I need your input! A weapon of mass education is the goal!

I need to set your mind straight with a show on what this is all about.
This is work in progress, under Duress! Please watch;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkIKDKtRQuY&list=UUEs!"v#$%!I&'()%(*'vh&
The Declaration of atural !ights
T"I# A$$IDA%IT &$ "&'#T( should be submitted to any aggressor under duress, for
protection. T"' "&'#T( A$$IDA%IT, I# A T!'AT( &$ P'A)'.

A * !'+*TT'D A$$IDA%IT #TAD# A# T!*T" *TI, !'+*TT'D P&IT $&! P&IT,
In -. days A full disco/ery is re0uested. 1&TI& T& )&*!T
T"' #TAT' &$ 2222222222222222222 %# 22222222222222
I 'T'! T"I# full 3- A$$IDA%IT &$ "&'#T( As Protection for A,, %I)TI1# I
%I)TI1,'## )!I1'#, P!IT, #T*D(, #I4, AD #*+1IT. Then #"*T*P, ,et honesty
handle it! &$$I)IA, !')&!D.

)A#' *1+'! 2222222222 ame; 222222222222222222222222222222222222222
P!IT ),'A!,( as &$$I)'!
,RU, %! )-E!,Y
5e gi/e 6. minutes of my clients time to decide. They "AD (&* T"I# 1AT'!IA, 5IT"
!'#P')T, 7 I 4&&D 5I,,. *nder my contract They are to remain silent. They ha/e hurt no one.
+ut feel meet you under #T!'## AD D*!'## your chosen actions is inflicting on their life. If you
will in/estigate this, They should be free to go. The moment you recei/e this. 1y client knowingly
and willingly entered a pri/ate contract this package outlines in detail and full disclosure as protection
from you, 7 for you. &nce you know, (&* 8&5. I 'd )urtis, A lawfully, legally contracted
fiduciary pledged to aggressi/ely pursue, promote, protect, defend, and build my clients, safety, rights,
freedoms and happiness. I am on call 69:;: <=3 days a year. 1y 'mail is
wa..abehe#/0outlook.com , with a sole goal, #how o/er whelming force to free my clients in the
least amount of time and stress possible. ).ce the powe# o1 ho.esty is /iscove#e/2 "e will become
& RI32 4REE2 a./ sa1e .atio. a5ai.. It is the ultimate p#otecto# o1 law2 6ustice2 1#ee/om a./
you. 1y )lients P!IT A,, 36 PA4'#, #T*D(, #I4 AD 8''P *TI, ''D'D, They keep it
I T"'I! )A!, "&1' &! )&*!T !')&!D if needed! The number one rule and goal of law and
>ustice is D& & "A!1. I am no lawyer, I do not charge clients for my time but the ones who force
this contract. This is &T the common ?A ?P&IT# of law you ha/e always o/ercome, this is T"'
P&IT of law. This is &5 in your court, I$ you choose.
+y #howing &%'! 5"',1I4 $&!)' 5' A,, "&P' $&! P'A)'. If you choose war, I will
need to get this affida/it to the clerk of court right now for my clients protection. I will need you to fill
out pg 3. for future actions in my duties. 1y client will remain silent and offer no resistance or threat.
A simple 0uestion will be answered in 6- minutes. Do I #hare this with you or use T"I# for defense
against you@
1y client is now contracted, 7 instructed to hand this to you , in 6- minutes they will know, Are they
free to go or are you detaining them@ If detained, (&* ha/e re>ected this peace treaty, 5e are now at
war. (&* can not take my legal papers, they must be on official record, as defense $!&1 you.
Ignorance can be claimed only once, (&* caused distress, 1y contract re0uires your full
identification Apg 3., the end of this.B I ask, 5hy did you not accept this offer of peace@ Please write
and send your full answers. I 'd )urtis freely and publicly offer this personal contract in full
disclosure 7 free will to all who are captured in some kind of /ictim less crime spree. 1y clients read
it and agree enough to hand it to T"' #TAT', to remain silent, peaceful, to watch, and take names..
$irstly, 5e thank you for your work on our behalf. 5e feel your oath of office protections to uphold
and defend the )onstitutional pro/isions you ha/e made to the public is fair as it gi/es us peace of
mind to know that you are working for us to ensure our best interests are protected and met. 5e ha/e
confidence in your abilities to help resol/e this situation to all our benefit in the swiftest ways possible
by standing within the boundaries of your parameter and tending to the duties you ha/e offered,
agreed to, take paid for. (ou, and my fiduciary has pledged to secure law and "&'#T >ustice for me.
I place this file for public record, To you, Identified as T"' #TAT'. I will need your contact info Asee
pg 3.B, 1y fiduciary agrees to accept all responsibilities for my actions &nce you recei/e this, I am
incompetent at law and under a pri/ate personal contract that is now in effect. I agree to remain silent,
to not resist you in any way or be a threat to anyone. Again, 5e wish to acknowledge our thanks and
acceptance for your Public &ffering, professional assistance and of course, (our personal &ath of
office protections; This issue will cause great distress ha/ing to defend from things not under stood. I
wish to ensure that we competently continue to work together to clear any confusion that may eCist.
This was written with my client in mind, who agreed enough to hand this to you, for defense and we
welcome you to study it.. In 6- minutes, we will know who and what we want to.
1y re0uests are not meant to undermine your efforts and are re0uired terms to fulfill my contract; To
ensure that we A,, are on the same understandings so intelligent decisions can be made, It is written
out $&! (&*. I am not getting paid for this and it will cause a huge burden on life . $unds and time
are limited and we did not start this. 1y client did read and understand this and openly contracted with
me. I ha/e duty to share this knowledge with all. It would be a crime of conspiracy not reporting this.
This "&'#T( A$$IDA%IT PA)8A4' is designed to ser/e 1A( purposes in the matter of
>ustice and for the protection of all in/ol/ed. This co/ers e/ery crime T"' #TAT' %# my client
engage in that has no nameable /ictimD 8&5,'D4' I# P&5'!, Do you come in ignorance or
with malice is ...T"' P&IT. & %I)TI1 E & )!I1', the stand. 5e feel my client had the legal
duty to "and you this in defense and we all prey, yours. I 5I#" T"' ),'A!,( P!IT'D
#I4AT*!' &$ '%'!( "AD,'!
222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222
222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222
2222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222
222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222
To a/oid stress I instructed my client to remain silent,calm,cool 8ind 7 docile with all encounters,or
be in /iolation of our contract. In law, I am a contracted fiduciary, 1y client is now under fiduciaries
care. )lient is considered incompetent, under duress, 7 confused. )lient agrees to my terms and is
now under personal contract. I look out for my best interest in these matters of law, I put my name on
it. (&* pursue 1'. 5e offer this as a show of force of law, ,aw you might not know. In contract law,
if terms of contract are /iolated, a breach of contract %oids all claims, protections and obligations,
personally. In my best interest, I do not wish to pay for the persecution of my client by T"' #TAT'
and offer to help client pursue >ustice. In the best interest to all family, friends, neighbors, city, town,
state, and country. I, 'd )urtis am now personally responsible for all claims and causes of actions so
bring them to me personally. I , Did ha/e the right to remain silent. If my client feels damaged
defrauded, used or abused, by our contractual agreements, they ha/e e/ery right to seek redress for my
actions in any court of law. If any of this motion is made with intent to defraud anyone or defraud this
court, T"' #TAT' is responsible for legal actions against me personally. If I /iolated the law, In any
6
way, I A))'PT $*,, !'#P&#I+I,IT(. I seek to end my client sufferings and fulfill my
agreement as soon as possible in my and my clients best interest. I am not an eCpert, I am not being
paid and In honesty, work for the best interest of all. 1y client agrees to supply all court records
in/ol/ing these actions of his court eChibit and e/idence recorded, stamped and sent to me. It must be
noted that I am not skilled at law, I am not being paid, and (&* forced this action. This package
contains '%'!(T"I4 I feel rele/ant or needed to defend my clients actions from your actions.
#amples of; e/idence, parts of briefs, motions, affida/its, rele/ant points, disco/eries, and stands, are
included so we can close this matter in the swiftest matter. $rom direct eCperience, '/ery day brings
stress, damage and eCpense.. In -. days, If the state wishes to pursue, these matters, I will re0uire a
F-.,... *P $!&T retainer fee sent to 'd )urtis G a rate of F-H.. per day and F 3.. per day to my
client personally upon fulfillment of contract. &ur charges and damages will come separate. This was
read by client, 5e both agree with this.
This package was designed with client in mind, not your court, but 4i/en to you for *#, In A,, our
best interest. Take the time to study it, 5e prey, you will walk away. D!&P this in the fastest,
cheapest, way.II!I4"T &5. In honesty, 5e should '%'! "A%' 1'T &! $'A! lights in the
mirror, cops at the door, /iolations of rights or law you take pay for. The predator hunters of our time,
freedoms, money and life are now out of work here. &nce on court record, This protection is,
Promoted to the Public and on record. T"I# I# A blunt, bold, +!*TA,,( honest, 5"',1I4
$&!)' &$ ,A5, ,A5, 5ith my clients right to due process, speedy and public trials in mind.
This is 'J"I+IT A, e/idence, submissions proofs and points any court of honor will e/er need for
the protection of the public by a 4o/ernment sworn to protect $!&1 A,, ''1I'# +&T"
$&!'I4 AD D&1'#TI).
"onestly, (ou, 1e and my client are under contract, 4athering names and facts, seeking K*#TI)', for
all (ou who work in truth, we work with honesty..
5e seek copies of any ad/erse documentation that would superseded your oath of office contract you
and your coLworkers ser/ice for us that stands o/er or abo/e the oath of office as a public ser/ant
contract. Please send all documentation of any laws, codes, or statutes that you may belie/e states any
claims to supersede a contractual oath of office to uphold and defend the )onstitution of the *nited
#tates of America and all itMs human population. Please supply all contracts that bind, knowingly and
willingly, in full disclosure signed, that binds This human to this court $or inspection by fiduciary.
If any are made, then this would ha/e drastic implications and I feel that it is prudent in this immediate
situation to know for future actions.
I ask you to ascertain copies of the documentation that support any and or all allegations. $iduciary
thinks their is a massi/e seditious conspiracy to o/erthrow &*! lawful go/ernmentD that by /irtue of
accepting your contractual public NoathO it is within your duty to pro/ide all such /ital information or
documentation made in the name of T"' #TAT', +( T"' #TAT', for the good of the people.
5orking together, 5' 5I,, TA8' A +IT' &*T &$ )!I1'! in my clients defense I did con/ince
them enough to hand you this. I$ (&* A!' a American )itiPen of the American !epublic 5ho
solemnly swore to support and defend the )onstitution of the *nited #tates against all enemies,
foreign and domestic; I$ (ou took this obligation freely, without any mental reser/ation or purpose of
e/asion, and I$ you will truthfully discharge the duties of your office on which (ou ha/e entered on
oath and in (&*! personal word of honor,. 5' A!' (&*! +'#T $!I'D! T"I# I# A P'A)'
T!'AT( $&! A,, &$ *#. A separate personal, pri/ate contract only allows client to remain silent
and grant you 6. minutes of time to In/estigate This protection, fiduciary has offered 7 (ou ha/e
triggered with the need to present it to you. In 6. minutes, (&* 5I,, A#5'!, Am I free to go or
are you detaining me@ I will email you a copy for more study. If I am leading my client wrong, !eport
this crime. I /alue your professional /iew. I hope It will protect you from /iolating your oath and
damage your good name for political goals and with criminal actions.
5e both wish >ustice !I4"T@ 5e will
need you, you will need us to help round
them all up! A,, who continue playing
foreign agents 5I,, be deported as
<
DA4'!&*# illegal aliens when this system falls or face >ustice for the laws they /iolated under
&*! ,A5, Kudge this honestly is all we ask.
1( )&T!A)T T'!1# A!' %&ID'D 5IT" P!&&$ &$ %I)TI1.
This is a peace negotiation to end this here and now for e/ery ones good. o one is abo/e the law, o
one has the right to /iolate a lawful contract, any ones rights, or the law.
The law states that the minute you recei/e an affida/it, It is to be recorded. $ailing to do so is
crimes of obstruction of >ustice, statues sec; 39.-, 39.;, 39.H of crimes against >ustice and too many
others to list here. In crimes against in>ustice a conspiracy results. *nless you are QThe lawR, (ou do
not ha/e right to make legal determination, you do not ha/e the authority to >udge, and you do not
work for me. In honesty, only a criminal would deny >ustice. A crime way more destructi/e to all than
to break most of the-= million laws today. This is &T what you learned in your trainingSs but this is
&T what we all agreed to pay you for either. "ow does any paper gi/e anyone a right to rule o/er
me@ "ow )an anyone >ustify with a piece of paper the sub>ugation of others@ Do words on paper no
matter how fancy or by whom created gi/e you the right to force your beliefs on others@ )an one
>ustify the ensla/ement of men by a piece of paper@ )an one claim di/ine right o/er others@ Is there
anything in hea/en or earth that >ustifies sla/ery and in/oluntary ser/itude or eConerate the crimes of
some against others@ Is it a crime to stand on T"' P&IT of law@ In court we swear to tell the truth,
the whole truth and nothing but the truth but In honesty, 5hat is truth@ 5itches, Doctors,writers and
Kews were eCecuted by truth. It has 0uietly robbed, abused and ensla/ed us all, The more you
understand it, The more you will see it. 5hoMs truth is the T"' ,A5 based on@ #ome say the world is
o/erpopulated yet all the world could li/e in orth Dakota E comfortably. Truth has different
meanings for different people across world. It is a word that has been manipulated to pieces to fit the
needs of a different mentality, the ones that li/e to take and ha/e mutated into human predators. It is
T"' 5&!D that has destroyed countless li/es, our nation and threatens the world. "onestly, 5ould
(ou pay to ha/e another do this to you or put another in a cage at your eCpense, when they did nothing
to you@ Is not law for your benefit 7 safety too@ 5hat would I be If I did this to you, I 1( A1'@
5hat would gi/e you a right I do not ha/e if we all are e0ual@ The fact is, Truth has no solid meaning
especially in law. $or an eCample, say, (ou were caught smoking a >oint, in orth Dakota, you are in a
cage, your life destroyed. In )olorado, It is cool@ If you Dri/e your car without a license, you >L
walked, didnMt fasten your seat belts, did not pay or did not do something T"' #TAT' claims a crime.
They will come, They will kill if you defend yourself. (ou owe T"' #TAT' your time, (our money
and &+'DI')'@ 5"AT I# T"I# #TAT' if not me@ $or a law, I ne/er personally agreed too, Do
not benefit from but pay a lot of people to kill if necessary to enforce@ It is a law made to keep me in
line and under control, by (&*! ignorance. In honesty, who owns me enough to say what I can or can
not do if you hurt no one, Is it not the same for you@ 5hat is 4o/ernment but people@ Truth is a legal
trick word that made e/eryone a P'!#&, Asee &$$I)' &$ P'!#&B %ictimLless crimes are not
meant for humans but a fiction entity of QT"' #TAT'R, a fiction has & right to rule a human and
most work in ignorance of this. )ure ignorance and it will cure crime. Kust who has the right to
regulate and demand money for doing something without paying some fee@ 5ho has the right to tell
me what I can do, say, think, drink, smoke, eat or do if it only hurts me@ Kust who has the right to tell
me I can not tra/el, unless I "a/e a piece of plastic when T3U of accidents are caused by sober,
licensed dri/ers@ In honesty, we ne/er needed a dri/ers license. 5"AT 4I%'# A(&' T"I#
!I4"T@ To hide behind a word and not be responsible for their actions is why this )ountry fell. 5e
were all tricked by this word truth, It is not a honest word it scattered honesty to the winds. Is law for
my or your protection or is It for profit and power o/er *#@ 5A8' *P, T"I8! 5hy should I be
forced to gi/e you my pay or pay for putting a person in a cage, 5hy should they need to be in one@
T"' #TAT' )A D& &T"I4, IT I# &T"I4. IT TA8'# P'&P,' T& D& IT. Do T"'( ha/e
more rights than I do, (et work for me@ In honesty, 5hat is being produced is a growing predator
class that hunts, feeds and makes criminals for profit. It is in their training to see the millions of Qa
pointsR but ne/er T"' P&IT of law, >ustice, or "&'#T(. To think QI am only doing my >obR
remo/es responsibility for their actions when their oath is their word and what they are paid for is
*T#! 1y clients deser/e full due process, e0ual protection, an "&'#T, Aggressi/e defense with a
speedy and public trial. 1y clients deser/e K*#TI)', The one we pay you for. I will work by my
9
clients side As an eCpert witness and legal coach for laws I ha/e found in the same law books that has
been used on me. I was made a criminal for thinking their was e0ual protection of law, I learned a lot.
I will stand witness for my clients health, legal, human, 7 lawful issues this action raises. I pledge To
help end my clients distress, protect my clients rights, freedoms county and state for maCimum benefit
for all. This is blunt,bold, honest ,A5. ,aw is for 1( protection, not state profit. I am contracted
with my client until all issues with all actions are fully settled. And my client li/es,5ith maCimum;
safety, freedom 7 happiness. I A1 duty bound as $iduciary and eCpert witness for the accused. In the
best interest of my client, the state, the country and world. This education will end crime, racism, debt,
po/erty, and war. About e/ery problem we face today will be cured when ignorance is.. #'' my first
book; httpD::www.scribd.com:doc:H=39.6;=:ewLbutL&ldL8nowledge 5hen you T"I8
DI$$'!'T, this whole world will simply go away as you are fooled no longer. It is time to undo the
wrongs of truth and upgrade your thinking to honesty, or you will li/e with it. &nly an educated
society will make the upgrade peaceful. The people who do it should care..This is good for stopping
A,, the crimes of them who think the law is a tool to take, 5e come on a mission of peace with
"&'#T( and facts concerning &*! ,A5. '/ery one has a moral, legal and human duty to his
family and neighbors, town, city, state, country and all our kids to eCpose, confront and report crime.
This is '%'!(&'# duty. &nce it is in the open light, It will simply shri/el and die as crime can not
work in the light, now you know.. This affida/it Is sent in good will but under duress, At great
eCpense, under threat, and as personal protection in all matters T"' #TAT' has interest in this client
for. It must be placed on court record, rebutted or dismissed within -. days, In writing.
5hen this system falls, (&* 5I,, face an angry, destroyed nation unless you understand this. (ou
will ne/er look up and keep feeding off us all until you are stopped. The matters you and my client
meet has acti/ated a pri/ate contract. 5ith all Public #er/ants in/ol/ed. 5e Accept (&*! &ath
)ontract To uphold and defend the *# constitution and the oaths your subordinates, whom, you are
also responsible for, who also swore to protect and defend the )onstitution, the integrity of law, and
this community. I submit this affida/it, eChibit, motion and redress for you to ha/e entered into court
record as reaction to your action.
Please check the ones that do not apply to (ou, me or my client.
- L 5' ha/e the right to specifically reser/e any or all of rights 7
6 L I ha/e the right to remain silent Ato stand muteBA3th AmendmentB
< L I ha/e the right to say what I want and to be heard A-st AmendmentB
9 L I ha/e the right to represent myself Spro perS
3 L I ha/e the right to &b>ect to any statement by the >udge and:or prosecutor.
= L I ha/e the right to !efuse AdismissB the >udge
; L I ha/e the right to call 5itnesses to assist in my defense A=th AmendmentB
H L I ha/e the right to ha/e legal )ounsel for my defense A=th AmendmentB
T L I ha/e the right to conduct my defense Spro perS, free from the professional restrictions imposed
upon licensed attorneys.
