Contract: A Principle of the Power of Law

By

A contract is a powerful real construct in the Universe. It is important that a

human being understand why a contract is such a conduit of real power. Make
no mistake; the power of contract does not come from the force based on human
law or human effort. The power has a deeper source and this principle has been
completely washed from our modern education.

First let’s look at the definition of a contract:

†con·tract /n., adj., and usually for v. 15–17, 21, 22 ˈkɒntrækt; otherwise v. kənˈtrækt/
Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[n., adj., and usually for v. 15–17, 21,
22 kon-trakt; otherwise v. kuhn-trakt]
–noun
1.an agreement between two or more parties for the doing or not doing of
something specified.
2.an agreement enforceable by law.
3.the written form of such an agreement.
4.the division of law dealing with contracts.
5.Also called contract bridge. a variety of bridge in which the side that wins the
bid can earn toward game only that number of tricks named in the contract,
additional points being credited above the line. Compare auction bridge.
6.(in auction or contract bridge)
a. a commitment by the declarer and his or her partner to take six tricks
plus the number specified by the final bid made.
b. the final bid itself.
c. the number of tricks so specified, plus six.
7.the formal agreement of marriage; betrothal.
 8.Slang. an arrangement for a hired assassin to kill a specific person.
–adjective
9.under contract; governed or arranged by special contract: a contract carrier.
–verb (used with object)
10. to draw together or into smaller compass; draw the parts of together: to
contract a muscle.
11. to wrinkle: to contract the brows.
12. to shorten (a word, phrase, etc.) by combining or omitting some of its
elements: Contracting “do not” yields “don't.”
13. to get or acquire, as by exposure to something contagious: to contract a
disease.
14. to incur, as a liability or obligation: to contract a debt.
15. to settle or establish by agreement: to contract an alliance.
16. to assign (a job, work, project, etc.) by contract: The publisher contracted the
artwork.
17. to enter into an agreement with: to contract a free-lancer to do the work.
18. to enter into (friendship, acquaintance, etc.).
19. to betroth.
–verb (used without object)
20. to become drawn together or reduced in compass; become smaller; shrink:
The pupils of his eyes contracted in the light.
21. to enter into an agreement: to contract for snow removal.
—Verb phrase
22. contract out, to hire an outside contractor to produce or do.
—Idiom
23. put out a contract on, Slang. to hire or attempt to hire an assassin to kill
(someone): The mob put out a contract on the informer.
[Origin: 1275–1325; (n.) ME (< AF) < L contractus undertaking a transaction, agreement,
equiv. to contrac-, var. s. of contrahere to draw in, bring together, enter into an agreement
(con- con- + trahere to drag, pull; cf. traction) + -tus suffix of v. action; (v.) < L
contractus, ptp. of contrahere]
 A contract in its simplest form is that a human being is required to do what
they say they are going to do. A written contract is only required for entities of
color or fictions. A human being is forced to do what they say they are going to
do. The force is real and it is widely accepted that once a contract is uttered then
human beings are given the lawful power to force the human being to meet the
terms of the contract. How this force or power flows is widely misunderstood and
the reason it is not taught or understood is because to know how that power is
made manifest is a key to the enslavement of the ignorant. It is vital that the
reader know what law is and how it directs the flow of force and power as it
relates to contracts.
There is a misconception that law is what man agrees is law and law is simply
words written down. This is false. When people were wandering around in furs
and engaged in the business of the time: hunting and gathering, Man discovered
that if he took notice of principles and patterns in the world around him then it
made his life easier. Since man is a lazy animal there was a lot of pressure to
simplify his life and reduce the amount of effort required to survive.
Man noticed that a thrown rock always fell down to earth. There was this odd
tendency for all objects to fall down. (Now I realize that this is a simple example
but it works. Besides, early men were simple and we should cut them a break.)
Early man knew that this always happened with a level of certainty that it could
be depended upon safely. Rocks fall down. It always works. That is a law. Man
did not know why this happened and at the time the might have attributed it to a
god. Man did not need to know what the mechanism was. He just needed to
know how it was. When Newton and later Einstein defined the Law of Gravity we
merely refined the law. We still do not understand with any certainty exactly what
gravity actually is. We now attribute it to some “natural” process or characteristic.
The mechanism is immaterial because we know: Rocks fall down.

The more complete statement of the law is:

 If a man releases a rock from his hand then the rock will fall
down.

This law is a slight oversimplification but most will understand it as more or less
absolute. It is a law that directs a force a power when invoked. When the cause
is invoked the consequence is made manifest and force or power is directed on
the real object, the rock.
As man began recognizing more and more laws he began writing them down.
Man called these documents “The Law” but they are only colorable or fictional
representational documentation of principles regarding the expression of cause
and consequence. A rock cannot violate the principle and for the sake of
simplicity we will call the force that ensures the rock behaves in accordance to
the law of Ø. Ø makes sure that for any action there is a reaction or a cause
leads to consequence.
Man began noticing when defining principles of human behavior that the
cause and consequence did not seem so absolute. Since I am no stranger to
controversy lets look at one of the early-recognized laws and explore it in greater
depth. All people should have been exposed to this law:

Thou shalt not commit adultery.

