0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
36 просмотров13 страниц
MS methods for metals: in in-house validation and extension house validation and extension of field of application of methods from inland waters to transitional and sea and sea--water. Water.
Исходное описание:
Оригинальное название
Palonta_ICP-MS methods for metals_en.1235479234.pdf
MS methods for metals: in in-house validation and extension house validation and extension of field of application of methods from inland waters to transitional and sea and sea--water. Water.
MS methods for metals: in in-house validation and extension house validation and extension of field of application of methods from inland waters to transitional and sea and sea--water. Water.
ICP ICP- -MS methods for metals: MS methods for metals: in in house validation and extension house validation and extension in in--house validation and extension house validation and extension of field of application of methods of field of application of methods from inland waters to transitional from inland waters to transitional and sea and sea water water and sea and sea--water. water. Maria T. Palonta Maria T. Palonta Regional Environmental Protection Agency- Veneto Region LABORATORY REGIONAL DEPARTMENT VENICE LABORATORY SERVICE VENICE LABORATORY SERVICE VENICE LABORATORY SERVICE VENICE LABORATORY SERVICE Simitli (BG)- 02/17-19, 2009 SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY 11 BACKGROUND BACKGROUND 1. 1. BACKGROUND BACKGROUND 2. 2. CHARACTERS OF THE METHODS RECOMMENDED BY CHARACTERS OF THE METHODS RECOMMENDED BY THE EC DI RECTI VE THE EC DI RECTI VE 33 AVAI LABLE TECHNI QUES FOR METALS AVAI LABLE TECHNI QUES FOR METALS 3. 3. AVAI LABLE TECHNI QUES FOR METALS AVAI LABLE TECHNI QUES FOR METALS 4. 4. I CP I CP- - MS MS a. Definition a. Definition b P & C b P & C b. Pros & Cons b. Pros & Cons 5. 5. THE I SO 17294 THE I SO 17294-- 2 METHOD FOR THE ANALYSI S OF 2 METHOD FOR THE ANALYSI S OF METALS METALS 66 THE ADOPTED METHOD AND I TS I N THE ADOPTED METHOD AND I TS I N HOUSE HOUSE 6. 6. THE ADOPTED METHOD AND I TS I N THE ADOPTED METHOD AND I TS I N-- HOUSE HOUSE VALI DATI ON VALI DATI ON 7. 7. UNCERTAI NTY OF MEASURE UNCERTAI NTY OF MEASURE 88 EXTENTI ON FROM I NLAND WATERS TO EXTENTI ON FROM I NLAND WATERS TO 8. 8. EXTENTI ON FROM I NLAND WATERS TO EXTENTI ON FROM I NLAND WATERS TO TRANSI TI ONAL AND SEA TRANSI TI ONAL AND SEA-- WATERS WATERS 9. 9. MERCURY AS AN EXAMPLE OF PARTI CULARLY MERCURY AS AN EXAMPLE OF PARTI CULARLY COMPLEX I N COMPLEX I N HOUSE VALI DATI ON HOUSE VALI DATI ON COMPLEX I N COMPLEX I N-- HOUSE VALI DATI ON HOUSE VALI DATI ON SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY 11 BACKGROUND BACKGROUND 1. 1. BACKGROUND BACKGROUND 2. 2. CHARACTERS OF THE METHODS RECOMMENDED BY CHARACTERS OF THE METHODS RECOMMENDED BY THE EC DI RECTI VE THE EC DI RECTI VE 33 AVAI LABLE TECHNI QUES FOR METALS AVAI LABLE TECHNI QUES FOR METALS 3. 3. AVAI LABLE TECHNI QUES FOR METALS AVAI LABLE TECHNI QUES FOR METALS 4. 4. I CP I CP- - MS MS a. Definition a. Definition b P & C b P & C b. Pros & Cons b. Pros & Cons 5. 5. THE I SO 17294 THE I SO 17294-- 2 METHOD FOR THE ANALYSI S OF 2 METHOD FOR THE ANALYSI S OF METALS METALS 66 THE ADOPTED METHOD AND I TS I N THE ADOPTED METHOD AND I TS I N HOUSE HOUSE 6. 6. THE ADOPTED METHOD AND I TS I N THE ADOPTED METHOD AND I TS I N-- HOUSE HOUSE VALI DATI ON VALI DATI ON 7. 7. UNCERTAI NTY OF MEASURE UNCERTAI NTY OF MEASURE 88 EXTENTI ON FROM I NLAND WATERS TO EXTENTI ON FROM I NLAND WATERS TO 8. 8. EXTENTI ON FROM I NLAND WATERS TO EXTENTI ON FROM I NLAND WATERS TO TRANSI TI ONAL AND SEA TRANSI TI ONAL AND SEA-- WATERS WATERS 9. 9. MERCURY AS AN EXAMPLE OF PARTI CULARLY MERCURY AS AN EXAMPLE OF PARTI CULARLY COMPLEX I N COMPLEX I N HOUSE VALI DATI ON HOUSE VALI DATI ON COMPLEX I N COMPLEX I N-- HOUSE VALI DATI ON HOUSE VALI DATI ON 11-- BACKGROUND BACKGROUND 11 BACKGROUND BACKGROUND DIRECTIVE 2000/60/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF DIRECTIVE 2000/60/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL THE COUNCIL THE COUNCIL THE COUNCIL of 23 October 2000 of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of establishing a framework for Community action in the field of g y g y water policy water policy DIRECTIVE 2008/105/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 16 December 2008 on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy, amending