Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Thesis Coillinittee
Chairman
(Assoc. Prof. Ake Chaisawad, P11.D.)
Co-Chairman
(Veerapol Monyaltul, Ph.D.)
blemii.(
,
......................................
Y' w
....,l.1.:,.............................
Member
...........................................&..................................
Member
ii
Thesis Title
Thesis Credits
Candidate
Thesis Advisors
Program
Field of Study
Department
Faculty
B.E.
Abstract
In most of grid-connected photovoltaic power system, a DC-DC converter boosts PV
voltage to be the DC voltage that exceeds grid voltage at high switching frequency. An
inverter then shapes the current into the sinusoidal waveform at high switching
frequency and injects the current into the grid. Unlike this research, a two-switch
forward converter has many obligations. The converter boosts PV voltage to exceed
grid voltage and shapes the output current to be rectified sinusoidal waveform at high
switching frequency; it also isolates PV voltage from the grid. The four-MOSFET
bridge inverter is only used to unfold the rectified sinusoidal current to be the sinusoidal
current at the exact grid frequency (50 5 Hz). An ADMC331, a DSP made by Analog
Device Inc., and a number of HCPL788J optical isolated sensors are used as the brain of
the system. Four variables must be measured and sent to the DSP, these variables are
PV voltage (Vpv), PV current (Ipv), output current (Io) and grid voltage (Vgrid). By using
HCPL788J these variables are isolated and measured. At the beginning of the process,
ADMC331 generates a rectified sinusoidal waveform (Isine) from Vgrid. The processor
simultaneously tracks the maximum power point of the PV panels from Vpv and Ipv by
controlling the output current so that dP/dV = 0. At the maximum power point, the
processor calculates a maximum current and generate a reference current (Iref) by
scaling Isine with the maximum current. The processor then uses hysteresis controller in
order to shape Io to match Iref. As the result, the output current has exact the same phase
and frequency as the grid voltage; the amplitude of Io is varied to match the maximum
power in which the photovoltaic array can provide. The processor is also programmed
to stop all process whenever the grid power is fail and/or the frequency of Io is over
range (50 5 Hz). This power system was tested during noon until 4 P.M. of February
and March, 2003. The system was connected with 120-W photovoltaic array which was
installed in the opened space and was reached by sunlight. The performance of the
systems (converter, inverter, control scheme and total system) was calculated and was
set as the performance table.
Keywords: Grid-Connected / Photovoltaic / Double Forward Converter / Hysteresis /
Current Control / Digital Signal Processor
iii
..
12
..
.
2545
50 Hz ADMC331
HCPL788J PV (Vpv),
PV (Ipv), (Io) (Vgrid) ADMC331
ADMC331 (Isine)
(dP/dV = 0) Vpv Ipv
Io ADMC331 (Iref)
Isine Io
Isine ADMC331 Io
Io 50 5 Hz
.. 2546 120 W
(, ,
)
: / / /
/ /
iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This thesis is dedicated to my father and my mother who always dream that their
children would, at least, graduate the masters degree. Deeply thank to them for years
of support. The author wishes to express deepest gratitude to his advisors (Assoc. Prof.
Ake Chaisawad, Ph.D. and Dr. Veerapol Monyakul) for their continuing advice,
encouragement and dedication to this thesis. Both of them have instructed and given a
lot of significant advice to the author for years. Moreover, they also kindly provided
equipment and laboratory support. The author would like to show his appreciation to all
of the thesis committee, which includes Asst. Prof. Udomsak Yangyuen and Assoc.
Prof. Pitikhate Sooraksa, Ph.D. Not only being members of the committee, they also
provided several considerable suggestions and knowledge to the author. Moreover, the
author wishes to acknowledge Mr. Dumrong Amorndechapon, a lecturer of the Dept. of
Electrical Engineering. KMUTT; whose his technical supports the thesis are a great help
for the thesis to complete.
Thanks to friends (Keng, Sith, Murf and Nok) who always help the author challenge
many problems. Special appreciation must be demonstrated to Linzey Yeaung for the
best moral support. Without these people, the author would not have fulfilled the
masters degree.
CONTENTS
PAGE
ENLIGSH ABSTRACT
THAI ABSTRACT
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF FIGURES
LIST OF SYMBOLS
CHAPTER
1.
THESIS OVERVIEW
1.1
Thesis Overview
1.2
Literature Review
1.3
Thesis Objectives
1.4
Thesis Procedures
1.5
Thesis Concepts
ii
iii
iv
v
vii
viii
xi
1
1
1
6
6
6
2.
THEORIES
2.1
The Basic of Photovoltaics
2.2
Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT)
2.3
Forward Converter
2.4
Hysteresis Current Control
2.5
The Characteristics of ADMC331 Digital Signal Processor
8
8
10
12
19
20
3.
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
3.1
Hardware Development
3.1.1
System Overview
3.1.2
Photovoltaic Array
3.1.3
ADMC331 DSP Board
3.1.4
Rectified Sinusoidal Hysteresis Controller
3.1.5
Two-Switch Forward Converter
3.1.6
Single Phase Inverter
3.1.7
Gate Drivers
3.1.8
Sensors
3.1.9
Zero-Crossing Detector
3.2
Software Development
3.2.1
System Overview
3.2.2
Analog-To-Digital Converting Algorithm
3.2.3
Current Sink Algorithm
3.2.4
Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) Algorithm
3.2.5
Iref Generating Algorithm
3.2.6
Islanding Algorithm
25
25
25
26
27
30
31
33
35
37
41
42
42
42
43
44
46
46
vi
4.
48
48
48
48
48
59
59
59
59
60
5.
CONCLUSIONS
5.1
Conclusions
5.2
Future Improvements
5.2.1
Current Controller
5.2.2
Harmonics Elimination
64
64
66
66
67
REFERENCES
APPENDIX
A
B
C
69
CURRICULUM VITAE
71
71
74
79
83
vii
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
PAGE
60
61
62
62
63
viii
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.10
2.11
2.12
2.13
2.14
2.15
2.16
2.17
2.18
2.19
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
PAGE
2
3
4
4
5
5
6
7
8
9
9
10
10
11
11
12
13
13
14
16
17
20
21
22
23
23
24
25
27
28
29
30
30
31
31
ix
3.9
3.10
3.11
3.12
3.13
3.14
3.15
3.16
3.17
3.18
3.19
3.20
3.21
3.22
3.23
3.24
3.25
3.26
3.27
3.28
3. 29
3.30
3.31
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
4.10
4.11
4.12
33
34
34
35
35
36
36
37
37
38
39
39
40
41
41
42
45
46
47
49
43
44
44
45
49
50
50
51
52
52
53
54
54
55
55
4.13
4.14
4.15
4.16
4.17
4.18
5.1
5. 2
5.3
5.4
5.5
controller
Minimum duty cycle which was generated by hysteresis controller.
