Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
DOI 10.1007/s13670-014-0078-5
Introduction
Epilepsy, or recurrent unprovoked seizures, is a chronic disease initially thought to be more prevalent in the young.
Epidemiological research over the past 40 years has revealed
a bimodal distribution in new cases of epilepsy, with old age
being the most common time to develop seizures [14, 5]. In
fact, the elderly account for 2530 % of all new cases of
C. M. Correll (*) : C. W. Bazil
Columbia Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Columbia University
College of Physicians and Surgeons, 710 W. 168th Street, New York,
NY 10032, USA
e-mail: cmc2235@columbia.edu
C. W. Bazil
e-mail: cwb11@columbia.edu
seizures [4, 6], and this statistic is likely to increase with our
aging population. Incidence cases of epilepsy in the elderly,
generally agreed upon as 65 years and above, have ranged
from 70 to 240 cases per 100,000 person years in various
studies [5, 7, 8]. These numbers are much higher than the
population as a whole (~ 50 cases of epilepsy per 100,000
person years). An early study by Tallis et al. [1] found increasing seizure incidence rates by decade above 60 years: 69 cases
per 100,000 person years in the general population, 76 cases
per 100,000 person years in the population above age 60, 147
cases per 100,000 person years in the population above age
70, and 159 cases per 100,000 person years in the population
above age 80. The elderly are not only at increased risk for
epilepsy, they are also at increased risk for status epilepticus,
with 830 % of the elderly with new onset seizures presenting
in status epilepticus [9, 10, 11, 12]. Moreover, rates of both
morbidity and mortality are higher in the elderly presenting
with seizures or status epilepticus compared to the general
epilepsy population [7, 13].
In addition to increased mortality, patients quality of life is
significantly affected by epilepsy, and this effect appears to be
magnified in the elderly. A study in the UK documented that a
groups of men with epilepsy over age 65 and women with
epilepsy over age 60 reported a worse quality of life compared
to younger patients with epilepsy. Quality of life was measured using a questionnaire containing an impact of epilepsy
scale, adverse drug events profile, hospital anxiety and depression scale, and stigma scale. [14]. Studies comparing
elderly with epilepsy to age-matched controls have found
significant differences in measures of psychosocial wellbeing, emotional adjustment, perception of stigma, depressive
and anxiety symptoms, memory and concentration tests, and
sleep, though these studies did not control for the etiology of
seizures, such as stroke, which can also impact quality of life
measures [15, 16]. These findings further highlight the need
for prompt and appropriate care of seizures in the elderly.
74
Diagnosis
Prior to starting treatment, it is important to determine if a
seizure disorder is in fact the correct diagnosis. Because the
gold standard of diagnosis, an abnormal electroencephalogram (EEG) during an epileptic seizure, is difficult to obtain,
a detailed and thorough history is the key to diagnosing
seizures. Patients often have incomplete or complete lack of
recollection of a seizure. Even when fully conscious of the
event, patients often have a difficult time describing symptoms without direct and informed questioning; this is heightened in the elderly who frequently live alone or in facilities,
and are at high risk for memory problems and dementia. When
in doubt, referral to a neurologist with training in epilepsy is
advised if there is a high suspicion for seizure [17].
Confusional or transient amnestic states, such as syncope/
arrhythmia, vertigo, metabolic disturbances (hypoglycemia,
nonketotic hyperglycemia, and medication toxicity), transient
global amnesia, complex migraines, and transient ischemic
attacks, are commonly mistaken for seizures in the elderly
[1820]. There are a number of classic complaints or symptoms that can lead to one of these differential diagnoses.
Syncopevasovagal, orthostatic, or due to an arrhythmia
is often proceeded by a prodrome of lightheadedness, darkening of vision, diaphoresis, and even nausea. While brief convulsive movements or myoclonic jerks following syncope are
fairly common, patients usually return to baseline mental
status quickly without the post-ictal confusion commonly
witnessed after seizures. Transient global amnesia is a profound confusional state with no alteration in consciousness.
