COURT STRATEGIES

The following outline is how I would approach a Traffic Ticket. But that is Me. You may
want to alter the strategy in order to minimize inconvenience, stress, laziness, whatever.
A. First Strategy -- Oral Argument
1. This would e my !irst "trategy, only ecause in your shoes, I would want to #get
more practice# in their #court.# $nce I was confident in my own skills at answering their
assault%&uestions, then this would no longer e necessary. I found that I had to do this at
least '%1( times with different )udges*different situations, efore I could really rela+ in
court and know what to e+tpect. It is all new in the eginning, ut then you find that
#their script# falls along the same lines in all situations.
,. That #script# has to do with JURISDICTION. They do -$T have it, and so will do
anything to trick you into giving it to them. This is done via the #arraignment# process.
.ust think aout it %% IF they had .urisdiction in the first place, THEN they would not
need you to come in and #plead.# "o #arraignment# is set up $-/Y for the purpose of
getting your 0$-"1-T %% y hook or y crook. $therwise, they could )ust send you the
ill to pay, or send out the "heriff to arrest and imprison you, without any further ado.
2. Therefore you CHALLENGE JURISDICTION from the git%go. The attached #0ourt
"cript# outlines the asics. You 3/43Y" egin with the #5estricted 3ppearance#
statement. Then go on to challenge their )urisdiction. It is a good idea to mention the
.udge6s $ath in passing, and even etter to !I/1 the 3cceptance of $ath for the .udge,
7rosecutor, $fficer and any other #government# actors involved. Then have the #)udge#
take .udicial 0ognizance of it in court.
8. 3fter that, you challenge the 0harging Instrument 9#:erified 0omplaint#; for validity.
You do this y re&uiring the 7rosecutor to rea t!e C!arges int" t!e Re#"r an
Certi$y t!em t" t!e #"urt. This, they will never do. But if they do it to #call your luff,#
then )ust say, #Thank you, 7rosecutor, for per)uring yourself. I will soom file a 0riminal
0omplaint against you for 7er)ury and Treason against your $ath of $ffice and "edition
against the 7eople.# 4hen he #certifies the charges,# he also certifies the statutes to e
actual /aw, which they are not. The statutes are only corporate 7$/I0Y that applies
only to the fictional #government.# "o it is all !53<= from the git%go.
>. If you stumle, you can ask a few more emarrasing &uestions, such as, #7lease
produce evidence of a 0omplaining 7arty.# It is important to STA% ON &OINT. 3sk or
stay on a particular point at least THREE TI'ES, efore going to the ne+t one.
'. The issue of #0ontempt of 0ourt# may arise. This is a separate strategy that we can
cover later. 4rite me if you have concerns aout this.
(. Se#"n Strategy -- A$$ia)it "$ Release
This is your main 3ffidavit, refutting their *resum*ti"n of a contract or trust that
re&uires your performance. This is a #constructive trust,# which means that it is not
#e+press,# or written. "o they create a trust or contract y presumption 9#construction#;
and hold you to it without telling you. -ice trick, eh? Therefore you file your 3ffidavit to
reut any such presumptions on their part, and have the #)udge# take )udicial cognizance
of it, as well as their $ath. You can also add any other relevant facts to this 3ffidavit,
which the 7rosecution is re&uired to reut, or it stands as the facts in the case. They will
-1:15 answer, so Y$<5 facts will e the only ones in the case. You will then have
undisputed control of the #high ground.# "ample 3ffidavit is attached.
You give them 1( days to reut, or your 3ffidavit stands as the only facts in the case, y
tacit procuration. #T@1Y# will -1:15 respond, ecause doing so puts them into
personal )eapardy %% somewhere that they will never go. It is all fraud from the git%go, and
they know it. 3fter 1( days you send them a -otice of =efault, and opportunity to cure.
Then 2 days later send a !inal -otice of =efault. These are all filed into the case.
/ater in court you present the evidence, which is that your facts state you are "ne "$ t!e
*e"*le and not liale for their statutes. "ince the 7rosecutor did not challenge your
claimend "tatus, there is no controversy. Therefore the court has nothing to ad)udicate,
and must dismiss with pre)udice. 3ctually, the 0lerk of 0ourt is empowered to do that so
you first present the evidence to them and instruct with a 4rit of 7reacipe. If they do not
perform, you file a 4rit of Mandamus, mandating that they perform, show cause why
they are not re&uired, or e in contempt of court.
1nd of story.
C. 'ain Strategy -- N"ti#e an Deman +"r Demurrer "r '"ti"n t" Dismiss --y"ur
#!"i#e,
1. You must have this done, and done right, as your last defense againt their tyranny. You
could even collect damages, if you pressed the issue. 7erhaps you would like to do that
#ne+t time,# after you learned more aout 0omplaints. !or the time eing, you need to
know the maing points of the N"ti#e an Deman %%
a. "tate the !acts.
. "tate their =uty %% usually to secure your rigths.
Included would e the main ways that their rules re&uire them to act %%
1; 3dministrative procedure not followed
,; =efective "ummons
2; =efective "ervice
8; =efective 0harging Instrument 9#:erified 0omplaint#;
>; 5ight to Travel % Unaliena-le 0ommon /aw 5ight
'; Your car is a recreational vehicle and e+empt
A; -o I= re&uired y law
B; -o proof of "u)ect Matter .urisdiction
C; -o proof of "tanding
1(; -o 0orpus =elicti
11; -o 5eal 7arty in Interest
c. "tate their Breach of =uty
d. "tate the In)ury and =amages
e. "tate the 5estitution
,. You are also makng a 0ounterclaim in the -otice and =emand, of DA,>((, or DA>,(((
per day if imprisoned. This allows them to more easily alance their ooks, plus tells
them that you are serious aout your demand for rights and dur process.
2. "tate the $rder to "how 0ause. If they do not respond within the time limit, then they
agree y tacit procuration. Then you merely file a =efault.
8. If they do not dismiss at this point, then you can only O(JECT %% #on and for the
record# that they have e+ceeded their authority and have not proved .urisdiction. You
need to do this in order to make a record for appeal. You should e $B.10TI-E
throughout the hearing, at )ust aout everything that they do or say. If asked, #4hy do
you o)ect,# you can answer, #You have not proven .urisdiction according to law %%
neither personam nor su)ect matter. Therefore I o)ect to these proceedings.# $r )ust
simply, #Because it is not my wish.#
D. Final Strategy
This is only used if #found guilty.# You would then make a final statement at All"#uti"n.
which we can discuss after you have finished all the preliminary work. But that would
come much later, if at all, after the trial. If you play your cards right, you will not even
get close to this part.
Blessings,
Eeorge
3ttacking commerce commercially, FF from the level of commerceFF is a powerless
venture. "ince 1CB2 0anon /aw, it is our GpaperH which condemns us. The only paper
which will work for us is the 1=7 process on lue paper, signed with our lood. 4e must
attack commerce, ecclesiasticallyFF from the only level which the parasites respect, fear,
and derive their alleged power. They canFFand doFFchange the codes 9e.g.I <00; and
rules of commerce which they operate, however, they are powerless to change
1cclesiastical 0anon /aw ecause they are under it and must oey itJ they do not and
cannot KoperateL it.