Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
DEFINITION
MBO is a systematic and organized approach that emphasizes the achievement of goals. In the
long run, this allows the management to change the organization's mindset to become more result
oriented.
The Management by Objective (MBO) approach, in the sense that it requires all managers to
set specific objectives to be achieved in the future and encourages them to
Continually ask what more can be done
www.financeandrelated.blogspot.com
Page 1
Essentially, MBO is a process or system designed for supervisory managers in which a manager
and his or her subordinate sit down and jointly set specific objectives to be accomplished within
a set time frame and for which the subordinate is then held directly responsible.
The MBO approach injects an element of dialogue into the process of passing plans and
objectives from one organizational level to another.
Although MBO is extremely result oriented, not all enterprises can benefit from MBO
implementations. The MBO is most suitable for knowledge-based enterprises where the staff is
quite competent of what they do.
Advantages
Page 2
Limitations
1. Time-consuming: Regular meetings are required in order to assess just how well the
system is working, all of which chew up even more time.
2. Reward-punishment approach: Since the process means constantly reaching goals,
employees that fall behind the timeline are subject to penalty, while those who do well
www.financeandrelated.blogspot.com
Page 3
are rewarded. This reward-punishment method can create a high level of stress on certain
members of the team.
3. Increases paper-work: Management by Objectives method involves lots of paper work
e.g. Training manuals, newsletter, and instruction booklets progress paperwork and
reports etc.
4. Creates organizational problems: Too many organizations fall into the trap of believing
that Management by Objectives is the cure for all that ails. They fail to see that there are
a definite set of problems that can come with it. One of the most common is that
employees will try to keep targets as simple as possible, whereas upper management will
shoot for the stars. This wide gap in expectations can make it difficult to find a common
ground in the middle. The program can also instill fear in employees as it is so closely
tied to performance.
5. Management by Objectives develops conflicting objectives: Each department will
have their own ideas of success, which they may feel is different from the rest, all of
which creates conflict.
6. Problem of co-ordination: Since each department has their own goal ideas, they may set
unrealistic goals in order to undermine others.
7. Management by Objectives lacks durability: When MBO is first introduced, it tends to
generate a lot of excitement. That can fizzle out over time as the method starts to become
tired. Its such a simple process, but also one that doesnt really leave space for new
opportunities.
www.financeandrelated.blogspot.com
Page 4
8. Problems related to goal setting: MBO works best when everyone is on the same page
and find the goals set to be mutually agreeable. That can all fall apart when the goals are
considered to be too rigid or when they are particularly difficult to set
Definition
A holistic approach to long-term success that views continuous improvement in all aspects of an
organization as a process and not as a short-term goal. It aims to radically transform the
organization through progressive changes in the attitudes, practices, structures, and systems.
Total quality management transcends the product quality approach, involves everyone in the
organization, and encompasses its every function: administration, communications, distribution,
manufacturing, marketing, planning, training, etc.
www.financeandrelated.blogspot.com
Page 5
Strategic and systematic approach. A critical part of the management of quality is the
strategic and systematic approach to achieving an organizations vision, mission, and
goals. This process, called strategic planning or strategic management, includes the
formulation of a strategic plan that integrates quality as a core component.
www.financeandrelated.blogspot.com
Page 6
The following are direct and indirect benefits that total quality management (TQM) can offer
organizations:
Higher productivity
Higher profitability
Pulling Away Manpower getting everyone in an organization up to speed on a new process like
TQM takes time away from actual production
Cost in Time and Money. Implementing TQM systems can take many years. Employees come
and go, with each of them requiring this training to stay up to speed with the rest of the
www.financeandrelated.blogspot.com
Page 7
organization's goals and members. Training takes time and involves significant investment by the
company in dollars and resources.
People Fear Change. Although some executives might have a clear understanding of TQM
theory and implementation, not every employee will. Global changes in training and processes
create fear, uncertainty and doubt within organizations
Reduction in Innovation. TQM's inherently systematic and process-oriented nature can serve as
a barrier. Development can occur slowly -- or not at all -- creating a deadly status-quo
environment that sometimes causes companies fixated on TQM systems to watch more flexible
companies surpass them.
Definition
Unstructured approach to hands-on, direct participation by the managers in the work-related
affairs of their subordinates, in contrast to rigid and distant management. In MBWA practice,
managers spend a significant amount of their time making informal visits to work area and
listening to the employees. The purpose of this exercise is to collect qualitative information,
listen to suggestions and complaints, and keep a finger on the pulse of the organization. Also
called management by wandering around.
www.financeandrelated.blogspot.com
Page 8
Pros
MBWA allows managers to see things as they really are and nearly always yields surprises. It is
a far more proactive management style, allowing the manager to spot things before they are
raised more formally and, as such, enables the manager to have a far better understanding of the
business.
Managers that are invisible are often felt to be distant and unapproachable and it can damage
team working if the manager doesn't get involved in day-to-day operations.
By walking around, managers may meet staff members that they otherwise very rarely see..
MBWA encourages managers to interact with all their staff and can be an ideal opportunity to
exchange ideas and feedback about developments in the business.
Cons
Some managers see MBWA as a means of 'cracking the whip'. If the manager appears and is
simply critical or domineering then this will alienate the employees even further.
www.financeandrelated.blogspot.com
Page 9
MBWA can encourage a negative, critical outlook of the business. While managers might enjoy
the opportunity to spot things that need fixing, this is not the only objective.
