(Redirected from Hedonist) For other uses, see Hedonism (disambiguation). Part of a series on Hedonism Thinkers[show] Schools of hedonism[show] Key concepts[show] Related articles[show] v t e Hedonism is a school of thought that argues that pleasure is the primary or most important intrinsic good.[1] In very simple terms, a hedonist strives to maximi ze net pleasure (pleasure minus pain). Ethical hedonism is the idea that all people have the right to do everything in their power to achieve the greatest amount of pleasure possible to them, assumin g that their actions do not infringe on the equal rights of others. It is also t he idea that every person's pleasure should far surpass their amount of pain. Et hical hedonism is said to have been started by Aristippus of Cyrene, a student o f Socrates. He held the idea that pleasure is the highest good.[2] Contents [hide] 1 Etymology 2 History of development 2.1 Sumerian civilization 2.2 Ancient Egypt 2.3 Carvaka 2.4 Classic schools of antiquity 2.4.1 The Cyrenaic school 2.4.2 Epicureanism 2.5 Greek Mythology 2.6 Mohism 2.7 Christian hedonism 2.8 Utilitarianism 2.9 Contemporary approaches 2.9.1 Michel Onfray 2.9.2 Abolitionism 3 Criticisms 4 See also 5 Further reading 6 References 7 External links Etymology[edit] The name derives from the Greek word for "delight" (?d???s?? hedonismos from ?d?? ? hedone "pleasure", cognate with English sweet + suffix -?s?? -ismos "ism"). History of development[edit] Sumerian civilization[edit] In the original Old Babylonian version of the Epic of Gilgamesh, which was writt en soon after the invention of writing, Siduri gave the following advice "Fill y our belly. Day and night make merry. Let days be full of joy. Dance and make mus ic day and night [...] These things alone are the concern of men", which may rep resent the first recorded advocacy of a hedonistic philosophy.[3] Ancient Egypt[edit] Scenes of a harper entertaining guests at a feast was common in ancient Egyptian tombs (see Harper's Songs), and sometimes contained hedonistic elements, callin g guests to submit to pleasure because they cannot be sure that they will be rew arded for good with a blissful afterlife. The following is a song attributed to the reign of one of the Intef kings before or after the 12th dynasty, and the te xt was used in the eighteenth and nineteenth dynasties.[4][5] Let thy desire flourish, In order to let thy heart forget the beatifications for thee. Follow thy desire, as long as thou shalt live. Put myrrh upon thy head and clothing of fine linen upon thee, Being anointed with genuine marvels of the gods' property. Set an increase to thy good things; Let not thy heart flag. Follow thy desire and thy good. Fulfill thy needs upon earth, after the command of thy heart, Until there come for thee that day of mourning. Carvaka[edit] Main article: Carvaka Carvaka was an Indian hedonist school of thought that arose approximately 600 BC , and died out in the 14th century CE. The Carvakas maintained that the Hindu sc riptures are false, that the priests are liars, and that there is no afterlife, and that pleasure should be the aim of living. Unlike other Indian schools of ph ilosophy, the Carvakas argued that there is nothing wrong with sensual indulgenc e. They held a naturalistic worldview. They believed that perception is the only source of knowledge. Classic schools of antiquity[edit] Democritus seems to be the earliest philosopher on record to have categorically embraced a hedonistic philosophy; he called the supreme goal of life "contentmen t" or "cheerfulness", claiming that "joy and sorrow are the distinguishing mark of things beneficial and harmful" (DK 68 B 188).[6] The Cyrenaic school[edit] Main article: Cyrenaics Aristippus of Cyrene The Cyrenaics were an ultra-hedonist Greek school of philosophy founded in the 4 th century BC, supposedly by Aristippus of Cyrene, although many of the principl es of the school are believed to have been formalized by his grandson of the sam e name, Aristippus the Younger. The school was so called after Cyrene, the birth place of Aristippus. It was one of the earliest Socratic schools. The Cyrenaics taught that the only intrinsic good is pleasure, which meant not just the absenc e of pain, but positively enjoyable sensations. Of these, momentary pleasures, e specially physical ones, are stronger than those of anticipation or memory. They did, however, recognize the value of social obligation, and that pleasure could be gained from altruism[citation needed]. Theodorus the Atheist was a latter ex ponent of hedonism who was a disciple of younger Aristippus,[7] while becoming w ell known for expounding atheism. The school died out within a century, and was replaced by Epicureanism. The Cyrenaics were known for their skeptical theory of knowledge. They reduced l ogic to a basic doctrine concerning the criterion of truth.