COLLECTOR VS CAMPOS RUEDA

In January 1955, Maria Cerdeira died in Tangier, Morocco (an international zone [foreign country]
in North Africa). At thetime of her death, she was a Spanish citizen and was a resident of Tangier. She
however left some personal properties (shares of stocks and other intangibles) in the Philippines. The
designated administrator of her estate here is Antonio Campos Rueda.
In the same year, the Collector of Internal Revenue (CIR) assessed the estate for deficiency tax
amounting to about P161k. Campos Rueda refused to pay the assessed tax as he claimed that the estate
is exempt from the payment of said taxes pursuant to section 122 of the Tax Code which provides:
That no tax shall be collected under this Title in respect of intangible personal property (a) if the
decedent at thetime of his death was a resident of a foreign country which at the time of his death did
not impose a transfer tax or death tax of any character in respect of intangible person property of the
Philippines not residing in that foreign country, or (b) if the laws of the foreign country of which the
decedent was a resident at the time of his death allow a similar exemption from transfer taxes or death
taxes of every character in respect of intangible personal property owned by citizens of the Philippines
not residing in that foreign country.
Campos Rueda was able to prove that there is reciprocity between Tangier and the Philippines.
However, the CIR still denied any tax exemption in favor of the estate as it averred that Tangier is not a
state as contemplated by Section 22 of the Tax Code and that the Philippines does not recognize
Tangier as a foreign country.
ISSUE: Whether or not Tangier is a state.
HELD: Yes. For purposes of the Tax Code, Tangier is a foreign country.
A foreign country to be identified as a state must be a politically organized sovereign community
independent of outside control bound by penalties of nationhood, legally supreme within its territory,
acting through a government functioning under a regime of law. The stress is on its being a nation, its
people occupying a definite territory, politically organized, exercising by means of its government its
sovereign will over the individuals within it and maintaining its separate international personality.
Further, the Supreme Court noted that there is already an existing jurisprudence (Collector vs De Lara)
which provides that even a tiny principality, that of Liechtenstein, hardly an international personality in
the sense, did fall under the exempt category provided for in Section 22 of the Tax Code. Thus,
recognition is not necessary. Hence, since it was proven that Tangier provides such exemption to
personal properties of Filipinos found therein so must the Philippines honor the exemption as provided
for by our tax law with respect to the doctrine of reciprocity.