People can prevent rigging

2014-12-17

Our great democracies still tend to think that a stupid man

is more likely to be honest than a clever man, and our politicians take advantage of this
prejudice by pretending to be even more stupid than nature made them.
~ Bertrand Russell

he present Government and its coalition partners are

held in so much suspicion and contempt, the obvious question that is being asked by
every reasonable man and woman today is: even if we win, will they allow our
candidate to be declared the winner? It is a very reasonable question to ask and
equally reasonable to prepare the voter, supporter and activist of the Opposition for
the uphill task of upholding the law of the land to compel all officials, from the
Elections Department to the Police to be fair and balanced when dealing with the
intricate process of balloting, counting and declaration of the winner - the new
President.
When undertaking any task whether big or small, being ready has no substitute.
Hoping for the best and preparing for the worst is a very reasonable demand from any
new recruit. When talking about elections, what appears most significant in the
process is, other than campaigning itself, actual voting and counting. And when people
refer to their suspicions and doubts, they are in fact referring to polling and counting.
Ever since Independence, almost all our elections, whether they were General,
Presidential or By Elections, have been marred by rigging, some minor and others
bordering on outright and unbelievably mass-scale frauds committed in broad daylight
with regard to polling and by nightly manoeuvres, especially initiated by the current

regime.
In such a continuing and degenerating electioneering process, it is nothing but natural
that the voters question its legitimacy and validity. In such a context, what can the
Opposition do? The passage of the Eighteenth Amendment has given the Executive
almost unbridled powers to control the process. The Commissioner General of
Elections is yet to prove that he has some backbone; being called a General without
the necessary stamina and guts to ensure the sure and safe execution of his duties is a
shameful badge to ornament his civil uniform. A breakdown in the election process,
unrestricted freedom allowed to the incumbent and harassing the opponents and
violating their fundamental rights would eventually end up in a total breakdown of our
society.
"Marcos never ceased to maintain that he was the duly elected and proclaimed
president of the Philippines for a fourth term, but unfairly and illegally deprived of his
right to serve it. On February 25, 1986, rival presidential inaugurations were held. The
rest, as they say, is history. Only the people can prevent any type of large-scale
rigging"
Leaving the country to be run by one single family, its cohorts and henchmen and
incompetent and spiritless bureaucrats would indeed be a national calamity. If the past
five years are of any measure and if the way in which the incumbent has been
conducting affairs of government is any yardstick, it is not so difficult to predict what
would follow if the Rajapaksas are re-elected this time. The manner in which his
henchmen have been shamelessly executing government decisions and the way in
which the infamous Bodu Bala Sena and its chief spokespersons shameless expression
of un-endorsing endorsement of the Rajapaksa candidacy being uttered leaves the
reasonable voter bewildered and stunned. Yet, all seem to agree that, on paper, this
election is Maithripalas to lose. But elections are not fought and lost or won on paper.
The gruelling campaigns that test the will and doggedness of the candidates, might
eventually catch up with amateurs getting bogged down while taking the determined to
the winning post. We are already into the second week of the campaign.
While both candidates are whistling across the countrys electoral map, their respective
support groups are equally busy crafting and releasing propaganda material.
The voter is yet waiting; some with hope that the time has come for a change while
others have opted to remain hoodwinked by the Goebbels-like false propaganda of the
Rajapaksas. On the social media front, the Rajapaksas are being clobbered, almost
90% to 10% in favour of Maithripala Sirisena. But Maithripala-supporters must realize
that the domain of the computer is not restricted to Sri Lanka.
In the global marketplace where those who have no vote in Sri Lanka too are

participating in computer polls. Those results dont mean a thing. No identifiable

company or entity has released any local poll results. But Im sure both parties would
have done their own internal polling and the results used to refine and fine-tune their
respective political strategies and tactics.
But the most pressing question that dominates, not only the Colombo-based
conversation but also the day-to-day exchange of opinions and ideas in the rural
hamlets in the country is whether the election would be rigged by the powers that be.
No strategy, tactic or electioneering engineering could wipe out rigging one hundred
percent. One must provide for a fairly small percentage of rigging, both at the polling
stations and counting centres. But the peoples nagging question whether the declared
result would differ from the actual vote is a very serious phenomenon and cannot be
swept away as insignificant. Such a lingering thought that the Rajapaksas would
remain in power despite a defeat at the elections should be quelled at its birth itself.
Such negative thought processes must be countered only by assuring the voter that it
wouldnt be so.
"But the most pressing question that dominates, not only the Colombo-based
conversation but also the day-to-day exchange of opinions and ideas in the rural
hamlets is whether the election would be rigged by the powers that be"
How can the Opposition do this? As at now, when one looks into the constituent
Opposition political parties that are engaged in the campaign, the efforts of the Jathika
Hela Urumaya (JHU) stand out, eclipsing even those of the United National Party
(UNP). The general lethargy and complacency that had had a killing effect on its
advance during the last twenty years seems to be still continuing. However, thanks
mainly to the appointment of Kabir Hashim as the new General Secretary of the UNP,
the dilemma that most UNP MPs and organizers suffered during the last two decades
should gradually evaporate. Both the UNP and JHU, unlike the Janatha Vimukthi
Peramuna (JVP), are open political parties.
People can join and leave these parties at will and strict codes of discipline which were
the usual character of left-leaning political parties, especially of the JVP are absent.
The UNP and the JHU can very well afford to discuss their policies and to some extent,
even their execution strategies with their membership and support groups openly. Yet
what is required to counter the fear that the people express as regards the honesty of
the electioneering process from polling to counting and declaring the results are the
measures adopted to counterbalance the anticipated rigging and forgeries. All
measures must be in place to get the voter to the polling booth.
If that happens and in the event the counting process could be assessed and monitored
fairly scrupulously, the only hitch would be the actual declaration of the ultimate

result. This is where, I hasten to remind the reader of the post-election episodes in the
Philippines. The elections in the Philippines were held on February 7, 1986.The official
election canvasser, the Commission on Elections (COMELEC), declared Marcos the
winner. The final tally of the COMELEC had Marcos winning with 10,807,197 votes
against Aquinos 9,291,761 votes. On the other hand, the final tally of the National
Movement for Free Elections (NAMFREL), an accredited poll watcher, had Aquino
winning with 7,835,070 votes against Marcos 7,053,068 points. Cheating was
reported on both sides.This electoral exercise was marred by widespread reports of
violence and tampering of election results.
The failed election process gave a decisive boost to the People Power movement. At
the height of the revolution, Juan Ponce Enrile revealed that a purported and wellpublicized ambush attempt against him years earlier was in fact faked for Marcos to
have a pretext for imposing martial law.
However, Marcos never ceased to maintain that he was the duly elected and
proclaimed president of the Philippines for a fourth term, but unfairly and illegally
deprived of his right to serve it. On February 25, 1986, rival presidential inaugurations
were held. The rest, as they say, is history. Only the people can prevent any type of
large-scale rigging.
Posted by Thavam