Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Abstract
The development of the corporate university is an element in the suite of economically rational
public policy changes promulgated in recent decades. Working from a position that the practice of
accounting is centrally implicated in these changes, it is contended in this paper that accounting, and
accounting education, can in fact play a part in challenging these positions. Extant accounting research
is sufficiently well-developed such that we are aware of the conflicts and contradictions both within
accounting and flowing from the practice of the discipline, yet the effect of this body of knowledge
on the content of teaching and learning within the accounting classroom remains limited. By and
large, accounting education continues to be constrained within narrowly defined, but mis-conceived,
disciplinary boundaries, focusing on the techniques and skills of accounting practice.
In outlining a case for broadening the accounting education curriculum, this paper adopts the heuristic of tangential thinking as a means of transcending narrowly constructed disciplinary boundaries.
In doing so, it is suggested that accounting education reform needs to go well beyond the putative
reform agenda of the organised professional accounting bodies.
The exploration of tangents lead to areas of knowledge that initially seem to be outside of accounting,
but which nevertheless have an integral connection to the realities of the practice of the discipline.
The paper outlines a case for tangential thinking in teaching and learning activities in the accounting
classroom, within extant accreditation and curricular arrangements. Teaching and learning outside the
circle in this manner is suggested as a way to make accounting education relevant in its socio-historical
context and, particularly, relevant to the lived experience of students.
2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Critical accounting; Corporate university; Accounting research; Accounting education; Intellectuals
1045-2354/$ see front matter 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/S1045-2354(03)00047-9
566
567
568
outside the policies and practices of the discipline as such. In contradistinction, I outline
a case for consciously adopting tangential thinking as a heuristic for the transcendence of
mis-conceived, narrowly constructed disciplinary boundaries.
The remainder of the paper is divided into four sections. The next section briefly contextualises accounting education by considering the role of universities in changing times and
the interplay between universities and social change, showing that the dialectical interplay
between the university as a social institution and society itself remains a source of possibility
for the creation of alternative futures. This is followed by a short outline of the present state
of accounting education, incorporating the now-established reform agenda emanating from
the organised accounting profession. The third section, on practising critical accounting
education, outlines how academics themselves might respond to this state of affairs in a
critical way, making a case for broadening the ambit of accounting education. The notion
of tangents, as areas of knowledge that seem outside of accounting, but which have an
integral connection to accounting, is used to make a case for the practice of critical accounting education within extant broad accreditation and curricular frameworks. It is noted that
accounting academics who tread the critical accounting path with their students are likely
to encounter resistance in this endeavour, but the implications for academics of not doing
so, are discussed in the concluding section.
569
(Fukuyama, 1992). Whilst change-inducing crises can last for long periods, and can be
effectively rebutted or suppressed in the short term, they cannot be eliminated in the longer
term (Amin, 1998; Habermas, 1973; OConnor, 1973). Indeed, an open question remains as
to whether university change is a tool of capitalism in adapting to new social and economic
circumstances or whether a wider project for the creation of a different social order emerges
(with universities being a part of this project).
The role of intellectuals is important in articulating any movement for change. The quest
for a new society requires intellectuals to articulate the social and cultural contradictions
of the prevailing order and to harness the creative impulses of a range of alternatives:
The principal agents are intellectuals who have a specialized responsibility for the circulation and development of culture and ideology and who either align themselves with the
existing dispositions of social and intellectual forces (traditional intellectuals) or align
themselves with the emerging popular forces and seek to elaborate new currents of ideas
(organic intellectuals) (Hall, 1996, pp. 432433).
It follows from the above that change in universities is not likely to occur without concomitant change in society. The interplay between the two remains a source of creative
possibility. Change in accounting and accounting education represents one small part of
this larger picture; consequently accounting academics need to consciously position themselves in the larger social context within which change might occur.
570
This is at odds with the acknowledged limits of education dominated by vocational considerations (see, for example, Aronowitz, 2000; Preston, 1992; Tinker and Koutsoumadi,
1997).2 The narrowness of the vocational approach to accounting education is doubly flawed
because it is based on the mistaken assumption that the future vocation of accounting students will be professional careers in accounting per se. This stands in stark contrast to
the reality of downsizing and deskilling in accounting work, which means that most accounting graduates will face a markedly different future (see Cooper and Tinker, 1998).
Many will never work in professional accounting practice, or, indeed, in any form of
accounting (see Tinker and Koutsoumadi, 1997, 1998). All will have to face the emergent
jobless (diFazio, 1998; Esposito et al., 1998), joyless (Tinker and Koutsoumadi, 1998),
and commodified (Tinker and Koutsoumadi, 1997) future. The accounting education reform agenda is ignorant of these aspects of the reality to be faced by current students of
accounting.
Whilst accounting education is not unique in its vocational emphasis,3 it does present a
particular case in point. Whether they recognise or accept it, academic accountants have
a particular responsibility that flows from the central role of their discipline in creating
and sustaining social reality, including the present dominance of economic rationalism (see
for example, Berry et al., 1985; Boden et al., 1998; Davids and Hancock, 1998; Guthrie,
1999; Reiter, 1997). In the present specific context, accounting has been a significant tool
in contemporary attacks on universities and on the role of academics (see Dominelli and
Hoogvelt, 1996). Flowing from this, it is reasonable to assign a degree of responsibility to
accounting academics for the present state of affairs, not only in accounting education, but
in universities themselves, and in society more generally. It is also reasonable to assign to
them some responsibility for developing positions that challenge this state of affairs.
