Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Manuscript Reference
Number: Njmdr_2311_14
Introduction:
dr.sunita.solanki@gmail.com
27
National Journal of Medical and Dental Research, July-September 2014: Volume-2, Issue-4, Page 27-30
Characteristics
Age ( in years)
11+
12+
13+
14+
15+
16+
17+
18+
Religion
Hindu
Muslim
Christian
Others
Type of family
Joint
Nuclear
Extended
Family size
3-5
6-8
9-11
>11
Family Occupation
Labourer
Business
Service
Agriculture
Others
Family Income/month (Rs)
<4000
4001 8000
800112000
1200120000
>20000
Anthropometric Measurements:
Height a vertical measuring scale fixed on a wall was
used. Height was measured to an accuracy of 0.1 cm. After
removing the shoes, subject was asked to stand upright on
flat floor, looking straight and with feet parallel and with
heels, buttocks, shoulder and back of the head touching the
wall. Subjects with height for age < 3rd percentile of the
NCHS/WHO reference data were considered as stunted.
Weight is sensitive index of nutritional status. It was
measured by using a portable weighing machine from
Libra. Subjects were weighed to the nearest 0.5 Kg.
Subjects were asked to stand straight and without shoes.
Body mass index (Quetlets Index) - is defined as the
weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height
in metres (kg/m2). The BMI index has the least correlation with body height and the highest correlation with independent measures of body fat. The prevalence of overweight and obesity is commonly assessed by using body
mass index (BMI). BMI- for- Age: Girls, Age 2-20 years
developed by the National Center for Health Statistics in
collaboration with the National Center for Chronic Disease
Prevention and Health Promotion (2000) was used as reference standard. BMI was plotted against the age in the
chart to determine the weight status by percentile group.
Subjects with BMI for age < 5th percentile were considered as underweight or thin and those with BMI for age
> 85th percentile were considered to be at risk of being
overweight, while subjects with BMI for age between 5th
and 85th percentile were categorized normal.
Percentage
13
54
64
56
97
84
48
12
3
13
15
13
23
20
11
3
104
13
10
3
94
3
2
1
150
258
22
35
60
5
214
164
39
12
50
38
9
3
114
88
69
10
137
26
20
16
2
246
106
32
37
9
57.3
24.7
7.4
8.6
2
Anthropometry:
The mean and Standard Deviation of weight and height
according to age are presented in Table 2. At all ages, the
mean height and weight of the adolescent girls were less
than the NCHS standards.
Table 2 : Age-wise height and weight
Number
Mean
% NCHS
Mean
%NCHS
years)
Height
Standard
Weight
Standard
(cm)+
50 %ile
(Kg)+
50th %ile
of girls
th
Standard
Standard
Deviation
Deviation
11+
13
152+4.337
101.9
33+5.96
95.7
12+
53
147.1+8.56
91.7
36.71+8.24
95.21
13+
65
150.98+5.57
90.98
38.39+5.23
92.49
14+
57
146.31+5.55
85.01
31.55+5.63
92.05
15+
97
153.01+5.19
90.22
41.66+6.47
89.46
16+
84
154.66+6.39
91.36
45.36+8.25
91.36
17+
48
153.69+5.09
90.59
46.59+6.66
91.39
18+
12
157.66+5.06
94.36
42.44+9.26
86.24
Total
439
28
National Journal of Medical and Dental Research, July-September 2014: Volume-2, Issue-4, Page 27-30
Table 3 :
Prevalence of stunting
Total No.
Stunting
11+
13
10
12
54
14.6
13+
65
14+
57
11.9
15+
97
33
33.8
16+
84
25
29.2
17+
48
21
43.2
18+
12
8.3
Total
430
101
23.48
Percentage
Acknowledgements:
<5th
percentile
(under
weight)
5th85th
percentile
(normal
weight)
85th95th
percentile
(at risk
of over
weight)
>95th
percentile
(over
weight)
11+
12
13
39
13+
20
44
14+
47
15+
35
61
16+
19
63
17+
40
18+
Total 430
%
113
26.27%
309
71.8%
4
0.9%
4
0.9%
References:
1. Physical status: The use and interpretation of
anthropometry. Technical Report Series. Geneva;
World Health Organisation; 1995. Report No.:854
2. K Venkaiah, K Damayanti, M U Nayak and K
Vijayaraghavan. Diet and nutritional status of rural
adolescents in India European Journal of Clinical
Nutrition (2002) 56, 1119-1125
3. Anita Malhotra and Santosh Jain Passi. Diet Quality and
nutritional status of rural adolescent girl beneficiaries
of ICDS in North India. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical
Nutrition. 2007; 16 (suppl I): 8 -16.
Discussion:
In the present study, 26.27 % of the girls were found to be
thin. The extent of thinness is lower than those reported
by Venkaiah et al 2002. 39.5% [2], A. Malhotra et al 2007
(30.6%) [3] and Medhi GK et al 41.3% [4]. The findings
were remarkably high among the adolescents of rural
Wardha reported by Deshmukh PR et al. 2006 (69.8%)
[5]. These findings are similar to another study carried on
adolescent girls in rural north India [6]. Stunting was found
in 23.48 % of the girls. These findings are comparable to
other studies carried on adolescent girls in different parts
of India [3,7].
Stunting has important implications for adolescent
29
National Journal of Medical and Dental Research, July-September 2014: Volume-2, Issue-4, Page 27-30
30