Positions of probes which were installed to determine fsmax and Dmax.
Maximum switching frequency which was generated by hysteresis
controller
Maximum duty cycle which is generated by hysteresis controller.
(a) Voc measurement, (b) Isc measurement, and (c) Pmax measurement.
Positions of probes which were used to investigate the system
efficiency
The conventional grid-connected PV system.
The grid-connected PV system designed in this thesis.
Basic current control scheme using SPWM.
Sinusoidal pulse-width modulation.
Harmonic trap filters; (a) the diagram (b) equivalent circuits.
56
57
57
58
60
61
64
65
66
67
68
xi
LIST OF SYMBOLS
iL
vc
vo
C
Ci
Co
D
Dmax
Dmin
fs
fsmax
fsmin
HB
iL(t)
iM(t)
K
N
Npri
Nsec
Ierr
Inorm
Imp
Io
Iph
Ipri
Ipv
Iref
Isc
Isec
L
LM
Lo
P
Pgrid
Pmax
Ppv
Rsense1
Rsense2
Rsense3
tck
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
T
TCRST
Tmax
Tmin
ton
toff
TPWM
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
xii
vc(t)
Vg
Vgrid
vL(t)
VIN+
VINVmp
Vo
Voc
Vpri
Vpv
Vsec
mppt
inv
sys
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
Photovoltaic arrays are fairy good approximation to a current source. However, most of
PV inverters are voltage-source inverters. Solar arrays in this thesis are also
implemented as a voltage source.
Figure 1.1(a) shows a single-phase full bridge bidirectional voltage-source inverter with
a voltage control and phase shift () control. The active power transfer from the PV
panels is accomplished by controlling phase angle between the inverter voltage and the
grid voltage. Therefore, the inverter voltage follows the grid voltage.
Figure 1.1b shows the VSI operated as a current-control inverter (CCI). The objective
of this control scheme is to control active and reactive components of the current fed
into the grid.
Design and construct a system that can convert the solar energy into the
electrical energy and transfer this energy to the distribution line.
Design and construct the inverter which can convert the direct current to the
alternating current by using a rectified sinusoidal hysteresis current control.
Tend to reduce the number of the high frequency switching elements as
many as possible.
Design a controller in which it can control the system to operate at the
maximum power the photovoltaic array can provide.
In this thesis, however, the DC-DC converter tracks the PVs maximum power point
and shapes the PV array voltage into the rectified sinusoidal current at high switching
frequency. Because the converter consists of a high frequency transformer, the
converter hence isolates the distribution line from the PV array and the rest of the
system. The single phase inverter is only used to unfold this rectified current to be a
50 Hz sinusoidal current, the switching frequency is also 50 Hz. Note that this thesis
reduces high switching components from five components (one is for the converter,
others are for the inverter) to two components for the converter.
Figure 1.8 Conceptual diagram of the grid-connected PV system for this thesis
CHAPTER 2 THEORIES
Several theories involving in this thesis are discussed in details in this chapter. Those
theories include:
A solar cell can be operated at any point along its characteristic current-voltage curve,
as shown in Figure 2.2. There are two important points on this curve; the open circuit
voltage (Voc) and the short circuit current (Isc). The Voc is the maximum voltage which a
solar cell can provide at zero current, whereas the Isc is the maximum current which a
solar cell can provide at zero voltage. For a silicon solar cell under a standard test
condition, Voc is typically 0.6-0.7 V, and Isc is typically 20-40 mA for every square
centimeter of the cell area. To a good approximation, Isc is proportional to the
illumination level, whereas Voc is proportional to the logarithm of the illumination level.
A plot of power (P) against voltage (V) for this device shows that there is a unique point
on the I-V curve in which the solar cell generates the maximum power at any
illumination level. This is known as the maximum power point (Vmp, Imp). Note that the
maximum power condition always occurs at the knee of the characteristic curve.
Therefore, every PV application should be able to operate at the maximum power point.
Figure 2.2 Current vs voltage (I-V) and current vs power (I-P) characteristics
for a solar cell
Because silicon solar cells typically produce only about 0.5 V per cell, a number of cells
needs to be connected in series (called PV module). A PV panel is a collection of PV
modules physically and electrically grouped together on a support structure. A PV array
is a collection of PV panels.
10
Figure 2.5 Typical I-V characteristic curves for different radiation levels
11
Figure 2.6 Typical power vs voltage characteristics for increased radiation levels
Referring to Figure 2.7, the load characteristics can be either curve OA or curve OB,
depending on the loads current and voltage requirement. If load curve OA is
considered and the load is only coupled to the solar array, the array will operate at point
A1, which will delivery only power P1. However, the maximum power available at the
given radiation is P2. In order to utilize the array at P2, a power conditioner coupled
between the PV array and the load is needed.
12
sampled at a proper sampling period and compared with the previous value. In the
event where the power is increasing, the solar array voltage is increased while the array
current is slightly decreased. On the contrary, if the power is decreasing, the array
voltage is decreased while the array current is slightly increased. The output power is
finally tracked around the maximum power point. Note that, the array current also can
be sampled and monitored as the system variable instead of monitoring the array
voltage.
The output power of the PV array can be expressed as
Ppv = Vpv * I pv
(2.1)
The conventional MPPT algorithm used dP/dV = 0 to obtain the maximum output
power point, hence the maximum output power of the PV array is also determined by
dPpv
dVpv
= I pv +
dI pv
dVpv
*Vpv
(2.2)
Therefore, the MPPT software algorithm can be developed by based on (2.2) [8].
Moreover, a PI controller or another AI controller can be merged with the conventional
MPPT. As the consequence, this hybrid MPPT algorithm will have faster settling time
compared with the conventional one.
13
the continuous conduction mode of the output inductor. According to Figure 2.10, three
switching intervals are then sketched in Figure 2.11.
Figure 2.9 Basic forward converter with its equivalent circuit model
14
15
Subinterval 3 begins when the magnetizing current reaches zero and hence diode D1
becomes reverse-biased. Components Q1, D1, and D2 operate in the off state and the
magnetizing current remains zero for the balance of the switching period.
By applying the principle of inductor volt-second balance to the transformer
magnetizing inductance, the primary winding voltage v1(t) must have zero average.