The vocationalism of accounting education is not a recent problem. Parker (2001, p. 441, drawing on Previts
and Merino, 1979) notes that in the United States, when accounting was first taught in universities early in the
20th century, academics were criticised (by practitioners!) for taking a narrow, technical, practice oriented focus
at the expense of a more conceptually based analytical education. The technicist, vocational approach prevailed
at the time, and has dominated university accounting education ever since.
3 University teaching across the board at the present time seems to be increasingly focussed on training students
in occupational skills, socialising them into the extant social arrangements, and preparing a ready supply of future
labour (Aronowitz, 2000). Gray and Collison (2002) suggest that the malady in accounting education affects a
number of comparable professional domains.
571
572
573
environment. This external element is broadly outside the purview of the disciplines inside
the organisation, including accounting conventionally conceived, except insofar as there is
a direct impact inside the (perceived, constructed) boundary.
By contrast, Fig. 2 develops the depiction in Fig. 1 to include within the purview of
accounting its socio-historical setting. Notable features of this characterisation are: indefinite and permeable entity and disciplinary boundaries (broken lines); only a small area of
interest contained within the boundaries (however, drawn) of each system and subsystem
this smallness being relative to what might be referred to as the universe of interest; and a
specific recognition of what is outside the organisational boundary (wherever it might be)
under various specific topics of interest. This latter aspect is perhaps the most significant:
the environment is no longer a nefarious or amorphous thing outside the organisation to
be dealt with, but something that takes on a distinct and explorable form, with definite and
identifiable conditions and effects. The range of (environmental) topics of interest outside
the (perceived boundaries of the) organisation are tangentially connected (the emphasis
being on the connections) to what happens inside the organisation, and, specifically, inside
accounting. In this sense, what may have initially seemed outside of accounting turns out,
on exploration, to be integral to it. As Dillard comments, such considerations are, indeed,
an important part of the subject matter of accounting:
. . . a faculty member must critically, logically, analytically and continually explore all
aspects of the subject matter including the theoretical base, historical and social context,
574
Fig. 2. Many tangents to travel: a broader, tangential view of a business entitys system and its environment.
technical content and societal implications. As a consequence, inequalities, power structures and systemic weaknesses become more difficult to rationalise. (Dillard and Tinker,
1996, p. 222)
Going off on what may seem to be tangents is therefore an essential element of a meaningful and comprehensive consideration of accounting itself. In establishing and interrogating
these connections and the divergent aspects of accounting, flying off at a tangent represents socio-historically informed critique in a very real sense. In this model, going off on
tangents become an essential aspect of accounting, just as accounting practice has a range
of immediate and not-so-immediate effects. This divergence from the established norm of
what is deemed to be within accounting simply recognises integral connections between
accounting and elsewhere.
In sum, by comparison with Fig. 1, Fig. 2 more closely reflects the reality of the influence
and power of accounting in society and in the lives of participants in accounting classes
(teachers and students). This approach brings a range of relevant issues into the accounting
575
classroom, and provides the opportunity for the critical discussion of a range of issues
that are often no-go areas within any subject area normally included within commerce
or business degrees (not just accounting). Perhaps most importantly, tangential thinking
facilitates exploration of a range of areas impacting on the daily lives of academics, students,
their families and colleaguesimpacts that flow from the uses of accounting.
Tangential thinking presents the ideal opportunity for the kind of dialogical education
advocated by Freire (1996), where teachers and students jointly explore, discover, and
grow in consciousness. The range of possible tangents for consideration facilitates much
more exploratory and interactive forms of knowledge acquisition, validating the voice of the
learner in interaction with that of the teacher (see Aronowitz and Giroux, 1991, pp. 100103;
Freire, 1996).4 All of this provides the possibility that learners will:
. . . appropriate critically the best dimensions of their own histories, experiences, and
culture . . . in an institution that breaks down the wall between vocational and academic
education, bringing students to the threshold of the world of work with a broadly based
education in both aspects of . . . knowledge. (Aronowitz and Giroux, 1993, p. 23)
Tangential approaches to teaching and learning can utilise a range of classroom strategies
and tactics in a number of different teaching modes. Perhaps most significant in this context
is not specific strategies and tactics per se, but the teaching and learning philosophy which
sees classroom activity as much more than training for work and skill development.
Classroom activity in this approach connects the domain of specific studyaccountingto
the wider real world as experienced, but perhaps not well understood, by all involved in
the activity. Drawing tangentially, with a diverse array of areas for considered exploration,
it is possible to connect with the ordinary feelings and experiences which students have in
their lives outside the classroom and thereby to get in touch with lived reality and bring the
historical and contemporary social underpinnings of accounting practice into the classroom.
Students can articulate their own common sense knowledge with a more encompassing and
enlightened social consciousness (see Hall, 1988, p. 171), whilst seeking to transcend the
limitations of their pre-existing understandings. As McLaren points out, these connections
to common sense and lived experience are important because:
Knowledge is relevant only when it begins with the experiences students bring with
them from the surrounding culture; it is critical only when these experiences are shown
sometimes to be problematic . . . and it is transformative only when students begin to
use the knowledge to help empower others, including individuals in the surrounding
community. (McLaren, 1998, p. 192)
Fig. 3 provides some examples of specific tangential connections that might be explored
in accounting classes. All of these connections, which might initially seem tangential, are
now well-established in the accounting research literature as being a part of the practice of accounting. Thus, this research literature represents an established and developing
4 Although the value of instruction and even propaganda (in the non-pejorative sense) as a part of education
as consciousness-raising should not be entirely ignored in a rush to dialogic pedagogy (Freire, 1996; cf Gramsci,
1971, pp. 3536; Gramsci in Forgacs, 1999, pp. 6768).
