Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
INTRODUCTION
The Russian financial crisis also called "Ruble crisis" or the "Russian Flu" hit
Russia in the year 1998. The Russian financial crisis took the world by
surprise and Russia was successful in fighting its inflation and was slowly
progressing as the GDP had turned into positive values and the prospects
very promising for the next year.
The meltdown of the Russian crisis of 1998 can be found in the Russia's
economic structure, internal environment and its political processes. Whilst
the crisis must be seen in the context of policy failures and abortive reform
efforts during the 1990s, its unfolding reflected mismanagement of the
opening of the country's financial markets to foreign lenders and investors
which left the country vulnerable to the risk that domestic financial
difficulties (such as those of the management of the market for government
debt instruments) could be transformed into a full-blown currency crisis.
Historical Background
The Russian Crisis of 1998 was triggered by overhauled peg of Russian
ruble, the external economic shocks of due to the Asian financial crisis of
1997/98 and the unsustainable accumulation of government debt. Though
these were the immediate causes for the Russian Crisis there were also
other factors that contributed to the crisis. Systemic weaknesses in the
Russian political economy were major causal factors that directly led to the
eventual crisis. The underlying weaknesses in the Russian banking system,
the power of the Financial Industrial Groups and the systems of tax
evasion, non-payments and arrears which all stemmed from the faculty and
the corrupt reform movement that characterized the break-up of the Soviet
Union and the collapse of the command economy lie at the heart of the
financial crisis and the endemic weaknesses in the Russian economy.
The process of economic transformation in Russia has been marked by a
prolonged transitional depression and macroeconomic instability: seven
years of continuing decline resulted in a cumulative drop of GDP by more
than 40% between 1989 and 1996; in that period there were also several
Russian Financial Crisis 1998 | Kamran Shabbir
The fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Soviet empire were not
merely political events that marked the end of the nuclear standoff and the
arrival of democracy to the people of Eastern Europe.
The revolution in Russia was a peculiar phenomenon as the dissolution of
communism was an elite led project which involved the repudiation of an old
order without the turnover of power to a new elite backed by a fresh
ideological commitment. In Eastern Europe, the expulsion of Soviet troops
provided a rallying point for the people and a new ideological consensus
emerged which involved a removal of the old regime and the empowerment
of a new class of citizens backed by the masses. The physical change of
power and the rhetoric of liberation provided the political capital to the new
elites to embark on wholesale reform measures which transformed the
economic foundations of the state and engineered the creation of a new
political economic order based on Western principles of governance.
However, in Russia, these sweeping changes did not occur as quickly or as
thoroughly in the immediate years following the end of Soviet rule. There
was no public or elite consensus on the evils of the past as those in the elite
Soviet classes were the same elites still in power and the rhetoric of
liberation was ill suited to a Russian population who were the main
Russian Financial Crisis 1998 | Kamran Shabbir
Economic Indicators
Since May 1998 Russia has experienced declining gross domestic product
(GDP), increasing inflation, increasing unemployment, and staggering
interest rates. These trends connote a halt to, and possibly a reversal of, the
progress, albeit limited, that Russia was finally making in establishing
sustainable economic growth and macroeconomic stability.
Falling GDP
Official Russian statistics estimate that the Russian real (adjusted for
inflation) GDP contracted 4.6% in 1998. This contraction occurred after the
Russian economy finally realized economic growth, although modest, of0.8%
in 1997, after having declined close to 40% since 1991. Russian GDP is
projected to drop even further in 1999.2 A contracting economy, especially
over a long period, leads to a deterioration in living standards.
High Inflation
The Russian inflation rate in 1998, using the consumer price index, hit
84.4%. This figure appeared to be a significant setback for the Russian
economy which had realized a manageable inflation rate of 11% in 1997.3
High inflation rates (as high as 2,500% in 1992) had been a major challenge
to Russian economic policymakers ever since Russia embarked on economic
reform in late 1991, but they seemed to have gotten it under control until
recently. High inflation robs holders of rubles of potential purchasing power,
contributing to a decline in the living standard. Inflation is especially
debilitating financially to pensioners and others on fixed incomes.
The graph shows that inflation had fallen from 131% in 1995 to 22% in
1996 to 11% in 1997 and looked very promising for the next year.
Rising Unemployment
Economic contraction has led to growing unemployment in Russia. By the
end of 1998, the Russian unemployment rate had reached close to 12%
having increased from 7.0% in 1994.5.
While the current crisis cannot be blamed entirely for the unemployment
problem, the decline in economic growth has set back attempts to reduce it.
Investor fears and worries severely weakened the Russian money markets
(stock, currency, and bond) this forced Russia to devalue the ruble, and
default on some risk, lowering prices and GDP further in 1998 and 1999.
Conclusion
The Russian Crisis of 1998 was mainly triggered due to Russias economic
structure, internal environment and its political processes. Russias 1998
failure was another instance of how financial globalization is related to the
crisis in an emerging market instead of better resource allocation and faster
growth. The crisis must be seen in the context of policy failures and abortive
reform efforts during the 1990s, its unfolding reflected mismanagement of
the opening of the country's financial markets to foreign lenders and
investors which left the country vulnerable to the risk that domestic financial
difficulties (such as those of the management of the market for government
debt instruments) could be transformed into a full-blown currency crisis.
Therefore, now the task of policy makers is to restore the financial stability
of Russia and reform its policies which will basically focus on building the
institutional framework for market based activity. Lessons from the Russian
crisis should not be restricted only to government's mismanagement of the
opening of its financial markets to foreign investors and lenders or the
vulnerabilities associated with reliance on capital inflows for financing fiscal
deficits but also irrational exuberance and herd behaviour of international
lenders and investors in entering as well as exiting emerging markets.
Russian crisis has once again emphasized the inadequacy of current
arrangements for dealing with global financial instability.
Russian Financial Crisis 1998 | Kamran Shabbir