Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
54
04 November 2014
In collaboration with
Proudly supported by
Issue 54
04 November 2014
Modis
swearing
in
on
the
26th
of
May,
2014
announced
a
new
chapter
in
Indias
regional
and
international
relations.
As
stated
in
the
Bharatiya
Janta
Partys
manifesto,
the
new
government
looks
to
reboot
and
reorient
the
foreign
policy
goals,
content
and
process,
in
a
manner
that
leads
to
an
economically
stronger
India,
and
where
its
voice
is
heard
in
the
international
fora.
In
other
words,
the
government
is
aiming
to
expand
Indias
reach
and
impact
on
the
economic,
social,
cultural,
scientific,
and
political
avenues
of
the
world
-
they
wish
to
announce
India,
so
to
speak.
India
has
a
long
history
of
collaboration
with
several
countries
and
is
considered
a
leader
of
the
developing
world
-
this
and
its
growing
international
influence
can
give
it
a
more
prominent
voice
in
global
affairs.
Keeping
this
in
mind
over
the
last
4
months,
the
new
Indian
prime
minister
has
made
official
visits
to
Nepal,
Bhutan,
Japan
and
the
United
States
of
America.
He
attended
the
BRICs
conference
in
Brazil
where
he
met
the
Russian
president,
he
gave
his
maiden
speech
at
the
United
Nations
General
assembly
in
America
and
he
invited
all
the
heads
of
the
members
of
SAARC
to
his
inauguration
ceremony.
Within
100
days
of
the
formation
of
the
new
government,
Sushma
Swaraj
the
minister
for
External
Affairs
has
also
made
official
visits
to
Dhaka,
Bangladesh,
Kathmandu,
Nepal,
Naypyidaw,
Myanmar,
Singapore,
Hanoi,
Vietnam,
Manama,
Bahrain,
Kabul,
Afghanistan,
Dushanbe,
Tajikistan,
New
York,
Washington,
D.C.
and
London.
Moreover,
soon
after
the
new
government
took
over,
important
world
leaders
expressed
their
willingness
to
work
with
Modi
to
strengthen
their
relations
with
India.
In
fact,
all
5
permanent
member
states
of
the
United
Nations
Security
Council
have
already
sent
their
envoys
to
India,
to
this
effect.
The
Hindustan
Times
reads,
"Mr.
Modi's
foreign
policy
over
the
past
three
months
has
been
marked
by
three
distinctive
traits
-
warmth
and
close
engagement
with
smaller
South
Asian
neighbours;
reconciliation
followed
by
a
tougher
stance
vis-a-vis
Pakistan;
and
multi-layered
engagement
with
the
big
powers".
But
what
does
all
of
this
truly
mean
for
India,
how
do
these
so
called
official
visits
impact
India
and
its
economy?
Well
for
starters,
this
new
stability
in
foreign
relations
works
to
increase
Indias
credibility
as
a
market
and
has
already
attracted
over
$40
billion
in
foreign
investments.
Also,
ahead
of
the
arrivals
of
their
representatives
in
India,
countries
like
Sri
Lanka,
Pakistan
and
Bangladesh
have
freed
Indian
prisoners
in
good
faith.
Issue 54
04 November 2014
The
exposure
that
India
gets
at
these
global
platforms
essentially
promotes
India,
selling
it
as
a
viable
market
option
for
both,
countries
and
companies.
To
add
to
this
the
increased
quality
of
this
exposure
changes
the
traditional
views
on
India
and
brings
other
nations
up
to
speed
with
Indias
transformation
since
the
snake
charmers
days.
Consequently,
investors
have
started
to
look
at
India
as
a
great
new
project,
one
with
enough
skills
and
resources
to
develop
into
a
truly
great
nation.
Moreover,
establishing
new
relations
and
reworking
old
ones
have
earned
India
a
sort
of
welfare
vote
which
allows
Indian
embassies
at
countries
like
Libya,
Iran
and
Iraq
to
provide
safety
and
security
facilities
to
the
Indian
nationals
living
there.
It
also
opens
up
several
opportunities
for
the
Indian
youth
in
a
global
environment
and
on
a
whole,
it
boosts
Indias
growth
and
development
as
an
economy.
In
conclusion,
the
government
still
has
some
work
to
do
specially
in
the
defence
department.
The
national
border
issues
with
Pakistan
and
China
that
have
been
going
on
ever
since
Indias
independence
need
to
be
resolved
rather
than
just
being
managed.
However,
it
is
worth
acknowledging
that
this
new
government
seems
to
have
taken
the
right
steps
as
far
as
the
Ministry
of
External
Affairs
is
concerned.
In
a
short
time,
they
have
managed
to
remodel
Indias
international
relations
structure
so
that
it
is
more
relevant
and
comprehensible.
