Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Conventional radiographs traditionally form the backbone in the diagnosis, treatment procedures and
follow-up of endodontic cases (Fig. 1ac).
One of the most important roles played by imaging in
clinical endodontics is the possibility of diagnosing and
describing lesions in the jaw bones that originate from
infection of the root canal (Fig. 2ac).
Most of the osteolytic lesions in the jaws are in fact
related to chronic apical periodontitis. The so-called
bony lesions of endodontic origin are a common
finding in dental radiology and are generated by the
pathologic changes occurring in the periradicular
tissues as a consequence of pulpal infection and
necrosis. Periradicular tissues surround and interact
with the root of the tooth. They originate from the
dental follicle, which surrounds the enamel organ, and
this unit consists of the cementum, of the periodontal
ligament (with its bundles of collagen fibres, extensive
network of vessels and nerves) and of the alveolar bone.
The interaction between the irritants exiting the root
canal to the periradicular tissues and the host defence
results in the activation of both non-specific inflammatory reactions and specific immune reactions.
As the disease proceeds, soft tissues produced by the
inflammatory reaction substitute the periapical bone.
Besides the possible clinical signs and symptoms
associated with the different stages of this condition
(such as swelling-sinus tracts- pain to percussion of the
52
CT
Hannsfield (11) devised the computerized axial tomography during the 1970s.
CT is an X-ray imaging technique that produces 3D
images of an object by using a series of two-dimensional
(2D) set of image data to mathematically reconstruct a
cross-section of it. This system measures the attenuation of X-rays entering the body from many different
angles. The computer then reconstructs the part under
observation in a series of cross sections or planes.
CT is unique in that it provides imaging of a
combination of soft tissues, bone and vessels, and the
technique has become a widely used method for the
diagnosis of pathologic conditions in the maxillary
bones and plays a major role when used following a
preliminary screening with a panoramic or a periapical
radiograph. Many studies have confirmed CT to be a
valid complement to conventional imaging methods
(12). Historically, before dental CT was introduced
to study the anatomy and pathology of the jaw
bones, conventional orthoradial tomography associated with a complex blurring device (Scanora,
Soredex, Helsinki, Finland) was applied to dental and
oral tissues.
Conventional orthoradial radiography is still in use
today, but it takes a longer time in order to allow
imaging of the complete jaw and it is less accurate and
more prone to errors (13). A study by Tammisalo et al.
(14) demonstrated that in the overall diagnosis of
periapical and periodontal lesions the Scanora system
and periapical radiographs performed equally well,
tomograms being more detailed only for detecting
periapical lesions in posterior regions. There are several
53
Dental CT
Dental CT was introduced in 1987 and it is defined as a
technique, which uses a specific protocol of investigation (15, 16). In dental CT, axial scans of the jaws are
acquired using the highest possible resolution, and
curved as well as orthoradial multiplanar reconstructions are obtained.
The coronal plane is not generally used for the scans
in dental CT, since the metal artefacts from teeth
fillings and other metal-dental work are frequent and
appear in these sections. Using the axial planes, the
occlusion plane will still have the artefact displayed, but
the bone will be left undistorted.
Dental CT can be performed with a conventional CT,
a spiral CT or a multislice CT scanner. The device
should give high-resolution scans with a small focal
spot and the acquired slices should be of 1.5 mm
thickness or less.
The slower the rotation of the tube, the more detailed
is the information gained. In order to achieve routine
images of the jaws, a spiral scan technique of 1 s per
rotation is valid; if small details need to be obtained for
diagnostic purposes, then 2 s per rotation need to be
used. The standard protocol for dental CT in the
diagnosis of pathologic conditions is as follows:
Incremental scan type; 1.5 mm slice thickness; 1.0
table feed; 120 mm field of view (for the mandible);
100 mm field of view (for the maxilla); 2 s scan time;
512 matrix; 12 kV; 25100 m A; high-resolution edge
enhanced filter, 20001400 HU (Hounsfields units)
bone window; mandible base and hard palate as scan
planes (17).
After the examination is completed, the axial slices are
transferred to a workstation to perform multiplanar
reconstructions; this is accomplished through dental
software.
The multiple orthoradial reconstructions are calculated perpendicular to a planning line that is manually
drawn along the centerline of the jaw arch. The distance
between each of the 4060 cuts is of 1.53.0 mm (Fig.
3). Panoramic reconstructions are calculated along the
3
54
55
Fig. 4. Dental computerized tomography examination of the maxilla in a case of extensive periapical lesion. (a) Axial
slices of the maxilla showing an extensive periapical lesion of endodontic origin. There is a significant amount of bone
destruction and the root of the tooth is visible in all the slices (arrows). (b) Lower axial slices of the same case. The roots
of the teeth of the maxilla are visible, with their periradicular bone (long arrows). In the upper slices the lingual cortical
plate shows signs of erosion and displacement (short arrows). (c) Panoramic and orthoradial reconstructions of the same
lesions showing the alveolar crest (black arrows) and the maxillary sinus (white arrows).
