0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
23 просмотров7 страниц
Some people think that giving financial aid to musical and artistic areas can promote the image of national culture while others claim that it can endanger governmental budget. The belief is that this policy results in inequity between different fields. Meanwhile, it is argued that it is a huge waste of money to increasingly invest in these fields.
Some people think that giving financial aid to musical and artistic areas can promote the image of national culture while others claim that it can endanger governmental budget. The belief is that this policy results in inequity between different fields. Meanwhile, it is argued that it is a huge waste of money to increasingly invest in these fields.
Some people think that giving financial aid to musical and artistic areas can promote the image of national culture while others claim that it can endanger governmental budget. The belief is that this policy results in inequity between different fields. Meanwhile, it is argued that it is a huge waste of money to increasingly invest in these fields.
Some people think that this decision can promote the image of national culture while others claim that it can endanger governmental budget. I strongly agree with the former idea for the following reasons. For - Psychology of individuals and nations - Educational effects - Economic value - Cultural and political benefits Strong tradition Against - Unfair - Waste of money Firstly, the belief is that this policy results in inequity between different fields. Those people who work in education and health care find that their contributions are not appreciated as much as artists and musicians, followed by their declining motivation. Nevertheless, it can hardly be denied that artists have struggled with low salaries over the years, which affects their quality of art and undermines our tradition. No sooner are they given sufficient financial support than they feel indebted to government and try their best to give birth to wonderful creations to glorify the image of their countries. Besides, artistic products are mentally powerful and influential. Surveys have shown that citizens, after enjoying beautiful artworks, find their mind at peace, feel inspired and continue beautifying their tradition through their current jobs. Second, it is argued that it is a huge waste of money to increasingly invest in these fields. Facts have shown while countries like Vietnam are still experiencing financial difficulties and dealing with epidemics, it would be unwise to pour so much into such luxurious fields like arts or music. Nevertheless, a strong tradition is created by a strong economy. Such nations like Korea, America which have seen a significant growth in artistic and entertaining fields have generated a great amount of profit to develop their countries. Furthermore, born and growing up in nations where arts and drama are encouraged, children can deeply learn their cultures at the early age through wonderful works and cultivate their patriotism. Imagine how much country lose when their children have little idea about their origin, culture and others, especially in times of globalization like today. - Patriotism: long yeu nuoc - Unwise: khong khon ngoan, ngu ngoc Art is a crucial part in our life. Some people think that the quality of prize winning art-work is continuously declining its real value while others claim that the true work of art still exists and even more develops . I partly agree with the latter view for the following reasons. Whether the quality of art is declining remains controversial. Some people claim that the economic and educational growth have a positive effect on art while others think that artistic quality is put in danger in the modern world. I strongly disagree with the statement for the following reasons. It is, firstly, believed that the quality of art declines because of economic reason. Some people who want to earn more profit are ready to create sex- arousing or violent works to attract youngsters. Nevertheless, this might be true of a certain group of people who come to art for pure profit. Living in a knowledge-based society like today, people can access art more easily and learn art from different sources, even at the early age, followed by their better understanding of art. In addition, with the living standards being enhanced significantly, people are free from daily worry and bury themselves in rich mental world. By dint of this, more art-works are born and appreciated. Secondly, the argument is that technology undermines the value of art. While artists in the past spent long time and effort creating true art- works, those of today just use technological tools to copy and paste their artistic products. Yet, technology, if used appropriately, actually provides artists with more opportunities to come up with creative ideas. By applying computer tools, artists can produce their cartoon pictures and draw as much as possible. Furthermore, the opinion of people about art changes over the time as a result of social and political factors. Whereas people in the past highly valued cubic pictures, those today put more emphasis on personal display among art- works. Equally important, true art-works are still here to stay. Such products by Picasso and other famous artists show timeless value from humanity, education to nature. In brief, the quality of art does not wane, and in fact, wax in the modern life thanks to better education, economic living and its true value. - Wane: decline - Wax: increase - Cubic: thuoc ve khoi vat the 1. With noun+ verbing/verbed, main clause 2. Verbing clause, main clause, followed by something 3. As result of..........., main clause 4. While clause, main clause 5. No sooner main clause than main clause 6. If clause, main clause 7. When clause, main clause 8. Thanks to verbing, main clause 9.
- Educational - Cultural image - Political - Economic value
- Weaken: undermine - Glorify: rang danh - 1 diem - 2 diem - 5.5-6