rally sponsored by the Republicans at which George Bush
Jr. was to appear. Ultimately I received the shock of my life, as I am a witness to

5
genocide born in the US. For years sociologists have been looking for this answer as
have I. Scientists could name the elements and which conditions did not seem to
matter; they could not name the cycle or the pattern or if they had every element or
how they came together. I can answer this question due to the Republican Party.

8. Several elements do need to exist plus they do come together in a very

specific way and scientists are wrong: I now know what comes before the eruption
of mass violence so that I can state as fact what happened in Rwanda may have
been longer in coming then anyone ever imagined. The best way I know how to say
it to a federal judge: An event such BVG or 9/11 occurs; there seems to be an
escalation of fear plus injustice. BVG is very, very important – what it is and does to
cause genocide is intrinsic – but 9/11 is not very consequential because all it needs
to be is anything the leaders can use as an excuse to act unjustly or create more
irrational fear, what I named suspicious fear: be suspicious; be worried; your
neighbor may be your enemy; you can’t see your enemy. It’s a rev up. Then all
necessary elements are realized in one time and one place and so genocide ripens.
I saw the event that no one ever saw before; when and how it ripens so that mass
violence may erupt. At this point it’s possible as the ‘machine’ is in place and the
people did it once so it is then alive and what I witnessed and what I know tell me
that IS how Nazi Germany was born and nobody realized it but not what Rwanda
saw as Rwanda had no central cult personality surrounded by ‘officers’ who actually
did all the dirty work. However I can answer the questions about Rwanda, as now I
know what no other person ever knew.

9. This sounds awful; it is. Bush Jr. is not guilty; he had no idea what happened
before he arrived and I saw him flinch when a person held up a sign reading Jews
for Bush. Why? The hate speech, that’s why. I saw Jews cheering for their own
extinction, women cheering for their own extinction and enlisted service members
cheering for their own extinction. The news is not all bad: As I was there the US can
now own up to it and then take credit for giving the world an answer that can stop
genocide forever. The whole event is on tape and I have a witness: A Vietnam
Veteran as it seemed that only he and I and perhaps a few other Veterans knew

6
something had gone horribly wrong. I, Susan, knew the exact word - genocide -
and so I became terrified and fled for my life.

10. We know BVG and everything that happened up to fall 2004 – a time before
we knew it is a bad declaration of war. The Republicans said you had to arrive 5
hours before the event or you couldn’t get in. 5 hours in the baking sun in FL in a
football stadium; it was an oven. To get in you had to pass through ‘security guards’
– members of the Republican Party or at least the guy who touched me was. They
began roughing people up. They began confiscating silly things only to throw them
out as if you had to leave it they were dumping it not leaving it for you to claim. So a
mood developed.

11. Now we’re in the stadium. As it heats up the concession stands are
charging outrageous prices for drinks and food. You have five hours of this. Then
the toilets overflow all over the stadium. It is getting worse and worse and worse. I
can feel the mood shifting and I begin to realize what I might be witnessing but I
keep telling myself it’s impossible. I’m thinking this can’t be but I know genocide so
the only word I have is ripen, maybe this is how it ripens so then the possibility of
mass violence exists at any time; maybe it’s not possible until it ripens. I now know
that’s it, it must ripen. Something is made physically real. Exacting thoughts,
feelings, ideas and beliefs along with motivation and intent combined with issues
regarding power, victimization, justification not justice and morals not ethics is
made real. The otherwise ‘good’ civilians doing it? They are the targeted victims
and do not even know it; they are unaware they have been actively ‘recruited’ to
participate and so do not know they have been deliberately targeted. This is
important, as coming into play in order to keep the recruited participants unaware is
a cycle of blame, shame, anger and guilt.

12. A Vietnam Veteran sits down. Everybody is talking and he begins talking
about John Kerry; he’s not here to ask you to vote for Bush as he’s here to tell us:
WHATEVER YOU DO YOU CAN NOT VOTE FOR KERRY; EVEN DON’T VOTE
AS LONG AS YOU DO NOT CAST YOUR VOTE FOR KERRY. He has no idea
who he’s voting for due to the candidates – none of them are fit; none of them are

7
safe. You’re either safe or not; safety is or not. There’s no such thing as a little
safety or a little liberty. So people start asking him questions.

13. I listen to him talking and I stop him: I have a question: “I know about the
Swift boats; I hear Swift boat everything. Now you just said something – unfit for
command. I don’t need to know about Swift Boats. Why did you, a person not here
to vote for Bush and a veteran just say unfit for command like you did? What’s
YOUR reasoning?” So he said, “He lied about the return of his medals.” I reply,
“Okay now I know: Violation of a renegotiated honor bound contract. He’s unfit to
command.” This happens to be one of the most grievous offenses you can commit.
You give up your medals as it is your claims THE PEOPLE have violated the
Declaration and Constitution wholly and absolutely in your case. You are no longer
a party to the contract. If things change and the contract is renegotiated the
President representing THE PEOPLE re-awards your medals. At that point? You
had better not look sideways if looking sideways is a violation. A lie? A violation.
Cheating? A violation. Running for any office when not fit to serve? A violation. This
nation needs to get right with itself: all the proof I ever wanted or needed was that
Veteran saying he came here on his day off not to vote for Bush but to stop me
from voting for Kerry. If he said or did nothing else that is the proof. I believe
Vietnam Veterans: I do not believe one of them: John Kerry. How many veterans
have to tell me if you elect that man you might be killed? 1. Not 2, not 20, not 75 but
1.

14. So all day long things worsen, it’s more heaped on top of what feels as if it
is unbearable, it’s like a sewer, until the hate speech begins. Like nothing I have
ever heard in my life. The speakers begin and it is insanity from the get go; it has
been building up all day as there were acts like musicians every once in a while so
a person would grab a mike and blurt something out or they would broadcast
something to ‘entertain’ us while we waited. It is a mixture of politicians and party
leaders plus well known locals. An ex-Model named Kim Alexis gives a speech.
[Kim Alexis is a person, a good person, who then participated. Why? I know why.
This is my reasoning for naming her - not as she’s guilty but as she has some of the
most priceless living testimony ever as she was there and she did it but she did not

8
know.] From among the speakers she stood out as she’s a woman and a mother
and her words made my blood run cold. Certain words and slogans are repeated ad
infinitum. Bloody, bloody, baby, women, Christian, bloody, murder, and on and on.
Men get up. Jesus, bloody, baby, women, murder, drugs. THIS IS A CHRISTIAN
NATION. Over and over and over. You think it’ll stop or somebody will react but
they do not. Now it’s bloody, baby, women, WAR, JESUS, WAR, bloody, Christian,
abortion, bloody. I’m getting more and more concerned. I’m watching it all, taking it
all in as now I know: I am about to see how genocide is born; I’m gonna know –
how did the Nazis do it, why good people did it and why the Jews didn’t act. I want
the court to note: I always knew I’d have to give this answer to the Jews then the
rest if the world. Once I knew I was actually seeing it? I captured it all in my minds
eye paying special attention to: the emotions. Those I captured in my body; you can
sort of internalize them to recall them later. It’s a gift, as I have an instrument that is
perfectly calibrated – my ears – as I listen different, with my entire person; I record
or memorize things differently than other people do. It’s related to how I process
language so that I experience the actual whole truth while others experience only a
part of it or miss it completely. I was experiencing the truth of the whole event in
that stadium; others missed it entirely while that Veteran knew most of it. That’s
because: If your person matches US law in letter and sprit, if you have those same
beliefs and practice them, your emotional compass is very finely tuned. Mine
happens to be perfectly calibrated the way a perfumer has a perfectly calibrated
nose or a taste tester has a perfectly calibrated tongue. It’s what makes me such a
deadly constitutional attorney: If an argument or ruling – or a belief - does not
match the Constitution? I’ll know it and I’ll know exactly what it is and why. It will
light up like a Christmas tree for me. Then I can read what the Justices wrote and
know: This is what the lawyer needs or this is what they all missed or this is where
the Justices erred. Sometimes I will read one or two sentences and know; other
times the caption alone will tell me. Often I can even identify what mistaken belief
specific people involved in the case have as it’s all over the paper but they do not
realize it, as they aren’t doing what I’m doing. As people produce paper? I can
listen to a piece of paper the same way I can listen to a person.

