Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
What is Constitution?
According to Wade and Philips, "Constitution means a document having a
special legal sanctity which sets out the framework and the principal functions of
the organs of the Government of a State and declares the principles governing
the operation of those organs.
What is special about the Constitution of India?
Indian Constitutions is not the product of any revolution but of the research and
deliberations of a body of eminent representatives of the people who sought to
improve upon the existing systems of administration, makes a retrospect of the
constitutional development indispensable for a proper understanding of this
Constitution.
The Government of India Act, 1935 inter alia provided for Provincial
Legislatures in the British Provinces. Legislatures of Bombay, Bengal, Madras,
Bihar, Assam and the United Provinces & 5 other provinces. Composition of
Assembly varied from Province to Province.
Cripps Mission, 1942 (Sir Stafford Cripps) suggested for the settlement of the
Indian problem suggested that (a) immediately after the end of the World War II
steps shall be taken to set up in India an elected body for framing a new
Constitution of India; (b) Provision shall be made, as asset out below for
participation of Indian States in the Constitution-making body; (c) Constitutionmaking body shall be composed of persons elected Provincial Legislatures and
nominated by the Indian Princes unless the leaders of Indian origin of the
principal communities agreed upon some other form before the end of
hostilities.
The Indian leaders found in it the seed of partition of the country and rejected.
The Act provided for creation of two independent Dominions. India and
Pakistan from 15th August, 1947.
After August 15, 1947 the British Govt. was not to control the Dominion or
the Provinces.
Arrangement of constitution
Part
/
Schedule
Chapter
Articles
Subject matter
1-4
II
5-11
Citizenship
III
12-35
Fundamental Rights
IV
36-51
IVA
51A
Fundamental Duties
52-151
The Union
52-78
II
79-122
Parliament,
Conduct
of
Disqualifications
of
Members,
procedure etc.
III
123
IV
124-147
148-151
152-237
The States
152
Definition
II
153-167
VI
business,
Legislative
III
168-212
IV
213
214-232
VI
233-237
Subordinate Courts
VII
238
Repealed
VIII
239-242
IX
243243O
The Panchayats
IXA
243P243ZG
The Municipalities
244244A
XI
245-263
245-255
II
256-263
Administrative Relations
264300A
264-291
II
292-293
III
294-300
Property,
Contracts,
Rights,
Liabilities,
Obligations and Suits and proceedings
IV
300A
Right to Property
301-307
XII
XIII
of
territory of India
XIV
308-323
308-314
II
315-323
XIVA
323A323B
Tribunals
XV
324329A
Elections
XVI
330-342
XVII
343-351
Official Language
343-344
II
345-347
Regional Languages
III
348-349
IV
350-351
Special Directives
XVIII
352-360
Emergency Provisions
XIX
361-367
XX
368
XXI
369-392
XXII
393-395
Subject matter
I.
II.
The States
The Union Territories
Second
Third
Fourth
Fifth
Sixth
Seventh
Eighth
Ninth
Tenth
Eleventh
Twelfth
APPENDIX
II
These Rights are fundamental because they are most essential for the
attainment by the individual of his full intellectual, moral and spiritual
status.
In Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India case, Justice Bhagwati observed: "These
fundamental rights represent the basic values cherished by the people of this
country since the Vedic times and they are calculated to protect the dignity of
the individual and create conditions in which every human being can develop his
personality to the fullest extent. They weave a "pattern of guarantee" on the
basic structure of human rights, and impose negative obligations on the State
not to encroach on individual liberty in its various dimensions."
Sl.
No.
Fundamental Right
Relevant
Article Nos.
1.
Right to Equality
14 18
2.
right to freedom
19 22
3.
23 24
4.
25 28
5.
29 30
6.
right to property
31a
31-d
[19(1)(f) and 300A also]
32 35
Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 597 (passport case)
Maneka Gandhi was the daughter-in-law of Mrs. Indira Gandhi, the then PM. Maneka
Gandhi was leader of Janata Party. To harass her, the Central Govt. impounded her
passport without showing any valid reasons. The Supreme Court held that the passport
was the property of the petitioner. The Central Govt. could not impound her passport
simply to harass her. It could do so for the "public purpose" but here "public purpose"
was not seen.
Article 38: State to secure a social order for the promotion of welfare
of the people: State shall strive to promote the welfare of the people by
securing and protecting as effectively as it may a social order in which
justice, social, economic and political, shall inform all the institutions of the
national life.
The State shall, in particular, strive to minimise the inequalities in income, and
endeavour to eliminate inequalities in status, facilities and opportunities, not only
amongst individuals but also amongst groups of people residing in different areas
or engaged in different vocations.
