Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
provide weapons used to attack Gaza, the Friends of the IDF, and Senators who voted to send
more weapons to Israel. Lobbying groups such as AIPAC and its younger, more liberal offshoot, J Street, are fast losing influence and members, while Jewish groups supporting
divestment are growingnotably Jews Say No, Partners for a Progressive Israel, Peace Now!, If
Not Now, When?, and Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP). We also witnessed the Presbyterian
Churchs landmark decision to divest its holdings in Caterpillar, Hewlett-Packard and Motorola
Solutions.
Will we stand on the right side of history? Or will we continue to invest in a regime that, as we
speak, is considering legislation in the Knesset outlawing Palestinian political parties in Israel
and imposing a 20-year prison sentence for stone throwing? Will we continue to allow the
university to profit from firms that back the illegal occupation and sanction the continued
building of settlements in clear violation of international law?
I know something about the value of divestment as a non-violent strategy for social justice.
Thirty years ago, as a graduate student, president of UCLAs African Activist Association, and
chair of the Los Angeles Ad Hoc Committee to Keep South Africa Out of the Olympics, I added
my voice to the movement calling on the University of California to divest its holdings from
apartheid South Africa. This was my generations Boycott, Sanctions, Divestment moment,
and many of us put our bodies on the line building makeshift shanty towns on campus and sitting
in at the South African Consulate in Beverly Hills. The movement was not popular at first, but
we educated our community, built momentum, and by the summer of 1986 succeeded in
persuading the U.C. Regents to divest its $3.1 billion worth of holdings from South Africa and
Namibia. Although it took nine years, and the University of California took longer to divest than
most major banks (including Citibank, Chase Manhattan, and Barclays), its leaders ultimately
decided to abide by the wishes of the students and faculty and take an ethical stance against
apartheid.
We understood then and nowthat apartheid did more than strip black South Africans of
voting and civil rights. The regime dispossessed Africans from their land, and through
legislative and military acts, razed entire communities and transferred Africans to government
townships and Bantustans. It was a system of racial classification and population control that
limited the movement of Africans in towns and cities, denied them social and economic
privileges based on race, outlawed organizations that challenged the apartheid state, and used
violence and detention to suppress opposition. Israel has been practicing a form of apartheid
since its inception. After destroying some 380 Palestinian villages, and ethnically cleansing
Palestinian towns and neighborhoods in mixed cities in 1948, confiscating land without
compensation, Israel passed The Absentees Property Law (1950), effectively transferring all
property owned or used by Palestinian refugees to the state, and then denied their right to return
or reclaim their losses. The land grab continued after the 1967 war and military occupation of
Gaza, the West Bank, and East Jerusalem. In violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention, Jewish
settlements in the Occupied Territories continue to expand exponentially since 1967.
Furthermore, the most recent violent racist attacks on African immigrants in Israel represent
some of the worst examples of human rights violations. Some 60,000 undocumented workers,
many having fled war-torn or economically devastated countries such as Sudan and Eritrea, are
denied refugee status, subject to deportation and imprisonment for up to a year without trial, and
endure horrifying violence from racist mobs.
The South African experience proves that peace and reconciliation is possible, but will remain
elusive without justice, nor will it be achieved as long as we continue to financially support a
regime that violates international law with impunity. The occupation is illegal, it perpetuates
more than a half century of dispossession, it does not serve the interests of the majority of Israeli
citizens, and it is costing American citizens some three billion dollars a year. The University of
California, a leading global light in public higher education, should not profit from occupation
and dispossession. Divest Now!