9
 15. The stadium feels like it is filling up with water, as if we’ll drown, and the
crowd is cheering insanely and then suddenly on the jumbotron is a JEWS FOR
BUSH sign. The crowd cheers; Bush flinches – he knows something is wrong as it
is the way they cheered – only he says something like “We’re a Christian nation
but there’s room for Jews too.” And there it was; it ripened: This crowd let up a roar
EXACTLY like the People hearing Hitler let out. It’s distinctive; I will never forget the
sound and feeling of it. The extreme physical discomfort; the extreme heat and
smell of the overflowing bathrooms; the anger; the nonstop hate speech; the
imagery, very detailed ideas of graphic violence regarding women and babies but
labeled Christianity, mixed with the emotions that were swirling around as if waves
washing over the participants and the sound of that roar rising like an expectant
release of joy, eagerness, but joy for violence and death; a religious fervor for a
political agenda whether it is constitutional or not and no matter who it harms, so
urgent even your own person is expendable for the good of the cause. The sound
that the crowd made in that one incredible roar was deeper and more intense than
any cheering I have ever heard but the intensity of the emotion is what frightened
me the most, as if these people were made to be temporarily insane, actually
insane, as they were feeling joy but expressing the idea of blood and death for no
named reason, so that expressing this insane idea purposely – This is a Christian
nation - to then feel that emotion became their cause and became their reason. If
they expressed that idea – those words in that order no matter how senseless they
are in the context of America - they were rewarded with that emotion – joy - so
death and the idea of killing women and babies made them feel good as it cannot
be murder if Christians do it. The emotion itself became their god; the emotion itself
became their cause and they would say or do anything to get it. I do not like to use
the word joy, perhaps joy infused with pride, you’re proud to be killing women in the
name of Jesus, as to feel this you need to have other people around you who
engage in a sort of give and take. It’s as if you need that outside approval to then
feel the emotion, that to get that approval is to then be able to feel it. I witnessed
what happens when individuals have had their sense of self annihilated to such an
extent and degree that they then ‘adopt’ a collective created sense of self, a sense
of self that is located completely outside each person so that if the group promotes
it you then identify with it – you are it or so you truly believe – thus you feel good

10
 when you express it, even it is insensible like equating Christianity with death
instead of life. You have traded your will for the will of the crowd; you have replaced
I with us, not we. The people in that crowd could not tell you what they were
cheering for if you asked them; all they could do is say exact words but not
delineate any actual concept or any actual belief. Human emotion without any
reason; unconditional pride. The Nazis had unconditional pride; it was their sense
of self; it was directly wired to their id but that id only exists as a group. It doesn’t
exist if the group doesn’t exist. Each individual had wholly conditional love, hate,
directly wired to his or her ego. It’s human emotion without reason as a group and
human reason without emotion as an individual. It’s how and why each individual
could be so brutal – they felt so good doing it. It’s how and why they were such
effective killing machines, as they could operate either in a group or alone.
Compare it to what you know: How hard does a group have to work to get even
one person to do what he or she would never do, such as convince a person to
commit rape only as the others in the group pressure him? How hard does a group
have to work to convince one person to do something ‘smaller’ like rob? It used to
be impossible in America; now it is common and nobody blinks. Kill reason first by
battering them with words, render them powerless – they must feel powerless both
mentally and physically – and then insert a new idea over a long period of time but
do it in such a way you make them truly believe it as real, ‘it’s America’, as you
cement it inside them with that one, massive, final blow: visual imagery, auditory
imagery – all of your senses being attacked - and with a wallop of emotion that
feels unbelievably fantastic. But I felt terrified. I know now that a person could have
held up a sign that read Kill The Jews and I would have heard that same roar as
long as the person ‘leading’ the crowd condoned it and so did the guy sitting next to
you. Hitler’s big lie only it is bigger and much more insidious than anyone ever
suspected.

1 16. At that exact moment it felt as if the water had risen over my head and I
was going to drown; I was actually going to die. I was going to suffocate. Nobody
was stopping it; I knew exactly what had to happen for mass violence to erupt. I
knew I could do something exactly and we’d have mass violence. And somebody
might do that accidentally. I took one look at that Veterans face and fled for my life.

11
He was silent and he had a look of confusion and revulsion on his face; his silence
was different as it was as if he couldn’t move. He KNEW something had gone
horribly wrong but he did not have the word “genocide” in his head or he would
have had a different look on his face. The person I attended this event with? That
person was cheering; he had no idea what had happened and when I fled he kept
trying to tell me that I was ‘crazy’ and making it up; he was absolutely clueless as to
what he had just been deceived into doing. He absolutely, positively did not hear
the lie he was just told, the lie of his life, the most lethal and deadliest lie of all:
They will think for me; I don’t have to think; I don’t have to feel. I can't do anything; I
don't have to act.

17. I then went back over the record of genocide that we have. Nazi Germany and
Rwanda are the same; it’s the same but it is realized a slightly different way. It has to
do with power and control; a created fear; there’s a rev up or a cycle; there’s an
event, a moment in time where it ripens; and if one thing happens after that point?
Mass violence will erupt unless the chain set in motion is broken. Genocide is
already, before mass violence erupts. You might slaughter people in one day or you
do it a few at a time in an illegal war or at home killing women; it might take you five
years to kill them all but it’s mass violence and is genocide. In person I can go over
this in fine detail and reason it all for you. I have to do this for all citizens but
especially for all political parties so they never go here again. I also have to break or
sever the chain set in motion with BVG as once it ripened? That chain was never
broken; it is still in motion today and is being realized various ways like the John Woo
memos discussing if they could invoke martial law to then use the military to lock up
Americans w/o cause, w/o any hearing or trial and w/o any charges. Yes, in
concentration like camps. Those memos are more serious than anyone knows. What
has not yet happened is the sudden explosion of violence, which is not so sudden but
only appears to be. If the American people want to know who the Hitler in their midst
is I will tell them and trust me, if I could not prove this beyond any doubts – not
reasonable doubt but any doubt – I would not say it: Dick Cheney. Cheney should be
very afraid of me, as there’s a whole lot of things that he did that he truly believes he
has gotten away with; things he is certain no one will ever know or couldn’t know,
things I can prove. I’m not ‘figuring out’ who did what as I know as fact without any

12
question whatsoever as following a chain of people is easy for me. It's obvious and
so self-evident to me. Cheney might believe he did something behind closed doors
so you can’t know but you can; if you have my unique skill you can follow that chain
anywhere and know anything.

This is all I want to say on paper as it's too important. But in 1947 logician Kurt Godel
had something to say about it and a federal judge shut him up too: Godel realized US
law had a flaw, a chink. He told Einstein. Upon Godel being naturalized? Godel told a
federal judge! Godel knew it was about natural birth and the Executive. From “A
World Without Time: The Forgotten Legacy of Einstein and Godel” Pages 98-99,
Amid The Demigods: "...Godel told his friend Atle Selberg, however, that he
volunteered after the war ended to serve as a civil defense aircraft spotter. He also
proceeded to formalize his commitment to the United States, becoming a
citizen of his adopted country in 1947. As witnesses for the ceremony he
brought along Morgenstern and Einstein. He had already alarmed the former by
confiding to him, in consternation, that he had discovered an "inconsistency"
in the Constitution. Apprised by Morgenstern of the danger ahead, Einstein
took it upon himself to distract his friend on the way to the swearing in,
entertaining him with worn-out jokes and twice-told anecdotes. Einstein might
have been even more concerned if he had known that for years the FBI had
been intercepting and reading parts of Godel's correspondence with his
mother, who was living in Vienna. The strategy proved unsuccessful. When
judge Philip Forman, who only a few years earlier had ushered Einstein himself
into the land of liberty, asked Godel casually, "Do you think a dictatorship like
that in Germany could ever arise in the United States?" he received a spirited
reply in the affirmative. Godel launched into an account of how the United
States Constitution formally permitted just such a regime to arise. Shrewdly,
however, the judge cut off the great logician before he could hit full stride, and
the ceremony came to a peaceful conclusion, leaving Godel's new homeland to
fend for itself against the opening he had discerned in its founding principles.
Years later, asked for a legal analogy for his incompleteness theorem, he
would comment that a country that depended entirely upon the formal letter of
its laws might well find itself defenseless against a crisis that had not, and

13
could not, have been foreseen in its legal code. The analogue of his
incompleteness theorem, applied to the law, would guarantee that for any legal
code, even if intended to be fully explicit and complete, there would always be
judgments "undecided" by the letter of the law. " Exactly, as you must account
for the spirit and as NO WRIT MAY EXIST AS WE’RE AMERICAN NOT BRITISH
AND YOU CAN’T CAN’T CAN’T REMOVE A KING VIA DUE PROCESS; YOU MUST
ASSASSINATE A KING OR WAR AGAINST A KING. Like you can't remove a
dictator or a bunch of dictators pretending to be advisers, party leaders, lawyers,
lobbyists and friends once he is entrenched by those who are unjust and are already
in power whose only interest is profit and the thrill of finding out how much they can
get away with before they are caught IF they are ever caught. Godel could know it's
possible; he just couldn't know exactly what or when.

Susan.

Letter to the Sioux:

SCOTUS is keeping the knowledge from you as you can't act to claim what I won if
you do not know it, can you? If you go to the SCOTUS website and look at the docket
for Susan Herbert, petition 08-6622, you'll see something odd: the US was to
respond by 11/05/08. But no response ever came. Then suddenly 15 days too late on
11/20/08 action is taken. But it is not a response from the US; it's a response from
the Supreme Court. That's because I won my case so they refused to file the paper!
The action dated 11/20/08 is an emergency application addressing the US' failure to
respond thus it is not the same as petition 08-6622 but a new action itself. By acting
to address the default but not file the paper as a new, separate action SCOTUS
meant to hide it from you as it seems as if it's all one action, as if it's all 08-6622.
However this then is SCOTUS violating all of your rights and even committing what is
a crime as it rises to a criminal action as it was intended to cause you harm.
Employees of the Court meant to harm you in a permanent manner and then did.
How can you be sure? In order for the Supreme Court to know the US failed to
respond I had to inform it. When I did on 11/20/08 I said: "It's contract law: The US
failed to respond in 30 days thus I win as the US may not rescind the contract only as

14
I fulfilled it. See Mermelstein V IHR ." I won; so SCOTUS never filed those papers to
then make it seem as if nothing happened as they knew you might never notice the
US failed to respond and even if you did notice? It wouldn't occur to you that the US
not the Court had to respond; that the Court may not take action w/o the US'
response as that is a denial of informed consent; SCOTUS banked upon the fact that
you'd never realize SCOTUS itself denied you your right of informed consent and
then every other right. The reason the SG responds on behalf of the US is to then
protect you, as the SG answers for you. It is also so every person can then file their
own response if they disagree (such as third party standing) or even enter their own
brief if it harms them still. Ask yourself: What would motivate an employee of the
Supreme Court to commit a crime? If I won the Ft. Laramie land back and then I won
the rest of my claims would that be a big enough reason for CORP US, the sitting
officers not The People, to then hide it? Would they risk committing a crime if they
thought you would never act against them as you would never know? YES. If the
stakes are high enough they would indeed and look - they forgot - they confessed in
writing on their very own docket. My true belief is: When they did this they did not
realize an astute observer could know what happened by using the docket only; they
did not realize the docket itself then would be the proof a crime occurred!

