Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
%ake sure that you hoose only one independent $ariable to hange. Come people inad$ertently
hoose more than one.
I!. #ontro" of !ariab"es
3our must e5pliitly indiate how eah ontrolled $ariable identified in your $ariables setion was
ontrolled. If you an<t ati$ely ontrol a $ariable then your method should inlude a means of
monitoring it.
!. $ateria"s
In a (esign pratial you need to hoose the apparatus and submit an e"uipment re"uest. %ake sure you
plan thoroughly and don<t lea$e anything out. If you need something e5tra that you didn<t put on your
list it will be pro$ided but you will reei$e a partial for the first aspet of this riterion. The same thing
applies if you =borrow? from another group. ;f ourse if you try and persist with what you ha$e but I
an see that it<s learly not enough4 well that<s a partial too.
%ake sure when writing up your e"uipment list that you inlude!
D The siAes of glassware suh as beakers4 flasks4 et.
D The onentration of hemials )eg hydrohlori aid4 2.9 %*.
D The amounts of hemials )eg magnesium4 9..9 g*.
D The range of a thermometer )eg E29F, to 129F,*
D The amount of eah solution )eg 299 mL*
!I. $ethod
3ou will write your own method4 I won<t supply one for you to =opy?. Use =impersonal language?G
whih means no words suh as =I?4 =we?4 =they?4 =you? et.
/g! =I weighed out 9..9 g of magnesium and then I added 2.9 m' of 2% hydrohlori aid?
should be rewritten as =1dd 9.. g magnesium to 299 m' of 2% hydrohlori aid?
%ake sure you reord the amounts of materials to a suffiient preision in your method.
/g! If you weighed 29 g of magnesium using a $olumetri pipette this should be reorded as 29.99 g
and not Bust 29 g.
6hy7 Because the scale has a precision of two decimal points
6hile writing up your method in =dot point? or numbered form is aeptable4 real sientists atually
write their methods in paragraph form E try it.
3our method must e5pliitly indiate how eah ontrolled $ariable identified in your $ariables setion
was ontrolled. If you an<t ati$ely ontrol a $ariable then your method should inlude a means of
monitoring it.
Cometimes the best thing to do for your method is to draw a diagram of the e5perimental set up and
refer to it. That<s fine if you do a diagram that is of a suitable siAe and reasonably detailed. (on<t sketh
some doodle on the bak of your report two minutes before you<re about to hand it in. Helow on the left
is a poor e5ample of a diagram. ;n the right is a $ersion of the same e"uipment done well using a basi
drawing program.
Truly4 I wish I had a dollar for e$ery report where I<$e seen!
=1. Cet up the e"uipment as shown below!?
only to see below a big blank spae. If you intend to draw in a diagram make sure you don<t lea$e it
to the last minute and forget. I<m sure this happens beause people write up at home4 bring it to
shool and two minutes before its due to be handed up print it off in a pani. Io doubt this is also
the ause of many of the sloppy diagrams referred to in the pre$ious point. 1 missing diagram will
mean an automati partial on the seond aspet.
6hen designing a method ensure that you hange the independent $ariable enough times to ollet
enough points for a reasonable line of best fit. 1 minimum of fi%e data points is re"uired for any graph
and more should be olleted if time and materials allow.
,onsider whether or not the graph needs many data points or whether more repeating would be more
worthwhile. If the graph has a omple5 shape e.g. a titration or ooling ur$e4 then the more points the
better. If the graph is linear then repeating the e5periment for eah point would be a better way to
impro$e the orrelation oeffiient than simply olleting more points )assuming you already ha$e J E
19 points*.
The method should inlude suffiient repeats of trials to ensure that random errors are at least
minimised. (on<t lea$e this for your e$aluation as repeating the e5periment is a pretty lame suggestion
E doubly so if you should ha$e had it in your method in the first plae.
B. Data co""ection and processing
I. Data (Ra&)
There are se$eral aspets to data olletion. (on<t o$erlook any of the following!
D Kuantitati$e data )i.e. numerial $alues*
D Kualitati$e data )i.e. obser$ations*
D Unertainties in apparatus
It is $ery ommon for the seond of these to be forgotten E and that<s an automati partial!
