15

CHAPTER - 2
Literature Review

2.1. Introduction
An extensive review of the literature has been done on energy and exergy
analyses of different renewable energy systems in the present chapter. The literature
review on the exergoeconomics has also been done as one of the objectives of the
thesis is to evaluate the renewable energy systems on the basis of available
literature on exergoeconomic. The main idea was to get thrust and scant area of
exergy analysis of Renewable energy systems and have possible future direction of
research. The literature review has been classified as under:
a) Solar heating systems - It has been classified in two different categories as
below:
i. Solar air heater
ii. Solar water heater
b) Solar photovoltaic (SPV) systems
c) Renewable energy cooking devices - It has also been classified in two
different categories as below:
i. Solar cookers
ii. Biomass cook stoves
d) Exergoeconomics

2.2. Solar Heating Systems
This section deals with the literature survey on solar heating systems viz.
solar air heater and solar water heater for useful applications.

16

2.2.1. Solar Air Heater
For commercial applications, ability of the drier to process continuously is very
important to dry the end products for their safe storage to maintain the quality and
nutrient values of the product. Normally thermal storage systems are employed to
store thermal energy, which includes sensible heat storage, chemical energy storage
and latent heat storage. The solar drier is an energy efficient option in the drying
processes [1]. Use of forced convection solar driers seems to be an advantage
compared to traditional methods and improves the quality of the product
considerably [2-4]. The common sensible heat storage materials used to store
sensible heat are water, gravel bed, sand, clay, concrete, etc. for different
applications [3-6].
In recent years, few authors [7-13] have studied different feature of solar collector
systems using various approaches. For example, Kurtbas and Durmus [7] have
studied the solar air heater for different heating purposes whereas, Luminosua and
Farab [8] and Torres-Reyes et al, [9] have studied the optimal thermal energy
conversion and design of a flat plate solar collector using exergy analysis. On the
other hand, Bakos et al [10], Kaushik et al. [11], and Tyagi et al [12] have studied the
optimum design of a parabolic trough collector (PTC) and gave some fruitful results,
especially, the mass flow rate of the moving fluid and the concentration ratio of PTC
collector.

Ozturk and Demirel [13] experimentaly investigated the thermal performance of a
solar air heater having its flow channel packed with Raschig rings based on the
energy and exergy analyses. Average daily net energy and exergy efficiencies were
found to be 17.51 and 0.91%, respectively. Also, the energy and exergy efficiencies
17

of the packed-bed solar air heater increased as the outlet temperature of heat
transfer fluid increased. Potdukhe and Thombre [14] designed, fabricated, simulated
and also tested a solar dryer fitted with a novel design of absorber having inbuilt
thermal storage capabilities. The length of operation of the solar air heater and the
efficiency of the dryer were increased, and better quality of agricultural products in
terms of colour value was obtained compared with open sun drying. MacPhee and
Dincer [15] worked on thermodynamic analyses of the process of charging of an
encapsulated ice thermal energy storage device (ITES) through heat transfer. The
energy efficiencies are found to be more than 99%, whereas the thermal exergy
efficiencies are found to vary between 40% and 93% for viable charging times. The
results confirm the fact that energy analyses, and even thermal exergy analyses,
may lead to some unrealistic efficiency values.
Enibe [16] worked on the design, fabrication and performance evaluation of a
passive solar powered air heating system based on exergy analysis. The system
consists of a single-glazed flat plate solar collector integrated with a phase change
material (PCM) heat storage system. The PCM is prepared in modules, with the
modules equispaced across the absorber plate. The spaces between the module
pairs serve as the air heating channels, the channels being connected to common air
inlet and discharge headers. The experiments were carried out under the climatic
conditions of Nsukka (Nigeria) in the daytime with no-load conditions where the
ambient temperature varied in the range of 1941 C, and a daily global irradiation
varied in the range of 4.919.9 MJ/m
2
. Peak cumulative useful efficiency was found
to be about 50% while peak temperature rise of the heated air was about 15 C. The
system has been found suitable for the use as a solar cabinet crop dryer for aromatic
18

herbs, medicinal plants and other crops, which do not require direct exposure to
sunlight.
Kurtbas and Durmus [17] designed a new solar air heater and evaluated it on
the basis of exergy analysis. In their study they used five solar collectors with
dimensions of 0.9x0.4 m and the flow line increased where it had narrowed and
expanded geometrically in shape. These collectors were set to four different cases
with dimensions of 1x2 m. Therefore, heating fluids exit the solar collector after at
least 4.5 m displacement. According to the collector geometry, turbulence occurs in
fluid flow and in this way heat transfer is increased. In this study they found that the
efficiency of the collector enhances with the increase of mass flow rates due to an
enhanced heat transfer to the air flow and also increase in efficiency depends on the
surface geometry of the collector and extension of the air flow line. Collector
efficiency, temperature difference of the air and pressure loss is the more important
parameters in order to decrease the exergy loss.
Ajam et al. [18] worked on the optimization of the solar air heater based on the
exergetic analysis. For this purpose, an integrated mathematical model of thermal
and optical performance of the solar heater has been derived. The overall thermal
loss coefficient and other heat transfer coefficients of the heater were assumed to be
variable while deriving an equation for the exergy efficiency. Using the MATLAB
toolbox the exergy efficiency equation has been maximized. After maximizing the
exergy efficiency equation it has been compared with the thermal efficiency of the
heater, which ultimately results in an extraordinary increase of the exergy efficiency
according to the optimized parameters. They also concluded that the exergy analysis
was a better method for design, development and optimization of solar air heaters
due to the fact that exergy efficiency is a proportion to common quantities in solar
19

engineering such as thermal efficiency, temperature, pressure drop, mass flow rate
of fluid and others etc.
Kurtbas and Turgut [19] investigated the solar air heater with free and fixed fins
using exergy analysis. In this study each of the fins with rectangular shape was
having two different surface areas and located on the absorber surface in free and
fixed manners. In the first type, the fins were located on the absorber surface in a
way that the fins are able to move freely, while in the second type model fins were
fixed to the absorber surface. The absorber surface area was 1.64 m
2
while the fixed
and free fins with 8 and 32 items were having surface areas 0.048 and 0.012 m
2

respectively. Therefore the total fin area in the absorber surface was equal to
0.384m
2
. They found that the fins located in flow area increases the heat transfer
coefficient and output temperature of air due to which collector efficiency increases
too. Also they found that there exists a reverse relationship between exergy loss
ratio and collector efficiency as well as temperature difference of the fluid. Thus if
there is increase in the pressure drop, both heat transfer and exergy loss were also
found to be enhanced, while it has been observed that the exergy loss ratio was
affected less because heater has very little pressure drop.
Ucar and Inall [20] worked on the solar air collectors with passive
augmentation techniques using exergetic analysis. In order to provide better heat
transfer surfaces suitable for the passive heat transfer augmentation techniques
different shape and arrangement of absorber surfaces of the collectors were
reorganised. The performance of such solar air collectors with staggered absorber
sheets and attached fins on absorber surface were analysed and tested. It has been
found that the efficiency of solar collector has been increased approximately 10% to
30% as compared with the conventional solar collector using the passive techniques.
20

In conventional solar air heater, only a little part of solar energy absorbed by the
collector can be used therefore the performance of the conventional solar air heater
was found to be least.
Koca et al. [21] investigated the flat-plate solar collector with phase change
material (PCM) using energy and exergy analyses, CaCl
2
.6H
2
O has been used as
PCM in thermal energy storage (TES) system. Solar energy collection and storage
has been combined in single designed collector unit. Phase Change Material was
stored in a storage tank, which was located under the collector. For transferring heat
from collector to PCM a special heat transfer fluid was used. The experiments were
carried out for 3 different days in the month of October. From the measured data
calculations were made and they found that stored and instantaneous solar radiation
show bell-shaped variation during all experimental days. Also a significant difference
between energy and exergy efficiencies had been reported and the energetic
efficiency was always higher than that of exergetic efficiency. From the obtained
experimental data and calculations it has been found that the exergy efficiencies of
latent heat storage systems with PCM are very low.
Esen [22] worked on the energy and exergy analysis of a novel flat plate solar air
heater (SAH) with and without obstacles. The experiments were carried out at
different values of mass flow rate of air and different levels of absorbing plates in
flow channel duct. The measured parameters were solar radiation and temperatures
at different state of points such as inlet, outlet, at the absorbing plate and the
ambient. After the analysis of the results it had been found that, the optimal value of
efficiency was in the middle level of absorbing plate in flow channel duct for all the
operating conditions and it was also found that the double-flow collector supplied
21

