Veterinary Parasitology 186 (2012) 170177

Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect

Veterinary Parasitology
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/vetpar

Immunostimulatory and protective effects of Aloe vera against

coccidiosis in industrial broiler chickens
Masood Akhtar a, , Abdul Hai a , Mian Muhammad Awais a , Zafar Iqbal a , Faqir Muhammad b ,
Ahsan ul Haq c , Muhammad Irfan Anwar d
a
b
c
d

IImmunoparasitology Laboratory, Department of Parasitology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan

Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan
Department of Poultry Science, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan
Poultry Research Institute, Ofce of Deputy District Livestock Ofcer (Poultry), Faisalabad, Pakistan

a r t i c l e

i n f o

Article history:
Received 7 July 2011
Received in revised form 9 November 2011
Accepted 16 November 2011
Keywords:
Coccidiosis
Immunostimulation
Aloe vera
Broilers

a b s t r a c t
This paper reports the immunostimulatory and protective effects of Aloe vera extracts
(aqueous and ethanolic) against coccidiosis in industrial broiler chickens. The study was
divided into two experiments. Experiment-I was conducted for the evaluation of immunostimulatory activity of A. vera and experiment-II demonstrated the protective efcacy of
A. vera extracts against coccidiosis in chickens. Results of the experiment-I revealed signicantly higher (p < 0.05) lymphoproliferative responses in chickens administered with
ethanolic extract of A. vera as compared to those administered with aqueous extract and
control group. Microplate haemagglutination assay for humoral response on day 7th and
14th post primary and secondary injections of sheep red blood cells (SRBCs) revealed signicantly higher (p < 0.05) anti SRBC antibody (total Igs, IgG and IgM) titers in chickens
of experimental groups as compared to the control group. None of the extracts, however, demonstrated signicant effects on the development of lymphoid organs. Results
of experiment-II revealed maximum protection (60%) in chickens administered with aqueous Aloe extract as compared to the ethanolic extract administered chickens (45%). Mean
oocysts per gram of droppings in the control group was signicantly higher (p < 0.05) as
compared to the chickens in both the experimental groups. Chickens administered with
aqueous Aloe extract showed a minimal mean lesion score (2.3) followed by those administered with ethanolic Aloe extract (2.6) and control chickens (3.05) for caeca, and a similar
pattern was observed for intestinal lesion scoring. Further, signicantly higher weight gains
and antibody titers (p < 0.05) were observed in chickens administered with A. vera extracts
as compared to those in the control group. It was concluded that A. vera may be a potential
and valuable candidate to stimulate the immune responses and can be used successfully as
an immunotherapeutic agent against coccidiosis in industrial broiler chickens.
2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction
Coccidiosis, caused by parasitic protozoa of genus Eimeria, is an important disease in poultry production, leading

Corresponding author. Tel.: +92 419201094; fax: +92 419201094.

E-mail address: drakhtar@brain.net.pk (M. Akhtar).
0304-4017/$ see front matter 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.11.059

to poor growth rate and high mortality with signicant economic losses up to 3 billion US dollars annually worldwide
(Williams, 1999; Dalloul and Lillehoj, 2006). Generally,
Eimeria (E.) species responsible for coccidiosis in chickens include E. tenella, E. necatrix, E. acervulina, E. maxima,
E. brunetti and E. mitis but the rst four are economically
important and prevalent worldwide including Pakistan
(Ayaz et al., 2003; Shah et al., 2009). Eimeria species infect

M. Akhtar et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 186 (2012) 170177

epithelial cells of the birds intestine causing enteritis and

bloody diarrhoea. Severity of disease, however, depends
on the specie(s) of Eimeria involved. On the other hand,
in a sub-clinical form, it may cause immunosuppression in
chickens that paves the way to secondary disease conditions. So, management of disease and maintenance of the
immune functions for maximum performance, growth and
production in poultry industry are fundamental requirements for protable farming. To meet these requirements,
approaches adopted by the poultry farmers are the uses of
chemotherapeutic and biological agents including vaccines
(Lillehoj and Trout, 1996; Mehala and Moorthy, 2008). Nevertheless, development of resistant pathogenic strains and
drug residues in animal products used by the human beings
are the major constraints in this regard (Delespaux and
Koning, 2007; Reig and Toldra, 2008).
Current scenario demands for the introduction of
some alternative and effective strategies that may confer the poultry birds a strong immune status to ght
against the pathogenic organisms. In such circumstances,
synthetic and native immunomodulators seem to be suitable candidates to maintain the immune status of the
birds to combat different infections. Several synthetic and
native immunomodulators have been reported to regulate the natural immune responses and thus increased
production performance of the birds (Yamamoto, 1996;
Nundkumar and Ojewole, 2002; Awais et al., 2011). Botanical immunomodulators are considered ideal because of
their abundant availability, easy processing, potent efcacy
and minimal or no chances of residues in animal products,
which are used for human consumption (Patwardhan and
Gautam, 2005).
In this regard, Aloe vera, also known as the medicinal
Aloe, has been shown to have diverse biological activities.
It is frequently cited as being used in herbal medicines for
its curative and therapeutic properties and over 75 biologically active compounds have been identied from A.
vera (Reynolds and Dweck, 1999). It has been used therapeutically for centuries and is of particular interest due
to its historic reputation as a curative agent and dietary
supplement (Mehala and Moorthy, 2008).
In addition, A. vera components also exhibit
immunomodulatory activities that have been demonstrated in numerous animal models (Talmadge et al., 2004;
Kil, 2006) other than poultry except for some preliminary
studies on its therapeutic efcacy (Choi and Chung, 2003).
Keeping in view its diverse biological activities, present
study was conducted to investigate the immunostimulatory effects of A. vera extracts in industrial broiler chickens
and their subsequent protection against avian coccidiosis.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Preparation of A. vera extracts
Leaves of A. vera used in the present study were obtained
from Botanical Garden, University of Agriculture Faisalabad (UAF), Pakistan and its authenticity was conrmed
by the concerned botanist of UAF, and a voucher sample was kept there. Immediately after harvesting, leaves
were washed with chlorinated water (chlorine 510 ppm)

