To,

The Deputy Secretary, Department of Personnel and Training, Administrative Vigilance Division-1,
North Block, New Delhi.
Subject: Confirmation of complaint against Y.S. Malik, IAS: DOPAT/E/2014/02598.
Greetings,
I Naresh Kadian here by confirmed that I have lodged complaint against said tainted and biased IAS
officer and it is requested to please place him under suspension during inquiry.
Sincerely yours,

Naresh Kadian

Status as on 19 Nov 2014

Registration
Number
Name Of
Complainant
Date of
Receipt
Received by
Forwarded to
Officer name
Officer
Designation
Contact
Address

: DOPAT/E/2014/02598
: Naresh Kadian
: 20 Oct 2014
: Department of Personnel and Training
: ADMINISTRATIVE VIGILANCE DIVISON-I
: Ms. Anshu Sinha
: DEPUTY SECRETARY
: NORTH BLOCK
NEW DELHI
110001

Contact
Number

: 01123092158

Grievance
Description

Yudhvir Singh Malik, IAS enjoyed top positions of Department of Industries

: Haryana during Congress led Government and now his services were handed
over to the Center as CEO of FSSAI because they smell that Congress is not

going to repeat back in power, after 2014 Assembly election, where as he had
been in HSIDC and responsible for all wrong things, malpractice, corruption
and favoritism, hence top vigilance inquiry required of his tenure in HSIDC and
we demands white paper along with strict action against all offenders. For
example Media reports: Government auditor CAG has rapped the state-owned
HSIIDC for accepting the undervalued rate of land which was sold to real estate
giant DLF Ltd for setting up a recreational project in Gurgaon leading to a
financial loss of Rs 438.91 crore. In its latest report on Haryana's PSUs for the
year 2011-12, CAG while auditing Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure
Development Corporation Ltd (HSIIDC) observed that the valuation of the
property which was to be developed for recreation and leisure activities in
Gurgaon was wrong. ILFS Infrastructure Development Corporation, which was
appointed as consultant for assessment of land cost (in March 2008), valued the
land cost by using a mixed approach which means multiplying average market
rate of land with average District Collector (DC) rate. "The value of property
was worked out at Rs 1,683.58 crore (by consultant) whereas the valuation of
the property by considering average factors of 2.79 times for residential area and
3.105 times for commercial plots works out to Rs 2,142.11 crore," CAG said.
However, HSIIDC approved the reserve price at Rs 1,700 crore for bidding on
the basis of the consultant's valuation while the government accepted the DLF's
bid at Rs 1,703.20 crore. "The company (HSIIDC) by accepting the consultant
valuation without any analysis and study suffered a loss of Rs 438.91 crore,"
CAG noted. HSIIDC invited bids for sale of 350.715 acres of land in Gurgaon
in January 2009 for setting up recreational and leisure project. DLF Limited
submitted the bid at Rs 12,000 per square meter, though it sought clearance of
legal and procedural complexities. The bids were again advertised in July 2009
for the same project. Then Haryana's Town and Country Planning Department
decided that additional Floor Area Ratio (FAR) at the rate of 20 per cent of area
should be allowed to the successful bidder. In the second attempt, three bidders
including DLF, Country Heights Holding Berhad and Unitech showed interest
in the project. But HSIIDC rejected the bids of Country Heights Holding Berhad
and Unitech for not fulfilling minimum criteria. The project ultimately went to
DLF in February 2010. The HSIIDC management in the exit conference stated
that the bid parameters along with the benefit of extra 20 per cent FAR were
revised before the re-advertisement and expenses on getting clearance was the
liability of DLF, and no financial burden accrued to HSIIDC. "The reply was
not convincing as HSIIDC had fixed the reserve price of the land on the lower
side due to wrong costing of land," CAG said. CAG also recommended that
ILFC IDC should be debarred from entering into any business with HSIIDC.
Besides, the auditor has also found the transfer of 253 acres out of total land of
350.715 acres of land under the proposed project in violation of Punjab Land
Preservation Act (PLPA). It is pertinent to mention here that Punjab and
Haryana High Court terminate the allotment of land to the DLF recently and he
defended Govt. in press conference, hence he may kindly be placed under
suspension during investigation.
Current Status : INFORMATION SOUGHT FROM COMPLAINANT

Date of
Action
Details

: 05 Nov 2014
: Submitted in file NO.104/41/2014-AVD.I on 04.11.2014.