-. L I ha/e the right to submit 1otions and be herd
-- L I ha/e the right to a fair trial
-6 L I ha/e the right to Appeal any >udicial decision
-< L I ha/e the right to a speedy, public and fair trial by an impartial >ury A=th AmendmentB
-9 L I ha/e the right to wai/e court and transcript costs, on the basis of
pleading Sin forma pauperisS Ano moneyB
-3 L I ha/e the right to due process of the law AtrialB, before I am depri/ed
of any liberty, property, or money A3th AmendmentB
-= L I ha/e the right to a face the inured party claiming damages AArticle III
and =th AmendmentB
-; L I ha/e the right to face my accuser and witnesses against me A=th
AmendmentB ,
-H L I ha/e the right to inform the >ury of the Truth, their rights, and their
duties A -s t and =th Amendments B
-T L I ha/e the right to put the >udge on notice of my intent to preser/e my rights
3
6. L I ha/e the right to put the >udge on notice of my intent to Appeal any
ruling or decision during the case
6- L I ha/e the right to Protest and &b>ect if any of my rights or demands are not being met
66 L I ha/e the right to demand that the court place in e/idence, any
*n re/ealed contract, statute, law, rule, or information being used against
me A=th AmendmentB
6< L I ha/e the right to challenge all rele/ant laws in this trial in terms of their intent, interpretation,
fairness, enforcement, and whether they #er/e and Protect the People of this #tate
69 L I ha/e the right to personal liberty under the -<th Amendment
63 L I ha/e the right to challenge the >urisdiction of this court
6= L I ha/e the right to argument of recourse and remedy, under *)) -L
-.< 7 *)) -L6.<
6; L I ha/e the right to demand that the code be construed in "armony with
the )ommon ,aw.
6H L I ha/e the right to re0uire translation of any citation of law or procedure
into plain 'nglish.
&TI)' of 1iranda warning and understandings of law is made in good faith. And full disclosure,
packed in the smallest package possible. This is some of T"' P&IT# A# T& P!&#')*TI&#D
After you ha/e gi/en your name, badge number, rank and proof of agency, you will ha/e the right to
remain silent. Anything you say from that point forward can and will be used against you in the form
of criminal affida/its and ci/il sanctions. (ou ha/e the right to counsel present during any
interrogations or ci/il disclosure. I will need all names for honesty affida/it promotions, and actions
D'1AD# T& +' 1'T +( &$$I)'! T& A%&ID )I%I, AD )!I1IA, P'A,TI'#
-. 5arrantLless ArrestD (ou are not to arrest my client unless you ha/e seen them commit an arrest able
act or omission, or ha/e eCigent circumstances to cause the arrest. If you are arresting my client
without a warrant, you must I11'DIAT',( take my client before a >udicial officer of competent
>urisdiction, to determine whether the arrest was lawful, or if there was enough probable cause for the
arrest, pursuant to clearly established law. This demand must be met prior to booking. If you do not
comply with this Demand you will be sued and charged with kidnapping under color of law. The
#upreme )ourt has held that the courts are open twentyLfour hours a day, se/en days a week, three
hundred siCty fi/e days a year. I once spent T days before I saw a >udge@
6. If you improperly arrest my client without a warrant in your possession, or with a warrant that does
not comply with The $ourth Amendment re0uirements, you will be sued in your IDI%ID*A,
capacity. #ub>ect to personal name promotions for this honesty affida/it, 5e will go to the >ury of our
peers nation wide. $rom personal eCperience, in my clients best interest, 5ith a website like
httpD::thefaC.webs.com: I# the only protection from professional thie/es and traitors hidden in fiction.
<. Arrest *pon 5arrantD the arrest warrant must be in your possession.
An affida/it and probable cause statement attached to the warrant as subscribed in The $ourth
Amendment to The )onstitution for the united #tates of America must support it.
The arrest shall not be based upon hearsay, unless supported by a warrant accompanied by a bona fide
affida/it. #aid warrant and affida/it must be based upon firstLhand knowledge of the Affiant charging
my client with a felony or other infamous crime. 1y client must be allowed the right to face accuser.
If you deny my client that right it will be a /iolation of The #iCth Amendment, and if you act
unreasonably in your in/estigation or use eCcessi/e force, it will be considered abuse, assault 7
battery, official oppression and in /iolation of The $ourth Amendment, and se/eral others of which
/iolate established law. (ou #tepped out your office of protector of the peace and are open to criminal
and ci/il actions.
9. If it is determined later that the warrant was in/alid, you will be held liable for This assault and
battery, false arrest and sued in your &$$I)IA, capacity and conspiracy of QT"' #TAT'R.
3. (ou may not take property or wrongfully con/ert any of property, such as personal photographs or
my fingerprints without written authority. #uch is granted only after an ad/ersary proceeding which
complies completely with The $ifth and The $ourteenth Amendment due process rights, concluded
with a signed order by a >udicial officer of competent >urisdiction ordering the taking of said property.
=
=. must be gi/en contact their outside counsel or friend. 5AA+'"'!DV&*T,&&8.)&1
;. must be gi/en pencil, paper and ade0uate access to a law library, to prepare my ?habeas corpus.? I$
(&* I4&!' T"'#' 5A!I4#, it will show bad faith on your part and prima facie e/idence of
your deliberate indifference to )onstitutionally mandated !ights of my client. A copy of this
instrument will be prima facie e/idence of your bad faith.
(ou are a Public #er/ant, and as such you are eCpected to treat all with due respect.
This &TI)' has been submitted upon demand of a #tate issued pri/ilege, permit or license and
therefore is a mandatory part of the official record of any ensuing action and 1*#T be introduced as
prima facie e/idence in said action. It will be noted that willful suppression of e/idence is a felony.
Any cause for action will result in a lawsuit under *#) Title -H, Title 6H, and Title 96, -TH< AD
$&! $*T*!' A)TI&# , I feel 1y clients rights are 1( !I4"T#, you are messing with 1( 4&D
4I%' human rights They are &T (&*!# to gi/e, take or manipulate. !ebut all misunderstandings
in 5riting. !ead this entire package and let it go.
"&, 7&R, )4 !&88 -), 9E I-4RI-$ED 3&- Y)U -), U-DER !,&-D?
This go/ernment can ne/er gi/e rights, they are not yours to gi/e or take.
Any ob>ections to what I assume to be true, #"&*,D +' !'+*TT'D,you are the professional.
1'1&!AD*1 &$ P&IT# AD A*T"&!ITI'#
-. Arrest is presumed to be false; officer has the burden of proof. The only thing the plaintiff needs to
plead and to pro/e is either A-B that the defendant made an arrest or imprisonment, or A6B that the
defendant affirmati/ely instigated, encouraged, incited, or caused the arrest or imprisonment.
+urlington /. Kosephson,
5hen the plaintiff has shown that he was arrested, imprisoned or restrained of his liberty
by the defendant, ?the law presumes it to be unlawful.? People /. 1c4rew,
?The burden is upon the defendant to show that the arrest was by authority of law.? 1cAleer /. 4ood,
=3 1ackie /. Ambassador, -- P.6d = A-T<6B.
?Any arrest made without a warrant, if challenged by the defendant, is presumpti/ely in/alid...the
burden is upon the state? to >ustify it as authoriPed by statute, and as not /iolati/e of constitutional
pro/isions. #tate /. 1astrian, +utler /. #tate, A1iss -T=HB
?As in the case of illegal arrests, the officer ... must keep within the law at his peril.? Thiede /.
#candia,
6. 1ust show warrant upon re0uest ?"e must show it to the accused, if re0uested to do so.? #mith /.
#tate, 6.H #.6d ;9; A1iss., -T=HB.
?If demanded, he must produce the warrant and read it to the accused, that he may know by what
authority and for what cause he is depri/ed of his liberty.? #tate /. #haw,
?An accused person, if he demands it, is entitled to ha/e the warrant for his arrest shown to him at the
time of arrest. )rosswhite /. +arnes, -69 #.'. 696, 693 A-T69B.
?A special deputy is bound to show his warrant if re0uested to do so, and if he omit, the party against
whom the warrant is may resist an arrest, and the warrant under such circumstances is no protection
against an action for an assault, battery and false imprisonment.? $rost /. Thomas,
?It is doubtless the duty of an officer who eCecutes a warrant of arrest to state the nature and cause and
the substance of the process which gi/es him the authority he professes to eCercise, and, if it is
demanded, to eChibit his warrant, that the party arrested may ha/e no eCcuse for resistance.? #ho/lon
/. )om.,
?It was the duty of an officer who attempts to make an arrest to eChibit the warrant if he has one.?
Kones /. #tate, --9 4a. ;T, <T #.'. H=- A-T.-B
<. 5arrant must be /alid A constable >ustifying an imprisonment under a warrant must show that the
warrant on its face is legal, and that the magistrate had >urisdiction of the sub>ectLmatter. Poulk /.
#locum, < +lackfords
A warrant is regarded as insufficient and thus /oid if, on its face, it fails to state facts sufficient to
constitute a crime. 5hartonSs )rim. Proc., -6th 'd., /ol. -, p. -36 A-T;9B.
9. no rubberLstamp ?signature? ?The *nited #tates #upreme )ourt ... stressed the need for
Sindi/idualiPed re/iewS to a/oid the issuance of Srubber stampS warrants.? #tate /. Paulick, 6;; 1inn.
-9., -3- .5.6d 3T= A-T=;B.
;
3. $alse arrest is assault and battery ?An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so
attempted to be restrained of his liberty has the same right, and only the same right, to use force in
defending himself as he would ha/e in repelling any other assault and battery.? #tate /. !obinson, ;6
Atl.6d 6=6 A-T3.B.
?An arrest without warrant is a trespass, an unlawful assault upon the person ... where one is about to
be unlawfully depri/ed of his liberty he may resist the aggressionSs of the offender, whether of a
pri/ate citiPen or a public officer, to the eCtent of taking the life of the assailant, if that be necessary to
preser/e his own life, or pre/ent infliction upon him of some great bodily harm.? #tate /. 4um, =T
#.'. 9=9 A-T-.B.
'/ery person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest in pre/enting such illegal restraint of his liberty,
he may use such force as may be necessary.AAd/ised not tooB
=. o handcuffs if client is being mo/ed when pose no danger, A&#"AB
?+ut a constable cannot >ustify handcuffing a prisoner unless he has attempted to escape, or unless it
be necessary in order to pre/ent his doing so.? 3- ,.!.A. 6-=.
?The handcuffing was utterly unlawful.? &sborn /. %eitch - $oster 7 $in 'ng !ep <-;.
;. 4o immediately to magistrate Ano photographs, no fingerprintingB
The one arresting has ?a duty to immediately seek a magistrate,? and failure to do so ?makes a case of
false imprisonment.? "eath /. +oyd, ; +rock /. #timson, -.H 1ass. 36.
?To detain the person arrested in custody for any purpose other than that of taking him before a
magistrate is illegal.? 8ominsky /. Durand, -6 Atl.6d. =39 A-T9.B.
?Any undue delay is unlawful and wrongful, and renders the officer himself and all persons aiding and
abetting therein wrongdoers from the beginning.? *l/estad /. Dolphin,
?The taking of the plaintiffSs picture before con/iction was an illegal act.? "awkins /. 8uhne,
?The power to arrest does not confer upon the arresting officer the power to detain a prisoner for other
purposes.? 4eldon /. $innegan, 636 .5. <;6 A-T<9B.
?)ompulsory fingerprinting before con/iction is an unlawful encroachment...NandO in/ol/es prohibited
compulsory selfLincrimination.? People /. "el/ern, 6-3 .(. #upp.
&TI)' 1&TI& T& !'#'!%' A,, !I4"T#, I still wonder 5"( this is needed with all the paid
protectors of our rights and freedoms we pay for@ #ince all courts re0uire either a /alid contract or a
damaged /ictim or both for a court to ha/e lawful >urisdiction, It is now motioned that a contract or
/ictim be placed into e/idence or said >urisdiction is challenged and /oid for lack of e/idence.
Proceeding will be considered treason, #ilence is conspiracy, and deliberate indifference is betrayal
and breach of contract. It is further motioned that the officers of the courts are under oath and attest
that they are in fact members of the >udicial branch of this ,A5$*, go/ernment and not under a
foreign >urisdiction of )ongress of the *IT'D #TAT'#.
I feel you may ha/e been tricked and failed to remain in your office, or why would we meet@ 5hy
would you remain silent, conspire, or /iolate rights and your lawful duties you collect pay for@
-.I do warn you, 1y time is not free, I will bill each and e/ery officer of the court, personally for my
time and F-.,... per /iolation of )onstitutional rights /iolated or ignored. I will seek full prosecution
of the guilty for breach of contract and The )!I1'# committed, Indi/idually, and do it publicly.
6. Do you fully understand these charges you pursue@ Do you; *nderstand the implications and
accusations presented in this defense@ D& (&* acknowledge and act in accordance with the *#
$ederal court ruling to wit to the cases below@;
A. The claim of )onstitutional rights can not be con/erted to a crime 1iller %# *.#.
+. The )onstitution is a written instrument, it does not change in meaning.
*.#. %# 8ruikshank.
). #ilence can only be e0uated to fraud when their is a moral and legal duty to speak.
D. A contract made in fraud is null and /oid in a lawful court of law.
<. All officers swear to abide by oaths to the )onstitution of the *nited #tates Article %I clause 67< of
the *# )&#TIT*TI&. It is the supreme law of the land.
9. That It is (&*! D*T(; To pro/ide full due process of law pursuant to Amendments;
-,9,3,=,;,T,7-9 of the *# )onstitution and other rele/ant amendments of your >ob descriptions with
the )onstitution as re0uired.
H
3. That All officers swear to pro/ide e0ual protection of the law with no eCceptions.
I now ask you as my public ser/ant. D& (&* &T TA8' 1( PA(, To respect, protect and defend
each and e/ery right of this plaintiff, An American citiPen in this matter 4uaranteed by all oaths of all
officers of my lawful 4o/ernment@
D& &T; All officers swear to uphold the )onstitution as the #upreme law of this land and
agree to help fully prosecute and bring to >ustice A,, actors working under color of law, with no
>urisdiction thus /iolating all concepts of law and >ustice and bring open fraud on this court and
damages for this /ictim@ I# &T T"' &,( %A,ID !'A#& $&! ,A5 to protect each and e/ery
human beings AT*!A, indi/idualSs rights@ I# T"I# &T T"' '##')' &$ !'A, ,A5@ I will
be blunt, bold, obnoCiously honest but "&'#T. I A1 on record in this court because you wanted me
to be.
I am confused by (our thoughts, actions and in actions towards me. (ou, as Public &fficials, &fficers
of the court, skilled at law and pillars of the community. Is The way e/eryone *#'D T& see you, I see
you different, '%'!( action taken, will be met by !' A)TI&. It is not my fault we met. &f your
own free will, (&*, ha/e #worn an &ath to Defend, Protect, and Preser/e the )onstitution for the
united #tates of America against all enemies, both $oreign and Domestic, or are a liar and terrorist or
ignorant. I ha/e to ask tough 0uestions if I want your honest answers for client.
&TI)' &$ )&*!T D'$I)I')I'# on record, until now.
+efore the abo/eLreferenced action can proceed, the following deficiencies in
the )ourt of the #tate must be resol/ed. These deficiencies includeD
-. o effecti/e counsel is a/ailable@ The accused has diligently searched for counsel that is unfettered
and not beholden to the plaintiff. It appears the only persons who are allowed to be )ounselor are
those who ha/e taken a solemn oath to support the plaintiff, the #tate Attorneys are also officers of the
state and ha/e a duty to see that defendants are punished for /iolating plaintiffSs laws. Thus, the first
duty of attorneys is to the courts, not to their clients and when duties conflict, their duties to the court
must take precedence. A#ee ; ).K.#., #ection 9, page H.-LH.6, $ootnotes 3< through 3=B. It seems
impossible to obtain counsel that can present 1( side of the conflict because an attorneySs first loyalty
is to the Plaintiff.
The accused is not 0ualified to represent himself and is unwilling to wai/e his right to effecti/e,
unbiased counsel. 5here can an attorney be found who can practice law in your
state who is free to effecti/ely counsel my rights and is not beholden to the plaintiff@
6. The >udge has taken ?loyalty oaths? to support the laws of the plaintiff. "e is an employee of the
plaintiff and is paid large sums of money to enforce the will of the plaintiff. "ow can the >udge be
neutral and unbiased@
<. '/ery >uror is a member of the state and is, therefore, one with the plaintiff. Kurors are also re0uired
to swear oaths to support the plaintiff. They, too, recei/e
small amounts of money from the plaintiff. #ome >urors also recei/e large sums
of money from the plaintiff in the form of go/ernment >obs or handouts. Kurors
ha/e an intimate and long standing relationship with the plaintiff, but ha/e ne/er met the accused.
9. The law enforcement witnesses ha/e a /ery close relationship to plaintiff
and are not impartial. They are paid to go out and enforce the plaintiffSs laws and
then to testify in court to facts that will help win plaintiffSs action.
The whole li/elihood of law enforcement officers depends on doing the plaintiffSs will.
3. This court was created by the plaintiff. #pecifically, it is an administrati/e unit of the legislature and
is only a court in name and not in function. It carries
out the will of its creator, the plaintiff. Therefore, the court itself has been fettered
to the plaintiff and is not an impartial tribunal.
It is clear in the -T3H &regon #upreme )ourt decision of #tate eC rel 5ernmark /. "opkins A6-< &r
=;HB that the >udicial power of the lower courts is under the arm of the legislature, instead of being a
separate branch of go/ernmentD
#ince amended Art %II authoriPed the legislature to abolish or remake the county
court, and the legislati/e assembly, in embracing that power, retained only the
T
name of the body, but changed it from a court to an administrati/e unit we belie/e that the conclusion
is warranted that so far as Art J%, #ection 6, is concerned, the legislature created the county court of
)ass county. L Aemphasis addedB
#tate eC rel 1adden /. )rawford A6.; &r H6B eCplains further the wide powers
the legislature now has o/er the courtsD
"ence, under #ection - of Art %II, as amended in -T-., the #upreme )ourt is
the only court created by the constitution itself; all other courts are to be created by legislati/e act.
If an appeal is made to the courtSs decision, it is handled by the appeals court
that was also created by the plaintiff. A&!# 6.3-.B Thus, the plaintiff makes the laws,
employs the police to enforce the laws, and finally ad>udicates the laws in the plaintiffSs
own courts. Is there any chance for a fair, impartial trial when
the >udges, prosecutors, public defenders, >ury and witnesses are not >ust
paid by the plaintiff L they are the plaintiff!
=. Public ,aw T;L6H., T= #TAT. -6--, -TH6, affirms that the +ible is the 5ord
of 4od and recogniPes our need to study and apply the teachings of the "oly
#criptures. The +ible declares that Kesus )hrist is the highest authorityD
Then Kesus came to them and said, ?All authority in hea/en and on earth has
been gi/en to me.? 1atthew 6HD-H Kesus )hrist instructs usD
5hy do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brotherSs eye and pay no
attention to the plank in your own eye@ "ow can you say to your brother S,et me
take the speck out of your eye,S when all the time there is a plank in your own eye@ (ou hypocrite, first
take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will
see clearly to remo/e the speck from your brotherSs eye.? 1atthew ;D<L3
This ?court? is attempting to take the speck out of the missionarySs eye, while
ignoring the plank in its own eye. This ?court? is blind because of its many structural defects and
cannot possibly see to remo/e any defects from the accused.
As Kesus instructs us, ?If any one of you is without sin let him be the first to throw a stone? AKohn HD;B.
The court must first correct its own defects before attempting to correct the defects of the )hurch
missionary. If the court is unable to resol/e its own deficiencies, then it cannot possibly see clearly to
correct any deficiencies of the )hurch.
I ha/e some 0uestions for the court record that the )hurch has answered. Please
correct the )hurch if the answers are in errorD
W. 5hat constitutes a fair trial@
-. An ade0uate hearing and an impartial tribunal, free from any interest, bias, or pre>udice. The !eno,
).).A..(., =- $.6d T==, T=H.
6. A fair and impartial >ury and a learned and upright >udge to instruct >ury and
pass upon legal 0uestions, and an atmosphere of calm in which witnesses can deli/er their testimony
without fear and intimidation, . . . and in which truth may be recei/ed and gi/en credence without fear
of /iolence, $loyd /. #tate -== 1iss. -3, -9H #o. 66=, 6<6.
<. An orderly trial before an impartial >ury, and >udge whose neutrality is indifferent to e/ery factor in
trial but that of administering >ustice. #tate eC rel. +rown /. Dewell, -<- $la. 3==, -;T #o. =T3, =TH,
--3 A.,.!. H3;.
+ias or pre>udice either inherent in the structure of the trial system or as imposed by eCternal e/ents
will deny oneSs right to a fair trial. A fair trial in a fair tribunal is a basic re0uirement of due process.
)onsidering human nature, neither party to a dispute can be trusted to render >udgment >ustly. A third
party can do so only if he is unbiased and fully appraised of the facts.