171

Table 1
Composition of aqueous and ethanolic extracts of Aloe vera based on proximate analysis.
Constituent (%)

Aqueous extract

Ethanolic extract

Crude protein
Crude fat
Ash
Nitrogen free extract

4.85
0.25
18.18
76.72

3.89
54.15
21.10
20.86

followed by distilled water (Femenia et al., 1999). Thereafter, pulp was collected from the cleaned leaves with the
help of a wooden spatula within 34 h post-harvesting to
minimize any deterioration. A. vera pulp was processed
for aqueous and ethanolic extracts following Madan et al.
(2008) with minor modications briey described as follows.
2.1.1. Aqueous extract
Pulp was blended in an electric blender. The blended
material (100 g in 1 l double distilled H2 O) was homogenized for 10 min at 4 C in a homogenizer (Ultra-Turrax,
Janke & Kunkel UK). The homogenous suspension was
boiled for 1012 h in a water bath at 80 C. The gelatinous
material obtained (750 ml) was ltered through Buckner
funnel followed by Whatman No. 1 lter paper to remove
the oating material in the suspension. The ltrate thus
obtained was subjected to lyophilization at a temperature
of 65 C using freeze drying system (CHRIST, alpha 1-4
LD, Gertrocknugsanlagen Freeze dryers, Germany) that
yielded 28 g dried extract. Dried extract was subjected
to proximate analysis (A.O.A.C., 1980) (Table 1) and the
nal concentration was reconstituted in sterile phosphate
buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.2) at a dose rate of 100 mg of
dried extract per ml of PBS.
2.1.2. Ethanolic extract
The blended A. vera pulp was homogenized in a homogenizer by taking 100 g pulp in 1 l absolute ethanol (95%;
Merck , Germany). The homogenized suspension was
shaken vigorously on a magnetic stirrer (Fisher Scientic Co., USA) for 68 h at room temperature (25 C). The
suspension thus obtained was subjected to ltration and
lyophilized as described above. The yield of dried ethanolic
extract was 37 g. Dried extract was subjected to proximate
analysis (A.O.A.C., 1980) (Table 1) and the nal concentration was reconstituted in sterile PBS at a dose rate of 100 mg
of dried extract per ml of PBS.
2.2. Infective material
Chicken guts suspected to be naturally infected with
Eimeria species were collected from different poultry sale
points and outbreak cases of poultry farms in and around
Faisalabad, Pakistan. The guts were processed for collection and sporulation of oocysts as described earlier
(Reid and Long, 1979) in the Immunoparasitology Laboratory, Department of Parasitology, University of Agriculture,
Faisalabad (UAF), Pakistan. Briey, contents of the positive guts were placed in potassium dichromate solution
(2.5%) and incubated for 6072 h (37 C temperature and
6080% humidity) for sporulation of the oocysts. After

172

M. Akhtar et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 186 (2012) 170177

Table 2
Chemical composition of withdrawal feed used in the experiment.
Chemical analysis

g/kg

Protein
Fat
Carbohydrate
Fiber
Lysine
Ash
Calcium
Phosphorus
Sodium
Methionine + cystine
Methionine

200.0
45.0
420.0
50.0
12.0
55.0
10.0
5.0
1.5
7.0
4.0

ME: 11.995 MJ/kg.

conrmation of sporulation, the suspension of sporulated

oocysts was subjected to zinc sulphate (ZnSO4 ) oatation (Levine, 1961). Sporulated oocysts were washed thrice
with PBS and subjected to McMaster counting technique
to count the number of sporulated oocysts per ml of suspension (Ryley et al., 1976). The nal concentration of
suspension was adjusted to 6.5 104 7.0 104 sporulated
oocysts per 2 ml of PBS and stored in a sterilized screw
capped bottle at 4 C until further use.
2.3. Morphometric analysis of sporulated oocysts for
identication of different species
Final suspension of sporulated oocysts was subjected to
morphometric analysis and different species of genus Eimeria were identied based upon their predilection sites from
where they were collected, morphology and size (Reid and
Long, 1979). Morphometric analysis of sporulated oocysts
revealed the presence of three species of Eimeria (E. tenella,
E. acervulina, and E. necatrix) in the nal suspension processed for challenge experiment.
2.4. Experimental design
A total of 180-day-old industrial broiler chicks (Hubbard) were procured from local hatchery and reared on
the oor system under standard management conditions at
Animal House, Institute of Microbiology, UAF. All the chicks
were provided withdrawal feed (Table 2) and water ad libitum. All the chickens were acclimatized for 5 days before
the initiation of experimental procedures and were inoculated with the routine vaccination (Anwar et al., 2008).
At 5th day of age, chickens were randomly divided into
two main groups namely A (n = 60) and B (n = 120) and
housed in two separate sheds. Group A was assigned to
experiment-I (evaluation of immunostimulatory effect of
A. vera) and group B to experiment-II (protective efcacy
of A. vera against coccidiosis).
2.5. Experiment-I: effect of A. vera extracts on humoral
and cellular immune responses