And
most
importantly,
there
are
evidences
of
the
efforts
being
made,
along
with
trends
that
are
now
emerging
to
point
towards
a
very
favourable
future
for
India.
Issue 54
04 November 2014
References
l
l
BBC
Monitoring,
Indian
media:
Modis
100
days
in
power.
(2014,
Sept
2)
retrieved
from
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-29026072
Akhilesh
Pillalamarri,
What
did
Narendra
Modis
US
trip
accomplish?
(2014,
Oct
2)
as
reported
by
The
Diplomat:
know
the
Asia
Pacific,
retrieved
from
http://thediplomat.com/2014/10/what-did-narendra-modis-us-trip-
accomplish/
Cleo
Pascal,
Will
Modis
India
reinvent
international
relations?
(2014,
May
30)
as
reported
by
The
Huffington
Post,
retrieved
from
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/cleo-paskal/will-modis-india-reinvent_b_5412886.html
Issue 54
04 November 2014
The
answer
to
the
question
Would
you
say
capitalism
is
a
successful
system?
is
one
that
seems
obvious
at
face
value.
The
past
century
has
seen
the
fall
of
the
centrally
planned
Soviet
Union
and
the
rise
of
capitalist
America.
Yet,
the
answer
to
that
question
is
being
challenged
today
by
a
phenomenon
that
presents
an
uncomfortable
problem
for
anyone
concerned
with
governance
and
national
strategy
the
phenomenon
of
inequality.
The
extent
of
this
problem
is
illustrated
clearly
by
this
chart:
This
chart
shows
the
growth
in
income
for
the
bottom
90%
in
the
US
(in
light
blue)
and
the
top
10%
(in
dark
blue).
As
the
years
went
by,
the
top
10%
has
experienced
and
increase
in
income
growth,
while
the
income
growth
of
the
remaining
90%
has
gone
the
opposite
direction.
It
is
an
oft-held
view
that
inequality
is
a
healthy
phenomenon
which
is
a
natural
by-product
of
capitalism.
Indeed,
inequality
does
play
a
part
in
motivating
those
who
earn
lower
incomes
to
work
harder
and
increase
their
productivity.
However,
high
levels
of
income
inequality
is
certainly
a
major
economic
and
social
problem
which
may
end
catastrophically
like
it
did
in
Russia,
when
workers
rose
up
against
the
Czar
and
his
family
in
the
Russian
Revolution
of
1917.
Issue 54
04 November 2014
One
of
the
most
commonly-suggested
solutions
to
the
problem
of
inequality
is
increased
taxation
on
the
wealthy.
This
can
be
done
through
taxes
on
income,
wealth
and
consumption
among
others.
The
idea
is
that
this
money
can
be
returned
to
the
less
well-off
by
means
of
welfare
spending.
While
Robin
Hood-style
policies
may
be
popular
with
the
general
populace,
the
rich
will
naturally
try
to
prevent
them
through
methods
such
as
lobbying
and
campaign
financing.
This
is
a
problem
inherent
with
unpopular
policies
it
is
hard
to
win
elections
on
a
platform
promising
more
taxes,
especially
if
those
affected
by
such
policies
have
the
power
to
influence
these
elections.
In
addition,
taxes
add
to
business
costs
and
can
discourage
business
activity.
Recently,
Burger
King
made
plans
to
merge
with
Tim
Hortons
in
Canada
to
avoid
the
USAs
higher
taxes.
This
example
highlights
a
key
consequence
of
raising
taxes
-
they
encourage
corporations
and
the
wealthy
to
move
their
wealth
and
investments
out
of
the
country,
in
turn
leading
to
reduced
economic
growth,
lower
wages
and
higher
unemployment.
In
fact,
some
economists
advocate
lowering
taxes
to
get
firms
to
step
up
production
and
hiring
as
this
reduces
unemployment.
Another
way
to
reduce
inequality
is
through
policies
focused
on
giving
more
to
the
poor
as
opposed
to
taxing
the
wealthy.
This
can
be
achieved
through
various
policy
tools
such
as
healthcare
subsidies
as
well
as
scholarships
to
ease
the
financial
burdens
of
the
needy.
These
policies
will
eventually
help
to
reduce
the
entrenched
income
gap
present
in
society
today.
Issue 54
04 November 2014
Economists
have
asserted
that
even
regressive
taxes
may
be
used
for
social
systems
geared
towards
improving
the
skills
of
workers
in
an
effort
to
improve
their
salaries
and
thereby
reduce
the
income
gap,
citing
Swedens
example.
However,
not
all
degrees
or
educational
certifications
are
useful
to
the
country,
or
even
to
the
individual.
Governments
can
try
to
influence
public
behaviour
by
subsidising
only
certain
types
of
education.
For
example,
they
can
choose
to
subsidise
only
medicine
or
engineering
in
order
to
encourage
more
students
to
choose
these
faculties
as
their
chosen
field
of
study.
