Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
INTRODUCTION
A good knowledge of Organizational Behavior is important for all of us. This is because we all are
members of some kind of organizations. The smallest organization we belong to is our family!
In this course we will focus our attention on creating, fostering and managing organizations in
which people thrive and perform at their best. The core premise of our approach is that managerial
excellence (and personal flourishing) is fundamentally tied to creating/enabling organizational
contexts that build human strengths and unlock the positive dynamics of vibrant human
communities.
Historically, the field of organizational behavior has accumulated almost 90 or more years of
experience in studying and explaining organizational life. OB addresses topics such as: how
organizational cultures and subcultures affect organizational performance, how to motivate and
reward people, what makes work groups function effectively, the impact of leadership styles and
communication, how to gain power and influence, how to diagnose need for change, how to create
change, and how to design jobs and organizations.
You will be required to complete several activities in order to achieve the identified objectives:
2. Attendance is required at all class sessions to fully make use of and participate in all class
discussions. That being said, I recognize that, at times, professional and personal
emergencies may arise which may prevent one from attending class. Let’s all be
intrinsically motivated to contribute and learn from each other! Everyone should strive to be
off to a “fast start” by being enthusiastically and actively engaged.
In the first day of the class twelve groups with 2 to 6 members in each will be formed for the group
assignments. Please “self-select” into your groups.
Please do not rely too much on the Internet for your research. Spend some time in the library—
there are greater opportunities for serendipitous results.
Class presentations are based on the readings assigned to specific groups. The presentation
should include:
1. Key ideas discussed in the paper
2. Why these ideas are important and any points in the reading (article), which you disagree
with?
3. How can the useful ideas discussed in the paper be translated into actual practice?
4. What is the best way to teach these ideas in practice (in the class or at work)?
The major aim of this exercise is to initiate a good class discussion. All of you are STRONGLY
encouraged to read ALL these readings thoroughly before every class. In every class, two
groups will make oral presentations on the readings, which are assigned to them. These
presentations will be of 10-15 minutes in duration followed by a brief class discussion. We will
keep the duration of the presentations flexible depending on how well the discussions develop
in class.
Class Expectations
Introduction to OB
Week 2 08/29 Individuals and Organization Chapters 2,
Personality, Perception and Well-Being 3 and 7
Readings:
A. Priestland and R. Hanig, “Developing First Level
Leaders”, HBR, June 2005 (Group 01)
MBTI assessment
MBTI (feedback)
Readings:
Readings:
W.H. Startbuck, “Why I stopped trying to understand
the real world”, Organization Studies, 25(7), 1233-
1254, 2004 (Group 03)
Readings:
Bartlett, C.A. & Ghoshal, S. 2002. Building competitive
advantage through people. Sloan Management Review,43-2:
34-41. (Group7)
Readings:
F. Ferraro, J. Pfeffer and R.I. Sutton, “Economic Language
and Assumptions: How Theories Can Become Self-Fulfilling”,
Academy of Management Rev., vol.30, no.1, Jan. 2005
(Group 9)
Readings:
I. Royer, “ Why Bad Projects are So Hard to Kill”, HBR, Feb.
2003 (Group 11)
Readings:
K. Shimizu and M.A. Hitt, “Strategic Flexibility: Organizational
Preparedness to Reverse Inefective Strategic Decisions”,
The Academy of Management Executive, vol.18, No.4, Nov.
2004 (Group 1)
Readings:
Kirkman, B. L. & Colleagues. 2002. Five Challenges to
Virtual Team Success: Lessons from Sabre, Inc. Academy
of Management Executive, 16 (3): 67-79 (Group 3)
Readings:
Nonaka and Takeuchi, “The Knowledge creating company”
HBR, Nov-Dec. 1986 (Group 5)
Readings:
Charles Handy, “What is a Business For”, HBR, Dec. 1, 2002
(Group 9)
The grades in the activities in which you will be participating will be combined to determine your
final course grade. Please note that items 1 and 2 below will be multiplied with a peer evaluation
multiplier* to get your effective grade. The relative weights are as follows:
Total 100%
* Peer Evaluations (to be completed at the end of the final class meeting)
All group members are expected to do their fair share of work on the assignments. Fortunately, in
about 85 to 90 percent of the groups this is not the case. Unfortunately, that leaves (historically)
approximately 10-15 percent of the groups in which inequities occur. Since I do not know which
groups have such a problem, I will use peer evaluations for all groups. For such a system to work,
everyone must be honest and fair. First, if a group member(s) is making only a nominal contribution
and/or is overly difficult to work with, the other group member(s) may expel them/her/him from the
group and this individual must complete the assignment individually within two weeks after the due
date. Second, all groups members should assign a certain points to themselves and to other group
members based on the following three dimensions:
1. Contribution (this includes data collection and time spend on constructive discussions)
2. Command over the subject matter
3. Team work
A final grade-multiplier will calculated based on the total points every individual gets from self and
other group members.
EXAMPLE: You should start with a total point of 100 x (number of members in the group). If your
group has 8 members, start with 800 points. Distribute 800 points to your group based on the
above three dimensions. If a person gets 100 each from every other member including herself,
then her grade-multiplier will be 1 (800/800 = 1). If another person gets a total of 780, then his
grade-multiplier will be 0.975 (780/800 = 0.975). If your total point is 900, then your grade-multiplier
will be 1.125 (900/800 = 1.125).
CLIENT-CONSULTANT ROLE-PLAY (FIRST ROUND)
G1-G2-G3
Consultant Client Date Time
G1 G2 (Motivation) September 17 2005 09.00-09.15
G2 G3 (Decision September 17 2005 09.15-09.30
Making)
G3 G1 (Individual September 17 2005 09.30-10.45
Development)
G4-G5-G6
Consultant Client Date Time
G4 G5 (Motivation) September 24 2005 09.00-09.15
G5 G6 (Decision September 24 2005 09.15-09.30
Making)
G6 G4 (Individual September 24 2005 09.30-10.45
Development)
G7-G8-G9
Consultant Client Date Time
G7 G8 (Motivation) October 01 2005 09.00-09.15
G8 G9 (Decision October 01 2005 09.15-09.30
Making)
G9 G7 (Individual October 01 2005 09.30-10.45
Development)
G10-G11-G12
Consultant Client Date Time
G10 G11 (Motivation) October 08 2005 09.00-09.15
G11 G12 (Decision October 08 2005 09.15-09.30
Making)
G12 G10 (Individual October 08 2005 09.30-10.45
Development)
SECOND ROUND
G1-G2-G3
Consultant Client Date Time
G1 G2 (Motivation) October 15 2005 09.00-09.15
G2 G3 (Decision October 15 2005 09.15-09.30
Making)
G3 G1 (Individual October 15 2005 09.30-10.45
Development)
G4-G5-G6
Consultant Client Date Time
G4 G5 (Motivation) October 29 2005 09.00-09.15
G5 G6 (Decision October 29 2005 09.15-09.30
Making)
G6 G4 (Individual October 29 2005 09.30-10.45
Development)
G7-G8-G9
Consultant Client Date Time
G7 G8 (Motivation) November 05 2005 09.00-09.15
G8 G9 (Decision November 05 2005 09.15-09.30
Making)
G9 G7 (Individual November 05 2005 09.30-10.45
Development)
G10-G11-G12
Consultant Client Date Time
G10 G11 (Motivation) November 12 2005 09.00-09.15
G11 G12 (Decision November 12 2005 09.15-09.30
Making)
G12 G10 (Individual November 12 2005 09.30-10.45
Development)