Article 39A: (w.e.f. 3.1.1977 44th amendment): Equal justice and free
legal aid:
The State shall secure that the operation of the legal system promotes
justice, on a basis of equal opportunity, and shall, in particular, provide
free legal aid, by suitable legislation or schemes or in any other way, to
ensure that opportunities for securing justice are not denied to any citizen
The State shall take steps to organise village panchayats and endow them with
such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to function as
units of self-government.
The State shall, within the limits of its economic capacity and development, make
effective provision for securing the right to work, to education and to public
assistance in cases of unemployment, old age, sickness and disablement, and in
other cases of undeserved want.
Article 42: Provision for just and humane conditions of work and
maternity relief.
Article 43: The State shall endeavour to secure living wage, etc.
for workers.
The State shall endeavour to secure, by suitable legislation or economic
Article 44: Uniform Civil Code for the citizens through out the territory
of India.
Article 45: Provision for free and compulsory education for children until
they complete the age of 14 years.
Article 47: Duty of the State to raise the level of nutrition and the standard
of living and to improve public health.
1. The right to move the Supreme Court by appropriate proceedings for the
enforcement of the rights conferred by this Part (III) is guaranteed.
2. The Supreme Court shall have power to issue directions or orders or writs,
including writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo
warranto
and
certiorari, whichever
may
be
appropriate,
for
the
makes an application to the High Court for the vacation of such order and
furnishes a copy of such application to the party in whose favour such order has
been made or the counsel of such party, the High Court shall dispose of the
application within a period of two weeks from the date on which it is received or
from the date on which the copy of such application is so furnished, whichever is
later, or where the High Court is closed on the last day of that period, before the
expiry of the next day afterwards on which the High Court is open; and if the
application is not so disposed of, the interim order shall on the expiry of that
period, or, as the case may be, the expiry of the said next day, stand vacated.
(4) The power conferred on a High Court by this article shall not be in derogation
o the power conferred on the Supreme Court by clause (2) of article 32.
WRIT JURISDICTION
(under Article 32 and Article 226)
Meaning of "Writ":
Tomlins Law Dictionary: A "writ" is said to be a formal letter of the king's sealed with a
seal, directed to some judge, officer, or minister, etc. at the suit or plaint of a subject,
requiring to have a thing done, for the cause briefly expressed, which is to be discussed in
the proper court, according to law.
Generally, a "writ" means a written command, precept (rule of action), or
formal order issued by a court, directing or enjoining the person or persons
to whom it is addressed to do or refrain from doing some act specified
therein.
Writs are issued by HC or SC as extraordinary remedies in cases where there was either
no remedy available under the ordinary law or the remedy available was inadequate.
Writ jurisdiction emantes from one of the Fundamental Rights i.e. Article
32: "Right to Constitutional Remedies" directly to approach Supreme Court and
also from Article 226 where High Courts have the power to issue certain writs,
directions, orders.
ARTICLE 32: Remedies for enforcement of rights conferred by this Part (III of
the Constitution of India)
1. The right to move the Supreme Court by appropriate proceedings for the
enforcement of the rights conferred by this Part (III) is guaranteed.
2. The Supreme Court shall have power to issue directions or orders or writs,
including writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition,
quo warranto and certiorari, whichever may be appropriate, for the
enforcement of any of the rights conferred by this Part (III).
3. Without prejudice to the powers conferred on the Supreme Court by
clauses (1) and (2), Parliament may by law empower any other court to
exercise within the local limits of its jurisdiction all or any of the powers
exercisable by the Supreme court under clause (2).
4. The right guaranteed by this article shall not be suspended except as
otherwise provided for by this Constitution."
ARTICLE 226:
1. Notwithstanding anything contained in article 32, every High Court shall
have powers, throughout the territories in relation to which it exercises
jurisdiction, to issue to any person or authority, including in appropriate
cases, any Government, within those territories directions, orders or writs,
including writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition,
quo warranto and certiorari, or any of them, for the enforcement of any of
the rights conferred by this Part (III) and for any other purpose.
.
(4) "
KINDS OF WRITS
1. HAEBEAS CORPUS (have the body)
An order to let the Court know on what ground he has been confined and to set
him free if there is no justification for his detention.
The applicant can be the prisoner himself or any person on his behalf to safeguard
his liberty approach Court for issue the writ of habeas corpus.
Disobedience to this writ is met with punishment for contempt of Court under the
Contempt of Courts Act.
It does not lie against private individuals or body except where the
State is in collusion with such private party in the matter of
contravention of any provision of the Constitution or a Statute.
3. PROHIBITION:
Enables enquiry into the legality of the claim which a person asserts
to an office or franchise and to oust him from such position if he is an
usurper.
The holder of the office has to show to the Court under what
authority he holds office
Based on the principle that the public has an interest to see that an
unlawful claimant does not usurp a public office. Examples of Offices