Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
www.theijst.com
1. Introduction
Earthquakes are a natural hazard which causes great ruin to structures. They occur due release of energy accumulated in the
earths crust overtime causing damage not only limited to buildings but also to the life they sustain. The unpredictable nature of
earthquakes has presented itself to be a mind boggler to civil engineers all around the globe and the target to build earthquake
resistant buildings still remains. Equivalent lateral force method is the most common procedure adopted, wherein the base shear is
computed as a whole and then distributed along the height of the structure. In case of a rigid frame, the total shear on any one
plane is distributed to the various elements on the plane with respect to their relative rigidity. It becomes an absolute necessity that
structures with limited height must at least cross the threshold of safety with reference to the static load method. The basic concept
of earthquake resistance design of reinforced concrete structures is to make strong column- weak beam construction to make sure
safety of user means during [1-3]. Analysis was carried out the existing slender RC brick with brick infill with openings for
windows and doors, for different zones like II, III, IV and V [4]. The evaluation of the storey stiffness of buildings with soft storey
was analysed using MIDAS GEN software [5].
74
Vol 2 Issue 8
August, 2014
www.theijst.com
Figure 3: Three dimensional rendered view of the building from Staad pro and Etabs
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Type of structure
Multi storey rigid jointed RC moment resisting frame
Seismic Zone
II,III,IV,V (Table 2, IS 1893 (Part I): 2002)
Number of stories
4, (G+3)
Floor Height
3.5m
Infill Wall
250 mm thick including plaster in longitudinal and transverse directions.
Imposed Load
5 kN/m2 as per [6]
Materials
Concrete (M25) and Reinforcement (Fe415)
Size of columns
0.45m * 0.45m
Size of beams
0.35m * 0.6m
Depth of slab
0.25m (including finishes)
Specific weight of RCC
25 kN/m3
Specific weight of Infill
20 kN/m3
Type of soil
Medium soil site
Table 1: Preliminary datas for the investigation
75
Vol 2 Issue 8
August, 2014
www.theijst.com
Any weight supported in between stories shall be distributed to the floors above and below in inverse proportion to its distance
from the floors.
2.4. Determination of Design Base Shear for Zone II
Design seismic base shear
Where, Qi = Design lateral forces at floor i, Wi = Seismic weights of the floor i, hi = Height of the floor i measured from base,
Base shear is distributed as follows,
Q1 = (1025.313*7388.0625*3.52 ) / (7388.0625*3.52)+( 7388.0625*72)+( 7388.0625*10.52)+
( 7388.0625*142) = 40.666KN.
Similarly the lateral force was calculated for the top three floors;
Q2 = 162.665 KN
Q3 = 365.998 KN
Q4 = 455.98 KN
76
Vol 2 Issue 8
August, 2014
Zone
1
2
3
4
II
III
IV
V
4000
3000
www.theijst.com
Results from
Etabs
1216.75
1946.80
2920.20
4380.30
MANUAL
STAAD
PRO
2000
1000
0
II
III
ZONES
IV
Figure 5
3. Results and discussion
In this study the seismic base shear was determined using Staad pro and Etabs software package and the values obtained from
Staad pro and Etabs were compared with manual results. It can be seen from Table 2 and Fig 5 that the base shear of zone II was
1025.30 kN in case of manual calculation and its has been increased to 5.45% and 18.67% in case of Staad pro and Etabs
respectively. Similarly for the zones III, IV and V the base shear was1640.49, 2460.74 and 3691.12 kN respectively in case of
manual calculation and it has been increased to 1.07% and 18.67% in case of Staad pro and Etabs respectively.
4. Conclusion
Comparative study of seismic base shear of the RC buildings in different seismic zones was carried out using Software package.
The following conclusions may be drawn from this study.
1. The base shear is high in Etabs when compared to Staad pro and manual calculation, whereas a less difference was observed
between the Staad pro and manual calculation and it is suggested that the Staad pro software package is more reliable than Etabs.
5. References
1. IS 1893(Part1):2002, Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, Part 1 General provisions and buildings,
Bureau of Indian Standard.
2. Pankaj Agarwal, Manish Shrikhande, Earthquake Resistant design of Structures (Prentice Hall India Publication).
3. Amadio, C.; Fragiacomo, M.; and Rajgelj, S. (2003). The effects of repeated earthquake ground motions on the nonlinear response of SDOF systems. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 32(2), 291-308.
4. Jayaramappa.N, and Santhosh.D, (2014) Case study on slender multi-storey RC building with brick infill IJRET:
International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, Volume: 03 Special Issue: 06 | May.
5. Hiten L. Kheni, Anuj K. Chandiwala (2014) Seismic Response of RC Building with Soft Stories International Journal
of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT) Volume 10 Number 12 - Apr.
6. IS 875 (Part 2): Code of Practice for Design Loads (Other Than Earthquake) For Buildings and Structures. Part 2:
Imposed Loads (Second Revision) (1987)
77
Vol 2 Issue 8
August, 2014