576
knowledge base that can form the basis for exploration and further building in the accounting classroom.
4.3. Acting within present curricular arrangements
Many accounting educators have made a start, with the presentation or exploration of
alternative and critical perspectives in some specialist or elective courses in subject areas
such as environmental and social accounting (see Bebbington, 1995, 1997; Gibson, 1997).
However, such courses are invariably taken by a relatively small number of students who
are already motivated and at least to some degree aware of pertinent issues (Collison et al.,
2000). This limits the potential of such courses to bring critical accounting to a mass
accounting audience. Whilst the potential value of such courses in presenting alternative
views and in sowing small seeds for change cannot be denied, it should also be recognised
that even education under the rubric of social and environmental accounting might have
the effect of sustaining the status quo (see Tinker et al., 1991).
In any case, opportunities for individual academics to offer specialist elective courses
are constrained by specific departmental situations within which individuals work. Many
577
academics spend much of their teaching time in core or compulsory courses in introductory,
financial, or managerial accounting, and it is here that the challenge of developing a critical
accounting education remains. Fig. 3 indicates how this can be done within the broad
parameters of standard or core courses such as management accounting, accounting systems,
or auditing. Care is required, however. The adding-on of professional ethics or similar
modules (see, for example, Clikeman and Henning, 2000; Fulmer and Cargile, 1987) may
help, but may also reinforce a vocational orientation if ethics are themselves uncritically
presented in an instrumental or vocationally oriented fashion.5
In short, where critical accounting education is an elective or add-on to otherwise unchanged mainstream content, it might also be deemed to be peripheral to the main game
of an accounting qualification (Humphrey et al., 1996) and therefore of marginal import.
However, there is considerable scope for accounting academics, within the rubric of the current accounting curriculum and curricular and accreditation arrangements to directly draw
on and explore socio-historical knowledge of the functioning of accounting in an integral
and integrated manner.
While educators at all levels have been subject to systematic and sustained attempts to
disempower them in relation to their control over teaching and learning,6 much control remains in the hands of academics, particularly at university level. Continued academic control
over teaching and learning is crucial to the long-term health of universities (Aronowitz,
2000, p. 34). The role of lecturers in syllabus design, text selection, setting assessable work,
assessment of student work, and, importantly, fronting classes, remains significant, and the
challenge is to make space in all of these activities for critical work. In accounting, it is
perhaps contradictory that the capacity of accounting academics to act may be enhanced by
the accounting professions official accreditation of university accounting courses. Parker
(2001, p. 443) makes the important point that, even under relatively tight accreditation arrangements, the quantum of technicist material that we currently deliver in undergraduate
courses is not sacrosanct . . . ; this means that there is considerable room for innovative
practice within existing constraints.7
The profession has emphasised the development of generic skills in its accreditation
requirements. These skills include analytical and critical thinking skills, judgement and
synthesis skills, personal and interpersonal skills, management and organisational skills,
and the ability to apply these skills in a range of unique situations (e.g. see Accounting
Education Change Commission, 1990; Bedford et al., 1986; Deppe et al., 1991). Taken
in any meaningful sense, the wide ambit of this list of skills precludes the adoption of a
narrow objective-based, vocationally oriented training model, and the specific inclusion
of critical thinking skills, which involve skillful judgement as to truth, merit, etc. . . . a
5
But cf. McPhail (2001b), Puxty et al. (1994) and Neimark (1995), for example.
These attempts have been characterised by the imposition of standardised curricula and testing in primary
and secondary schools, and have had the effect of deskilling teaching work and reducing teacher autonomy to a
particular degree, to the substantial detriment of education itself (see Aronowitz and Giroux, 1993).
7 It will be noted that this discussion relates the significant control academics retain in relation to many of
those elements of university life that have changed in recent times, as outlined in the introduction to the paper. This signals the possibility that a degree of academic passivity and resignation in the face of seemingly
powerful forces may be partly to blame for the current state of affairs (but c.f. Tinker and Feknous, 2001, for
example).
6
578
critical analysis (Macquarie Dictionary, 1991), provides not only the opportunity, but the
necessity for developing a capacity for critique.
Any critique in and of accounting must involve upsetting received notions. This has been
described as making the familiar strange (see Chua, 1998; Merino, 1998), and may include
locating the development and use of accounting systems, technologies, and associated policies, procedures, and practices in their organisational, social, and ethical contexts. It may
involve identifying and questioning underlying assumptions and examining and interrogating the justifications and explanations offered by others. This should involve subjecting
accounting systems, technologies, policies, procedures, and practices to scrutiny insofar as
they have real direct and indirect consequences for social actors and groups. The interests
of various (different) parties (including students, in varying aspects of their lives) should
be considered and challenged.