with obstacles (60.97%, for 0.025 kg/s and State II) were better than that of without
obstacles (25.65%, for 0.015 kg/s and State I).
Gupta and Kaushik [23] presented a comparative study of various types of
artificial roughness geometries in the absorber plate of solar air heater duct and their
characteristics based on energy, effective and exergy efficiencies. The performance
evaluation for some selected artificial roughness geometries in the absorber plate of
solar air heater duct in terms of energy efficiency, effective energy efficiency and
exergy efficiency has been carried out at various values of Reynolds number (R
e
). In
this study the correlations for heat transfer and coefficient of friction developed by
respective investigators have been used to calculate efficiencies. From the study it
has been found that the artificial roughness on absorber surface is the better option
in the enhancement of the efficiencies in comparison to smooth surface. The energy
efficiency was found to be increased in the following manner: smooth surface,
circular ribs, V shaped ribs, wedge shaped rib, expanded metal mesh, rib-grooved,
and chamfered ribgroove. The effective efficiency also found to be following the
same trend of variation among various considered geometries however trend was
reversed at very high Reynolds number. The exergy efficiency based criteria also
follows the same pattern; but the trend was reversed at relatively lower value of
Reynolds number and for higher range of Reynolds number the exergy efficiency
approaches zero or may be negative.
Ozgen et al. [24] had worked on a device for inserting an absorbing plate
made of aluminium cans into the double-pass channel in a flat-plate solar air heater.
In this experimental study, three different absorber plates had been designed and
tested. In the first type (Type I), cans had been staggered as zigzag on absorber
plate, and in Type II they were arranged in order, while in Type III a flat plate was
22

without cans. Experiments were performed at air mass flow rates of 0.03 kg/s and
0.05 kg/s. From the experiments it has been found that the double-flow type of the
solar air heater with aluminium cans has been introduced for increasing the heat-
transfer area has the improved thermal efficiency. Because of the double heat-
transfer area in double-flow systems, the performance of double-flow type solar air
heater, in which air was flowing simultaneously over and under absorbing plate, is
found to be more efficient than that of the devices with one flow channel over or
under the absorbing plate.
Farahat et al. [25] worked on the exergetic optimization of flat plate solar
collector, in this study a simulation program has been developed for the thermal and
exergetic calculations. A detailed energy and exergy analysis was carried out for
evaluating the thermal and optical performance, exergy flows and losses as well as
exergetic efficiency for a typical flat plate solar collector under given operating
conditions. The optical efficiency has a great effect on the exergy efficiency. By using
the flat plate solar collectors with optical concentrators, the optical efficiency
increases. It was found that the energy efficiency increases without extremum points
with operating parameters. The absence of such maximum points has created
difficulties in the design of flat plate solar collectors. However, the exergy efficiency
presents points of local maxima and a point of global maximum. The exergy
efficiency was found to be decreasing rapidly with increasing nature of ambient
temperature and the wind speed.
Akbulut and Durmu [26] had worked on energy and exergy analyses of the thin
layer drying process of mulberry via forced solar dryer. The drying experiments were
carried out at five different mass flow rate varied between 0.014 kg/s and 0.036 kg/s.
The effects of drying time and inlet air velocity on energy and exergy were evaluated.
23

The values of exergy loss were found to be as 10.82 W, 6.41 W, 4.92 W, 4.06 W and
2.65 W with the drying mass flow rate varied in the range, mentioned above.
However, the values of energy utilization ratio were found to be as 55.2%, 32.19%,
29.2%, 21.5% and 20.5% for the above said five different drying mass flow rates.
From the study it was found that the exergy loss decreases with the increase in the
mass flow rate of the drying air. The maximum exergy losses occurred for 0.014 kg/s
mass flow rate. After the study of thermal performance of solar dryer it had been
suggested that, in order to decrease the energy utilization and exergy losses: order,
structure, and moisture content of the products on the drying chamber should be
taken into consideration. Also it is necessary to show the variations of exergy with
drying time in order to get when and where the maximum and minimum values of the
exergy losses occur during the drying process.
Akpinar and Kocyigit [27] designed, fabricated and experimentally
investigated a new type of solar air heater with and without obstacles. The
experiments were carried out at two different air mass flow rates of 0.0074 and
0.0052 kg/s. It was found that the efficiency of the solar air collectors depends on
different parameters such as solar radiation, surface geometry of the collectors and
extension of the air flow line. The energy efficiency were found to be varied between
20% and 82% while those of exergy efficiency changed from 8.32% to 44.00% at the
above said mass flow rates. The highest efficiency was found to be for the solar air
heater (SAH) with absorbent plate in flow channel duct for all operating conditions,
whereas the lowest values were obtained for the SAH without obstacles. Also the
efficiency of the collector has been found to be increasing function of mass flow rate.
This shows that the exergy loss of the system decreased due to the increase in the
collector efficiency. Reverse relationship between dimensionless exergy loss and
24

heat transfer were also found in the study. The deciding parameters in order to
decrease the exergy loss were the collector efficiency, temperature difference of the
air. New relations were proposed to evaluate of the energy and exergy analysis of
SAH. It is concluded that the proposed procedure can be successfully employed for
predicting the SAH performance.
Alta et al [28] investigated the energy and exergy efficiency of three different
types of solar air heaters, two having fins and one without fins besides one heaters
with fins has single glass cover while the other two have double glass cover. The
energy and exergy output rates of the solar air heaters were evaluated at different air
flow rates viz. 25, 50 and 100 m
3
/m
2
h, tilt angle at 0, 15 and 30 and temperature
conditions versus time. They found that the heaters with double glass covers and
fins are more effective and the difference between the input and output air
temperature is higher than that of the other cases. It was also found that the lower air
flow rates will be beneficial in applications where higher temperature differences are
more important. Besides it has also been observed that using more transparent
cover and

fins increases the values of temperature differences. While transparent cover
decreases convection heat losses, fins obtain more heat because of an increase in
the heating time by circulating air inside.
Ezan et al. [29] has investigated the energetic and exergetic performances of
a latent energy storage system based on the shell and-tube TES unit during charging
(solidification) and discharging (melting) processes. The experimental system
consists of a heat exchanger section, a measurement system and flow control
systems. The inlet temperature varied from 5 C to 15 C for the charging mode,
25

and the volumetric flow rates varied from 2 to 8 Lt/min. The experiments were
performed for three different tube materials, copper, steel and PE32 with two
different shell diameters of 114 mm and 190 mm respectively, and the effects on
energetic and exergetic efficiencies were investigated. They concluded that the
exergetic efficiency increased with the increase in the inlet temperature and flow rate
during charging period while during the discharging period, the irreversibility
increased as the temperature difference between the PCM and the inlet heat transfer
fluid (HTF) increased.
Prommas et al. [30] worked on the energy and exergy analyses in drying
process of porous media using hot air. The main objectives of the study were as
follows: (i) exergy input and the distributions of the exergy losses of the different
drying operations (ii) the exergy losses of two operations porous packed bed and (iii)
the effect of operating parameters on exergy losses. From the study it was found that
as the drying time increases, the exergy efficiency of the drying chamber also
increases which is due to the fact that as the drying time increases the available
energy in the drying chamber also increases. They also presented the effect of the
other particle size on the drying time as well as the exergy efficiency of the drying
system. Furthermore, it was found that the exergy efficiencies of C-bed were higher
than of the F-bed about 10% after 60 min of drying time with parallel to the end of
drying process.
Panwar et al. [31] reviewed the literature on energy and exergy analyses of
solar drying systems and suggested that for utilizing low grade energy to dry
agricultural produces solar drying is the promising option. In their study they found
that the exergy efficiency is actual efficiency of the process due to irreversibility
associated with the system. Therefore it can be said that exergy analysis is a tool to
26

access the efficient usage of solar energy. It is the property of the system, which
gives the maximum power that can be obtained from the system when it is brought to
a thermodynamic equilibrium state from a reference state. The energy used in drying
of agricultural and industrial produce is significant and, therefore, represents an often
reducible element of process cost.
Saidur et al. [32] reviewed the literature on exergy analysis of solar energy
applications viz. solar photovoltaic, solar pond, solar air conditioning etc. From their
study they found that the thermal efficiency is not sufficient to choose the desired
system therefore it is necessary to apply the concept of exergy for specific design of
the systems. The highest exergy destruction was observed in solar collectors in most
of the solar heating devices and solar air conditioning systems. Increasing the mass
flow rate leads to an increment in exergetic efficiency in photovoltaic thermal
systems. Exergy efficiency of solar systems is highly dependent on the daily solar
radiation and radiation intensity.