I'm deadly serious; if you look you will find my name, Susan Herbert, on the
Supreme Court of the US docket under 07-9804, 08-6622 and 09-6777. I mounted a
constitutional authority case of original jurisdiction and do not let appearances
deceive you as I won. "DENIED" in my case means SCOTUS is denying the truth
and so denying the Constitution, lol. SCOTUS is the court of constitutional authority;
it may not deny hearing to an authority case as SCOTUS answers to The People.
Once it denies an authority case a hearing in person? SCOTUS is a dead institution
of government and is no longer abiding by its original intent. All any person had to do
is use their one vote as an Executive Order and in so doing get around or out from
under Article III as Article III is cited by the Supreme Court and the judiciary branch
itself as a reason to then violate the spirit of the law. Use of Executive Order then
forces the Judiciary to comply with the law in both letter and spirit thus preventing
activist judges from making law and preventing racist and sexist judges from violating
it.

15
I entered the Supreme Court on paper enough times to demonstrate justice is now
made impossible. The People defaulted upon the governing contracts in 2000 by
failing to vote. Then SCOTUS committed a coup by hearing and deciding Bush V
Gore. As BVG is foreign to our Constitution as it has no constitutional basis or even
any rationale this was legal foreignization, foreign paper containing thoughts,
feelings, ideas and beliefs not within US law and not named by the Founders.
Knowing this I began suing in February of 2007 as a billion dollar buyout of the Office
of the Executive was announced and as actual foreignization - placing an actual
foreigner in the Executive - was being promoted. First SCOTUS violated Marbury in
07-9804 and that's great as the Ft. Laramie question was in this petition (SCOTUS
cannot and may not violate Marbury as if they do they no longer exist; what kind of
Justice reasons his own bench out of existence? Clerks pretending to be Justices,
that's who) and then the US, the sitting officers, defaulted by failing to respond by
11/05/09 (it was a choice: plead guilty or fail to respond as in 07-9804? The Solicitor
General waived everyone's interest and right in the Constitution including his own
right; he did this on April Fool's Day!) and then SCOTUS acted upon an emergency
application but refused to file it as then you would know I won the Ft. Laramie land
back and why Obama is so dangerous (I entered directly both times but this was
direct entry and direct action - PROOF OF OUR VICTORY - as SCOTUS may act
only if you make the case as your argument forces or causes that action) and at last
SCOTUS confessed: SCOTUS itself defaulted as I sued Barack Obama and John
Roberts and neither responded; in all other cases you may fail to respond and you
may deny the case without any named reason but not in an authority case, especially
a constitutional authority case of original jurisdiction. So what did I do? Well, as
SCOTUS has no office of judgment thus it is impossible to enter it in order to collect it
I sent it to the Sioux City Iowa Federal Courthouse so they can enforce the award by
adjudicating the commission so actual delivery can occur. I filed Susan V Obama,
Susan V Roberts, Susan V The SCOTUS Clerks, Susan V Mike Mullen And The
Joints Chiefs Of Staff and Susan V The Republican, Democratic and Libertarian
Parties as default judgments and I'm hoping to enter a motion of discovery soon
directing Barack Obama and John Roberts to discover the two governing documents
and the ruling that created the Supreme Court, read them, find their own person

16
within them or not and then deliver them to me. Not any old copy either; I will accept
nothing but the original paper documents signed in 1776, 1787 and 1803 held by the
National Archives. I've seen The Declaration and The Constitution in person; they are
already inside handy dandy see through glass cases - perfect for the trip from DC to
the Sioux Nation. All they gotta do is load them on the back of a truck and head west.

What's so special about my case? As it is a constitutional authority case of original

jurisdiction I already reasoned and decided the award. The person who is the case
decides it and then that person enters it. Instead of a petition containing thousands of
names you enter a petition containing one name, the same name as both the victim
and the counsel. As I'm my own client and then I'm my client's attorney I truly believe
I know best as to what will make me whole. Hey: If you couldn't decide your own
case then you wouldn't be the authority, would you? If I told SCOTUS once I told
them a thousand times: Requiring me to ask for a Writ creates an impossible
standard as the acting, legal authority does not ask you for what is already hers as
she claims it.

I know this is hard to believe. I did not seek publicity other than a few internet sites as
I wanted to come forward with the SCOTUS docket, a docket that took three years to
create. My legal argument is airtight because it is math and exact words based upon
Bush V Gore as nobody knew Justice Renhquist pulled a fast one, as BVG is actually
a tie. ANY dissent made it a tie as it is about absolute versus whole numbers, per
curiam is never used in SCOTUS as in the case of a Presidential election the math of
per curiam will never be good and it will always conflict with the Constitution, the oath
says "I will" not "my lawyer will" thus lawyers and dead paper were granted standing
and so the legal power of the office as Bush and Gore failed to appear and: The case
is Gore V FL. Since when does the 'winner' not named in the caption then appeal in
hopes of losing upon appeal? He doesn't; the people of FL won so Bush lawyers tried
to pull one of the slickest, oilyest, nastiest tricks ever by changing the caption to then
get inside SCOTUS as an "original" case. What case??? There is no case! Justice
Stevens even said these men are lying; they have no case. Think: FL wins! Is FL
going to then argue to lose in SCOTUS? Nope, so it should have ended there and
never have been heard in SCOTUS as it has zero basis in our Constitution. Bush

17
never had any legal standing at all but you know who did? The People, the
constitutionally set government of the US: I, Susan.

Bush lawyers needed to get inside SCOTUS so they changed the caption to sneak it
past you and it worked thus making a case that is devoid of any legal standing then
"original". I'll say as now SCOTUS is hearing pretend court cases that don't exist and
are lacking any actual legal issue. But boy, do they sound fantastic! You'd never
know they were completely made up. Take Carhart, a case in which no women are
present and men testify that they give birth to human babies. Or Schiavo, a case that
states death can and may occur even if life is not and never was and that rights for
women only exist after women are dead. Yes, as if you are not a life then no right
ever came into being. Castlerock says women have no vested interest in the
property, children, and that cops can renegotiate a contract, an order of protection,
against a woman's will thus making cops the persons she needs to be protected
from. BVG started this nonsense. What actual question are they asking in BVG? "As
FL did not kick Al Gore's a** hard enough may I, George Bush Jr., give it a go?" I
would have been FOR but they did not ask me anything. Nothing, as there is no
question: FL already answered it, remember? Gore V FL? Plus SCOTUS has said
over and over you cannot disguise a political question as an equal protection and due
process issue which these clowns did and what is it but a disguise and a political
prank if Bush won as FL won thus our vote was upheld but still appealed??? Is he
asking FL to change their minds? No, he is stopping us from doing that: Gore V FL or
Gore V Bush as FL was for Bush. Now it's Bush v Gore??? Any female voter could
sue with FL women having the greatest weight as this shut out any and all citizens
but targeted women as these men were granted exceptions, privileges and special
treatment when women are not granted what are fundamental rights.

Why would Bush lawyers do this? They're power hungry, immoral, criminal, ego
maniacs that's why and they wanted to make it seem as if they had been 'approved'
as the authority, as if they possessed actual and legal constitutional authority, but it's
math first as if FL had a recount because of the ballot we have enough people to
sway the election. A new national election was possible too. However: If you get it
before SCOTUS will 9 Justices be enough to sway the vote? 9 will never make up

18
the difference as it was around 500. I conducted my very own recount. Guess what
the answer always is each and every time? ONE! As in one for the Constitution and
one vote!!! A president is the living embodiment of the Constitution. 4 Justices are
against the Constitution and 5 are for it? LOL! 9 as 5-4 as 1 is bad math. You do not
subtract 4 from 5; that is a false appearance as by invoking per curiam it then is the
majority but not 9 as 5-4 as 1. It will never, ever add up to be 9 as 5-4 as 1 as to be
1, any form of 1 by itself, the court had to rule unanimously or Rehnquist had to
stand down Clinton so I truly believe late Chief Justice Rehnquist did this on purpose
to leave the door open as wide as he could for us as those are the Founders
instructions within Madison's notes: If this ever happens open the doors as wide as
you possibly can and so tip the pyramid on its pointy head. This then allowed one of
us to rise, as hope floats but liberty rises!

Throughout history man makes a mistake from which he cannot recover and so
government falls, as if traveling past the point of no return. Our mistake? BVG. I said
WHOA!!! This is huge; the largest single legal challenge ever in all of world history as
Natives, blacks and women have never been accorded any actual legal power as it
only seems as if their vote has actual legal power. It's a meaningless appearance as
men always negate it, like they foreignize it to keep us from any actual legal power
and they undermine our moral authority and strip it from us via use of physical force.
I do not know about you but look around - do these animals have any moral authority
over you? as they certainly don't have any over me. These people are either the most
brazen crooks I've ever met or the most dangerous. You know what I told the
SCOTUS clerks? You guys are geniuses, actual geniuses or criminal masterminds as
now I possess something you can never, ever defeat in any court: the official docket
of the Supreme Court which matches nothing but our federal criminal code thus
either the clerks hid the case from the Justices - they "sunk" it exactly like they
promised as they have motive, intent, means and opportunity - as I highly doubt
John Roberts acted but did not file the application and then hid it in the court building
for two or three weeks or we have a renegade, runaway court. Who cares what we
have as default means an automatic win for us!!!

