A childhood friend has challenged me thusly: Bob, you're the oncologist.

Jewish liberalism has clearly

unmasked itself as a malignancy in the body of world Jewry. Time to come up with a treatment plan.
The Surgeon General vs the Marlboro Man: Who Really Won? - The images in this slide set are from an
exhibition curated by Alan Blum, MD, at the University of Alabama Gorgas Library (November to
December 2013) to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the Surgeon General's Report on Smoking
and Health, released on January 11, 1964 by Dr. Luther Terry.

Romney: Obama's Letter to Iran 'Naive'

Pope Demotes Conservative American Cardinal Raymond Burke
Reports: Obama Rejects Boehner's Offer on Immigration Reform

"The numbers tell the story: In 2009, Democrats had 60 senators, when you include the two
independents who caucused with them; in 2015, they will have 45. In 2009, Democrats had 256
members of the House; in 2015, they will have 192. In 2009, Democrats had 28 governors; in 2015, they
will have 18. In 2009, Democrats controlled both legislative chambers in 27 states; in 2015, they will
control only 11. In 2009, Democrats controlled 62 legislative chambers; in 2015, they will control only 28
(with one tie and two still undecided)."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/gop-presidential-hopefuls-jockey-for-position-in-a-crowded2016-field/2014/11/08/da41466e-66b5-11e4-bb14-4cfea1e742d5_story.html
This is a fair/balanced piece; my ticket remains Walker/Cruz but Kasich/Pence would be ok, too.
Don't want Rubio/Bush/Romney/Christie/Ryan ... Carson ... Paul ... Huckabee/Santorum; Portman would
probably
be
OK,
but
Perry
is
eclipsed
by
Cruz.
I'm in favor of a muscular foreign policy and I'm opposed to amnesty until the border has been secured;
fortunately, it seems the social-issues can be contained, for the Dems will again be faced with the
dilemma
of
the
degree
to
which
they
will
maintain
loyalty
to
BHO.
Most of the postings on this page reflect the elitism that led to the massive defeat of Dems [both on the
federal
and
state
levels].

Cool. Will your son and/or daughter mind going to war to appease repubican thirst for war? I love how
you would sacrifice their lives for repubican power hunger. Thank you for their service.
LikeReply
Robert B. Sklaroff M.D.
7:48 AM EST
Affirmative!
We have witnessed the alternative, namely, that pacifism has lost an Iraq that it will now be far more
expensive [in multiple ways] to recover; furthermore, it is mandatory that the Iran-challenge be
confronted
sooner
rather
than
later.

The GOP wants America to bulk-up, again, and willful ignorance of an increasingly dangerous world
[including Russkies] does not substitute for an assertive Foreign Policy.

Obama
got
elected?
Hmmmmmmm?
Some Republicans believed his lies and voted for him.
LikeReply
stooges_cubed
7:32 AM EST
Nah. Not believable.
Robert B. Sklaroff M.D.
7:52 AM EST
The "Stooge" conveniently forgets the lies-of-the-year that BHO was universally recognized to have
uttered, last year.
LikeShare
1
stooges_cubed
7:56 AM EST [Edited]
I do? Do you remember the "feigned amnesia" repubicans played the last 6 years? You know....like how
nothing whatsoever happened before Obama? Like...how everything in the world is Obama's fault
according to right wing echo chamber? How's that war drum, doctor skarloff? getting your sons and
daughters ready to go to war for your ideology?
Rush likes Walker and Cruz; he feels the key-task is to STOP BHO, and then ensure a Conservative
philosophy is articulated behaviorally by Congressional leaders [via bills passed that BHO will be hardpressed to sign].
Each has strengths and most have unique experiences; I love Cruz [because he is consistently
courageous and correct and Constitutional], and suspect he will continue to rise rapidly in the evolving
polling.
They absented themselves because of disillusionment with BHO.
As noted earlier, although the Establishment-types reflect a GOP that requires refinement, others are
serious; this contrasts with those who still feel Hillary will run/win [despite BenghaziGate and aged
philosophies].
As noted earlier, the GOP "brand" is recovering as the Dems' imagery is sinking...as documented by the
Electorate; trite, broad-brush attacks won't work any longer [nor will crassly-demographic appeals].
To follow is documentation of the difficult task facing Dems noting, usually, the power of incumbency.
The GOP recognizes it was provided an opportunity to legislate in a fashion that will translate into how it
would lead.
Dems are recognized, even by DW-S, to be in disarray; they would be well-advised to create a "Coffee
Klatch" wing [of populists, matching the TEA Party Movement] by resuscitating the DLC [which propelled
Clinton].
These are high-quality, serious people to whom the Dems should listen, except for Cliven Bundy [who
probably subscribes to conservative principles but doesn't have a platform and a political track-record
that places him in the category of the others].

As noted earlier, the GOP "brand" is recovering as the Dems' imagery is sinking...as documented by the
Electorate; trite, broad-brush attacks won't work any longer [nor will crassly-demographic appeals].
No, the no-shows perhaps evinced self-recognition of ignorance.