5ho created this court +ut The #tate. 5ho is the plaintiff in this action but T"' #TAT'
5ho pays the >udge, district attorney, public defender, witnesses, >ury and staff +*T 1'@ 5here is
the impartial third party whose neutrality is indifferent to e/ery factor in the trial eCcept that of
administering law against me, &T >ustice for me or society@
There is none. "ow can plaintiff legally try its own cases@ &nly if plaintiff acts as lord o/er the
accused witch is a human rights /iolation a form of sla/ery, a crime against humaniaty or please
pro/ide proof the accused has, 8&5I4,( AD 5I,,I4,( %olunteered to be sub>ect to a
-.
foreign >urisdiction court. If not, It is my duty to report this crime as a crime would be committed by
me not reporting this crime as my duty to all.
$or the record; This )hurchSs lord is not T"' #TAT', I do not work for T"' #TAT'. I work for 1y
,ord, the 8ing of kings and ,ord of lords.
1y religious beliefs do not consent to allowing a human being to be tried in a secular tribunal
?owned? by the plaintiff. or does this missionary member, submit or claim to be a part of the state or
under its super/ision of a foreign entity in any way. ?o man can ser/e two masters? A1atthew =D69B.
*pon what authority does this court use state /ehicle statutes to >udge a missionary of their personal
'mbassy, tra/eling under the >urisdiction of the 8ingdom of "ea/en in witch no mortal rules@ This
1issionary has not knowingly consented to ha/ing his 4odLgi/en rights or duties to tra/el from place
to place eCercising rights to be >udged by an administrati/e tribunal of the legislature. A1atthew
6HD-HL6.B I am not aware that the #tate has super/isory authority o/er Kesus )hrist or my church. If
the state insists on trying the )hurch missionary, I re0uire, for my clients protection a court that is not
beholden to the legislature, a court that is part of a separate >udicial branch and free to hear
)onstitutional issues related to separation of )hurch and state. I re0uire a fair trial, due process, e0ual
protection, impartial public >ury and court with the assistance of effecti/e, unbiased counsel. *ntil
these basic re0uirements of due process are met, 1y missionary is not ready to proceed without your
answers and it is costing me time, money and life. )onsider all this changed to my clients who retain
me as protection from you. To ensure a fair trial, The state agrees to retain me with an up front
F-.,... retainer fee and a running bill of F-,H.. a day, and help seek damages for my client
sufferings. To assure "&'#T >ustice is done. 5ithin -. days, I will eCpect a disco/ery and retainer
fee. This billing will start then. I 5I,, Testify to damages done in the name of the law, by T"'
#TAT'. A,, people +'"ID fictional co/ers, agents in the name of the state for T"' #TAT' against
A,, the state, +( predator dri/en laws for profit, 5ithout a /ictim, but all who pay for this. (ou
made my client your /ictim doing this...(ou stepped out of your oath of office and are personally
liable for your actions. I wish my client immediately submit this 36 page honesty affida/it into court
record personally, by friend, or by aggressor that holds them with proof of ser/ice, court stamps and
public record,G mailed to me for our records, 1y client has no say beyond the agreed upon contract.
Please send all disco/ery, court record, motions, and affida/its to
'd )urtis
T69 3th.#t s.
$argo, orth Dakota 3H-.<
This eCact draft is a/ailable free in PD$
httpD::phpromoweeblycom.weebly.com: for each and e/ery official, in
e/ery capacity that is paid by T"' #TAT' or entity other than specific human being who stands
/ictim on record. I wish '%'!(T"I4 in this file disco/ery mailed to 'd )urtis in -. days. This is
court eChibit of samples of disco/erySs, motions, briefs, re0uests and rebuttals entered into record here,
I learned to use my spy grid to record on ser/ers e/erywhere as the courts I faced do not listen. In 6.
days, a website will be a/ailable to all. This is not from a court /iew but from a /ictim. I look out for
the best interest of my client from lessons learned. I seek no fight with full disclosure up front 5ho
should I ha/e to@ If you need more time, I wish it recorded in court record, for court eChibit and
defense. 5e will ad>ust this with your names actions, reactions and remedy
http://www.sc#ib/.com//oc/::(;<=>:?/&44ID&%I,@)4@)-E!,Y
It isnSt right for men to >udge their own cause, 5e will seek a public >ury by promoting you , you are
the aggressor of your own actions, not T"' #TAT' . Ignorance of the law will not eCcuse any person,
either ci/illy or criminally for the actions they knowingly take that makes a /ictim. Is T"AT &T
,A5@ I# T"AT I# K*#TI)'@ to change this to #*IT courts needs, wants and re0uirements 5I,,
)&#T 1&'(.I$ not disputed,in writing in -. days, $iduciary will consider this matter done. If 5e
will need to proceed until remedy and >ustice is ser/ed and bills paid we will. If this does not end,
websites, promotions and emails of this 5I,, commence. As fiduciary, I do not trust courts, ignorant
>uries or officials, (our ignorance is considered cured. (ou pursue with malice
--
& !')&!D; 5e 5I#" A,, D&)*1'T# !')&!D'D AD & !')&!D (&* "A%' I
(&*! $I,'# +&T" client AD #TAT', $&! #T*D(.
Today, 5' 5I,, DI#)&%'! 5"& (&* A!'. I li/e in one of the most corrupt state, in the most
dangerous countries that has e/er eCisted, this is fact. 5e are +( $A!, The most brainwashed,
poisoned, robbed, numbed down, regulated, indebted and ensla/ed people this planet has e/er seen,
some one did did this.. 5' A!' this worlds most dangerous terrorists and (&* or the * will be
helping straiten us out for the good of the world, 5hen this system ends.. Their will be public trials
and with our massi/e spy grid, we will seek to be recorded on a lot of ser/ers the longer this action
takes. *#' T"I# I$& for your personal wants and needs for bringing back honor to you!
I ha/e a right to bill for my time and duty to seek tort damages in ci/il, human and )onstitutional
rights /iolations in criminal court. I ha/e a right to e0ual protections under the law. (ou in/ited my
client into this and I am in demand of e/erything you plan on using against my client to meet my
contractual obligations of +&T" our contracts.
$I!#T !'W*'#T $&! A +I,, &$ PA!TI)*,A!# DI!')T'D T& A,,'4'D )omplainantSs -L
3,... protected behind and under co/er of the agency, The )IT(, T"' #TAT',T"' )&*T!( ;
?!e0uest for a +ill of Particulars?
IT'!!&4AT&!I'# for me and client asked
-. Am I entitled to a fair hearing@
6. 5ho has the burden of proof or burden of pro/iding a
preponderance of e/idence@
<. Am I presumed innocent of e/ery element of this alleged crime or alleged action at hand@
9. Am I supposed to be informed of the nature and cause of the charges and proceedings against me@
3. Is there e/idence of a complaining party@
=. Did I /iolate someoneSs legal rights@
;. If yes, then please specify which rights /iolated.
I feel that my client cannot get a fair trial in these proceedings unless I know e/erything.
iB Q 5e are all entitled to a fair and honest trial, 5I,, my client !')'I%' &'@R
iiB Q)an you please answer , who is the in>ured party in this case@R
iiiB Q 5ho might (ou and the Kudge represent, @R
-. Please pro/ide a copy of the contract, signed by both parties binding me and the #tate in an
agreement. A unilateral agreement is not acceptable.
6. Please pro/ide me with a +ill, with the words XbillM and X/alueM upon the face of it,
signed by a member of the #tate .
<. Please pro/ide proof of claim that you know what a ? Person? is legally speaking.
9. Please pro/ide proof of claim that I am a Person or aXPassengerM and not a $lesh
and +lood li/ing sentient 1an with unalienable rights.
3. Please pro/ide proof of claim that there is any real money backed by anything of
/alue with which to pay this alleged debt.
Please note that you addressed your otice to X1! 'D5A!D D. )*!TI# which is a legal entity, a
fiction, a trade name. Please certify whether or not you or A( Kudge is acting as trustee for this
person, &! 1( ),I'T $or and on the record I am the representati/e for the legal entity &$ 1(
),I'T
Affiant is simply a $reeman ,i/ing on the ,and and I offer my hand in Peace to the court. who has
harmed noLone, your actions ha/e harmed my client. I reser/e all of !ights and 5ai/e none of them. If
you force fiduciary into making a special appearance to settle the matter; an eCpense of FT.. per day
for eCpert witness testimony will apply.
-6
Affiant will happily accept any claims made against him upon proof of claim that you ha/e any
authority o/er him. It is my understanding that; all men are created e0ually under one )reator, and, 5e
are sharing this eCistence together under 4od, and, 5e ha/e been gi/en the ability to make decisions
for oursel/es.
#tatutes ha/e the force of law under mutual consent of the 4o/erned, under full disclosure. The
4o/ernment is a !epresentati/e +ody and, !epresentation can only come from consent, and, It is my
!ight not to consent to said representation, and, To deny me my !ight is in +reach of the ,aw, and
those guilty will be fully liable and punishable within )ommon ,aw. These are not my clients claims
but the fiduciarySs stands
Therefore be it now known to any and all concerned and affected parties, that I,'d )urtis, a $reemanL
onLtheL,and do hereby state clearly specifically and une0ui/ocally my intent to peacefully and
lawfully eCist free of all statutory obligations restrictions and maintain all rights at law to trade,
eCchange or barter time with my client in working for the best interest of all parties in the goals of
ending these contracts.
I claim the right to practice my spiritual beliefs, without scrutiny or in0uiry lest it be from the le/el of
,aw,
II claim the right &T to apply for licenses, permits or to seek permission to do any actions that are
already ,awful,
II claim the right &T to pay into any system which I feel does not benefit me,
II claim the right to protect myself and my lo/ed ones against any unL,awful intrusions, and the !ight
to use $orce under the ,aw, only in protection from armed or dangerous aggressors.
II claim the right to culti/ate any plant, #moke, drink, ingest, any substance being fully responsible
for my actions II claim the right to be free,
II will only appear in court when there is a man or woman claiming I ha/e infringed upon one of their
4od gi/en rights or freedoms, and I claim the !ight to a >ury of my peers and due process,
IThe failure to define between the atural man and the #tate created $iction is nothing short of fraud,
theft, breach of trust and forced sla/ery, a heinous criminal acti/ity of the most odious form.
II claim the right to be ignorant of legal procedures as I do not understand them.
II claim that these actions are not outside my communitiesS standards and will in fact support said
community in our desire for truth and maCimum freedom.
II claim that anyone who interferes with my lawful acti/ities after ha/ing been ser/ed notice of this
claim and who fails to properly dispute or make lawful counterclaim is breaking the law 7 cannot
claim good faith or color of right and that such transgressions will be dealt with in a properly
con/ened court de >ure.
II claim that the courts in the !epublic of the *#A are deLfacto and are in fact in the profitable
business of conducting, witnessing and facilitating the transactions of security interests and
I furthermore claim that they re0uire the consent of both parties prior to pro/iding any such ser/ices. I
learned the people I faced cared not of me and learning to go public is T"' )*!'.
II claim all transactions of security interests re0uire the consent of both parties and I do hereby deny
consent to any transaction of a security interest issuing under any Act for as herein stated as a
$reemanLonLtheL,and I am not sub>ect to any statue, code or Act contrary. I think and prey that my
client is saying the same thing,
II state that it is my duty to )laim such rights, to protect them and ensure they eCist for future
generations. Their is only 6 sides of a fence.
I$urthermore I claim the right to use a notary to secure payment of the aforementioned fee schedule.
&n our books, A collection agency is being trained for this upon collapse of this script. +ut not all this
do me and my client agree, It is >ust me.
Affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make their own counterclaims must
respond appropriately within T' A-.B days of ser/ice of notice of this action. !esponses must be
under &ath, and in writing upon full commercial liability and penalty of per>ury. 1aybe an affida/it@ I
do not speak for client but prey they think ?('#, 5"AT "' #AID!? as you read this.
-<
Affiant re0uests the Prosecuting Attorney to supply A,, answers to this fiduciaries 0uestions for
disco/ery and needs.
This information is re0uested to assist in defending against charges brought by the )ounty of )A##,
$or T"' #TAT' &$ &!T" DA8&TA, AD A,, T"' &$$I)IA,# T"AT "ID' then TA8' 1(
PA( T& P!&T')T and defend the natural rights of the people who li/e on the lands.
&+K')TI&#D
&b>ections to all or any portion of an interrogatory shall be set forth with specificity sufficient to allow
the alleged party propounding these interrogatories to understand the eCact scope of and reason for the
ob>ection. 5here an ob>ection relates to only a portion of the information re0uested in an
interrogatory, all other information not within the scope of said ob>ection shall be pro/ided. ,egal
terms used in these Interrogatories which are not specifically described below shall ha/e the meaning
pro/ided in the statute, regulation, ordinance or other legal authority from which term is deri/ed, if
any, or in my edition of +lackMs ,aw Dictionary. Any other word or term used in these Interrogatories
which is not specifically defined below shall ha/e its ordinary and customary meaning and usage. I am
not a lawyer, I do not speak your law, I am human I do not understand the nature and cause of the
charges, proceedings, goals, >urisdictions, Kustice forced my client into.
!'#P&D'TM#

!espondents in this matter factually areD
-.B $or the record and in few words, A,, &$$I)'!# of this court.
(ou Are all Agents and actors of these actions,bonded as re0uired by #tatutes of QAn Act )oncerning the
&fficial +onds of &fficials@ I ha/e heard of a seditious conspiracy to o/erthrow my lawful
4o/ernment and wonder, who would fraudulently act in both professional and personal capacities
within this )&*T(,and #TAT', as one of the people a regular citiPen of state, defined in Article II
)onstitution of orth Dakota, specifically not welfare enumerated; in propria persona, sui >uris, li/ing
on the ,and within the boundaries of )ass county, in orth Dakota, one of the united states of
America by an act of )ongress at T #tat. 936; with eCpress and eCplicit reser/ation for all *nalienable,
%ested atural, Inherent,human, ci/il and common ,aw !ights, account abilities and responsibilities
whether enumerated or not in the )onstitution for the state of orth Dakota. #&1' &' is
committing massi/e criminal acts and:or omissions in this matter such as the )ass )ounty District
Attorney Aa public ser/antB for all his acts and:or omissions in this matter, claimed to be a resident
therein, and thereby comes under this courts >urisdiction.
6.B T"' )&*T( &$ )A##, I# an incorporation or undefined fiction whom was present in the )&*T(
&$ )A##, #TAT' &$ &!T" DA8&TA, and was acting in both its professional and personal
capacities for all its acts and:or omissions in this matter, and was resident therein, Aas a public ser/antB
and thereby comes under this courts >urisdiction.
<.B The P'&P,' &$ T"' #TAT' &$ &!T" DA8&TA, was an incorporation or undefined fiction whom
was present in the )&*T( &$ )A##, #TAT' &$ &!T" DA8&TA, and was acting in both its
professional and personal capacities for all its acts and:or omissions in this matter, Aas a public
ser/antB and was resident therein, and thereby comes under this courts >urisdiction.
9.B Kohn and Kane Does - through 3,... P,*# were >oinder parties to this matter by acts and:or
omissions, and either natural born, fictitious, or corporate entities, corporations, organiPations, state
-9
agents, state actors, state or federal or third party agencies, not bonded as re0uired by the #tatute of
&!T" DA8&TA passed $ebruary 6H, -H3., QAn Act )oncerning the &fficial +onds of &fficials,R
and were acting in both their personal and professional capacities in this matter Aas public ser/antAsB,
and were resident or had business within the )&*T( &$ )A##, #TAT' &$ &!T" DA8T&A in
this matter, and thereby come under this courts >urisdiction.
3.B All respondents are the alleged real party in interest, but are in fact, undefined and unknown entities
acting under pretence and o/ert fraud under color of law and under color of authority who ha/e
suffered no damage whatsoe/er.
=.B (our petitioner has been factually dri/en into indigence due to the continued, illegal and unlawful acts
and:or omissions by respondents in this matter. Petitioner has been unlawfully incarcerated,
kidnapped by public officials, falsely arrested without warrant, un>ustly imprisoned, and maliciously
prosecuted without due process of law, o/er his will and against his consent and has been constantly
unlawfully restrained of his liberty from that point onward, and without your petitioner ha/ing it
within his power to confront his accuserMs at lawful trial, and without being lawfully informed of the
nature and cause of the accusation against him, the /enue, the >urisdiction and the real party of
interest; was falsely and maliciously and unlawfully forced into a tribunal which was only held to find
my guilt for no crime at law, in a court without >urisdiction; without probable cause; and prior to the
alleged hearing and without e/idence presented at lawful trial.
H.B o lawful warrant did issue or was presented at any time to your petitioner by respondents in accordance
with the concise rule of law, and as mandated by their oath of office. o supporting affida/its,
rebuttals, /erifications, or subscription. no grand >ury indictment as mandated by the concise rule of
law was e/er used to bring me to trial,in o/ert contra/ention to the rule of law, and o/er my continued
ob>ections and against my consent. o 0ualifying signature of Appellant:Petitioner is upon any /alid
or lawful instrument and:or claim held by respondentMs in this matter.

III
W*'#TI&# P!'#'T'D

The following 0uestions are rele/ant to the issue as to the lawfulness of the con/iction from which
petitioner seeks relief and reparations in the instant caseD
-.B "as the orth Dakota ,egislature unlawfully ac0uiesced or assisted in the sub>ection of the so/ereignty of
the rightful citiPens of orth Dakota to the municipal power of the *nited #tates )ongress Afound in
Art. I, #ec. H, )l. -;, *.#. )onst.B directly be its legislation, or indirectly through agencies created for
that purpose, which ultimately led to the unlawful acts and:or omissions of respondents in this matter,
and the resultant fraudulent con/iction from which your petitioner hereby seeks relief@
6.B )an the respondentMs in this matter, through the )&*T( &$ )A##, by their /arious unlawful acts and:or
omissions in this matter and unclean hands, base these fraudulent acts and:or omissions based on
published Penal )ode Y 6;. Q$ailure to Pro/ideR and:or Y -==AaBA9B Q)ontempt of )ourtR using their
positions of power under color of law, and color of authority to use the courts of the )&*T( &$
)A##, as an organiPed crime syndicate in which to usurp your petitionerMs natural born, common law,
constitutional and:or ci/il rights@
<.B )an the respondentMs in this matter, through the )&*T( &$ )A##, by their /arious unlawful acts and:or
omissions in this matter and unclean hands, o/ercome the obligation of contract@
9.B )an the respondentMs in this matter, through the )&*T( &$ )A##, by their /arious unlawful acts
and:or omissions in this matter and unclean hands, o/ercome the obligation of contract between )hild
and $ather or affiant and state force affiant to defend life, liberty and property and secured rights and
liberty thatD QAll men are by nature free and independent and ha/e certain inalienable rights, among
which are those of 'K&(I4 and defending life and liberty; ac0uiring, possessing, and protecting
property; and pursing and obtaining safety, happiness and Kustice@
3.B )an the respondentMs in this matter, use an unconscionable contract, /itiated by fraud by way of
inducement, coersion and in fraud; null and /oid in ab initio, as a foundational basis to use published
Penal )odes under color of law, under color of authority as a basis to usurp your petitionerMs natural
born, "uman, common law, constitutional and:or ci/il rights@
-3
=.B )an the respondentMs in this matter, use the socialist doctrine Aand:or $eminist DoctrineB QIn the +est
Interests of the )hildR as a supporting basis in which to usurp and contro/ert the concise rule of law,
to the detriment of your petitioner; as enumerated by the )onstitution for the state of &!T"
DA8&TA, and:or the )onstitution for the united #tates@

H.B "as the #TAT' &$ &!T" DA8&TA and:or respondents in this matter /iolated the concise rule of law
and this petitionerMs natural born, common law, human, constitutional, and:or ci/il rights by
derogating the concise rule of law to obtain $ederal 5elfare remuneration scams and:or schemes@
T.B )an the #TAT' &$ &!T" DA8&TA and:or respondentMs in this matter prosecute a matter in the courts of
&!T" DA8&TA without lawful >urisdiction@
-..B "as your petitionerMs foundational constitutional right to ha/e a lawful +ill of Particulars answered as a
matter of substanti/e due process of law in order to inform me of the nature and cause of the
accusation been derogated by respondentMs in this matter by their insolent acts and:or omissions
clothed under color of authority, under color of law in direct /iolation of the concise rule of law@
--.B "as respondentMs the lawful authority to establish a )laim of Action based upon their own unlawful acts
and:or omissions in o/ert arrogance to the rule of law as mandated by their oaths of office and the
concise rule of law as mandated by the )onstitution of the *nited #tates A-;H;L-;T-B, and the
)onstitution for the state of orth Dakota, and the )onstitution of America@

-<.B "as the respondentMs in this matter the right to manufacture crime against your petitioner in direct
/iolation to their oath of office, and in o/ert and conspired /iolation to the concise rule of law as
defined and mandated by the )onstitution of the *nited #tates A-;H;L-;T-B, and the )onstitution for
the state of orth Dakota,
"as the respondentMs in this matter the right to unlawfully arrest this petitioner in direct /iolation
to their oath of office, and in o/ert and conspired /iolation to the concise rule of law as defined and
mandated by the )onstitution of the *nited #tates A-;H;L-;T-B, and the )onstitution for the state of
&!T" DA8&TA,@
-3.B "as the respondentMs in this matter the right to maliciously prosecute your petitioner in direct /iolation
to their oath of office, and in o/ert and conspired /iolation to the concise rule of law as defined and
mandated by the )onstitution of the *nited #tates A-;H;L-;T-B, and the )onstitution for the state of
&!T" DA8&TA@
-=.B "as the respondentMs in this matter the right to falsely imprison your petitioner in direct /iolation to
their oath of office, and in o/ert and conspired /iolation to the concise rule of law as defined and
mandated by the )onstitution of the *nited #tates A-;H;L-;T-B, and
-;.B "as the respondentMs the enumerated authority to prosecute an action without grand >ury indictment
against your petitioner in direct insolence and arrogance to the respondentMs oath of office, and in
direct /iolation to the concise rule of law as enumerated and mandated by the )onstitution of the
*nited #tates A-;H;L-;T-B,
-H.B "a/e the respondentMs the enumerated authority under the concise rule of law as mandated by the
)onstitution of the *nited #tates A-;H;L-;T-B to arrest your petitioner without a lawful warrant@
5ithout probable cause@ ot supported by affida/its@ 5ith no 4o/ernorMs 5arrant@ In direct
contra/ention to their oathMs of office and the aforementioned concise rule of law@@
6..B "as the so/ereignty of the petitioner been encroached upon, abrogated, or derogated in fa/or of legislati/e
powers eCercised in eCcess of the lawful enumerated limits of the )onstitution of the *nited #tates
A-;H;L-;T-B, and the )onstitution for the state of &!T" DA8&TA under force of arms using
cohesion,force and do it all in fraud@
1otion to dis0ualify arresting officer The &fficer had no reason to fear Affiant
who At the time of arrest, ga/e police no reason to fear for their safety. A search of was made
subse0uent to arrest where no weapons were found; hands were cuffed with no effort to resist; neither
did Affiant offer any /erbal threat of physical abuse, resistance or retaliation. 5hen directed to the
police car, Affiant complied without physical resistance. This has cost Affiant great damages,
including >ob and ability to work to support Affiant. who will be forced to pursue >ustice If this issue
can not be settled !I4"T &5, Today.
