Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
On the next hearing when matter came up on board, civil petitions were not listed
because of wrong civil appeal no being mentioned in the previous order. The court
again ordered to tie up the matter as urgent.
Both of the matters when came up for hearing on 25th February 2014, at the outset
itself, Justice C K Prasad accepted the submission of Mr. C.U Singh, Senior Advocate
that both the matter are not connected to each other. Despite, there being no
connection, civil appeal no 9454-9455/2010 was taken up and in the absence of any
effective representation from City and Industrial Development Corporation of
Maharashtra (herein after referred as CIDCO) a statutory body, the civil appeal was
allowed without any debate. This was despite the fact that settlement was rejected
earlier by a different bench of the Supreme Court earlier vide order dated 25.04.2013.
This has lead to Mistry Construction to get the respective tender and 35 hectares of
prime land in Pune worth hundreds of crores which was rejected by the Honble
Bombay High Court.
The incident clearly raised eyebrows as a matter was tagged and listed without there
being no similarity and without any party counsel asking for the same. A matter was
disposed off without hearing a statutory body which was a party to the case. It has also
been reliably learnt that Mistry Construction is owned by Justice Prasads ex-juniors in
laws.
This incident shows that Justice C K Prasad is not a fit person to be appointed as a
chairman of PCI. He ought to be prosecuted for his act of criminal misconduct and
corruption, rather than being rewarded by being given an important position. The nonexistence of any transparent and objective procedure, at present, to appoint head of
various councils and commissions is leading to unfit and corrupt people heading
important offices. The practice of appointing any retired judge to office without proper
consultation and procedure leads to erosion of rule of law.
We kindly request you to cancel the appointment of Justice C K Prasad as PCI
chairman and set up an independent body which would exclusively deal with the
appointments of retired judges to important offices. It will also help restore the trust of
people in the credibility of various offices and the judiciary.
Yours Sincerely
Prashant Bhushan
Convener, CJAR