The clinical presentation of this syndrome is characterized by
repetitive questions, such as where am I, due to a combination of retrograde and anterograde amnesia. Episodes typically
last for hours, which can help differentiate it from a complex
partial seizure typically lasting only a few minutes [19]. Focal
motor weakness can be seen post-ictally following a seizure,
in a phenomenon termed Todds paresis, but it should not be
the only symptom reported. Isolated motor weakness without
a preceding episode of impaired consciousness or clonic motor movements is much more suggestive of a transient ischemic attack than a complex partial seizure. A complex migraine
should be suspected if focal neurological symptoms are associated with a transient headache. Timing of the headache can
be helpful, because while headaches are common following a
convulsion, they are much more rare preceding or during a
seizure.
Sleep disorders are another category of neurological disorders commonly mistaken for seizures. Parasomnias are paroxysmal motor behaviors that occur without the patients
awareness during various stages of sleep [21]. Non-REM
sleep disorders are characterized as confusional arousals, somnambulism (sleep walking), or sleep terrors. Sleep terrors are
the most dramatic with associated agitated behavior and
Causes
The etiology of epilepsy in the elderly differs significantly
from the causes in younger patients, with the most common
being stroke and dementia. Tumors, infection, and trauma also
75
Management
When it has been decided that the presenting event was a
seizure, the next decision that must be made is whether the risk
of seizure recurrence is high enough to warrant chronic antiepileptic drug (AED) use. Population wide studies have generally shown seizure recurrence risk to be anywhere from 30
to 50 % after a first unprovoked seizure [44, 45]. Therefore,
patients are not generally treated after a first seizure unless an
abnormality that increases recurrence risk is found on workup
with a routine EEG or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of
the brain. Seizure recurrence rates greatly increase after a
second unprovoked seizure, and therefore, antiepileptic therapy should start after a second seizure even if the EEG and
MRI of the brain are normal. In the elderly population with a
first seizure, seizure recurrence rates of 3780 % have been
reported [8, 20, 26], with some authors using these numbers to
suggest starting treatment in all elderly patients with a first
time unprovoked seizure. This is not an agreed upon conclusion among all neurologists, and most will perform a complete
workup with EEG and MRI of the brain prior to making a
decision about treatment. Some also suggest that risk of serious injury with seizure recurrence is greater in the elderly
(broken bones, subdural hematoma), such that AEDs might
be recommended at a lower recurrence risk than in the young.
If there is a history of illness that increases the risk for epilepsy
such as stroke, dementia, tumor, or central nervous system
(CNS) infection, antiepileptic treatment should begin after the
first seizure. Similarly, treatment should be initiated if MRI
reveals a structural lesion such as stroke or tumor that increases the risk for epilepsy, or if there is epileptiform activity
on EEG. It is important to note that routine EEG may be less
helpful in diagnosis of epilepsy in the elderly compared to
younger populations. An early study reported that routine
EEGs in the general epilepsy population show interictal epileptiform activity ~50 % of the time on the first EEG and up to
8090 % of the time by the third and fourth repeated EEGs
[46]. Reviews of outpatient EEG referrals in the elderly have
mostly shown low rates of epileptiform abnormalities
[4749], but the rates increase dramatically when looking only
at patients with a definite diagnosis of epilepsy. Waton et al.
76
the increased tolerability, not efficacy, of LTG and GBP compared to CBZ. Brodie et al. [64] compared LTG to CBZ in the
elderly, age range 6594 years old, with newly diagnosed
epilepsy, defined as two or more seizures in the last year with
one in the past 6 months, and found higher seizure freedom
rates and lower adverse events with LTG use. On the contrary,
Saetre et al. [65] compared LTG to sustained-release CBZ, a
twice daily formulation compared to the three times daily
formulation used in the prior studies, and found no significant
difference in retention rates, seizure freedom rates, or adverse
events in an elderly group of patients age 6591 years old with
new onset epilepsy, defined as two or more seizures with one
in the past 6 months. These three studies did not adjust for or
analyze outcomes based on seizure etiology. Two of the three
studies did exclude patients with life expectancy less than
12 months or progressive neurological disease. Smaller single agent studies have shown acceptable efficacy and tolerability rates for many of the other newer antiepileptic
agents including OXC [66, 67], TPM [68, 69], and LEV
[7072]. An interesting multicenter randomized trial, comparing CBZ and LEV in late post-stroke seizures, found
increased adverse events and worse cognitive scores on
repeat neuropsychological testing in the group placed on
CBZ [73].