The distinction drawn by Aronowitz and Giroux (1993) between intelligence and
intellect is useful in considering the development of higher order critical skills. The
development of critical skills in the classroom must reach beyond the narrowness of the
intelligence of routinised, instrumental knowledge. Intelligence is employed within a narrow, immediate range to grasp, manipulate, reorder, adjust while intellect is critical and
creative insofar as it examines, ponders, wonders, theorizes, criticizes, imagines. In this
sense, intellectthe stuff of intellectualsand not expertise or credentials, is central to
critical accounting.
4.4. Encountering resistance2
Accounting academics who seek to broaden the perceived disciplinary boundaries within
which they work will face undoubted resistance in this endeavourfrom both students and
academic colleagues.
4.4.1. Student resistance
The great bulk of accounting students may not initially seek or appreciate the consciousness-raising, engaging, enlightening, and emancipatory critique that might be offered in
critical accounting classes. They may even resent being confronted with it. Indeed, it
is likely that this will be the case, given the non-creative, rote-learning, practice-oriented,
bean counting stereotype, which many students seem to associate with accounting (see
Cory, 1992; Inman et al., 1989). Prior education and self-selection into accounting programs
means that accounting students are likely to be well-versed and oriented to the links between
accounting and their possible roles as investors and managers of various sorts, but less so
to the links with their roles as citizens, family-members, and workers.8 This means that
the ideological function of accounting, which attaches itself to the former, can be at least
partially overcome by making the explicit links to the latter.
8 Students choosing an accounting major are predisposed to view the learning of accounting as consisting of
rote memorisation and are least likely to believe that an important or essential goal of education is to increase
self-directed learning, to develop clear thinking capability, or to develop creative capacities (Gow et al., 1994;
Inman et al., 1989, p. 44). Students who choose social and environmental accounting electives tend to be more
concerned about ethical issues, than the greater number of students who choose not to undertake such electives.
Research suggests this latter group are much more career oriented and they feel social and environmental accounting
will be of less relevance to them in this arena (Collison et al., 2000).
579
The seeming natural, but narrow, connection of the accounting discipline to the world of
commerce and management amplifies the problem, and students may well be motivated by
career-focused, economically centred aspirations. Nevertheless, this is in itself a product
of ideology, given that the major way in which ideologies (in the pejorative sense) have
traditionally maintained themselves is by harnessing what are in themselves perfectly legitimate human aspirations . . . (Geuss, 1981, p. 25), in this case, the aspiration for individual,
social and economic well-being.
Further, the very nature of the broader system of education includes the fundamental
socialisation of students to the values of the extant social system, including notions of
individualism and individual responsibility and an acceptance of inequality as natural
(Byrne, 1999, especially Chap. 1; Gramsci in Forgacs, 1999, pp. 6467). Students are denied
the opportunity (which can also be a life burden) for self-formation and self-actualisation
(Freire, 1996; McPhail, 2001a). The prior submersion of students in the reality of an
oppressive system and their internalisation of the values of that system means that they are
initially unable to see that reality, and they fear the freedom that a challenge to it entails
(Freire, 1996, Chap. 1). Anything that seems to challenge the present social arrangements is,
at least initially, upsetting, and is likely to be resisted. The resentment is an understandable
response, given the internal self-contradiction many students are asked to face between the
varying roles they play in life:
Class conflict is not a conflict between individuals but between social role aggregates in which individuals participate in several, often conflicting, roles as investors,
workers, community members, consumers, managers etc. By engaging the same dispute through conflicting roles, an individual may ultimately contribute to his/her own
exploitation . . . (Tinker et al., 1991, p. 30)
Accounting is conventionally portrayed as being unproblematically connected only to a
narrow spectrum of these conflicting roles, but the interconnections, conflicts, and immanent
contradictions of accounting itself mean that this is not a sustainable position.
Whilst the stereotypical view of the accountant as bean counter does little to attract
creatively oriented students to accounting studies in the first instance (Cory, 1992; Saemann
and Crooker, 1999), the perceived quality of students themselves is not the key issue.
Ruminating about this lack of quality (e.g. Cory, 1992; Graves et al., 1992; Inman et al.,
1989; Sharma, 1998) fails to address the here-and-now: how can we best serve the students
we have, and society, in the time we have with them?9
4.4.2. Academic resistance
Accounting academics, too, play conflicting roles. Most, of course, are themselves the
product of conventional accounting education programs, into which they self-selected, with
pre-existing stereotypes about accounting, and they have been socialised into the existing
system through their own education. While accounting educators (and practitioners) are
9 I should note that my own experience suggests that a cross-section of students from a wide variety of professional, socioeconomic, and cultural backgrounds are highly receptive to critical content in accounting curricula and
capable of engaging with it. This is particularly the case where the material is incorporated in a way that resonates
with the daily experiences of students, including their interaction with the world around them, and elaborates the
contradictory aspects of those experiences and that world.
580
implicated in the reproduction of the social system, it does not necessarily follow that they
are themselves committed to that system: . . . they also experience ideology in its various
material forms (Roslender, 1992, p. 202). As Marx commented: . . . it is essential to
educate the educator himself . . . self-changing can be conceived and rationally understood
only as revolutionary practice (Marx, 1970, p. 121, original emphasis).