[8] They thought that we can know with certainty our immediate sense-experiences (for instance, that I am having a sweet sensation now) but can know nothing about the nature of the objects that cause these sensations (for instance, that the honey is sweet).[9] They also denied that we can have knowledge of what the experiences of other peo ple are like.[10] All knowledge is immediate sensation. These sensations are mot ions which are purely subjective, and are painful, indifferent or pleasant, acco rding as they are violent, tranquil or gentle.[9][11] Further they are entirely individual, and can in no way be described as constituting absolute objective kn owledge. Feeling, therefore, is the only possible criterion of knowledge and of conduct.[9] Our ways of being affected are alone knowable. Thus the sole aim for everyone should be pleasure. Cyrenaicism deduces a single, universal aim for all people which is pleasure. Fu rthermore, all feeling is momentary and homogeneous. It follows that past and fu ture pleasure have no real existence for us, and that among present pleasures th ere is no distinction of kind.[11] Socrates had spoken of the higher pleasures o f the intellect; the Cyrenaics denied the validity of this distinction and said that bodily pleasures, being more simple and more intense, were preferable.[12] Momentary pleasure, preferably of a physical kind, is the only good for humans. However some actions which give immediate pleasure can create more than their eq uivalent of pain. The wise person should be in control of pleasures rather than be enslaved to them, otherwise pain will result, and this requires judgement to evaluate the different pleasures of life.[13] Regard should be paid to law and c ustom, because even though these things have no intrinsic value on their own, vi olating them will lead to unpleasant penalties being imposed by others.[12] Like wise, friendship and justice are useful because of the pleasure they provide.[12 ] Thus the Cyrenaics believed in the hedonistic value of social obligation and a ltruistic behaviour. Epicureanism[edit] Main articles: Epicureanism and Epicurus Epicureanism is a system of philosophy based upon the teachings of Epicurus (c. 341c. 270 BC), founded around 307 BC. Epicurus was an atomic materialist, followi ng in the steps of Democritus and Leucippus. His materialism led him to a genera l stance against superstition or the idea of divine intervention. Following Aris tippusabout whom very little is knownEpicurus believed that the greatest good was to seek modest, sustainable "pleasure" in the form of a state of tranquility and freedom from fear (ataraxia) and absence of bodily pain (aponia) through knowle dge of the workings of the world and the limits of our desires. The combination of these two states is supposed to constitute happiness in its highest form. Alt hough Epicureanism is a form of hedonism, insofar as it declares pleasure as the sole intrinsic good, its conception of absence of pain as the greatest pleasure and its advocacy of a simple life make it different from "hedonism" as it is co mmonly understood. Epicurus In the Epicurean view, the highest pleasure (tranquility and freedom from fear) was obtained by knowledge, friendship and living a virtuous and temperate life. He lauded the enjoyment of simple pleasures, by which he meant abstaining from b odily desires, such as sex and appetites, verging on asceticism. He argued that when eating, one should not eat too richly, for it could lead to dissatisfaction later, such as the grim realization that one could not afford such delicacies i n the future. Likewise, sex could lead to increased lust and dissatisfaction wit h the sexual partner. Epicurus did not articulate a broad system of social ethic s that has survived but had a unique version of the Golden Rule. It is impossible to live a pleasant life without living wisely and well and just ly (agreeing "neither to harm nor be harmed"[14]), and it is impossible to live wisely and well and justly without living a pleasant life.