and subsequently repealing Council Directives 82/176/EEC, 83/513/EEC, 84/156/EEC, 84/491/EEC, 86/280/EEC and amending Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament d f th C il and of the Council 11-- BACKGROUND BACKGROUND Directive 2000/60/EC Directive 2000/60/EC (1) Water is not a commercial product (it must be) (1) Water is not a commercial product (it must be) protected, defended and treated as such. protected, defended and treated as such. (22) Thi Di ti i t t ib t t th i (22) Thi Di ti i t t ib t t th i (22) This Directive is to contribute to the progressive (22) This Directive is to contribute to the progressive reduction of emissions of hazardous substances to reduction of emissions of hazardous substances to water. water. (27) The ultimate aim of this Directive is the (27) The ultimate aim of this Directive is the elimination of priority hazardous substances and elimination of priority hazardous substances and t ti i th i i t t ti i th i i t concentrations in the marine environment near concentrations in the marine environment near background values for naturally occurring background values for naturally occurring substances. substances. (45) Member States should adopt measures to (45) Member States should adopt measures to eliminate pollution of surface water by the priority eliminate pollution of surface water by the priority b t d i l t d ll ti b b t d i l t d ll ti b substances and progressively to reduce pollution by substances and progressively to reduce pollution by other substances other substances DIRECTIVE 2008/105/EC DIRECTIVE 2008/105/EC SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY 11 BACKGROUND BACKGROUND 1. 1. BACKGROUND BACKGROUND 2. 2. CHARACTERS OF THE METHODS RECOMMENDED BY CHARACTERS OF THE METHODS RECOMMENDED BY THE EC DI RECTI VE THE EC DI RECTI VE 33 AVAI LABLE TECHNI QUES FOR METALS AVAI LABLE TECHNI QUES FOR METALS 3. 3. AVAI LABLE TECHNI QUES FOR METALS AVAI LABLE TECHNI QUES FOR METALS 4. 4. I CP I CP- - MS MS a. Definition a. Definition b P & C b P & C b. Pros & Cons b. Pros & Cons 5. 5. THE I SO 17294 THE I SO 17294-- 2 METHOD FOR THE ANALYSI S OF 2 METHOD FOR THE ANALYSI S OF METALS METALS 66 THE ADOPTED METHOD AND I TS I N THE ADOPTED METHOD AND I TS I N HOUSE HOUSE 6. 6. THE ADOPTED METHOD AND I TS I N THE ADOPTED METHOD AND I TS I N-- HOUSE HOUSE VALI DATI ON VALI DATI ON 7. 7. UNCERTAI NTY OF MEASURE UNCERTAI NTY OF MEASURE 88 EXTENTI ON FROM I NLAND WATERS TO EXTENTI ON FROM I NLAND WATERS TO 8. 8. EXTENTI ON FROM I NLAND WATERS TO EXTENTI ON FROM I NLAND WATERS TO TRANSI TI ONAL AND SEA TRANSI TI ONAL AND SEA-- WATERs WATERs 9. 9. MERCURY AS AN EXAMPLE OF PARTI CULARLY MERCURY AS AN EXAMPLE OF PARTI CULARLY COMPLEX I N COMPLEX I N HOUSE VALI DATI ON HOUSE VALI DATI ON COMPLEX I N COMPLEX I N-- HOUSE VALI DATI ON HOUSE VALI DATI ON CHARACTERS OF THE METHODS CHARACTERS OF THE METHODS RECOMMENDED BY THE EC DIRECTIVE RECOMMENDED BY THE EC DIRECTIVE RECOMMENDED BY THE EC DIRECTIVE RECOMMENDED BY THE EC DIRECTIVE WFD WFD requirements for analytical methods requirements for analytical methods Annex V, paragraph 1.3.6 Annex V, paragraph 1.3.6 the provision of chemical data by Member the provision of chemical data by Member St t h ll b d b l ti l St t h ll b d b l ti l States shall be ensured by analytical States shall be ensured by analytical methods methods that conform to relevant international or that conform to relevant international or that conform to relevant international or that conform to relevant international or national standards or to other national or national standards or to other national or international standards international standards international standards international standards or alternatively by analytical methods that or alternatively by analytical methods that are not standardized but provide data of are not standardized but provide data of pp equivalent or better scientific quality and equivalent or better scientific quality and comparability than standard analytical comparability than standard analytical th d th d methods methods Requirements from QA/QC COM Requirements from QA/QC COM Li it f tifi ti ( Li it f tifi ti (LOQ LOQ) l b l ) l b l decision decision Limit of quantification ( Limit of quantification (LOQ LOQ) equal or below ) equal or below 30% 30%of the relevant Environmental Quality of the relevant Environmental Quality Standards ( Standards (EQS EQS)) Sta da ds ( Sta da ds ( QS QS)) LOQ versus Lower Limit of LOQ versus Lower Limit of Application( Application(LLOA LLOA) ) LOQ LOQ = lab specific performance value = lab specific performance value LLOA LLOA = method specific performance value = method specific performance value Relative Target Uncertainty of 50% Relative Target Uncertainty of 50% Relative Target Uncertainty of 50% Relative Target Uncertainty of 50% measured at the level of the relevant measured at the level of the relevant EQS EQS Validation Validation according to according to EN ISO/IEC 17025 EN ISO/IEC 17025 gg // METALS: AVAILABLE METALS: AVAILABLE TECHNIQUES TECHNIQUES GFAAS GFAAS FAAS FAAS HGAAS HGAAS ICP ICP OES OES ICP ICP--OES OES CC SS COMPARISON OF ICP COMPARISON OF ICP- -MS TO MS TO OTHER TECHNIQUES OTHER TECHNIQUES Shares applications with ICP Shares applications with ICP- -OES and AAS OES and AAS Shares multielement characteristic with Shares multielement characteristic with ICP ICP--OES OES Shares analytical speed with ICP Shares analytical speed with ICP--OES OES Shares analytical speed with ICP Shares analytical speed with ICP OES OES Shares detection limits with GFAAS Shares detection limits with GFAAS Unique in isotope measurement capability Unique in isotope measurement capability Unique in isotope measurement capability Unique in isotope measurement capability Unique in rapid semiquantitative analysis Unique in rapid semiquantitative analysis SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY 11 BACKGROUND BACKGROUND 1. 1. BACKGROUND BACKGROUND 2. 2. CHARACTERS OF THE METHODS RECOMMENDED BY CHARACTERS OF THE METHODS RECOMMENDED BY THE EC DI RECTI VE THE EC DI RECTI VE 33 AVAI LABLE TECHNI QUES FOR METALS AVAI LABLE TECHNI QUES FOR METALS 3. 3. AVAI LABLE TECHNI QUES FOR METALS AVAI LABLE TECHNI QUES FOR METALS 4. 4. I CP I CP- - MS MS a. Definition a. Definition b P & C b P & C b. Pros & Cons b. Pros & Cons 5. 5. THE I SO 17294 THE I SO 17294-- 2 METHOD FOR THE ANALYSI S OF 2 METHOD FOR THE ANALYSI S OF METALS METALS 66 THE ADOPTED METHOD AND I TS I N THE ADOPTED METHOD AND I TS I N HOUSE HOUSE 6. 6. THE ADOPTED METHOD AND I TS I N THE ADOPTED METHOD AND I TS I N-- HOUSE HOUSE VALI DATI ON VALI DATI ON 7. 7. UNCERTAI NTY OF MEASURE UNCERTAI NTY OF MEASURE 88 EXTENTI ON FROM I NLAND WATERS TO EXTENTI ON FROM I NLAND WATERS TO 8. 8. EXTENTI ON FROM I NLAND WATERS TO EXTENTI ON FROM I NLAND WATERS TO TRANSI TI ONAL AND SEA TRANSI TI ONAL AND SEA-- WATERs WATERs 9. 9. MERCURY AS AN EXAMPLE OF PARTI CULARLY MERCURY AS AN EXAMPLE OF PARTI CULARLY COMPLEX I N COMPLEX I N HOUSE VALI DATI ON HOUSE VALI DATI ON COMPLEX I N COMPLEX I N-- HOUSE VALI DATI ON HOUSE VALI DATI ON ICP ICP- -MS (Inductively Coupled MS (Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry) Plasma Mass Spectrometry) -- An analytical technique to An analytical technique to determine determine Elements Elements using using Mass Mass determine determine Elements Elements using using Mass Mass Spectrometry Spectrometry from from Ions Ions generated by an generated by an Inductively Inductively Coupled Plasma Coupled Plasma -- Mass spectroscopy Mass spectroscopy- - Separation Separation and and measurement measurement of the mass of of the mass of individual atoms making up a individual atoms making up a given material given material given material given material ICP-Torch Mass Spectrometer Quadrupole Nebulizer Q p Interface Ionization Process in Plasma Ionization Process in Plasma Ionization Process in Plasma Ionization Process in Plasma M t l t i i d (90%) M t l t i i d (90%) Most elements are ionized (90%) Most elements are ionized (90%) Most elements form a M Most elements form a M + + (single ionization) (single ionization) ICP ICP- -MS (Inductively Coupled MS (Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry) Plasma Mass Spectrometry) PRO PRO PROs PROs Rapid multi Rapid multi--element element quantitative analysis quantitative analysis CONs CONs Isobaric Spectral Overlaps Isobaric Spectral Overlaps Mole la O e laps Mole la O e laps q y q y Very low detection limit Very low detection limit Wide dynamic range Wide dynamic range Molecular Overlaps Molecular Overlaps Not suitable for samples Not suitable for samples with salt content > 0.3% with salt content > 0.3% Isotopes analysis Isotopes analysis allowed allowed with salt content > 0.3% with salt content > 0.3% 40 50 60 60 70 80 90 Pb Cr 20 30 40 20 30 40 50 0 10 204 