Antiepileptic Side Effects and Characteristics
Given the lack of sufficient head to head trials of antiepileptic
medications, the decision of which medication to start in the
elderly is largely dependent on side effect profiles (Table 1).
CBZ, while initially the gold standard for partial seizures in
the general population, has a number of side effects that likely
contributed to worse treatment withdrawal and adverse event
statistics in trials in the elderly. These include ataxia, rash,
hyponatremia, sexual dysfunction, and conduction block.
CBZ is an inducer of CYP450 hepatic metabolism and can
cause decreased serum levels of other AEDs, as well as other
commonly used medications in the elderly (i.e. warfarin,
simvastatin, and nimodipine). Because carbamazepine is also
metabolized through the CYP450 system, it is an autoinducer,
and other common enzyme-inducing drugs (i.e., cimetidine,
fluoxetine, erythromycin, isoniazid, diltiazem, verapamil, and
even grapefruit juice), can decrease the serum level of this
AED. Enzyme induction drug interactions are especially important in the elderly who are often on polypharmacy
regimens.
The older drugs PHT and PHB are also enzymeinducing agents with the same drug interaction problems.
Important side effects with PHT include ataxia, rash, gingival hyperplasia, sedation, conduction block, and irreversible cerebellar degeneration. Because PHT displays nonlinear kinetics, titration can be difficult, particularly in the
elderly. In addition to the enzyme inducing properties of
77
Table 1 Antiepileptic drug (AED) advantages, disadvantages, side effects, and medication interactions
Drug
Advantages
Disadvantages
Side effects
Medication interactions
Phenytoin
Ataxia
Somnolence
Rash
Osteoporosis
AEDs, warfarin,
Simvastatin,
cimetidine, Diltiazem,
propranolol, Isoniazid,
metronidazole
Phenobarbital
Inexpensive
Sedation
Osteoporosis
Rash
Hyponatremia
Arrhythmias
Impotence
Osteoporosis
Valproate
Somnolence
Tremor
Weight gain
Osteoporosis
Pancreatitis
Low platelets
Hyponatremia
Rash
Rash
Headache
Tremor
Insomia
Impaired cognition
Weight loss
Renal stones
Somnolence
Agitation/irritability
Somnolence
Weight loss
Agitation
Ataxia
Rash
Renal stones
Somnolence
Weight gain
Pedal edema
Somnolence
Weight gain
Sedation
Confusion
Somnolence
Ataxia
Conduction problems
AEDs, Warfarin,
Nimodipine
verapamil, Metronidazole
AEDs, cimetidine,
Fluoxetine,
Erythromycin,
verapamil,
Simvastatin, diltiazem,
Soniazid,
Metronidazole,
Doxycycline
AEDs
Oxcarbazepine
Lamotrigine
Topiramate
Levetiracetam
Zonisamide
Gabapentin
Tolerability
Pregabalin
Tolerability
Renal excretion
Clobazam
Lacosamide
Renal excretion
Protein bound
Renal excretion
AEDs
78
Treatment Algorithm
Figure legend: CBZ: carbamazepine; CLB: clobazam; GBP: gabapentin;LCM: lacosamide; LTG:
lamotrigine; LEV: levetiracetam; PGB: pregabalin; TPM: topiramate; VPA: valproate; ZNS: zonisamide
Nonadherence Issues
In determining a medication regimen, ability of the patient to
comply with the medication must also be taken into account.
Nonadherence to chronic medications is a common problem
in all age groups, but appears to be accentuated in the elderly.