Referring to Figure 2.10, the average of v1(t) is
v1 = D (Vg ) + D ( Vg n1 / n2 ) + D3 (0) = 0
(2.3)
n2
D
n1
(2.4)
(2.5)
(2.6)
Therefore
D
1
n
1+ 2
n1
(2.7)
So the maximum duty cycle is limited. For the common choice n1 = n2, the limit
becomes
D
1
2
(2.8)
If this limit is violated, then the switch off-time is insufficient to reset the transformer
magnetizing current to zero before the end of the switching period. Transformer
saturation may occur.
The converter output voltage can be found by applying the inductor volt-second balance
to the output inductor L. The voltage across inductor L must have zero dc component,
and therefore the dc output voltage V is equal to the dc component of diode D3 voltage
vD3(t).
VD 3 = V =
n3
DVg
n1
(2.9)
It can be seen from (2.7) that the maximum duty cycle can be increased by decreasing
the turn ratio n2/n1. This will cause iM(t) to decrease more quickly during subinterval 2,
and hence resetting the transformer faster. Unfortunately, this also increases the stress
across the switch Q1. The maximum voltage across the switch during subinterval 2 may
be stated as
16
n
max ( vQ1 ) = Vg 1 + 1
n2
(2.10)
Note that, if n1 = n2 the voltage across the switch Q1 equals 2Vg. Therefore, decreasing
the transformer turn ratio n2/n1 allows increasing the maximum duty cycle, at the
expense of increasing the switch blocking voltage.
Figure 2.12 illustrates the two-switch version of the forward converter. The switch Q1
and Q2 are controlled by the same gate drive signal, they both conduct during
subinterval 1 and are switched off during subinterval 2 and 3. During subinterval 2, the
magnetizing current iM(t) forward-biases diodes D1 and D2. The primary winding is
then connected to Vg with the polarity opposite that of subinterval 1. The iM(t) then
decreases with slope -Vg LM. When iM(t) reaches zero, diode D1 and D2 is therefore
reverse-biased. The iM(t) then remains at zero for the balance of the switching period.
The secondary side of the converter is identical to the single-switch forward converter.
Diode D3 conducts during subinterval 1, while diode D4 conducts during subintervals 2
and 3. So the operation of the two-switch forward converter is similar to the singleswitch forward converter, in which n1 = n2. The duty cycle is also limited to D 0.5.
This converter has the advantage that the switch peak blocking voltage is limited to Vg
instead of 2* Vg. It also has the advantage that the transformer requires only two
windings.
17
vL (t ) = Vsec VO = L
I 2 I1
i
=L L
ton
ton
(2.11)
iL Vsec VO
=
ton
L
(2.12)
Thus, mode1 is characterized by inductor charging and the storage of electrical energy
in magnetic form in the inductor.
Mode 2 (ton < t toff)
Mode 2 equivalent circuit is illustrated as the secondary side equivalent circuit of twoswitch forward converter shown in Figure 2.11. Mode 2 begins when the switching
elements are both switched off. Since it is not possible to change the current flowing
through the inductor instantaneously, the voltage polarity across the inductor
immediately reverses in an attempt to maintain the same current which is flowing just
prior toff. Hence, the diode D2 is reverse-biased, while the diode D3 becomes forwardbias. The secondary side of the isolated transformer disconnects from the output
inductor L. The inductor current decreases as the electrical energy stored in the inductor
is transferred to the output capacitor C and load. From Figure 2.11, the voltage across L
is
VO = L
I1 I 2
toff
(2.13)
iL VO
=
toff
L
(2.14)
18
Figure 2.13 illustrates voltage and current waveforms of components on the secondary
side of the two-switch forward converter.
According to Figure 2.13, the current ripple iL is the same during mode 1 and mode 2
hence
iL =
(2.15)
n2
DVg
n1
(2.16)
The output voltage VO of the forward converter is the product of the duty cycle D, turn
ratio n2 / n1 , and the input voltage Vg. The duty cycle periodically changes in order to
maintain the desired output voltage during a load change and/or an input voltage
fluctuation. This periodic change of D is accomplished using a proper control scheme
such as, in this thesis, the rectified sinusoidal hysteresis current control. The ton and
toff are defined as
ton =
LiL
LiL
and toff =
Vsec VO
VO
(2.17)
LVsec iL
1
= ton + toff =
fs
VO (Vsec VO )
(2.18)
Therefore, for the steady-state operation, the current ripple in the output inductor L can
be expressed as
iL =
Vo (Vsec Vo )T
DVsec (1 D)
=
LVsec
Lf S
(2.19)
Thus, the current ripple in the output inductor is inversely proportional to the inductance
and switching frequency f S .
According to Figure 2.13, the average capacitor current is zero for a switching period
since the output capacitor is charged and discharged by the same amount during steadystate operation. However, the average capacitor current during T 2 t 3T 4 is
iC =
iL
4
(2.20)
19
v
v
vC (3T 4) vC (T 2) = VO + C VO C
2
2
= vC
=
1
C
(2.21)
3T / 4
iC dt
T /2
1
C
3T / 4
iC dt
(2.22)
T /2
1
C
3T / 4
T /2
iL
T iL
iL
dt =
=
4
8C
8Cf S
(2.23)
Finally, substituting iL from (2.19) into (2.23), the capacitor ripple voltage is
vC = vO =
(2.24)
Notice that, vc is also equal to the output ripple voltage vo since the output capacitor
is connected directly across the load. It can be seen that the vo is inversely
proportional to fs2 and LC product. Hence, to decrease the output ripple voltage, the
product LC should be large and the switching frequency should be high. Since the
output inductor L and output capacitor C form a low-pass filter, the choice of the value
of L and C determines the cutoff frequency of the output low-pass filter and ultimately
determines the amount of switching ripples and spikes in its output.
20
21
22
23
24
high, the counter value is latched into the appropriate 12-bit ADC registers. There is a
pair of four ADC registers (ADC1, ADC2, ADC3 and ADCAUX) corresponding to
each of the four comparators. Each pair is organized as master/slave. At the end, the
reference voltage ramp, which is prior to the next PWMSYNC, all four master registers
have been loaded with the new conversion count.
At the rising edge of the
PWMSYNC, the registered conversion count for each channel is loaded into the DSP
readable shadow registers, ADC1, ADC2, ADC3 and ADCAUX. The processor will
then read these shadow registers containing the previous conversion count, while
internally the master registers will be loaded with the current conversion count.