[15] Epicureanism was originally a challenge to Platonism, though later it became the main opponent of Stoicism. Epicurus and his followers shunned politics. After t he death of Epicurus, his school was headed by Hermarchus; later many Epicurean societies flourished in the Late Hellenistic era and during the Roman era (such as those in Antiochia, Alexandria, Rhodes and Ercolano). The poet Lucretius is i ts most known Roman proponent. By the end of the Roman Empire, having undergone Christian attack and repression, Epicureanism had all but died out, and would be resurrected in the 17th century by the atomist Pierre Gassendi, who adapted it to the Christian doctrine. Some writings by Epicurus have survived. Some scholars consider the epic poem On the Nature of Things by Lucretius to present in one unified work the core argum ents and theories of Epicureanism. Many of the papyrus scrolls unearthed at the Villa of the Papyri at Herculaneum are Epicurean texts. At least some are though t to have belonged to the Epicurean Philodemus. Greek Mythology[edit] The Greek god Dionysus, could be considered the Greek embodiment of Hedonism. Mohism[edit] Main article: Mohism Mohism was a philosophical school of thought founded by Mozi in the 5th century BC. It paralleled the utilitarianism later developed by English thinkers. As Con fucianism became the preferred philosophy of later Chinese dynasties, starting f rom the Emperor Wu of Han, Mohism and other non-Confucian philosophical schools of thought were suppressed.[citation needed] Christian hedonism[edit] Main article: Christian hedonism Christian hedonism is a controversial Christian doctrine current in some evangel ical circles, particularly those of the Reformed tradition.[16] Christian Hedoni sm may describe the theology of Jonathan Edwards.[17] In the 17th century, the a tomist Pierre Gassendi adapted Epicureanism to the Christian doctrine. Utilitarianism[edit] Main article: Utilitarianism Utilitarianism addresses problems with moral motivation neglected by Kantianism by giving a central role to happiness. It is an ethical theory holding that the proper course of action is the one that maximizes the overall "good" of the soci ety.[18] It is thus one form of consequentialism, meaning that the moral worth o f an action is determined by its resulting outcome. The most influential contrib utors to this theory are considered to be the 18th and 19th-century British phil osophers Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. Conjoining hedonismas a view as to what is good for peopleto utilitarianism has the result that all action should be directed toward achieving the greatest total amount of happiness (see Hedonic c alculus). Though consistent in their pursuit of happiness, Bentham and Mill's ve rsions of hedonism differ. There are two somewhat basic schools of thought on he donism:[1] One school, grouped around Bentham, defends a quantitative approach. Bentham bel ieved that the value of a pleasure could be quantitatively understood. Essential ly, he believed the value of pleasure to be its intensity multiplied by its dura tion - so it was not just the number of pleasures, but their intensity and how l ong they lasted that must be taken into account. Other proponents, like Mill, argue a qualitative approach. Mill believed that th ere can be different levels of pleasure - higher quality pleasure is better than lower quality pleasure. Mill also argues that simpler beings (he often refers t o pigs) have an easier access to the simpler pleasures; since they do not see ot her aspects of life, they can simply indulge in their lower pleasures. The more elaborate beings tend to spend more thought on other matters and hence lessen th e time for simple pleasure. It is therefore more difficult for them to indulge i n such "simple pleasures" in the same manner. Contemporary approaches[edit] Contemporary proponents of hedonism include Swedish philosopher Torbjrn Tnnsj[19] a nd Fred Feldman.