-=
Their were & IT'!%'I4 )I!)*1#TA)'# T& )A*#' A( * ')'##ITA!(
D',A( +!I4I4 1' +'$&!' A K*D4'.
There was no flood, storm, riot, or any other inter/ening circumstance to necessitate the officerSs
immediate attention, which would >ustify a delay in bringing Affiant before a magistrate. Time is more
/aluable than my money and to steal it for cage profits then >ust waste it hurt me deeply. Affiant did
not obser/e the officer, through the use of police radio , cell phone, or computer make any attempt to
locate a magistrate for the purpose of securing >urisdiction to continue to hold Affiant. In endea/oring
to take the arrested person before the magistrate, the officer must eCpend all the effort that a highly
cautious person would employ in the same circumstances.N$H3O !obinson /. ,o/ell, 6<H #.5.6d 6T9
ATeC. )i/. App. 4al/eston-T3-B, writ refused n.r.e.
D*T( T& TA8' +'$&!' 1A4I#T!AT' 5IT"&*T &*T ')'##A!( D',A(
Articles of )ode of )riminal Procedure directs the arresting officer to take the
person arrested, with or without a warrant to the nearest magistrate.
Art. -9..=. 1ust take offender before magistrate ?'Ccept as pro/ided by #ubsection AbB, in each case
enumerated in this )ode, the person making the arrest or the person ha/ing custody of the person
arrested shall take the person arrested or ha/e him taken without unnecessary delay, but not later than
9H hours after the person is arrested, before the magistrate who may ha/e ordered the arrest, before
some magistrate of the county where the arrest was made without an order, or, if necessary to pro/ide
more eCpeditiously to the person arrested the warnings described by Article -3. -; of this )ode, before
a magistrate in a county bordering the county in which the arrest was made. The magistrate shall
immediately perform the duties described in Article -3.-; of this )ode.?
5ithout considering the lawfulness of the warrant less, /ictim less arrest, for the purpose of
>urisdiction, this particular argument will only consider the actions subse0uent to arrest. The
immediate issue addresses the duty of the arresting officer to take the accused before a magistrate to
secure >urisdiction such that the #tate may rightfully continue to restrict Affiant of his life and liberty.
N6HO 1aCimum protection of indi/idual rights could be assured by re0uiring a magistrateSs re/iew of
the factual >ustification prior to any arrest, but such a re0uirement would constitute an intolerable
handicap for law enforcement. Thus, while the )ourt has eCpressed a preference for the use of arrest
warrants when feasible, +eck /. &hio, at T=; 5ong #un /. *nited #tates, <;- *.#. 9;-, 9;TL9H6
A-T=<B, it has ne/er in/alidated an arrest supported by probable cause solely because the officers failed
to secure a warrant. #ee 8er /. )alifornia, <;9 *.#. 6< A-T=<B; Draper /. *nited #tates, <3H *.#. <.;
A-T3TB; Trupiano /. *nited #tates, <<9 *.#. =TT, ;.3 A-T9HB.
N6TO *nder this practical compromise, a policemanSs onLtheLscene must make an assessment of
probable cause 7 pro/ide legal >ustification for arresting a person suspected of crime, with untainted
e/idence and for a brief period of detention to take the administrati/e steps incident to arrest. &nce the
suspect is in custody, howe/er, the reasons that >ustify dispensing with the magistrateSs neutral
>udgment e/aporate. There no longer is any danger that the suspect will escape or commit further
crimes while the police submit their e/idence to a magistrate. And, while the #tateSs reasons for taking
summary action subside, the suspectSs need for a neutral determination of probable cause increases
significantly.
The conse0uences of prolonged detention may be more serious than the interference occasioned by
arrest.
Pretrial confinement did imperil the suspectSs >ob, interrupt his source of income, and impair his
family relationships. #ee !. 4oldfarb, !ansom <6LT- A-T=3B; ,. 8atP,
Kustice Is the )rime 3-L=6 A-T;6. '/en pretrial release may be accompanied by burdensome
conditions that effect a significant restraint of liberty.
#ee, e. g., -H *. #. ). <-9= AaBA6, A3B.
5hen the stakes are this high, the detached >udgment of a neutral magistrate is essential if the $ourth
Amendment is to furnish meaningful protection from unfounded interference with liberty.
Accordingly, we hold that the $ourth Amendment re0uires a >udicial determination of probable cause
as a prere0uisite to eCtended restraint of liberty following arrest. 4'!#T'IA /. P*4" 'T A,, T3 #.
)t. H39, 96. *.#. -.<, 9< ,. 'd. 6d 39, -T;3.#)T,9.=.6 T"' P&IT I# T"' P&IT.
The arresting officer failed to take Affiant directly to the nearest magistrate.
-;
5hile certain delays can be eCpected in certain circumstances, simple failure to seek the
authority en/isioned by 4erstien / Pugh abo/e, may not be construed as a proCimate cause of
reasonable delay. The seminal case on this Affiant under #tate ,aw. see "eath / +oyd, -9- TeC. 3=T;
-;3 #.5.6d 6-9; -T9< TeC. ,'JI# <;..
?1oreo/er, if "eathSs arrest had been authoriPed by the statutes, his subse0uent
detention as pleaded pro/ed would make a case of false imprisonment against +oyd. The undisputed
facts are that after his arrest "eath rode with the sheriff to the formerSs car, which he then entered and
dro/e se/eral miles to the courthouse, followed by +oyd. There he was detained in +oydSs office from
one to three hours, while +oyd was seeking ad/ice by telephone as to what to do, in the face of a plain
statutory command as to what must be done in all cases of arrest without warrant. Art. 6-;, ).).P.,
-T63, pro/ides, ?In each case enumerated in this chapter, the person making the arrest shall
immediately take the person arrested Z Z before the nearest magistrate where the arrest was made
without an order.? #ubstantially the same re0uirement appears in Art. <63, ).).P., -T63, and Art. 9H;,
P.)., -T63. Presumably, there was a magistrate in 1ertPon, the county seat. (et +oyd offers no reason
why he did not take "eath before that official. either in his pleadings nor in his testimony does he
suggest that a magistrate was not reasonably a/ailable, although the arrest and detention all occurred
between H oSclock in the morning and noon thus Dis0ualify Arresting &fficer . If he had taken "eath to
that official, he could ha/e gotten the information and assistance he was seeking by telephone. "e was
under no obligation to seek ad/ice or aid from Kohnson. "e was under a positi/e duty immediately to
seek a magistrate. That such failure, uneCcused, makes a case of false imprisonment, as a matter of
law, is held by all the authorities. ewby /. 4unn et al, ;9 TeCas, 933, -6 #.5. =;; 1c+eath /.
)ampbell, -6 #.5. A6dB --H; Alamo Downs, Inc., et NZZZ-9O al /. +riggs A)i/. App.B, -.= #.5. A6dB
;<< Aer. dism.B; +oC /. $luitt A)i/. App.B, 9; #.5. A6dB --.;; 1addoC /. "udgeons A)i/. App.B, ;6
#.5. 9-9 Aer. ref.B; NZZ6-HO 8arner et al /. #tump A)i/. App.B, <9 #.5. =3=; Petty /. 1organ et al A)i/.
App.B, --= #.5. -9-; +ishop /. ,ucy et al A)i/. App.B 3. #.5. -.6T; <3 ).K.#., p. 39=, sec. <-.? "eath
/ +oyd, -9- TeC. 3=T; -;3 #.5.6d 6-9; -T9< TeC. ,'JI# <;.
The arresting officer in this case made no due diligent effort to locate a magistrate. To help free the
captured person. ?Although the failure to take the plaintiff before a magistrate would ha/e been
eCcused if good grounds had eCisted for the belief that a magistrate was not a/ailable, such was not
the case since the officers made no attempt to determine whether the magistrate was or would make
himself a/ailable. ? !oberts / +ohac, 3;9 $6d -6<6
Irrespecti/e of any other states, TeCas has specific legislation concerning this
re0uirement to take the accused before a magistrate and real law is uniform and applies to all e/ery
where. ot only must the arresting officer eChaust the a/ailable magistrates in the county, the
consideration of the a/ailability of a magistrate must be eCtended to include e/ery surrounding county
A Article -9..= supraB.
The record offers, as the go/ernmentSs only >ustification, e/idence that the magistrate, who issued the
warrants, ad/ised of his una/ailability after the early e/ening of $riday, #eptember H, -THT. There are
three other magistrates in the District. The record is bereft of any e/idence as to their a/ailability.
,ikewise, the record is bereft of any e/idence as to the a/ailability of any of the district Kudges. n3
Absent e/idence of other than the
una/ailability of the duty magistrate Athe propriety of which is not here 0uestionedB, there is no basis
to find that the delay for the entire period from the arrest to presentment was necessary. To be sure, it
was a weekend. The court was closed.
+ut those facts do not entitle the go/ernment to presume the absence of an obligation to try to arrange
the appearance of the arrested before one of the other possible >udicial officers.The law remains a
force in life e/en outside usual business hours and all >udicial officers ha/e the obligation to respond
to the needs of parties as they are mandated by the law. Affiant to their reasonable nonL>udicial
acti/ities, all >udicial officers stand ready to fulfill that obligation. "ere, the go/ernment has not
shown the una/ailability of all the possible >udicial officers. The obligation of complying with the law
lies with the go/ernment, which thus has the burden of pro/ing that an arrestee was brought before a
>udicial officer without unnecessary delay. Its proof of the una/ailability of one >udicial officer does
not pro/e that the delay to the neCt regular business hours, some siCty to siCtyL fi/e hours later, did not
-H
constitute unnecessary delay if it does not eChaust the possibility of an appearance before one of the
other >udicial officers in the district. #ee *nited #tates /. )olon, H<3 NZ6-O $.6d 6;, <.L<- A6d )ir.
-TH;B. *AIT'D #TAT'# /. 1&!4AA, et al. -TT. *.#. Dist. ,'JI# =6.=
The arresting officer, acting in accordance with established police policy, took
Affiant directly to >ail ha/ing made no effort to locate a magistrate for the purposes stipulated by
Article -9..= and the federal re0uirement articulated by 4erstien / Pugh supra. "a/ing so acted, the
arresting officer became a criminal actor ab initio and therefore is dis0ualified as a credible witness in
the instant matter.
A!!'#TI4 &$$I)'! A# T!'##PA##&! A4!'##&!
It is the specific allegation that the moment the arresting started the engine on the patrol car, put it in
gear and headed toward the >ail instead of toward the nearest magistrate, the crime was complete.
$rom that point onward, all the time Affiant was held in custody was in /iolation of law and an act of
8idnapping.
Y 6...<. 8IDAPPI4. TeCas Penal )ode
A person commits an offense if he intentionally or knowingly abducts another person.
A-B 5hen their is no /ictims of this action
A6B 5hen the site was contaminated by others before the officers in/ol/ed arri/ed
A<B 5hen due process is willfully ignored and it makes me a /ictim in a )onspiracy to depri/e my
rights is an affirmati/e defense to prosecution under this section thatD the abduction was not coupled
with intent to use or to threaten to use deadly force; the actor was a relati/e of the person abducted;
and the actorSs sole intent was to assume lawful control of the /ictim. An offense under this section is
a felony of the third degree.
It is the further contention of /ictim that, as the alleged act of kidnapping was
committed in furtherance of an ongoing criminal conspiracy to eCtort funds from Affiant in the form
of fines and fees collected in /iolation of the due course of the laws of the #tate and I feel conspiracy
is across this country.
The alleged schemes included felony acts to the detriment of Affiant , including assault and battery,
the act of kidnapping is more specifically defined as
6...9. A44!A%AT'D 8IDAPPI 4.
A person commits an offense if he intentionally or knowingly abducts another person with the intent
toD
A-B hold him for ransom or reward;
A6B A6B use him as a shield or hostage;
A<B facilitate the commission of a felony while armed
A9B the flight after the attempt or commission of a felony;
A3B inflict bodily in>ury on him or /iolate or abuse him seCually;
A=B terroriPe him or a third person; or to officially oppress this /ictim.
A;B interfere with the performance of any go/ernmental or political function.
A person commits an offense if the person intentionally or knowingly abducts another person and uses
or eChibits a deadly weapon during the commission of the offence. 'Ccept as pro/ided by #ubsection
AdB, an offense under this section is a felony of the first degree. At the punishment stage of a trial, the
Affiant may raise the issue as to whether he /oluntarily released the /ictim in a safe place. If the
Affiant pro/es the issue in the affirmati/e by a preponderance of the e/idence, the offence is a felony
of the second degree is established.
All who participated with the arresting office in the confinement of Affiant are likewise trespassers on
the law and /iolators of )onstitutional pro/isions, and therefore, cannot claim to be acting for the
public good or under any >urisdiction as no >urisdiction allows for criminal acts to be committed under
color of any official authority.
*nder the doctrine of trespass ab initio, where a party eCceeds an authority gi/en by law, They ha/e
stepped out of their oath of office protectors and become transgressors of law.. 5hen they claim to
know the law, the party loses the benefit of the >ustification and is considered a trespasser ab initio,
although to a certain eCtent the party followed the authority gi/en. The law will then operate
-T
retrospecti/ely to defeat all acts done under the color of lawful authority. American 1ortg. )orp. /.
5yman 9- #.5.6d 6;.
Thus, a person who enters on real property lawfully pursuant to a conditional or restricted consent
and remains after his or her right to possession terminates and demand is made for his or her remo/al
becomes a trespasser from the beginning, and the law will then operate retrospecti/ely to defeat all
acts done by him under color of lawful authority. 5illiams /. 4arnett, =.H #.5.6d ;T9 ATeC. )i/. App.
5aco -TH.B.
The rule applies to the acts of sheriffs and other officers, as well as to the conduct of pri/ate
indi/iduals. American 1ortg. )orp. /. 5yman
The court will find a /erified criminal affida/it If this is pursued alleging the act of Agra/ated
8idnapping and terrorisim by the arresting officer. 5hile the act is more commonly referred to as
?false imprisonment? there is no such statute, the proper citation is kidnapping.
$urther, my bill will continue until this matter is fully settled and names cleared as the act was
aggra/ated by the fact that the arresting officer was displaying a deadly weapon at the time
eliminating any possibility of resistance by Affiant of the criminal act and the act was committed in
order to facilitate the subse0uent commission of the felony act of Tampering 5ith a 4o/ernment
Document, Articles of Penal )ode by the >ailer and magistrate A I will supply full eCplanation if
needed for a fee of F-3.B.
P!&#')*T&!IA, P*!P&#' $&! D'(I4 TI1',( 'JA1II4 T!AI,#
#ub>ecting Affiant to unnecessary and humiliating procedures when a probable cause
hearing could render them unnecessary ser/es the prosecutorSs interest. +y facilitating coerci/e
practices during booking, the >ail psychologically softens up the accused for ?the
deal? by lea/ing them emotionally, mentally and physically eChausted, coerced, and intimidated. The
necessity of this will become apparent when we get to the prosecutorial practice of secreting the
records from the clerk of the court below.
A clean hands policy renders any American court without >urisdiction
It must be construed the facts of the cause, Affiant was sub>ected to imprisonment
after arrest as a matter of policy and not necessity. Therefore, the act wherein Affiant was abducted at
constructi/e gunpoint by the arresting officer and taken straight to >ail instead of some magistrate is an
act of Aggra/ated 8idnapping as defined by P) Article 6...9 .
In as much as the rights of Affiant were /iolated as a matter of policy, Affiant asserts, the arresting
agency, by not seeking the proper authority became a trespasser ab inito as with all others who
participated in the confinement of Affiant, and the court is thereby left without >urisdiction or cause of
action in the instant cause, a clear conspiracy.
5here se/eral people acted together in pursuit of unlawful acts, each one is in this conspiracy and will
be held liable for collateral damages and crimes, e/en though unplanned and unintended, if those
crimes are foreseeable, ordinary and probable conse0uences of preparation or eCecution of the
unlawful act. )urtis /. #tate A)r.App. -T;HB 3;< #.5.6d 6-T. )riminal ,aw 3TA9B
Dri/ing is not )areer unless done commercially, It effects me in the most profound of ways, It stops
me from seeking employment, the right to happiness or to e/en eCist.
&n showing that all persons arrested by the agency are taken directly to >ail and no due
diligent effort is made by the arresting officer to locate a magistrate, it must be construed the practices
are participated in by more than one person. It must further be construed those in/ol/ed had to interact
with one another in an effort to standardiPe and coLordinate the procedures practiced. It must thereby
be construed all participants conspired with one another toward the furtherance of the abo/e indicated
conspiratorial relationship.
TeCas Penal )ode Y -3..6. )!I1I A, )&#PI!A)(.
A person commits criminal conspiracy if, with intent that a felony be committedD
A-B he agrees with one or more persons that they or one or more of them engage in conduct that would
constitute the offense; and A6B he or one or more of them performs an o/ert act in pursuance of the
agreement. A<B An agreement constituting a conspiracy may be inferred from acts of the parties.
A9B It is no defense to prosecution for criminal conspiracy thatD A3B one or more of the co conspirators
is not criminally responsible for the ob>ect &ffense;
6.