group consisted of 20 chicks, which were administered

orally with the assigned extracts at a dose rate of 300 mg/kg
of body weight/day for three consecutive days, i.e., 5th, 6th
and 7th days of age. The dose rates of the Aloe extracts used
in the present study were optimized in a preliminary dose
titration pilot project (data not shown).
2.5.1. Evaluation of cellular immune response
In
vivo
lymphoproliferative
response
to
phytohaemagglutinin-P (PHA-P; Sigma , USA) by using the
classic toe-web assay was used to demonstrate the cellular
immune response as described by Corrier (1990). Briey,
half of the chickens of both the experimental and control
groups were injected PHA-P (100 g/100 ml/chicken;
intradermally) between the third and fourth digits of
the right foot on day 14th post administration of A. vera
extracts. The left foot injected with PBS (100 l) served as
control. The thickness of the interdigital skin was measured with a pressure-sensitive micrometer screw gauge
at 24 and 72 h post PHA-P injection. Lymphoproliferative
response to PHA-P was calculated by using the following
formula:
Lymphoproliferative response =
(PHA-P response, right foot) (PBS response, left foot)

2.5.2. Evaluation for humoral immune response

To assess the humoral response, anti-SRBC antibody (total Igs, IgM and IgG) titers were detected by
using microplate haemagglutination test according to the
methodology described by Yamamoto and Glick (1982)
with minor modications suggested by Qureshi and
Havenstein (1994). Briey, on day 14th post administration of A. vera extracts, chickens were injected SRBCs
(5%) via intramuscular route (1 ml/chicken) followed by
a booster at day 14th post primary injection. Blood was
collected at day 7th and 14th post primary and secondary injections to separate the sera. All the samples were
analyzed for total Igs, IgM (mercaptoethanol-sensitive)
and IgG (mercaptoethanol-resistant) anti-SRBCs antibodies. For this purpose, two fold serial dilutions (50 l volume
in each well) of the sera samples were made by using PBS
as a diluent. In each well of the microtitration plate, 50 l
suspension of 5% (v/v) SRBCs was added and mixed gently.
The plates were incubated at room temperature (25 C) for
30 min. The titer of the well containing 50% agglutination
and 50% reticulum settling (clumping) was considered as
the total anti-SRBC antibody titer of the test sera. To detect
IgG titer, 0.01 M mercaptoethanol (50 l) in PBS was added
instead of using PBS alone, followed by the previously mentioned procedure. IgM titers were calculated by subtracting
the IgG titers from total antibody titers of the respective
sera samples.
2.6. Relative weight of the lymphoid organs

To evaluate the immunostimulatory effects of A. vera

extracts, chicks of group A (n = 60) were randomly divided
into three sub-groups (A1 : aqueous Aloe extract, A2 :
ethanolic Aloe extract, and A3 : untreated control). Each

Chickens from all the groups were individually weighed

and slaughtered at day 35th post administration of A. vera
extracts. Lymphoid organs including bursa of fabricius,

M. Akhtar et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 186 (2012) 170177

thymus, spleen and cecal tonsils were removed and

weighed. The data thus collected were expressed as organ
weight ratio relative to the live body weight (Giamborne
and Closser, 1990).
2.7. Experiment-II: protective effects of A. vera extracts
against coccidiosis
To evaluate the protective effects of A. vera extracts
against coccidiosis, chicks of group B (n = 120) were randomly assigned to three sub-groups (B1 : aqueous Aloe
extract, B2 : ethanolic Aloe extract and B3 : untreated control). Each group consisted of 40 chicks, which were
administered orally with the assigned extracts at a dose
rate of 300 mg/kg body weight/day for three consecutive
days, i.e., 5th, 6th and 7th days of age. The dose rates of the
Aloe extracts used in the present study were optimized in
a preliminary dose titration pilot project (data not shown).
2.7.1. Therapeutic evaluation
Therapeutic efcacy of A. vera was determined
by inoculation of mixed species of genus Eimeria
(6.5 104 7.0 104 sporulated oocysts/chicken) in all the
groups on day 14th post administration of A. vera extracts.
Chickens of all the groups were monitored for body weight
gain per day from day 3rd to 12th post challenge. Fecal
examination was conducted daily up to day 12th post
challenge and numbers of oocysts per gram of droppings
were calculated by using the McMaster counting technique
(Ryley et al., 1976). Clinical symptoms and mortality during the experiment in each group were also recorded. The
lesions on the intestine and caeca of dead and survived
chickens were enumerated from day 6th to 9th post challenge and were scored on a scale from 0 to 4 (Johnson and
Reid, 1970). Per cent mortality was calculated in each group
post challenge by using the following formula:
No. of birds died due to coccidiosis post challenge
100
No. of total birds challenged
The cause of death of all the birds died post challenge was
conrmed by autopsy ndings. Per cent protection was calculated by subtracting the per cent mortality from 100. On
day 12th post challenge, lymphoid organs from the survived chickens of all the groups were removed and organ
to body weight ratios of lymphoid organs were calculated.
2.7.2. Evaluation of elicited humoral response against
Eimeria spp. in chickens administered with A. vera
extracts
Elicited humoral response against coccidial species used
in the challenge experiment was assessed by enzyme
linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Briey, on day 7th
and 14th post infection, blood was collected from the chickens of each group (both treated and control) to get sera.
ELISA was performed according to Garcia et al. (2006) with
minor modications (Awais et al., 2011). For this assay,
2 ml complete fraction of sporulated oocysts was sonicated
for 15 (5 3) min in a water-jacketed processing vessel
with cold water circulation and centrifuged for 10 min at
10,000 g to get the soluble antigen (supernatant) and
used for coating the plates. Flat bottomed microtitration