206 207 208 0 10 20 50 52 53 54 PROs PROs-- Detection Limits Detection Limits PROs PROs Detection Limits Detection Limits Most below 10 ppt Most below 10 ppt Most elements 10 X better than GF Most elements 10 X better than GF--AAS AAS Most elements 10 X better than GF Most elements 10 X better than GF AAS AAS Most elements less than 0.01 ug/L: Most elements less than 0.01 ug/L: < 10 ng/L Al, As, Hg, Mg, Ti < 10 ng/L Al, As, Hg, Mg, Ti < 5 ng/L Ag, Au, Ba, Cd, Cu, Co, Mn, Mo, Sn, Sb, Pb, < 5 ng/L Ag, Au, Ba, Cd, Cu, Co, Mn, Mo, Sn, Sb, Pb, Pt Pt < 1 ng/L all rare earth elements, Uranium and Thorium < 1 ng/L all rare earth elements, Uranium and Thorium Even halogens have useful detection limits: Even halogens have useful detection limits: I I 0.01 ug/L 0.01 ug/L Br Br 0 2 ug/L 0 2 ug/L Br Br 0.2 ug/L 0.2 ug/L Cl Cl 10 ug/L 10 ug/L CONs CONs-- Molecular Overlaps Molecular Overlaps CONs CONs Molecular Overlaps Molecular Overlaps The chemical and physical conditions existing in the The chemical and physical conditions existing in the plasma and interface region may allow the formation of plasma and interface region may allow the formation of l i l l i i O CO l i l l i i O CO polyatomic, or molecular ions. i.e. OH, CO, ArH polyatomic, or molecular ions. i.e. OH, CO, ArH The mass spectrum produced by introducing aqueous The mass spectrum produced by introducing aqueous solutions into the plasma include masses originating from solutions into the plasma include masses originating from p g g p g g the solvent and any associated impurities i.e. SO, ArCl, the solvent and any associated impurities i.e. SO, ArCl, ClO ClO Background spectral features have been well Background spectral features have been well g p g p characterized characterized (Tan & Horlick (Tan & Horlick --Appl. Spectroscopy, 40, 445 Appl. Spectroscopy, 40, 445- -1986) 1986) Cl 35 O 16 vs. V 51 and and Cl 37 O 16 vs. Cr 53 Isobaric Interferences Isobaric Interferences Due to isotopes shared among different elements Nichel Iron Isotope Abundance 58 68 % Isotope Abundance 54 6 % 60 26 % 61 1 % 56 92 % 57 2 % 62 4 % 64 1 % 58 0,3 % Th il d th h ti ti 18 They are easily removed through correction equation Ni58(correct)= Ni58- 0.1429 * Fe57 Molecular Interferences in ICP- MS Most difficult elements: Interferent Element Isotope Ion Calcium 40 Ca 40 Ar + Vanadium 51 V 16 O 35 Cl + Chromium 52 Cr 40 Ar 12 C + Iron 56 Fe 40 Ar 16 O + 40 Ca 16 O + Iron 56 Fe 40 Ar 16 O + , 40 Ca 16 O + Arsenic 75 As 40 Ar 35 Cl + Selenium 78 Se 40 Ar 38 Ar + Selenium Se Ar Ar Typical Polyatomic Interference Typical Polyatomic Interference Typical Polyatomic Interference Typical Polyatomic Interference SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY 11 BACKGROUND BACKGROUND 1. 1. BACKGROUND BACKGROUND 2. 2. CHARACTERS OF THE METHODS RECOMMENDED BY CHARACTERS OF THE METHODS RECOMMENDED BY THE EC DI RECTI VE THE EC DI RECTI VE 33 AVAI LABLE TECHNI QUES FOR METALS AVAI LABLE TECHNI QUES FOR METALS 3. 3. AVAI LABLE TECHNI QUES FOR METALS AVAI LABLE TECHNI QUES FOR METALS 4. 4. I CP I CP- - MS MS a. Definition a. Definition b P & C b P & C b. Pros & Cons b. Pros & Cons 5. 5. THE I SO 17294 THE I SO 17294-- 2 METHOD FOR THE ANALYSI S OF 2 METHOD FOR THE ANALYSI S OF METALS METALS 66 THE ADOPTED METHOD AND I TS I N THE ADOPTED METHOD AND I TS I N HOUSE HOUSE 6. 6. THE ADOPTED METHOD AND I TS I N THE ADOPTED METHOD AND I TS I N-- HOUSE HOUSE VALI DATI ON VALI DATI ON 7. 7. UNCERTAI NTY OF MEASURE UNCERTAI NTY OF MEASURE 88 EXTENTI ON FROM I NLAND WATERS TO EXTENTI ON FROM I NLAND WATERS TO 8. 8. EXTENTI ON FROM I NLAND WATERS TO EXTENTI ON FROM I NLAND WATERS TO TRANSI TI ONAL AND SEA TRANSI TI ONAL AND SEA-- WATERs WATERs 9. 9. MERCURY AS AN EXAMPLE OF PARTI CULARLY MERCURY AS AN EXAMPLE OF PARTI CULARLY COMPLEX I N COMPLEX I N HOUSE VALI DATI ON HOUSE VALI DATI ON COMPLEX I N COMPLEX I N-- HOUSE VALI DATI ON HOUSE VALI DATI ON EN EN ISO 17294 ISO 17294 2 METHOD 2 METHOD EN EN-- ISO 17294 ISO 17294--2 METHOD 2 METHOD EN ISO 17294 EN ISO 17294 2:2005 2:2005 EN ISO 17294 EN ISO 17294--2:2005 2:2005 Metals on water Metals on water Determination of 62 elements in water by ICP Determination of 62 elements in water by ICP--MS MS Thi th d h b li d t th d t i ti f Al A B Cd Thi th d h b li d t th d t i ti f Al A B Cd This method has been applied to the determination of: Al, As, B, Cd, This method has been applied to the determination of: Al, As, B, Cd, Cr, Cu, , Hg, Mn, Ni, Pb, Sb, Se and Zn. Cr, Cu, , Hg, Mn, Ni, Pb, Sb, Se and Zn. The sample is filtered thruogh a 0.45m filter and the liquid phase is The sample is filtered thruogh a 0.45m filter and the liquid phase is acidified with nitric acid acidified with nitric acid acidified with nitric acid acidified with nitric acid All these metals are determined with the ICP All these metals are determined with the ICP--MS technique MS technique The content of the indicated metals in water samples is determined with The content of the indicated metals in water samples is determined with ICP ICP MS MS ICP ICP--MS. MS. The sample, in case diluted, is sucked up with a peristaltic pump, The sample, in case diluted, is sucked up with a peristaltic pump, nebulized and ionized with the plasma (the most of elements is nebulized and ionized with the plasma (the most of elements is ionized at the 90% level) ionized at the 90% level) ionized at the 90% level). ionized at the 90% level). The formed ionic stream is filtered with a quadrupole, which selects the The formed ionic stream is filtered with a quadrupole, which selects the mass to be analyzed, and measured by the detector. The use of the mass to be analyzed, and measured by the detector. The use of the internal standard is necessary to compensate drift effects of the tool internal standard is necessary to compensate drift effects of the tool y p y p and effects of suppression of the signal related to the matrix. and effects of suppression of the signal related to the matrix. For waters is used as internal standard the Rh. For waters is used as internal standard the Rh. MW080.1CVE In MW080.1CVE In--house method house method (determination of 30 metals in drinking,ground, and surface fresh (determination of 30 metals in drinking,ground, and surface fresh waters and medium salt waters) waters and medium salt waters) In In- -House Application of ISO 17294 House Application of ISO 17294- -2:2005 2:2005 Characteristics: Characteristics: A. A. Selection of 30 out of 62 elements Selection of 30 out of 62 elements BB Selection of a restricted spectrum of Selection of a restricted spectrum of B. B. Selection of a restricted spectrum of Selection of a restricted spectrum of isotopes to grant lower detection limits isotopes to grant lower detection limits Diff t d t i ti f LOQ (l Diff t d t i ti f LOQ (l C. C. Different determination of LOQ (lower Different determination of LOQ (lower quantification limit) in order to meet the quantification limit) in order to meet the t i l t t ti f i l d t i l t t ti f i l d matrix element concentration of inland matrix element concentration of inland waters in the area waters in the area (A) and (B): Monitored Isotopes (A) and (B): Monitored Isotopes d C ti E ti d C ti E ti and Correction Equations and Correction Equations (C): Solutions for Interference (C): Solutions for Interference Control Control The presence and rate of molecular interference is determined by The presence and rate of molecular interference is determined by The presence and rate of molecular interference is determined by The presence and rate of molecular interference is determined by the composition of the matrix, and, in turn, affects LOQ the composition of the matrix, and, in turn, affects LOQ For this reason, the solutions for LOQ determination have been For this reason, the solutions for LOQ determination have been prepared in order to mirror the matrix element concentration of prepared in order to mirror the matrix element concentration of p p p p drinking water drinking water (ICS_POT (ICS_POT) and of inland water ( ) and of inland water (ICS ICS- -SUP SUP) in the ) in the area area Interferents VALIDATION ACCORDING TO VALIDATION ACCORDING TO EN ISO/IEC EN ISO/IEC 17025 17025 Selectivity Selectivity Power to Power to distinguish distinguish the analyte from interfering the analyte from interfering species species Trueness Trueness Closeness of agreement Closeness of agreement between the average value between the average value Trueness Trueness Closeness of agreement Closeness of agreement between the average value between the average value and an accepted reference value and an accepted reference value Recovery Recovery Power to Power to detect a known quantity detect a known quantity of the analyte of the analyte dd d t th t i dd d t th t i added to the matrix added to the matrix Repeatability Repeatability Precision