2.2.2 Solar Water Heater
Use of solar energy for water heating is the most common application, mostly
three types of solar collectors based solar water heaters (SWH) are available in the
market viz. flat plate collector (FPC), evacuated tube collector (ETC), compound
parabolic collectors (CPC). Dharuman et al. [33], designed, constructed and did the
experiments on water heating device and its performance was evaluated under
various typical operating conditions. Nahar [34], did the comparative analysis of Cu
Al fin with CuCu fin in flat-plate collectors to test solar water heater. Anant et al.
[35], investigated and analyzed the performance of thermal energy storage based
27

solar water heater. Rakesh and Rosen [36] worked on the thermal performance
evaluation of an integrated solar water heater with a corrugated absorber surface.
Morrison et al. [37] evaluated the characteristics of evacuated tube based
solar water heaters also made an assessment of the circulation rate through single
ended tubes. Assuming that there was no interaction between adjacent tubes in the
collector array they developed a numerical model of the heat transfer and fluid flow
inside a single ended evacuated tube and the simulation study had been performed.
The computational domain used in this study was single-ended thermosyphon with a
constant pressure condition applied across the open end. In this study the
computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model was validated against Particle Image
Velocimetry (PIV) measurements. Experimental and simulation results showed that
there was a good agreement in a number of qualitative and quantitative parameters,
such as the location of the peak velocity, the peak velocity of the heated fluid stream,
the cross-over point between the two opposing streams and the flow structure as the
hot fluid rises up the tank.
Xiaowu and Ben [38] evaluated the performance of domestic scale solar water
heater based on exergy analysis. Three procedure theory as presented in the paper
exhibits great advantages as compared with other theories of energy analysis. From
the study, it was shown that the proper insulation of collector and storage barrel were
important as exergy losses due to imperfectly thermal insulation in collector and
exergy losses due to imperfectly thermal insulation in storage barrel cannot be
avoided. The exergetic efficiency of domestic-scale water heater was found to be
small due to low quality of output energy and exergy losses storage barrel.
Luminosu and Fara [39] determined the optimal operation mode of flat plate
collector using exergy analysis through simulation. In this study the exergy analysis
28

of a flat-plate solar collector based on the assumption that temperature at inlet fluid =
environment temperature = constant has been developed. The statistical data for the
solar radiation of a given area was used and the optimal values for the characteristic
quantities of the flat-plate solar collector had been obtained by developing the exergy
analysis for the selected model. The hot water supplied by this collector would be
used either directly, for example, for retarded, or showers, storing it in an insulated
tank. Another interesting application of this approach would use the swimming pools
model: alternatively, the hot water supplied by the solar collector would be
discharged in one of the swimming pools. That is open circuit condition for the use of
this solar collector is recommended.
Budihardjo et al. [40] developed a correlation for natural circulation flow rate
through single ended water-in-glass evacuated tubes mounted over a diffuse
reflector. Further, the numerical simulation showed that when the heat input was
concentrated on the top circumference of the tube, as in the case with collectors
mounted over a diffuse reflector. The effect of circumferential heat flux distribution on
the circulation flow rate through the tubes was not significant; therefore, the
correlation could be used to predict the flow rate at any time of day. Different flow
structures were observed in the tube when a concentrating reflector was used
underneath the collector.
Gunerhan and Hepbasli [41] studied the performance evaluation of solar water
heating system based on exergy analysis. The experiments were carried out under
the climatic condition of Izmir province (Turkey). Their main objective was basically
to analyse the different components of the system viz. flat plate solar collector, a
heat exchanger (storage tank) and a circulating pump, besides to investigate the
effect of variation in water inlet temperature on exergy efficiency of different
29

components and the overall system. The exergy efficiency on a product/fuel basis
was found to be varying between 2.02 and 3.37% for the solar collector, 16 and
51.72% for the heat exchanger, 10 and 16.67% for the circulating pump, while for
overall system it was found to be in the range of 3.27 to 4.39%.
Zambolin and Del Col [42] carried out the thermal performance evaluation of
two different types of solar collectors viz. glazed flat plate collector and an evacuated
tube collector. Both the collectors were installed in parallel and tested at the same
working conditions while the evacuated collector was a direct flow through type with
external compound parabolic concentrator (CPC) reflectors. The main objective of
this experimental work was the comparison of results between steady-state and
quasi-dynamic test methods for both the solar collectors i.e. for flat plate and
evacuated tube collectors. Also the objective of the study was to characterize and
compare the daily energy performance of the above mentioned collectors. The
efficiency has been plotted against the average reduced temperature it was also
shown that the daily efficiency can be estimated by using the parameters of the
quasi-dynamic model. Optical efficiency of the flat plate collector in the morning and
in the afternoon hours has been found to be decreasing due to more reflection
losses. While efficiency loss is reduced in the vacuum tube collector because of its
geometry, the most of the absorber area is exposed to quasi-normal incidence
radiation for a longer period of the day. Finally evacuated collector has been found to
be better than that of flat plate collector
Hayek et al. [43] investigated the performance evaluation of two different types of
evacuated tube solar collectors viz. water-in-glass tubes and the heat-pipe designs
under local weather conditions as encountered along the eastern coast of the
Mediterranean Sea. The experiments were performed during the months of
30

November to January, i.e. under winter-like conditions, for a clear sky days of the
months. Total 20 numbers of evacuated tubes along with a tank and a circulation
system with measurement tools, was constructed and used for the experimental
observation. The experimental study showed that the performance of ETC with heat
pipe design was better than that of water-in-glass designs and their efficiency has
been found to be almost 15 to 20% higher. However, their payback periods was
found to be much higher owing to their larger initial cost in the local market.
Ayompe et al. [44] represented the performance evaluation of two different types
of solar water heaters viz. flat plate collector (FPC) and heat pipe evacuated tube
collector (ETC) in temperate climate of Dublin (Ireland). The energy analysis on
daily, monthly and yearly basis was carried out and the performance of the above
mentioned systems were compared. Total 1984 kWh and 2056 kWh of heat energy
were collected by the 4 m
2
FPC and 3m
2
ETC systems respectively, for an annual
solar radiation of 1087 kWh/m
2
. The annual average collector efficiencies were found
to be 46.1% and 60.7%, while the system efficiencies were found to be 37.9% and
50.3% for the FPC and ETC respectively. Also from the economic analysis it was
found that both the systems are not economically viable and the simple payback
period varied between 13 years and 48.5 years for the FPC and ETC respectively.
Gang et al. [45] studied the compound parabolic concentrator (CPC)-type solar
water heater with a U-pipe and investigated its performance in meeting higher
temperature requirements. The experiments were carried out at Hefei (3153

N, 117
15

E), in the eastern region of China in the month of December. Keeping the fact in
the mind that the conventional solar water heaters based on flat collectors has low
efficiencies in attaining higher temperatures particularly above 50 C. They also
found that such types of systems are not useful for higher temperature applications
31

such as heat-powered cooling, building heating, industrial heating, seawater
desalination and so on. Therefore in this study the compound parabolic concentrator
(CPC)-type solar water heater with a U-pipe has been investigated. They found that
when the water temperature was heated from 26.9 C to 55, 65, 75, 85, and 95 C,
thermal efficiency was found to be decreasing function. In other words, the lower
thermal efficiency has been found at 95 C and found to be above 49%. The
exergetic efficiency has been found to be increasing in nature i.e. highest efficiency
was found to be at 55 C and found to always above 4.62%.
Ceylan [46] developed a new temperature controlled solar water heater (TCSWH)
and studied it based on energetic and exergetic analyses. Experiments have been
carried out at 40 C, 45 C, 50 C and 55 C and the designed system was also
compared with the thermosiphon system. A detailed comparison between TCSWH
and thermosiphon system were performed by calculating stored energy, storage
tank water temperatures, amount of water in the storage tank and system
efficiencies for both of the systems. The highest amount of water had been found to
be 108 kg by setting the control device at 40 C. The average energetic efficiency
was found to be 65% for the TCSWH and 60% for the thermosiphon system
respectively, thus, TCSWH was found to be better than that of thermosiphon system
for the same set of operating parameters.