173

plates (96-wells; medium binding, polystyrene, Flow Lab.,

UK) were coated with 0.1 ml of the antigen (10 g/ml)
diluted in 0.1 M carbonate buffer (pH 9.6) and incubated
overnight at 4 C. The plates were washed thrice with washing buffer (0.05% PBSTween 20; pH 7.4); whereas, non
specic protein binding sites were blocked by adding carbonate buffer containing 8% non-fat dry milk for 2 h at
37 C. The control and test sera were diluted (1:10) in
PBSTween 20 and added to each well in the microtitration plate in duplicate, having 0.1 ml in each well and
then incubated for 2 h at 37 C. After washing with the
washing buffer, horseradish peroxidase conjugated rabbit anti-chickens IgG (1:400) in PBSTween 20 was added
(100 l/well) and incubated for 1 h at 37 C. After washing, the peroxidase activity was observed by adding 0.1 ml
of ortho-phenylenediamine (OPD) solution (20 mg orthophenylenediamine/50 ml of 0.1 M phosphate citrate buffer,
pH 5.0, and 20 l of 30% H2 O2 ). The reaction was blocked by
adding 0.05 ml of 1.0 N HCL. The optical density (OD) was
read at 492 nm in an ELISA reader. The mean absorbance
values were recorded and the OD value was calculated. Positive and negative control sera were run in each plate and
the corrected OD value was determined as follows:
ODcorrected =

ODSample ODNegative control of plate

ODPositive control of plate ODNegative control of plate

2.8. Statistical analysis

One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncans
multiple-range tests were used for the determination of
statistical signicance using statistical analysis software
(SAS , 2004). Data on per cent mortality were analyzed
using the Chi-square test. Value of p < 0.05 was considered to be statistical signicant for lymphoproliferative
response, antibody titers, daily weight gain and oocysts per
gram of droppings; whereas, for per cent mortality, protection and relative organ weight ratio of lymphoid organs
value of p was considered to be <0.01.
3. Results
3.1. Experiment-I
Cell mediated immunity in terms of lymphoproliferative response was assessed by measuring amplitude of
toe-web swelling at 24 and 72 h post PHA-P injection, and
the results revealed signicantly higher (p < 0.05) lymphoproliferative responses in chickens administered with A.
vera extracts (either ethanolic or aqueous) as compared to
those in the control group. Furthermore, at 24 h post PHA-P
injection signicantly higher (p < 0.05) lymphoproliferative response was recorded in chickens administered with
ethanolic extract as compared to those administered with
aqueous extract (Fig. 1). These results indicated the highest cellular immune response against PHA-P injection in
chickens administered with ethanolic extract of A. vera followed by the chickens administered with aqueous extract
as compared to control group.
To demonstrate the humoral immune response, sheep
red blood cells (SRBCs) were used as non-pathogenic

174

M. Akhtar et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 186 (2012) 170177

Fig. 1. Lymphoproliferative response to phytohemagglutinin-P in experimental and control chickens. Bars sharing similar letters at 24 and 72 h
are statistically non-signicant (p > 0.05). A1 : aqeuous extract of Aloe vera;
A2 : ethanolic extract of Aloe vera; A3 : control.

Fig. 2. Oocysts per gram of droppings post-challenge in experimental and

control chickens. Bars sharing similar letters on each particular day are
statistically non-signicant (p > 0.05). B1 : aqeuous extract of Aloe vera;
B2 : ethanolic extract of Aloe vera; B3 : control.

3.2. Experiment-II
antigens for stimulating T-cell dependent response (Saxena
et al., 1997; Kundu et al., 1999). Results revealed that
oral administration of A. vera extracts resulted in signicantly higher (p < 0.05) total immunoglobulins (Igs),
immunoglobulin-G (IgG) and immunoglobulin-M (IgM)
titers against SRBCs at day 7th and 14th post primary and
secondary injections of SRBCs as compared to the control
group (Table 3). However, difference among the experimental groups (administered with A. vera extracts) at day
7th and 14th post primary injection was statistically nonsignicant (p > 0.05); whereas, at day 7th and 14th post
secondary injection chickens administered with ethanolic
extract showed statistically higher (p < 0.05) response as
compared to those administered with aqueous extract.
Effects of the A. vera extracts on the development of
lymphoid organs including bursa of fabricius, spleen, thymus and caecal tonsils were also calculated, and results
were expressed in terms of organbody weight ratio. The
results revealed apparently higher per cent organbody
weight ratio in both the experimental groups as compared
to control group; but the difference was statistically nonsignicant (p > 0.01) (data not shown).