Precision under under repeatability repeatability conditions conditions (same (same method, equipment, operator, short interval of time) method, equipment, operator, short interval of time) Reproducibility Reproducibility Precision Precision under under reproducibility conditions reproducibility conditions (same (same method, different equipment, operator) method, different equipment, operator) Reproducibility Reproducibility 95% Absolute difference between two single test 95% Absolute difference between two single test Reproducibility Reproducibility limit limit 95% Absolute difference between two single test 95% Absolute difference between two single test results obtained under reproducibility conditions results obtained under reproducibility conditions R.L. R.L. LOD LOD Smallest quantity Smallest quantity of analyte that can be of analyte that can be detected detected LOD LOD Smallest quantity Smallest quantity of analyte that can be of analyte that can be detected detected LOQ LOQ Smallest quantity Smallest quantity of analited that can be of analited that can be measured measured i i i i RR i hi hi h h h d i i hi hi h h h d i li li Linearity range Linearity range Range Range within which the method is within which the method is linear linear Application range Application range Range Range within which the method is within which the method is applicable applicable In house validation In-house validation Parameter Acceptability criterion a a p ab y o Selectivity Interferences < LOQ Trueness t 2 Recovery 80 120 % Repeatability CV < 10 % Reproducibility In the range 1- 10 g/l: Al, B, Zn: CV < 30% Others: CV < 20% Others: CV < 20% Repeatability limit % max following readings < r% LOD <1/5 limit fixed by National Regulations LOD <1/5 limit fixed by National Regulations LOQ < limit fixed by National Regulations Linearity range Within application range y g Within application range Application range Suitable to concentration typical of drinking and inland water In In--house validation: selectivity & house validation: selectivity & LOQ LOQ The selectivity of the method was evaluated studying The selectivity of the method was evaluated studying the effect which main possible inteferents can exert the effect which main possible inteferents can exert the effect which main possible inteferents can exert the effect which main possible inteferents can exert on the analytes we are looking for ( on the analytes we are looking for (false positive false positive). ). LOQs are determined experimentally according to LOQs are determined experimentally according to l i l i regulations regulations Interferents Inhouse validation: Trueness, recovery, repeatability, reproducibility All thi t h b 1. All this parameters have been determined with test realized upon certified materials: certified materials: TM-15 fortified water NWRI TM 27 2 f tifi d t NWRI TM-27.2 fortified water NWRI These materials have two different levels f l t t ti t i th of analyte concentration to mirror the levels most commonly found in our samples samples 2. Trueness has furthermore been validated with partecipation to interlaboratory with partecipation to interlaboratory Proficiency Tests PROFICIENCY TEST PROFICIENCY TEST 2 PROFICIENCY TEST-2 In-house validation: LOD, LOQ, linearity range LOD h been dete mined n l ing ol tion LOD has been determined analyzing a solution fortified with concentration similar to predicted LOD LOD LOQ has been determined as three times the standard deviation of 10 measures obtained analyzing two solutions of interferents ICS- POT (drinking water) and ICS-SUP (inland water) water) The verification of linearity range has been carried out by means of a linear regression carried out by means of a linear regression using different standards at known concentrations EXPERIMENTAL LOQs AS DETERMINED AFTER VALIDATION (FRESH WATERS AFTER VALIDATION (FRESH WATERS AND MEDIUM SALT WATERS) Analyte LOQ (g/l) Analyte LOQ (g/l) Al 1.0 As 1.0 Hg 0.05 (CV-ICPMS) Mn 0.5 B 5.0 Be 0.5 Mo 0.5 Ni 1.0 Cd 0.2 Co 0.5 Pb 0.5 Sb 1.0 S 5 0 Cr 1.0 Cu 1 0 Se 5.0 Tl 0.5 V 1 0 Cu 1.0 V 1.0 Zn 1.0 SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY 11 BACKGROUND BACKGROUND 1. 1. BACKGROUND BACKGROUND 2. 2. CHARACTERS OF THE METHODS RECOMMENDED BY CHARACTERS OF THE METHODS RECOMMENDED BY THE EC DI RECTI VE THE EC DI RECTI VE 33 AVAI LABLE TECHNI QUES FOR METALS AVAI LABLE TECHNI QUES FOR METALS 3. 