A retrospective study of Medicaid claims for antiepileptic
medications found that noncompliance was more common
in patients aged 65 years or older [83]. Nonadherence rates
of 40 % and higher for AED use have been reported in the
elderly [84, 85]. Furthermore, nonadherence in this patient
population is associated with higher risk of mortality, increased hospitalization and ED visit, increased fractures and
other injuries, and higher healthcare costs [83, 84]. The elderly
are at increased risk for nonadherence for a multitude of
reasons including cognitive or memory impairments, the complexity of polypharmacy, and poor tolerance or side effects
[84]. Elderly patients are frequently on numerous medications
with complex dosing, which can be difficult to manage. In
fact, it has been shows that AED adherence decreases from
89 % for once daily dosing to 39 % for four times daily dosing
[86]. Additionally, the older patient often requires lower doses
of medications and can still have increased side effects at these
lower doses. Reasons for increased side effects and need for
lower doses in the elderly include decreased hepatic metabolism, impaired gastrointestinal absorption, decreased renal
clearance, decreased protein binding, altered drug distribution
due to changes in fat tissue, and decreased homeostasis at the
site of drug effect [17, 18, 8789]. The newer agents, such as
LTG and LEV, may be better tolerated and could lead to better
compliance [85]. Other suggestions to improve compliance
include supplementary education on the risks of seizures and
need for compliance, written medication instructions, simplifying polypharmacy regimens, and using extended release
formations to decrease peak dose side effects. Reminders such
as a pill box or smartphone alerts may also improve
adherence.
As in all age groups, the use of generic equivalents in
epilepsy should be met with additional caution due to the
greater potential for variability particularly with switching
between different generic manufacturers. For this reason, the
American Academy of Neurology recommends that changes
should not be made without the knowledge of the patient and
prescriber [90]. Blood levels may be necessary to ensure that
levels remain in the desired range when changes are made.
Medication Recommendations
Figure 1 shows an algorithm for choosing AEDs in the elderly.
It is important to remember that these choices are not based on
efficacy, as this is generally considered comparable, but by
drug interactions, adverse effect profiles, and other properties.
Lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and gabapentin are often
79
Conclusion
Seizures are found in a bimodal distribution, with one peak in
the very young, and with the most likely time to develop new
onset seizures being old age. As the number of elderly in our
population continues to grow, the healthcare system will be
faced with increased numbers of patients in this age group
presenting for management of seizures. The differential in this
age group is broad, and includes sleep disorder, syncope,
transient ischemic attack, transient global amnesia, metabolic
disturbances, and migraine. Compared to younger age groups,
seizures in the elderly are more likely to have an underlying
cause such as stroke and dementia, comorbidities that increase
the risk of mortality. While some data shows that the elderly
80
may be more likely to have recurrence following a first seizure, a full workup with an EEG and MRI of the brain should
still be obtained to better assess the need to start medications
and to search for structural lesions that could necessitate
further intervention.
When deciding on a treatment regimen for this age group, a
number of factors must be taken into account. Elderly are
more prone to side effects often requiring lower doses of
medications due to changes in hepatic metabolism, renal
clearance, and protein binding. Polypharmacy is common in
the elderly so drug-drug interactions and hepatic enzyme
induction or inhibition must also be considered. With regards
to these issues, the older antiepileptics such as phenytoin,
phenobarbital, carbamazepine and valproate can often be
problematic. Even newer medications such as oxcarbazepine
and topiramate can have worrisome side effects, such as
hyponatremia and cognitive slowing. Newer antiepileptic
medications that seem best tolerated in the elderly include
lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and gabapentin. While over twothirds of the elderly with epilepsy will respond to medications,
there will be treatment failures, and epilepsy surgery should be
considered in the healthy elderly as surgical outcomes appear
to be similar to their younger cohorts. Large randomized
control trials comparing newer medications such as levetiracetam, zonisamide, and lacosamide with the older antiepileptic
medications are lacking. Furthermore, there are no large controlled studies comparing specific medication treatment outcomes with seizure etiology (i.e., stroke, dementia, tumor).