However,
picking
and
choosing
which
degrees
to
subsidise
raises
questions
of
fairness
and
also
requires
the
government
to
implicitly
concede
that
certain
types
of
education
are
more
valuable
than
others.
Besides
education,
the
government
may
also
offer
healthcare
subsidies
to
help
lighten
the
load
of
medical
bills
on
individuals
and
households.
The
downside
to
this
kind
of
welfare
is
that
it
may
reduce
the
incentive
for
individuals
to
take
care
of
their
own
health.
Also,
while
some
countries
like
Sweden
have
a
social
contract
whereby
the
public
tolerates
taxes
in
exchange
for
well-planned
government
spending,
this
may
not
be
the
case
in
the
US
where
many
are
fundamentally
opposed
to
the
welfare
state
and
taxation.
As
with
all
economic
problems,
there
are
many
solutions
to
the
problem
of
inequality.
There
is
much
the
government
can,
and
should
do,
especially
in
its
efforts
to
improve
the
situation
of
those
on
the
wrong
side
of
inequality,
so
that
they
may
catch
up
with
their
richer
counterparts.
Taxation
will
not
solve
all
problems,
but
neither
will
a
complete
reliance
on
welfare.
A
judicious
mix
of
the
two
types
of
policies
will
be
needed
to
ensure
that
inequality
is
reduced,
but
not
at
the
expense
of
Americas
economy.
Issue 54
04 November 2014
References
Bureau
of
Labor
Statistics
(2013)
Earnings
and
Unemployment
Rates
by
Educational
Attainment.
Retrieved
from:
http://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_chart_001.htm
Martin,
C.
(8
October
2014)
How
Sweden
Fights
Inequality
Without
Soaking
The
Rich.
Retrieved
from:
http://www.vox.com/2014/10/8/6946565/progressive-taxes-are-not-the-solution-to-inequality
Moratta,
D.
(3
October
2013)
Should
We
Raise
Taxes
to
Balance
the
Budget?
Retrieved
from:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/davidmarotta/2013/03/10/should-we-raise-taxes-to-balance-the-budget/
Picket,
K.
(3
October
2011)
Occupy
Wall
Street
Protestors
Post
Manifesto
of
Demands.
Retrieved
from:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/watercooler/2011/oct/3/picket-occupy-wall-street-protesters-post-
manifest/
Obama,
B.
(9
October
2011)
Why
Im
Betting
On
You
to
Help
Shape
the
New
American
Economy.
Retrieved
from:https://medium.com/@PresidentObama/why-im-betting-on-you-to-help-shape-the-new-american-
economy-e80a775b44ee
Issue 54
04 November 2014
Population
ageing
is
becoming
a
key
global
challenge
that
will
have
profound
economic,
social
and
cultural
implications
for
decades
ahead.
Many
countries
in
Europe
have
rapidly
ageing
populations,
yet
significantly
less
income
and
wealth
than
other
regions
to
deal
with
the
adverse
economic
consequences
of
ageing.
According
to
WHO,
the
European
Region
has
the
highest
median
age
in
the
world,
and
includes
9
of
the
15
countries
with
the
longest
life
expectancy.
An
ageing
population
raises
challenges
for
societies
and
economies,
culturally,
organisationally
and
from
an
economic
point
of
view.
Policy
makers
worry
about
how
living
standards
will
be
affected
as
each
worker
has
to
provide
for
the
consumption
needs
of
a
growing
number
of
elderly
dependents.
Markets
worry
about
fiscal
sustainability
and
the
ability
of
policy
makers
to
address
timely
and
sufficiently
these
challenges
in
several
Member
States.
The
seriousness
of
the
challenge
depends
on
how
our
economies
and
societies
respond
and
adapt
to
these
changing
demographic
conditions.
Looking
ahead,
policy
makers
need
to
ensure
long-term
fiscal
sustainability
in
the
face
of
large
but
predictable
challenges,
as
well
as
significant
uncertainty.
This
is
all
the
more
true
as
Europe
has
experienced
the
deepest
recession
in
decades,
which
is
putting
an
unprecedented
stress
on
workers
and
enterprises
and
has
had
a
major
negative
impact
on
public
finances.
In
some
countries
this
process
is
particularly
fast.
Poland,
for
example,
has
one
of
the
fastest
ageing
populations
in
the
European
Union
but
had
a
fertility
rate
of
just
1.30
in
2012.
Furthermore,
the
ratio
of
the
countrys
population
over
65
as
a
percentage
of
the
population
aged
20-64
(the
old
age
dependency
ratio)
is
expected
to
increase
from
20.9%
in
2010
to
58%
in
2050
while
the
share
of
the
working
age
population
(15-64)
is
projected
to
drop
from
71.3%
in
2010
to
53.4%
by
2050.
