APPENDIX 2-3

Rubrics for Evaluating Written Report PBL 2

SCHOOL OF COMPUTING
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES
COURSE CODE
: STID3024
COURSE NAME : SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
PRE REQUISITE : STIA1014 INTRODUCTION TO PROGRAMMING
Rubric for Evaluating Written Report
Group: ___________________________
Name

Matric. No.

_______________________________________________

____________

_______________________________________________

____________

_______________________________________________

____________

_______________________________________________

____________

_______________________________________________
Mark
Sectio

n
Marks

/20

/10

/20

/10

Total
Marks
/60

____________

APPENDIX 2-3

a)

Rubrics for Evaluating Written Report PBL 2

Sequence Diagram (20%)

Attribute

Criteria

2
(below
expectations)
Incomplete
notation

Scale of Score
3
(meet
expectations)
Using correct
notation

Actor

Notation

1
(not
acceptable)
Poor notation

Object

Notation

Poor notation

Incomplete
notation

Using correct
notation

Naming
Conversio
n

Jargons of
naming
conversion

Message

Naming
Conversio
n

Jargons of
naming
conversion

Flow of
Events

Notation

Poor notation

Some
inappropriate of
naming
conversion
Some
inappropriate of
naming
conversion
Incomplete
notation

Using
appropriate
naming
conversion
Using
appropriate
naming
conversion
Using correct
notation

Notes

Usage

Poor Usage

Incomplete or
not well usage

Complete Usage

Overall Diagram

Poorly design

Incomplete or
not well designed

Complete design

Total Scores

4
(exceeds
expectations)
Completely using
standard of
notation
Completely using
standard of
notation
Using appropriate
standard of
naming conversion

N/A
(not
available)
Not
provided in
the report
Not
provided in
the report
Not
provided in
the report

Using appropriate
standard of
naming conversion

Not
provided in
the report

Completely using
standard of
notation
Clear and
completely follows
standard
Clear and
completely follows
standard of design

Not
provided in
the report
Not
provided in
the report
Not
provided in
the report

Score

__ x
20%
28

APPENDIX 2-3

Rubrics for Evaluating Written Report PBL 2

b)

Communication Diagram (10%)

Attribute

Criteria

2
(below
expectations)
Incomplete
notation

Scale of Score
3
(meet
expectations)
Using correct
notation

Actor

Notation

1
(not
acceptable)
Poor notation

Object

Notation

Poor notation

Incomplete
notation

Using correct
notation

Naming
Conversio
n

Jargons of
naming
conversion

Message

Naming
conversio
n

Jargons of
naming
conversion

Flow of
Events

Notation

Poor notation

Some
inappropriate of
naming
conversion
Some
inappropriate of
naming
conversion
Incomplete
notation

Using
appropriate
naming
conversion
Using
appropriate
naming
conversion
Using correct
notation

Some mapping

Mapping

Mapping with
sequence diagram
(analysis phase)

A few mapping

4
(exceeds
expectations)
Completely using
standard of
notation
Completely using
standard of
notation
Using appropriate
standard of
naming conversion

N/A
(not
available)
Not
provided in
the report
Not
provided in
the report
Not
provided in
the report

Using appropriate
standard of
naming conversion

Not
provided in
the report

Completely using
standard of
notation
Completely
Mapping

Not
provided in
the report
Not
mapping

Score

APPENDIX 2-3

Rubrics for Evaluating Written Report PBL 2

Overall Diagram

Poorly design

Incomplete or
not well designed

Complete design

Clear and
completely follows
standard of design

Not
provided in
the report
__ x
10%
28
=

Total Scores

c)

Class Diagram (20%)

Notation

1
(not
acceptable)
Poor notation

2
(below
expectations)
Incomplete
notation

Scale of Score
3
(meet
expectations)
Using correct
notation

Naming
Conversio
n

Jargons of
naming
conversion

Attribute

Naming
Conversio
n

Jargons of
naming
conversion

Method

Naming
Conversio
n

Jargons of
naming
conversion

Some
inappropriate of
naming
conversion
Some
inappropriate of
naming
conversion
Some
inappropriate of
naming

Using
appropriate
naming
conversion
Using
appropriate
naming
conversion
Using
appropriate
naming

Attribute
Class

Criteria

4
(exceeds
expectations)
Completely using
standard of
notation
Using appropriate
standard of
naming conversion

N/A
(not
available)
Not
provided in
the report
Not
provided in
the report

Using appropriate
standard of
naming conversion

Not
provided in
the report

Using appropriate
standard of
naming conversion

Not
provided in
the report

Score

APPENDIX 2-3

Rubrics for Evaluating Written Report PBL 2

conversion
Incomplete
notation

conversion
Using correct
notation

Poor notation

Incomplete
notation

Using correct
notation

Mapping with
Sequence Diagram
(design phase)

A few mapping

Some mapping

Mapping

Overall Diagram

Poorly design

Incomplete or
not well designed

Complete design

Associatio
n

Notation

Poor notation

Multiplicit
y

Notation

Completely using
standard of
notation
Completely using
standard of
notation
Completely
Mapping

Not
provided in
the report
Not
provided in
the report
Not
mapping

Clear and
completely follows
standard of design

Not
provided in
the report
__ x
20%
32
=

Total Scores

d)

Report Mechanics (10%)

Attribute

1
(not
acceptable)

2
(below
expectations)

Organization

Inappropriate
content of
several
sections of
report

Some content
placed incorrectly
in report

Score
3
(meet
expectations)
Content
appropriate to all
section in the
report

4
(exceeds
expectations)
Excellent
organization
enhances
readability and /or
understandability
of report

N/A
(not available)

Not provided in
the report

Score

APPENDIX 2-3

Rubrics for Evaluating Written Report PBL 2

Format

So many
format errors
as to make
report
ineffective

A few format
errors

Followed specified
format

Unique format
aspects that
enhance report
impact

Not provided in
the report

Spelling

So many
spelling errors

Only spelling
errors are different
spellings for same
pronunciation

No spelling errors

Perfect

Not provided in
the report

Grammar and
punctuation

Pages or
paragraphs
with multiple
grammar and
punctuation
errors

A few significant
grammar and
punctuation errors

Minor grammar
and punctuation
errors

No grammar and
punctuation errors

Not provided in
the report

Use of
software to
prepare
written report

Sloppy

Poor

Appropriate

Superior clarity

Not provided in
the report

Total Scores

__ x
10%
20
=