Because the operation of the ADC is intrinsically linked to the PWMSYNC interrupt
[6], the effective resolution of the ADC is a function of PWM switching frequency. For
a CLKOUT period of tck and a PWM period of TPWM, the maximum count of the ADC
is given by:
MaxCount = min ( 4095, (TPWM TCRST ) ) / 2tck at MODECTRL bit 7 = 0
(2.1)
(2.2)
2.5.3 Timers
A programmable interval timer is also included in the DSP core and can be used to
generate periodic interrupts. These periodic interrupts are generated; based on the
processors cycle time. The timer architecture is shown in Figure 2.19.
26
controller compares Io with Iref and shapes the output inductor current to match Iref at
high switching frequency. This rectified sinusoidal current is finally unfold and
transferred to the distribute line by a single phase inverter.
(3.1)
Second, the array current at Pmax is about 92.1% of the array short-circuit current, hence
I mp 0.921 ISC
(3.2)
Therefore, equations (3.1) and (3.2) can be applied to estimate Vmp and Imp of Voc and Isc
at the instantaneous array power. The change of array power depends on the solar
energy, as mentioned in Chapter1 and Chapter2, Isc always varies as the solar radiation
varies. Voc, on the other hand, slightly varies as the radiation doses but it significantly
decreases while the operating temperature rises.
27
28
29
30
(3.3)
Ri
*VDD , whereVDD = 12 V.
Ri + R f
(3.4)
31
converter. Otherwise, the controller commands the switching elements to remain their
prior statuses. Finally, a 2N7000, a general purpose MOSFET, converts the output
signal from the hysteresis controller to a TTL signal. This TLL signal is the gate drive
command for the two-switch forward converter.
32
(3.5)
Whereas, D is the duty cycle and Vpv is the PV array voltage. If N is defined as the turn
ratio of the isolated transformer, the voltage across the secondary side of the transformer
is therefore defined as
Vsec = N *Vpri
(3.6)
And because the two-switch forward transformer is based on the step-down converter
(buck converter), hence the output stage of the converter is given by
VO = D *Vsec
(3.7)
(3.8)
VO
N *Vpv
(3.9)
N =
VO
D *Vpv
(3.10)
In order to determine the turn ratio (N), letting Vo is the grid voltage, the duty cycle (D)
is 50% and the PV array voltage is the voltage at the maximum power point (Vmp) which
is 68.4 V. Therefore,
Turn ratio ( N ) = 6.5
(3.11)
With the desired turn ratio, the proper turn number (Npri and Nsec) of the transformer can
be determined as showing in Appendix B.
(3.12)
33
The output current ripple and the slope of the current trail can be determined, referred to
section 2.3. Whereas, Appendix C presents the algorithm which is used to determine
the turn number and the air gap of the inductor.
(3.13)
The output voltage ripple also can be determined in equations presented in section 2.3.
34
35
36
37
3.1.8 Sensors
Figure 3.17 illustrates the diagram of where sensors are positioned in the system. Two
voltage sensors are required in order to measure two voltage variables, which are the PV
array voltage and the grid voltage. Other two current sensors are applied to measure the
PV array current and the output current. The HCPL-788Js, optical isolated amplifiers,
are chosen to measure the PV array voltage, the PV array current, and the output
current. The grid voltage, however, is measured by using a 50-Hz voltage transformer.
38
Equation (3.14) shows that the output voltage of HCPL-788J is proportional to the
analog input. If a positive analog input is applied, the output voltage then becomes
greater than a half of the reference voltage. However, if the input is zero, the output is
equal to the reference voltage. Otherwise, the output voltage is less than the reference
voltage.
Vout =
(3.14)
The ABSVAL represents only the magnitude of the analog input signal and is
determined by
ABSVAL =
(3.15)
a. Vgrid Sensor
This sensor has an obligation of measuring the grid voltage. The 220-Vrms grid voltage
is attenuated to be a 9-Vrms voltage by using a 50-Hz voltage transformer. This
9-Vrms voltage is signal-conditioned by a difference amplifier, OP-07D, in order to
match the ADC specification of ADMC331. Finally the signal is inputted to ADCAUX,
the auxiliary ADC channel of ADMC331.
39
b. Vpv Sensor
Typically, the PV array provides the open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 84.4 V. This Voc must
be voltage-divided to be 252 mV and is inputted to the HCPL-788J, therefore a
2,994.7 resistor is chosen as Rsense2, referred to (3.16).
Vpv =
Rsense2
*84.4 V
1M+Rsense2
(3.16)
Rsense2 2,994.7
However, the PV array provides the voltage of 68.4 V at typical maximum power
rating; hence the input voltage of the sensor is approximate 204 mV, referred to (3.17) .
Vpv =
Rsense2
*68.4V = 204mV, where Rsense2 2,995 (3.17)
1M + Rsense2
According to Figure 3.20, the analog input signal is amplified to the full-scale voltage
of 3.16 V by HCPL-788J. An OPA4228, which is constructed as a difference amplifier,
levels up the ABSVAL signal so that it matches the ADMC331 specification. Finally,
the measured Vpv signal is inputted to ADC1, the first ADC channel of ADMC331.
40
a. Ipv Sensor
In general, the PV array provides 1.9 A of the short-circuit current (Isc). Therefore,
Rsense1 must be chosen so that the HCPL-788J input voltage reaches 252 mV at Isc.
Referred to (3.15), Rsense1 is given by
ABSVAL =
2*Vref * I pv * Rsense1
504 mV
= Vref
(3.18)
Rsense1 0.13
HCPL-788J amplifies the analog input and generates the ABSVAL, referred to (3.15)
and (3.18). Lastly, OPA4228 shifts the ABSVAL and inputs it to ADC2, the second
ADC channel of ADMC331.
b. Io Sensor
This sensor is designed to measure the output current of the forward converter, in fact it
measures the current which flows through the output inductor (Lo). The maximum
output current is carefully chosen to be 1 A. Therefore, Rsense3 is given by
2*Vref * I O * Rsense3 2*Vref *1A * Rsense3
=
504 mV
504 mV
= Vref
ABSVAL =
(3.19)
Rsense1 0.25
However, changing Rsense3 is also possible if the larger Io is required in the larger scale
system.
Similar to Ipv sensor, HCPL-788J amplifies the analog input and generates the
ABSVAL, referred to (3.15) and (3.19). Finally, OPA4228 raises the ABSVAL and
inputs it to the hysteresis controller.
41
42
Figure 3.24 Diagram shows control algorithms which are programmed into ADMC331
43
receiving the digital data from the first ADC channel and then stores the data in the
desired variable. The algorithm then checks whether all four analog inputs are received
or not. If not, execute the algorithm again. Otherwise, exit this algorithm and execute
other instructions.
