Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
15
44
56
125
22
60
5 Sample
Size
90
0.91
0.0300
0.85
0.97
17
30
0.83
0.0680
0.7
0.96
12
0.75
0.1250
0.51
0.99
16
0.63
0.1210
0.39
0.87
0
0
1
2
2
3
3
15
4
31
5 Size
49
100
0.80
0.0400
0.72
0.87
19
37
37
100
0.74
0.0439
0.65
0.83
19
45
33
100
0.78
0.0414
0.7
0.86
19
42
35
100
0.77
0.0421
0.69
0.85
31
14
50
0.90
0.0424
0.82
0.98
2
Using ANOVA, we reject the null hypothesis that all ratings are the same; so at least one differs from the rest.
Count
Quality
Ease of Use
Price
Service
Sum
200
200
200
200
Average
879
833
734
828
4.395
4.165
3.67
4.14
55.505
621.65
3
796
18.50167
0.780967
677.155
799
Variance
0.581884
0.610829
1.136784
0.794372
ANOVA
Source of Variation
SS
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
df
MS
23.6907
P-value
F crit
1.1E-14 2.616089
3
The proportion of on time deliveries in 2008 was 0.9850.
We may test the null hypothesis that the proportion of on time deliveries in 2012 is < 0.985 to determine if it has improved (the alternate hypothesis is p > 0.985)
The sample proportion for 2012 is 0.9907
z = (0.9907 - 0.985)/SQRT(.985*(1-0.985)) =
0.046893
Critical value = 1.645
p-value =
0.48129912
Therefore, we cannot conclude a significant improvement
4 A chart of the average number of defects by year shows a declining trend.
1000
800
600
400
200
0
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
We may test for differences between 2008 and 2012 (assuming the samples are the monthly data since we don't know the actual number of shipments)
Mean
826.3333333
Variance
135.3333333
Observations
12
Hypothesized Mean Difference
0
df
12
t Stat
20.61894864
P(T<=t) one-tail
4.88441E-11
t Critical one-tail
1.782287556
P(T<=t) two-tail
9.76883E-11
t Critical two-tail
2.17881283
2012
496.25
2940.022727
12
The test clearly shows a significant difference in the mean defect rates.
5 Testing hypotheses that the mean cost has improved for one of the new processes, we cannot conclude a signficant improvement.
Mean
289.6
Variance
2061.144828
Observations
30
Hypothesized Mean Difference
0
df
52
t Stat
0.283404509
P(T<=t) one-tail
0.388996025
t Critical one-tail
1.674689154
P(T<=t) two-tail
0.77799205
t Critical two-tail
2.006646805
Process A
285.5
4217.637931
30
Mean
289.6
Variance
2061.144828
Observations
30
Hypothesized Mean Difference
0
df
41
t Stat
-0.968320801
P(T<=t) one-tail
0.169280943
t Critical one-tail
1.682878002
P(T<=t) two-tail
0.338561887
t Critical two-tail
2.01954097
Process B
298.4333333
435.3574713
30
6 Conduct two sample tests on mean years at PLE for each factor.
Mean
5.530769231
Variance
12.25064103
Observations
13
Hypothesized Mean Difference
0
df
18
t Stat
-0.009174759
P(T<=t) one-tail
0.496390313
t Critical one-tail
1.734063607
P(T<=t) two-tail
0.992780627
t Critical two-tail
2.10092204
Male
5.540740741
6.449430199
27
Mean
4.892307692
Variance
5.819102564
Observations
13
Hypothesized Mean Difference
0
df
29
t Stat
-1.078815194
P(T<=t) one-tail
0.144780886
t Critical one-tail
1.699127027
P(T<=t) two-tail
0.289561772
t Critical two-tail
2.045229642
College Grad Y
5.848148148
9.10951567
27
Mean
3.629411765
Variance
5.690955882
Observations
17
Hypothesized Mean Difference
0
df
34
t Stat
-4.418641425
P(T<=t) one-tail
4.80512E-05
t Critical one-tail
1.690924255
P(T<=t) two-tail
9.61023E-05
t Critical two-tail
2.032244509
Local Y
6.947826087
5.272608696
23