56
57
58
Fig. 6. Lesion of endodontic origin in the periapical areas of the upper left front teeth. (a) Periradicular lesion as seen in
the panoramic radiograph. (b) The same lesion as seen in the axial slice of the computerized tomography (CT). The major
diameters of the lesion and the erosion of the external cortical plate and the involvement of the incisal canal (arrow) are
shown. (c) Healing of the same lesion as seen in the panoramic radiograph 18 months after endodontic treatment.
Healing appears close to be completed. (d) CT axial slice of the lesion at the 18 months follow-up. The CT shows that the
external cortical plate has been repaired (arrow), but the lesion in the bone is still large.
59
Fig. 7. Endodontic lesion in the periapical area of the upper right canine. The tooth had a history of trauma, a short root
with open apex, and was refractory to apexification treatment with calcium hydroxide. (a) The upper right canine in the
periapical radiographs. The short root, the open apex and the periradicular lesion are seen. (b) One-year follow-up
periapical radiograph after apexification treatment was started; the lesion is unaffected and there is no evidence of apical
hard tissue barrier formation or periapical healing. (c) Computerized tomography examination of the lesion. The apex of
the tooth, the erosion of the external cortical plate and a small calcified particle (arrow) are shown. (d) After endodontic
surgery was performed, the calcified particle turned out to be a small root fragment. It was removed and the lesion was
curetted. The 1-year follow-up radiograph shows healing of the periapical tissues and formation of an apical barrier.
60
61
62
Alternative CT techniques
63
Fig. 12. Computerized tomography (CT) examination of a fibrous dysplasia of the mandible. (a) Panoramic image of
the mandible, demonstrating an extensive dysplastic area (long arrow); within this area a periapical lesion originating
from the lower left second molar is shown (short arrow). (b) Intraoral radiograph showing the same lesion in a restricted
view. (c) Axial CT section demonstrating the increased bucco-lingual width as well as the areas of radiopacity (short
arrow) and radiolucency (long arrow). (d) Three panoramic slices reconstructed along the planning line; they show the
different areas of radiolucency and sclerosis within the bone pattern (arrows).
64
65
66
67
68
69
Conclusions
The possibility to monitor biological changes in the
diseased bone in the field of periapical disease is always
challenging. From time to time it may be important to
be able to see a lesion in its real extension, to evaluate its
content, to assess its precise relationship to anatomic
landmarks such as the mandibular canal, mental foramen, incisal foramen, floor of the maxillary sinus, etc.,
and to speculate on its expansion, vascularization,
pattern of bone destruction, and evolution in time.
When it comes to the most common needs for
differential diagnosis of lesions of the jaws, the issue is
even more urgent. Many relatively new special imaging
techniques are available today that may reach these
goals. Some are well established, others are currently
being tested with promising results. It is necessary to
stress that most of the alternative imaging techniques
may be very expensive, or less safe for the patient
because of high radiation doses. Others may be
extremely sensitive but difficult to interpret. They
should therefore be used with the proper indication,
and performed by well-trained professionals.
Dental CT is now universally considered a useful
complement to conventional radiology techniques. In
endodontics, it may be useful for identification of large
lesions and their relationship to anatomic structures
70
References
1. Torabinejad M, Eby WC, Naidorf IJ. Inflammatory and
immunological aspects of the pathogenesis of human
periapical lesions. J Endod 1985: 11: 479488.
2. Nair PNR. Pathology of apical periodontitis. In: Orstavik
D, Pitt Ford TR, eds. Essential Endodontology. Prevention
and Treatment of Apical Periodontitis. Oxford: Blackwell
Science Ltd, 1998.
3. Stashenko P, Teles R, DSouza R. Periradicular inflammatory responses and their modulation. Crit Rev Oral
Biol Med 1998: 9: 498521.
4. Simon JH. Incidence of periapical cysts in relation to the
root canal. J Endod 1980: 6: 845848.
5. Nair PN. New perspectives on radicular cysts: do they
heal? Int Endod J 1998: 31: 155160.
6. Huumonen S, Orstavik D. Radiological aspects of apical
periodontitis. Endod Top 2002: 1: 325.
7. Bender IB, Seltzer S. Roentgenographic and direct
observation of experimental lesions in bone. J Am Dent
Assoc 1961: 87: 708716.
8. van der Stelt PF. Experimentally produced bone lesions.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1985: 59: 306312.
9. Marmary Y, Koter T, Heling I. The effect of periapical
rarefying osteitis on cortical and cancellous bone.
A study comparing conventional radiographs with
computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999:
28: 267271.
10. Goldman M, Pearson AH, Darzenta N. Endodontic
success whos reading the radiograph? Oral Surg Oral
Med Oral Pathol 1972: 33: 432437.
71
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
72