(3.20)
(3.21)
Note that, the larger Vth is, the longer the switch death time will be.
After Vth1 and Vth2 are computed, the decision making algorithm will take place. This
algorithm compares the instance Vgrid with the Vth1 and Vth2. If Vgrid is greater than Vth1,
switches Q3 and Q6 are turned on while switches Q4 and Q5 are turned off. On the
contrary, If Vgrid is less than Vth2, switches Q3 and Q6 are off while the others are on.
Otherwise, all switches are turned off.
44
45
The MPPT algorithm, which is used in this thesis, is based on [8]. The algorithm must
monitor the change of the PV array power (Ppv) correlated to the change of the array
voltage (Vpv), as expressed in (3.22) and (3.23).
Ppv = Vpv * I pv
(3.22)
= I pv +
dI pv
dVpv
*Vpv
(3.23)
where dIpv and dVpv are the changes of PV array voltage and current, respectively.
From (3.23), the dPpv dVpv can be replaced with I pv + (dI pv dVpv ) *V , making the
calculation practical for the ADMC331 16-bit DSP.
46
decreasing the reference voltage (or increasing the reference current) forces dPpv dVpv
to approach zero. When dPpv dVpv > 0 , increasing the reference voltage (or increasing
the reference current) forces dPpv dVpv to approach zero. When dPpv dVpv = 0 , the
reference value does not need any change. The software diagram of MPPT algorithm is
also illustrated in Figure 3.29. In Figure 3.29, Vpv and Ipv are the instant PV voltage and
current, whereas Vprior and Iprior are the previous PV array voltage and current,
respectively.
(3.24)
DSP sends this digital Iref to TLV5618A, the 12-bit digital-to-analog converter, via the
serial communication port. Finally, Iref is converted back to an analog Iref signal by
DAC.
47
T2 starts latching T2 Flag to logic 1 at the moment the Timer T1 has reset T1
Flag. The T2 Flag is latched for 4 ms, after that it will be reset.
At the proper condition, where the grid frequency is 50 5 Hz, the zero-crossing signal
occurs while T1 Flag is logic 0 and T2 Flag is logic 1. As the result, the
islanding algorithm allows the program to resume its last execution. When the over
frequency condition occurs, the islanding algorithm detects that the zero-crossing signal
occurs while T1 Flag is logic 1 and T2 Flag is logic 0; these yield the islanding
algorithm to force the program to halt, reinitiate parameters and wait for the proper
condition. When the under frequency condition occurs, the algorithm detects that the
zero-crossing signal is risen while T1 Flag and T2 Flag is logic 0; these yields the
algorithm to reset, reinitiate the program and wait for the proper condition. Note that
zero-grid voltage condition also generates the 0-Hz zero-crossing signal in which the
islanding algorithm can be detected as the under frequency condition.
4.1.2 Instruments
The instruments used in this experiment are as follow
- DC Power supplies
: Model GPR3030 manufactured by Good Will
Instrument Co., Ltd.
: Model APS-1 manufactured by ANA-DIGIT
Group Co., Ltd.
- Digital multimeter
: METRA Hit 29S (digital power meter, digital
true RMS multimeter) manufactured by
Gossen-Metrawatt GMBH, Germany.
- Digital oscilloscope
: THD210 digital real-timer oscilloscope,
60MHz bandwidth and 1GS/s sampling rate,
manufactured by Tektronix INC, U.S.A.
- Current probe
: Model A6306 manufactured by Tektronix INC.
- Current probe amplifier : Model TM502A manufactured by Tektronix
INC, U.S.A..
- Voltage-different probe : 1 kVdc or 700 Vac rms input voltage.
Attenuation ratio is either 1:20 or 1:200.
4.1.3 Procedures
-
49
Figure 4.1 Positions of probes which were installed to investigate Vpri and Ipri of the
isolated transformer
Figure 4.2 Voltage and current of the primary side of the isolated transformer
Figure 4.2 illustrates voltage and current of the primary side of the transformer.
Whereas:
- CH1 = Voltage across the primary side of the isolated transformer.
- CH2 = Current flows through the primary side of the isolated transformer.
- Voltage-different probe was set to 1:20 attenuation ratio, hence
50
(4.1)
(4.2)
Figure 4.3 Positions of probes installed to investigate Vsec and Isec of the transformer
Figure 4.4 Voltage and current of the secondary side of the isolated transformer
51
Figure 4.4 shows voltage and current of the secondary side of the transformer.
Whereas:
- CH1 = Voltage across the secondary side of the isolated transformer.
- CH2 = Current flows through the secondary side of the isolated transformer.
- Voltage-different probe was set to 1:200 attenuation ratio, hence
Vsec = 200* Scope _ read _ out (V/Div)
-
(4.3)
(4.4)
52
(4.5)
(4.6)
Figure 4.7 Positions of probes installed to measure VO and IO of the output inductor
53
Figure 4.8 Output voltage and output current of the two-switch forward converter
Figure 4.8 shows voltage and current of the secondary side of the transformer.
Whereas:
- CH1 = Output voltage of the two-switch forward converter.
- CH2 = Output current of the two-switch forward converter.
- Voltage-different probe was set to 1:200 attenuation ratio, hence
VO = 200* Scope _ read _ out (V/Div)
-
(4.7)
(4.8)
54
Figure 4.9 Positions of probes which were connected to measure the voltage and
current of the distribution line
Figure 4.10 shows voltage and current of the distribution line.
Whereas:
- CH1 = Voltage of the distribution line.
- CH2 = Current flows through the distribution line.
- Voltage-different probe was set to 1:200 attenuation ratio, hence
Vgrid = 200* Scope _ read _ out (V/Div)
-
(4.9)
(4.10)
55
Figure 4.11 Positions of probes which were installed to determine fsmin and Dmin
56
(4.11)
(4.12)
In Figure 4.12, the fsmin can be measured by using the cursor of the digital oscilloscope.
f smin = 7.353kHz
(4.13)
1
fsmin
= 136 s
(4.14)
Again, Figure 4.13 shows the measuring of the turn-on time (ton), hence
ton = 26 s
(4.15)
ton
= 0.2
Tmin
(4.16)
Figure 4.13 Minimum duty cycle which was generated by hysteresis controller
57
Figure 4.14 Positions of probes which were installed to determine fsmax and Dmax
58
(4.17)
(4.18)
(4.19)
1
fsmax
= 106s
(4.20)
Again, Figure 4.13 shows the measuring of the turn-on time (ton), which is
ton = 36s
(4.21)
ton
= 0.34
Tmin
(4.22)
59
4.2.2 Instruments
The instruments used in this experiment are as follow
- Digital multimeter
: METRA Hit 29S (digital power meter, digital
true RMS multimeter) manufactured by
Gossen-Metrawatt GMBH, Germany.