19
Follow along: Marbury sues to secure a vote as before that it was only a legal
theory upon piece of paper; Thurgood Marshall sues to secure seat of Chief Justice
and Susan Herbert sues to secure seat of Executive: vote, Chief Justice, Executive
as each is equal in legal power and moral authority. In the US a persecuted group
does not have any actual legal power until or unless a person from that group sits as
Chief Justice or President as those two people stand alone and make law; they can
make law all by their selves via Executive Order or via the Chief Justice standing
down the President. As your one vote is equivalent to an Executive Order thanks to
William Marbury I wielded my own vote as such, ordering the court to place me on
the case conference list as that then constitutes service to all three hundred million of
you so nobody can claim they did not know. I issued my very own Executive Order
dissolving the lie and overturning BVG in favor of...MYSELF! You had to act pro se
thus be both the victim and the counsel as it's about the spirit of the law or your
conscience; a victim who is also the counsel enters first person sworn testimony; he
or she is an eyewitness to history as you live the case as you are the case.

I knew BVG was a violation of Art. 4 sec. 4 as the Constitutional Republic fell as if
SCOTUS may not make law which installing a President is then SCOTUS installed a
military dictator only. It's why we found ourselves in an illegal war declared upon bad
evidence. It's why men are waging war against women here both physically and
ideologically. Being the courageous soul I am I then placed my knowledge on the
record in a Philadelphia court in December of 2000 to preserve my standing as then
came the difficult part: Making the case itself. And then most difficult of all: finding a
way to tickle your brain as so beaten and battered are The People that they no longer
feel liberty as an emotion and no longer possess true belief; they no longer possess
inviolate faith that anything is possible and that no problem is ever too large for one
person to solve if only you are willing.

I will! I am!

Hey kids, this is America; the power of one is intrinsic to America. It's one man one
vote and one institution one vote for actual, constitutional reasoning. You are the just
cause, that's why.

20
We do not have any writ to cover this type of authority case as writs are British and
you can't remove a king via due process. You assassinate him or war against him or
today, if you actually are British, you might tax him to death. Americans may not tax a
President to death as that would be a Bill of Attainder. If you enter directly and force
direct action thus you made the case, it is, but SCOTUS still refuses to grant you
your living commission which is via the appearance in person? If SCOTUS refuses
to grant you entry to the bar in person as you hold no law license and mopped the
floor with the Justices? As you not only won all the Ft. Laramie land back but a whole
bunch of other stuff? Like the entire nation lock, stock and barrel? And as you
ousted every single solitary sitting officer in the corporate seat of Washington, DC
and then the rest of the country? You ask to have the actual
paper commission delivered to you as John Marshall said if that's you then you
have proved it is your fundamental right to receive it. You ask the court to
adjudicate the commission itself as the withholding of the actual paper
commission is now the violation of the fundamental right.

Will the mountain known as John Roberts come to the Sioux? I predict: YES!
Especially if he wants his job back.

Read the complaint against the political parties as it contains the means to secure
the land, Sioux City case; the Ft. Laramie solution is near the end but I want you to
read it all as it's very important; it's only 15 pages so no excuses! Then read the
latest petition 09-6777 (you can skip every question except the very first one as
there's a dozen pages of questions meant to fire up your reasoning skills), the brief
"Judicial Review Is The Myth Of Fingerprints" , the motion "The truth has left The
Building" and petition 07-9804 which is my first attempt and it's not so bad for a
beginner; I figured if I entered SCOTUS first then all other courts would be a piece of
cake. Then I figured the shortest distance between two points is a straight line so by
all means go directly to SCOTUS. It worked. 07-9804 is on Scribed - look under
Susan Herbert - and some documents are on a website constitutionalists in
Rockford, IL set up for us; it is: www.mycountrytisof.me . Everything is not in one
place, lol, as it's filed in the federal courts across this nation. You may or may not

21
 have difficulty understanding my points of law and reasoning at first as it's about how
we process language but you'll be fine; I wrote it for the average American not a
judge or lawyer. Think of yourself - a body of government and/or a body of belief - as
the law; think I am as in "I am a well regulated militia of one, charged with the duty to
defend myself against all enemies foreign and domestic" or "I am a constitution, a
Republic of one". I used plain old English not lawyerese; as my first cases entered
directly I had to cram as much as I could into the petitions as there's no lower court
record so if you want to preserve it you have to write it down. I never knew if I would
get in at all and if I did would I ever have a second chance? So I put everything I
could think of within it often 'hiding' it so nobody would ever suspect what was about
to come down the pike. If you do not write it down you can't argue it so if you wonder
why is she talking about that? or this is way too much extraneous and personal stuff
nope, as I needed it all. People laughed when they read it at first, as it seems as if I
do cover so much. Let's see them argue the entire universe in 40 pages.

It's a legal joke: I owed you; now we're even.

It's about actual allodial title, something that exists and is a real legal claim but is
supposed to be 'impossible' to prove. Within "A Summary View" Jefferson said it is
and you can but it will be extraordinarily difficult. I thought, Not if you're me and know
everything I know a part of which is: Native America. I filed the whole case April 4th,
2007 and claimed the Office of the Executive on June 4th, 2007 at 12:12:31 PM and
yes - the dates are important.

Susan, the acting, legal President and Commander of original jurisdiction as I am, as my
will, my reasoning, my one vote, my ability to add and subtract, the equal protection and due
process clauses, history such as the Revolution, Robert’s prior action and Marbury make it so.
You can and may and should take government into your own hands as you are the
government!

I, Susan Herbert, complain:

22
1. On 11/09/09 I, Susan, became the very first citizen ever to receive a default judgment
from SCOTUS. This happened as I have always known Bush V Gore referred to here as
BVG was and is a tie that served to uncheck all offices and strip all natural born citizens of
their vote thus all of their rights. It’s 5 as 1 versus 4 as 1, 1 v 1, as nothing else is legal nor
is it good math. It especially harms women and enlisted service members and harmed me
directly and grossly, until I suffered physical death but survived. Although this should be
impossible this is what happens when SCOTUS rules wrongly and so installs a President
thus makes law upon a case that has zero basis in our Constitution living or written and
when it then awards the Office of the Executive to lawyers not on the ballot giving legal
standing to pieces of paper not people so that SCOTUS has committed what constitutes a
coup and has overthrown the Constitution but then refuses to admit to what it did only as I,
Susan, the person who made the case happens to be a woman who is not a lawyer. See
attachments C and 5, Herbert V Obama also in this court.

2. There was a fire in my home so this is a few days late. It may take me a few more
days to send in one or two other parts of this case as the fire ended up destroying some
documents. The facts regarding the Libertarian, Democratic and Republican Parties begin
at number 7.

3. This complaint is brought under USC 1983 and USC Chapter 18 but firstly under the
Declaration and Constitution as acts of Congress, acts of SCOTUS with the other Judiciary
and acts of the sitting Executive past and current conflict with the Constitution as does law
the citizens made via a direct vote of The People as nothing within the Constitution, US
case law or US code allows for the citizens to make law via a direct vote, to violate the
natural birth, equal protection and due process clauses via a direct vote or to target women,
enlisted serviced members or me and my sons exactly via a direct vote. And nothing
provides for the violation of fully vested fundamental rights which go w/o redress and w/o
any actual remedy and relief as nothing grants any citizen not even Presidents and Justices
blanket immunity. See US V Nixon. I also have standing to sue to enforce a judgment of
default entered by SCOTUS and am in the correct court as the very first violation of a
fundamental right was perpetrated by the federal government while I and my children were
Navy dependents and this violation is directly linked to a former Executive and
unconstitutional policy he invoked as well as a crime he committed which Congress then

23
excused, as if it never happened. As it’s core this judgment of default occurred because
every single sitting officer I came in contact with and every single citizen reasoned and
decided they or other officers and/or lawyers were above the law while I and my sons were
below it or less than human and as they insisted that US law provided for no remedy and
relief. It is directly due to women never having been accorded actual equal protection and
due process and as women have never been able to bring the case for equality before
SCOTUS as it is either argued incorrectly, it is not heard w/o any reason or cause named,
men not women bring it, no pro se litigants are allowed before SCOTUS and
unconstitutionally so, and/or the person bringing it is unconstitutionally denied redress for
the violation of her rights perpetrated by SCOTUS employees.

4. Jurisdiction: 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 – 1412: I have read it and this venue then would be
proper as prior court activity occurred in this district and as this may be the only venue left
via process of elimination. Plus as this is an authority case ANY federal venue would be
appropriate as one of the concerned parties, female voters, lives here.

5. What began as a family case over custody escalated until I was challenging men
inside SCOTUS and even SCOTUS itself as ultimately they and it caused the injury. The
case spanned several states and was and is in court in three: NY, PA and FL. as the
creation of impossible standards then created legal limbo; either no action is taken thus the
case sits and sits or the states harm me with impunity.

6. The SCOTUS docket proves my claims – it along with me constitutes incontrovertible

proof - but in this unique case I must now sue those involved in order to address an intrinsic
flaw in the process which now denies us our rights in order to force sitting officers, whole
institutions and the voters to recognize the law and my person and so the equality of
women, the legal and biological reality they deny, or, to enforce the judgment of default.

7. Both major parties are guilty. I‘ll deal with the Republicans first: In the fall of 2004 I
went to a political rally sponsored by the Republicans at which George Bush Jr. was to
appear. Ultimately I received the shock of my life, as I am a witness to genocide born in the
US. For years sociologists have been looking for this answer as have I. Scientists could
name the elements and which conditions did not seem to matter; they could not name the

24
cycle or the pattern or if they had every element or how they came together. I can answer
this question due to the Republican Party.