This means that there are considerable personal barriers to be overcome before the
consciousness-raising potential of accounting education is likely to be able to be meaningfully tackled by any accounting teacher. Principal amongst the barriers is the very orientation
of many academics themselves, who consciously or unconsciously align themselves with
the social reality that conventional accounting reproduces10 (see Dominelli and Hoogvelt,
1996). Committed disturbers of the peace (Craig et al., 1999) or confronters of orthodoxy
and dogma (Sikka et al., 1995) are few and far between:
This is a rapidly dwindling residue of academics who remain wedded to their conception
of themselves as change agents and critical thinkers working with social groups or communities for a better world. Their task is to mobilise those in favour of changing the status
quo. This group is relatively impotent at the moment because they have limited grassroots
support and critical intellectual activity has become a devalued activity, carried out in
their spare time, at night and on weekends. (Dominelli and Hoogvelt, 1996, pp. 208209)
Transformational education cannot take place unless academics themselves are transformed (see Dillard and Tinker, 1996, p. 221). Facing students who are uncomfortable
with the challenge of critical accounting is only part of the problem; our greater challenge
lies with ourselves and our colleagues. The challenges and choices are open: accounting
academics, as intellectuals, can make their expertise principally available to and for professional bodies, the accountancy industry, big business, and government; or they may seek to
engage more directly with the values of fairness, justice, democratic participation, openness
and accountability (see Sikka et al., 1995).
Resistance to critical accounting from within the accounting academy itself is unlikely to
be overcome in the short term, but there remains considerable scope for critical accounting
educators. Whatever the state of the accounting academy generally, and the prior expectations of accounting students, there is much that can be done by the individual lecturer or
tutor within their own classes. In addition to the priors students bring, perceptions about
accounting are formed in the accounting classroom (Friedlan, 1995). Consequently, teaching and learning activity can do much to bring students to a conscious awareness of the
socio-historical aspects of accounting, its contingency and partisanship, and of their own
place within that system.
5. Implications: accepting intellectual responsibility
Wherever, and however, accounting students work in their post-graduation lives, the practice of accounting will be used in ways that have direct effects on them, their local communities, and communities of interest across the globe. Accounting students/graduates are as
10 In Gramscian terms, these are those who seek the role of traditional intellectuals or hegemonic organic intellectuals (Gramsci, 1971).
581
likely to have accounting done to them as by them. The narrowness of conventional accounting education, which prepares students only for an assumed future career in the practice of
the discipline, focusing on a managerial, corporate perspective, and privileging the preparers and immediate users of accounting reports hardly seems relevant in these circumstances.
The perspective of accounting from a broad user perspective, or, even, that of accountings
victims, including those not involved in ownership or management, is more directly relevant.
Rather than an excessive focus on the minutiae of this and that aspect of technical
accounting procedures, relevant accounting education must prepare students for informed
action in and on the world. This must include a developing understanding of the relation
of accounting to the mundane activities, language, and interactions of daily life engaged
in by both academics and students, and how these relate to the larger social system within
which they are embedded. It is in this realm that ideas, conceptions, and consciousness itself
are produced, effected, and reproduced (Marx and Engels, 1970, p. 47). However, critical
accounting thought extends well beyond the life of individuals: social life and the lives of
others, including their ideas, hopes and sufferings, are equally important considerations,
because every person is a citizen of a wider world (Gramsci in Forgacs, 1999, p. 68).
The social implications of accounting education have assumed greater significance in
recent times, as a growing proportion of accounting practitioners carry formal university
qualifications. This has meant that an accounting mentality consistent with the dominant
world view throughout society is growing in importance (Booth and Cocks, 1990, p. 400;
see Gray and Collison, 2002). Indeed, in the present context, it is evident that the monolingual mentality and worldview represented by mainstream accounting (see Chua, 1996) is
writ large in the corporatised university.
Individual accounting academics might deny responsibility by asserting that it is someone elses job to consider the social, environmental, ideological, and political dimensions
of accounting, but the obvious response to such a position is who could be regarded as more
responsible for this than accounting educators themselves? The professional accreditation
arrangements, which facilitate the inclusion of critical content within a broader purview of
what accounting actually is, do represent something of a contradiction:
. . . there is the question of how creative to those who employ accountants really want
them to be? Few if any prospective employers would deny that they are seeking adaptable,
dynamic, inventive, open-minded, lateral thinking, etc., staff. But . . . these qualities, if
widely distributed, might prove problematic given the existence of the social and technical
divisions of labour, the general application of accounting formulae, the intrusion of
politics and so on. One of the dangers of encouraging students to think about accountancy
is that they might be tempted to think about other things as well. (Roslender, 1992, p. 208)
In this regard, the ostensible and official commitment to the development of accountants
as broadly educated and creative critical thinkers could be motivated by rhetoric, ideology,
or a genuine commitment to criticism and critique. Whatever the motivation, formal accreditation arrangements, along with the academic freedom that remains with academics, allow
for the traditional socialisation roles of accounting education to be transcended. Extant social structures will be nurtured, on the one hand, in an absence of consciousness of their
causes, effects, and contingency, and, on the other hand, action based on that consciousness.
For accounting educators, the acknowledged role of accounting in social production and
582
reproduction means that accounting itself is a part of this domain. An educational project
for change in accounting can interact with broader social change which, in turn, brings
systematic change to education (see Freire, 1996; Gramsci, 1971).