2.3 Solar Photovoltaic Systems
Solar energy reaching the earth surface can be utilised directly in two ways,
firstly, by converting directly into electricity by the means of solar photovoltaic (SPV)
modules and secondly, by heating the medium by means of solar collectors for low
temperature heating applications. Presently, most of the SPV modules are based on
32

crystalline silicon technology which is basically dived into three technologies viz.
Mono-crystalline silicon (m-Si), multi-crystalline silicon (mc-Si) and ribbon silicon. In
general it has been found that the mono-crystalline- silicon wafer is more expensive
than that of multi-crystalline-silicon wafer and as far as the efficiency is concerned,
m-Si based module is better than that of mc-Si module. The single crystal silicon is
made of a cylindrical ingot and the crystal lattice of the entire sample is continuous
with no grain boundaries. On the other hand, the multi-crystalline are made of square
ingot and composed of multiple small silicon crystals [47]. The conversion efficiency
of commercial types of mc-Si cells are found to be in the range of 1215% however,
it can be enhanced up to 20% by using more sophisticated solar cell designs [48].
Smestad [49] examined concepts of hot carrier and light converter, indicating
that electrons are ejected not only as heat but also as light. Carnot factor in solar cell
theory was investigated by Landsberg and Markvart [50], they obtained an
expression for the open-circuit voltage which is equal to the band gap multiplied by
the Carnot efficiency. Thermodynamics and reciprocity of solar energy conversion
was also discussed by Markvart and Landsberg [51] by taking into consideration the
PV, photochemistry and photosynthesis. Sahin et al. [52] investigated the
thermodynamic characteristics of the solar photovoltaic (PV) cells using exergy
analysis. They developed and applied the new approach for the assessment of PV
cells and found that the presented approach was realistic as it accounts for
thermodynamic quantities such as enthalpy and entropy. They also analysed the PV
cells on the basis of the energy and exergy efficiencies, the energy efficiency was
found to be varying between 7-12% during the day while, the exergy efficiency was
found to be varying between 2-8%.
33

Bisquert et al. [53] investigated the physical and chemical principles of SPV
conversion systems. They found that the open-circuit voltage and chemical potential
of a SPV cell is dependent on Carnot and statistical factors. Joshi et al. [54]
investigated the performance characteristics of a photovoltaic (PV) and photovoltaic-
thermal (PV/T) system using energy and exergy analysis for the New Delhi, India.
They found that in the case of PV/T, the energy efficiency varies between 33-45%,
while the corresponding exergy efficiency varies between 11-16%. On the other
hand, for PV alone, the exergy efficiency was found to be varying in the range of 8-
14% for a typical set of operating parameters. They also calculated the fill factor in
order to know the behaviour of the exergy efficiency of the SPV systems and found
that the higher the fill factor better would be the exergy efficiency. Hepbasli [55] has
done a literature review on exergy analysis of several solar energy systems
especially photovoltaic thermal systems and gave similar expressions as given by
Fujisawa and Tani [56] and Saitoh et al. [57].
Joshi et al. [58] did the thorough review on performance evaluation of
photovoltaic (PV) and photovoltaic thermal (PV/T) systems based on electrical as
well as thermal output e.g., electrical, thermal, energy, and exergy efficiency. Work
done by different authors on Photovoltaic systems and their applications were also
revealed in this study. Applications of PV systems were classified according to their
use, i.e., electricity production and thermal applications. A case study for PV and
PV/T system based on exergetic analysis was also presented. From the extensive
literature review, they found that the exergy efficiency of PV/T systems is higher than
those of PV alone system as the PV/T systems gives useful thermal output apart
from electricity. Also it has been observed from the study that electrical as well as
thermal efficiencies can be increased by using reflecting surfaces because by using
34

reflector more incident radiations can be used. The thermal efficiency of PV/T water
collector has been found to be more than that of PV/T air collector which is an
obvious case as the density of water is higher than that of air.
Sarhaddi et al. [59] worked on performance analysis of solar photovoltaic
thermal (PV/T) air collector using exergetic analysis. For the estimation of the
electrical parameters of a PV/T air collector an improved electrical model was used
in the present study and then in terms of design and climatic parameters a modified
equation for the exergy efficiency of a PV/T air collector is derived. For calculating
thermal and electrical parameters of a PV/T air collector had also been developed.
Numerical simulation results and modified exergy efficiency obtained in the present
study showed the good agreement with the experimental measurements noted in the
previous literature. For a sample climatic, operating and design parameters, the
thermal efficiency, electrical efficiency, overall energy efficiency and exergy
efficiency of PV/T air collector were found to be 17.18%, 10.01%, 45% and 10.75%
respectively.
Tiwari et al. [60] did the literature survey on thermal modelling of photovoltaic
(PV) modules and their applications. In the review article different applications of PV
module based on electrical and thermal output has been covered. Also in that article
they covered the detailed description and thermal model of PV and hybrid
photovoltaic thermal (HPVT) systems, using water and air as the working fluid. The
numerical modelling and analysis of thermal and electrical output of PV and HPVT in
terms of an overall thermal energy and exergy has been carried out in this study.
From their extensive literature review, they found that the photovoltaic-thermal (PVT)
modules were very promising devices and there exists a lot of scope to further
improve the performances. The CIGS solar cells in the BIPVT system are the most
35

suitable from the energy payback time (EPBT) and energy production factor (EPF)
point of view. However, mono-crystalline solar cells in the BIPVT system were found
to be the most suitable from the life cycle conversion efficiency (LCCE) point of view.
Vats and Tiwari [61] carried out the performance study of a building integrated
semitransparent photovoltaic thermal (BISPVT) system integrated on the roof of a
room based on energy and exergy analysis. Six different types of SPV modules viz.
monocrstallne Silicon (m-Si), polycrystalline Silicon (p-Si), amorphous silicon (a-Si),
Cd-Te, CIGS and heterojunction with intrinsic thin layer (HIT) have been used for
comparative performance evaluation. They found that as the cell temperature
increases the exergy efficiency decreases and the maximum annual electrical
energy produced by HIT was found to be 810 kW h, and suggested that this module
suitable for generating electricity. However, maximum annual thermal energy
produced by a-Si was found to be 464 kW h and it was also found that to be suitable
for space heating applications while the efficiency was found to be 16.0% for HIT
and 6.0% for a-Si respectively.

2.4 Renewable Energy Cooking Devices
Literature review of Renewable energy cooking devices has been divided into
two parts viz. solar cooker and biomass cook stoves.

2.4.1 Solar Cooker
The standard proposed by Mullick et al. [62] is more complicated and less
universal than the one being evaluated, though the characteristic curve they
developed is a good predictive tool. Grupp et al. [63] employ a test procedure that
presents much useful information especially for Europe. In recent years several
36

authors have investigated methodologies for the evaluation and comparison of solar
cookers [62-65]. Traditional methods of characterizing the performance of solar
cookers are based on energy analysis [6768] as they are based on the first law of
thermodynamics and provide information about the total quantity of energy without
investigating the quality and the availability of energy. The exergetic analysis of low
cost parabolic type and box type solar cooker was conducted by Ozturk [69] for the
first time in 2004. Inspired from the study of Ozturk [69], Petela [70] in 2005 carried
out the performance evaluation of a cylindrical trough shape solar cooker based on
the exergetic analysis. Comparative study on energy and exergy efficiency for Box
type and parabolic type solar cookers was conducted by Oztruk [71] under the
climatic conditions of Turkey.
Buddhi and Sahoo [72] designed a box-type solar cooker having latent heat
storage and showed that it is possible to cook the food, even in the evening hours
with latent heat storage. Nahar [73] designed, developed and tested a novel solar
cooker that does not require any tracking and its performance was compared with a
hot-box type solar cooker. The overall efficiency of the novel solar cooker was found
to be 29.5% and the payback period was found to be between 1.30 and 3.29 years
depending upon the fuel it replaces. Gaur et al. [74] made a performance study of
the box-type solar cooker with special emphasis on the shape of lid of the utensils
used. The study revealed that the performance of a solar cooker could be improved
if a utensil with a concave shape lid is used instead of a plain lid generally provided
with the solar cookers. Buddhi et al. [75] also analyzed the thermal performance of a
box type solar cooker on the basis of first and second figure of merit with and without
load respectively and found that the second figure of merit depends on the quantity
37

of water loaded in the solar cooker and emphasized that the test method should
specify the amount of water to be taken.
Petela [70] worked on the exergetic analysis of simple parabolic type solar
cooker (SPC) of the cylindrical trough shape. Cooking pot, reflector and imagined
surface making up the system are the foremost important parts of the solar cooker
study therefore the equations for heat transfer between these three surfaces were
developed. The model allowed the theoretical estimation of the energy and exergy
losses: unabsorbed insolation, convective and radiative heat transfers to the
ambient. Besides, the exergy losses: the radiative irreversibilities on the surfaces
and the irreversibility of the useful heat transferred to the boiling water. Detailed
methodology for the exergy analysis of SPC and the distribution of the exergy losses
had been presented in this study and he also explained the method of determining
exergy loss on the radiating surface specifically, when the surface absorbs radiation
fluxes at different temperatures. From the study it had been observed that for the
enhancement of the energy and exergy efficiencies of the cooker optimization f
different parameters is important. Due to the escape of a large amount of insolation
which is not absorbed, and due to the heat loss to the ambient energy efficiency
were found to be very low. As far as exergy is concerned, the exergy efficiency had
been found to be lower than that of energy efficiency which is due to the fact that,
energy efficiency is based on first law of thermodynamics while the exergy efficiency
on second law of thermodynamics which considers all the losses due to irreversibility
and entropy generation. Besides, the losses due to absorptance of radiation on the
surfaces of the reflector and the cooking pot. The energy efficiency of the SPC was
found to be in the range of 6% to 19% while the exergy efficiency was found to be
below 1 %, which is due to the fact as explained above.
38

