Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
The
propeller speed is 200 rpm, the boat speed is 20 knots, and the thrust reduction factor
(t) is 0.12, wake fraction (w) is 0.18, and the relative rotational efficiency R is 1.0.
The propeller operates as indicated by the Wageningen (Troost) Series B propeller
charts. Determine:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
Thrust
Shaft torque
EHP of the boat
The propeller shaft power (delivered power) PD
The (Quasi) PC or D
The propeller is also tested at zero ship speed (bollard pull) and it is found that the
engine limits the torque to 50,000 lbf ft. Determine:
f.
a. Prop. Thrust.
Given variables
d := 10ft
p := 10ft
p_over_d :=
t := .12
w := .18
R := 1
n_rpm := 200
n :=
n_rpm
60 sec
n = 3.333
Vs := 20knot
:= 1.9905lb
sec
ft
VA := Vs ( 1 w)
Velocity of Approach
Advance Ratio
m
VA = 8.437
s
VA
J1 :=
n d
1
s
J1 = 0.83
KT := .12
KQ := .023
2 4
Thrust := KT n d
Thrust = 2.654 10 lb
b. Shaft Torque
2 5
Torque := KQ n d
PD := 2 n
Torque
lb
550
Torque = 5.087 10 lb ft
ft
sec
hp
PD = 1.937 10 hp
d. EHP
Vs
PE := Thrust ( 1 t )
lb
550
ft
PE = 1.433 10 hp
sec
hp
e. Quasi Efficiency
D :=
PE
D = 0.74
PD
n o :=
Torque max
5
no = 3.305
KQ d R
2 4
Thrust q := KT n q d
1
s
n q := n o 60 sec
n q = 198.286
7 2
Thrust q = 9.391 10 s lb
V2 := 25 knot
EHP := 80000 hp
d 2 := 34 ft
w2 := .249
t2 := .18
R := 1
h := 25
First we must combine a couple of equations in order to get all the information we know in terms of KT and
J.
ft
lb
sec
R2 := 550
hp
EHP
V2
Kt
T2 :=
R2
1 t2
ft
lb
sec
550
hp
Kt :=
( EHP)
)(
V2 d 2 1 t2 1 w2
J2
T2
2
n2 d2
V2
J2 :=
n 2 d 2
= 0.55
Now we can plot the function KT = 0.55 * J2 on the B 5-90 curve graph. Drawing a verticle line
where the function plot and each KT - P/D intersect will provide a value for KT and o. Starting
with a logical P/D (.5 for example), step though P/D values, recording KT and o. Take note at
the peak value for o, That will determine optimal values.
found:
P/D = 1.2
KT=.29
o = .6
a. P/D = 1.2
J2 :=
b. KT(opt) = .29
Kt
Kq := .055
.55
c. KQ(opt) = .055
o2 := .6
2 5
d. o = .6
Kt := .29
Q2 := Kq n d
J2 = 0.726
e. J = 0.726
1t
PC := o2
1 w R
EHP
PD2 :=
PC
f. HP = 124200 HP
1 w2
n 2 := V2
J2 d 2
g. PC = .644
h. RPM = 77.012
n2 = 1.284
1
s
N2 := n 2 60 s
Cavitation Calculations
EAR := 90
A E := EAR
d2
4
assume AD ~ AE
P_over_D_ans := 1.2
PD2 = 1.242 10 hp
PC = 0.644
N2 = 77.012
h := 25ft
2
2
VR := V2 ( 1 w2) + ( 0.7 n d 2)
C :=
AP
1
2
VR
2026
0.7R :=
ft
sec
+ 64.4
ft
C = 5.421 10
1
A s
sec
sec
1
2 ft
VR + 4.836 N2 d 2
s
2
0.7R = 1.095 10
0.2
C :=
10
A E = 7.591 10 m
0.7R
0.0305
C = 17.791
0.0174
% cavitation
i. Cavitation = - 17.8%
Cn := C .0305 0.7R
A pn :=
0.2
0.2
.5 V 2
Cn R
EARn :=
A pn
( )
j. = EAR is much less than one, Changing to meet these requirements would
not be necessary. (This will be considered extra credit)
3. List the advantages and disadvantages of the fixed pitch propeller, controllable
pitch propeller, and waterjet propulsion systems. List the best applications (or
platform(s)) for each propulsor and supporting reasons considering the mission of the
platform. (expectation: half a page of concise thought).
For full credit - A brief discussion similar to that in chapter 6 of the text, At least 2 advantages and 2
disadvantages of each and an example of where each has been used sucessfully.