Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Dept. of Electrical Engg. , Matoshri College of Engineering & Research Centre Nashik, India
1, 2, 4
krishna.madrewar21@gmail.com 2arankevivek@gmail.com
I.
INTRODUCTION
Distance relays have been successfully used for
many years as the most popular type of protection for
transmission lines. The development of electromechanical
and solid state relays with mho characteristics can be
considered as an important factor. Zone 1 of distance relays
is used to provide primary high speed protection, to a
significant portion of the transmission line. Zone 2 is used to
cover the rest of the protected line and provide some backup
for the remote end bus. Zone 3 is the backup protection for
all the lines connected to the remote end bus. The
implementation of distance relays requires understanding of
its operating principles, as well as the factors that affect the
performance of the device under different abnormal
conditions. Generally we may make the fault analysis and
the test by the simulation software, and according to the
actual system requirement, choose the suitable protective
relay, but for reliability and security considerations, the
massive simulations tests are usually undertaken. This is a
quite numerous and diverse job; therefore, having a superior
simulated environment is important [1]-[2].
Updating of a transmission system by constructing
new transmission lines becomes not easy because of
economic and environmental conditions. High efficiency in
terms of better utilization of existing transmission lines,
without compromising on the quality and reliability of
electrical power apply has thus to be found via alternative
means. And the alternative means are as -high power
semiconductor technology and Flexible AC Transmission
System (FACTS) technology has been developed to solve
this problem. However, because of the added complexity
due to the interaction of FACTS devices with the
transmission system, the transients superimposed on the
ZS1A
pZ1L
1-p Z1L
ZS1B
EA
V1A
AC
EA
EB
ZS2A
V2A
pZ1L
I1A
V1F
RF
ZS0A
pZ0L
V0A
I1F
pZ2L
I2A V2F
I0A V0F
I-pZ1L
ZS1B
V1B
I1B
EA
ZS2B
I-pZ2L
I2F
AC
V2B
I2B
I-pZ0L
I0F V0B
3Rf
ZS0B
I0B
Where, A =
&B=
Where, N =
,O=
,P=
Where, C =
E=
,F=
D =
Where, G =
I=
K=
,L=
,H=
,J=
M=
It can be seen that in this case the ensured
impedance at the relaying point is affected by STATCOM
parameters, even in the absence of the fault resistance.
C. STATCOM at the Remote End:
In this case STATCOM is installed at the remote
bus of the transmission line. Therefore, STATCOM is not
present in the fault loop. Here, the equations should be
modified as:
SIMULATION SCHEME
RELAY
140
120
100
Z2
Z3
80
AZ B
60
40
20
0
STATCOM
-20
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
R
20
40
60
80
100
120
100
100
80
80
60
60
40
40
20
20
-20
-100
-50
0
R
50
100
-80
-60
-40
-20
20
40
60
80
100
R
Fig.6. Impedance trajectory without STATCOM
Resistance-Reactance diagram for fault in zone 2 of the protected line Fault is created in zone 3 the characteristics shows in same
zone
150
100
100
80
X
50
60
40
20
0
-50
50
100
-20
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
R
20
40
60
80
120
100
80
X
FUTURE SCOPE
60
40
20
REFERENCES
0
[1]
-20
-80
-60
-40
-20
20
40
60
R
Fig.8. Impedance trajectory without STATCOM
80
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]