Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Figure
1:
Given
Layout
of
Assembled
Shaft
(Reproduced
from
MEMS1029
Project
#2
PDF
with
permission
from
the
ME
Dept.,
University
of
Pittsburgh)
Analysis:
The
first
part
of
the
analysis
will
look
at
the
loads
acting
on
the
beam.
In
Figure
2
below,
a
drawing
of
the
beam
is
shown
with
relevant
forces
shown.
Figure
2:
Drawing
of
Beam
with
Relevant
Forces
By
using
the
information
about
the
total
power
transmitted
through
the
shaft,
the
total
torque
on
the
shaft
can
be
determined
and
thus
the
forced
denoted
P
in
Figure
2
can
be
evaluated.
Equation
1
relates
the
power
(P)
transmitted
to
the
shaft,
to
the
applied
torque
(T)
and
angular
velocity
().
Equation
1a
calculates
the
torque
applied
to
the
shaft
using
the
given
information
from
the
Background
and
Requirements
section.
! = ! !
(1.)
!=
!
50 !"##$
50 !"##$
=
=
= .4 !"
!!
! !"#
!
1200 !"#
(1200 !"#)( )(
)
!"#
(1a.)
!" !"#
The
total
torque
depends
on
the
pulley
diameter.
We
will
assume
that
the
pulley
diameter
is
150mm.
The
torque
transmitted
to
the
pulley
is
given
by
equation
2
below
where
P
is
the
force
on
the
pulley.
! = .4 !" = ! .15! (.075 !)
(2.)
!=
(.4 !")(100)
= 6.3 !
(.075 !)(85)
(2a.)
From
Equation
2a
and
the
given
information,
the
forces
on
the
slack
and
tight
side
of
the
pulley
can
be
determined.
!!"#!! = ! = 6.3 !!!"#$% = .15! = .945 !
Assuming
that
the
coupling
weight,
bearing
weights,
sheave
weight,
and
all
applicable
fastener
weights
are
negligible,
a
FBD
of
the
shaft
can
be
created.
It
is
also
assumed
that
the
Pulley
forces
act
completely
horizontally
(-z
direction
as
denoted
by
Figure
2).
Figure
3
shows
the
FBD
of
the
shaft.
It
is
also
important
to
note
that
for
this
analysis
the
coupling
is
assumed
to
not
transmit
any
transverse
or
axial
forces.
This
assumption
eases
the
analysis
but
can
cause
the
analysis
to
lose
conservatism.
Figure
3:
Shaft
FBD
Appendix
A
shows
the
analysis
of
the
FBD,
and
applicable
shear
and
bending
moment
diagrams.
The
analysis
returned
these
results.
!!" = 0
!!" = 0
!!" = 2.415 !
!!" = 9.66 !
!!"# = 7.245 ! (!" !"#$%&' !)
This
information
allows
the
calculation
of
the
minimum
safe
shaft
diameter
under
static
loading.
Equation
3
shows
the
minimum
diameter
calculation
where
ns
is
the
factor
of
safety,
y
is
the
yield
strength
of
the
material,
M
is
the
maximum
bending
moment,
and
T
is
the
maximum
torque.
!
!!"#
32!!
3
=
!! + ! !
!!!
4
(3.)
By
choosing
a
factor
of
safety
of
4,
and
using
1018
CD
steel
for
the
shaft
material
(y=370
MPa);
the
minimum
diameter
can
be
calculated.
The
location
of
! ! ! = .3! = .0184
These
results
show
that
the
slopes
at
each
bearing
are
unacceptable.
However,
the
slope
at
bearing
b
is
greater
than
that
at
the
location
of
bearing
a.
To
determine
the
new
minimum
diameter
of
the
shaft
required
the
following
relation
in
Equation
5
will
be
used.
!!"#
!!"#
64 !!"#
=
!
! !!"# !"#
64 .0184
=
(1.925(10!!! )
! . 003
(5.)
= 7.003 !!
The
minimum
diameter
of
the
shaft
must
be
7.003mm
to
accommodate
the
maximum
allowable
slope
of
the
bearing.
However,
even
though
the
minimum
diameter
for
the
shaft
is
approximately
7mm.
Bearings
with
a
bore
diameter
of
7mm
are
not
readily
available.
What
also
needs
to
be
taken
into
consideration
is
how
the
components
will
be
mounted
to
the
shaft.
A
general
drawing
of
the
shaft
is
shown
in
Figure
4
below.
The
C10
load
ratings
for
the
bearings
are
calculated
from
Equation
6
below.
Where
FD
is
the
design
force,
LD
is
the
design
life
of
the
bearing,
and
LR
is
the
lifetime
rating
(millions
of
revolutions).
!!" = !!
!!
!!
(6.)
!!",! = 27.27 !
!!",! = 109.08 !
As
given
in
Table
11-2
of
Shigleys
(Ref
1),
the
C10
load
ratings
for
any
of
specified
bore
diameter
bearings
will
work
for
the
design.
It
is
known
that
the
motor
shaft
has
a
diameter
of
.4997
+
0.000/-.005
(approximately
12.7
mm).
We
will
design
the
left
end
of
our
shaft
where
the
coupling
is
placed
so
that
it
has
an
end
equal
to
the
diameter
of
the
motor
shaft.