Those academics who fail to consciously make choices between reproducing the system
(and its inherent problems and injustices) or taking an active role in the creation of alternatives, or who endeavour to take pragmatic middle of the road or pluralistic positions,
championing moderation, consensus and compliance, will tend to act in ways that have
the effect of sustaining, protecting, and preserving the status quo (Tinker, 1986; Tinker et al.,
1991, p. 29). It is not possible to assume away the political content of education:
Educators at all levels . . . have to be seen as intellectuals, who as mediators, legitimators, and producers of ideas and social practices, perform a pedagogical function that is
eminently political in nature. (Aronowitz and Giroux, 1993, p. 31)
None of this should be taken to suggest that enlightened accounting educators can save
the world. But they can play a part, and accounting educators must constantly address
the question of how their own time, effort, and dedication as intellectuals might make a
contribution to a larger process:
The fact is that only by degrees, one stage at a time, has humanity acquired consciousness
of its own value and won for itself the right to throw off the patterns of organization
imposed on it by minorities at a previous period in history. And this consciousness was
formed not under the brutal goad of psychological necessity, but as a result of intelligent
reflection, at first by just a few people and later by a whole class, on why certain conditions
exist and how best to convert the facts of vassalage into the signals of rebellion and social
reconstruction . . . (Gramsci in Forgacs, 1999, p. 58)
In the accounting classroom, teaching and learning outside the circlegoing off on
tangentsis a way that accounting educators can bring a broader, socio-historically informed definition of accounting to students and teachers alike, creating possibilities for the
development of a socially relevant accounting education. Exploring and explaining what
might seem prima facie tangential to accounting itself actually creates space for considering the links between accounting and the lived reality faced by students. Such educational
content and process has the potential to be transformational for students and teachers, and,
through them, for the larger social system. It can thereby be genuinely critical.
Acknowledgements
The author is grateful to Cindy Davids, Bill Blair, and Kala Saravanamuthu for their
helpful comments.
References
Accounting Education Change Commission. Objectives of education for accountants: Position Statement Number
One. Issues Acc Educ 1990;5(2): 30712.
583
Adams C, Harte G. Making discrimination visible: the potential for social accounting. Acc Forum 2000;24(1):56
79.
Alexander D. Globalisation of Edu-biz. Social Alternatives 1996;15(1):3841.
Amin S. Spectres of Capitalism: a critique of current intellectual fashions. New York: Monthly Review Press;
1998.
Arnold P, Hammond T. The role of accounting in ideological conflict: lessons from the South African divestment
movement. Acc, Organ Soc 1994;19(2):11126.
Aronowitz S. The knowledge factory: dismantling the corporate university and creating true higher learning.
Boston: Beacon Press; 2000.
Aronowitz S. The last good job in America: work and education in the new global technoculture. Lanham,
Maryland: Rowtnan & Littlefield; 2001.
Aronowitz S, Giroux HA. Postmodern education: politics, culture, and social criticism. Minneapolis: University
of Minnesota Press; 1991.
Aronowitz S, Giroux HA. Education still under siege. Westport, Con.: Bergin & Garvey; 1993.
Baker CR. Whether there is an accounting profession? A commentary on Whither (or wither) accounting education
in the new millennium by M.R. Mathews. Acc Forum 2001;25(4):4024.
Bebbington J. Teaching social and environmental accounting: a review essay. Acc Forum 1995;19(2/3):2634.
Bebbington J. Engagement, education and sustainability: a review essay on environmental accounting. Acc, Aud
Accountability J 1997;10(3):36581.
Bedford N, Batholemew EE, Bowsher CA, Brown AL, Davidson S, Horngren CT, et al. Future accounting
education: preparing for the profession (The special report of the American Accounting Association Committee
on the future structure, content, and scope of Accounting Education). Issues Acc Educ 1986;1(1):16895.
Bellamy S. Ten years of pressure: changing the institutions. Australian Acc 1996;66(9):223.
Berry AJ, Capps T, Cooper D, Ferguson P, Hopper T, Lowe EA. Management control in an area of the NCB:
rationales of accounting practices in a public enterprise. Acc, Organ Soc 1985;10(1):328.
Boden R, Gummett P, Cox D, Barker K. Men in white coats men in grey suits: new public management and the
funding of science and technology services to the UK Government. Acc, Aud Accountability J 1998;11(3):267
91.
Booth P, Cocks N. Power and the study of the accounting profession. In: Cooper DJ, Hopper TM, editors. Critical
accounting. London: Macmillan; 1990. p. 391408.
Boyce G. Now and then: revolutions in higher learning. Crit Perspect Acc 2002;12(5/6):575601.
Byrne D. Social exclusion. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1999.
Chua WF. Teaching and learning only the language of numbersmonolingualism in a multilingual world. Critic
Perspect Acc 1996;7:12956.
Chua WF. Historical allegories: Let us have diversity. Critic Perspect Acc 1998;9(6):61728.
Chwastiak M. Star Wars at the bottom line: The Accounting Forum for Defense Contractors. Acc Organ Soc
1998;23(4):34360.
Clarke FL, Craig RJ, Amernic JH. Theatre and intolerance in financial accounting research. Critic Perspect Acc
1999;10(1):6888.
Clarke FL, Dean GW, Oliver KG. Corporate collapse: regulatory, accounting and ethical failure. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press; 1997.
Clikeman PM, Henning SL. The socialization of undergraduate accounting students. Issues Acc Educ
2000;15(1):117.
Collison D, Gray R, Owen D, Sinclair D, Stevenson L. Social and environmental accounting and student choice:
an exploratory research note. Acc Forum 2000;24(2):17086.
