Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Islamic Research Institute, International Islamic University, Islamabad is collaborating with JSTOR to
digitize, preserve and extend access to Islamic Studies.
http://www.jstor.org
IslamicStudies50:1(2011) pp.05-23
Abstract
It is well-established
in scholarship
thattheQur'n playsa vital rolein Ibn 'ArabVs
and
.
Ibn
is conscious
writings spiritualteachings 'Arabihimself
ofthecentrality
ofthe
. The hiddenanalogsbetweenthe Qur'n and Ibn 'ArabVs
Qur'n to his works
writingsexplaintheseemingly
abrupttransitions
fromone topicto anotherin the
Futht
or
the
chapters
of
non-chronological
presentation
of thewisdomassociated
withthevariousprophets
in theFuss.Although
thesestrongconnections
between
the
and
the
have
beennotedand demonstrated
Qur'an
Shaykh's
writings
bymany, and
some of the general hermeneutical
, a more in-depth
principlesdocumented
examinationof his concrete
methodremainsto be done. Thisshortessay
exegetical
carriesout thistask. It highlights
themainfeaturesofIbn 'ArabVshermeneutics,
his
ownprescriptions
the
method
and
how
it
or
was
not
enacted
,
was,
,
for
interpretive
and embodiedin hiswritings
.
Introduction
The Qur'an and Hadth play a vital role in Ibn 'Arabl's (d. 1240) writings.
Even an inattentive reader could not fail to notice abundance of scriptural
referencesin his writings.Ibn 'Arabi himselfis conscious of the centralityof
the Qur'n to his works as he says, "everythingof which we speak in our
meetings and in our writingscomes from the Qur'n and its treasures,"1and
that God gave him "the key to understandingit and taking aid from it."2
Scholars of Ibn 'Arab! agree that his writings,especially Al-Fuss al-Hikam
(fromhereon referredto as Fuss) which is a summaryof his teachings,and AlFutht al-Makkiyyah(from hereon referredto as Futht), his encyclopedic
magnumopus, can be seen effectivelyas Qur'nic commentaries:"The 'Meccan
1Ibn'Arabicitedin Michel
An Oceanwithout
: IbnArabi,theBook,andthe
Shore
Chodkiewicz,
Law(Albany:
StateUniversity
ofNewYorkPress,1993),20.
2Ibn 'Arabi,Al-Futhat
vol.m, 334.32citedin WilliamC. Chittick,
:
Ibn 'Arabi
al-Makkiyyah,
HeirtotheProphets
124.
Oneworld,
(Oxford:
2005),
SYEDRIZWAN
ZAMIR
TAFSR
AL-QUR'N
BI'LQUR'N
-j
SYEDRIZWAN
ZAMI
TAFSR
BI'LQUR'N
AL-QUR'N
context,the Shaykh notes that "the Qur'n is one book among others except
that, to the exclusion of all other books, it alone possesses allcomprehensiveness(jmi ;iyyah
)."12
For the Shaykh, the Qur'n is not only inclusive and all-comprehensive
but also exclusive as it stands for 'separation' and 'discrimination' (the literal
meaning of the term al-Furqn, another well-known name of the Islamic
scripture)fromothers.Here he has recourseto the Qur'n which employs this
termin describingitself:"... [He] hath revealed al-Furqn [3: 4]" and "Blessed is
He who sent down al-Furqn to His servant" [25: 1]. Usually translated as
"criterion" (of judging rightand wrong), the term Furqn gets Shaykh's close
attention. Studing the literal root of the term, he arrives at a different
understanding:"The two primarynames of the holy book, al-Qur'n and alFurqn togethermean that the Qur'n gatherseverythingtogetherand at the
same time separateseverythingout into clear and distinctdomains."13That the
Qur'n contains all that is there to know and that it is simultaneously the
doorway to this knowledge is a crucial point because it is this special status of
the Qur'n that guides all his hermeneutics.Ian Almond rightlyconcludes, "It
should be stressed that the Great Shaykh's hermeneutics almost entirely
concern the Qur'n. What Ibn 'Arab! says about meaning and interpretationis
seldom explicitly extended to other secular works, or to language in
general...the Shaykh will always find one Book to be more special than all the
other ones."14 All Muslims would agree with the Shaykh on this; yet, the
method by which he arrivesat this conclusion is uniquely his. His description
of the reality of the Qur'n is essentially derived from reflectionupon the
words the Qur'n chooses foritself.