(o not reord raw data on the task sheet thinking =I<ll write up the neat opy later?. If you hoose to
reord it =rough? on the bak of the task sheet it will be marked as your data olletion. Ideally you
should reord your data in a lab book dediated to that purpose. 3ou are permitted to then type it up
neatly for your report.
(on<t mi5 "uantitati$e and "ualitati$e data in the same olumn. Cometimes it is appropriate to reord
"ualitati$e data in a table and sometimes not. Usually it<s pretty lear when to do whih.
%ake sure you reord all of your +16 data. 1lthough4 raw data and proessed data ,1I be in the
same table4 but this would re"uire you head the setion as (1T1#+/CULTC
/g! If you are interested in the hange in temperature of a reation reord the
Initial and final temperature.
Initial Temp )F, L 9..F,*! 1J
8inal Temp )F, L 9..F,*! 4M
Temp ,hange )F, L 1.9F,*! '1
The temperature hange is a result of data proessing and annot be reorded as raw data.
II. 'ncertaint
The unertainty for a piee of apparatus is either printed on the apparatus )eg burette4 $olumetri
glassware* or is half the smallest measurable or ited $alue.
/g! If a balane an measure to two deimal plaes )9.91 g* then the error in a mass reading with
this balane is L9.99. g.
1n e5eption to the unertainty being half the smallest instrument $alue is when using a stopwath.
1ording to the display you an measure time to the nearest 199th of a seond )9.91 s* with our
stopwathes. Hased on this the unertainty would be L9.99. s E but somehow I doubt your refle5es are
this good. 1 more reasonable $alue would be L9.. seonds.
III. Data tab"e Presentation
6hen preparing your tables you must address the following to ensure you reei$e a complete for the
presentation aspet!
D The units must be inluded. They should be ited ;I,/ in brakets in eah olumn heading.
(on<t put the units after eah piee of data.
D The unertainty of the "uantitati$e data and the units of the unertainty need to be reorded one
in the olumn heading )see e5ample below*.
D 1ll data in a olumn must be gi$en to the same number of deimal plaes
D Tables and olumns need border
D The data in a olumn needs to be entered in the olumn.
D The table needs a suitable and desripti$e heading )=Table 1?4 =(ata ,olletion? or =+esults? are
not suitable headings*.
D (o not split tables o$er two pages if your table is not more than one page long.
Lea%ing an of the abo%e out &i"" resu"t in a partial for the third aspect.
INf there is something peuliar about a piee of data that you wish to draw the reader<s attention to4 put
an italiiAed supersripted letter after the data and make a note under the table.
1$oid repetition. 8or e5ample4 if in e$ery e5periment you used the same amount of aid Bust mention it
in the method. 3ou don<t need a olumn that repeats it o$er and o$er in your table.
Take great are with units. The most ommon mistake is to use mL when you should use m
'
.
IoOone likes ha$ing to hunt through tons of alulations to find final results4 least of all me. If the
results of repeated alulations aren<t tabulated to failitate omparison then a partial for presentation
will result.
III. Data Processing
The seond aspet is selfOe5planatory. The only ad$ie needed is to make sure you hek your working
arefully. If your data proessing gi$es you an answer that is nothing like what you e5peted4 or the
literature $alue)s* gi$en4 don<t blame the e5periment E you ha$e made a signifiant error in your data
proessing.
Chow the e"uations you used and an e5ample of a alulation.
If it is a simple alulation4 like an a$erage4 you only need to
show it one
(on<t use rounded off $alues in further alulations. ,arry
through all the deimal plaes on your alulator. Using
rounded off $alues an lead to final answers that are out by a
deimal plae or more. This will result in a partial for the first
aspet.
Use headings where possible to e5plain what setion or step of
the alulation you are doing.
If preparing your reports on a word proessor make sure you
subsript and supersript haraters where neessary.
I!. Graphs
If you use /5el for graphing!
D @lot a scatter x-y graph for ontinuous data.
D @lot a column graph for ategorial data.
D +emo$e gridlines and legend.
D 1dd a suitable trendline#line of best fit )in many ases you will ha$e to do this by hand*.
D (etermine the e"uation of the line )in trendline options*.
D (etermine the orrelation oeffiient )in trendline options*.
D If you an<t do all of the abo$e see me or do your graphs by hand!