3. AVAI LABLE TECHNI QUES FOR METALS AVAI LABLE TECHNI QUES FOR METALS 4. 4. I CP I CP- - MS MS a. Definition a. Definition b P & C b P & C b. Pros & Cons b. Pros & Cons 5. 5. THE I SO 17294 THE I SO 17294-- 2 METHOD FOR THE ANALYSI S OF 2 METHOD FOR THE ANALYSI S OF METALS METALS 66 THE ADOPTED METHOD AND I TS I N THE ADOPTED METHOD AND I TS I N HOUSE HOUSE 6. 6. THE ADOPTED METHOD AND I TS I N THE ADOPTED METHOD AND I TS I N-- HOUSE HOUSE VALI DATI ON VALI DATI ON 7. 7. UNCERTAI NTY OF MEASURE UNCERTAI NTY OF MEASURE 88 EXTENTI ON FROM I NLAND WATERS TO EXTENTI ON FROM I NLAND WATERS TO 8. 8. EXTENTI ON FROM I NLAND WATERS TO EXTENTI ON FROM I NLAND WATERS TO TRANSI TI ONAL AND SEA TRANSI TI ONAL AND SEA-- WATERs WATERs 9. 9. MERCURY AS AN EXAMPLE OF PARTI CULARLY MERCURY AS AN EXAMPLE OF PARTI CULARLY COMPLEX I N COMPLEX I N HOUSE VALI DATI ON HOUSE VALI DATI ON COMPLEX I N COMPLEX I N-- HOUSE VALI DATI ON HOUSE VALI DATI ON UNCERTAINTY UNCERTAINTY (VIM 3.9, UNI ENV 13005, B.2.18) Parameter, associated to the results of a measure, which quantify the dispersion of values reasonably attributable to the analyte being measured the analyte being measured. To calculate the measurement uncertainty the top-down(*) approach has been applied, repeating tests on CRM (TM-15 NWRI; TM-27.2 NWRI), obtaining the standard deviation and comparing them with the method g p g ISO-17294 precision data and applying the f-test (*) http://www.eurolab.org/docs/technical%20report/Technical_Report_Measur ement_Uncertainty_2007.pdf UNCERTAINTY Isotope CRM Extended Uncertainty (M=1) Extended Uncertainty (M=2) g/l g/l % g/l % Al 27 NWRI TM 27 2 14 5 3 92 27 2 79 19 UNCERTAINTY Al 27 NWRI TM-27-2 14,5 3,92 27 2,79 19 NWRI TM-15 21,7 6,5 30 4,62 21 As 75 NWRI TM-27-2 2,4 0,27 11 0,20 8 NWRI TM-15 14 6 1 93 13 1 38 9 NWRI TM-15 14,6 1,93 13 1,38 9 Cd 114 NWRI TM-27-2 1,2 0,14 12 0,10 9 NWRI TM-15 13,2 0,57 4 0,41 3 Mn 55 NWRI TM-27-2 2,6 0,30 12 0,22 8 Mn 55 NWRI TM 27 2 2,6 0,30 12 0,22 8 NWRI TM-15 18,4 2,48 13 1,76 10 Ni 58 NWRI TM-27-2 2,6 0,71 27 0,51 19 NWRI TM-15 18,1 2,33 13 1,65 9 Ni 60 NWRI TM-27-2 2,6 0,72 28 0,52 20 NWRI TM-15 18,1 2,36 13 1,67 9 Pb 206 NWRI TM-27-2 3,2 0,66 21 0,47 15 NWRI TM-15 11,8 2,11 18 1,50 13 Pb 207 NWRI TM-27-2 3,2 0,61 19 0,43 14 NWRI TM-15 11,8 1,64 14 1,17 10 Pb Sum NWRI TM-27-2 3,2 0,65 20 0,46 14 NWRI TM-15 11,8 1,84 16 1,31 11 V 51 NWRI TM-27-2 2,4 0,48 20 0,34 14 NWRI TM-15 12,4 2,33 19 1,65 13 Zn 66 NWRI TM-27-2 14,1 2,63 19 1,89 13 NWRI TM-15 32 4,83 15 3,45 11 SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY 11 BACKGROUND BACKGROUND 1. 1. BACKGROUND BACKGROUND 2. 2. CHARACTERS OF THE METHODS RECOMMENDED BY CHARACTERS OF THE METHODS RECOMMENDED BY THE EC DI RECTI VE THE EC DI RECTI VE 33 AVAI LABLE TECHNI QUES FOR METALS AVAI LABLE TECHNI QUES FOR METALS 3. 3. AVAI LABLE TECHNI QUES FOR METALS AVAI LABLE TECHNI QUES FOR METALS 4. 4. I CP I CP- - MS MS a. Definition a. Definition b P & C b P & C b. Pros & Cons b. Pros & Cons 5. 5. THE I SO 17294 THE I SO 17294-- 2 METHOD FOR THE ANALYSI S OF 2 METHOD FOR THE ANALYSI S OF METALS METALS 66 THE ADOPTED METHOD AND I TS I N THE ADOPTED METHOD AND I TS I N HOUSE HOUSE 6. 6. THE ADOPTED METHOD AND I TS I N THE ADOPTED METHOD AND I TS I N-- HOUSE HOUSE VALI DATI ON VALI DATI ON 7. 7. UNCERTAI NTY OF MEASURE UNCERTAI NTY OF MEASURE 88 EXTENTI ON FROM I NLAND WATERS TO EXTENTI ON FROM I NLAND WATERS TO 8. 8. EXTENTI ON FROM I NLAND WATERS TO EXTENTI ON FROM I NLAND WATERS TO TRANSI TI ONAL AND SEA TRANSI TI ONAL AND SEA-- WATERs WATERs 9. 9. MERCURY AS AN EXAMPLE OF PARTI CULARLY MERCURY AS AN EXAMPLE OF PARTI CULARLY COMPLEX I N COMPLEX I N HOUSE VALI DATI ON HOUSE VALI DATI ON COMPLEX I N COMPLEX I N-- HOUSE VALI DATI ON HOUSE VALI DATI ON EXTENTION FROM INLAND TO EXTENTION FROM INLAND TO TRANSITIONAL AND SEA TRANSITIONAL AND SEA-- WATERs WATERs THE DESCRIBED INSTRUMENTS & METHODS THE DESCRIBED INSTRUMENTS & METHODS CANNOT BE USED FOR SEA-WATERS METHOD ISO-17294 NOT VALIDATED FOR METHOD ISO-17294 NOT VALIDATED FOR SEA-WATERS (ICP-MS NOT SUITABLE FOR SEA-WATER ANALYSIS)) THEREFORE OTHER INSTRUMENTS AND/OR METHODS SHOULD BE USED i i Matrix separation Analyte preconcentration High Resolution ICP-MS Collision/Reaction Cell ICP-MS (not suitable for Collision/Reaction Cell ICP MS (not suitable for Hg) EXTENTION FROM INLAND TO EXTENTION FROM INLAND TO TRANSITIONAL AND SEA TRANSITIONAL AND SEA WATER WATER TRANSITIONAL AND SEA TRANSITIONAL