Method of Interpretation
For Ibn 'Arabi, "[the Prophet] did not strayfromthe very form of that which
had been revealed to him, but rathertransmittedto us exactly what had been
told to him: for the meanings that descended upon his heart descended in the
formof a certaincombination of letters,of a certain arrangementsof words, of
a certain order of verses, a certain composition of srahs whose totality
comprises the Qur'n."15 Every word, in fact, every letter of the Qur'n
counts. This understanding of the Qur'n provides the bedrock for the
Shaykh's hermeneutics, whose first and most obvious feature is 'spiritual
12Ibid.
13Ibn'Arabi,Futuhat
... Vol.IE, 164.34.
14IanAlmond,
andDeconstruction:
A Comparative
Sufism
Study
ofDerridaandIbn 'Arabi(New
York:Routledge,
68.
2004),
15Ibn'Arabi,Futuhat
An Oceanwithout
23.
, vol.m, 158.Seealso,Chodkiewicz,
Shore,
SYEDRIZWAN
ZAMI
TA
FSiRAL-QUR'N
BIXQUR'N
outward sense to the inward sense, but they take the letter itself to the
meaning,without 'giving expression' to it."22
Literalism,as generallyunderstood,implies univocalism: thereis but only
one possible meaning of the text. Ibn 'Arabi, however, posits forcefullythat
the literal exactitude demanded by him concurrentlystirs up a plurality of
meanings that are embedded in the letter,while restrainingthe unwarranted
explanations that would violate it. That the Qur'n was revealed in Arabic is
in no way accidental: its vocabulary is abundantly rich and naturallyresultsin
multiple interpretations.Ibn 'Arabi does not simply state this principle, but
enacts it throughout his writings.I have already noted some examples in the
case of the words qur'n and furqan.
Another example is found in his interpretationof a famous Qur'nic
verse: "Naught is there anything like Him" (laysa ka mithlihshay'ur).The
preposition ka which means 'like' is generally considered redundant or
emphatic of likeness {mithlih), thus, the usual translation cited above.
Although not excluding this standard translation and interpretationof the
verse, Ibn 'Arabi often reads the ka as not simply redundant but as a
preposition that does in fact add meaning to the verse. In other words, in the
context of the verse ka could mean exactly what it conveys in translation:
simile or likeness. And because it could mean that, it does mean it. In the first
reading (where ka is redundant and emphatic) the verse translatesas "there is
nothing like Him [i.e., God]" while in the second reading, the verse will be
rendered as "There is nothing like His [i.e., God's] likeness." For his readers
then, the variant 'His likeness' permits Ibn 'Arabi to posit the idea of the
Universal or PerfectHuman (al-insnal-kmit)and his utteruniqueness due to
his likeness to Him. Consequently, the hermeneutical commitment to the
literal word (and the multiple possibilitiesinherentin it) allows Ibn 'Arabi to
retain both interpretationsand then employ either (or sometimes both) at
various occasions in the Fuss and Futht.21
Chodkiewicz cites numerous other examples to elaborate Ibn 'Arabi's
spiritualliteralism.In one passage he notes:
In the Qur'n, the divinecommandto Adam and Eve is not, strictlyspeaking,
thatof not eatingtheforbidden
fruit,but ratherthatof not approachingthetree
2:
Now
the
tree
(Qur'n 35).
(shajarah
) is, forIbn 'Arabi- a meaningdictatedby
and
more
the
etymology,
directlyby
meaningof theverbshajara,fromthesame
22Ibn'Arabi,
vol.DI,257.16.CitedinChittick,
TheSufiPathofKnowledge,
246.