- Digital oscilloscope
: THD210 digital real-timer oscilloscope,
60MHz bandwidth and 1GS/s sampling rate,
manufactured by Tektronix INC.
- Current probe
: Model A6306 manufactured by Tektronix INC.
- Current probe amplifier : Model TM502A manufactured by Tektronix
INC.
- Voltage-different probe : 1 kVdc or 700 Vac rms input voltage.
Attenuation ratio is either 1:20 or 1:200.
4.2.3 Procedures
-
60
Figure 4.17 (a) Voc measurement, (b) Isc measurement, and (c) Pmax measurement
The measurement of Voc, Isc, Vmp, Imp, and Pmax are summarized in Table 4.1 and Table
4.2.
Table 4.1 Measured Voc and Isc on March 2, 2003
Characteristics of PV array
Time
(V)
(A)
12:00 A.M.
77.200
1.576
12:30 P.M.
76.900
1.521
1:00 P.M.
76.500
1.423
1:30 P.M.
75.900
1.313
2:00 P.M.
75.400
1.200
2:30 P.M.
74.800
1.140
3:00 P.M.
74.100
0.986
3:30 P.M.
73.500
0.830
4:00 P.M.
72.900
0.677
61
Voltage at max.
Current at max.
Maximum power of
PV (Pmax) in (W)
12:00 A.M.
62.532
1.450
90.7
12:30 P.M.
62.289
1.399
87.1
1:00 P.M.
61.965
1.309
81.1
1:30 P.M.
61.479
1.208
78.7
2:00 P.M.
61.074
1.104
67.4
2:30 P.M.
60.588
1.049
63.5
3:00 P.M.
60.021
0.907
54.4
3:30 P.M.
59.535
0.764
45.5
4:00 P.M.
59.049
0.623
36.8
According to Table 4.1 and 4.2, the PV array generated power less than its maximun
value (120 W) because it was cloudy during the end of February and the mid of March.
As the consequence, the solar radiation was low which caused PV array generated less
energy.
Note that, the maximum power of the PV array (Pmax) was later used to determine the
efficiencies.
Now, let set up the experiment which will be used to investigate Vgrid, Igrid, Vpv, and Ipv.
Figure 4.18 depicts the positions of voltage-different probes and current probes which
were installed in the system in order to investigate the efficiency of the system. The
experimental results were summarized in
Figure 4.18 Positions of probes which were used to investigate the system efficiency
62
Time
PV power under
(V)
(A)
12:00 A.M.
64.303
1.230
79.3
12:30 P.M.
64.504
1.195
77.1
1:00 P.M.
64.848
1.216
78.9
1:30 P.M.
63.963
1.211
77.5
2:00 P.M.
63.707
1.157
73.7
2:30 P.M.
62.754
1.112
69.8
3:00 P.M.
63.214
0.987
62.4
3:30 P.M.
61.733
0.898
55.4
4:00 P.M.
61.312
0.747
45.8
Time
Power transferred to
(V)
(A)
12:00 A.M.
111.600
0.641
71.5
12:30 P.M.
111.200
0.627
69.7
1:00 P.M.
110.800
0.648
71.8
1:30 P.M.
111.500
0.619
69.0
2:00 P.M.
111.500
0.599
66.8
2:30 P.M.
110.800
0.567
62.8
3:00 P.M.
111.000
0.503
55.8
3:30 P.M.
110.600
0.455
50.3
4:00 P.M.
111.600
0.364
40.6
As a final point, the maximum power of PV array (Pmax), the PV array power under
MPPT (Pmppt), and the power transferred to grid (Pgrid) were the variables which were
used to investigate the performance of the system as summarized in Table 4.5.
63
(%)
(%)
(%)
12:00 A.M.
85.4
90.2
77.1
12:30 P.M.
85.7
90.4
77.5
1:00 P.M.
86.1
91.0
78.4
1:30 P.M.
85.9
89.3
76.8
2:00 P.M.
84.8
90.6
76.8
2:30 P.M.
86.1
90.0
77.5
3:00 P.M.
86.4
89.5
77.2
3:30 P.M.
86.1
90.8
78.1
4:00 P.M.
85.7
88.7
76.0
Time
As mentioned eariler, it was cloudy during the end of February and the mid of March.
The solar radiation was low because of the weather, hence the PV array could generate
less electrical energy than it maximum value (120 W). According to Table 4.5, the PV
array generated 85.9 W at 1.30 P.M. which is less than the generated power at 3.00 P.M.
because the cloud blocked the solar radiation. On the contrary, the sky was a bit clearier
at 3.30 P.M., therefore the PV array could generated electrical energy up to 78.1 W.
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSIONS
5.1 Conclusions
The conventional grid-connected PV system consists of a step-up converter, a single
phase inverter and a low-frequency transformer. The converter, which operates at high
switching frequency, steps up the PV array voltage. It also tracks the PV output power
and tends to transfer the maximum power to the inverter. The single phase inverter then
shapes the output current to be 50-Hz sinusoidal waveform by using high frequency
pulse-width modulation. Therefore, at least five switching elements (depending on the
converter topologies) must be operated at high switching frequency.
65
Vpv * I pv
Vmp * I mp
*100 =
Ppv
Pmax
*100
(5.1)
Where:
-
Ppv = PV output power in which the MPPT algorithm tracks along the
maximum power locus (W).
- Pmax = actual maximum power in which the PV array can provide at a given
solar radiation (W).
The second factor is the converter-inverter efficiency (inv). This factor is the efficiency
of the converter and the inverter which is calculated by
inv =
Vgrid * I grid
Vpv * I pv
*100 =
Pgrid
Ppv
*100
(5.2)
Where:
-
Pgrid
Pmax
(5.3)
66
67
igrid ( s )
iO ( s)
Z1 P Z 2 P Z 3 P ...
Z Ls + Z1 P Z 2 P Z3 P ...
(5.4)
So if the third harmonic currents are decided to be attenuated, the filter elements must
be chosen such that the series resonant frequency f1 coincides with the third harmonic
frequency. This frequency is simply the resonant frequency of the shunt impedance Z1,
yields
f1 =
1
1
=
2
2 L1C1
(5.5)
68
To eliminate other significant harmonics, filter elements must be properly chosen in the
same ways as the third harmonic trap filter is designed.
