Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
)
)
)
)
)
At a status conference on October 10, 2014, prosecutors advised the Court that, in
connection with the possible testimony of Mr. Risen, they were in the process of complying with
the revised regulations governing the issuance of subpoenas to members of the news media. 28
C.F.R. 50.10. At subsequent hearings on November 20, 2014, and December 9, 2014, the
government reiterated that the authorization process remained ongoing.
2.
The 50.10 approval process has now concluded, and pursuant to that regulation,
the Attorney General has authorized the issuance of a subpoena for the testimony of Mr. Risen at
trial as well as any necessary pre-trial hearings. The Attorney General has authorized prosecutors
to seek Mr. Risens testimony with regard to the following facts:
a.
That Mr. Risen has a confidentiality agreement with his source (or sources) for
Chapter Nine of his book State of War and that he will not breach that agreement (or agreements);
b.
That Mr. Risen authored Chapter Nine of his book State of War, a March 2, 2002
newspaper article entitled Fired by C.I.A., He says Agency Practiced Bias; and a November 4,
2001 newspaper article entitled Secret C.I.A. Site in New York Was Destroyed on Sept. 11, that the
chapter and articles accurately reflect information provided to him by his source (or sources), that
statements attributed to an unnamed source were, in fact, made by an unnamed source, and that
statements attributed to an identified source were, in fact, made by an identified source; and
c.
Jeffrey Sterling.
3.
Mr. Risen has at no time indicated a willingness to identify his source or sources.
On that point, Mr. Risen has been consistent: under no circumstances would he provide such
testimony. Risens counsel recently indicated that Mr. Risen continues to take this position.
4.
During the hearing on October 12, 2011, the Court endorsed the idea of convening
a hearing to moot Mr. Risens examination prior to his appearance before the jury at trial. Dkt.
No. 269 at 31-34. As it did in 2011, the government concurs. A moot of Mr. Risens testimony
would permit the parties to see exactly what questions Mr. Risen will answer, while leaving
sufficient time to resolve any related disputes efficiently and without burdening the jurys time.
To the extent Mr. Risen may refuse to answer certain questions posed by defense counsel (who, of
course, are not bound by the limitations placed on the prosecution by the Attorney Generals
authorization), the moot will allow the Court to address any resulting Sixth Amendment issues.
Respectfully submitted,
Jack Smith
Chief
Dana J. Boente
United States Attorney
Eric G. Olshan
Deputy Chief
Public Integrity Section
U.S. Department of Justice
James L. Trump
Senior Litigation Counsel
Dennis Fitzpatrick
Assistant United States Attorney
Eastern District of Virginia
By
/s/
James L. Trump
Attorney for the United States of America
United States Attorneys Office
2100 Jamieson Avenue
Alexandria, Virginia 22314
(703) 299-3726
(703) 837-8242 (fax)
jim.trump@usdoj.gov
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on December 16, 2014, I caused an electronic copy of the foregoing
to be filed and served via ECF on Edward B. MacMahon, Jr., and Barry J. Pollack, counsel for
the defendant, and David Kelley and Joel Kurtzberg, counsel for James Risen.
By
/s/
James L. Trump
Attorney for the United States of America
United States Attorneys Office
2100 Jamieson Avenue
Alexandria, Virginia 22314
(703) 299-3726
(703) 837-8242 (fax)
jim.trump@usdoj.gov