Table 3
Antibody response to sheep red blood cells in experimental and control
chickens.
Group

Day 7 PPI

Day 14 PPI

Total anti-SRBCs antibody titer

55.46a
55.97a
A1
A2
55.97a
55.46a
A3
27.66b
23.98b
Immunoglobulin-M
34.57a
28.31a
A1
A2
35.08a
23.84b
A3
19.66b
10.16c
Immunoglobulin-G
20.89a
27.66b
A1
A2
20.89a
31.62a
A3
8b
13.82c

Day 7 PSI

Day 14 PSI

64b
73.52a
32c

63.97b
64.56a
27.54c

32.38b
38.44a
16c

8.51a
8.59a
6.65b

31.62b
35.08a
16c

55.46a
55.97a
20.89b

Means sharing similar letters in a column are statistically non-signicant

(p > 0.05). A1: aqeuous extract of Aloe vera; A2: ethanolic extract of Aloe
vera; A3: control. PPI: post-primary injection; PSI: post-secondary injection.

In therapeutic evaluation, fecal oocyst shedding, intestinal lesion scores, body weight gain and per cent protection
were used to evaluate the anticoccidial efcacy (Johnson
and Reid, 1970; Dalloul et al., 2003) of A. vera extracts. Fecal
oocyst shedding was signicantly lower (p < 0.05) in chickens administered with A. vera extracts when compared to
the infected control group, whereas, among the experimental groups, the difference was statistically non-signicant
(Fig. 2).
Protection was maximum (60%) in the group administered with aqueous Aloe extract followed by group of
chickens administered with ethanolic Aloe extract (45%).
On the other hand, signicantly lower (p < 0.01; 20%)
protection in the control group as compared to both experimental groups was recorded. Lesion scoring (scale 04)
of the survived and dead chickens was performed on day
6th to 9th post challenge with mixed species of Eimeria.
Chickens administered with aqueous Aloe extract showed
a minimal mean lesion score (2.3) followed by those
administered with ethanolic Aloe extract (2.6) and control chickens (3.05) for caeca, and a similar pattern was
observed for intestinal lesion scoring (Table 4). Signicantly higher (p < 0.05) body weight gain was recorded
in chickens of experimental groups administered with A.
vera extracts as compared to those in the control group;
whereas, chickens administered with aqueous extract
showed signicantly higher (p < 0.05) body weight gains,
compared with those administered with ethanolic extract
(Fig. 3). Organbody weight ratio of all the lymphoid organs
was higher in chickens of experimental groups as compared
Table 4
Per cent mortality and Lesion scores in experimental and control chickens.
Group

B1
B2
B3

Mortality (%)

40
55a
80c

Mean lesion score

Intestine

Caeca

2.0
2.1
3.4

2.3
2.6
3.05

For mortality, per cent values sharing similar letters in column are statistically non-signicant (p > 0.05). B1 : aqueous extract of Aloe vera; B2 :
ethanolic extract of Aloe vera; B3 : control.

M. Akhtar et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 186 (2012) 170177

Fig. 3. Weight gains in chickens from day 3rd to 12th post challenge
in experimental and control chickens. Bars sharing similar letters on
each particular day are statistically non-signicant (p > 0.05). B1 : aqeuous
extract of Aloe vera; B2 : ethanolic extract of Aloe vera; B3 : control.

to control group; although the difference was statistically non-signicant (p > 0.01). The antibody titers obtained
from ELISA are shown in Fig. 4. In the chickens administered
with A. vera extracts, either aqueous or ethanolic, a signicant increase in mean absorbance values was noted on day
7th post challenge (0.27 0.02 in group B1 and 0.31 0.02
in group B2 ) as compared to control group (0.14 0.02)
(p < 0.05). A similar trend was observed on day 14th post
challenge; however, on day 14th, higher OD values were
observed as compared to those obtained on day 7th post
challenge.
4. Discussion
Coccidiosis is primarily controlled by medication under
eld conditions in spite of limitations like drug resistance, and other concerns apprehended about food chain
contamination (Martin et al., 1997). As a substitute, the
use of plants and their products as immunodulators and
therapeutics have a traditional history. According to a
report, more than 64% of the worlds population use
botanical drugs to combat health problems (Farnsworth,
1999). In this regard, therapeutic properties of A. vera
have been studied in different animal models and human
beings. These include anti-inammatory, immunomodulatory, wound healing, promotion of radiation damage
repair, antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal, antidiabetic and

Fig. 4. Serum antibody titers on day 7th and 14th post infection with
Eimeria species (local isolates). Bars sharing similar letters on each particular day are statistically non-signicant (p > 0.05). B1 : aqeuous extract of
Aloe vera; B2 : ethanolic extract of Aloe vera; B3 : control.