8. Several elements do need to exist plus they do come together in a very specific way
and scientists are wrong: I now know what comes before the eruption of mass violence so
that I can state as fact what happened in Rwanda may have been longer in coming then
anyone ever imagined. The best way I know how to say it to a federal judge: An event such
BVG or 9/11 occurs; there seems to be an escalation of fear plus injustice. BVG is very,
very important – what it is and does to cause genocide is intrinsic – but 9/11 is not very
consequential because all it needs to be is anything the leaders can use as an excuse to act
unjustly or create more irrational fear, what I named suspicious fear: be suspicious; be
worried; your neighbor may be your enemy; you can’t see your enemy. It’s a rev up. Then
all necessary elements are realized in one time and one place and so genocide ripens. I
saw the event that no one ever saw before; when and how it ripens so that mass violence
may erupt. At this point it’s possible as the ‘machine’ is in place and the people did it once
so it is then alive and what I witnessed and what I know tell me that IS how Nazi Germany
was born and nobody realized it but not what Rwanda saw as Rwanda had no central cult
personality surrounded by ‘officers’ who actually did all the dirty work. However I can
answer the questions about Rwanda, as now I know what no other person ever knew.

9. This sounds awful; it is. Bush Jr. is not guilty; he had no idea what happened before
he arrived and I saw him flinch when a person held up a sign reading Jews for Bush. Why?
The hate speech, that’s why. I saw Jews cheering for their own extinction, women cheering
for their own extinction and enlisted service members cheering for their own extinction. The
news is not all bad: As I was there the US can now own up to it and then take credit for
giving the world an answer that can stop genocide forever. The whole event is on tape and I
have a witness: A Vietnam Veteran as it seemed that only he and I and perhaps a few other
Veterans knew something had gone horribly wrong. I, Susan, knew the exact word -
genocide - and so I became terrified and fled for my life.

10. We know BVG and everything that happened up to fall 2004 – a time before we knew
it is a bad declaration of war. The Republicans said you had to arrive 5 hours before the
event or you couldn’t get in. 5 hours in the baking sun in FL in a football stadium; it was an

25
oven. To get in you had to pass through ‘security guards’ – members of the Republican
Party or at least the guy who touched me was. They began roughing people up. They began
confiscating silly things only to throw them out as if you had to leave it they were dumping it
not leaving it for you to claim. So a mood developed.

11. Now we’re in the stadium. As it heats up the concession stands are charging
outrageous prices for drinks and food. You have five hours of this. Then the toilets overflow
all over the stadium. It is getting worse and worse and worse. I can feel the mood shifting
and I begin to realize what I might be witnessing but I keep telling myself it’s impossible. I’m
thinking this can’t be but I know genocide so the only word I have is ripen, maybe this is
how it ripens so then the possibility of mass violence exists at any time; maybe it’s not
possible until it ripens. I now know that’s it, it must ripen. Something is made physically real.
Exacting thoughts, feelings, ideas and beliefs along with motivation and intent combined
with issues regarding power, victimization, justification not justice and morals not ethics is
made real. The otherwise ‘good’ civilians doing it? They are the targeted victims and do not
even know it; they are unaware they have been actively ‘recruited’ to participate and so do
not know they have been deliberately targeted. This is important, as coming into play in
order to keep the recruited participants unaware is a cycle of blame, shame, anger and guilt.

12. A Vietnam Veteran sits down. Everybody is talking and he begins talking about John
Kerry; he’s not here to ask you to vote for Bush as he’s here to tell us: WHATEVER YOU
DO YOU CAN NOT VOTE FOR KERRY; EVEN DON’T VOTE AS LONG AS YOU DO NOT
CAST YOUR VOTE FOR KERRY. He has no idea who he’s voting for due to the candidates
– none of them are fit; none of them are safe. You’re either safe or not; safety is or not.
There’s no such thing as a little safety or a little liberty. So people start asking him
questions.

13. I listen to him talking and I stop him: I have a question: “I know about the Swift boats;
I hear Swift boat everything. Now you just said something – unfit for command. I don’t need
to know about Swift Boats. Why did you, a person not here to vote for Bush and a veteran
just say unfit for command like you did? What’s YOUR reasoning?” So he said, “He lied
about the return of his medals.” I reply, “Okay now I know: Violation of a renegotiated honor
bound contract. He’s unfit to command.” This happens to be one of the most grievous

26
offenses you can commit. You give up your medals as it is your claims THE PEOPLE have
violated the Declaration and Constitution wholly and absolutely in your case. You are no
longer a party to the contract. If things change and the contract is renegotiated the
President representing THE PEOPLE reawards your medals. At that point? You had better
not look sideways if looking sideways is a violation. A lie? A violation. Cheating? A
violation. Running for any office when not fit to serve? A violation. This nation needs to get
right with itself: all the proof I ever wanted or needed was that Veteran saying he came here
on his day off not to vote for Bush but to stop me from voting for Kerry. If he said or did
nothing else that is the proof. I believe Vietnam Veterans: I do not believe one of them: John
Kerry. How many veterans have to tell me if you elect that man you might be killed? 1. Not
2, not 20, not 75 but 1.

14. So all day long things worsen, it’s more heaped on top of what feels as if it is
unbearable, it’s like a sewer, until the hate speech begins. Like nothing I have ever heard in
my life. The speakers begin and it is insanity from the get go; it has been building up all day
as there were acts like musicians every once in a while so a person would grab a mike and
blurt something out or they would broadcast something to ‘entertain’ us while we waited. It is
a mixture of politicians and party leaders plus well known locals. An ex-Model named Kim
Alexis gives a speech. [Kim Alexis is a person, a good person, who then participated. Why?
I know why. This is my reasoning for naming her - not as she’s guilty but as she has some
of the most priceless living testimony ever as she was there and she did it but she did not
know.] From among the speakers she stood out as she’s a woman and a mother and her
words made my blood run cold. Certain words and slogans are repeated ad infinitum.
Bloody, bloody, baby, women, Christian, bloody, murder, and on and on. Men get up. Jesus,
bloody, baby, women, murder, drugs. THIS IS A CHRISTIAN NATION. Over and over and
over. You think it’ll stop or somebody will react but they do not. Now it’s bloody, baby,
women, WAR, JESUS, WAR, bloody, Christian, abortion, bloody. I’m getting more and more
concerned. I’m watching it all, taking it all in as now I know: I am about to see how genocide
is born; I’m gonna know – how did the Nazis do it, why good people did it and why the Jews
didn’t act. I want the court to note: I always knew I’d have to give this answer to the Jews
then the rest if the world. Once I knew I was actually seeing it? I captured it all in my minds
eye paying special attention to: the emotions. Those I captured in my body; you can sort of
internalize them to recall them later. It’s a gift, as I have an instrument that is perfectly

27
calibrated – my ears – as I listen different, with my entire person; I record or memorize
things differently than other people do. It’s related to how I process language so that I
experience the actual whole truth while others experience only a part of it or miss it
completely. I was experiencing the truth of the whole event in that stadium; others missed it
entirely while that Veteran knew most of it. That’s because: If your person matches US law
in letter and sprit, if you have those same beliefs and practice them, your emotional
compass is very finely tuned. Mine happens to be perfectly calibrated the way a perfumer
has a perfectly calibrated nose or a taste tester has a perfectly calibrated tongue. It’s what
makes me such a deadly constitutional attorney: If an argument or ruling – or a belief - does
not match the Constitution? I’ll know it and I’ll know exactly what it is and why. It will light up
like a Christmas tree for me. Then I can read what the Justices wrote and know: This is
what the lawyer needs or this is what they all missed or this is where the Justices erred.
Sometimes I will read one or two sentences and know; other times the caption alone will tell
me. Often I can even identify what mistaken belief specific people involved in the case have
as it’s all over the paper but they do not realize it, as they aren’t doing what I’m doing. As
people produce paper? I can listen to a piece of paper the same way I can listen to a
person.

15. The stadium feels like it is filling up with water, as if we’ll drown, and the crowd is
cheering insanely and then suddenly on the jumbotron is a JEWS FOR BUSH sign. The
crowd cheers; Bush flinches – he knows something is wrong as it is the way they cheered –
only he says something like “We’re a Christian nation but there’s room for Jews too.” And
there it was; it ripened: This crowd let up a roar EXACTLY like the People hearing Hitler let
out. It’s distinctive; I will never forget the sound and feeling of it. The extreme physical
discomfort; the extreme heat and smell of the overflowing bathrooms; the anger; the
nonstop hate speech; the imagery, very detailed ideas of graphic violence regarding women
and babies but labeled Christianity, mixed with the emotions that were swirling around as if
waves washing over the participants and the sound of that roar rising like an expectant
release of joy, eagerness, but joy for violence and death; a religious fervor for a political
agenda whether it is constitutional or not and no matter who it harms, so urgent even your
own person is expendable for the good of the cause. The sound that the crowd made in that
one incredible roar was deeper and more intense than any cheering I have ever heard but
the intensity of the emotion is what frightened me the most, as if these people were made to