AND SEA-- WATERs WATERs Collision Reaction Interface (CRI) EXTENTION FROM INLAND TO EXTENTION FROM INLAND TO TRANSITIONAL AND SEA TRANSITIONAL AND SEA-- WATERs WATERs TO CARRY OUT THE A l t (& it AA EQS Oth TO CARRY OUT THE ANALYSIS, SEA-WATERS SHOULD BE DILUTED 10- Analyte (& its compounds) AA-EQS- Other surface waters FOLD LOQ 10-FOLD LOWER THEN METHOD g/L THEN, METHOD VALIDATION PROCESS IS TO BE RE-SHAPED (DIFFERENT METHOD Cd 0.2 Pb 7 2 (DIFFERENT METHOD, INSTRUMENT AND LIMITS) PROCESS CURRENTLY Pb 7.2 Ni 20 GOING ON (MeLA4-Project) Hg 0.05 EXTENTION FROM INLAND TO EXTENTION FROM INLAND TO TRANSITIONAL AND SEA TRANSITIONAL AND SEA WATERs WATERs TRANSITIONAL AND SEA TRANSITIONAL AND SEA-- WATERs WATERs EXTENTION FROM INLAND TO EXTENTION FROM INLAND TO TRANSITIONAL AND SEA TRANSITIONAL AND SEA WATER WATER TRANSITIONAL AND SEA TRANSITIONAL AND SEA-- WATERs WATERs SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY 11 BACKGROUND BACKGROUND 1. 1. BACKGROUND BACKGROUND 2. 2. CHARACTERS OF THE METHODS RECOMMENDED BY CHARACTERS OF THE METHODS RECOMMENDED BY THE EC DI RECTI VE THE EC DI RECTI VE 33 AVAI LABLE TECHNI QUES FOR METALS AVAI LABLE TECHNI QUES FOR METALS 3. 3. AVAI LABLE TECHNI QUES FOR METALS AVAI LABLE TECHNI QUES FOR METALS 4. 4. I CP I CP- - MS MS a. Definition a. Definition b P & C b P & C b. Pros & Cons b. Pros & Cons 5. 5. THE I SO 17294 THE I SO 17294-- 2 METHOD FOR THE ANALYSI S OF 2 METHOD FOR THE ANALYSI S OF METALS METALS 66 THE ADOPTED METHOD AND I TS I N THE ADOPTED METHOD AND I TS I N HOUSE HOUSE 6. 6. THE ADOPTED METHOD AND I TS I N THE ADOPTED METHOD AND I TS I N-- HOUSE HOUSE VALI DATI ON VALI DATI ON 7. 7. UNCERTAI NTY OF MEASURE UNCERTAI NTY OF MEASURE 88 EXTENTI ON FROM I NLAND WATERS TO EXTENTI ON FROM I NLAND WATERS TO 8. 8. EXTENTI ON FROM I NLAND WATERS TO EXTENTI ON FROM I NLAND WATERS TO TRANSI TI ONAL AND SEA TRANSI TI ONAL AND SEA-- WATERs WATERs 9. 9. MERCURY AS AN EXAMPLE OF PARTI CULARLY MERCURY AS AN EXAMPLE OF PARTI CULARLY COMPLEX I N COMPLEX I N HOUSE VALI DATI ON HOUSE VALI DATI ON COMPLEX I N COMPLEX I N-- HOUSE VALI DATI ON HOUSE VALI DATI ON DIRECTIVE 2008/105/EC DIRECTIVE 2008/105/EC MERCURY AS AN EXAMPLE OF A MERCURY AS AN EXAMPLE OF A PARTICULAR IN PARTICULAR IN--HOUSE VALIDATION HOUSE VALIDATION PARTICULAR IN PARTICULAR IN--HOUSE VALIDATION HOUSE VALIDATION Sea Sea--water contains water contains 30 30 g/L g/L of dissolved of dissolved g/ g/ solids solids- - Hg to be Hg to be measured= 1 x 10 measured= 1 x 10 --99 ((30 30 ng/L ng/L)) Available I t t t ((30 30 ng/L ng/L)) Instruments not sensible enough (FIA-CV) or not suitable for ot suitable for samples with samples with samples with samples with salt content > salt content > 0.3% 0.3% (ICP-MS) COLD VAPOR GENERATOR (CV) COUPLED WITH ICP MS COUPLED WITH ICP-MS METHOD VALIDATION ( ARPAV / PROCEDURE # PG01DL) SELECTIVITY Implied in Mass Spectrometry p p y SPECIFICITY Implied in Hydride Generator p y LINEARITY (Tested up to 500 ng/L) LOD (2 ng/L) LOD (2 ng/L) LOQ (10 ng/L) TRUENESS AND RECOVERY (tested with little TRUENESS AND RECOVERY (tested with little spike in matrix) REPEATABILITY (PRECISION) REPEATABILITY (PRECISION) Hg IN-HOUSE VALIDATION: REPEATABILITY (PRECISION) RESULTS Hg 200 Hg 202 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 Hg 200 Lineare (Hg 200) 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 Hg 202 Lineare (Hg 202) y = 77,916x + 607,74 0 500 1000 1500 2000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 II 608 / 608 / 789 / 789 / y = 100,69x + 795,63 0 1000 2000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Intercept = Intercept = 608 c/ s 608 c/ s 789 c/ s 789 c/ s Slope = Slope = 78 c x L/ s x ng 78 c x L/ s x ng 101 c x L/ s x ng 101 c x L/ s x ng RR 22 = = 0,9982 0,9982 R2 = 0,9982 R2 = 0,9982 FUTHER VALIDATION (COLLABORATIVE TRIAL) Results obtained with the described method (experimented Results obtained with the described method (experimented in Lab 3) from certified reference material (Hg in sea water) C C 9 0 0020 0 0002 / BCR- CRM 579 Hg= 0,0020 0.0002 g/L Twinning Contract BG 06 IB EN 01 Ministry of Environment & Water
(Grazie) G MMaria T Palonta aria T Palonta Regional Environmental Protection Agency- Veneto Region MMaria T. Palonta aria T. Palonta g g y g LABORATORY REGIONAL DEPARTMENT VENICE LABORATORY SERVICE VENICE LABORATORY SERVICE VENICE LABORATORY SERVICE VENICE LABORATORY SERVICE Simitli (BG)- 02/17-19, 2009