Overall, as the elderly population grows, further research on
the medical and surgical management of epilepsy in this age
group is needed.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
Conflict of Interest Cynthia M. Correll declares that she has no conflict
of interest.
Carl W. Bazil has received financial research support from Lundbeck
and Eisai.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent This article does
not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any
of the authors.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
References
21.
22.
1.
23.
24.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
81
45.
82
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81. Ahmad BS, Hill KD, OBrien TJ, Gorelik A, Habib N, Wark JD.
Falls and fractures in patients chronically treated with antiepileptic
drugs. Neurology. 2012;79:14551. This large cross-sectional study
showed increased rates of osteoporosis and fractures in the elderly
on AEDs, which could not be accounted for solely by fractures due
to seizures.
82. Lazzari AA, Dussault PM, Thakore-James M, Gagnon D, Baker E,
Davis SA, et al. Prevention of bone loss and vertebral fractures in
patients with chronic epilepsyAntiepileptic drug and osteoporosis
prevention trial. Epilepsia. 2013;54:19972004. This double blind
randomized control trial of preventative bisphosphonate use in
patients on chronic AEDs showed improved BMD and decreased
fractures in the patient group treated with a bisphosphonate.
83. Faught E, Duh MS, Weiner JR, Geurin A, Cunnington MC.
Nonadherence to antiepileptic drugs and increased mortality: findings from the RANSOM study. Neurology. 2008;71:15728.
84. Ettinger AB, Baker GA. Best clinical and research practice in
epilepsy of older people: focus on antiepileptic drug adherence.
Epilepsy Behav. 2009;15:S603.
85. Zeber JE, Copeland LA, Pugh MJV. Variation in antiepileptic drug
adherence among older patients with new onset epilepsy. Ann
Pharmacol. 2010;44:1896904.
86. Cramer JA, Mattson RH, Prevey ML, Scheyer RD, Ouellette VL.
How often is medication taken as prescribed? A novel assessment
technique. JAMA. 1989;261:32737.
87. Turnheim K. When drug therapy gets old: pharmacokinetics and
pharmacodynamics in the elderly. Exp Gerontol. 2003;38:84353.
88. Leppik IE. Metabolism of antiepileptic medication: newborn to
elderly. Epilepsia. 1992;33(S4):S3240.
89. Landmark CJ, Baftiu A, Tysse I, Valso B, Larsson PG, Rytter E,
et al. Pharmacokinetic variability of four newer antiepileptic drugs,
lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, and topiramate: a comparison of the impact of age and comedication. Ther Drug Monit.
2012;34:4405.
90. Liow K, Barkley GL, Pollard JR, Harden CL, Bazil CW. Position
statement on the coverage of anticonvulsant drugs for the treatment
of epilepsy. Neurology. 2007;68:124950.
91. Kwan P, Brodie MJ. Early identification of refractory epilepsy. N
Eng J Med. 2000;342:3149.
92. Stephen LJ, Kelly K, Mohanraj R, Brodie MJ. Pharmacological
outcomes in older people with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Epilepsy
Behav. 2006;8:4347.
93. Besocke AG, Rosso B, Cristiano E, Valiensi SM, Garcia Mdel C,
Gonorazky SE, et al. Outcomes of newly-diagnosed epilepsy in
older patients. Epilepsy Behav. 2013;27:2935. This study highlights the fact that elderly with newly diagnosed epilepsy have good
response rates to medications.
94. Sirven JI, Malamut BL, OConnor MJ, Sperly MR. Temporal
lobectomy outcome in older versus younger adults. Neurology.
2000;54:216670.
95. Acosta I, Vale F, Atum WO, Benbadis SR. Epilepsy surgery after
age 60. Epilepsy Behav. 2008;12:324.
96. Grivas A, Schramm J, Kral T, von Lehe M, Helmstaedter C, Elger
CE, et al. Surgical treatment for refractory temporal lobe epilepsy in
the elderly: seizure outcome and neuropsychological sequels compared with a younger cohort. Epilepsia. 2006;47:136472.