28
be temporarily insane, actually insane, as they were feeling joy but expressing the idea of
blood and death for no named reason, so that expressing this insane idea purposely – This
is a Christian nation - to then feel that emotion became their cause and became their
reason. If they expressed that idea – those words in that order no matter how senseless
they are in the context of America - they were rewarded with that emotion – joy - so death
and the idea of killing women and babies made them feel good as it cannot be murder if
Christians do it. The emotion itself became their god; the emotion itself became their cause
and they would say or do anything to get it. I do not like to use the word joy, perhaps joy
infused with pride, you’re proud to be killing women in the name of Jesus, as to feel this you
need to have other people around you who engage in a sort of give and take. It’s as if you
need that outside approval to then feel the emotion, that to get that approval is to then be
able to feel it. I witnessed what happens when individuals have had their sense of self
annihilated to such an extent and degree that they then ‘adopt’ a collective created sense of
self, a sense of self that is located completely outside each person so that if the group
promotes it you then identify with it – you are it or so you truly believe – thus you feel good
when you express it, even it is insensible like equating Christianity with death instead of life.
You have traded your will for the will of the crowd; you have replaced I with us, not we. The
people in that crowd could not tell you what they were cheering for if you asked them; all
they could do is say exact words but not delineate any actual concept or any actual belief.
Human emotion without any reason; unconditional pride. The Nazis had unconditional pride;
it was their sense of self; it was directly wired to their id but that id only exists as a group. It
doesn’t exist if the group doesn’t exist. Each individual had wholly conditional love,
indifference, directly wired to his or her ego. It’s human emotion without reason as a group
and human reason without emotion as an individual. It’s how and why each individual could
be so brutal – they felt so good doing it. It’s how and why they were such effective killing
machines, as they could operate either in a group or alone. Compare it to what you know:
How hard does a group have to work to get even one person to do what he or she would
never do, such as convince a person to commit rape only as the others in the group
pressure him? How hard does a group have to work to convince one person to do
something ‘smaller’ like rob? It used to be impossible in America; now it is common and
nobody blinks. Kill reason first by battering them with words, render them powerless – they
must feel powerless both mentally and physically – and then insert a new idea over a long
period of time but do it in such a way you make them truly believe it as real, ‘it’s America’, as

29
you cement it inside them with that one, massive, final blow: visual imagery, auditory
imagery – all of your senses being attacked - and with a wallop of emotion that feels
unbelievably fantastic. But I felt terrified. I know now that a person could have held up a sign
that read Kill The Jews and I would have heard that same roar as long as the person
‘leading’ the crowd condoned it and so did the guy sitting next to you. Hitler’s big lie only it is
bigger and much more insidious than anyone ever suspected.

16. At that exact moment it felt as if the water had risen over my head and I was going to
drown; I was actually going to die. I was going to suffocate. Nobody was stopping it; I knew
exactly what had to happen for mass violence to erupt. I knew I could do something exactly
and we’d have mass violence. And somebody might do that accidentally. I took one look at
that Veterans face and fled for my life. He was silent and he had a look of confusion and
revulsion on his face; his silence was different as it was as if he couldn’t move. He KNEW
something had gone horribly wrong but he did not have the word “genocide” in his head or
he would have had a different look on his face. The person I attended this event with? That
person was cheering; he had no idea what had happened and when I fled he kept trying to
tell me that I was ‘crazy’ and making it up; he was absolutely clueless as to what he had just
been deceived into doing. He absolutely, positively did not hear the lie he was just told, the
lie of his life, the most lethal and deadliest lie of all: They will think for me; I don’t have to
think; I don’t have to feel.

17. I then went back over the record of genocide that we have. Nazi Germany and
Rwanda are the same; it’s the same but it is realized a slightly different way. It has to do
with power and control; a created fear; there’s a rev up or a cycle; there’s an event, a
moment in time where it ripens; and if one thing happens after that point? Mass violence will
erupt unless the chain set in motion is broken. Genocide is already, before mass violence
erupts. You might slaughter people in one day or you do it a few at a time in an illegal war or
at home killing women; it might take you five years to kill them all but it’s mass violence and
is genocide. In person I can go over this in fine detail and reason it all for you. I have to do
this for all citizens but especially for all political parties so they never go here again. I also
have to break or sever the chain set in motion with BVG as once it ripened? That chain was
never broken; it is still in motion today and is being realized various ways like the John Woo
memos discussing if they could invoke martial law to then use the military to lock up

30
Americans w/o cause, w/o any hearing or trial and w/o any charges. Yes, in concentration
like camps. Those memos are more serious than anyone knows. What has not yet
happened is the sudden explosion of violence, which is not so sudden but only appears to
be. If the American people want to know who the Hitler in their midst is I will tell them and
trust me, if I could not prove this beyond any doubts – not reasonable doubt but any doubt –
I would not say it: Dick Cheney. Cheney should be very afraid of me, as there’s a whole lot
of things that he did that he truly believes he has gotten away with; things he is certain no
one will ever know or couldn’t know, things I can prove. I’m not ‘figuring out’ who did what
as I know as fact without any question whatsoever as following a chain of people is easy for
me. Cheney might believe he did something behind closed doors so you can’t know but you
can; if you have my unique skill you can follow that chain anywhere and know anything.

18. I do not want say much more about this event on paper. It’s too important.

19. The Republican Party has a federal ruling against it involving voting in which they
were not do certain things again and guess what? They never stopped doing them and no
matter how many people pointed this out nobody did a thing to enforce that federal ruling.
Not in 2004 or in 2008. The Party has no plan to ever obey that ruling or so I was told.

20. The Republican Party is hoping to nominate Arnold Swarzeneggar to its ticket in
2012 and/or 2016. They have been promoting this idea all over. You know, first you agree to
seat a foreigner who doesn’t sound like one and then you can seat one that does sound like
one and when we complain? They will cry: If Obama sat why can’t Arnold sit? It’s a violation
of EP&DP to discriminate against people from Austria but not those subject to the British
Crown. Arnold Swarzeneggar will not sit in that office before I do, and then he’ll never sit in
that office ever, and Obama should not have.

21. The Republican Party is now placing unqualified people on its ticket; they know these
people are unqualified thus what they are doing is treason as they are overthrowing the
office of the executive, but they do it regardless. And at the expense of women, blacks and
American Indians. WAR VETERAN is not a reason to commit a crime; nor is it a reason to
violate our rights. I have a few choice words for John McCain as I too am a war veteran and
I too was a prisoner of war - we can compare scars – and I too was tortured – I can describe

31
intimately what torture is and does and what it feels like when you get to that point where
you’re gonna break or you’re gonna survive. I too had to make a choice: Do I cut and run or
remain a prisoner? For at least ten years? It would be ten years at the least. I remained.
McCain said he did it as it wouldn’t be fair to the other prisoners. I did it as I would not be
able to live with myself afterwards and as nothing would change my children would be
injured as adults; I did it as if I’m the only hope these people have – if I don’t do this it will
never be done and these people and this nation will die – then: I have no other choice. I
have never once used WAR VETERAN as a reason for anything let alone an excuse. I
know: I’m not above the law. I’m like everyone else as we all have one vote. Susan Versus
John McCain? McCain is never gonna be my equal when it comes to moral authority.

22. The Republican Party has manipulated and controlled the system and hogged the
ballot for more than a hundred years. It’s time for it to step aside. What happens? That’s up
to the People who are the Party. I would like to see some of the Republican and Democratic
Party leaders in jail but it’s not up to me; it’s up to the people who are the party and to The
People, the constitutionally set government. Republicans can volunteer to jettison the
leaders who did this, to begin obeying the law, to not assume one of the top two slots on all
50 ballots for the next few elections and work to fix how we even manage campaigns as
there’s a problem and a big one with PACS and I have the case as I am the case, or they
can volunteer to cease to exist.

23. The Democrats: The Democratic Party is a vile animal these days. If Kerry were not
enough they gave us Bill Clinton too. Do they HATE Americans or what? The Democrats
told us: We will elect anybody at all, even crooks and foreigners, as long as we do not elect
someone we actually victimized. You can appear to be black, you just can’t actually be
black. The Parties have both been engaging in propaganda and conditioning tactics. I don’t
know who’s worse. Like this: A person who is black tells me Obama is one of us and will
help us. One of us? Yeah, you know – a victim. Victim? Obama’s mother is white; she and
her family were not victims of slavery. Obama’s father is Kenyan. He and his family were
not victims of slavery. Obama claims to have suffered from discrimination. Nope, as look –
he doesn’t even qualify and he made it into the office. If it were discrimination he suffered
from then he wouldn’t be sitting. But you know how I know he is lying when he says he is a
victim? He looks like the majority population of Hawaii. Most Hawaiians are not white as

32
Hawaii has an indigenous population. He also grew up in Indonesia; he looks like the
majority population of Indonesia. He doesn’t really look different thus he was not treated
differently as in black versus white. This man is no victim; he only needs you to believe he
is. Listen to how careful this constitutional lawyer is: you do realize he was careful to say My
wife’s family is related to slaves and were slaves as if by being married to her he is then a
victim too? When I point this out to people they are stunned. They are not hearing it. And
then the things they do hear: Everyone can name Hawaii. So nobody stops to reason what
the Hawaiians who are Native look like? Yes as they are absoluting everything to death
instead of connecting it. Discrimination causes a physical injury; it actually affects your
brain. It causes your brain to sort of cross wires as it’s about annihilation of self. You
confuse id with ego; you lose the human ability to feel liberty as an emotion and physical
sensation. It truly does dumb you down. Nobody is hearing the truth due to the injury: Using
words to make it seem as if, a thing lawyers do too well. Democrats took it to a new level as
they used imagery too such as the “Office of the President Elect”, a make believe office with
its own podium, own news conferences and own great seal. People truly believe it’s a
named office. How severely have the people been injured? I found out: Incapacitation.
Lawyers did it for politicians and then did it for businesses; it escalated and became the
norm and went on for so long the people suffer a form of brainwashing named in the DSM. I
can fix it, as I know how to heal this injury. But I’ll give you an example of what this injury
does to a person:

24. I ask a person: “I believe John Kerry is unfit for command”. Is that a fact? The person
hesitates and finally She: Yes, Kerry is unfit. Me: I know if Kerry is fit or unfit. I asked you
about your belief not Kerry. You think there is a right or wrong answer, as if one is good or
bad. You were hesitating as you were trying to figure out what answer I wanted you to say
so instead you...answered a question I did not ask. I asked is this your belief? Is it a fact of
you? So, somebody in your world has taught you that some beliefs are good and some are
bad. Nope. They are. Now, did you even hear what I asked? Say that statement in your
head like this: If you ask me that same thing I’d answer this way: I, Susan, believe Kerry is
unfit. I do. Okay, YES, it is a fact – a fact of me; my fact is I do posses this belief. But you
answered, “Yes, Kerry is unfit.” Can you answer my question the other way? Can you
answer it ‘No, Kerry is not unfit’? You know what else? If I make that statement to you then
ask you if it is a fact? You can’t answer it at all unless you ask me what my belief is! When

33
this happens it is about self-awareness and sense of self. “I believe”: You don’t see quotes
when a person speaks!