A=B one or more of the co conspirators has been ac0uitted, so long as two or more
co conspirators ha/e not been ac0uitted;
A;B one or more of the co conspirators has not been prosecuted or con/icted, has
been con/icted of a different offense, or is immune from prosecution;
AHB the actor belongs to a class of persons that by definition of the ob>ect offense
is legally incapable of committing the ob>ect offense in an indi/idual capacity;
ATB the ob>ect offense was actually committed.
An offense under this section is one category lower than the most serious felony that is the ob>ect of
the conspiracy, and if the most serious felony that is the ob>ect of the conspiracy is a state >ail felony,
the offense is a )lass A misdemeanors.
In the e/ent Affiant has been sub>ected to a depri/ation of rights, and tort damages subse0uent to a
criminal conspiracy by those officials responsible for the arrest and subse0uent depri/ation of liberty
of Affiant , all are dis0ualified, declared not credible persons, and rendered without >urisdiction to act
in the instant cause.
Defendant mo/es the court to declare arresting officer not a credible witness conse0uent to the
criminal acts perpetrated against Defendant subse0uent to arrest.
Defendant further mo/es the court to strike the criminal accusation and statement of
probable cause presented by &fficer as unreliable.
Defendant further mo/es the court to dismiss the instant allegation with pre>udice.
T"' 1&TI&# T& DI#1I##
1y client, ha/ing been forced under threat, duress, and coercion, only to protect Aggrie/ed
DefendantSs interests, without any appearance of an ad/erse party, where the Kudge was not an
impartial party, but also prosecution, which is a conflict of interests and gi/es rise to /iolation of due
process rights of the alleged defendant, who is now aggrie/ed because of such impartiality, and as
such this court has lost immunity and any preconcei/ed >urisdiction.
$urther in/estigation shows that there was no probable cause for the arrest and seiPure at the time of
such arrest and seiPure. There was no disturbance of the peace, felony, or warrant for such action,
leading to another cause of action against the Plaintiff and &fficer for harassment and obtaining a
signature under threat, duress and coercion.
In the interest of >ustice and to preclude further in>ury to the )itiPens and Aggrie/ed DefendantD
1&TI& [ -
Aggrie/ed Defendant hereby motions the court to dismiss for failure to establish probable cause
within 9H hours, or to issue a ?otice of Infraction?, Aofficer issued a ?&TI)' T& APP'A!?B,
therefore the court has no >urisdiction in the matter.
1&TI& [ 6
Aggrie/ed Defendant hereby motions the court to dismiss for failure to establish probable cause for
the traffic stop, and a contested hearing within ninety days under the )onstitution of the *ntied #tates
therefore any >urisdiction is lost in the matter.
1&TI& [ <
Aggrie/ed Defendant hereby motions the court to dismiss for lack of prosecution at hearing.
Prosecution failed to in/oke >urisdiction, wherefore this court has lost any alleged >urisdiction and has
denied an ad/ersarial proceeding amounting to lack of due process.
1&TI& [ 9
Aggrie/ed Defendant hereby motions the court to suppress all e/idence unlawfully
obtained by the traffic stop ?arrest? by the arresting officer who comes with unclean
hands.
The )onstitution of the *nited #tates forbids that a standing army may be
maintained in peace time. #uch constitutional abuse of 5A! P&5'!#, if not rebutted
by some superior law, will be e/idence of such wilful intent to in>ure the rights of peaceful )itiPens.
1&TI& [ 3
1y client comes into this court under the American $lag of Peace, and municipality has no eCpress
authority to use marital war powers upon this )itiPen without lawful declaration. This )itiPen also
6-
declares that the /enue is improper, in that the alleged infraction did not occur upon any municipal
property and as such must be dismissed.
1&TI& [ =
Aggrie/ed Defendant hereby motions the court to dismiss the charge for failure to eCplain the nature
and cause of the accusation, thereby lea/ing the Defendant in ignorance and without aid of knowledge
to prepare a knowledgeable defence, and
amounts to denial of due process without answering my bill of particulars submitted or co/ering these
0uestions, basic 0uestions asked of this court.
-. I# 1( ),I'T, Am I entitled to a fair hearing@
6. 5ho has the burden of proof or burden of pro/iding a preponderance of e/idence@
<. Am I presumed innocent of e/ery element of this alleged crime or alleged action at
hand@
9. Am I supposed to be informed of the nature and cause of the charges and proceedings against me@
3. Is there e/idence of a complaining party@
=. Did I /iolate someoneSs legal rights@
;. If yes, then please specify which rights I /iolated.
Is this a )i/il or criminal matter and will I see a /ictim or contract I signed@
1&TI& T& DI#1I## IDI)T1'T & T"' 4!&*D# T"AT IT" AD T'T"
A1'D1'T# T& T"' *IT'D #TAT'# )&#TIT*TI& P!&"I+IT P*I#"1'T &$
)!I1'# 5IT"&*T %I)TI1#.
A# A %I&,ATI& &$ T"' !I4"T# !'TAI'D +( 5' T"' P'&P,',
T& +' $!'' $!&1 )!I1IA, P!&#')*TI& $&! P&##'##I4 A #*+#TA)' "A%I4
!',ATI%',( "A!1,'## '$$')T# & T"' *#'!, &T"'! P'!#&# &! #&)I'T( +*T A
P&,ITI)A, T&&, &$ P!&$IT.
)&1'# &5 the accused, 4reatly aggrie/ed by counsel, This court and this prosecution Ss theft of
my time and resources and mo/es this DI# "onourable )ourt to dismiss the indictment against me on
the grounds that their is no /ictim to eCamine, confront or defend myself from. the inth Amendment
re0uires this )ourt to declare 6- *.#.). YH9-AaBA-B, as it applies to mari>uana, paraphernalia, &!
&T"'! #*+#TA)' unconstitutional on its face, and as applied, constitutes a denial and
disparagement of rights retained by the people which the go/ernment has no authority under the Tenth
Amendment to Infringe. The right to face and cross eCamine his /ictim Is rendering me a sla/e of the
state. I state the following grounds for this motion.
I f charged with drug paraphernalia and mari>uana in a threeLcount indictment.
)ount - alleges that the accused to possess drug paraphernalia The historical foundation and
legislati/e history of the inth and Tenth Amendments, as well as rules of statutory
interpretation, support the proposition that they were included in the )onstitution to afford substanti/e
protection for *n enumerated rights which are retained by the people
Kudicial application of the inth Amendment since its enactment pro/ides precedent for a substanti/e
interpretation. #ee, e.g., 4riswold /. )onnecticut,
The standard to be applied in determining whether the acti/ity or beha/ior constituting /ictim less
crimes are protected by the inth and Tenth Amendments should be whether the act or beha/ior to be
regulated causes harm to persons other than the indi/idual engaging in this alleged crime..
#ince the latest scientific e/idence establishes that mari>uana is a relati/ely harmless drug ha/ing no
detrimental effects on the indi/idual users or society, +*T what is created by itSs regulations, gangs,
burglaries, and /iolence in/ol/ed in protecting profits this illicit substance brings in. &r unlike
prescription drugs, cigarettes, whiskey or a knife. Items that are killing thousands of people with cold
blooded efficiency to keep crime profitable. yet the right to possess A harmless substance, regardless
of oneSs intent, is a direct attack on the rights retained by the people under the inth and Tenth
Amendments.
I 1AITAI A "*1A !I4"T# %I&,ATI& I# +'I4 )&11ITT'D & 1( P'!#& A#
T"I# )"A!4' P,A)'# ,A5 &%'! 1', T"' IDI%ID*A, AD I# &T *#'D $&! 1(
P'!#&A, &! T"' P*+,I) P!&T')TI& +*T $&! P!&$IT AD )&T!&,.
66
T"I# I# A +,ATAT !.'.).&. !A)8'T''!I4, A P(!A1ID #)"'1' T& D'P!I%' 1(
),I'T &$ 1( !I4"T#, 1( 1&'( AD &*! TI1'.
These actions are )ausing client irreparable mental, emotional and physical damage and I feel you are
considering us as less than human and are seeking to destroy in whole or part, 1y class of people you
deem un desirable and according to the * international treaty, 4enocide. This is the seeds of
4enocide. A gra/e warning sign that I feel has destroyed countless li/es in this enforcement of and
persecution of actions designed to manufacture /ictims, crime and debt. The legal system is the only
ones who profit from this and we are forced to pay people who deny us e0ual protection and due
process.
&TI)' AD )&1P,AIT +!'A)" &$ &AT"
?The people are the 1asters of both )ongress and )ourts, &T to o/erthrow the )onstitution, but to
o/erthrow the men who per/ert it? Abraham ,incoln
I##*'D T&D T"' #TAT' &$ &!T" DA8&TA
Public #er/ants
$!&1D'D )*!TI# %eteran ne/er relie/ed of this duty
An American )i/ilian, A /ictim,#tate )itiPen and )itiPen of the American !epublic
I do solemnly swear Aor affirmB that I will support and defend the )onstitution of the *nited #tates
against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental
reser/ation or purpose of e/asion, and that I will well and truthfully discharge the duties of the office
on which I am about to enter. #o help me 4od.
8&5 $&! T"' !')&!D, This document '$$')TI%' upon receipt, ser/es notice of malfeasance
to any public, eCecuti/e, legislati/e or >udicial representati/e of 5e the People concerning a primary
re0uirement of public office, +reach ofD their #worn &ath to #upport and Defend &ur )onstitutionNsO
of the *nited #tates &! any American of 5e the People; +reaching their %oluntary )ontractNsO and
1andatory DutyNiesO of #upport and Defend. The act of promoting, enforcing, legislating, or >udging
anything contrary to the )onstitution of the *nited #tates ?The #upreme ,aw of the ,and? AD:&!
any #tate )onstitution in our )&1P&*D !'P*+,I) \#tate 7 $ederal )onstitutions, ?$ederalist
3-?] is an Act of Insurrection /iolating a re0uirement of public office, immediately suspending all
authority granted by the people, punishable by impeachment, recall or remo/al and charges.
Additionally, notification to a >udge identifies a +reach of 4ood +eha/ior. This document !e0uires
4rand Kury !e/iew of the 4o/ernment or any other entity thereof. $ederalist Papers H< Paragraph -=
)l. 6. In orth Dakota, Their is no 4rand >ury in /iolation to our $ederal )onstitution.
5ebsterSs 'nc. *nabr. Dictionary ^ -THT definesD
I. Insurrection ?any? act or instance of...open resistance to established authority.
II. 4ood beha/ior -. )onduct conformable to A,, law and >ustice.
6. Proper fulfillment of the duties of office, especially, a public office.
All law contrary to &ur )onstitutionNsO the established authorityNiesO ha/e no merit and are &T
enforceable. 5e the peopleSs unalienable rights are beyond the encroachment of mortal man and
cannot be /iolated by mere acts of go/ernment.
I. If you, as a public ser/ant ha/e done anything to cause issuance of this notification and complaint,
then realiPe the good faith under which it was issued, the #upreme ,aw of the ,and, &ur *. #.
)onstitution. Article II, #ection 9. !emo/al from &ffice.
II. If without proof of commission, you pose to act in any official public, eCecuti/e, or >udicial
capacity and ha/e &T taken an oath to support &ur )onstitution in /iolation Article %I cl.<, or mo/e
in +!'A)" of same, then anyone so charged could be creating a public nuisance. A ,ist identified
+reaches of &ath, )onstitutional Transgressions or 4eneral 1alfeasance & !')&!D. T!'A#&,
)!I1'# A4AI#T "*1AIT(, A)T# &$ 4'&)ID', 'JT&!T*', &$$I)IA,
&PP!'##I&,1A##I%' "*1A !I4"T# %I&,ATI&# , )&#PI!A)(, 8IDAPPI4,
P'!$ID( $!A*D *P& T"' )&*!T AD #'DITI&. Are war crimes, $or the good of all, must
be aggressi/ely pursued. 'D )*!TI# and client
!espectfully #ubmitted, ?5ith ,iberty and Kustice for All?,
5ithout Pre>udice *)) -L6.;; -L-.<
)&#T!*)TI%' &TI)'D As we belie/e that )riminal Acts ha/e taken place, I ha/e reser/ed the
6<
$undamental !ight to +e "eard, as $ree #peech in a )ourt of !ecord to an impartial >ury of my peers
a !'D!'## of 4!I'%A)'#. Title 6H *#) re0uires a record to be kept of hearings. Destroying the
record Aa felonyB or refusal to keep oath is a /iolation of law initiating an automatic re/ersal or
mistrial. Prohibiting the defendant from testifying or challenging his accusers is Destroying the record
by prohibiti/e con/ersion. #uppression of Truth is $!A*D, therefore the )riminal &bstruction of
Kustice, attempting to &btain a $alse %erdict by biasing the impartial >ury, denying a $*,, $AI!
"'A!I4 is a DI#"&&*!A+,' D'$A*,T 7 Kury tampering.
Therefore, attempting to ad>udge, legislate, enforce &! #'T any ?)rime?, alleged &!D'!# without
"&'#T( presented by both sides to an impartial >ury are 'JP!'##,( P!&"I+IT'D, by but not
limited to, the ?+ills of Attainder )lause? Nas Titles of obility, +ills of Pains and Penalties, ?$ines?,
+ills of )redit, in /iolation of the &ath of &ffice, +reaching 4ood +eha/ior, as 'Ctortion, +lackmail
and +ribery, )riminal Acts /oliti/e of !.I.).&, the "obbs Act; Title -H Y 69-, 69- )olorable ,aw;
!eid /. )o/ert <39 *# -; *.#. /. Throckmorton TH *.#. =- pg. =3 and $ederalist Papers H< Paragraph
-= )l. 6 $ederalist Papers H< "amilton Paragraph -= )l. 6 5illful abuses of a public authority, to the
oppression of the sub>ect, and e/ery species of official 'Ctortion, are offenses against the go/ernment,
for which the persons who commit them may be indicted and punished according to the circumstances
of the case. T"'#' A!' )APTI&, &$$')'#.
$ederalist Papers H< "amilton Paragraph -; )l. 6 The #trongest argument in its fa/or NTrial by KuryO
is that it is security against corruption.
$ederalist Papers ;H "amilton Paragraph ; )l. 9. The Kudiciary, on the contrary, has no influence o/er
the sword or no direction either of the strength or wealth of society and can take o acti/e resolution
whate/er. *.#. /. Throckmorton TH *.#. =- pg. =3 $raud /itiates the consent of the most solemn
contracts, documents and e/en >udgments.
1&TI& [ ;
The Aggrie/ed Defendant further motions the court to dismiss for statutory authoriPation of officer to
issue a ?&TI)' T& APP'A!?, or pro/ide such statute that authoriPes such form to be issued by a
member of the eCecuti/e branch. Aggrie/ed Defendant ob>ects to the martial law war powers
summary >udgment of this court and lack of due process and I reser/e all my rights under the common
law including the right to appeal, without cost and do not /oluntarily wai/e any rights to bill for my
time and seek damages for )onstitutional, human or ci/il rights /iolations in the amount of F-.,....
per /iolation suffered. 1otion to dis0ualify officials and dismiss all allegations
ow comes Affiant hereinafter referred to as Defendant and mo/es the court to dis0ualify the arresting
officer, court clerk, prosecuting attorney, and presiding >udge for cause shown.
Defendant mo/es the court to dismiss A,, allegations made by the instant cause as said allegations
and subse0uent prosecution constitutes an onLgoing criminal conspiracy against Defendant et al
intended to eCtort monies from Defendant in /iolation of the due course of the laws of the #tate. #aid
conspiracy includes acts on the part of the presiding >udge committed in concert and collusion with the
prosecuting attorney intended to deny Defendant in the due course of the laws towardD coercing
Defendant into entering into a decepti/e contract, sub>ecting Defendant to unnecessary incon/enience
by forcing Defendant to submit to multiple appearances held for no legal purpose other than to harass
Defendant, demonstrated bias on the part of the courts intended to undermine the confidence of
Defendant in the possibility of a fair hearing by the abuse of process wherein Defendant is forced to
attend hearings for no legal purpose but rather, for the purpose of sub>ecting Defendant to abusi/e
treatment by prosecuting attorney, and sub>ecting Defendant to a deliberate conni/ance by the court to
present the prosecuting attorney as a >udicial officer at a hearing wherein prosecutor presides o/er a
hearing to which Defendant has been summoned by court process and is a simulation of a legal
process not proper under law but intended to lend the prestige of the court to the improper threats and
coercion of the prosecutor in order to eCtort an improper plea bargain from Defendant., held for
ransom. #tatement of facts
Defendant recei/ed a summons from &fficer, ordering Defendant to appear at the )ounty )ourt for the
stated purpose of being brought before a magistrate.
Defendant appeared and entered a plea or for the purpose of meeting with the prosecuting attorney
wherein Defendant was insulted, bullied, and coerced by prosecutor in order to deny Defendant in a
69
fair hearing before a neutral court. $rom eCperience, 1y public protector told me, QI 5I,, Take the
plea or "' will help con/ict meR. It is on the >ail phone but the phones do not work this way, for me.
Improper citation
+y the citation issued by the arresting officer, Defendant was coerced into entering a plea to the court.
As no law eCists which places a duty on any person accused of a crime to enter a plea, said order is
beyond the power of the court to demand. Any plea entered at said time may not be said to ha/e been
entered into with complete disclosure and free of coercion and bring fraud upon the court. Allegation
of coercion
It is not the contention of Defendant that the notice to appear is illegal by its nature as said agreement
is clearly authoriPed by law. It is the contention of Defendant that when said contract was offered to
the accused at the time of arrest, said offer of contract must comport with standing law and be offered
free of coercion and with full disclosure. The coercion inherent in the offer of a contract by an
arresting officer is accepted by Defendant as reasonable under the circumstances of the possibility of
physical arrest and said coercion is not the matter brought to issue by the instant motion before the
court. Defendant brings to issue the inherent misrepresentation of authority contained in the offered
contract supported by fact. The courts of TeCas ha/e consistently adhered to the common law doctrine
of duress as well as a more modern doctrine of duress of property. 1c4owen /. +ush, I ha/e pages of
reference if needed. The )onstitutional authority for the licensing and taCing of P!I%AT' automobiles
and dri/ers does &T eCist, and today is largely based on early legal wordLgames played by lawyers
in the state legislatures acting in /iolation of the constitutional mandate of the ?separation of powers.?
The ?motor /ehicle? statutes were designed and written to purposely confuse free ci/ilian tra/el on the
public roads with the taCable profession of ?dri/ing? LL the hauling of passengers or freight for profit.
The motor /ehicle statue code is a hodgepodge of selfLcontradicting,1achia/ellian, and calculatedly
incomprehensible rules and regulations. The administration of this network of nonsense re0uires huge
armies of go/ernment employees, chosen for their innate indifference to other people, and rigorously
trained to work at cross purposes with the millions of befuddled and frightened people who labor and
suffer in what is left of the pri/ate sector. It was and still is folly to put people with these loony ideas
in charge of our li/es and our destinies. And it is degrading to meekly submit to the torture they put us
through as they wrest away our fortunes and our freedoms. 'ach of the states Department of 1otor
%ehicles is closer to the aPi 4estapo than most of us ha/e the courage to admit. The use of the police
for intimidation and armed threats to e/oke stark fear in the populace is a deliberate strategy. In fact,
dri/ersS licenses are only thinly disguised police ID cards. Do you forget how to dri/e when mo/ing
across town, or into another state@ Then why isnSt the dri/er license you got in another state the year
you graduated from high school still as ?good? as the high school diploma you earned that same year@
The answer of course, is that the go/ernment through the police, must always know your current
address so that they can control you.. +y signing, (ou sign a room full of fraud laws that allows you to
be hunted for fun and profit (our food for a greedy, hungry system with one. A( )&T!A)T
1AD' I $!A*D I# %&ID A( )ontract misleading on its face, enforced by force, and not fully
agreed on is /oid, in honesty and law.
The contract is so structured as to gi/e the appearance of authority to demand a plea from Defendant
wherein there is no such authority under law. "ad such a contract been offered free of coercion, it is
dubious as to rather the contract would be /alid considering that it had the effect of enticing Defendant
to unknowingly wai/e a right to not enter a plea, howe/er, ha/ing been entered into at the constructi/e
point of a gun, *nder the threat of you can go to a cage, there can be no /alidity to the re0uirement of
a plea accepted under such circumstances. A #pecial plea wai/ed by capitulation arises.