(a)
(b)
Figure 5.5 Harmonic trap filters
(a) the diagram
(b) equivalent circuits
REFERENCES
1. Mohan, N., Undeland, M.T. and Robbins, W. P., 1995, Power Electronics:
Convertrs, Applications, and Design, 2nded., John Wiley & Sons,
Canada, pp. 1-405.
2. Wilk, O.H., 1992, "Utility Connected Photovoltaic System",
International Energy Agency (IEA), 19-21 October 1992, Switzerland, pp. 87-98.
3. Rashid, M.H., 2001, "Power Electronics Handbook", Academic Press. Canada.
pp. 15-27,75-117,211-225,407-431,539-575.
4. Erickson, R.W. and Maksimovic, D., 2001, Fundamentals of Power
Electronics, 2'ld ed., Kluwer Academic Publishers, U.S.A., pp. 1-103. 13 1-406,
441-584, 761-800, 863-871.
5. Boegli, U. and Ulmi, R., 1986, "Realization of a New Inverter Circuit for Direct
Pl~otovoltaicEnergy Feedback into the Public Grid", IEEE Transactions on
Industrial Application, 30 March - 2 April 1986, U.S.A., pp. 1-10.
6. Analog Devices, 1995, ADSP-2100 Family User's Nlanual, 3rded., Analog
Devices, U.S.A., pp. 1-420.
pp. 405-41 3.
13. Ma, Y. and Smedley, K., 1997, "Switching Flow-Graph Nonlinear Modeling
Method for Multistate-Switching Converters", IEEE Transactions on Power
Electronics, Vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 854-861.
14. Tymerski, R. and Baumann, W.T., 1989, "Nonlinear Modeling of PWM
Switch", IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 4, No. 2,
pp. 225-233.
15. Bose, B.K., 1990, "An Adaptive Hysteresis-Band Current Control Technique of a
Voltge-Fed PWM Inverter for Machine Drive System", IEEE Transactions on
Industrial Electronics, Vol. 37, No. 5, pp. 402-408.
16. Chun. T. and Choi, M., 1996, -'Development of Adaptive Hysteresis Band Curreilt
Coiltrol Strategy of PWM Inverter with Constant Switching Frecluency", IEEE
Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 5. No. 2, pp. 194- 199.
17. Bowes, S.R. and Grewal, S., 1999, "Three-Phase Hysteresis Band Modulation
Strategy of Single-Phase PWM Inverters", IEEE Proceeding on Power
Electronics, Vol. 146, No. 6, pp. 695-706.
APPENDIX A
Specification Sheet of MSX-Lite 30 Solar Module
72
73
APPENDIX B
Transformer Design
75
Appendix B presents the formulas which are used to calculate the characteristics of the
isolated transformer such as the primary winding turn number, the secondary winding
turn number, the magnetizing inductance, and so on. These formulas are referenced
from [4]. After redeveloping these formulas as an M-file, MATHLAB6.1 can finally be
used to determine the transformer characteristics. Note that, the sentences which follow
% are the programmers comments, whereas other are the formulas under M-file
format.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%
%
%
The following quantities are specified by the designer.
%
%
%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% Power Output
Po
(W)
Pin = 119.7;
% Input Voltage
Vin
(V)
Vin = 68.4;
% Output Voltage
Vo
(V)
Vorms = 220;
Vo = Vorms*sqrt(2);
% Input current
I1
(A)
Iin = 1.75;
% Output current
I2
(A)
Iorms = 0.54;
Io = Iorms*sqrt(2);
% Primary Votage
V at D = 0.5
Vp = Vin;
% Secondary Votage
V at D = 0.5
Vs = 440;
% Primary RMS Current
A at D = 0.5
Ip = Iin;
% Secondary RMS Current
A at D = 0.5
Is = 0.54;
% Frequency
f
(Hz)
f = 10000;
% Efficiency
n
n = 1;
% Regulation
Reg (%)
Reg = 1.0;
% Flux density
Bm
(T)
Bm = 0.3;
% Winding fill factor
Ku
Ku = 0.5;
% Applied primary volt-seconds
% Lamda = Intergral of positive cycle v(t) by dt (V-sec)
Lamda = 0.00342;
% Core material:
% Core Type:
% Core cross-sectional area
FDK 6H20
ETD-49
Ac
(cm2)
76
Ac = 2.11;
% Core window area
Wa = 2.71;
% Mean length per turn
MLT = 8.51;
% Macnatic path length
lm = 11.4;
% Constant
Role = 1.724e-6;
Kf = 4.44;
u0 = 4*pi*1e-7;
u = 0.00125;
Ap = Wa*Ac;
Wa
(cm2)
MLT (cm)
lm
(cm)
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%
%
%
Transformer formulas are as follow.
%
%
%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 1. Calculate the transformer input and output power
%
Pp = Vp*Ip
(W)
%
Ps = Vs*Is
(W)
Pp = Vp*Ip;
Ps = Vs*Is;
sprintf('\b\b\b\b\b\b\b1. Calculate the transformer input and output power.\n\tPp
= %0.5g W',Pp)
sprintf('\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\tPs = %0.5g W',Ps)
% 2. Calculate the total apparent power Pt:
%
Pt = Pp+Ps
(W)
Pt = Pp+Ps;
sprintf('\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b2. Calculate the total apparent power.\n\tPt = %0.5g
W',Pt)
% 3. Calculate the electrical conditions:
%
Ke = 0.145*Kf^2*f^2*Bm^2*1e-4
Ke = 0.145*Kf^2*f^2*Bm^2*1e-4;
sprintf('\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b3. Calculate the electrical conditions.\n\tKe = %0.5g
,Ke)
% 4. Calculate the core geometry coefficient:
%
Kg = Pt/(2*Ke*Reg)
(cm5)
Kg = Pt/(2*Ke*Reg);
sprintf('\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b4. Calculate the core geometry coefficient.\n\tKg >=
%0.5g cm5',Kg)
77
(Turns)
Np = (Vp*1e4)/(Kf*Bm*f*Ac);
sprintf('\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b5. The number of primary turns.\n\tNp = %0.5g Turns.'
