Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Page | 1
1. Executive Summary
Based on our review of the financial data form the annual report of the year 2011. Hereunder we will use
consolidated figures to calculate the following ratio for 2010 and 2011.
Nevertheless in the below report we will conduct evaluation of the performance and financial standing of the
company based on the ratios calculated.
The below figure 1 is summary of the last five year financial history of Westfarmers in which we will focus on
2010 and 2011
http://www.wesfarmers.com.au/ accessed online 19/10/2014
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
Revenue
62,348
59,832
58,080
54,875
51,827
EBITDA
5,273
4,729
4,544
4,155
3,786
(1,123)
(1,071)
(995)
(923)
(917)
EBIT
4,150
3,658
3,549
3,232
2,869
Finance costs
(363)
(432)
(505)
(526)
(654)
(1,098)
(965)
(918)
(784)
(650)
2,689
2,261
2,126
1,922
1,565
Page | 2
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
1,605
2,128
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
1,084
133
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
Total assets
39,727
43,155
42,312
40,814
39,236
Total liabilities
13,740
17,133
16,685
15,485
14,542
Net assets
25,987
26,022
25,627
25,329
24,694
3,401
5,259
4,904
4,343
4,035
3,226
3,931
3,641
2,917
3,327
(1,216)
(1,672)
(2,351)
(1,846)
(1,626)
952
(1,760)
(2,169)
(1,876)
(1,696)
(3,444)
(1,965)
(1,242)
(1,784)
(2,115)
4,178
2,171
1,472
1,041
1,631
Net debt
Page | 3
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
85
77
70
65
55
105
103
95
85
70
190
180
165
150
125
10
200
180
165
150
125
50
234.6
195.9
184.2
166.7
135.7
281.0
339.7
314.6
252.1
287.5
92
118
117
103
129
10.5
8.9
8.4
7.7
6.4
6.14
4.69
4.45
4.12
3.61
15.9
12.2
10.8
9.5
6.8
3.2
3.0
2.9
2.7
2.4
Page | 4
Table of Contents
Unit 101 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................................................. 1
The Wesfarmers Annual Report ANALYSIS ....................................................................................................................... 1
1.
Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................. 6
The company aims to achieve this by:.......................................................................................................................... 6
Our objective ................................................................................................................................................................ 6
Proud history, strong future ......................................................................................................................................... 6
Stock exchange listing................................................................................................................................................... 7
Wesfarmers Ltd. Business Description: ........................................................................................................................ 7
3.
Question 1 ................................................................................................................................................................ 7
Ratio analysis results for the years 2011 & 2010 ......................................................................................................... 7
4.
Question 2 .............................................................................................................................................................. 12
5.
6.
References .............................................................................................................................................................. 16
Table of Figures
Figure (1) Five year financial history ................................................................................................................. 2
Page | 5
2. Introduction
Wesfarmers is the largest conglomerate operating in Australia and New Zealand, with operations in
retail, insurance, and industrial products. Retail is the companys primary business and includes some of
Australias major outlets - Coles, Bunnings, Officeworks, Target and Kmart. Coles accounts for close to
50% of group sales and 42% of group operating earnings. As such, it is the major determinant in the
valuation of WES. The turnaround of Coles has been an operational success, however sales momentum
is easing with incremental gains harder to come by. Although the outlook for the Australian grocery
market is generally positive, underpinned by ~1.5% per annum population growth, a rapid industry-wide
(Aldi, Costco, Woolworths) roll-out of new stores may dilute returns. Wesfarmers has a strong position in
each of its segments and a track record of growing earnings and widening profit margins. However,
based on our intrinsic valuation, this record of success is more than accounted for in the current share
price.
Strength through diversity. From its origins in 1914 as a Western Australian farmers cooperative, Wesfarmers
has grown into one of Australias largest listed companies.
Headquartered in Western Australia, its diverse business operations cover: supermarkets; department stores;
home improvement and office supplies; coal mining; insurance; chemicals, energy and fertilisers; and industrial
and safety products. Wesfarmers is one of Australias largest employers and has a shareholder base of
approximately 500,000.
Our objective
Wesfarmers remains committed to providing a satisfactory return to shareholders.
Page | 6
3. Question 1
The below analysis is divided into two sections; the first section Financial results for the years 2011 & 2010 is
calculating the financial ratios shown below for the years 2011 & 2010:
1.11.21.31.4-
The second section of the analysis Financial analysis report for the year 2011 presents the analysis of the
financial ratio calculation results extracted from the first section of the report by comparing the results for the
year 2011 with their corresponding results for the previous year 2010; this comparison is analyzing the company's
financial performance.
= 1.23:1
= 1.17:1
b) Quick ratio
Formula =
= 0.6388:1
= 0.667:1
= 0.423$
= 0.3344$
= 28.32
= 28.02
= 12.88 days
= 13.026 days
f) Inventory turnover
Page | 8
Formula =
Inventory turnover for year 2010 =
= 10.70
= 10.97
= 34.11
= 33.27
= 3.01%
= 3.5%
Formula =
Interest cost as percentage of sales for year 2010
= 1.26%
= 0.95%
j) Asset turnover
Formula =
Asset turnover for year 2010 =
Page | 9
= 1.32
=1.37
k) Return on Assets
Formula =
Return on assets for year 2010 =
= 7.32%
= 8.07%
= 6.4%
= 7.7 %
= 0.588
= 0.611
= 0.396
= 0.379
o) Interest coverage
Formula =
Interest coverage for year 2010 =
= 4.38
= 6.14
= 20.25
= 19.1
r) Dividend yield
Formula =
Dividend yield for year 2010 =
= 4.55%
= 4.71%
s) Dividend Cover
Formula =
Dividend cover for year 2010 =
Page | 11
= 1.1849
= 0.228
= 0.188
= 1.239
= 3.6
= 4.1
4. Question 2
Evaluate the performance and financial standing of the company
based on the ratios calculated in
Question 1
Short-term solvency Analysis report
The current assets increased but the current liabilities increased as well, this increase in the current
liabilities has led to decrease in the current ratio, which is considered as bad indicator. The Current ratio
for the year 2010 was 1.23:1 and has become 1.17:1 for the year 2011 which means that the company was
having 1.23$ of current assets for every 1$ of current liability , and this value is decreased in 2011 to be
1.17$ of current assets for every 1$ of current liability
When applying the Quick ratio analysis by subtracting the Inventory from the current assets then dividing
the value by the current liabilities, the quick ratio for the year 2010 was 0.6388:1 and has increased to
become 0.667:1 for the year 2011 which is considered as good indicator. The increase in the quick ratio
while decrease in current ratio reflects that the increase in Inventory has affected the companys liquidity.