If Defendant abides by the contract and makes appearance at the court and enters a plea, the right to
entering a special appearance is effecti/ely wai/ed. As will be alleged below, the citations commonly
prepared by arresting officers are insufficient on their face. If Defendant is tricked into entering a plea,
the plea acts to accept the authority of the court and wai/es the right to appear before a magistrate as
stipulated in the promise to appear. 5ai/er of a right may not be construed as /oluntary if said wai/er
is secured by trickery or deception by others enforcing it.
Y<-..-.TeCas Penal )ode
A-B Definitions In this chapterD
63
?Deception? meansD creating or confirming by words or conduct a false impression of law or fact that
is likely to affect the >udgment of another in the transaction, and that the actor does not belie/e to be
true;
)onspiratorial collusion on part of court officers
It is the contention of Defendant that the re0uirement of entering a plea was included in the plea offer,
in order to circum/ent laws which would re0uire some magistrate to hold a proper eCamination into
the sufficiency of the allegation made against Defendant. This practice acts to ser/e the personal
interest and con/enience of the magistrate while denying Defendant in the due course of the laws.
Improper argument against right to an eCamination hearing. At this point it is to be eCpected that the
prosecuting attorney will argue that there is no right to an eCamining trail in the case of an allegation
of a /iolation of a law defined as a misdemeanors. Defendant will stipulate to that there is no such
re0uirement, howe/er, by making such an argument in the instant cause, the prosecutor would defraud
the court. The instant assertion does not go the right of an eCamining trial on the making of an
allegation; it goes to the right of an eCamining trial at the point that the liberty of the citiPen is
restricted. It is well established that, any time a citiPen is restricted at liberty, an eCamining trial
always attaches.
Y39<...3. Promise to Appear; !elease
To secure release, the person arrested must make a written promise to appear in court by signing the
written notice prepared by the arresting officer. The signature may be obtained on a duplicate form or
on an electronic de/ice capable of creating a copy of the signed notice. The arresting officer shall
retain the paper or electronic original of the notice and deli/er the copy of the notice to the person
arrested. The officer shall then promptly release the person from custody.
Any argument that the accused was not arrested must be put to rest by the abo/e as no citation can be
issued until such time as the accused had been arrested as indicated by the abo/e statute authoriPing
the preparation of the ?promise to appear.?
Y39<...=. Time and Place of Appearance
The time specified in the notice to appear must be at least -. days after the date of arrest unless the
person arrested demands an earlier hearing .
The place specified in the notice to appear must be before a magistrate ha/ing >urisdiction of the
offense who is in the municipality or county in which the offense is alleged to ha/e been committed.
It is clear from a reading of the abo/e statute that the promise is to appear before some magistrate
?ha/ing >urisdiction for the offense.? *nder normal arrest procedures, the arresting officer would be
re0uired to bring the accused before a magistrate for some magistrate by Article -9..= )odes of
)riminal ProcedureD
Art. -9..=. 1ust Take &ffender +efore 1agistrate
'Ccept as pro/ided by #ubsection AbB, in each case enumerated in this )ode, the person making the
arrest shall take the person arrested or ha/e him taken without unnecessary delay before the magistrate
who may ha/e ordered the arrest, before some magistrate of the county where the arrest was made
without an order, or, if necessary to pro/ide more eCpeditiously to the person arrested the warnings
described by Article -3.-; of this )ode, before a magistrate in a county bordering the county in which
the arrest was made. The magistrate shall immediately perform the duties described in Article -3.-; of
this )ode.
A peace officer who is charging a person, including a child, with committing an offense that is a )lass
) misdemeanorSs, other than an offense under #ection 9T..6, Penal )ode, may, instead of taking the
person before a magistrate, issue a citation to the person that contains written notice of the time and
place the person must appear before a magistrate, the name and address of the person charged, and the
offense charged.
In the instant cause, Y39<...3. TeCas Transportation )ode allows the officer the option of fulfilling the
re0uirement by allowing the person to bring him:herself before the magistrate. 5hen the person had
brought him:herself before the magistrate, the magistrate must perform an eCamining trial as
prescribed by )hapter -= TeCas )ode of )riminal Procedure.
Art. 6.--. 'Camining )ourt
6=
5hen the magistrate sits for the purpose of in0uiring into a criminal accusation against any person,
this is called an eCamining court.
1agistrates were put in place to accord >ust this protection and prosecutor would, by making the
abo/e referenced argument, mislead the court into denying Defendant in the most basic right a proper
eCamination into the sufficiency of an allegation before being held to answer to an allegation. The
re0uirement is in place, but the magistrate would not see Defendant when Defendant made proper
appearance. Defendant was denied opportunity to enter e/idence which would show that the cause
should not proceed and was, thereby, denied in his right to be free from an improper or unnecessary
prosecution.
)lerk impersonated magistrate
5hen Defendant appeared as promised at the court, the clerk of the court, in impersonation of a
>udicial officer, con/ened a hearing and took DefendantSs plea.
Y<;.-- Impersonating Public #er/ant N6L-. years G F.L-.,...O
A person commits an offense if heD
impersonates a public ser/ant with intent to induce another to submit to his pretended official
authority or to rely on his pretended official acts; or
knowingly purports to eCercise any function of a public ser/ant or of a public office, including that of
a >udge and court, and the position or office through with he purports to eCercise a function of a public
ser/ant or public office has no lawful eCistence under the constitution or laws of this state or of the
*nited #tates.
AbB An offense under this section is a felony of the third degree.
In the instant cause, the clerk of the court impersonated the magistrate and used said implied authority
to deny Defendant in the right to a proper eCamination into the sufficiency of the allegations made
against Defendant. )itation fails to ade0uately notify defendant +y the instant cause, Defendant has
been charged with some natural language act. The citation does not stipulate some particular statute so
that Defendant my be ade0uately ad/ised of the charge against same. Arresting officers made no
effort to properly charge the accused in traffic matters as it is ne/er intended that the accused e/er
ha/e the opportunity to challenge the allegation. +y denying citiPens a proper eCamining trial, officers
are at liberty to make any allegation they please without consideration of >udicial o/ersight /iolating,
separation of powers.
This is a common practice as it is ne/er intended that Defendant ha/e the opportunity at defense as
e/ery step on from the point of the citation being issued is so contri/ed so as to eCert undue pressures
on Defendant that a plea bargain will be achie/ed with no 0uestion of the propriety of the procedures
e/er being raised.
)itation /iolates specific law
The citation and promise to appear order Defendant to appear at the court on or before the date stated
on the citation. +ecause of the /ery nature of the conditions of the promise to appear it is clear the
court has no intention of holding a proper hearing when Defendant complies with the conditions of the
promise. In the first instance, the court will not ha/e a proper charging instrument a/ailable to it that
is necessary to in/est the court with >urisdiction.
In the second instance, e/en were there a proper charging instrument before the court, it would be
necessary to enter e/idence into the court record to support the citation.
In an eCamining trial, the truth of the accusation may not be based on the accusation alone; such
conclusion, if /alid, would render the eCamining trial a useless thing, a mere reLenactment of the
earlier determination of whether an arrest warrant should issue. 'C parte 4arcia, 39; #.5.6d 6;- ATeC.
)rim. App. -T;;B. !ather, the state must show that there is a reason to belie/e that an indictment will
be preferred for some /iolation of the law. 'C parte 1artin, --T TeC. )rim. -9-, 93 #.5.6d T=3
A-T<6B. Thus, the state has the burden of pro/ing that there is probable cause to belie/e the accused
committed the offense charged against him or her. #tate eC rel. "olmes /. #alinas, ;H9 #.5.6d 96-
ATeC. )rim. App. -TT.B. As the accuser is not eCpected to be present, it must be construed the court
intended to deny Defendant in a proper hearing and allow the clerk to impersonate a >udicial officer in
order to deny Defendant in the due course of the laws of the #tate.
!ights denied toward administrati/e con/enience
6;
The right to an eCamining trial is undeniably re0uired by clear and long established federal
re0uirements. +y attempting to trick Defendant into entering a plea before the clerk as if such a
practice were in keeping with the due course of the laws, the accused is induced to wai/e the right to
an eCamining trial on arrest and the court, in an effort to ser/e the administrati/e con/enience of the
magistrate, has acted to defraud Defendant by the simulation of a legal process.
Y<6.9H #imulating ,egal Process
N.L- year G F.L9,... &! -H. daysL6 years G F.L-.,...O
A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be deli/ered to another any document
that simulates a summons, complaint, >udgment, or other court process with the intent toD induce
payment of a claim from another person; or cause another toD
submit to the putati/e authority of the document; or
take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the
document, or on the basis of the document.
Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended
recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was deli/ered.
It is not a defense to prosecution under this section that the simulating documentD
states that it is not legal process; or
purports to ha/e been issued or authoriPed by a person or entity who did not ha/e lawful authority to
issue or authoriPe the document.
If it is shown on the trial of an offense under this section that the simulating document was filed with,
presented to, or deli/ered to a clerk of a court or an employee of a clerk of a court created or
established under the constitution or laws of this state, there is a rebut table presumption that the
document was deli/ered with the intent described by #ubsection AaB.'Ccept as pro/ided by #ubsection
AfB, an offense under this section is a )lass A misdemeanors.
If it is shown on the trial of an offense under this section that the defendant has pre/iously been
con/icted of a /iolation of this section, the offense is a state >ail felony.
The citation issued by the complaining officer has the effect of arrest Asee Transportation )ode
39<...3 supraB, in that the Defendant has been restricted at liberty and thereby, at first appearance
before the court, has a right to an eCamining trial to protect the liberty interest of the Defendant. +y
the improper re0uirement of an agreement to enter a plea, and the subse0uent enticement to enter said
plea before the court clerk, the court attempts to circum/ent said protection long considered essential
to the fair and orderly administration of >ustice.
Abuse of process
After appearing before the court and after ha/ing been tricked into entering a plea, Defendant was
summoned to a hearing for the alleged purpose of identifying himself and entering a plea, howe/er,
Defendant had already appeared before the court in accordance with the agreement entered into upon
signing the citation issued by the arresting office. The court, under the guise of authority granted by
Article 6H..- TeCas )ode of )riminal Procedure, alleged to act under itSs official authority in order to
force Defendant to take a day off work and tra/el to the court so that the court to ha/e Defendant do
what Defendant had already done. If the original appearance before the court wherein Defendant
identified himself and entered a plea was not an arraignment, then the original appearance, to which
Defendant was summoned by way of the ?Promise to Appear,? was not a legal hearing. If the original
appearance was a legal hearing, an arraignment had already been held. &rdering redundant hearings
for the purpose of establishing that which had already been established can only be considered
harassment and an abuse of process by the >udge by summoning Defendant to a redundant hearing.
Deliberate harassment of defendant
It is the contention and allegation of Defendant that the second arraignment hearing was for the
purpose of harassment of Defendant ordered solely because Defendant did not enter a guilty plea. In
order to a/oid the cost and incon/enience of holding a fair trial, the court engages in harassment
tactics in order to greatly increase the burden on the accused so as to coerce a plea bargain.
Prosecutor impersonating >udge
Defendant was summoned to a subse0uent hearing wherein no hearing was held. The prosecuting
attorney held what appeared to be a hearing with no >udge present. At said hearing, the prosecuting
6H
attorney attempted to coerce a plea bargain with Defendant. 5hen Defendant attempted to assert
rights, Defendant was sub>ected to abusi/e and threatening treatment by prosecutor.
#pecific allegations of wrongLdoing
The arresting officer, on coercing Defendant to enter into a misleading contract acted with intent that
Defendant be denied in his most basic right to an eCamining trial in /iolation of #ection <T..< TeCas
Penal )ode and #ection <6.9H TeCas Penal )ode.
The court clerk, by purporting to hold an arraignment hearing impersonated a >udicial officer and
caused Defendant to be forced to return for a second arraignment hearing in /iolation of #ection
<T..< TeCas Penal )ode and #ection <6.9H TeCas Penal )ode.
Presiding Kudge effected abuse of process by summoning Defendant to a hearing held by prosecuting
attorney wherein Defendant was threatened and berated by prosecutor in order to coerce an improper
plea bargain from Defendant, in /iolation of #ection <T..< TeCas Penal )ode and #ection <6.9H TeCas
Penal )ode.
Prosecuting attorney, in impersonation of a >udicial officer, held a hearing to which Defendant was
summoned by process, with no >udicial officer present for the purpose of eCtorting an improper plea
bargain from Defendant in /iolation of #ections <;.-- and <T..< TeCas Penal )ode.
5here se/eral people act together in pursuit of unlawful act, each one is liable for collateral crimes,
e/en though unplanned and unintended, if those crimes are foreseeable, ordinary and probable
conse0uences of preparation or eCecution of the unlawful act. )urtis /. #tate A)r.App. -T;HB 3;<
#.5.6d 6-T. )riminal ,aw 3TA9B
Arresting officer, court clerk, prosecuting attorney, and presiding >udge all acted in concert and
collusion toward denying Defendant in the due course of the laws of the #tate of TeCas in /iolation of
#ection -3..6 TeCas Penal )ode.
The purpose of this impressi/ely per/asi/e re0uirement of criminal procedure is plain. A democratic
society, in which respect for the dignity of all men is central, naturally guards against the misuse of the
law enforcement process. _eal in tracking down crime is not in itself an assurance of soberness of
>udgment. Disinterestedness in law enforcement does not alone pre/ent disregard of cherished
liberties. 'Cperience has therefore counseled that safeguards must be pro/ided against the dangers of
the o/erPealous as well as the despotic. The awful instruments of the criminal law cannot be entrusted
to a single functionary. The complicated process of criminal >ustice is therefore di/ided into different
parts, responsibility for which is separately /ested in the /arious participants upon whom the criminal
law relies for its /indication. *.# / 1cabb, <-H *.#. <<6,<9< Z; =< #. )t. =.H, ZZ;H; ,. 'd. H-T,
ZZZ; -T9< *.#.
Presiding >udge dis0ualified
The presiding >udge in the instant cause, ha/ing been accused of the abo/e indi/idual criminal acts
and the act of conspiring with others toward the depri/ation of the rights of the accused may not be
considered free from bias in the instant cause. They are professionals who TA8' pay to know the law.
*nder the doctrine of trespass ab initio, where a party eCceeds an authority gi/en by law, the party
loses the benefit of the >ustification and is considered a trespasser ab initio, although to a certain eCtent
the party followed the authority gi/en. The law will then operate retrospecti/ely to defeat all acts done
under the color of lawful authority. American 1ortg. )orp. /. 5yman 9- #.5.6d 6;. ATeC. )i/. App.
Austin -T<- Thus, a person who enters on real property lawfully pursuant to a conditional or
restricted consent and remains after his or her right to possession terminates and demand is made for
his or her remo/al becomes a trespasser from the beginning, and the law will then operate
retrospecti/ely to defeat all acts done by him under color of lawful authority. 5illiams /. 4arnett, =.H
#.5.6d ;T9 ATeC. )i/. App. 5aco -TH.B.
The rule applies to the acts of sheriffs and other officers, as well as to the conduct of pri/ate
indi/iduals. American 1ortg. )orp. /. 5yman
)riminal conspiracy
The arresting officer, court clerk, prosecuting attorney, and presiding >udge ha/e all acted in concert
and collusion with one another in order to perpetrate a fraud on persons accused of crimes under the
Transportation )ode. &r other A+) agency list acting in concert toward the perpetration of multiple
6T
schemes which ha/e the effect if disenfranchising the public of the due course of the laws, it must
reasonable be construed they ha/e conspired toward the indicated outcome.
-3..6. TeCas Penal )ode )riminal )onspiracy
A person commits criminal conspiracy if, with intent that a felony be committedD
he agrees with one or more persons that they or one or more of them engage in conduct that would
constitute the offense; and
he or one or more of them performs an o/ert act in pursuance of the agreement.
An agreement constituting a conspiracy may be inferred from acts of the parties.
It is no defense to prosecution for criminal conspiracy thatD
one or more of the coLconspirators is not criminally responsible for the ob>ect offense;
one or more of the coLconspirators has been ac0uitted, so long as two or more coLconspirators ha/e not
been ac0uitted;
one or more of the coLconspirators has not been prosecuted or con/icted, has been con/icted of a
different offense, or is immune from prosecution;
the actor belongs to a class of persons that by definition of the ob>ect offense is legally incapable of
committing the ob>ect offense in an indi/idual capacity; or
the ob>ect offense was actually committed.
An offense under this section is one category lower than the most serious felony that is the ob>ect of
the conspiracy, and if the most serious felony that is the ob>ect of the conspiracy is a state >ail felony,
the offense is a )lass A misdemeanor. o claim of accident or ignorance
It may not be construed any of the actors were somehow ignorant of the re0uirements of the law. 'llis
/. *nited #tates, as followsD ?If a man intentionally adopts certain conduct in certain circumstances
known to him, and that conduct is forbidden by the law under those circumstances, he intentionally
breaks the law in the only sense in which the law e/er considers intent. ?"e who is threatened by a
sane, rational , new point of /iew. can hardly >udge the future. "e knew not what he did. &f course,
willful conduct cannot make definite that which is undefined. Ignorance only needs curing one time.
5illful /iolators of constitutional re0uirements, will attack which ha/e been defined, certainly are in
no position to say that they had no ade0uate ad/ance notice that they would be /isited with
punishment. 5hen this game ends and the acts willfully done on record, in open defiance to facts,
logic or law 7 in reckless disregard of any "uman, )i/il, atural, or constitutional re0uirement which
has been made specific and definite. 5hen they are con/icted for so acting, they are not punished for
/iolating an unknowable something but the law of all man.
Defendant mo/es the court to dis0ualify itself until the resolution of the criminal allegations now
prepared and ready for presentation to a >ury, orth Dakota does not ha/e a grand >ury, a court of
redress, or an educated >ury system that understands these issues of corruptions. I 1AD' #*!' A,,
'1P,&('D "'!' 8'5. They did not hear us.
&lmstead / *.#., 66; *.#. 9H3, A-T6HB which states, QDecency, security and liberty alike demand that
go/ernment officials shall be sub>ected to the same rules of conduct that are commands to the citiPen.
In a go/ernment of laws, eCistence of the go/ernment will be imperiled if it fails to obser/e the law
scrupulously. &ur go/ernment is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. $or good or ill, it teaches the
whole people by its eCample. )rime is contagious. If the go/ernment becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds
contempt for the law; it in/ites e/ery man to become a law unto himself; it in/ites anarchy. To declare
that in the administration of the criminal law the end >ustifies the means ` would bring terrible
retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine this court should resolutely set its face.
II. #TAT'1'T &$ $A)T#
A))&*T ),&#'D
)losing balance dueD F....
#incerely, 'D )*!TI# AD ),I'T 8&5
Affiant hereby and herein accept your oath of office as your open and binding offer of contract to form
a firm and binding, pri/ate, bilateral contract between you and me in which you agree to perform all of
your promises and uphold all of my rights.
$urther, I hereby and herein claim my right to common law >urisdiction and
<.
refuse statutory >urisdiction. The foregoing ?otice of Acceptance of the &ath of &ffice? is an
instrument in commerce and is made eCplicitly under reser/e and without recourse. $ailure to respond
to this offer of contract within three business days of receipt establishes your unconditional acceptance
of the foregoing and your promise to uphold all of rights.%erificationD I declare under penalty of
per>ury under the laws of the *nited #tates of America that the foregoing is true and correct. 'Cecuted
at armSs length, under duress, with the intent to protect the public need to report this crime *nder
whistle blowers laws and protections.
A4!''1'T T& !')'I%' $'D'!A, !'#'!%' &T'# T'D'!'D A# PA(1'T #.). <=L
<L=.9 A-BA6B $&! +AI, &! APP',,AT' +&D
Affiant , the undersigned >udicial officers, being duly authoriPed by law to collect money;for )ourt
costs, +AI,, and:or APP',,AT' +&D#, which shall be collected in the lawful money of account of
the *nited #tates only, am aware that money is defined inD
!)5 H9..9..=. Q1oney,R QmoneysR a A-T=- DefinitionB
Q1oneyR or QmoneysR shall be held to mean gold and sil/er coin, gold and sil/er certificates. treasury
notes, *nited #tates notes, and bank notes.R !)5 H9..9..=. Q1oney,R Qmoneys.R a A-TTH
Definition@B QQ1oneyR or QmoneysR shall be held to mean coin or paper money issued by the *nited
#tates go/ernment.R
I know or should know that the *nited #tates go/ernment does not issue paper money. I know or
should know that the $ederal !eser/e issues paper money, and loans it to the *nited #tates
4o/ernment thereby making it impossible to pay!!!