All
of
these
trends
spell
potential
economic
trouble
for
Poland.
Another
recent
impact
which
can
be
seen
is
on
Finland.
On
10th
October
2014,
Standard
&
Poor
cut
its
credit
rating
from
the
top
level
AAA
to
AA+.
Finland
was
one
of
the
few
countries
in
the
Euro
Zone
to
be
left
with
a
top
credit
rating.
S&P
cited
ageing
population
as
one
of
the
main
factors
behind
this
move.
9
Issue 54
04 November 2014
The
fact
that
ageing
across
the
globe
will
have
an
impact
on
economies,
healthcare
systems,
retirement
policies,
culture,
lifestyle
and
virtually
every
other
aspect
of
society
is
undeniable.
What
is
not
known,
however,
is
how
big
this
impact
will
be
and
how
we
can
prepare
for
this
ageing
world.
Some
Statistics
The
demographics
of
Europe
have
been
rapidly
changing.
In
the
second
half
of
the
20th
century,
the
progressive
decline
to
low
levels
of
fertility
and
lower
mortality
rates
among
the
elderly
resulted
in
population
ageing
in
Europe.
Positive
or
negative
net
migration
flows
tended
to
attenuate
or
intensify
countries
ageing
processes.
In
particular,
in
the
post-World
War
II
period,
fertility
increased
and
subsequently
declined
in
several
countries:
this
demographic
event,
commonly
labelled
as
the
baby
boom,
has
been
a
further
factor
in
the
population
ageing
process
of
the
21st
century.
Fertility
rates
across
the
continent
have
fallen
to
between
1.3
and
1.4
-
below
the
replacement
rate
of
2.1
children.
Recent
demographic
analysis
predicts
that
the
average
age
in
Europe
will
be
42.2
by
2020,
compared
to
39.8
in
2010.
Life
expectancy
rates
will
also
significantly
increase
in
the
coming
decades
-
from
75.34
in
2005-2010
to
77.84
for
2020-2025.
Old
age-dependency
ratios
(the
ratios
of
the
population
aged
65
years
to
that
aged
2064)
have
grown
in
Europe
over
the
last
two
decades,
and
the
latest
United
Nations
projections
(from
2010)
indicate
that
they
will
grow
faster
over
the
next
20
years.
Issue 54
04 November 2014
Looking
Ahead
Since
different
age
groups
have
different
needs
and
productive
capacities,
a
country's
economic
characteristics
will
likely
change
as
its
population
ages.
A
standard
approach
to
assessing
these
changes
is
to
assume
constant
age-specific
behavior
with
respect
to
employment,
consumption,
and
savings,
and
to
assess
the
implications
of
changes
in
the
relative
size
of
different
age
groups
for
these
fundamental
contributors
to
national
income.
Investing
in
education
and
training
so
that
workers
are
more
productive
should
be
a
policy
priority.
Also,
expanding
child
care
to
allow
more
women
to
join
or
stay
in
the
work
force
should
be
implemented.
11
Issue 54
04 November 2014
However,
this
simple
approach
is
likely
to
be
misleading
as
changing
norms
and
expectations
are
likely
to
alter
individual
behavior
in
a
way
that
will
influence
the
economic
consequences
of
ageing.
In
particular,
expectations
of
living
longer
than
previous
generations
may
induce
individuals
to
remain
in
the
workforce
for
longer
and
to
begin
to
draw
down
savings
at
a
later
age.
In
addition,
the
links
between
population
ageing
and
macroeconomic
performance
are
mediated
by
the
institutional
context.
With
increasing
longevity
and
ageing
populations,
retirement
policy,
pension
and
health
care
finance,
the
efficiency
of
labor
and
capital
markets,
and
the
structure
of
regional
and
global
economic
systems
are
likely
to
adjust.
The
magnitude
of
these
shifts
may
in
turn
depend
on
various
factors
affecting
different
countries
or
cultures.
Thus,
ageing
is
one
of
the
greatest
social
and
economic
challenges
of
the
21st
century
for
European
societies.
It
will
affect
all
EU
countries
and
most
policy
areas.
The
European
Union
as
well
as
individual
country
governments
have
started
making
efforts
to
mitigate
the
drastic
effects
ageing
can
have
on
economies.
Hopefully,
these
will
work
out
in
the
best
interests
of
Europe.
12
Issue 54
04 November 2014
References
13
Issue 54
November 2014
Undergraduate
School
of
Economics
Singapore
Management
University
atima.sarda.2014@economics.smu.edu.sg
Undergraduate
School
of
Economics
Singapore
Management
University
li.zhou.2012@economics.smu.edu.sg
Undergraduate
School
of
Economics
Singapore
Management
University
judeds.2014@economics.smu.edu.sg
Undergraduate
School
of
Economics
Singapore
Management
University
shivikas.2013@economics.smu.edu.sg