Knowing
that
a
typical
D/d
ratio
at
a
shoulder
is
D/d
=
1.2,
we
can
calculate
the
other
diameters
of
the
shaft.
!! = 12.7 !!
!! = 1.2!! = 15.24 !!
!! = 1.2!! = 18.28 !!
Using
the
above
diameters
calculated,
and
information
on
what
bore
size
for
bearings
are
available.
We
can
further
refine
the
selected
diameters.
!! = 12.7 !!
!! = 17 !!
!! = 1.2!! = 21 !!
Figure
5:
Final
Diameter
Dimensions
of
shaft
Figure
5
above
shows
the
final
dimensions
of
the
diameters
of
the
shaft.
With
these
diameter
dimensions
determined,
we
will
now
check
to
see
if
the
17mm
diameter
at
bearing
B
is
acceptable
under
fatigue.
We
will
check
this
location
because
this
location
has
the
highest
bending
moment
and
the
addition
of
a
fillet
causes
a
stress
concentration.
The
calculation
of
stress
concentration
factors
is
shown
in
Appendix
A
and
produces
the
following
results.
!! = 1.7
!!" = 1.5
!! = 181.304 !"!
!! = .8987
!! = .917
!! = !! = !! = 1
For
a
rotating
shaft,
the
constant
bending
moment
will
create
a
completely
reversed
bending
stress.
Therefore,
we
can
define
the
midrange
bending
moment
(Mm),
the
alternating
bending
moment
(Ma),
midrange
torque
(Tm)
and
alternating
torque
(Ta)
as
follows.
!! = !!"# = .7245 !"
!! = ! = .4 !"
!! = !! = 0
The
minimum
diameter
required
at
location
B
can
then
be
calculated
using
Equation
7,
where
Sut=440
MPa
and
n
=4.
!!"#
16!
=
!
2(!! !! )
+
!!
!
(3(!!" !! )! ) !
!!"
= 6.87!!
(7.)
From
Equation
7
we
can
see
that
the
diameter
at
the
location
of
bearing
b
being
17mm
is
sufficient
so
that
fatigue
failure
will
not
occur
under
the
given
conditions.
Using
this
design
information,
the
following
bill
of
materials
was
created
and
is
included
in
Appendix
B.
From
the
available
components
and
sizes
the
final
dimensions
of
the
shaft
were
determined
and
are
shown
in
Figure
6.
Final
Design:
Discussion:
After
the
components
were
selected
and
the
shaft
diameters
chosen,
the
issue
with
mounting
the
components
to
the
shaft
is
of
importance.
With
the
fillets
in
the
shaft
at
the
locations
of
bearings
A
and
B,
this
will
prevent
the
shaft
from
moving
axially.
Since
the
bearings
are
mounted
in
pillow
blocks,
this
further
secures
the
bearings
because
the
pillow
blocks
will
be
fastened
to
a
surface.
From
the
pillow
blocks
selected,
we
can
also
see
that
a
setscrew
will
also
be
available
to
secure
the
bearings
in
place.
As
for
the
pulley,
a
key
and
keyway
will
be
used
to
secure
the
pulley
to
the
rotating
shaft.
The
dimensions
of
the
key
way
were
determined
from
Table
7-6
in
Shigleys
(Ref
1).
Throughout
this
analysis
many
assumptions
were
made
to
simplify
the
design
process.
However
it
is
important
to
note
that
many
of
these
assumptions
may
affect
the
results
from
this
analysis.
Two
assumptions
that
should
remain
as
open
items
for
continuation
of
this
design
are
the
assumptions
that
the
coupling
does
not
produce
any
transverse
or
axial
forces,
and
the
assumption
that
the
component
weights
are
negligible.
With
a
relatively
low
load
on
the
shaft,
the
weight
of
the
components
may
become
significant.
As
for
the
assumption
about
the
coupling,
this
has
been
the
area
where
many
shafts
fail
because
of
incorrect
analysis
of
the
coupling;
a
further
analysis
of
this
may
be
needed.
As
a
last
check
to
verify
the
design,
the
Solidworks
FEA
tool
was
used
to
analyze
the
stresses
at
the
location
of
bearing
B
an
image
of
the
FEA
is
shown
in
Figure
7
below.
Figure
7:
FEA
analysis
of
shaft
with
applied
force
Given
the
design
requirements
for
this
project,
and
the
analysis
completed,
the
final
shaft
design
meets
the
criteria
requested.
A
detailed
hand
analysis,
as
well
as
a
bill
of
materials
has
been
attached
as
appendices
for
reference.
References:
1.
Budynas,
Richard
G.,
and
J.
Keith
Nisbett.
Shigleys
Mechanical
Engineering
Design.
9th
ed.
New
York:
McGraw-Hill,
2011.
Print
Appendix
A
Hand
Calculations
and
Analysis
Appendix
B
Bill
of
Materials
Bill
of
Materials:
Part
Dimensions
Vendor/ #
Price
5.95
OD
.5
bore
McMaster
Carr
6204K32
$27.95
.5
x
.5
bore
1.5
total
length
Grainger
2AME6
$58.20
$34.90
$121.05
Ruland
Manufacturing
Coupling
Pillow
Block
Bearing
Mounted
Bearings
(2x)
Total: