Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
One
Quick Reminder
Strong Notes:
If you were to conduct hypothesis testing of a
specific independent variable involving 3 or
more levels
levels.
.
You cannot draw a directly-transitive
conclusion from multiple t tests among the
different groups (as permitted by t tests)!
Instead, you have to employ a one
one--way
O (so
et e ca
ed F test
test) for
o tthiss
ANOVA
(sometime
called
purpose.
As for t tests, the aim of one-way ANOVA is to
determine whether the null hypothesis (Ho)
can be safely rejected
About One
One--Way ANOVA
9 ANOVA is an evaluation of the random differences between scores or
subjects. In any research involving three or more groups, with each
subjects
group containing several subjects, it is possible that any differences
between the groups are due either to experimental manipulation or to
chance differences between the subjects in the different groups
groups.
For example, the means of the three groups shown in Table 13.1 are all
different from one another. The type 1 pedal arrangement has a mean of
2 errors, whereas the type 2 pedal arrangement has a mean of 3.8 errors
and the type 3 pedal arrangement has a mean of 5.4 errors. These
differences may be because increasing the separation between the
pedals causes more errors, or because just by chance the people who
pedal errors were assigned
g
to the type
yp 3 p
pedal
tend to make more p
arrangement.
If the Ho is true and the independent variable has no real effect, then the
differences in the number of errors for the three pedal arrangements are
due solely to chance differences in the drivers' abilities.
Executable by SPSS
Drawing up a Conclusion
The Example:
Example
You are to study the factor of unintended
acceleration that cause road accident. It is
hypothesised that the distance between
the brake and the accelerator pedals
plays a contributing factor in driver error
that cause road accident. To test this
hypothesis you design an experiment in
hypothesis,
which subjects use one of three driving
simulators, each with a different pedal
arrangement. In the close-pedal
arrangement, the distance between
pedals is only 1 inch; in the moderatepedal arrangement, it's 2 inches; and in
the far-pedal arrangement, 3 inches.
You assign ten subjects to each condition
and instruct
instr ct them to dri
drive
e their sim
simulators
lators
for 4 hours. During these 4 hours, the
number of errors made by each driver is
recorded.
The Hypotheses
The null hypothesis:
hypothesis
Ho : There is no difference between the sample means of
any of the level
Ho : 1 = 2 = .. = k
where k is the number of levels of the independent variable
(Refer to Example)
where
is the mean for kth group
k
where
is the mean for kth group
(Refer to Example)
(Refer to Example)
(Refer to Example)
10
(Refer to Example)
11
(Refer to Example)
9 In the example,
= 28.930/1.481 = 19.534
dfbg = k 1
dfwg = (n1 1) + (n2 1) + . + (nk 1)
where
k
nm
12
(Refer to Example)
9 In the example,
example
dfbg = 3 1 = 2
dfwg = (10 1) + (10 1) + (10 1) = 27
Drawing Up A Conclusion
The hypothesis testing for ANOVA is concluded in
a similar way as we do for t tests.
In ANOVA, we refer to Table F to identify the
critical value of F (denoted by Fcv)
Table F is arranged so that we look for the computed
degrees of freedom between groups (i.e. dfbg) in the
row at the top of the table (denoted by dfN).
The corresponding degrees of freedom within
groups (i.e. dfwg) is in the most left column of the
table (denoted by dfD)
13
(Refer to Example)
Fcv = 3.35
Conclusion:
Conclusion
Observe that, with = 0.05, the F = 19.534 lies in the
rejection region (as F > Fcv).
Thus,
we can reject
there iis a
Th
j t H0 and
d acceptt H1 (i.e.
(i th
difference between at least two of the pedal
arrangements and the difference is sigificant)
with F 1
If the estimates are very different (i.e. the F value is large), then
at least one of the samples probably comes from a population
different from the other samples, so the H1 is true (i.e. we can
safely reject Ho)
14
Recall that, in the example, using the Table F with = 0.05, dfN = 2
and dfD = 27, the critical value of F value is Fcv = 3.35
The computed F = 19.354 is large as compared to Fcv (i.e. much
larger than 3.35 that we get from the Table F at = 0.05!!).
Therefore, it is very probable for H1 to occur (i.e. very unlikely for Ho
to occur!).
This tells us that the probability for Ho to occur is very small (i.e. less
than the prescribed ).Thefore we reject Ho and accept H1
15
SS
df
MS
Between groups
SSbg
dfbg
MSbg
Within group
SSwg
dfwg
MSwg
Total
SStotal
dftotal
SS
df
MS
Between groups
SSbg
dfbg
MSbg
Within group
SSwg
dfwg
MSwg
Total
SStotal
dftotal
16
(Refer to Example)
17
where
MSwg
q = 3.53
18
This HSD value tells us that any difference between means of 1.359
pedal errors or greater is significant.
Let's examine the differences between the means of the various
pedal arrangement types. The means for types 1, 2, and 3,
respectively, are 2 errors, 3.8 errors, and 5.4 errors. The difference
between the means for types 1 and 2 is 1.8 errors, which is greater
than the required 1.359. The difference between the means for types
1 and 3 is 3.4
1.6
3 4 errors,
errors and the difference between types 2 and 3 is 1
6
errors, both of which are also greater than the HSD of 1.359.
Thus, in this experiment all three pedal arrangements are
significantly different from one another. Based on these results,
automobile designers should choose pedal arrangement 1 because
drivers who used it made significantly fewer errors.
Performing One
One--Way ANOVA
Tests Using SPSS
19
Group
Type
Group
Type
ONEWAY
Type BY Group
/MISSING ANALYSIS
/POSTHOC = TUKEY ALPHA(.05).
ANOVA
Type
Sum of Squares
df
Mean Square
Sig.
Between
Groups
57.8667
28.9333
19.530
0.000
Within Groups
40.000
27
1.4815
Total
97.8667
29
Sig. = p
20
Method 1
Method 2
Conclusion::
Conclusion
21
(I) Group
Group 1
Group 2
Group 3
(J) Group
Group 2
Group 3
Group 1
Group 3
Group 1
Group 2
Mean
Difference
(I-J)
-1.800*
-3.400*
1.800*
-1.600*
3.400*
1.600*
Std. Error
.544
.544
.544
.544
.544
.544
Sig.
.007
.000
.007
.018
.000
.018
Conclusion:
The F Distribution
22
23
24