QDue process of law does not mean a statute passed for the purpose of working a wrong.R D'I# /.
1&#'#., -H 5ash. 3<;, at 3T3 A$ebruary -3, -HTHB
Q+ut the legislature specifically disclaimed any intention to change the meaning of any statute. And
bringing fraud upon the court and trespass to law.
The compilers of the )ode were not empowered by )ongress to amend eCisting law, and
doubtless had no thought of doing so ...R 5arner /. 4oltra, 6T< *.#. -33, -=-, ;T ,. 'd. 639, 33 #. )t.
9=. .
..T"' A)T +'$&!' *# D&'# &T P*!P&!T T& A1'D A #')TI& &$ A A)T,
&,( A #')TI& &$ A )&1PI,ATI& 'TIT,'D Q!'%I#'D )&D' &$ 5A#"I4T&,R
5"I)" I# &T T"' ,A5. #*)" A A)T P*!P&!TI4 T& A1'D &,( A #')TI& &$
T"' P!I1A $A)I' )&1PI,ATI& &$ $!A*D and ,'A%'# T"' ,A5 *)"A4'D. 'n
+anc.R PA!&#A /. TA)&1A, 3;5n.A6dB 9.T, 9--, 9-6, 9-<, 9-3, 96- ADec.66, -T=.B
!)5 HT.<..;69 Delin0uency and sale in general impro/ement and di/isional districts a !edemption
in coin to treasurer a To whom credited Q!edemption must be made in gold or sil/er coin, as pro/ided
for the collection of state and county taCes ...R
The power of the state to declare a legal tender is limited to gold and sil/er coin. All Qlawful moneyR
of the *nited #tates is not a legal tender for pri/ate obligations by the laws of the *nited #tates; .
The legal tender and gold contract decisions,taken in connection with the recent case of
5oodruff /. #tate of 1ississippi, -=6 *.#. 6T- A-= #up. )t. H6.B, are controlling
here.R D'I# /. 1&#'#., -H 5ash. 3<;L=.- A$ebruary -3,-HTHB. And;
+ank ote is defined as QA promissory note issued by a bank or banker authoriPed to do so. payable to
bearer a, demand. And intended to circulate as money.R +lacks ,aw Dictionary A#iCth 'ditionB
Therefore, it follows that N$ederal !eser/eO Qotes are not payments.R Don '. 5illiams )o. /s.
)omm. Int. !e/., 3-,. 'd. 6d 9H A-T;;B. And;
The indi/idual cannot be compelled to use Xfederal money,
Mnor federal negotiable instruments, $ederal otes A#wanson /. $uline, 69H $. #upp. <=9B the federal
reser/e being a pri/ate corporation A,ewis /. *.#., =H. $.6d -6<H at -69-B which is engaged in
commercial acti/ity by law of merchants A*)) ;6-L-L-.<B And;
I am aware that it is a /iolation of law to demand and:or collect any tender eCcept the lawful moneys
of account of the *nited #tates which is specified at Article I, #ection H. Paragraph 3, and Article I,
#ection -.. paragraph -, of the )onstitution of the *nited #tates of America,which is the supreme law
of the land and mandatory for a firm and binding contract upon this honorable court pursuant to article
<-
I,section 6< and article %I, sectionMs 9 7 3of the )onstitution and that lawful money meeting these
constitutional re0uirements has not been a/ailable to the general public since about -T=9.
I know:or should know that $ederal !eser/e otes are defined as Q&+,I4ATI&# &$ T"' *IT'D
#TAT'#R at section H of Title -H *.#.). which are not taCable by
the #tate pursuant to <- *.#.) <-69 and are not the Qlawful money of the *nited #tatesR,
as the term applies in the code and $ederal !eser/e otes are not specifically described in the code,
because it makes & promise to pay QmoneyR to the bearer on demand as re0uired by article < of the
*niform )ommercial )ode and therefore does &T e/en rise to the le/el of a note. $urther
tender is defined asDA*))B #outh )arolina #tatutes, )hapter <=, )hapter <, Part = Discharge, or
#ection <=L<L=.9 L Tender of payment.Q#')TI& <=L<L=.9. Tender of payment. Any party making
tender of full payment to a holder when or after it is due is discharged to the eCtent of all subse0uent
liability for interest, costs and attorneySs fees. 1y time defending myself with no contract or /ictim is
F3.. per hour and F-.,... per rights /iolations I encounter or suffer.
A6B The holders refusal of such tender wholly discharges any party who has a right of
recourse against the party making the tender.
RA )ity employee, whether clerk of court 1unicipal:District:#uperior )ourt >udge or any
Administrati/e ,aw )lerk of this )ounty, must admit that you are a $oreign Agent as defined and
described at 66 *#) =--, and that you ha/e sought to defraud me, with a seditious conspiracy to
o/erthrow my lawful go/ernment and bring fraud to the people of this county. "a/e you personally
filed with the Attorney 4eneral a true and complete registration statement for your oath of office and
supplements thereto as re0uired by subsections AaB and AbB of 66 *#) =-6 I do now, by authority of
this court of record in malfeasance, misfeasance, nonLfeasance and per>ury of my rights and duties as a
human and by article %I,sectionMs 9 7 3
&ath of &ffice contract to the #tate )onstitution 7 $ederal )onstitution,
I am now forced to make 5ritten complaint to protect me and my neighbors from >oining this
conspiracy of silence, I did report crime. I ask (ou return this with wet ink signatures of all names on
record that the Affiant is liable to make payment or tender in $ederal !eser/e otes in the amount
specified. regarding this action:)ause@ 5hen will arrest warrant be issued by this county or state for
my arrest@
!efusal to sign this demand is a refusal to accept my debt payment tendered, and therefore I ha/e
discharged the demanded Amount listed below Pursuant to the authority of #) <=L<L=.9A6B by
refusing to sign acknowledgment of receipt of this ) Q<=L<L=.9A-B tender of payment.for the R,aw
'nforcement Agency shall present prima facia proof of a legitimate claim or account settles in full
and closes in ten days upon receipt hereof.creditor
DI#"&&*!A+,' D'$A*,T.
+y attempting to ad>udge, legislate, enforce &! #'T any fee without proof of any )rime,alleged
&!D'!# without The Truth, The 5hole Truth and othing but the Truth presented, 5IT"
"&'#T(, by both sides, to an impartial >ury are 'JP!'##,( P!&"I+IT'D, by but not limited to,
the ?+ills of Attainder )lause? Nas Titles of obility, +ills of Pains and Penalties, ?$ines?, +ills of
)reditO in /iolation of the &ath of &ffice, +reaching 4ood +eha/ior, as 'Ctortion, +lackmail and
+ribery, )riminal Acts /olition of !.I.).&, 1onopoly laws, pyramid schemes, the "obbs and
#herman antitrust Acts; Title -H Y 69-, 69-)olorable ,aw; 5illful abuses of a public authority, to the
oppression of the sub>ect, and e/ery species of official 'Ctortion, are offense s against the go/ernment,
for which the persons who commit them may be indicted and punished according to the #upreme law
of the land. I, T"' ?Alleged Accused?, gi/e this my ?otice of Desire to Pay all $ines, $ees, )osts, 7
Penalties 7 %oid Kudgment ? to ?T"' #TAT'?, Through the )lerk of the )ounty district court but it
would cause a criminal act and cause much duress. Due to the )onstitution of the *nited #tates of
America, Article -, Y -., )lause -, which mandates, ?o state shall . . . make any Thing but gold 7
sil/er coin a Tender in Payment of Debts?, said clause remains *!'P'A,'D to date, 7,
Due to the T))rP 9<..6 Payable in money, which states, ?All recogniPable, bail bonds, 7
undertakings of any kind, whereby a party become bound to pay money to the #tate, 7 all fines 7
forfeitures of a pecuniary character, shall be collected in the lawful money of the *ntied #tates only?,
7 Due to -6 *#) Y -36, which states, ? ` the terms ?lawful money? 7 the ?lawful money of the
<6
*nited #tates? shall be construed to mean gold 7 sil/er coin of the *nited #tates `? 7 Due to -6
*#) Y 9--, which states, ?` $ederal reser/e notes, to be issued at the discretion of the $ederal
!eser/e +oard ` for the purpose of making ad/ances to the $ederal reser/e banks through the
$ederal reser/e agents as hereinafter set forth 7 for no other purpose, are hereby authoriPed. The said
notes shall be obligations of the *nited #tates ` They shall be redeemed in lawful money on demand
at the Treasury Dept. of the *nited #tates, in the city of 5ashington, District of )olumbia, or at an
$ederal !eser/e bank`? 7
Due to -H *#) Y H, which states, ?The term ?obligation or other security of the *nited #tates?
includes, all bonds, certificates of indebtedness, national bank currency, $ederal !eser/e notes, ` 7
other representati/es of /alue, of whate/er denomination, issued under any Act of )ongress? 7
Due to <- *#) Y 3--6, which states, ?`The #ec. of the Treasury may mint 7 issue only the
following coinsD ` A;B a 3. dollar gold coin that is <6.; millimeters in diameter, weighs <<.T<-
grams, 7 contains - troy oP. of fine gold `? 7
Due to 9H stat. 6, A1arch .T, -T<<B 7 9H #tat. --<, AKune .3, -T<<B all gold coin was remo/ed from
common circulation, at par, at the banks in these united #tates of America, said statutes remain
*!'P'A,'D to date 7,
Due to )lark /. #tate < )r. ! <<H A-H;;B ?A promissory note cannot be accepted for payment of a
fine?,
Additionally, the said alleged debtAsB 7 : or >udgmentAsB is:are /oid by reason of the fact the plaintiff
failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
I am constrained by the law from paying these fineAsB and fees` because there is no ?lawful money?
to be properly 7 lawfully accepted in the discharge of this AtheseB alleged debtAsB, and or >udgmentAsB.

DI#)*##I&D
5atch; Police #tate 9 The !ise of $'1A. It #"&5# The camps are for $oreign agents, It is time to
look up, not down at us for sharing this with you.
I mean no disrespect but when you know, (&* 8&5, I see (&* A,, as either useful idiots or the
most e/il people to e/er walk this planet. )"&&#' 5"&..
Today, I li/e in one of the most corrupt counties of the most corrupts of states, in the most dangerous
countries that has e/er eCisted, I see, 5e are +( $A!, The most brainwashed, poisoned, robbed,
numbed down, regulated, indebted and ensla/ed people this planet has e/er seen. 5' A!' this worlds
terrorists. I "&P', because you were ignorant. The fact is (ou T&&8 my clients earnings, remained
silent to 4o/ernment actions and are a paid professional, These are the only actions that has e/er
/iolated my rights, freedoms or threatened my safety. People like (&* DID T"I#, you did not stop
the ones who did. 5ithout my consent while we paid you to ser/e and protect *# from the /ery
actions this action has committed on me and millions of others, thousands of times, in countless ways,
'%'!( DA(. 1ost &fficers of the court seem to do things that add no benefit to my life but keep my
mind bust defending from the predator kind, hunting me for sport and profit. I can not help but to see
your whole concepts of economics, earnings, education, health care or the goals of law and >ustice as
almost -..U backwards and up side down. 5e wish to turn you right. The world I see is no where
near the path you are on. The proof for all is; this world.. I seek to lea/e &' &$ IT to our kids. &ne
of us is the problem (&*! 5I,$*, I4&!A)'. &! 1( thinking, honestly. I see 6 different
mind mentalities, (ours has hurt me and &nce you 8&5, you choose.
I see the massi/e damages your system has created with deliberate actions that scatters accountability
respectability and responsibility to the winds so no one can be blamed and e/eryone can hide behind a
fiction called T"' #TAT' . The curtain is falling like the 5I_A!D of &__ but with an ignorant,
destroyed and /ery angry world, what will happen when it happens and you ha/e no where to hide@
one of the people who made histories greatest tyrants and mass murderers saw the e/il they were
doing. If A( &' in their gang had e/en a sli/er of common sense, human decency, honor, or
respect for their neighbor, they would ha/e stood. If you understood what power really is, (ou would
see yourself 5ith !eal the stuff. Power is what it takes to own and control your own life, It is a full
time >ob. #'' the P&,' sticking in your own eye W*IT trying to cut the sli/er in in my clients with a
chain saw. I see reality the one this world is &T I...('T
<<
4o/ernment I# a craPy thing when you can see with open eyes.
(ou take my money, buy canes, +reaks my legs, sell me a cane at a hefty profit. Then proclaim to all,
if it was not for 4&%., "' would not be able to walk!
In a ci/iliPed society e/eryone must follow 7 obey the law, including public ser/ants that are bound
by oath, affirmation 7 bond to uphold the laws of the *nited #tates 7 the #tate . I cannot concur with
the mythology that $ederal !eser/es otes are money when the law states otherwise. It is plain 7
clear, as a matter of law, as stated abo/e, that $ederal !eser/e otes, checks 7 or money orders, are
debt obligations 7 not within the definition of those things allowed by law by this state or to be
recei/ed by this 1*I)IPA, )&*!T of the )IT( &$ $A!4& #tate &f &!T" DA8&TA
oticeD Pursuant to TP), Title H, Y <=..T AaB ?` offers ` agrees ` any benefit ` that he knows the
public ser/ant is prohibited by law from accepting. AbB )lass ?A? 1isdemeanorSs.? Pursuant to TP),
Title H, Y <=..H Any and all threats to incarcerate AmeB for ?$ailure to Pay? will be deemed to be an
attempt to solicit an honorarium, a criminal act. ,ike eCtort , defraud perfidy or T!'A#&
Additional oteD Pursuant to )!A' /s. #TAT' &$ T'JA# case no. H<L-=3.; the *.#. )ourt of
Appeals, $ifth )ircuit heldD ?5e affirm the trial courts findings that the Dallas )ounty system of
issuing misdemeanorSs capias /iolated both TeCas law 7 the *nited #tates )onstitution`.?
)ontinuing to /iolate after 3th )ircuit otice, can be construed as a pattern of criminal beha/ior under
!I)&, with intent L se/ere criminal 7 ci/il penalties are a/ailable to end This conspiracy but I do not
ha/e a !'A#&A+,', P!*D'T or desire ?otice of Desire to Pay all $ines, $ees, )osts, Penalties
or %oid Kudgment. . I only see and care for T"' P&IT, (&* 5I,, un chain your sla/es and make
them whole. A peoples wealthLbased monetary system, is gi/ing, Then TA8I4 the entire pot. T"'
P&IT I#, "ow much /alue did you add to this world@ (ou claim to be my leaders but Their is &
way we will not be at war. *ntil you lea/e. (ou should do it before we throw you out, 5ho needs
neighbor s that lie, cheat, steal and destroy@ I D& &T #*PP&!T T'!!&!I#1, and as pro/en, This
4o/ernment fiction here I# the only damage I ha/e e/er suffered It would /iolate the law and T"'
P&IT of both law and >ustice.
1&TI& To Dis0ualify All Kudges and $or )hange of %enue To a *nited #tates court of
)onstitutional authority and respect.
I 1o/e to dis0ualify A,, )ircuit )ourt >udges and for a change of /enue to another )ircuit )ourt
because of my political /iews and political history on record in /arious states that create una/oidable
bias against me. This is the only way to ha/e a fair trial and preser/e my ),I'T# rights and
freedoms, as the law is for.
In closing, &TI)' &$ "uman right treaty /iolations
ToD The clerk of court, Please pass this to the go/ernor and to the secretary of #tate,
ot T"' #TAT' a religious association. whereas I ha/e eChausted all my domestic remedies within
T"' #TAT'. I now gi/e you notice I 1*#T )"A!4' The county of 5IT" human rights
/iolations. $or each and e/ery officialSs refusal to uphold the constitution. Please inform your sheriff
you ha/e disgraced , /iolated, and failed to keep your word or uphold the law of the land and the
legislators ha/e failed to remo/e you from office for failure to up hold the law. The county
)ommissioners and the county >udges failed to uphold the law, The #heriffs, 1arshals, Police, or
military do not collect their pay in gold or sil/er thus /iolating their oaths. The right to due process by
law and for the good of society in general, It is time for you to lea/e me alone. I would be a criminal
if I aided a gang of criminals terrorists that has taken my ,iberty my property and ha/e damaged me
mentally, physically, educationally, economically, religiously, and permanently. 1y property, 1y
time, and my security has been used, stolen and destroyed. (ou ha/e used abused, oppressed,
kidnapped and /iolated me with no care, concern, or thought of what your actions did to a lot of li/es.
Their is no protection, no redress, compensation, o +ill of !ights, eCpectation of >ustice, or doubt of
your moti/es. (our -; million A P&IT laws are T"' ,A5. (&* do not mandate a constitutional
court of due process law or a court be a/ailable to any one but at your leisure as their is profit in these
cages you built for us to be safe.. All courts shall be open, and all person or reputation, shall ha/e
remedy by due course of law. &r their is to be no laws impairing the obligation of contracts, #la/ery,
Treason, or law means anything any gun can grab. Their is o debtors prisons, 5e will be heard, o
tidal of nobility, or a cent of real wealth in any bank. 5e eat poisoned foods, water, and air. The world
<9
hates us because we are free and the list is endless of how upside down we ha/e really become. 5"(
did e/eryone stand when a guy in a black dress walked in@ '%'!(&', but I 5"& #T&&D, stood,
5hile e/eryone sat@ To add insult to in>ury, they all called them ?"&&*!A+,'?.And (&*!
"&&!@ ?5hat part of shall not be infringed? )onfuses you@ There shall be established in each
county in this #tate a )ounty )ourt, which shall be a court of record in each county, with 0ualified
)ounty #heriff, who shall be well informed in the law of the #tate and bound by oath. #o what is the
need with all these people Taking my earnings to protect and defend my rights@ Then taking them
whene/er they want@ Tricks like All rights reser/ed, without pre>udiced , the )&#TIT*TI&, ,A5
or D*T( when all these people are taking my time, my wealth,and security to protect me from who@ I
#'' the hundreds of scams and schemes to keep *# defending from the -; million A P&IT#,you
use, forcing us into Defending $!&1 your actions. I #'' (&*, T"' P&IT; &f life, of freedom,
,aw, Kustice, wealth, The knowledge of 4ood or e/il, lawful or criminal, hea/en or hell is not in any
of you with your system training s@ 5hat gi/es A(&', in, A( 5A(, e/en the right to think they
ha/e a right to treat another fellow human this way@ 5hat e/er, you think you fiC, you destroy, by
design. I possess '5, solid ground that this read will show the post in your eye. 5ill we hunt you
down and punish you as &T ignorant barbarian but for your actions (&* ha/e done 5IT" A
1A,I)' that clearly re/eals the flaw in your reasoning a mile deep and 6 miles wide.
A right is not gi/en or taken from anyone that li/es in actual reality without a crime and that is proof
that this court is dangerous and in on a world wide seditious conspiracy to o/erthrow 1(
4&%'!1'T. That if I did to you, T"' 'JA)T #A1' 5A(, I would be prison. A( thought to
e/en think that you ha/e a right when bound by contract is /iolated, the right to force your beliefs on
me with a swat team working for some of the most dangerous people this planet has e/er faced is no
longer done in ignorance..
$'' #)"'D*,'D
A. Ten A-.B troy ounces of .TTT pure gold Aor its e0ui/alentB per /iolation of any of my
unalienable rights under any and all circumstances. Included in these rights hereby claimed are my
right to make use of roads, buses, train, and air stations; the right to engage in trade and habitation
peacefully.
+. &ne A-B troy ounce of .TTT pure gold Aor its e0ui/alentB per hour at a rate doubling e/ery 69
hours for any of my time consumed in detention, imprisonment, or attempts by an
employees:public officers:magistrates:>udges:agents:citiPens to establish >urisdiction o/er
myself or my family or my guests without my eCpress written consent.
). &ne A-B troy ounce of .TTT pure gold Aor its e0ui/alentB per hour for any of my time
consumed while being -B detained by any man:woman acting under color of law; 6B stopped by any
statuteLenforcing officer from any legal department and:or corporation.