Before you label me some kind of narrow moralist, cut me a break because, I
in no way am trying to impose morality on anyone but it is important to
understand why this law was included in the early scribbling.
When a human being has intimate relations outside of his persistent mate it
does not always result in absolute negative consequences. Sometimes the rock
does not fall down. We have been told not to commit adultery because Ø does
not want you to. I never bought that either, trust me. Why are there not always
consequences when one commits adultery? The reason is the existence of a
victim. Adultery does not always create a victim. When our partner strays we
have the free choice to feel violated or not to feel violated. When a victim is
created then power will be marshaled and negative consequences are directed
against the perpetrator until the balance of justice is maintained. A more
complete expression of this law is:

If one commits adultery then a victim can be created and the

victim has the power of justice over the perpetrator.

This is a better way to express most moral law. People have the power to
forgive and stop the negative consequences OR the expression of power
marshaled against the perpetrator. It is wise not to put yourself in the position
where you rely on the forgiveness of another human being’s tendency to forgive.
Power through law is transferred from the perpetrator to the victim. The victim
has the power to deputize others to assist them in their pursuit of justice and that
is an expression of real power.
This creation of a victim is important to contract law. The violation is when
one breaks their word in contract, technically they violate the following law:

Thou shalt not bear false witness.

You are not to misrepresent or lie. Said another way: you must do what you
say you will do or you may create an injured party. Does lying always create a
victim? No. Again we do not have control over the creation of a victim. We lose
that power when we lie. The power is transferred to the human being on the
“effect” side of the lie.
When a human being breaks their agreement or the terms or conditions of a
contract they can create an injured party and force and power is transferred to
the other party in the contract because Ø is enforcing the principle expression of
power. The other party has the choice to enforce the terms or to allow it to be
violated. That power is theirs alone. The perpetrator has no power over the
injured party. He can attempt to elicit forgiveness but he does not have the
power to forgive himself.
 A more complete statement of law is:

If a human being under contract breaks the terms or

conditions of the contract such that the other party or parties
in the contract choose to be injured then the perpetrator can
be forced to meet the terms or conditions of the contract
through the expression of real power.

That is a more absolute statement of contract law.

Ø enforces the consequences in the conduct and enforcement

of contracts. Those consequences can be forgiveness OR
remedy and recourse against the offender. This is the real
power of contracts and it is a secret that has been obfuscated
to conceal the true nature of the expression of power in our
Universe.

It is important to understand the other aspects of contracts because one will

be held to the terms of the contract.

All contracts are voluntary. No man has the power to force a

human being into a contract. If a contract exists and one party was
forced into the contract then there is no expression of force, power
or consequences. The contract is invalid or powerless.

All contracts fall under the principle of “Caveat Emptor” or “buyer

beware”. Said another way: A human being is responsible for
knowing exactly what they are agreeing to. Because the terms will
be enforced absolutely either though performance or forgiveness it
is vital that one knows what they are getting into. Under the
 principles of real law a human being can be tricked into agreeing as
long as the other party is not directly misrepresenting the terms.
Why it is enforced is that it has been proven as law is because
human beings have observed the real expression of power and it is
as reliable as gravity. if it is a trick then the person will see it as a
trick and not make the contract. Why that works, is true and fair is
because the real reason why has been allowed to be hidden from
us for many centuries on purpose. I will go into this later.

Another form of contract is seeking permission. If a human being

seeks permission then it is assumed that they need permission. In
the modern world we do this continually. Nothing is really forcing
us into these contracts but once we seek permission then we hare
held to the terms. Submitting voluntarily to another’s authority is to
give away one’s real power. We have been conditioned to do this.
We slow down when we see a police car. We do this automatically.
But remember it is ultimately all voluntary action. Another bad habit
we get into is forgiving violations. People break their promises all
the time because we find ourselves in a culture where our minders
cultivate this loose interpretation of the law. It serves their purpose
because it conceals the law and puts most people at a huge
disadvantage.