Cooper B. Who are the 21st century CPAs? Australian CPA 2002;72(2):368.
Cooper C. Ideology, hegemony and accounting discourse: a case study of the National Union of Journalists. Critic
Perspect Acc 1995;6:175209.
Cooper D, Tinker T. Accounting in a post-work era: editorial foreword. Critic Perspect Acc 1998;9(1):13.
Cory SN. Quality and quantity of accounting students and the stereotypical accountant: Is there a relationship? J
Acc Educ 1992;10:124.
Craig RJ, Clarke FL, Amemic JH. Scholarship in university business schools: Cardinal Newman, creeping corporatism and farewell to the disturber of the peace? Acc Aud Accountability J 1999;12(5):51024.
584
Davids C, Hancock L. Policing, accountability and citizenship in the market state. Australian New Zealand J
Criminol 1998;31(1):3868.
Davis SW, Sherman WR. The Accounting Education Change Commission: a critical perspective. Critic Perspect
Acc 1996;7(1):15989.
Deppe LA, Sonderegger EO, Stice JD, Clark DC, Streuling GF. Emerging competencies for the practice of
accountancy. J Acc Educ 1991;9:25790.
diFazio W. Poverty, the postmodern and the jobless future. Critic Perspect Acc 1998;9(1):5774.
Dillard JF, Tinker T. Commodifying business and accounting education: the implications of accreditation. Critic
Perspect Acc 1996;7(1/2):21525.
Dominelli L, Hoogvelt A. Globalisation, the privatisation of welfare, and the changing role of professional academics in Britain. Critic Perspect Acc 1996;7(1):191212.
Eagleton T. Ideology: an introduction. London: Verso; 1991
Esposito D, Aronowitz S, Chancer L, diFazio W, Yard M. The (in)spectre returns! Global capital and the future
of work. Critic Perspect Acc 1998;9(1):754.
Forgacs D. (Ed.) The Antonio Gramsci Reader: selected writings 19161935. London: Lawrence and Wishart;
1999.
Freire P. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. London: Penguin; 1996.
Freire P. Pedagoay of freedom: ethics, democracy, and civic courage. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield; 1998.
Friedlan JM. The effects of different teaching approaches on students perceptions of the skills needed for success
in accounting courses and by practicing accountants. Issues Acc Educ 1995;10(1):473.
Fukuyama F. The end of history and the last man. New York: The Free Press; 1992.
Fulmer WE, Cargile BR. Ethical perceptions of accounting students: does exposure to a code of professional ethics
help? Issues Acc Educ 1987;2(2):20719.
Geuss R. The idea of a critical theory: Habermas & the Frankfurt School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press;
1981.
Gibson K. Courses on environmental accounting. Acc Aud Accountability J 1997;10(4):58493.
Gow L, Kember D, Cooper B. The teaching context and approaches to study of accountancy students. Issues Acc
Educ 1994;9(1):11830.
Gramsci A. Selections from the prison notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart; 1971.
Graves OF, Nelson IT, Davis JR. Accounting student characteristics: a survey of accounting majors at Federation
Schools of Accountancy (FSA) schools. J Acc Educ 1992;10:2537.
Gray R, Collison D. Cant see the wood for the trees, cant see the trees for the numbers? Accounting education,
sustainability and the public interest. Critic Perspect Acc 2002;12(5/6):797836.
Guthrie J. A critique of the application of accrual accounting to the public sector. In: Clark C, Corbell D, St Leonards
NSW, Allen and Unwin, editors. Reforming the public sector: problems and solutions; 1999. p. 13548.
Habermas J. Legitimation crisis. Boston: Beacon Press; 1973.
Hall S. Gramsci and us. The hard road to renewal: Thatcherism and the crisis of the Left. London: Verso; 1988.
p. 16173.
Hall S. Gramscis relevance for the study of race and ethnicity. In: Morley D, Chen K-H, editors. Stuart Hall:
critical dialogues in cultural studies. London: Routledge; 1996. p. 41140.
Hall S, Jacques M. (Eds.) New times: the changing face of politics in the 1990s. London: Lawrence & Wishart;
1989.
Hines RD. Financial accounting: in communicating reality we construct reality. Acc Organ Soc 1988;13(3):25161.
Hoogvelt AMM, Tinker AM. The Sierra Leone Development Companya case study in imperialism. Critique
Anthropol 1977;2(8):669.
Humphrey C, Lewis L, Owen D. Still too distant voices? Conversations and reflections on the social relevance of
accounting education. Critic Perspect Acc 1996;7:7799.
Inman BC, Wenzier A, Wickert PD. Square pegs in round holes: Are accounting students well-suited to todays
accounting profession? Issues Acc Educ 1989;4(1):2947.
Johns A. Accreditation: the view from the society. Australian Acc 1996;66(9):21.
Klein N. No logo. London: Flamingo; 2001
Latham M. The network university. J Higher Educ Pol Manage 2001;23(1):717.
Lehman C, Tinker T. The real cultural significance of accounts. Acc Organ Soc 1987;12(5):50322.
585
Lehman CR. Accountings changing role in social conflict. Princeton and London: Markus Wiener and Paul
Chapman; 1995.
Lewis R. Commodified curricula: the coursebook. Australian Univ Rev 1998;41(2):34.
Macquarie Dictionary. Sydney: The Macquarie Library; 1991.
Marginson S. Rethinking academic work in the global era. J Higher Educ Pol Manage 2000;22(1):2335.