MBWA is not something that is done once or twice. It is a regular, ingrained part of the
management culture and must be something that is maintained over time. If a manager wanders
round very occasionally, it will engender the view that the manager is bored or has simply been
told to do it
Introduction
The balance scorecard is used as a strategic planning and a management technique. This is
widely used in many organizations, regardless of their scale, to align the organization's
performance to its vision and objectives.
The scorecard is also used as a tool, which improves the communication and feedback process
between the employees and management and to monitor performance of the organizational
objectives.
As the name depicts, the balanced scorecard concept was developed not only to evaluate the
financial performance of a business organization, but also to address customer concerns, business
process optimization, and enhancement of learning tools and mechanisms.
www.financeandrelated.blogspot.com
Page 10
Following is the simplest illustration of the concept of balanced scorecard. The four boxes
represent the main areas of consideration under balanced scorecard. All four main areas of
consideration are bound by the business organization's vision and strategy.
The balanced scorecard is divided into four main areas and a successful organization is one that
finds the right balance between these areas.
Each area (perspective) represents a different aspect of the business organization in order to
operate at optimal capacity.
Business Process Perspective - This consists of measures such as cost and quality
related to the business processes.
www.financeandrelated.blogspot.com
Page 11
The four perspectives are interrelated. Therefore, they do not function independently. In realworld situations, organizations need one or more perspectives combined together to achieve its
business objectives.
For example, Customer Perspective is needed to determine the Financial Perspective, which in
turn can be used to improve the Learning and Growth Perspective.
From the above diagram, you will see that there are four perspectives on a balanced scorecard.
Each of these four perspectives should be considered with respect to the following factors.
When it comes to defining and assessing the four perspectives, following factors are used:
Measures - Based on the objectives, measures will be put in place to gauge the progress
of achieving objectives.
Targets - This could be department based or overall as a company. There will be specific
targets that have been set to achieve the measures.
Initiatives - These could be classified as actions that are taken to meet the objectives.
www.financeandrelated.blogspot.com
Page 12
The objective of the balanced scorecard was to create a system, which could measure the
performance of an organization and to improve any back lags that occur.
The popularity of the balanced scorecard increased over time due to its logical process and
methods. Hence, it became a management strategy, which could be used across various functions
within an organization.
The balanced scorecard helped the management to understand its objectives and roles in the
bigger picture. It also helps management team to measure the performance in terms of quantity.
The balanced scorecard also plays a vital role when it comes to communication of strategic
objectives.
One of the main reasons for many organizations to be unsuccessful is that they fail to understand
and adhere to the objectives that have been set for the organization.
The balanced scorecard provides a solution for this by breaking down objectives and making it
easier for management and employees to understand.
Planning, setting targets and aligning strategy are two of the key areas where the balanced
scorecard can contribute. Targets are set out for each of the four perspectives in terms of longterm objectives.
However, these targets are mostly achievable even in the short run. Measures are taken in align
with achieving the targets.
www.financeandrelated.blogspot.com
Page 13
Strategic feedback and learning is the next area, where the balanced scorecard plays a role. In
strategic feedback and learning, the management gets up-to-date reviews regarding the success
of the plan and the performance of the strategy.
Following are some of the points that describe the need for implementing a balanced scorecard:
Improves the level of communication in relation to the organization's strategy and vision.
Helps to prioritize projects according to the timeframe and other priority factors.
Balanced Scorecard presents organizational goals in a single page chart broken down into
relatable areas.
Balanced Scorecard allows companies to bridge the gap between mission statement or
over-arching goals and how day to day activities support the company's mission or
objectives. A BSC goal of pleasing the customer can be tied to improving technical
support performance according to the Service Level Agreement or exceeding the SLA.
BSC raises innovation and process improvement methods such as six sigma and lean
manufacturing to a corporate goal. It also ensures that voice of the customer is equally
important.
www.financeandrelated.blogspot.com
Page 14
Balanced Scorecard does not exclude other methods of business reporting or process
improvement
Balanced Scorecards can provide a visual means of demonstrating how different goals are
related. Increased sales improve the profit or sales goals under the financial section.
Improved customer service meets the voice of the customer goal.
Balanced Scorecard does not include direct financial analysis of economic value or risk
management. Goal selection under Balanced Scorecard does not automatically include
opportunity cost calculations.
Because Balanced Scorecard can add a new type of reporting without necessarily
improving quality or financial numbers, it can seem to be an additional set of non-valueadded reporting or, worse, a distraction from achieving actual goals.
Overly abstract Balanced Scorecard goals are easy to reach but hard to quantify.
When a company is failing to meet its Balanced Scorecard goals, the goals may be reinterpreted to the current state of affairs to meet success or avoid failure. Altering the
acceptance criteria for a good balanced scorecard is easier than altering the acceptance
criteria for mechanical parts and hence the reject rate.
www.financeandrelated.blogspot.com
Page 15
Conclusion
As the name denotes, balanced scorecard creates a right balance between the components of
organization's objectives and vision.
It's a mechanism that helps the management to track down the performance of the organization
and can be used as a management strategy.
It provides an extensive overview of a company's objectives rather than limiting itself only to
financial values.
This creates a strong brand name amongst its existing and potential customers and a reputation
amongst the organization's workforce.
www.financeandrelated.blogspot.com
Page 16