,Np)
% 6. Calculate the primary current Ip:
%
Ip = (Pp)/(Vp*n)
(A)
Ip = (Pp)/(Vp*n);
sprintf('\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b6. The primary current.\n\tIp = %0.5g A.',Ip)
% 7. Calculate the current density J:
%
J = (Pt*1e4)/(Kf*Ku*f*Bm*Ap)
(A/cm2)
J = (Pt*1e4)/(Kf*Ku*f*Bm*Ap);
sprintf('\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b7. Calculate the current density.\n\tJ = %0.5g A/cm2.',J)
% 8. Calculate the wire size of the primary Aw1:
%
Aw1 = Ip/J
(cm2)
Aw1 = Ip/J;
sprintf('\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b8. Calculate the wire size of the primary.\n\tAw1 =
%0.5g cm2.',Aw1)
sprintf('\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\t** Select a wire size from the table. Remember: If
the wire area isnt within 10 percent, take the next smallest size. **')
% 9. Calculate the number of secondary turns Ns:
%
Ns = ((Np*Vs)/Vp)*(1+(Reg/100)) (Turns)
Ns = ((Np*Vs)/Vp)*(1+(Reg/100));
sprintf('\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b9. The number of secondary turns.\n\tNs = %0.5g
Turns.',Ns)
% 10. Calculate the wire size of the secondary Aw2:
%
Aw2 = Is/J
(cm2)
Aw2 = Is/J;
sprintf('\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b10. Calculate the wire size of the secondary.\n\tAw2 =
%0.5g cm2.',Aw2)
sprintf('\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\t** Select a wire size from the table. Remember: If
the wire area isnt within 10 percent, take the next smallest size. **')
% Check the winding resistance.
sprintf('\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\n11. Check the calculations.')
78
(H)
Lm = (u*Np^2*Ac)/lm;
sprintf('\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\n\tMagnetizing inductance referred to winding1.
\n\tLm = %0.5g H',Lm)
% Magmetization reluctant
%
R = lm/(u*Ac)
R = lm/(u*Ac);
sprintf('\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\n\tMagnetization reluctant.\n\tR = %0.5g ',R)
% Peak ac magnetizing current, referred to winding 1
%
Impk = lamda/(2*Lm)
(A)
Impk = Lamda/(2*Lm);
sprintf('\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\n\tPeak ac magnetizing current referred to winding1.
\n\tImpk = %0.5g A',Impk)
% Magnetizing Resistance, referred to winding 1
%
Rm = Vp/Impk
(Ohm)
Rm = Vp/Impk;
sprintf('\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\n\tMagnetizing Resistance referred to winding 1.
\n\tRm = %0.5g Ohm',Rm)
% Winding resistances
%
R1 =(Role*n1*MLT)/(Aw1)
%
R2 =(Role*n2*MLT)/(Aw2)
(Ohm)
(Ohm)
Rp =(Role*Np*MLT)/(Aw1);
Rs =(Role*Ns*MLT)/(Aw2);
sprintf('\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\n\tWinding resistances.\n\t Rp = %0.5g Ohm',Rp)
sprintf('\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\tRs = %0.5g Ohm',Rs)
APPENDIX C
Inductor Design
80
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%
%
%
The following quantities are specified by the designer.
%
%
%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% Inductor
L
(H)
L = 100e-3;
% Output Voltage
Vo
(V)
Vorms = 220;
Vo = Vorms*sqrt(2);
% DC Current
Io
(A)
Iorms = 1;
Io = Iorms*sqrt(2);
% AC Current
dI
(A)
dI = 0.1;
% Output Power
Po
(W)
Po = 220;
% Frequency
f
(Hz)
f = 10000;
% Efficiency
n
n = 1;
% Regulation
Reg (%)
Reg = 1.0;
% Flux density
Bm
(T)
Bm = 0.9;
% Winding fill factor
Ku
Ku = 0.5;
% Applied primary volt-seconds
% Lamda = Intergral of positive cycle v(t) by dt (V-sec)
Lamda = 0.00342;
% Core material:
% Core Type:
% Core cross-sectional area
Ac = 2.11;
% Core window area
Wa = 2.71;
% Mean length per turn
MLT = 8.51;
% Macnatic path length
lm = 11.4;
% G Dimention = 2*F I guess!
G = 2*1.77;
% Constant
Role = 1.724e-6;
Kf = 4.44;
u0 = 4*pi*1e-7;
u = 0.00125;
Ap = Wa*Ac;
FDK 6H20
ETD-49
Ac
(cm2)
Wa
(cm2)
MLT (cm)
lm
(cm)
(cm)
81
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%
%
%
Inductor formulas are as follow.
%
%
%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 1. Calculate the energy-handing capability:
%
E = (L*(Iorms+(dI/2))^2)/2
W-s
E = (L*(Iorms+(dI/2))^2)/2;
sprintf('\b\b\b\b\b\b\b1. Calculate the energy-handing capability.\n\tE = %0.5g
W-s',E)
% 2. Calculate the electrical conditions:
%
Ke = 0.145*Po*Bm^2*1e-4
Ke = 0.145*Po*Bm^2*1e-4;
sprintf('\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b2. Calculate the electrical conditions.\n\tKe = %0.5g
,Ke)
% 3. Calculate the core geometry coefficient:
%
Kg = E^2/(Ke*Reg)
cm5
Kg = (E^2)/(Ke*Reg);
sprintf('\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b3. Calculate the core geometry coefficient.\n\tKg >=
%0.5g cm5',Kg)
% 4. Calculate the current density J:
%
J = (2*E*1e4)/(Bm*Ap*Ku) (A/cm2)
J = (2*E*1e4)/(Bm*Ap*Ku);
sprintf('\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b4. Calculate the current density.\n\tJ = %0.5g A/cm2.',J)
% 5. Calculate the bare wire size of the primary Aw1:
%
Aw = (Iorms+(dI/2))/J
(cm2)
Aw = (Iorms+(dI/2))/J;
sprintf('\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b5. Calculate the wire size of the primary.\n\tAw = %0.5g
cm2.',Aw)
sprintf('\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\t** Select a wire size from the table. Remember: If
the wire area isnt within 10 percent, take the next smallest size. **')
% 6. Calculate the effective window area Waeff.
%
A typical alue for S3 is 0.75, as shown in Chapter 6.
%
Waeff = Wa*S3
(cm2)
S3 =0.75;
Waeff = Wa*S3;
sprintf('\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b6. Calculate the effective window area.\n\tWaeff =
%0.5g cm2.',Waeff)
82
83
CURRICULM VITAE
NAME
DATE OF BIRTH
20 April 1976
EDUCATIONAL RECORD
HIGH SCHOOL
High School Graduation
Wicheinmatu School, 1993
BACHELORS DEGREE
Bachelor of Engineering (Electrical Engineering)
King Mongkuts University of Technolgy Thonburi, 1997
MASTERS DEGREE
Master of Engineering (Electrical Engineering)
King Mongkuts University of Technolgy Thonburi, 2002
PUBLICATION
s h n s ~ ~ u r n o a : s ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ u ~ t ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~