Futuhat,
For a moreelaborate
discussion
of thisinterpretation,
see Chodkiewicz,
An Oceanwithout
37.AlsoseeIbnal-'Arabi,Ringstones,
41.Cf.note19above.
Shore,
12
SYEDRIZWAN
ZAMI
It is this
root, in anotherverse (4: 65) - the tashajjur(the act of dividing).24
division, this rupture of unity that Adam and Eve should eschew. The
metaphysicalsignificanceof theirdisobedienceis thus inscribedin the very
nature of the forbiddenobject and need not be sought elsewhere.25
This
is
coherent
with
the
continuation
of
the
interpretation perfectly
Qur'nic story
as givenin Surah Ta h (20: 121)...Theyate of it and thentheirnuditybecame
but thetermsaw'atuhumarefers
apparentto them.Nudityis theusualtranslation,
to the pudenda, Adam and Eve's sexual organs: in other words, sexual
the mostelementary
are the most evidentof the
differentiations,
manifestation,
division, of theruptureofunity.This is, forIbn 'Arabi,theunitysymbolizedby
thesphericalformthatoriginally
was thatofhumanbeing.26
BI'LQUR'N
TAFSR
AL-QUR'N
14
ZAMI
SYEDRIZWAN
TAFSR
BI'LQUR'N
AL-QUR'N
ZAMI
SYEDRIZWAN
the divine Word demands it. Submission to the Word of God implies that one
cannot subvert,bypass, or ignore its apparentmeaning.
One may cite two examples where in interpretingthe Qur'n, Ibn 'Arab!
invokes the principle of proper adab: first,in the Fass (ring-stone)of Noah, Ibn
'Arabi criticizesthose who deny tashblhin the followingwords:
as regardsthe
...in thesightof theFolk of theRealitiesto assertincomparability
Divine is to assert delimitationand qualification.The one who asserts
is eitherignorantor is a man of poor adab. When he uttersthis
incomparability
and speaks it, speakingthroughthe word of law as a believerand asserting
stoppingthereand seeingnothingotherthanthis,he displays
incomparability,
He is likethosewho
bad adab and givesthelie to theReal and to theMessengers...
in some.n
believein someand disbelieve
It is out of fidelityand respect toward the Qur'n - where tanzih and
tashbihare both affirmed- that Ibn 'Arabi rejects dogmatic absolutization of
Divine Transcendence (tanzih). It is only expected that claims of Divine
Immanence (tashbih)at the expense of Divine Transcendence will be equally
rejected by him.
A second example concerns Ibn 'Arabl's refusal to turn certain acts of
God mentioned in the Qur'n into a corresponding Divine Name. His
decision to refrain from attributinga Divine Name is again a function of
fidelityto the literal word of God, since in the Qur'n God Himself has
chosen not to name Himself in that manner. The limits put on what could or
could not be stated about God are set by God and His Word, and adhered to
throughconscious application of adab or etiquettetoward Him.
Since in religious parlance the attitude of fidelityto scripture is often
identifiedwith faith,in closing this section, it is importantto distinguishadab
from faith. Whereas faithusually implies strong belief and trustin the object
of faith,i.e., the scriptureor God, the attitude of adab as employed by Ibn
'Arabi is more akin to a concrete application of faithin the realms of reading
In other words, adab
the scripturesand decipheringthese faith-commitments.
is a consequence and application of faithand may be described as orientation,
right comportment, and proper attitude;it is faith concretized in day to day
43Ibnal-'Arabi,
to theQur'Inicverse4: 150:"Lo! Thosewho
37;italicscorrespond
Ringstones,
disbelieve
in AllahandHis messengers,
andseekto makedistinction
betweenAllahandHis
andsay:We believein someanddisbelieve
in others,
andseekto choosea wayin
messengers,
between."