Marx K. Theses on Feuerbach. The German ideology. New York: International Publishers; 1970.
Marx K, Engels F. The German ideology. New York: International Publishers; 1970.
McLaren P. Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education. New York:
Longman; 1998.
McPhail K. The threat of ethical accountants: an application of Foucaults concept of ethics to accounting education
and some thoughts on ethically educating for the other. Critic Perspect Acc 1999;10(6):83366.
McPhail K. The dialectic of accounting education: from role identity to ego identity. Critic Perspect Acc
2001a;12(4):47199.
McPhail K. The Other objective of ethics education: re-humanising the accounting professiona study of ethics
education in law, engineering, medicine and accountancy. J Bus Ethics 2001;34(3/4):27298.
Merino BD. Critical theory and accounting history: challenges and opportunities. Critic Perspect Acc
1998;9(6):60316.
Miller P, Rose N. Governing economic life. Economy Society 1990;19(1):131.
Mitchell A, Sikka P, Willmott H. Policing knowledge by invoking the law: critical accounting and the politics of
dissemination. Critic Perspect Acc 2001;12(5):52755.
Murray G. Power/accounts and ideology. In: Cooper DJ, Hopper TM, editors. Critical accounts. London: Macmillan; 1990. p. 17389.
Needles BE, Powers M. A comparative study of models for accounting education. Issues Acc Educ 1990;5(2):250
67.
Neimark M, Tinker T. The social construction of management control systems. Acc Organ Soc 1986;11(4/5):369
95.
Neimark MK. The selling of ethics: the ethics of business meets the business ethics. Acc Aud Accountability J
1995;8(3):8196.
Neimark MK. Caught in the squeeze: an essay on higher education in accounting. Critic Perspect Acc 1996;7:111.
Nelson IT. Whats new about accounting education change? an historical perspective on the change movement.
Acc Horizons 1995;9(4):6275.
Newman JH. The idea of a university. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1996.
OConnor J. The fiscal crisis of the state. New York: St. Martins Press; 1973.
Parker LD. Back to the future: the broadening accounting trajectory. Brit Acc Rev 2001;33(4):42153.
Parker LD. Its been a pleasure doing business with you: a strategic analysis and critique of university change
management. Critic Perspect Acc 2002;12(5/6):60319.
Patten RJ, Williams DZ. Theres troubleright here in our accounting programs: the challenge to accounting
educators. Issues Acc Educ 1990;5(2):1759.
Preston N. Computing and teaching: a socially-critical view. J Comput Assist Learn 1992;8:4956.
Puxty A, Sikka P, Wilimott H. (Re)forming the circle: education, ethics and accountancy practices. Acc Educ
1994;3(1):7792.
Rappert B. Shifting notions of accountability in public- and private-sector research in the UK: some central
concerns. Sci Public Pol 1995;22(6):38390.
Reiter SA. Storytelling and ethics in financial economics. Critic Perspect Acc 1997;8(7):60532.
Reiter SA. Economic imperialism and the crisis in financial accounting research. Critic Perspect Acc
1998;9(2):14371.
Reiter SA, Williams PF. The structure and progressivity of accounting research: the crisis in the academy revisited.
Acc Organ Soc 2002;27(6):5707.
Richardson AJ. Accounting as a legitimating institution. Acc Organ Soc 1987;12(4):34155.
Robson K. On the arenas of accounting change: the process of translation. Acc Organ Soc 1991;16(5/6):247570.
Roslender R. Socio1ogical perspectives on modern accountancy. London: Routledge; 1992.
Saemaun GP, Crooker KJ. Student perceptions of the profession and its effect on decisions to major in accounting.
J Acc Educ 1999;17(1):122.
Saravanamuthu K, Tinker T. The university in the new corporate world. Critic Perspect Acc 2002;12(5/6):54554.
586
Sharma DS. Addressing the student quality problem: some directions for accounting education research. Asian
Rev Acc 1998;6(1):129.
Sikka P, Willmott H, Puxty T. The mountains are still there: accounting academics and the bearings of intellectuals.
Acc Aud Accountability J 1995;8(3):11340.
Tilling M. The dialectic of the university in times of revolution: echoes of the industrial revolution. Critic Perspect
Acc 2002;12(5/6):55574.
Tinker AM, Merino BD, Neimark MD. The normative origins of positive theories: ideology and accounting
thought. Acc Organ Soc 1982;7(2):167200.
Tinker T. Paper prophets: a social critique of accounting. New York: Praeger; 1985.
Tinker T. Metaphor or reification: are radical humanists really libertarian anarchists? J Manage Stud
1986;23(4):36384.
Tinker T. The accountant as partisan. Acc Organ Soc 1991;16(3):297310.
Tinker T, Feknous B. Developing the socio-political skills of accounting students: a mixed synchronous and
asynchronous learning strategy. Pacific Acc Rev 2001;13(1):1932.
Tinker T, Koutsoumadi A. A mind is a wonderful thing to waste: think like a commodity, become a CPA. Acc Aud
Accountability J 1997;10(3):45467.
Tinker T, Koutsoumadi A. The accounting workplace: a joyless future? Acc Forum 1998;21(3/4):289316.
Tinker T, Lehman C, Neimark M. Falling down the hole in the middle of the road: political quietism in corporate
social reporting. Acc Aud Accountability J 1991;4(2):2854.