Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1 JUNE 1997-II
Mohit Randeria
Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439
and Theoretical Physics Group, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay 400005, India
C. A. R. Sa de Melo
Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439
~Received 26 December 1995!
A functional integral formulation, used previously to calculate T c and describe normal state properties of the
BCS-Bose crossover, is extended to T,T c . The saddle point approximation is shown to be qualitatively
correct for T!T c for all couplings, in contrast to the situation above T c . Several features of the crossover are
described. The difference between the T50 pair size and the ~prefactor of the T dependent! GinzburgLandau coherence length is pointed out: the two quantities are the same only in the BCS limit. The evolution
of the collective modes from the BCS to the Bose regime is discussed together with the mixing of the
amplitude and phase in the absence of a particle-hole symmetry. @S0163-1829~97!07317-7#
55
c s ~ x ! Kc s ~ x ! 2g
c ~ x !
c ~ x ! c ~ x ! c ~ x ! .
H~ x !5
Here b is the inverse temperature, K52 2 /2m2 m , m is the
chemical potential, x5(x, t ), and \5k B 51. The cutoff associated with the attractive interaction g will be discussed
below. We follow the standard approach of introducing
D(x) which couples to
c
c , and integrating out the fermions.
The resulting effective action
S eff@ D # 5
E tE H
b
dx
u D~ x !u 2 1
2 Trlnb G21 @ D ~ x !#
g
b
~1!
~2!
de MELO
ENGELBRECHT, RANDERIA, AND SA
15 154
55
(k
1
tanh~ b E k /2 !
2
,
2ek
2E k
~3!
1
L3
(k
12
S DG
jk
bEk
tanh
.
Ek
2
~4!
55
15 155
(k @ f 2 f 8 #
u 2v 82
v 2u 82
2
iq n 1E2E 8 iq n 2E1E 8
(k @ 12 f 2 f 8 #
u 2u 82
v 2v 82
2
iq n 2E2E 8 iq n 1E1E 8
~5!
and
M 12~ q ! 5
(k @ 12 f 2 f 8 #
1
(k @ f 2 f 8 #
u v u 8v 8
u v u 8v 8
2
iq n 2E2E 8 iq n 1E1E 8
u v u 8v 8
u v u 8v 8
2
,
iq n 1E2E 8 iq n 2E1E 8
~6!
~ l *u * !
M E111M 12
iM O
11
2iM O
11
M E112M 12
DS D
l
~7!
Since M O
11(q,0)50, the amplitude and phase modes decouple at v 50. Further M E11(0,0)5M 12(0,0) ensures that
the phase mode for q50 is gapless, i.e., the Goldstone mode.
We now make a small q and v expansion
( v , u qu 2 /m!mink$ E k% ) of the effective action using
M E111M 125A1C u qu 2 2D v 2 1, M O
and
115B v 1,
M E112M 125Q u qu 2 2R v 2 1. We note that the amplitude
and phase are coupled via the linear time derivative term
iB v in Eq. ~7!. The coefficients A,B,C, etc., for arbitrary
couplings, are given by A5 ( kD 0 2 /2E 3 , B5 ( kj /4E 3 ,
C5 ( k$ (123X) j /m2 @ 1210X(12X) # Y % /8E 3 , D5 ( k(1
2X)/8E 3 , Q5 ( k$ j /m2(113X)Y % /8E 3 , and finally,
R5 ( k1/8E 3 , with the notation X[D 0 2 /E 2 and
Y [ u ku 2 cos2u/m2.
The collective mode dispersion obtained by solving
detM@ q, v (q) # 50 is v (q)5c u qu with the sound velocity
c 2 5Q/ @ B 2 /A1R # . The corresponding eigenvector of M is
(l, u )5(2ic u qu B/A,1), which is a pure phase mode for
q50, but for nonzero u qu has an admixture of the amplitude
controlled by B. For arbitrary coupling the integrals involved
in A,B, etc., have to be performed numerically; here we shall
only treat the analytically tractable limiting cases.
The weak coupling limit is particularly simple with all
integrals peaked near the Fermi surface and B50 due to
particle-hole symmetry ~the integrand is odd under
j k2 j k). With N( e F ) the density of states at e F for one
spin, we find Q54N( e F ) e F /3mD 0 2 and R52N( e F )/D 0 2 .
This leads to the well-known14 result c5 v F / A3 corresponding to the phase mode. To study the amplitude mode at
T50 we go back to the matrix M prior to making a small
v expansion. In weak coupling the amplitude is completely
decoupled from the phase mode since M O
11(q, v )50 by
particle-hole symmetry. Next, it can be shown that
M E11(0,2D 0 )1M 12(0,2D 0 )50. Thus the amplitude mode has
a gap 2D 0 at q50. Further, in the weak coupling limit,
Q/C5D/R53 and thus the stiffness for amplitude distortions is exactly one-third that for phase distortions.
As the attraction increases, the particle-hole symmetry of
the weak coupling limits is lost and the off-diagonal term in
Eq. ~7! proportional to i v (T c / e F ) increases accordingly.
This leads to a mixing of amplitude and phase for v ,q0.
In
the
strong
coupling
limit
A5 p D 0 2 K/
4u m u 3/2, B5 p K/8u m u 1/2, R5 p K/16u m u 3/2, and C5 p K/
32m u m u 1/2, where K5N( e F )/ Ae F . Here the dominant time
dependence arises from the linear time derivative in the offdiagonal matrix elements, in contrast to the weak coupling
de MELO
ENGELBRECHT, RANDERIA, AND SA
15 156
^ l q* l q & 5
^ u *q u q & 5
u qu 2 /2m B
,
B @ v B ~ q! 2 2 v 2 #
2m B c 2 1 u qu 2 /2m B
,
B @ v B ~ q! 2 2 v 2 #
^ l *q u q & 5
~8!
2i v
.
B @ v B ~ q! 2 2 v 2 #
55
10