175

antineoplastic activities (Stanic, 2007; Pandey and Mishra,

2010). As far as could be ascertained, except Yim et al.
(2010), therapeutic efcacy of A. vera in poultry has not
been explored.
In the present study, aqueous and ethanolic extracts
from the A. vera pulp exerted stimulatory effects on
humoral and cellular immune responses in chickens. The
higher cellular immune responses in A. vera administered
chickens may be due to the Aloe polysaccharides, especially acemannan (ACM), which activated the macrophages
to produce inammatory cytokines such as IL-1, IL-6, and
TNF- (Womble and Helderman, 1988, 1992; Zhang and
Tizard, 1996; Tan and Vanitha, 2004; Chow et al., 2005).
Further, ACM-induced nitric oxide synthesis, mediated
through macrophage mannose receptors and macrophage
activation, may also be responsible for immunomodulatory effects in chickens (Karaca et al., 1995). Ethanolic
extract administered chickens showed signicantly higher
(p < 0.05) response as compared to aqueous extract at 24 h
post-PHA-P injection. The higher response may be due
to the lipid components from the cell membranes of A.
vera, solubilized by alcoholic treatment (Reynolds, 2004)
which enhanced the phagocytic activity of macrophages
and release of cytokines (Zhang and Tizard, 1996).
Oral administration of A. vera extracts resulted in
higher anti-SRBC antibody (total Igs, IgM and IgG) titers
as compared to control, indicating their stimulatory effects
on humoral immunity. The activity of the A. vera to
stimulate humoral response may be due to aloeride (a
polysaccharide from A. vera) that induces the activity
of IL-6, a potent B-cell stimulant, to produce antibodies
(Tan and Vanitha, 2004).
In the challenge experiment, mean OPG in the control group was signicantly higher (p < 0.05) as compared
to chickens in both the experimental groups. Chickens
administered with Aloe extracts showed lower mean lesion
scores as compared to control chickens both for ceacal and
intestinal lesions. A. vera contains anthraquinones, sterol,
sterol type 5 , saponins and carbohydrates (Vazquez
et al., 1996) that might have inhibited the multiplication of the Eimerian parasites leading to low OPG. In vitro
inhibitory effects of A. vera against coccidiosis in chickens have also been reported previously (Mwale et al.,
2006). Maximum protection (60%) was recorded in chickens administered with aqueous Aloe extract that may be
due to the high concentration of mucilagus components
and pectins with the potential to reduce inammation
due to their inhibitory action on the arachidonic acid
via cyclooxygenase pathways (Vazquez et al., 1996). On
the other hand, 20% protection was also observed in
the control group that might be due to the self-limiting
mechanism(s) of coccidiosis in chickens (Sharma, 1991).
Further, experimental chickens irrespective of the extract
they received were comparatively active with normal feed
and water intake and showed the least abnormal signs.
On the other hand, chickens in control groups were dull
and depressed with rufed feather and took less feed
and water that may be due to altered gut homeostasis (Kettunen et al., 2001) leading to poor feed intake,
metabolism and thus decreased weight gains (Adams et al.,
1996).

176

M. Akhtar et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 186 (2012) 170177

Results of the present study revealed no signicant difference (p > 0.05) in organbody weight ratio of all the
lymphoid organs indicating that Aloe extracts have no effect
on the development of lymphoid organs.
In the current study, elicited humoral response against
challenge species of Eimeria was noted in chickens administered with A. vera extracts as compared to those in the
control group. Recently, it has been reported that antibodies have a key role in protective immunity against
coccidial infection (Wallach, 2010). Moreover, antibodies
can efciently hinder the development of Eimeria in the
intestine (Rose, 1974). A positive correlation between antibody titer and protection against coccidiosis has also been
reported by Smith et al. (1994). In similar studies, antibodies have been described for inducing partial protective
passive immunity by blocking the growth, development
and replication of parasite (Crane et al., 1988; Hafeez et al.,
2007; Anwar et al., 2008). In the present study, the therapeutic efcacy of Aloe extracts may be attributed to their
stimulatory effects on the production of antibodies against
experimentally induced coccidiosis and thus leading to
higher weight gains and lower fecal egg count.
In conclusion, the results of the present study demonstrated that A. vera may be a potential and valuable
candidate to stimulate the immune responses in chickens and can be used successfully as an immunotherapeutic
agent against coccidiosis. Further, it can also be used as
a low cost alternative to allopathic drugs to control coccidiosis in chickens. Further studies on the isolation and
identication of its bioactive components responsible for
such activities are underway in our lab.
References
Adams, C., Vahl, H., Veldman, A., 1996. Interaction between nutrition and
Eimeria acervulina infection in broiler chickens: development of an
experimental infection model. Brit. J. Nutr. 75, 867873.
Anwar, M.I., Akhtar, M., Hussain, I., Haq, A.U., Muhammad, F., Hafeez, M.A.,
Mahmood, M.S., Bashir, S., 2008. Field evaluation of Eimeria tenella
(local isolates) gametocytes vaccine and its comparative efcacy with
imported live vaccine LivaCox. Parasitol. Res. 104, 135142.
A.O.A.C., 1980. Ofcial Methods of Analysis, 13th ed. Association of Ofcial
Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, USA.
Awais, M.M., Akhtar, M., Muhammad, F., Haq, A.U., Anwar, M.I., 2011.
Immunotherapeutic effects of some sugar cane (Saccharum ofcinarum L.) extracts against coccidiosis in industrial broiler chickens.
Exp. Parasitol. 128, 104110.
Ayaz, M.M., Akhtar, M., Hayat, C.S., Hafeez, M.A., Haq, A.U., 2003. Prevalence of coccidiosis in broiler chickens in Faisalabad, Pakistan. Pak.
Vet. J. 23, 5152.
Choi, S., Chung, M., 2003. A review on the relationship between Aloe vera
components and their biologic effects. Sem. Integ. Med. 1, 5362.
Chow, J.T.N., Williamson, D.A., Yates, K.M., Goux, W.J., 2005. Chemical
characterization of the immunomodulating polysaccharide of Aloe
vera L. Carbohydr. Res. 340, 11311142.
Corrier, D.E., 1990. Comparison of phytohemagglutinin-induced cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions in the interdigital skin of broiler and
layer chicks. Avian Dis. 34, 369373.
Crane, M.S., Goggin, B., Pellegrino, R.M., Ravino, O.J., Lange, C., Karkhanis,
Y.D., Kirk, K.E., Chakraborty, P.R., 1988. Passive protection of chickens against Eimeria tenella infection by monoclonal antibody. Infect.
Immun. 56, 972976.
Dalloul, R.A., Lillehoj, H.S., Shellem, T.A., Doerr, J.A., 2003. Intestinal
immunomodulation by vitamin A deciency and Lactobacillus-based
probiotic in Eimeria acervulina-infected broiler chickens. Avian Dis. 47,
13131320.
Dalloul, R.A., Lillehoj, H.S., 2006. Poultry coccidiosis: recent advancements
in control measures and vaccine development. Expert Rev. Vacc. 5,
143163.

Delespaux, V., Koning, H.D., 2007. Drugs and drug resistance in African
trypanosomiasis. Drug Resist. Updates 10, 3050.
Farnsworth, N.R., 1999. The role of ethnopharmacology in drug development. In: Anonymous (Ed.), Bioactive Compounds from Plants. Ciba
Foundation Symposium, Wiley Intersci., New York.
Femenia, A., Sanchez, E.S., Simal, S., Rossello, C., 1999. Compositional features of polysaccharides from Aloe vera (Aloe barbadensis Miller) plant
tissues. Carbohydr. Polym. 39, 109117.
Garcia, J.L., Navarro, I.T., Vidotto, O., Gennari, S.M., Machado, R.Z., Pereira,
A.B.L., Sinhorini, I.L., 2006. Toxoplasma gondii: comparison of a
rhoptry-ELISA with IFAT and MAT for antibody detection in sera of
experimentally infected pigs. Exp. Parasitol. 113, 100105.
Giamborne, J.J., Closser, J., 1990. Efcacy of live vaccine against serologic
subtypes of infectious bursal disease. Avian Dis. 34, 711.
Hafeez, M.A., Akhtar, M., Javed, M.T., Haq, A.U., 2007. Maternal immunization by egg propagated gametocyte vaccine to control Eimeria tenella
infections in newly hatched chicks. Parasitol. Res. 100, 11391141.
Johnson, J., Reid, W.M., 1970. Anticoccidial drugs: lesion scoring techniques in battery and oor pen experiments with chickens. Exp.
Parasitol. 28, 3036.
Karaca, K., Sharma, J.M., Nordgren, R., 1995. Nitric oxide production by
chicken macrophages activated by Acemannan, a complex carbohydrate extracted from Aloe vera. Int. J. Immunopharmacol. 17, 183188.
Kettunen, H., Tiihonen, K., Peuranen, S., Saarinen, M.T., Remus, J.C., 2001.
Dietary betaine accumulates in the liver and intestinal tissue and
stabilizes the intestinal epithelial structure in healthy and coccidiainfected broiler chicks. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A: Mol. Integ.
Physiol. 130, 759769.
Kil, L.C., 2006. New Perspectives on Aloe. College of Pharmacy, Chungbuk
National University Press, South Korea.
Kundu, A., Singh, D.P., Mohapatra, S.C., Dash, B.B., Moudgal, R.P., Bisht,
G.S., 1999. Antibody response to sheep erythrocytes in Indian native
vis--vis imported breeds of chickens. Brit. Poult. Sci. 40, 4043.
Levine, N.D., 1961. The Protozoan Parasite of Domestic Animals and Man.
Burgess Publication Company, Minnesota, USA.
Lillehoj, H.S., Trout, J.M., 1996. Avian gut-associated lymphoid tissues and
intestinal immune responses to Eimeria parasites. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
9, 349360.
Madan, J., Sharma, A.K., Inamdar, N., Rao, H.S., Singh, R., 2008.
Immunomodulatory properties of Aloe vera gel in mice. Int. J. Green
Pharm. 2, 152154.
Martin, A., Danforth, H., Barta, J., Fernando, M., 1997. Analysis of immunological cross-protection and sensitivities to anticoccidial drugs among
ve geographical and temporal strains of Eimeria maxima. Int. J. Parasitol. 27, 527533.
Mehala, C., Moorthy, M., 2008. Effect of Aloe vera and Curcuma longa
(Turmeric) on carcass characteristics and biochemical parameters of
broilers. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 7, 857861.
Mwale, M., Bhebhe, E., Chimonyo, M., Halimani, T.E., 2006. The in vitro
studies on the effect of Aloe vera ((L.) webb. and berth.) and Aloe spicata
(L.f.) on the control of coccidiosis in chickens. Int. J. Appl. Res. Vet. Med.
4, 25.
Nundkumar, N., Ojewole, J.A.O., 2002. Studies on the antiplasmodial properties of some South African medicinal plants used as antimalarial
remedies in Zulu folk medicine. Clin. Pharmacol. 24, 397401.
Pandey, R., Mishra, A., 2010. Antibacterial activities of crude extract of Aloe
barbadensis to clinically isolated bacterial pathogens. Appl. Biochem.
Biotechnol. 160, 13561361.
Patwardhan, B., Gautam, M., 2005. Botanical immunodrugs: scope and
opportunities. Drug Discov. Ther. 10, 495501.
Qureshi, M.A., Havenstein, G.B., 1994. A comparison of the immune performance of a 1991 commercial broiler with a 1957 randombred
strain when fed typical 1957 and 1991 broiler diets. Poult. Sci. 73,
18051812.
Reid, W.M., Long, P.L., 1979. A diagnostic chart for nine species of fowl
coccidia. Research Report. University of Georgia.
Reig, M., Toldra, F., 2008. Veterinary drug residues in meat: concerns and
rapid methods for detection. Meat Sci. 78, 6067.
Reynolds, T., 2004. Aloe chemistry. In: Reynolds, T. (Ed.), Aloes: The Genus
Aloe. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 3974.
Reynolds, T., Dweck, A.C., 1999. Aloe vera leaf gel: a review update. J.
Ethnopharmacol. 68, 3337.
Rose, M.E., 1974. Protective antibodies in infections with Eimeria maxima:
the reduction of pathogenic effects in vivo and a comparison between
oral and subcutaneous administration of antiserum. Parasitology 68,
285292.
Ryley, J.F., Meade, R., Ifazulburst, J., Robinson, T.E., 1976. Methods in coccidiosis research: separation of oocyst from faeces. Parasitology 73,
311326.