When performing Cash flow from operations to current liabilities for the years 2010 & 2011 , the
operating cash flow has decreased from 3,327(M)$ in the year 2010 to 2,917(M)$ , on the contrary the
current liabilities has increased from 7,852(M)$ for the year 2010 to 8,722(M)$ for the year 2011.
Accordingly the cash flow from operations to current liabilities ratio has decreased from 0.423$ for the
Page | 12
year 2010 to 0.3344$ for the year 2011 which is considered as bad indicator affecting the companys
liquidity
Inventory turnover has slightly increased from 7.381 in the year 2010 to 7.57 in the year 2011 although
the average inventory has increased from 4661.5 (M) $ for the years (2009 & 2010) to be 4822.5(M) $ for
the years (2010 & 2011), this is because the cost of goods sold has increased from 34,411 (M) $ in the
year 2010 to 36,515 (M) $ in the year 2011. The increase in the Inventory turnover ratio is considered as
good indicator.
Due to the increase in the Inventory turnover ratio, the inventory turnover in days which reflects the
number of days required to convert inventory into sales has decreased from 49.45 days in the year 2010 to
48.21 days for the year 2011 which is considered as good indicator.
Page | 13
Interest cost as a percentage of sales has decreased from 1.26% for the year 2010 to 0.95% for the year
2011 which is considered as good indicator.
The asset turnover ratio has slightly increased from 1.32 in the year 2010 to 1.37 in the year 2011
although the average assets has increased from 39,149(M) $ for the years 2009&2010 to 40,025 (M) $ for
the years 2010&2011, but the increase in sales from 51,827 (M) $ in the year 2010 to 54,875(M) $ in the
year 2011 has compensated the increase in average total assets. Although this ratio shows slight increase
from the years 2010 to 2011 which is considered as good indicator, the increase in assets has to be well
monitored and controlled
Return on assets ratio has increased from 7.32% for the year 2010 to 8.07% for the year 2011 , which
means that for every 1$ of assets the number of cents earned has increased from 7.32 cents to 8.07 cents
which is considered as good indicator.
The Return on ordinary shareholders equity has increased from 6.39% for the year 2010 to 7.68% for the
year 2011 which reflects that the profitability of shareholders equity is increased by 1.25% which is
considered as good indicator.
Debt to total assets ratio analysis shows that the proportion of total assets financed by debts has decreased
from 0.396 for the year 2010 to 0.379 for the year 2011.The decrease in debt to total assets is considered
as good indicator because it reflects that the business relies less on debts for buying assets
Interest coverage ratio analysis has increased from 4.38 for the year 2010 to 6.14 for the year 2011. The
ratio is above 1 for both years 2010 & 2011 which reflects that the company the income before interest
and tax of the business safe to pay off all interest expense. The increase in Interest coverage ratio from
4.38 for the year 2010 to 6.14 for the year 2011 which is considered as good indicator.
Page | 14
When performing Cash flow from operations to total liabilities for the years 2010 & 2011 , the operating
cash flow has decreased from 3,327(M)$ in the year 2010 to 2,917(M) $ on the contrary the total
liabilities has increased from 14,542(M) $ for the year 2010 to 15,485 (M) $ for the year 2011.
Accordingly the cash flow from operations to total liabilities ratio has decreased from 0.228 for the year
2010 to 0.188 for the year 2011 which is considered bad indicator affecting the companys long term
solvency
Price/Earnings ratio analysis shows that the ratio has decreased from 20.25$ for year 2010 to 19.1$ for the
year 2011.The decrease in the P/E ratio reflects that the market does not have much confidence in the
future of the shares of the company which is considered as bad indicator
Dividend yield ratio analysis shows that the ratio has increased from 4.55% for the year 2010 to 4.71% for
the year 2011 where the increase is considered as a good indicator because the investors use this ratio to
perform trend analysis of the company, having dividend yield ratio increasing year after year, investors b
confident to invest in the company.
Dividend cover ratio analysis shows that the ratio has increased from 1.1849 for the year 2010 to 1.239 for
the year 2011, which means that the ability of the company to pay ordinary dividends to shareholders out
of profit earned has increased from 1.18 to 1.23 times which is considered as good indicator.
Net tangible assets backing ratio has increased from 3.6$ for the year 2010 to 4.1$ for the year 2011, this
reflects that the value per ordinary share based on net tangible assets has increased from 3.6$ for the year
2010 to 4.1$ for the year 2011with increase of 0.51$, which is considered as good indicator.
http://www.wesresources.com.au/sites/default/files/publications/2010%20Wesfarmers%20Annual%20Report.pd
f
Page | 15
5. References
Wesfarmers Annual Report 2011 (with the support from Chiefly student)
Page | 16