,et it be clear that a people is not a person; a person is not a people. True so/ereignty in
America and within all free nations on 'arth lies with the li/ing and breathing people who ha/e all
rights endowed by our )reator, 4od. )itiPens are sub>ects of the $ederal, #tate, and ,ocal municipal
go/ernment corporations. )itiPens ha/e consented to eCchange their unalienable rights for pri/ileges
and immunity. ,et it be clear, therefore, that I do not delegate my rights nor do I consent to be treated
as a )itiPen. $urther, I am not, nor is anyone in my $amily, an Animal. &r ?Person in your statues and
codes. ,et it be clear that I am not a person:citiPen:employee:officer and:or sub>ect of any corporation,
which may be operating under color of law. ,et it be clear, therefore, that I hereby declare that I am
one of the people, the competent and so/ereign power that controls all
go/ernments. ,et it be clear that I am endowed by my creator, 4od, with unalienable rights as /ested
by 4od in the people within these united states of America.
This is a lawful paper to be enforced by the people and for the people on the land commonly known as
America, in any court within a state known as orth Dakota and in any court within this union known
as the united states of America.The #upreme )ourt has stated, T6 *# 33-D *# / )ruikshank, QThe
people of the *nited #tates resident within any #tate are sub>ect to two 4o/ernmentsD one #tate, and
the other ational; but there need be no conflict between the two. The powers which one possesses,
the other does not. They are established for different purposes, and ha/e separate >urisdictions.
<3
Together they make one whole, and furnish the people of the *nited #tates with a complete
go/ernment,
ample for the protection of all their rights at home and abroad. True, it may sometimes happen that a
person is amenable to both >urisdictions for one and the same act...It is the natural conse0uence of a
citiPenship which owes allegiance to two so/ereignties, and claims protection from both. The citiPen
cannot complain, because he has /oluntarily submitted himself to such a form of go/ernment.R 5e
ne/er knowingly, willingly, or with any disclosure submitted to anything. "ow can fraud, backed by
force be law@
&TI)' &$ $'' #)"'D*,' $&! P!&T')TI& $!&1 )&!P&!AT' A+*#', $A,#'
A!!'#T, %I)TI1,'## )"A!4'#, AD +I,,# &$ ATTAID'!
,et it be clear that the preceding statements do not pertain to me alone, a people. I am not a Qpeople of
the *nited #tates,R which is a corporation, nor am I a legal or corporate person as described abo/e. ,et
it be clear that I do not consent to this form of de facto corporate go/ernment, and that I am not
submitting myself /oluntarily to it.
&n the contrary, I am a people as recogniPed in AmericaMs founding documents, including the 1agna
)arta, The Articles of )onfederation, the Declaration of Independence, and the original )onstitution
for the united states of America.
I am putting it in this A$$IDA%IT &$ "&'#T( To cure the ignorance of 5"( T"I# I# ''D'D
"'!'. &ur sla/ery, Is a war crime. &nce you know the truth, you choose who and what you really
are, that goes for e/eryone. +ecause most do not know, 5e are the most brainwashed, robbed,
regulated, poisoned, dumb ed down, bankrupted, ensla/ed and destroyed people in the history of the
entire human race. Is why we are. 5e contracted because 5' 5I,, &T ,'A%' T"I# T& &*!
8ID#. Kust read the declaration of independence, them people had it good. .
A$$IDA%IT &$ "&'#T( P*+,I) !')&!D. I 'd )urtis, A lawfully, legally contracted
fiduciary for the person who submitted this to you, now in distress. 5e come in peace and the same
mission as you. To ser/e and protect our neighbors. 1y client contracted with me freely.
$iduciary for the accused.
Q*D'! P'A,TI'# &$ P'!K*!(R.
*nder 4odMs laws there is no contract between me and the *#. The )&*!T &$ T"' )IT( nor
any working for the $ederal, #tate, or )ity )orporation. Therefore now ha/ing >oiner under the same
flag and 4od in a firmLbinding contract. I demand you uphold your end of the contract as laid down by
our )reator in "is "oly 5ord and declare in the organic )onstitutionAsB and subse0uent #tate
)harterAsB with all other &aths and Affirmations notwithstanding, including any registration with the
#ecretary of #tate as being a $oreign Agent. Therefore you are now liable for the protection of all my
so/ereign reser/ed rights in the common law and commerce, which are inalienable, unalienable, and
imprescriptibly rights. Absent the abo/e stated contract, I do not know who you are nor do I
understand the intent of your document nor can I make a legal determination about what you are
asking. Absent the abo/e stated contract you and I ha/e, I do not recogniPe you, for you ha/e failed to
identify yourself as one with delegated regulatory authority o/er me or made your offer under the
penalty of per>ury, 5ithout the abo/e worded contract, you must be a Third Party $oreign Debt
)ollector, and you are hereby $ired in your attempt to represent me or client. I D& &T #P'A8
4&%'!1'T. I did not gi/e you permission to make a legal determination against me. #o, I do not
belie/e there is any legal or lawful significance to your correspondence, whatsoe/er. I do not belie/e
there is a legal duty or lawful duty to do anything you ha/e stated or said in your action, whether it is
to file some sort of form, pay some fine, or pay some taC, or gi/e up something. (our correspondence
is beyond me for you act as one:many that has authority & to. Please mail your document. 5ithout
obtaining my permission and do not fail to sign your offer in ink stating your authority or sign under
the penalty of per>ury.
Absent your adherence to the abo/e )ontract, I do not recogniPe you or understand what your
intent is in your document or action. 5ithin the < day )ontract ,aw,first, under the abo/e contract,
show me the law and intent that re0uires a li/ing soul and so/ereign and American, to do whate/er it
is you are trying to do. I make this redraft of your offer back to you under contract law and the penalty
of per>ury, < days and we ha/e the abo/e contract, ; days you ha/e defaulted, -. days, I ha/e a
<=
#ummary Kudgment. I ha/e also accepted the #TAT'1'T &$ ',')T'D:APP&IT'D &$$I)'!:
&ath of &ffice of the )orporate #tate , 1ayor of the )ity of
&TI)' &$ & L!'#P&#' #'
+e it known to all interested parties that there has not been any timely response to A$$IDA%IT
&$ "&'#T(
222222222222222222222222222222 dated 6.22,
)lient and 'D )*!TI# by 'd )urtis; such response to ha/e been made toD
c:o otary Acceptance Aotary nameB a otary Public
I wish '%'!(T"I4 in this file for disco/ery in -. days mailed to
1ail to D 'd )urtis
T69 3th street #.
$argo, .D. 5AA+'"'!DV&*T,&&8.)&1 I will supply =G gigs of study with
an email dismissing this. In the best interest of my client. I put this together as a show of o/er
whelming force I hope you will fully understand what massi/e damage ignorance has created to this
world. I wish you the best and hope this knowledge cured you. I ask for you to dismiss this. #end me a
tip if this slap in the face woke you up, or for 6. bucks, I can send this to 63 thousand contacts! I ha/e
= gigs of library collected o/er the years all on line and free, 5rite me and I will send you in the right
direction and undo the wrongs, you did. (&* are in the perfect place to change the world before the
* T!&&P# come and ..well,. They can not arrest a fiction. T"' #TAT' co/er will not protect you
from your actions.
affida/it of honesty & $'A!! gi/e this to A,, /ictims;&$ T"' )&*!T I )&*!T &
!')&!DbA#8b
)an I be heard on this court record@ yes or no@ TA,8 ,&*D 1A8' T"'1!
\Always wait for them to answer on record] 8nowledgeE & $'A!
Is this an article < constitutional court of due process@ yes or no@
?Is this a ci/il or criminal court I am being prosecuted in@? if
)!I1IA, )&!TD I wish to confront my accuser and call my /ictim to the stand, I do not recall any
of this crime I ha/e committed@
)I%I, )&*!TD I wish to eCamine this contract this court claims I knowingly and willingly signed
with anyone that would gi/e this court lawful >urisdiction to pursue these charges@ (ou are being paid
to protect and defend my rights, 5"( A1 I "'!'@ people in this court ha/e no eCcuse,you know the
law. I ask this court one more time, produce a /ictim or contract that I ha/e /iolated. I do not work
for T"' #TAT' and am under no contract that gi/es this court >urisdiction or proof of claim on my
time I am here under threat of arrest and duress.
1&!' %A,*A+,' AD ''D'D T"A &+A1A)A!', gi/e this to e/eryone you know!!
$!'' $*,, ,'4A, P!&T')TI& $&! A,, "*1A# & %I)TI1,'## )!I1' #P!''#!
T"' &,( 8&5,'D4' ,A5 T&&, (&* 5I,, '%'! ''D! T"' "&'#T( A$$IDA%IT,
simply P!IT, #T*D(, #I4 AD (&*! T!I44'!'D $&! +ATT,', $&! )A! AD "&1',
&! )&*!T D& &T ,'A%' 5IT"&*T IT more tools for fun and profit@ 4et the honesty affida/it
into all in your court! T"' #TAT' . %# T!*T", T"' ,A5 7 K*#TI)' $&! A,,. T"'(
$&!)'D *# T& 1A8' &*! )"&I)', 1A8' (&*!#. Please key in #ilent weapons for 0uiet
wars, 5e D& meet the definition, %I)TI1# &$; 4'&)ID', T!'A#&, )!I1'# A4AI#T
"*1AIT(, +!'A)" &$ )&T!A)T, )&#PI!A)(, T'!!&!I#1, T& A1' A $'5
P!&%A+,' )"A!4'#. I ha/e proof in my files I collected o/er the years. 5A! )!I1'# A!'
$&!'%'!.T"I# I# #'!I&*# ..#I,')' is not an option. 5e li/e in fear, #TADI4 & T"'
,A5 5' PA( $&!@ $or crimes against a fiction of T"' #TAT'@ They want us in >ail until we gi/e,
we want the same.IT I# I 1( +&&8. please read &ur story and stand, Download
httpD::www.scribd.com:doc:H=39.6;=:ewLbutL&ldL8nowledge my free book 7 study this, It
applies to all. '/ery action has a reaction.
T"'( "A%' I4&!'D '%'!(T"I4 AD )"A!4'D, *# $&! T',,I4 T"'1, T"I#
A$$IDA%IT & ,I' httpD::www.scribd.com:doc:66<633.3<:A$$IDA%ITL&$L"&'#T( &n my
<;
siteD httpD::thefaC.webs.com: '/erything that was done before the fall of the aPiSs was legal and right,
until >ustice returned, These people took and oath and &*! PA(. 5' do not support terrorism, D&
(&*@ I ha/e '%'! met a more dangerous and destructi/e bunch. T"'( A!' &*! &,( $'A!
"'!'; It was not done in ignorance, I T&,D T"'1, T"'( )"&#'. watch;
httpsD::www.youtube.com:watch@/Ef1ImTI,/h)*
T"'#' %ID'&# 5I,, TA8' (&* T& (&*! P'!#&A, '5 5&!,D &!D'!!
httpsD::www.youtube.com:watch@/Ee%PA'oi.2w
The psychopath, (ou will ne/er know *TI, (&* learn to see them.
httpsD::www.youtube.com:watch@/EW9A8k$T;fc'
5as (our &ath #incere@
httpsD::www.youtube.com:watch@/EIkI8D8t!Wu(
The Declaration of atural !ights
httpsD::www.youtube.com:watch@/E'<d0=he3e0W
T*!I4 P&IT $&! "*1AIT( !!! It is D&'!!!
This one is (&*
httpsD::www.youtube.com:watch@/Ep865Kd3bJ$g
The 4reatest #peech '/er 1ade L )harlie )haplin
T"' #TAT' of orth Dakota all deser/e it, their deliberate indifference #T&,' e/erything from us.
They are terrorists in e/ery sense of the word. To start cleaning up this country, #TA!T "'!'.
Treason against the United States of America
Violation of Your Sworn OATH of Office
You. as a Public Official, who has Sworn an Oath of Office, to Defend, Protect, and Presere
the !onstitution for the united States of America against all enemies, both "oreign and
Domestic, as well as its !iti#ens, and to Honor it as the Su$reme %aw of the %and& defined
b' %aw as one owing Allegiance to the United States of America in 'our $osition of Public
Trust.
Your failure to honor 'our Sworn Oath (documented b' the within named Plaintiff) fulfills the
re*uirements of an Act of Treason as cited in the United States !onstitution, to wit+ ,in
le'ing war against them -the States and ,.e the Peo$le,/, or, in adhering to their enemies,
giing them aid and comfort.,T01ASO2, b' law, is $unishable b' the Death Penalt'.
Thus, an' iolation one3s Oath of Office, b' those Sworn and $aid to Honor the !onstitution
for the united States of America, is an oert act of treason against ,.e the Peo$le.,
Such acts are in contem$t of the law, affecting other Public Serants who ma' 3go along 4 to
get along,3 leading to the loss of confidence in 5oernment and eentual corru$tion in
5oernment. 6f lawlessness continues un4re$orted and un4$unished, t'rann' becomes 7ing
and 5oernment the 8aster. 6f enough citi#ens, $atriots, and !hristians understand this
traditional loe for %ife, %ibert', and the $ursuit of Ha$$iness, traditional in America 4 this will
not ha$$en. You. (the Accused, are now $ut on notice b' this letter, that 'our act(s) of
Treason are now $art of the Public 0ecord and war crimes are foreer.
This letter is deliered to 'ou, the Accused, showing that there is a legal file being $re$ared
for 'our $rosecution. The res$onsibilit' to document 'our Act(s) of Treason rests with the
Plaintiff. The Plaintiff has a legal obligation to ma7e 'our Act(s) of Treason 7nown to
5oernment Officials.(9: US! Section ;) and the moral res$onsibilit' to $ost this 2otice in
$ublic $laces near 'our $lace of business, or in the areas of 'our residence, as a Public
Serice. All local media will, also, in this $rocess, be full' informed.
"or 'our information, this letter will be entered as a !ourt 1<hibit, in addition to other
eidence, to document 'our Act(s) of Treason against ,.e the Peo$le,, when formal charges
and $roceedings are filed against 'ou. An Act of Treason against one indiidual, b' another 4
is an act against all. 6 was wrong thin7ing these $eo$le would sto$ and thin7 what the' were
doing.
T& #TA!T I think an educated society will end crime, These people think it would hurt their game,
*nder power of "*1A honesty, I A1 D'1ADI4 T"' A!!'#T# &$;
Police )hief 8eith A. Ternes kternesVcityoffargo.com
<H
Kudge #)&TT 4!I$$I #4riffethVndcourts.go/
#"'!I$$ PA*, ,A'(, laneypVcasscountynd.go/
#tates attorney +I!)" +*!DI)8 burdickbVcasscountynd.go/
'ither the * T!&&P# or (&* need to fiC it. These are war crimes. (&* A,, are only in power
until this money system falls. IT 5as set up to float the scum to the top on e/ery le/el and way, To
build hea/en or hell. &5 I# T"' TI1' '%'!( &' 5"& )A!'# IT I# TI1' T& ,&&8 *P
7 #''! (&* are the most +!AI5A#"'D, !&++'D, !'4*,AT'D AD '#,A%'D people to
e/er walk this planet. Please watch; httpsD::www.youtube.com:watch@/E=<P_=I.Wi&H (&*! &AT"
I# (&*! 5&!D. 5ho respects traitors @ 5"& would help the people who did it to us all but other
criminals@ 5here will you stand when this falls@ Prison, 4ra/e, 4allows or 5IT" *#@
A crime takes a /ictim for '%'!(&'S# protection. 5hen law is for all, '0ually, 5"'!' 5I,,
(&* +'@ httpD::www.lawfulpath.com:ref:o/k6kLscan.pdf
&P'!ATI& %A1PI!' 8I,,'! I# ''D'D +( A,, I T"' ,A5 '$&!)'1'T
ID*#T!( #ee the reading room of the ,awful path site and help educate. 5e know who (&* are.
T"AT I# 5"( 5' )&TA)T'D (&*. T& 4'T (&*! $!'' D!&P +&J, I will share more
studies. httpsD::db.tt:1Jc)/g1f
The P!I%A)( A)T &$ -T;9 APublic ,aw T<L3;TB, empowers citiPens to re0uire full, written
disclosure from a go/ernment officials who seeks information. )itiPens also ha/e the right, not to
testify against themsel/es. Thus, when ?the go/ernment? comes I ha/e the right to ha/e answers.
Public ,aw T<L3;T is to pro/ide certain safeguards for an indi/idual against in/asion of personal
pri/acy ?The following 0uestions are based upon that act and are necessary for this indi/idual to make
a reasonable determination concerning di/ulgence of information to this agency. ame of A,, public
ser/ants in/ol/ed in this causeD
Please add all the A1'# and email contacts answers on a separate piece of paper as sworn
testimony for disco/ery, D
222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222ame of
person in go/ernment re0uesting that this in/estigation be made@
Is this in/estigation ?general@? or is it ?special@?
D'PT; ID[
)ity 22222222222222222222222222222222222 #tate 222222222
A1'2222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222
2222 Personal ame And of department of go/ernment, bureau, or agency by which public ser/ant is
employedD
#uper/isorSs nameD 2222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222
&ffice mailing addressD
5ill public ser/ant uphold the )onstitution of the *nited #tates of America@ (es 222222 o
5I,, public ser/ant furnish proof of personal identity@ (es 222222 o 222222
furnish a copy of the law or regulation which authoriPes this in/estigation@ (es 222222 o
5ill the public ser/ant read aloud that portion of the law authoriPing the 0uestions he will ask@ (es
222222 o 222222222222
Are the citiPenSs answers /oluntary &r 1andatory@@ (es 222222 o 222222222222
Are the 0uestions to be asked based upon a specific law or regulation@ 222222
or are they being used as a disco/ery process@ (es 222222 o 222222222222
<T
5hat other uses may be made of this information@
5hat other agencies may ha/e access to this information@ 5hat will be the effect upon me
if I should choose to not answer any part of these 0uestions@
As a contracted fiduciary of the person who this was designed to protect, I ask e/ery chain of e/ent
officer of this action to fully identify themsel/es for my personal record of e/ents this material
eCplains. please mail answers to 'd )urtis T69 3th.st. #. $argo, .D, An historic e/ent will be taking
place and we wish to be "&'#T
It would be a crime not fully identifying yourself on public record or us not reporting the crimes
presented here for the good of the public.
Please accept this written re0uest for a certified copy of your personal &ath of &ffice and copy of
your #urety +ond, which is re0uired of any public official. (ou ha/e three days to pro/ide these
documents or you are in default.
'd )urtis T69 3th street #. $argo, .D.
Please make copy for e/ery chain of e/ent officer on this.
I ''D to get this fiCed and mass emailed out! I sent this through
httpD::www.gorillacontact.com:pricing.php . If you help, this war will be o/er sooner. I collected
o/er 6.. million contacts but & 1&'(, 1y car, business, career, $amily and life ha/e been
destroyed because no one knows this stuff@ I will send if you contact me, I will send the info for
credits to my account and gi/e = gigs of study material to start your public library! &,( T"'
'D*)AT'D A!' $!'', e/eryone is a threat to all until educated. They can not do it in the light,
#"I' +!I4"T!!! I will &T lea/e this to our kids, will you@

$or F6. bucks, I can send 63
thousand emails to help your cause and
educate your friends and neighbors. If
you send me your local area codes, I
can gather the list and promote for you!
(our fiCed freedom add!
P ! & & $ & $ # ' ! % I)
'
2222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222
#igned; #ui Kuris, +elligerent )laimant
I 2222222222222, A legal citiPen of the *nited #tates do hereby declare my legal and rightful
indi/idual so/ereignty from any 4o/ernment and itMs agencies that are in tyranny. &TI)' T&
P!I)IPA, I# &TI)' T& A4'T; &TI)' T& A4'T I# &TI)' T& P!I)IPA,

date2222222222222 )ase ;2222222222222222
#tateD 2222222222222222222222222 )ountyD 22222222222222222222222
5itlessness;
+efore me, 222222222222222222222222222222222222, a otary Public, on this day personally
appeared 22222222222222222222222222222222222222222222known to me or pro/ed to me with
/alid identification to be the indi/idual or li/ing soul whose name is subscribed to the foregoing
instrument and acknowledged to me that he:she eCecuted the same for the purposes and consideration
therein eCpressed. 4i/en under my hand and seal of office on this 222222 day of 2222222222222222,
6.22.
2222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222
A#eal of &fficeB
9.
#ignature of otary Public
22222222222222222222222222222222222
1y )ommission 'CpiresD 22222222222222222222222
9-