M. Akhtar et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 186 (2012) 170177

SAS , 2004. Statistical Software Version 9.1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC,
USA.
Saxena, V.K., Singh, H., Pai, S.K., Kumar, S., 1997. Genetic studies on primary
antibody response to sheep erythrocytes in guinea fowl. Brit. Poult. Sci.
38, 156158.
Shah, M.A.A., Song, X., Xu, L., Yan, R., Song, H., Ruirui, Z., Chengyu, L., Li, X.,
2009. The DNA-induced protective immunity with chickens interferon
gamma against poultry coccidiosis. Parasitol. Res. 107, 747750.
Sharma, J.M., 1991. Avian Cellular Immunology. CRC Press, Inc., 2000.Corporate Blvd., N.W., Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Smith, N.C., Wallach, M., Petracca, M., Braun, R., Eckert, J., 1994. Maternal transfer of antibodies induced by infection with Eimeria maxima
partially protects chickens against challenge with Eimeria tenella. Parasitology 109, 551557.
Stanic, S., 2007. Anti-genotoxic effect of Aloe vera gel on the mutagenic
action of ethyl methanesulfonate. Arch. Biol. Sci. 59, 223226.
Talmadge, J., Chavez, J., Jacobs, L., Munger, C., Chinnah, T., Chow, J.T.,
Williamson, D., Yates, K., 2004. Fractionation of Aloe vera inner gel,
purication and molecular proling of activity. Int. Immunopharmacol. 4, 17571773.
Tan, B.K.H., Vanitha, J., 2004. Immunomodulatory and antimicrobial
effects of some traditional Chinese medicinal herbs: a review. Curr.
Med. Chem. 11, 14231430.
Vazquez, B., Avila, G., Segura, D., Escalante, B., 1996. Anti-inammatory
activity of extracts from Aloe vera gel. Int. J. Ethnopharmacol. 55,
6975.

177

Wallach, M., 2010. Role of antibody in immunity and control of chickens coccidiosis: a review. Trends Parasitol. 26,
382387.
Williams, R.B., 1999. A compartmentalised model for the estimation o f
the cost of coccidiosis to the worlds chicken production industry. Int.
J. Parasitol. 29, 12091229.
Womble, D., Helderman, J.H., 1988. Enhancement of allo-responsiveness
of human lymphocytes by acemannan. Int. J. Immunopharmacol. 10,
967973.
Womble, D., Helderman, J.H., 1992. The impact of acemannan on the generation and function of cytotoxic T-lymphocytes. Immunopharmacol.
Immunotoxicol. 14, 6377.
Yamamoto, K., 1996. Elimination of minimal residual leukemic
cells by biological response modiers. Rinsho Ketsueki 37,
666670.
Yamamoto, Y., Glick, B., 1982. A comparison of the immune
response between two lines of chickens selected for differences in the weight of the bursa of fabricius. Poult. Sci. 61,
21292132.
Yim, D., Kang, S.S., Kim, D.W., Kim, S.H., Lillehoj, H.S., Min, W.,
2010. Protective effects of Aloe vera-based diets in Eimeria maxima-infected broiler chickens. Exp. Parasitol. 127,
322325.
Zhang, L., Tizard, I.R., 1996. Activation of a mouse macrophage cell line
by acemannan: the major carbohydrate fraction from Aloe vera gel.
Immunopharmacology 35, 119128.