8or /5el and handOdrawn graph
D -i$e your graph a suitable and desripti$e title )=-raph? is not a desripti$e title*.
D Label a5es and inlude units in brakets.
D /nsure your graph is a suitable siAe )half page* and not to narrow in either diretion.
If you lea$e any of the abo$e out a partial will be awarded for presentation.
(e%er) e%er) e%er *oin the dots. This will result in an automati not at all. The same thing applies if you
lea$e out the line of best fit entirely. 3ou must draw a line of best fit E a straight line or smooth ur$e
that has roughly as many points on either side of it.
Use a +HARP penil E if you don<t a partial will be awarded. 1 partial will also be awarded if your
graph is =hairy?.
IoOone likes ha$ing to hunt through tons of alulations to find final results4 least of all me. If the
results of repeated alulations aren<t tabulated to failitate omparison then a partial for presentation
will result.
Take are when interpreting graphs prepared with /5el. Hy default /5el will use your minimum and
ma5imum data points to selet where the a5es start and stop. 1t first glane the graph to the right seems
to ha$e a signifiant upward trend but with a lot of random error! ;ne might think that no reasonable
onlusion ould be reahed from suh unreliable data. 1ppearanes an be deei$ing. Hy double
liking on an a5is you an alter its properties inluding where it starts and stops. The data has been
plotted again with the yOa5is set to start at Aero. Iow a more logial onlusion an be reahed4
supported by the alulated gradient of the line and in agreement with aepted theoryE mass has no
effet on the rate of aeleration. %ind you4 the orrelation oeffiient is still4 at best4 only fair.
Cometimes you will want to do the opposite E aentuate the gradient by starting the yOa5is at a $alue
other than Aero.
#onc"usion
/nsure that you "uote any "uantitati$e results in your onlusion e$en if the "uantitati$e results are
mentioned elsewhere in your report. That said don<t Bust restate your results. (raw onlusions from
them.
+emember a hypothesis an only be supported or refuted. It cannot be ,pro%en-.
(on<t forget to ompare your results to the literature. This may be "uantitati$e literature $alues4
manufatures laims or established theories. If you are omparing "uantitati$e results e5press any
differene between your $alue and the literature $alue as a perentage of the literature $alue. Ctatements
suh as =our results were $ery lose to the literature $alues? are not enough E how lose are they as a
perentage7
,onlusions suh as =The results onfirm my hypothesis? will be awarded not a tall E espeially if the
results don<t =onfirm? your hypothesis and e$en if they do. 3ou must e5plain why#how your results
support or in$alidate your hypothesis. 3ou an do this by referring to speifi obser$ations4 the
gradients#shapes of graphs or $alues olleted#alulated. 3ou need to show that you understand how
your results support or in$alidate your hypothesis.
,onlusions suh as =The results onfirm my hypothesis? will be awarded not at all E espeially if the
results don<t =onfirm? your hypothesis and e$en if they do. 3ou must e5plain why#how your results
support or in$alidate your hypothesis. 3ou an do this by referring to speifi obser$ations4 the
gradients#shapes of graphs or $alues olleted#alulated. 3ou need to show that you understand how
your results support or in$alidate your hypothesis.
/%a"uation
i. /$aluating /rrors
1nalyse your soures of error. (istinguish between systemati and random errors.
+andom /rrors! ;ur randomly usually due to $ariation in biologial tissues.
Cystemati /rrors! ;ur eah time the e5periment is done beause some aspet of the e5periment has
a onsistent error. It may be that a measuring ylinder4 or thermometer is inaurate. Instead of the
thermometer reading 2.F, when it is 2.F, it reads 2:F,. Co all the temperatures you reord using
this thermometer will be 2F, out. This may ha$e a signifiant effet on any alulated $alues );r it
may not. ,onsider the signifiane of possible errors arefully*.
3our e$aluation of the errors should fous on the systemati and the random errors.
+ste2atic errors
Cystemati errors an be redued if e"uipment is regularly heked or alibrated to ensure that it is
funtioning orretly. 8or e5ample4 a thermometer should be plaed in an eletroni water bath to
hek that the thermostat of the water bath is orretly adBusted. 1 blank should be used to alibrate a
olorimeter to ompensate for the drift of the instrument.