Kaushik and Gupta [76] studied the performance analyses of community-size and
domestic-size paraboloidal solar cooker based on energy and exergy analyses. The
study showed that the community-size solar cooker (CSC) has the high energy,
exergy efficiencies and low characteristic boiling time as compared with the
domestic-size paraboloidal solar cooker (DSC). In other words, the performance of
CSC was found to be better than that of the DSC. They also suggested that the
exergy efficiency can be increased only up to some extent by increasing the
reflectivity of the reflectors, proper designing of cooking place and using a suitable
cooking pot. The time required to heat the water up to boiling temperature was also
estimated and this indicated that such cookers are suitable to cook a meal faster
besides the quality of the meal cooked was found to be better than that cooked by
traditional cookers. The low efficiency of DSC was found to be lower due to the
optical and thermal losses from the reflector and pot. As the solar radiation is rich in
exergy and being utilized in the form of heat at low temperature therefore, the exergy
efficiency of any solar cooker or solar thermal device is very low.
Mawire et al. [77] had worked on the thermal energy storage (TES) system of
an indirect solar cooker using simulated energy and exergy analyses, an oilpebble
bed was used as the TES material in their study. For the performance analysis of
the TES system using energy and exergy analyses two different charging methods
were used. The constant flow rate for charging the TES system was used in first
method however, in the second method, the flow rate was made variable to maintain
a constant charging temperature. From their study it was found that the energy
stored in constant-temperature charging method had larger than that of constant-flow
rate charging method. The energy and exergy rates for the constant- temperature
method were found to be slightly lower than that of the constant-flow rate method for
39

lower solar radiation conditions. However, the best results for exergy rates and
exergy efficiencies were obtained by using the constant-temperature method at high
solar radiation conditions. For both methods, the exergy efficiencies were found to
be smaller than that of the energy efficiencies. Therefore, from the study it was
concluded that the constant-temperature method performs better than that of the
constant-flow rate method at high solar radiation conditions. While, the performance
of solar cooker at constant-flow rate method was found to be better for low solar
radiation conditions.
Mawire et al. [78] also studied the mathematical models for thermal energy
storage (TES) system and thermal energy utilization (TEU) system of an indirect
solar cooker to perform the discharging simulations in an indirect solar cooker.
Discharging results of the TES system were presented using two different methods.
In the first method, the discharge of the TES system was at a constant flow-rate
while in the second method, the flow-rate was varied in order to maintain a desired
power at a constant inlet temperature. The results of discharging the TES system at
a constant flow-rate indicated a higher rate of heat utilization which was not found to
be beneficial due to the cooking process since, the maximum cooking temperature
could not be maintained for the duration of the discharging period. On the other
hand, the controlled load power discharging method had a slower initial rate of heat
utilization but the maximum cooking temperature was maintained for most of the
discharging process which is the desirable condition for the cooking process.
Kumar et al. [79] worked on the truncated pyramid type solar box cooker
(TPSBC) and presented an exergy analysis based on the test protocol. The energy
and exergy balance for two different types of solar cooker viz. TPSBC and box type
solar cooker (SBC) was carried out and the variations in their values with time and
40

temperature difference were also compared. The variations in the exergy loss with
temperature difference was analysed for the selected water temperature range from
60 C to 95 C. The peak exergy, quality factor, and the heat loss coefficient were
found to be 7.124W, 0.15, 4.09 W/m
2
K, respectively, for TPSBC and 9.95W, 0.14,
4.89 W/m
2
K, respectively, for SBC. These parameters for the first time were
proposed to be the performance indicators for solar cookers. From the results of the
study it was concluded that the exergy analysis of box type solar cookers is a
practical, comprehensive and realistic tool for solar cookers performance evaluation
as it emphasized on the quality of energy.
Kumar et al. [80] also studied the solar cookers of different geometries and
presented an exergy based unified test protocol. In this study, four exergy based
parameters viz. peak exergy, quality factor, exergy temperature difference gap
product and heat loss coefficient were proposed for solar cookers at different
topological design, as their thermal performance indicators. Calculations had been
made and graphs between exergy output power and temperature difference were
plotted. It was observed that these parameters resemble a parabolic curve for each
design and the peak exergy can be accepted as a measure of devices fuel ratings.
They proposed that the quality factor of the solar cooker can be defined as the ratio
of the peak exergy power gained to the exergy power lost at an instant of time. It had
also been found that the exergy power lost is directly proportional to temperature
difference irrespective of the topology of the device and the slope of the straight line
obtained through curve fitting represents the heat loss coefficient of the cooker. It
was also mentioned that the proposed parameters in this study could lead to the
development of unified test protocol for solar cookers of different geometries.

41

2.4.2 Biomass Cook Stoves
Due to the energy crisis during the 1970s, the improvement in biomass cook
stoves to save large quantity of fuel consumed by these cook stoves was considered
as an urgent need and many countries across the world started working on the
same. Several developing countries including India, started national level
programmes on the research, development and dissemination of improved cook
stoves. National Program on Improved Cook-stoves (NPIC) was initiated in the year
1983 by the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE), Government of India.
Since, than many efforts and researches were conducted to augment the thermal
efficiencies of cook stoves and to reduce the indoor air pollution levels. Learning
from the experiences of this programme, it was found that there is a need of new
initiative on the cook stoves with a different approach considering the changes that
have taken place in the society, technology and the global concerns [81, 82].
Several studies on energy and exergy analysis of woody biomass,
herbaceous and agricultural biomass were reported in the literature [83]. A study by
Zhong et. al. [84] revealed that biomass is converted to a liquid fuel with an
approximately high energy, which is called bio-crude. The maximum exergy
efficiency of this process can be as high 86 % and was calculated based on the
equations developed by Szargut et al. [85]. An energy analysis of rape seed oil
methyl ester (RME) was investigated by Kalinc et al. [86] and it was found that the
process analysis method is a common method to obtain reasonable data for energy
and exergy analysis. The chemical exergy of liquid fuels was calculated and
estimated and the chemical exergy of rape seed oil and RME was reported to be
44.5 MJ/kg and 50.5 MJ/kg respectively. Ojeda et al. [87] evaluated the lingo-
cellulosic biomass and calculated the exergy of main stream process such as re-
42

treatment, fermentation and separation. According to Dincer et al. [88] to harvest
good results and/or to get better thermal efficiencies of any system not only quantity
but also the quality of energy should be considered. It was found the energy
efficiencies are usually lower than the energy efficiencies as some of input is lost
because of inevitable circumstances. Saidur et al. [89] had done the literature survey
on the exergy analysis of various biomass viz. herbaceous and agricultural biomass,
woody biomass, contaminated biomass and industrial biomass, aquatic biomass. In
their study they found that the gasification, methanation and CO
2
removal were the
main sources of exergy losses.

2.5 Exergoeconomics
In the analysis and design of energy systems, the techniques which combine
scientific disciplines (energy, thermodynamic) with the economic disciplines mainly
cost accounting to achieve the optimum designs are often used. For energy
conversion devices, cost accounting conventionally considers unit costs based on
energy [90]. Exergoeconomic evaluation is based on the concept of exergetic cost.
For a thermodynamic system, the exergetic cost of an input, output or internal
physical flow is defined as the amount of exergy per unit time required to produce
that flow [91]. Few researchers [9295] have recommended that costs are better
distributed among outputs based on exergy than that of energy because exergy is
more consistent measure of economic value of a system. In addition, most of these
researchers have developed methods for performing economic analyses based on
exergy, which are referred to by a variety of names e.g. thermoeconomics, second-
law costing, cost accounting and exergoeconomics. Exergoeconomic evaluation has
been carried out by many investigators, but recently their studies have intensified for
43

thermal power plant [96, 97]), cogeneration systems [98, 99] and on other thermal
applications [100, 101].
Kim et al. [102] proposed the exergoeconomic analysis of thermal systems
and derived the general cost-balance equation which can be applied to any
component of a thermal system. The proposed exergy-costing method has been
applied to a 1000-kW gas turbine cogeneration system. The exergy of a material
stream was decomposed into thermal, mechanical and chemical exergy flows and an
entropy-production flow in their study [102]. In their methodology a set of equations
for the unit costs of various exergies has been obtained. By applying the cost-
balance equation to each component of the system and to each junction the
monetary evaluations of various exergy (thermal, mechanical, etc.) costs, as well as
the production cost of electricity of the thermal system had been analysed. They also
concluded that this exergy costing method provides information on decisions about
the design and operation of the cogeneration system, besides the cost of losses of
the system can also be obtained.
Ozgener and Hepbasli [103] investigated the capital costs and thermodynamic
losses for devices in the solar-assisted ground-source heat pump greenhouse
heating system with a U-bend ground heat exchanger. The basic objective of this
experimental study was to find out the capital costs and thermodynamic losses for
devices in solar assisted ground source heat pump greenhouse heating system. The
experiments were carried out at the Solar Energy Institute of Ege University, Izmir,
Turkey. The results showed that a systematic correlation appears to existed between
the capital cost and exergy loss (total or internal) for components and the overall
system. From their study it was found that the electrical, mechanical and isentropic
efficiencies are the main cause of exergy destructions in the system and also point
44