[20] Michel Onfray[edit] Main article: Michel Onfray Michel Onfray, contemporary hedonist philosopher A dedicated contemporary hedonist philosopher and writer on the history of hedon istic thought is the French Michel Onfray. He has written two books directly on the subject (L'invention du plaisir : fragments cyraniques[21] and La puissance d 'exister : Manifeste hdoniste[22]). He defines hedonism "as an introspective atti tude to life based on taking pleasure yourself and pleasuring others, without ha rming yourself or anyone else."[23] "Onfray's philosophical project is to define an ethical hedonism, a joyous utilitarianism, and a generalized aesthetic of se nsual materialism that explores how to use the brain's and the body's capacities to their fullest extent -- while restoring philosophy to a useful role in art, politics, and everyday life and decisions."[24] Onfray's works "have explored the philosophical resonances and components of (an d challenges to) science, painting, gastronomy, sex and sensuality, bioethics, w ine, and writing. His most ambitious project is his projected six-volume Counter -history of Philosophy,"[24] of which three have been published. For him "In opp osition to the ascetic ideal advocated by the dominant school of thought, hedoni sm suggests identifying the highest good with your own pleasure and that of othe rs; the one must never be indulged at the expense of sacrificing the other. Obta ining this balance my pleasure at the same time as the pleasure of others presum es that we approach the subject from different angles political, ethical, aesthe tic, erotic, bioethical, pedagogical, historiographical." For this he has "written books on each of these facets of the same world view."[ 25] His philosophy aims "for "micro-revolutions, " or revolutions of the individ ual and small groups of like-minded people who live by his hedonistic, libertari an values."[26] Abolitionism[edit] Main articles: Abolitionism (bioethics) and David Pearce (philosopher) The Abolitionist Society is a transhumanist group calling for the abolition of s uffering in all sentient life through the use of advanced biotechnology. Their c ore philosophy is negative utilitarianism. David Pearce is a theorist of this pe rspective and he believes and promotes the idea that there exists a strong ethic al imperative for humans to work towards the abolition of suffering in all senti ent life. His book-length internet manifesto The Hedonistic Imperative[27] outli nes how technologies such as genetic engineering, nanotechnology, pharmacology, and neurosurgery could potentially converge to eliminate all forms of unpleasant experience among human and non-human animals, replacing suffering with gradient s of well-being, a project he refers to as "paradise engineering".[28] A transhu manist and a vegan,[29] Pearce believes that we (or our future posthuman descend ants) have a responsibility not only to avoid cruelty to animals within human so ciety but also to alleviate the suffering of animals in the wild. Criticisms[edit] There is a critical point where the value of hedonistic properties is affected b y actual age and the depreciation schedule turns upward.[citation needed] It is argued that if social constructionism is going to come to grips with moral ity and agency, it must abandon explanations that invoke the necessary causation of metaphysical abstractions such as hedonism.[30] See also[edit] Affectionism Hedonistic relevance Libertinism Paradox of hedonism Pleasure principle (psychology) Psychological hedonism Further reading[edit] Fred Feldman (2006). Pleasure and the Good Life: Concerning the Nature, Varietie s, and Plausibility of Hedonism. Oxford University Press. Fred Feldman (1997). Utilitarianism, Hedonism, and Desert: Essays in Moral Philo sophy. Cambridge University Press Fred Feldman (2010). What Is This Thing Called Happiness?. Oxford University Pre ss Michel Onfray (2002). L'invention du plaisir : fragments cyraniques. Le Livre de Poche. Michel Onfray (2006). La puissance d'exister : Manifeste hdoniste. Grasset & Fasq uelle David Pearce. The Hedonistic Imperative Torbjrn Tnnsj (1998). Hedonistic Utilitarianism. Edinburgh University Press References[edit] Notes ^ Jump up to: a b Hedonism, 2004-04-20 Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Jump up ^ Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics 6. p. 567. Jump up ^ ????? ???????? (2012). "?????? ??? ???????? ? ???????????: ??? ??????? ??????? ?? ???????????????? ??????". ?2. ????????? ?????????. pp. 184185. Missin g or empty |title= (help) Jump up ^ Wilson, John A. (1969). "Egyptian Secular Songs and Poems". Ancient Ne ar Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. p. 467. Jump up ^ ????? ???????? (2012). "?????? ??? ???????? ? ???????????: ??? ??????? ??????? ?? ???????????????? ??????". ?2. ????????? ?????????. p. 185. Missing o r empty |title= (help) Jump up ^ p. 125, C.C.W. Taylor, "Democritus", in C. Rowe & M. Schofield (eds.), Greek and Roman Political Thought, Cambridge 2005. Jump up ^ Diogenes Lartius, ii. 86 Jump up ^ Reale & Catan 1986, p. 274 ^ Jump up to: a b c Copleston 2003, p. 121 Jump up ^ Reale & Catan 1986, pp. 2745 ^ Jump up to: a b Annas 1995, p. 230 ^ Jump up to: a b c Annas 1995, p. 231 Jump up ^ Copleston 2003, p. 122 Jump up ^ Tim O'Keefe, Epicurus on Freedom, Cambridge University Press, 2005, p. 134 Jump up ^ Epicurus Principal Doctrines tranls. by Robert Drew Hicks (1925) Jump up ^ Christian Hedonism Forgive the Label, But Don't Miss the Truth - Desir ing God Jump up ^ Jonathan Edwards, A treatise concerning religious affections (Dublin: J. Ogle, 1812)[1](accessed on Google Book on July 26, 2009) Jump up ^ , Salters-Nuffield Advanced Biology for Edexcel A2 Biology 2009. Jump up ^ Torbjrn Tnnsj; Hedonistic Utilitarianism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press (1998). Jump up ^ Fred Feldman(2006). Pleasure and the Good Life: Concerning the Nature, Varieties, and Plausibility of Hedonism. Oxford University Press and (1997). Ut ilitarianism, Hedonism, and Desert: Essays in Moral Philosophy. Cambridge Univer sity Press Jump up ^ http://www.amazon.es/Linvention-plaisir-Fragments-cyr%C3%A9na%C3%AFque s-Biblio/dp/2253943231 Jump up ^ http://www.amazon.fr/gp/product/2290054526/ref=pd_lpo_sbs_dp_ss_2?pf_r d_p=479289967&pf_rd_s=lpo-top-stripe&pf_rd_t=201&pf_rd_i=2253083976&pf_rd_m=A1X6 FK5RDHNB96&pf_rd_r=055JCMT72GK8V673HPSR Jump up ^ http://newhumanist.org.uk/1421 "Atheism la mode" ^ Jump up to: a b Introductory Note to Onfray by Doug Ireland Jump up ^ Michel Onfray: A philosopher of the Enlightenment Jump up ^ France, Media, Michel Onfray, A self labeled Anarchist Jump up ^ "The Hedonistic Imperative". Jump up ^ "The Genomic Bodhisattva". H+ Magazine. 2009-09-16. Retrieved 2011-11- 16. Jump up ^ "Criao animal intensiva. Um outro Holocausto?". Revista do Instituto Hum anitas Unisinos. 2011. Jump up ^ Gantt, Edwin. "Social constructionism and the ethics of hedonism". US: Division 24 of the American Psychological Association, the Division of Theoreti cal and Philosophical Psychology. Sources Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Hedonism". Encyclopdia Britannica (11th ed.). Cambr idge University Press. External links[edit] Look up hedonism in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry Manifesto of the Hedonist International Wikisource-logo.svg Grace Neal Dolson (1920). "Hedonism". Encyclopedia Americana . The Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics, volume 6, page 567 [show] v t e Philosophy Categories: HedonismMotivationUtilitarianismEthical theoriesPhilosophical moveme nts Navigation menu Create accountLog inArticleTalkReadEditView history Main page Contents Featured content Current events Random article Donate to Wikipedia Wikimedia Shop Interaction Help About Wikipedia Community portal Recent changes Contact page Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Wikidata item Cite this page Print/export Create a book Download as PDF Printable version Languages ??????? Az?rbaycanca ?????????? ????????? Bosanski Catal Cetina Dansk Deutsch Eesti Espaol Esperanto Euskara ????? Franais ?? ??? ??????? Hrvatski Ido Bahasa Indonesia slenska Italiano ????? Basa Jawa ??????? ???????? Latina Latvieu Lietuviu Magyar Bahasa Melayu Nederlands ??? Norsk bokml Occitan O?zbekcha Polski Portugus Romna ??????? Shqip Simple English Slovencina ?????? / srpski Srpskohrvatski / ?????????????? Suomi Svenska ????? ???????/tatara Trke ?????????? ?? Edit links This page was last modified on 31 October 2014 at 21:26. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; add itional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and P rivacy Policy. Wikipedia is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, I nc., a non-profit organization.