25. People “can’t believe” what they did. They’re stunned. And guess what? The
Democrats exploited this very injury. How deep does this go? Deep as now it is everywhere.
LAWYERS did it to America. So did speechwriters. People are hammered all day long with
this, even on the news. Thus a person goes to a poll to vote and although they have been
conditioned to vote for a certain candidate they don’t know it so they truly believe they made
a choice born of will and liberty when no, they are operating upon that conditioning on a
subconscious level and then the carefully chosen words that serve to deliberately steer their
choice so it is NOT their choice and is NOT voluntary. This is exactly how bad it is and how
deep is it is:

26. A commercial now running says this: “Studies show 1 out of 4 women can misread a
pregnancy test”. CAN? As in ability? 1 out of 4 women have the human ability to....make a
mistake! Who reads a pregnancy test incorrectly on purpose? Who deliberately reads it
incorrectly? Or by accident? Oops! I accidentally looked at my own pregnancy test! No, it is
1 out of 4 women have the human ability to make a mistake. Now, what studies? It says
“Studies show”. Not even a recent study but a generic “studies”. You mean millions and
billions of our tax dollars went into finding out if human beings can make mistakes? Is it
possible humans make mistakes? And if possible do humans then act with deliberation to
make mistakes? Well, I gotta tell this court: I know what “studies” these are; I know every
one of them. Since the dawn of man we have tested, studied and determined mistakes. I
can even name the very first scientific study regarding mistakes ever made: Eve made a
mistake and we were off. Government was born! Ever since then we have thought about
mistakes, considered mistakes and examined mistakes. Man debates and argues and
promotes his mistakes in study after study. Man and mistakes: Our own Founders studied
mistakes. They went all over the world studying them. They read about them, watched them
and collected the details of them. They then designed the largest, grandest most important
study ever conducted to answer this question: Can man govern himself, or, is he doomed
to always and forever make a mistake from which he cannot recover? It took over 200
years for this study to be completed. In November of 2000 the study was finished. I was
floored: Why, it seems the Founders never considered what if the conclusion of the

34
experiment itself IS the mistake man never recovers from every time? What if nobody
knows the study has been concluded??? Or nobody knows the mistake??? Time to review
our mistakes! Is this the most perfect form of government on Earth? I am! I could have
saved that drug company billions. As it is they might owe me billions. Notice they aren’t
telling us that 1 out of 4 men make mistakes. It’s only women who have the human ability to
make mistakes as if men can correctly read a pregnancy test 100% of the time and perfectly
do everything 100% the time. Well, make no mistake: Every time I ask someone what that
commercial is saying they tell me that 25% of the time pregnancy tests are wrong as in the
test itself is defective but mostly, almost exclusively, I hear this: women can’t read them as
they are confused. As in can’t understand directions. Not one person realizes he has just
been told women can and do make mistakes 1 out of 4 times – if a pregnancy test is
involved. What? Do women make a mistake 1 out of 4 times when breathing? Opening a
can of soda? Hmmm, in all I do all day long am I, Susan, making a mistake 25 % of the
time? Will the Creator tell me upon death: Susan, 25% of everything you ever did was a
mistake. I’m not kidding: one woman said when she first heard it she thought dumb as in
such a dumb woman would need to go back to school and men have told me that they do
truly believe women are less than men – a SCOTUS clerk told me this and even said he did
not believe the Constitution applied to women and some of that is because of crap like this
as he does not even know he is absorbing it as fact and truth as it’s so subtle and feeds into
the pre-existing injury - and when I asked men about this ad some did assume it was
something women did like couldn’t read the test or the instructions; as if it was about how
women are: DUMB. Dumb is a state of being for women; it is a fact of men that women are
dumb. I understand directions perfectly; I follow them perfectly. Watch me perfectly follow
the directions in the Federalist Papers and so sue this company for LYING to the public thus
harming women as it implies and infers WOMEN ARE CREATED DEFECTIVE thus it is
their unchangeable nature and uses brain washing to do it. It says one of us makes
mistakes while three of us are perfect and that’s a lie, false advertising, as all women -
100% - CAN misread a pregnancy test so 1 out of 300 million Americans WILL sue: You did
not say 4 out of 4 women can misread a pregnancy test and I know why: The jig is up if you
said that, isn’t it? This drug company did not make a mistake. It acted with deliberation.

27. Exactly as everything these Parties did is deliberate. Don’t believe me? Joe Trippi of
the Democratic Party, the guy who worked for Dean, wrote a book; it’s called “The

35
Revolution Will Not Be Televised”. He told me to use the internet to steal this seat, to take
private funds for the first time since 1976 to steal this seat, and to figure out a way to
motivate the 47% of low income people who never vote to then vote if I wanted to win just
for the sake of winning as it was about winning. He even told me that I should look for a
minority person, as these voters are mostly low income. This sounds like a plan. That
somebody decided to follow to the letter: I saw a magazine cover that read (not exact):
“How the kid who owns Facebook chose a President”. It was all about how the internet,
namely Facebook, was used to seat Obama and that w/o Facebook no Obama. I, with my
own ears, heard Obama say he was going to take private money for the first time since
1976. Then I saw the Democrats desperate and scared. I also saw the wealthy men who
control them gleam as they knew: We finally managed to gain control of it all; all we gotta do
is make it seem as if we are electing a black person when really we’re electing a foreigner
as the only thing we can’t get past now is a victim...if an actual victim sits our goose is
cooked so we can make it seem as if but we just can’t elect a person who was one of our
victims. We can even nominate a woman who used to be a man but had a sex change
operation as long as it isn’t one of our actual victims. And a black guy who isn’t would then
motivate those 47% of the voters we’ve never been able to motivate...you know they’ll vote
for us thus making it seem as if he’s way more popular than he actually is. Nobody will ever
realize the actual numbers tell a different story and who will ever check the actual facts? We
can do this! Now, did I or did I not hear that this election brought out more voters than any
election we could remember? None of this is mistake.

28. Even if we assume everything Barack Obama ever said or did his whole entire life is
a fact it is also a fact that he signed 511. He unqualified himself then. But not one Party
member noticed? Not any members of the Democratic Party knew of that document? At
least two signed it. No Republicans knew of it? So what did they do? Did both parties
collude? As it seems as if they had a silent agreement to remain silent when 511 was
passed – approved by the Judiciary Committee – as nobody in either Party said a word.

29. The two major parties do not abide by their own party philosophy. If you look around
you can’t discern any difference at all between the two but if you then compare how they
act, what they create and how they vote against their platforms you see they do not follow
their own party ‘agenda’. This too is a way The People are being conditioned. A voter I know

36
was shocked, he actually did not know, when he realized that these people have zero in
common with their stated beliefs. He could not get over how very far from these stated
beliefs the party members act and that Americans aren’t up in arms and fighting back. He
truly believed his fellow citizens liked this, wanted this and were condoning and promoting
this until he read those platforms.

30. The Libertarian Party: They have a plank calling or foreignization. Or they did when
last I checked. That’s not free speech – it’s a crime known as treason as you’re organizing
and collecting money to then overthrow the Executive thus overthrow The People.

31. I’d keep going as I have lists and lists of things each party has done but it’s not
necessary as I’m not here to make a case as it is already made and won. I’m here to
enforce my judgment thus what I need is to be able to teach the people what they need to
know to heal the injury and to protect themselves from these nasty tactics in the future. I
also need these two parties to admit to everything they did and the Libertarian Party to
remove the foreignization plank if they still have it. As they’re so good at raising so much
money? They can offer me some. And big business had better not get any ideas as they
need me; this is gonna go one way or the other and so their only question should be “Do we
want to survive as a company?” as if you do then I am your only hope. Without me? You do
not have that hope as I’m the only person alive with the solutions as only I can hit China up
with a bigger fear than they named. Only I can exert power and authority over the likes of
China and then the other nations, as only I know exactly what to use and how to use it.
China wants to call in that debt the parties created and/or seize US interests? China said it’d
nuke us; China said it would bomb us. Too bad for China as that threat is empty and I know
it so all I have to do is tell planet Earth by giving it the science. The royal families of Europe
told me that they would NEVER give up the money they make off of the backs of their
American serf/slaves without their consent and against their will. Too bad for royalty
everywhere then as all I have to do is deal with one, Queen Elizabeth: You don’t want to
see it any way but my way as you made a mistake or you made the greatest, most
important decision of your life as you gave your subjects the right to dissolve you when you
agreed to pay income tax. I took the liberty of informing them in SCOTUS Petition 07-9804,
In Re Susan, as Gordon Brown is not my cup of tea and he refuses to hold a vote; I
informed them that all they have to do is order you to remove Brown so they can and will

37
vote in a person who understands what an honor bond is; that Brown has no choice but to
obey your order as the Queen defends her subjects – The British People - not any office or
title. Given a choice between Parliament and the Queen? If it means the British people
have actual power and authority thus control over their destiny and fate and that the
monarchy is no longer a meaningless, empty, vacuous, luxury hog with too much time on
their hands and too little to do then I know as fact without question exactly who the British
people will choose: Queen Elizabeth as she, not Gordon Brown, secured the right of
dissolution for them. The rest of European royalty had better start looking for jobs or merely
agree to see it my way thus act for the people they now lord over. Nobody, no nation on
Earth or even all of Earth acting as one, has more moral authority than the US so
businesses and the lawyers they hire can try it as can the uberwealthy and so can another
nation but they will lose each and every time as they cannot defeat what Susan owns: The
truth. My greatest concern?