out the attention to these equipments, because the components of less performance
can reduce the overall performance of the system. The total exergy losses values

were found to be from 0.010 kW to 0.480 kW for the system and most of the losses
occurred in the greenhouse and compressor.
Ucar and Inalli [104] developed an exergoeconomic model for analysis and
optimization of solar heating systems with residential buildings. Using MATLAB
optimization toolbox, the optimum collector area and storage volume for solar-
assisted heating system under the climatic condition of Elazg, Turkey (38.7N) were
obtained. Each of the components of a solar heating system with seasonal storage
was analysed using exergy analysis and the corresponding exergy losses were
obtained. It was found from their study that the optimum collector area in the
cylindrical storage system was larger than that of the trapeze storage system and
therefore, the total cost of the cylindrical storage system is higher than that of
trapeze storage system. From their study it was concluded that the size and type of
storage play an important role in the seasonal storage solar heating systems.
Ozgener et al. [105] worked on the exergoeconomic analysis of geothermal
district heating systems through mass, energy, exergy and cost accounting analyses
and also presented a case study for the Salihli geothermal district heating system
(SGDHS) in Turkey. Relations between energetic and exergetic losses and capital
costs for the Salihli geothermal district heating system had been investigated. From
the study it was found that a systematic correlation appears to exist between exergy
loss rate and capital cost for the plant. Furthermore, a correlation appears to exist
between the mean thermodynamic loss rate-to-capital cost ratios for all of the
45

devices in a SGDHS. The exergy destruction in the systems was found mainly due to
the thermal line, heat exchangers and pumps.

Sahoo [106] carried out an exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a
cogeneration system which produces 50 MW of electricity and 15 kg/s of saturated
steam at 2.5 bar. He optimized the unit using exergoeconomic principles and
evolutionary programming, and showed that the cost of electricity production is 9.9%
lower for the optimum case in terms of exergoeconomics compared to a base case.
Sayyaadi [107] performed an exergoeconomic optimization of a 1000 MW light water
nuclear power generation system using a genetic algorithm and considering ten
decision variables, and showed that the fuel cost of the optimized system is greater
than that for the base case and the shortcomings in the optimized system are
compensated by larger monetary savings in other economic sectors.
Ameri et al. [108] worked on the energy, exergy and exergoeconomic analysis for
the Hamedan steam power plant and estimated the exergy destruction and exergy
loss of each component of the power plant. In order to obtain a good insight into this
analysis the effects of the load variations and ambient temperature were calculated.
The exergy efficiencies of the boiler, turbine, pump, heaters and the condenser are
estimated at different ambient temperatures. From the energy analysis it was found
that the maximum energy loss occurred in the condenser (around 70.5%) while, in
the boiler the energy loss was found to be 15.5%. On the other hand, as far as
exergy is concerned, the major exergy loss was found in the boiler (around 81%) of
the total exergy destruction of the power plant cycle, while it was only 5% of total
exergy loss in the condenser. From the exergoeconomic poin of view, it has been
46

observed that the cost of the exergy destruction in the boiler and turbine was higher
than that of the other components cost.

Ahmadi et al. [109] carried out the comprehensive exergy, exergoeconomic
and environmental impact analysis and optimization of several combined cycle
power plants. The analyses of the results were performed in two different parts, in
the first part, the plant was analysed using thermodynamic fundamentals i.e. energy
and exergy analyses, besides the effect of supplementary firing on the natural gas-
fired plants. Also the effect of supplementary firing on the performance of bottoming
cycle and CO
2
emissions, were carried out using the first and second laws of
thermodynamics. For determining the best design parameters, a multi-objective
optimization was performed to determine the accounting for exergetic, economic and
environmental factors in the second part. Three objective functions were considered
in the optimization viz. the total cost rate of the system products, CCPP exergy
efficiency and CO
2
emissions of the overall plant. The environmental impact in terms
of CO
2
emissions was integrated with the exergoeconomic objective function as a
new objective function. The exergoeconomic analysis results showed that the
combustion chamber has the greatest cost of exergy destruction of all components,
besides increasing the gas turbine inlet temperature decreases the cost of the
exergy destruction of the combined cycle power plant.
Baghernejad and Yaghoubi [110] applied the concept of exergoeconomic to
optimize an integrated solar combined cycle system. An exergy-costing method was
applied to a 400MW integrated solar combined cycle system to estimate the unit
costs of electricity produced from the combined gas and steam turbines. They found
that the objective function decreased by about 11% and the overall exergoeconomic
47

factor of system increased by 27.34%, while the unit cost of electricity produced by
steam turbine and gas turbine reduced by about 7.1% and 1.17% respectively. This
was achieved, however, with 13.3% increase in the capital investment while the
exergy destruction cost reduced by 14.82% and the exergetic efficiency of the
system increased by 3%.
Yucer and Hepbasli [111] carried out the exergoeconomic analysis of a
dormitory heated by a conventional boiler in a central heating system. In this study
some heating equipments were comprehensively evaluated based on exergetic and
exergoeconomic analyses. A conventional boiler and a water heater in the central
heating system were considered in the analysis. The total exergy input rate had been
found to be 1455 kW, while the largest exergy loss rate was found to be 987.6 kW.
The exergetic efficiencies of the conventional boiler and the water heater were found
to be 15.6% and 20.4%, respectively. The exergoeconomic factors of the
conventional boiler and the water heater were calculated to be 0.72% and 0.14%,
respectively. These low values mean that the equipments at hand both of the
conventional boiler and the water heater were to be changed by more efficient ones.
The equipment efficiencies should be improved by increasing the capital investment,
which behave more specific in the procurement of the equipments.

2.6 Conclusions of Literature Review
A comprehensive literature review on energy and exergy analyses of renewable
energy conversion systems including solar air heater, solar water heater, solar
photovoltaic and cooking devices such as solar cooker and biomass cook stoves
have been carried out. Apart from the energy and exergy analyses of renewable
48

energy systems the literature review on exergoeconomics was also carried out which
is one of the objectives of the thesis. From the literature review of exergy analysis of
different renewable energy conversion systems, it was found that, there has been
gaps in these areas because of the fact that the exergy analysis of the following
system is scant:
Solar thermal devices in general and solar air/water heaters in particular.
The exergy analysis of biomass based energy systems.
The exergy analysis of photovoltaic modules.
The literature review on the exergoeconomics evaluation of renewable
energy systems.
The gaps in the literature review helped in identifying the objectives and
investigations of the proposed thesis. The proposed thesis is an attempt to fill the
gaps in the above mentioned literature review especially, the renewable energy
systems.

References
1. Pangavhane D.R., Sawhney R.L. (2002). Review of research and
development work on solar driers for grape drying. Energy Conversion &
Management, 43:4561
2. Midilli A. (2001). Determination of pistachio drying behavior and conditions in
a solar drying system. International Journal of Energy Research, 25:715-725
3. Shanmugam V., Natarajan E. (2007). Experimental study of regenerative
desiccant integrated solar dryer with and without reflective mirror. Applied
Thermal Engineering, 27:1543-1551
4. Hawlader M.N.A., Uddin M.S., Khin M.M. (2003). Microencapsulated PCM
49

thermal energy storage system. Applied Energy, 74:195-202
5. Ahmad A., Saini J.S., Varma H.K. (1996). Thermo-hydraulic performance of
packed bed solar air heaters. Energy Conversion & Management, 37:205-214
6. Mohanraj M., Chandrasekar P. (2009). Performance of a solar drier with and
without heat storage material for copra drying. International Journal of Global
Energy Issues, 32:112-121
7. Kurtbas I., Durmus A. (2004). Efficiency and exergy analysis of a new solar air
heater. Renewable Energy, 29:1489-1501
8. Luminosu I., Fara L. (2005). Determination of the optimal operation mode of a
flat solar collector by exergetic analysis and numerical simulation. Energy,
30:731-747
9. Torres-Reyes J.J., Gonzlez N., Zaleta-Aguilar A., Gortari J.G.C. (2003).
Optimal process of solar to thermal energy conversion and design of
irreversible flat plate solar collectors. Energy, 28:99-113
10. Bakos C., Ioannidis I., Tsagas N.F., Seftelis I. (2001). Design optimization and
conversion efficiency determination of a line-focus-parabolic-trough solar
collector. Applied Energy, 68:43-50
11. Kaushik S.C., Singhal M.K., Tyagi S.K. (2001). Solar collector technologies for
power generation and space air conditioning applications a state of the art
internal report. Centre for Energy Studies; Indian Institute of Technology;
Delhi: India.
12. Tyagi S.K., Wang S.W., Kaushik S.C., Singhal M.K., and Park S.R. (2007)
.Exergy analysis and parametric study of concentrating type solar collectors.
International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 46:1304-1310
13. Ozturk H.H., Demirel Y. (2004). Exergy-based performance analysis of
50