Ibn 'Arabihastakenthemeaning
out ofcontext
in thiscase
Interestingly
enough,
whichis something
he frequently
does.Nonetheless,
hismethodofinterpretation
is trueto his
claimthatinthecaseoftheQur'n,every
wordcounts.
TAFSR
BU QUR'N
AL-QUR'N
yj
44For a detaileddiscussion
of Prophethood
and Sainthood(walayah
(nubuwwab)
) and the
between
SealoftheSaints
: Prophethood
and
them,pleaseseeMichelChodkiewicz,
relationship
Sainthood
in theDoctrineofIbn 'Arabi
IslamicTexts
, trans.LiadainSherrard
(Cambridge:
references
to varioussourceswhereIbn 'Arabi
Society,
1993).Chapter9 ofthebookprovides
discusses
hisroleasthe"Seal."
45Ibid.,130.
46Ibid.,139-40.
47Ibid.,140.
Jg
ZAMIR
SYEDRIZWAN
TAFSR
AL-QUR'N
BI'LQUR'AN
task for not employing both in his call to his community toward the God.
Based on this analysis,the prophet turnsout to be on the wrong side of things,
while the community appears justified in not paying heed to Noah's call.
Beyond teaching the lesson of simultaneous necessityof divine transcendence
and immanence in one's view of things,Ibn 'Arabl's unique interpretations
seem designed to jolt the reader in one way or the other. In the words of
Morris his writingsare spiritualinterpretationof the Islamic sources, Qur'an
and hadtb "...whose constantly shiftingfacets and multiple spiritual and
intellectual perspectives are and have long remained absolutely unique and
inimitable, designed to alternatively shake, surprise, confront, perplex,
trouble, intrigue, and fascinate even the most astute and well-prepared
readers."52The uniquely inimitablestyleand esoteric content leave an indelible
mark on the reader's soul, to which it inevitablyresponds.
It is no surprise then that reception of Ibn 'Arabl's writings has been
characterized by two extreme reactions: immense fascination and celebration
on the one hand, and extreme hostilityon the other. It is almost as though
apathy or indifferenceis not an option. Many Sufis would say that what one
takes away from his writings is a function of where one is in his spiritual
journey. For the ones who are overpowered by the habits of life and soul and
live a routine life, the psychological impact is meant to stir the process of
tahqiq (the process of realizing the deeper meanings of things,scripturaland
cosmological). For those, on the path, new meanings are revealed, to both
elevate the understandingand inspire more inquisitiveness.Not only are fresh
insightselicited, but many complex spiritual mattersare laid out for those at
the advanced stages. Historically, the Shaykh's writings were consistently
employed to defend the Sufi path and its doctrines against the most scathing
critiques. Morris has consistentlypointed out that it is these dimensions of his
writingsmore than anythingelse that make Ibn 'Arabi so influential.53
Concluding Remarks
From all that has been said so far,it would not be an exaggerationto state that
the hermeneutics of Ibn 'Arabi is essentiallythat of 'imitation.' In both his
styleand method of interpretations,and in his claims, he intendsto imitatethe
Qur'an. His writings are a way to gather from the Qur'an its hidden and
52Morris,
Orientations
, 41.
53
do notallowan in-depth
ofthepsychological
ofthevariousfacets
Spacelimitations
analysis
dimension
of his writings.
Pleasesee thevariouswritings
"Ibn
of JamesMorris,especially
'Arabl's'Esotericism':
The ProblemofSpiritual
StudiaIslamica
, 72 (1990):37-64;
Authority,"
and"Howto StudyFutuha.
Ibn'Arabi'sownAdvice,"
in S. Hirtenstein
andM. Tiernen(eds.),
Ibn
'Arabi:
A
Commemorative
Volume
Element
Books,1993),73-89.
Muhyiddin
(Rockport:
20
ZAMIR
SYEDRIZWAN
Bl'LQUR'N
TAFSR
AL-QUR'N
21
ZAMIR
SYEDRIZWAN
22
AL-QUR'N
BI'LQUR'N
TAFSIR
23