32. I witnessed the Democrats do something I thought I’d never, ever see. I mean never:
Traditionally it has been very difficult to get American Indians to agree to harm
themselves. Traditionally they fight wars over this very idea, as they do not surrender
to what is unconstitutional. Traditionally their war cry is they'd rather be dead than be
injured by their own hand - I live in the home of the Seminole, the Unconquered
People, as the entire federal government with the US military couldn't defeat them -
and I’m Native American so I have no idea what Obama offered them that is so damn
attractive other than that false appearance and that is it: they have no idea they were
told a lie and that they are victimizing their own persons, that what the Europeans
couldn’t do to them in over 400 years and then the entire federal government and US
military couldn't do to them in over 200 of those years the Democratic Party did in
only a few months: They gave up their traditions, their true beliefs about
constitutional authority.

33. As long as a natural born American sits American Indians have the hope that they
can ascend to this office someday as currently they do not qualify. If criminals and
foreigners sit? There is no hope for any American Indian. No foreign power has any interest
in the American Indian and criminals by their very nature have no interest in the ethical.
They will, as question without fact, become extinct. [I love this Freudian slip; I’m keeping it.]

38
It has to do with dual citizenship and numbers, as we almost did exterminate them and they
realize the effects of discrimination distinctly, like persons who are black but in a distinct
manner as we prevented them from practicing their religion while blacks were able to
practice it. For all the advantages American Indians had over blacks that were brought here
in chains they suffer worse and the attrition rate is higher. It’s not only a compounding of
effects but of never having been able to achieve in any actual manner that then caused truly
effective change. They never had a Thurgood Marshall and they may be dead before that
ever happens if the injury is not addressed. You harm all children when you harm their
mothers and it is from your mother that you get your will, your ideas of spirituality and right
and wrong. If you harm mothers in such a way they can’t teach their children and then
compound that with outlawing religious expression so the entire group is existing on sheer
will alone you rip a hole in the group so wide and deep it is nearly impossible to survive, as
you can’t replace the people you are losing. You not only lose the physical bodies but you
lose the knowledge, the traditions regarding how to do things the old way and the sacred
traditions. It’s as if an always fatal disease is ever present among you so you constantly
teeter on the brink. All that kept American Indians from succumbing up to now was
constitutional authority. Constitutional authority allows American Indians to defy the federal
government. That kind of will is inviolate; I know as I have it. Man cannot survive on will
alone but if it’s constitutional authority he can survive long enough then get to a place
whereby he can thrive. If all American Indians had was that ego based will that is decidedly
European in nature they never, ever would have made it this long. It is the will born of id,
the same will our Founders had, that kept them going through it all. And for the first time
ever they are giving it away; they are being broken and do not know it. I, Susan, know as
fact w/o question that if this is not addressed American Indians will not survive as an ethnic
group and most likely will not survive at all as American Indians have not been able to
access any of our institutions. I do not mean government institutions only but all institutions
across the board. They have never been able to recover to a point whereby they could
begin thriving again. Constitutional authority is their only natural resource and they can’t
lose it before they are accorded justice or they will not make it. So I know, I absolutely know
that If somebody does not stop the Democratic Party and restore constitutional authority to
the American Indians the political parties are going to slaughter the American Indians once
and for all.

39
34. I, Susan, have a better idea than any of the political parties: The American Indians
told me they needed justice and that meant the land. Specifically the Ft. Laramie land. I did
not ask if they would accept something else. As no person ever revisited the issue on their
behalf I did. I, Susan, can and may return that land but my plan involves American Indians
becoming full citizens by choice, upon their own will and liberty without any force or
coercion. They can accept or reject my plan with zero consequences imposed on them by
the US. The use of the land patent gives American Indians the land back while preserving it
for all Americans and still allows them to live as a group, collectively. I can and will legally
argue a land patent that is royal in charter – the rarest of all - plus something else: I can and
will argue one that is divine in charter. The treaty I entered covers a part of FL, Spanish
granted by royal charter. Who gave the Spanish king the right to seize land in the new
world? This royal charter is derived from one granted by the Pope. As I’m catholic I then
pursued this papal claim all the way back to Jesus and then even earlier, to Abraham and
before. I can legally document it to the earliest Christian church due to the Vatican records; I
can then use sacred works that all match to legally prove it then goes back to Adam and
Eve. That’s legal. The law has evolved from what began as divine not secular law; our legal
roots are to be found within salvation history, the history of the metaphysical or of who and
what you are as a people. Later they became secular codes most notably when Mohammed
introduced Islam and most recently when we introduced the Declaration naming rights
granted by God, rights that are inalienable as they came into being with this universe.
Scientifically I can reason it all the way back to the void as I resolved Uniformity. I know the
design of the universe and how it all works. I know the smallest particle. I can prove
everything I claim. I’m not presenting anything like “We will find the Higgs particle when we
turn the collider on; it should exist”. No it doesn’t. It is not that as I already found it. I can
reason this fully so that anybody can understand it. I can even bring a simple experiment to
court so that the court can then see for itself. This answer was much simpler than anyone
imagined. The problem arguing science in a court of law? There isn’t a problem if you know
there is a legal burden of proof standard that is not the same as the scientific burden of
proof standard. Lawyers do not know what to ask for and scientists would never use what a
lawyer does so they have been entering the incorrect proof. Science has it but lawyers
never asked; when a lawyer asks a scientist for proof? A scientist is thinking controls,
laboratories and numbers. A court of law does accept that at times such as a court will
accept DNA. DNA may prove paternity while it would not prove evolution. Blood may be

40
entered as proof of a person having worn a shirt when he was shot and killed, a bloody
shirt, but it’s not proof until or unless the person who shot him says “He was wearing that
exact shirt when I shot him.” But blood alone would never prove murder. I know what a
court needs; I know what court of law needs, a court of science needs and even the Vatican
court needs. It’s not the same. As I can do this American Indians would have a land patent
both royal and divine, a land patent so inviolate all that can break it is the extinction of
American Indians, as I can argue it back to the beginning of the universe but in doing so
then also prove the Creator is reality and did create the universe and then the multiverse. I
can and will prove mankind truly did receive sovereignty over Earth from that Creator and
this then would give everyone what they needed and also give American Indians security as
land patents have never been ruled against by SCOTUS - they do not break less strict
ones; it has never happened and only the College of William and Mary has a royal one or so
I was told – plus it then makes American Indians a part of the electorate as our Founders
named land owners as the electorate and we are not ready to jettison that yet or so it
seems. American Indians would not only vote but elect the President thus making up for the
disparity they suffer. This is not only possible it is easily doable; it can happen any time this
nation wants to make it happen. It was not and is not impossible; all any person had to be
was motivated so they wouldn’t quit; all any person had to do was vow to succeed or die
trying and be willing to look at the problem any and all ways whether they personally liked it
or not. All any person had to do was accept it as fact: It’s the land or nothing and these
people have no reason to trust you so you can’t settle for what everybody else has; you
can’t offer them a solution that can then be violated by persons with everything already. To
that end I borrowed my idea from the Sioux: If a white man in 2009 gets a land patent, a
regular old land patent, or has no land patent but owns property, then secure for the ‘least’
privileged group the strictest, securest land patent of all. The white man then has a vested
interest in the Indian as that Indian is going to vote for the President and that Indian will be
here forever and ever as land patents do not expire when you die but pass on to your heirs
in perpetuity. The Indian has a vested interest in the white man as his land is not so secure
and the Indian can never afford to have this government fall no matter what or else he will
lose his inviolate patent to criminals and foreigners. Both then not only have the same
interests but power and authority is leveraged in such a way each needs the other. [This is
about allodial title, actual allodial title.]

41
 35. Do not worry: I have answers for black citizens – any and all minorities - and for
women and lots of them. You drove me too as I was never so livid as when I heard the
political parties say they couldn’t find one able, capable, qualified black person who is a
victim of slavery – the effects of which are still ongoing – in all of the United States. Not one.
You’re all as unable and as stupid as women are. They had zero qualified candidates as
they looked and looked and couldn’t find a single one. So desperate to find qualified blacks
and qualified women were they that they passed resolutions and made phony law to help
us: they empowered and qualified war veterans born overseas and half-Americans. I said,
“No – what you can’t have is one of two things: A person you harmed who means to get
revenge or a person you harmed who means to end injustice once and for all, as that then is
no more unjust privilege for you.” They are afraid; they are cowards. What they need to be
is ashamed and remorseful but I’m not waiting around for that to happen. I made sure I did
not enter until I could argue for everyone even if surprised at the last second. I had to be
able to do it cold, with no notes, no books, no help – nothing but my own person. That took
a while. It only became possible in 2006. I made certain I could bring everyone with me
when I entered the bar so when we begin again in 2012 with the vote we all begin together,
not all with the same wealth and same amount of material goods but with the same
opportunity. If I can do it with nothing then you can too but most of you have some
resources and you have something I did not: Me today with all of the answers as when I
began this I had only me without any of the answers. No person has to worry that I wasn’t
considering you as I considered all of you, even white men: I’m a hardliner: Equal protection
and due process is an inviolate law of this universe. It’s how you perfect the practice of
unconditional love otherwise known as the Declaration and the Constitution.

Susan Herbert

42