packed-bed solar air heaters. International Journal of Energy Research,
28:423432
14. Potdukhe P.A., Thombre S.B. (2008). Development of a new type of solar
dryer: Its mathematical modeling and experimental evaluation. International
Journal of Energy Research, 32:765782
15. MacPhee D., Dincer I. (2009). Thermal modelling of a packed bed thermal
energy storage system during charging. Applied Thermal Engineering,
29:695705
16. Enibe S.O. (2002). Performance of a natural circulation solar air heating
system with phase change material energy storage. Renewable Energy,
27:6986
17. Kurtbas I., Durmus A. (2004). Efficiency and exergy analysis of a new solar air
heater, Renewable Energy, 29:14891501
18. Ajam H., Farahat S., Sarhaddi F. (2005). Exergetic Optimization of Solar Air
Heaters and Comparison with Energy Analysis. International Journal of
Thermodynamics, 8 (4):183-190
19. Kurtbas I., Turgut E. (2006). Experimental Investigation of Solar Air Heater
with Free and Fixed Fins: Efficiency and Exergy Loss. International Journal of
Science & Technology,1(1):75-82
20. Ucar A., Inall M. (2006). Thermal and exergy analysis of solar air collectors
with passive augmentation techniques. International Communications in Heat
and Mass Transfer, 33:12811290
21. Koca A., Oztop H.F., Koyun T., Varol Y. (2008). Energy and exergy analysis
of a latent heat storage system with phase change material for a solar
collector. Renewable Energy, 33:567574
51

22. Esen H. (2008). Experimental energy and exergy analysis of a double-flow
solar air heater having different obstacles on absorber plates. Building and
Environment, 43:10461054
23. Gupta M.K., Kaushik S.C. (2009). Performance evaluation of solar air heater
for various artificial roughness geometries based on energy, effective and
exergy efficiencies. Renewable Energy, 34:465476
24. Ozgen F., Esen M., Esen H. (2009). Experimental investigation of thermal
performance of a double-flow solar air heater having aluminium cans.
Renewable Energy, 34:23912398
25. Farahat S., Sarhaddi F., Ajam H. (2009). Exergetic optimization of flat plate
solar collectors. Renewable Energy, 34:11691174
26. Akbulut A., Durmu A. (2010). Energy and exergy analyses of thin layer
drying of mulberry in a forced solar dryer. Energy, 35:17541763
27. Akpinar E.K., Kocyigit F. (2010). Energy and exergy analysis of a new flat-
plate solar air heater having different obstacles on absorber plates. Applied
Energy, 87:34383450
28. Alta D., Bilgili E., Ertekin C., Yaldiz O. (2010). Experimental investigation of
three different solar air heaters: Energy and exergy analyses. Applied Energy,
87:29532973
29. Ezan M.A., Ozdogan M., Gunerhan H., Erek A., Hepbasli A. (2010). Energetic
and exergetic analysis and assessment of a thermal energy storage (TES)
unit for building applications. Energy and Build, 42:18961901
30. Prommas R., Rattanadecho P., Cholaseuk D. (2010). Energy and exergy
analyses in drying process of porous media using hot air. International
Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 37:372378
52

31. Panwar N.L., Kaushik S.C., Kothari S. (2012). A review on energy and exergy
analysis of solar dying systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,
16:2812 2819
32. Saidur R., BoroumandJazi G., Mekhlif S., Jameel M. (2012). Exergy analysis
of solar energy applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,
16: 350356
33. Dharuman C., Arakeri J.H., Srinivasan K. (2006). Performance evaluation of
an integrated solar water heater as an option for building energy conservation,
Energy and Buildings, 38:214219
34. Nahar N.M. (2002). Capital cost and economic viability of thermosyphonic
solar water heaters manufactured from alternate materials in India,
Renewable Energy, 26:623635
35. Anant S., Buddhi D., Sawhney R.L. (2009). Solar water heaters with phase
change material thermal. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13:
21192125
36. Rakesh K., Rosen M.A. (2010). Thermal performance of integrated collector
storage solar water heater with corrugated absorber surface. Applied Thermal
Engineering, 30:17641768
37. Morrison G.L., Budihardjo I., Behnia M. (2005). Measurement and simulation
of flow rate in a water-in-glass evacuated tube solar water heater. Solar
Energy, 78:257267
38. Xiaowu W., Ben H. (2005). Exergy analysis of domestic-scale solar water
heaters. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 9:638645
53

39. Luminosu I., Fara L. (2005). Determination of the optimal operation mode of a
flat solar collector by exergetic analysis and numerical simulation. Energy, 30:
731747
40. Budihardjo I., Morrison G. L., Behnia M. (2007). Natural circulation flow
through water-in-glass evacuated tube solar collectors. Solar Energy, 81:
14601472
41. Gunerhan H., Hepbasli A. (2007). Exergetic modeling and performance
evaluation of solar water heating systems for building applications. Energy
and Buildings, 39:509516
42. Zambolin E., Del Col D. (2010). Experimental analysis of thermal performance
of flat plate and evacuated tube solar collectors in stationary standard and
daily conditions. Solar Energy, 84:13821396
43. Hayek M., Assaf J., Lteif W. (2011). Experimental Investigation of the
Performance of Evacuated- Tube Solar Collectors under Eastern
Mediterranean Climatic Conditions. Energy Procedia, 6: 618626
44. Ayompe L.M., Duffy A., Mc Keever M., Conlon M., McCormack S.J. (2011).
Comparative field performance study of flat plate and heat pipe evacuated
tube collectors (ETCs) for domestic water heating systems in a temperate
climate. Energy, 36:3370-3378
45. Gang P., Guiqiang L., Xi Z., Jie J., Yuehong S. (2012). Experimental study
and exergetic analysis of a CPC-type solar water heater system using higher-
temperature circulation in winter. Solar Energy, 86:12801286
46. Ceylan I. (2012). Energy and exergy analyses of a temperature controlled
solar water heater. Energy and Buildings, 47:630635
54

47. Alcantara S.P., Del Canizo C., Luque A. (2005). Adaptation of monocrystalline
solar cell process to multicrystalline materials. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells, 87:
411421.
48. Schultz O., Glunz S.W., Willeke G.P. (2004). Multicrystalline silicon solar cells
exceeding 20% efficiency. Progress in Photovoltaic: Research and
Application, 12(7):553-558
49. Smestad G.P. (2004). Conversion of heat and light simultaneously using a
vacuum photodiode and the thermionic and photoelectric effects. Solar
Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 82 (12):227240
50. Landsberg P.T., Markvart T. (1998). Solid-State Electron, 42 (4):657
51. Markvart T., Landsberg P.T. (2002). Physica E, 14:71
52. Sahin A.D., Dincer I., Rosen M.A. (2007). Thermodynamic analysis of solar
photovoltaic cell systems. Solar Energy Material and Solar Cells, 91:153159
53. Bisquert J., Cahen D., Hodes G., Ruhle S., Zaban A. (2004). Journal of
Physical Chemistry B, 108 (24): 8106.
54. Joshi A.S., Dincer I., Reddy B.V. (2009). Thermodynamic assessment of
photovoltaic systems. Solar Energy, 83:11391149
55. Hepbasli A. (2008). A key review on exergetic analysis and assessment of
renewable energy resources for a sustainable future. Renewable and
Sustainable Review,12:593661
56. Fujisawa T., Tani T. (1997). Annual exergy evaluation on photovoltaic-thermal
hybrid collector. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 47:135148
57. Saitoh H., Hamada Y., Kubota H., Nakamura M., Ochifuji K., Yokoyama S.
(2003). Field experiments and analyses on a hybrid solar collector. Applied
Thermal Engineering, 23:20892105
55

