0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
245 просмотров5 страниц
Competition Defined Competition Defined A social process that occurs when rewards are given to people for how their performance compares with others during the same task or when participating in the same event. Competition is a process that involves four distinct phases.
Competition Defined Competition Defined A social process that occurs when rewards are given to people for how their performance compares with others during the same task or when participating in the same event. Competition is a process that involves four distinct phases.
Competition Defined Competition Defined A social process that occurs when rewards are given to people for how their performance compares with others during the same task or when participating in the same event. Competition is a process that involves four distinct phases.
Competition and Cooperation Competition and Cooperation
Chapter 5 KIN 380 Psychological Analysis of Physical Activity After reading chapter After reading chapter 5 5 students will students will be able to: be able to: Understand the difference between competition and cooperation; Describe the process of competition; Detail the psychological studies of competition and cooperation; Discuss the social factors influencing competition and cooperation; Weinberg & Gould (2011, p. 103) After reading chapter After reading chapter 5 5 students will students will be able to: be able to: Explain the reasons competition can be either a bad or a good experience; Understand how to balance competitive and cooperative efforts; Weinberg & Gould (2011, p. 103) Competition Defined Competition Defined A social process that occurs when rewards are given to people for how their performance compares with the performances of others during the same task or when participating in the same event (Coakley, 1994) Cooperation Defined Cooperation Defined A social process through which performance is evaluated and rewarded in terms of the collective achievement of a group of people working together to reach a particular goal Coakley (1994) cited in Weinberg & Gould (2007, p. 104) Competition as a Process Competition as a Process Martens (1975) model competition is a process that involves four distinct phases. Objective Competitive Situation Objective Competitive Situation Subjective Competitive Situation Subjective Competitive Situation Response Response Cosequences Cosequences Weinberg & Gould (2007, p. 105) Nadal & Federer, 2009 2 Competition as a Process Competition as a Process Stage 1: Objective Competitive Stage 1: Objective Competitive Situation Situation situation in which performance is compared with some standard of excellence in the presence of at least one other person who is aware of the comparison. Weinberg & Gould (2007, p. 106) Competition as a Process Competition as a Process Stage 2: Subjective competitive Stage 2: Subjective competitive situation situation How the person perceives, accepts, and appraises the objective competitive situation (influenced by personality factors such as competitiveness) Weinberg & Gould (2007, p. 106) 8port Orientation 8port Orientation Ouestionnaire Ouestionnaire To provide a reliable and valid measure of competitiveness 3 types: 1. Competitiveness 2. Win Orientation 3. Goal Orientation Weinberg & Gould (2007, p. 107) Competition as a Process Competition as a Process Stage 3: Response Stage 3: Response Whether a person approaches or avoids an objective competitive situation (at the behavioral, physiological, and psychological levels) Weinberg & Gould (2007, p. 106) Competition as a Process Competition as a Process Stage 4: Consequences Stage 4: Consequences An evaluation (usually plus or minus) of ones response to the standards of the performance comparison Weinberg & Gould (2007, p. 106) Psychological 8tudies of Psychological 8tudies of Competition and Cooperation Competition and Cooperation Tripletts cyclists Tripletts cyclists Cyclists were faster in competition than when alone racing against the clock. Weinberg & Gould (2007, p. 110) 3 Psychological 8tudies of Psychological 8tudies of Competition and Cooperation Competition and Cooperation Deutschs puzzles Deutschs puzzles Competition Competition--group students were self group students were self-- centered, directed efforts at beating centered, directed efforts at beating others, had closed communication, and others, had closed communication, and exhibited group conflict and distrust. exhibited group conflict and distrust. Cooperation Cooperation--group students group students communicated communicated openly, shared information, developed friendships, and solved more puzzles. Weinberg & Gould (2007, pp. 110-111) Psychological 8tudies of Psychological 8tudies of Competition and Cooperation Competition and Cooperation Competition and aggression Competition and aggression Competition is not good or bad; it is neutral. Whether it leads to aggression or cooperation depends on the social environment and the way the performers view competition. Weinberg & Gould (2007, p. 110) Psychological 8tudies of Psychological 8tudies of Competition and Cooperation Competition and Cooperation Competition versus cooperation Competition versus cooperation and performance and performance Cooperation as opposed to competition produces superior performance, although results may depend on the nature of the task. Competition can serve as a positive source of motivation to improve and refine skills. Weinberg & Gould (2007, pp. 111-112) 8ix Attributes that Relate to 8ix Attributes that Relate to Both Competition and Both Competition and Cooperation {Garfield, 1986} Cooperation {Garfield, 1986} A sense of mission Strong work ethic Use of resources A strong preparation ethic A love of challenge and change Ability to work with a team Weinberg & Gould (2007, p. 106) Psychological 8tudies of Psychological 8tudies of Competition and Cooperation Competition and Cooperation Competitive sport and success in life Athletes in educational programs have Athletes in educational programs have higher educational aspirations than higher educational aspirations than nonathletes. nonathletes. Athletes have no more or less career Athletes have no more or less career success than nonathletes. success than nonathletes. Athletes are no more or less deviant than Athletes are no more or less deviant than nonathletes. nonathletes. Weinberg & Gould (2007, p. 114) 8port Participation will have a 8port Participation will have a positive effect if. positive effect if. Emphasis is placed on the following: a. Philosophy of non-violence b. Respect for self and others c. Importance of fitness and the control of self d. Confidence in physical skills e. A sense of responsibility Coakley (2007) 4 s Competition Good or Bad? s Competition Good or Bad? Competition is neither inherently good nor bad. It is neither productive nor destructive. It is a neutral process; the environment determines its effects to a great degree. Weinberg & Gould (2007, pp. 114- 115) Kids First Soccer Competitive vs. Cooperative Competitive vs. Cooperative Environments Environments Cooperative Cooperative environment environment Individual progress Effort Progress Part of Learning Challenge, personal best Personal progress, learning Developmental learning Dimension Dimension how success is defined What is valued How a person is evaluated How mistakes are viewed Why activity is engaged in What a person is focused on What the leader is focused on Competitive Competitive Environment Environment doing better than others Ability Scoring, winning Failure Extrinsic rewards, recognition Comparison to others Normative comparisons Enhancing Cooperation Enhancing Cooperation Component structure of games Competitive meanscompetitive ends. For example, King of the Mountain, 100- yard dash Cooperative meanscompetitive ends For example, soccer, basketball Weinberg & Gould (2007) Enhancing Cooperation Enhancing Cooperation Component structure of games Individual meansindividual ends For example, calisthenics, cross-country skiing Cooperative meansindividual ends For example, helping each other individually improve Cooperative meanscooperative ends For example, keeping a volleyball from hitting ground Weinberg & Gould (2007) Enhancing Cooperation Enhancing Cooperation Cooperative games Cooperative games are games that emphasize both cooperative means and cooperative ends. Cooperation can be taught through cooperative games. Cooperative games can be devised by changing the rules of traditional games. Weinberg & Gould (2007) Enhancing Cooperation Enhancing Cooperation General principles of cooperative games Maximize participation Maximize opportunities to learn sport and movement skills Do not keep score of game Weinberg & Gould (2007) 5 Enhancing Cooperation Enhancing Cooperation General principles of cooperative games Maximize opportunities for success Give positive feedback Provide opportunities for youngsters to play different positions Weinberg & Gould (2007) Balancing Cooperative Balancing Cooperative and Competitive Efforts and Competitive Efforts Guidelines for Competition and Cooperation Blend competition and cooperation when teaching and coaching physical skills. Individualize instruction to meet each persons needs. Structure games for children to include both competitive and cooperative elements. Weinberg & Gould (2007) Balancing Cooperative Balancing Cooperative and Competitive Efforts and Competitive Efforts Guidelines for Competition and Cooperation When competition leads to a fierce rivalry, use super ordinate goals to get the groups together. Provide positive feedback and encouragement to students and athletes regardless of the outcome of the competition. Weinberg & Gould (2007) Balancing Cooperative Balancing Cooperative and Competitive Efforts and Competitive Efforts Guidelines for Competition and Cooperation Stress cooperation to produce trust and open communication. Provide opportunities for both the learning of sport skills and the practice of these skills in competition. Weinberg & Gould (2007) Ouestions? Ouestions? Comments? Comments?