Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Frederick II of
Prussia as art collector and patron
Christoph Martin Vogtherr
King Frederick II of Prussia brought together one of the largest and most
important collections of eighteenth-century art in Europe. One wonders how far
his strong erotic interest in males determined the quality and scope of his
collection. When we try to imagine a `homosexual' Rococo collector, two possible
ways of reconciling our contemporary image of homosexuality with our
conception of Rococo art come readily to mind. The most obvious is, of course,
that the Rococo `homosexual' should collect images of men as immediate objects
of desire. Frederick II fulfils this expectation; when he looked out of his circular
study in Sanssouci Palace near Potsdam, he glanced at a Greek bronze boy,
reaching out towards him. Frederick had acquired the work in 1747 from the
counts of Liechtenstein in Vienna, at a time when it was already a famous piece. It
had been in the possession of the dukes of Mantua, of Charles I in Whitehall, and
also of Nicolas Fouquet at Vaux-le-Vicomte. In Vienna, the Adoring Youth had
originally been in the collection of Prince Eugen of Savoy, in his day one of the
better known sodomites in the European high aristocracy.
1
With the Adoring
Youth, Frederick thus purchased an icon of pederastic, male desire in males which
had already long been defined as such.
There is a second clear way to imagine a `homosexual' Rococo collection,
for the image of the `Rococo' period has always been determined by a notion of
femininity. According to this line of thought, the collector's taste would be
formed by a predilection for things precious, for the applied arts, for the low
genres in painting. Frederick II's early collecting profile also fits well at least
partially into this second suggested pattern. Not only was the Prussian king
known as an obsessive collector of snuff-boxes, but his collection of paintings is
still famous today for its works by Watteau and his pupils, contemporary genre
paintings with the particularly unheroic subject of more or less unconsummated
courtly love.
2
Both notions describe certain aspects of Frederick II's art collecting reasonably
well. At the same time, they have our modern image of the `homosexual' man as
their starting point, rather than eighteenth-century perceptions and they
potentially contradict one another. It seems an obvious and important goal for us
to get beyond a mere census of male nudes or marquetry cabinets in order to
assess the relevance to a collector's collection of his `homosexuality'. Indeed, a
collection should be understood as a complex and ambiguous medium that also
Art History ISSN 0141-6790 Vol. 24 No. 2 April 2001 pp. 231246
231 Association of Art Historians 2001. Published by Blackwell Publishers,
108 Cowley Road, Oxford OX4 1JF, UK and 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA.
conveys messages about the collector's erotic interests and fears, both conscious
and unconscious.
Whenever our investigations go beyond the `age of homosexuality', the results
will be less obvious than we might hope for and more puzzling. Our recent
categories of `homosexuality' and `heterosexuality' do not seem to help an insight
which has by now become commonplace. As a starting point for our inquiries one
might rather chose Halperin's four modes of pre-modern `homosexuality', which
still largely apply to the eighteenth century: `(1) effeminacy, (2) pederasty or ``active''
sodomy, (3) friendship or male love, and (4) passivity or inversion'.
3
Certainly, the
first three at least bear discussion in our context.
Frederick II of Prussia is an ideal and well-documented object for our
inquiry, because he is both extremely typical as a figure of the eighteenth century
and as a collector, and at the same time one of outstanding importance.
4
We know
enough about his collections and the way he arranged artworks in his palaces to
examine questions of object choice and gender in context, and to check notions
sketched so far against Frederick's practice. We will have to look closely at
Frederick's strategies to locate the images of love in his palaces and gardens and
to determine the kind of love that these sites construct.
In this essay, I will not differentiate between works commissioned by the king
and those he collected. As a matter of fact, it is not useful to distinguish between
Frederick as an art collector and as a patron. He always collected works of art for
specific places and stopped collecting once the relevant apartment or palace or
pavilion was filled. Art was acquired for a context or rather, to create a context.
5
Before we look at Frederick's most famous and most important palace,
namely Sanssouci, we first have to turn to his biography, which can be regarded as
a determining feature for virtually all aspects of his patronage.
6
In fact, in his
History of Sexuality, Foucault seems to describe an eighteenth-century type
resembling Frederick most closely. Foucault introduced a set of typical characters,
to mark the change of relationships occurring inside the family and around the
education of children in the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries.
7
All of
them appear in Frederick's immediate environment. There is Frederick's father
Frederick William the so-called `Soldier King' Foucault's `impotent, sadistic,
perverse husband' stern creator of the Prussian army, penurious, one who
collected exceptionally tall young men as soldiers, beat his wife and children, and
demanded love through violence. Next there is his wife Sophie Dorothea,
Foucault's `nervous woman', his `frigid wife, the indifferent mother', who retired
from court as far as possible, presenting Frederick at her own palace his only
access to ordinary late baroque `court culture' and intellectual interests. At the
same time she was strangely indifferent to her son, to the degree that she left him
exposed to his father's violence. Frederick's sister Wilhelmine (plate 25), like her
brother a `precocious and already exhausted child' (in Foucault's words), also
embodies the model of an `hysterical or neurasthenic girl', as one senses
immediately when reading her memoirs.
8
Surrounded by this set of characters
Frederick grew up as can be expected, becoming Foucault's `young homosexual
who rejects marriage or neglects his wife', the latter to an extreme degree. If
Frederick's upbringing is characteristic for his period, his collecting can probably
also serve as a good example of the taste of his time.
FREDERICK II OF PRUSSIA AS ART COLLECTOR AND PATRON
232 Association of Art Historians 2001
Frederick's biography also explains some of his very specific features as a
collector.
9
The formative experience for Frederick and possibly also his family
was the so-called `Katte affair', which occurred when, in 1730, Frederick tried to
flee to England with his lover Hans Herrmann von Katte. The two were caught
and both were sentenced to death for treason. The sentence of Frederick, as crown
prince, was commuted to imprisonment, and he was forced to watch the
execution of his lover. Frederick was set free only when he agreed to marry and to
settle in the provincial town of Rheinsberg, north of Berlin, where he waited for
his father's death in order to ascend to the throne.
Frederick's personal geography as king was also important. The palace in
25 Antoine Pesne, Frederick and His Sister Wilhelmine as Children. Stiftung Preuische
Schlo sser und Ga rten Berlin-Brandenburg, Berlin, Charlottenburg Palace. Photo: Stiftung
Preuische Schlo sser und Ga rten Berlin-Brandenburg/Fotoarchiv.
FREDERICK II OF PRUSSIA AS ART COLLECTOR AND PATRON
Association of Art Historians 2001 233
Berlin full of associations with his youth and his father became of absolutely
minor importance. In 1740, after his accession, Frederick started instead to build
a residence in Charlottenburg, close to but still at a safe distance from the
haunted capital of Berlin.
10
His choice might have been influenced by the fact that
Charlottenburg had been the summer residence of his grandmother Sophie
Charlotte, who was close to him both in her philosophical interest and in her
leanings towards her own sex.
11
Charlottenburg occupied this central place only
briefly, however, for already by 1744 Frederick had started to follow a completely
different strategy, actively turning his attention to one of his most hated places:
the Wu