58. Joshi A.S., Dincer I., Reddy B.V. (2009). Performance analysis of photovoltaic
systems: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,13:1884
1897
59. Sarhaddi F., Farahat S., Ajam H., Behzadmehr A. (2010). Exergetic
performance assessment of a solar photovoltaic thermal (PV/T) air collector.
Energy and Buildings, 42:21842199
60. Tiwari G.N., Mishra R.K., Solanki S.C. (2011). Photovoltaic modules and their
applications: A review on thermal modeling. Applied Energy, 88:22872304
61. Vats K., Tiwari G.N. (2012). Energy and exergy analysis of a building
integrated semitransparent photovoltaic thermal (BISPVT) system. Applied
Energy (Article in press)
62. Mullick S.C., Kandpal T.C., Saxena A.K. (1987). Thermal test procedure for
box-type solar cookers. Solar Energy, 39(4): 353.
63. Grupp M., Merkle T., Owen-Jones M. (1994). In Second International Solar
Cooker Test. European Committee for Solar Cooking Research & Synopsis,
Route dOlmet, F-34700 Lodeve, France
64. Funk P.A., Larson D.L. (1998). Parametric model of solar cooker
performance. Solar Energy, 62(1):63-68
65. Patel N.V., Philip S.K. (2000). Performance evaluation of three solar
concentrating cookers. Renewable Energy, 20(3):347355
66. Binark A.K., Turkmen N. (1996). Modelling of a hot box solar cooker. Energy
Conversion and Management, 37:303310
67. El-Sebaii A.A. (1997). Thermal performance of a box type solar cooker with
outerinner reflectors. Energy, 22:969978
56

68. Habeebullah M.B., Khalifa A.M., Olwi I. (1995). The oven receiver: an
approach toward the revival of concentrating solar cookers. Solar Energy, 54
:227237
69. Ozturk H.H. (2004). Second law analysis for solar cookers. International
Journal of Green Energy,1(2):227239
70. Petela R. (2005). Exergy analysis of the solar cylindrical-parabolic cooker.
Solar Energy, 79:221233
71. Ozturk H.H. (2007). Comparison of energy and exergy efficiency for solar box
and parabolic cookers. Journal of Energy Engineering, 133:5362
72. Buddhi D., Sahoo L.K. (1997). Solar cooker with latent heat storage: design
and experimental testing. Energy Conversion and Management,
38(5):493498
73. Nahar N.M. (1998). Design, development and testing of a novel non-tracking
solar cooker. International Journal of Energy Research, 22:1191-1198
74. Gaur A., Singh O.P., Singh S.K., Pandey G.N. (1999). Performance study of
solar cooker with modified utensil. Renewable Energy, 18:121129
75. Buddhi D., Sharma S.D., Sawhney R.L. (1999). Performance test of a box
type solar cooker: Effect of load on second figure of merit. International
Journal of Energy Research, 23:827-830
76. Kaushik S.C., Gupta M.K. (2008). Energy and exergy efficiency comparison of
community-size and domestic-size paraboloidal solar cooker performance.
Energy for Sustainable Development, XII (3): 60-64
77. Mawire A., McPherson M., van den Heetkamp R.R.J. (2008). Simulated
energy and exergy analyses of the charging of an oilpebble bed thermal
57

energy storage system for a solar cooker. Solar Energy Materials & Solar
Cells, 92:16681676
78. Mawire A., McPherson M., Van den Heetkamp R.R.J. (2010). Discharging
simulations of a thermal energy storage (TES) system for an indirect solar
cooker. Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, 94:11001106
79. Kumar N., Vishwanath G., Gupta A. (2011). An exergy based test protocol for
truncated pyramid type solar box cooker. Energy, 36:5710-5715
80. Kumar N., Vishwanath G., Gupta A. (2012). An exergy based unified test
protocol for solar cookers of different geometries. Renewable Energy, 44:
457-462
81. Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE), www.mnre.gov.in
82. Final Report. (2010). New Initiative for Development and Deployment of
Improved Cookstoves: Recommended Action Plan, IIT Delhi and TERI New
Delhi.; www.winrockindia.org/mnre/doc/Final_Report_Cookstove.doc
83. Obara S., Tanno I., Kito S., Hoshi A., Sasaki S. (2008). Exergy analysis of the
woody biomass Stirling engine and PEM-FC combined system with exhaust
heat reforming. Int J of Hydrogen Energy, 33:2289 2299
84. Zhong C., Peters C.J., Swaan Arons D.E.J. (2002). Thernodynamics
modelling of biomass conversion process. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 805-815
85. Szargut J. (2005). Exergy method: technical and ecological applications . WIT
Press
86. Kalinci Y., Hepbasli A., Dincer I. (2010). Efficiency assessment of an
integrated gasifier/boiler system for hydrogen production with different
biomass types. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 35:4991-5000
58

87. Ojeda K., Sanchez E., Kafarov V. (2010).Sustainable ethanol production from
lignocellulosic biomass-application of exergy analysis. Energy.
88. Dincer I., Rosen M.A. (2007). Exergy, energy, environment and sustainable
development. Elsevier
89. Saidur R., BoroumandJazi G., Mekhilef S., Mohammed H.A. (2011). A review
on exergy analysis of biomass based fuels. Renewable and Sustainable
Energy Reviews, (in press)
90. Rosen M.A., Dincer I., (2003). Exergoeconomic analysis of power plants
operating on various fuels. Applied Thermal Engineering, 23(6):643658
91. Dentice DAccadia M., Sasso M. (1998). Exergetic cost and exergoeconomic
evaluation of vapour-compression heat pumps. Energy, 23(11):937942
92. Gaggioli R.A., Wepfer W.J. (1980). Exergy economics. EnergyThe
International Journal, 5:823838
93. Reistad G.M., Gaggioli R.A. (1980). Available energy costing, in: R.A.
Gaggioli (Ed.), Thermodynamics: Second Law Analysis, ACS Symposium
Series 122, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC,143159
94. Tsatsaronis G., Winhold M. (1985). Exergoeconomic analysis and evaluation
of energy conversion plants. Parts 1& 2. EnergyThe International Journal,
10: 6994
95. Poredos A., Kitanovski A. (2002). Exergy loss as a basis for the price of
thermal energy. Energy Conversion and Management, 43:21632173
96. Kwak H.Y., Kim D.J., Jeon J.S. (2003). Exergetic and thermoeconomic
analyses of power plants. Energy, 28: 343360
97. Gorji-Bandpy M., Ebrahimian V. (2006). Exergoeconomic analysis of gas
turbine power plants. International Journal of Energy Journal, 7: 5767
59

98. Vieira L.S., Donatelli J.L., Cruz M.E. (2006). Mathematical exergoeconomic
optimization of a complex cogeneration plant aided by a professional process
simulator. Applied Thermal Engineering, 26:654662
99. Uhlenbruck S., Lucas K. (2004). Exergoeconomically-aided evolution strategy
applied to a combined cycle power plant. International Journal of Thermal
Sciences, 43:289296
100. Cardona E., Piacentino A. (2006). A new approach to exergoeconomic
analysis and design of variable demand energy systems. Energy, 31:490515
101. Mert S.O., Dincer I., Ozcelik Z. (2007). Exergoeconomic analysis of a
vehicular PEM fuel cell system. Journal of Power Sources, 165: 244252
102. Kim S.M., Oh S.D., KWON Y.H., Kwak H.Y. (1998). Exergoeconomic
Analysis of Thermal Systems. Energy, 23(5):393406
103. Ozgener O., Hepbasli A. (2005). Exergoeconomic analysis of a solar
assisted ground-source heat pump greenhouse heating system. Applied
Thermal Engineering, 25(10):14591471
104. Ucar A., Inalli M. (2006). Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a
solar-assisted heating system for residential buildings. Building and
Environment, 41:15511556
105. Ozgener L., Hepbasli A., Dincer I., Rosen M.A. (2007). Exergoeconomic
analysis of geothermal district heating systems: A case study. Applied
Thermal Engineering, 27:13031310
106. Sahoo P.K. (2008). Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a
cogeneration system using evolutionary programming. Applied Thermal
Engineering, 28(13):1580-1588
60

107. Sayyaadi H., Sabzaligol T. (2009). Exergoeconomic optimization of a 1000
MW light water reactor power generation system. International Journal of
Energy Research, 33(4):378-395
108. Ameri M., Ahmadi P., Hamidi A. (2009). Energy, exergy and
exergoeconomic analysis of a steam power plant: A case study. International
Journal of Energy Research, 33:499512
109. Ahmadi P., Dincer I., Rosen M.A. (2011). Exergy, exergoeconomic and
environmental analyses and evolutionary algorithm based multi-objective
optimization of combined cycle power plants. Energy, 36:5886-5898
110. Baghernejad A., Yaghoubi M. (2011). Exergoeconomic analysis and
optimization of an Integrated Solar Combined Cycle System (ISCCS) using
genetic algorithm. Energy Conversion and Management, 52:21932203
111. Yucer C.T., Hepbasli A. (2012). Exergoeconomic analysis of a central
heating system from the generation stage to the building envelope. Energy
and Buildings, 47:592599