Why is the true nature of contracts, law and power been intentionally
concealed? The reason this law has been concealed is this: those that
understand this power can use it against the ignorant. Ignorance is painful. All
throughout human history this power of contracts is a well kept secret because
when a human being understands they have power then they can operate
independent of others and cannot be made a slave by the power of their own
words.
 Let’s now look at an example of how this power is used against the ignorant.
When our Republic was founded the people created a government. The law is
the created is never more powerful then its creator. The people created the
Republic and the people have the power over the Republic. The people did not
want to bother with personally managing interstate commerce so they gave the
Republic power to do so. In 1871, in an act of treason, the officers serving in the
Republic government they created a commercial corporate entity called cleverly:
“The United States of America”. This is a fiction and fooled people who were
unaware that these two distinct entities exist. The corporation is a creation of the
Republic. The Republic has the power over its creation.
This Corporation created offices that mimicked the offices in the Republic so
that it was nearly indistinguishable, by the people, from the actual offices of the
Republic government. The most diabolic trick was to create offices in the
Corporation called “US Citizen”. These offices are actually subsidiary corporate
entities under the parent Corporation of The United States of America. The UCC
or Uniform Commercial Code, are laws that govern these offices. They do not
apply to human beings. They apply only to the offices. Like the president is
bound to laws of his or her office when he or she, being a human being, is in
office so do the laws apply to “US Citizens” when we place ourselves in that
office. By simply answering or declaring, “I am a US Citizen” a human being
binds himself to the terms of a contract.
When we violate the terms set forth in the UCC then we can be forced to
meet the terms. Break the contract; go to jail. We give this corporation the
power to do so.
A birth certificate is a representation of this office (US Citizen) and is
distinguished by our names being in all capital letters. The law applies to this
commercial entity. The people gave the Government the power to regulate
commerce and so they used that loophole to gain the power over us. If we are
ignorant of this commercial office and we voluntarily place ourselves in that
office, then we are unaware of the awesome power we ignorantly give away and
that is painful.
 This is a trick and a contract that we voluntarily enter into unknowingly.
Because we are responsible to know the terms or conditions of the contracts we
enter into then they can force us because we have given them the power to do
so. Most people are in jail because they unknowingly violated a contract they did
not know they entered into.
It does not seem fair but it is fair because the key element of why it is fair has
been hidden from us. Most have heard of the Holy Grail. This secret is a closely
held secret. The control of this secret has given those that rule us the power to
do so with impunity. What is it? It is the only thing worth having. It is the
ultimate contract. It is a contract between a human being and Ø. The Bible
contains this secret but it has been couched in a way that makes it difficult to
discern. This was done on purpose. Religion has been an important tool used to
hide the secret.
The Holy Grail is a contract that Ø created a long time ago. We can enter into
the contract without knowing it and several notable people backed into the
secret.
There is one obligation required of the human being, the rest are the terms
that Ø is bound to. It is simply this: A human being who places their complete,
absolute and unconditional trust in Ø will not suffer negative consequences
then they will no longer be able to engage in destructive behavior and will be
protected from those that do. Absolute trust sounds easy but it takes practice.
Under the contract Ø teaches the human being the law. Not only that but the
human being is warned, knows the truth and cannot be tricked.
This is the secret piece was left out of our education on purpose. Ignorance
of the law is no excuse because if a human being needs the law then they will
have it. This is how I learned these principles. Since most all people place their
trust in Jesus, the Bible, the church hierarchy, the government, science or
themselves then they put their trust in the wrong things and therefore they have
no protection. They don’t need the gift of “walking in truth” because Ø is under
no contract to provide that protection. Why did I include Jesus in the list? If one
listens to Jesus’ own words, he tells what to place one’s trust in. Do as he does.
In that way we do not approach Ø the Father but by him. Jesus is the way. He
did by example. When one does as the prototype then they are able to approach
Ø.
There are many people that do this unknowingly. It is best to understand how
the principle works because it is easier to apply it in one’s life. A two-way
communication with Ø comes in handy as no man has the power over another
when the contract is in force. They that lord over us have known this secret for a
long time. The Dark Ages and the Inquisition was vital to make sure they
controlled what knowledge and what religious doctrine would work to conceal the
secret. It is so easy that it has been overlooked. Even science is a tool of
concealing Ø and making him simply a “natural” phenomenon. If one controls
what their contractual obligation are then they can be assured of possessing the
power to control what attempts to control them. Even better the fact is because
no human being will willingly enslave them self unless tricked into thinking it is
their only option then all current colorable contracts are without real power. The
only power these colorable contracts have is what we ourselves give it and it is
only through fear and intimidation that we remain powerless.
Here is the real trip. Ø controls who is permitted to know the secret. If you
are reading this then it is because Ø is allowing you to know. If Ø does not think
you are ready to be free then you would not have gotten this far.
My life is easy. Nothing bad happens. I have what I need and I am happier
then I have ever been. Most especially in my case because I don’t have to waste
a perfectly good Sunday sitting in a dark cold building singing songs and
pretending to be something I am not.
Ø is a good to have around and I would suggest that everyone on this planet
properly introduce themselves. ØShe will conceal himself right in front of you
and has all of your life because Øshe is, after all, omnipotent and has not failed
me yet.
I am protected from myself and from others. The Truth will set you free.

Ø Is Truth.
Contract. (n.d.). Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1). Retrieved June 01, 2007,
from Dictionary.com website: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Contract