Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Western
Lands
Project
P.O. Box 95545
Seattle, WA 98145-2545
(206) 325-3503
westernlands.org
In This Issue:
3
5
8
The Relevancy of
Wilderness
ust a few weeks ago, I attended a conference in Albuquerque marking the 50th anniversary of the Wilderness Act, the
law that created the National Wilderness Preservation System.
The conference provided a much-needed opportunity to celebrate
Wilderness a designation affording public lands the highest level
of protection currently available under our laws. It was also a time
to contemplate challenges to Wilderness, whether physical, climatic,
political, or philosophical. The latter two provide contexts for major
debates around Wilderness these days.
One is the debate by now familiar to our readers regarding the
quid pro quo land deals lately engineered by some of the national
environmental groups, securing Wilderness designation in one place by
agreeing to privatization or development of other public lands. I spoke
at the conference on this issue in a presentation entitled Quid Pro
Quo Legislation and the Devolution of Wilderness, which you can
read on our website at http://westernlands.org/publications/papers.
Yet there is another debate roiling around Wilderness that has
broader and more chilling implications: one that questions the relevancy of Wilderness, given the impact that humans have had on global
systems in the current epoch, which the questioners have taken to calling the Anthropocene.
One of the leaders of what might be called the neo-environmentalists is Peter Kareiva, Chief Scientist of The Nature Conservancy,
which is the richest and possibly least-conservationist organization
with such a name. Kareivas basic premise is that nature is not fragile and in need of protection, but resilient and in need of more human management. Another adherent, Emma Marris, is the author of
Rambunctious Garden: Saving Nature in a Post-Wild World and says,
Continued on page 2
Western Lands Update The Newsletter of the Western Lands Project http://westernlands.org
Wilderness
From page 1
as one blogger summarizes: that wilderness is gone forever; we should all get used
to the idea of the environment as humanconstructed; and that this is potentially a
good thing. The neos like market-based
approaches, technology, and placing
humans at the center of any action we
take with regard to nature. They point out
that their movement is optimistic which
in a strange way makes sense, given their
Winter 2014
Vol. 18 # 2
f you have been reading Western Lands Update for a while, you will have seen a
lot of news about Utah, beginning with an article back in 2000 highlighting two big
land exchanges brokered by former Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt both widely
perceived to have ripped off American taxpayers and lavishly gifted the State of Utah.
Weve followed many more Utah deals since then, from a small but harmful land trade
between the Manti-La Sal National Forest and a power company, to land exchanges in
southwest Utah implemented with appraisals manipulated to benefit private landowners,
to the ill-fated, multimillion-dollar congressional rip-off that would have constituted the
San Rafael Swell land exchange.
Utah is among the states with the high- an existing or proposed Wilderness area.
est percentages of federal land within their The Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance
borders, at around 60 percent, and these
asserts that most of the so-called roads the
lands have long been the subject of intense local governments are claiming are stream
disputes and frantic land-dealing.
bottoms, cowpaths and two-tracks in the
At issue:
desert that may have been briefly used de Utahs Schools and Institutional Trust cades ago by ranchers or prospectors and
Lands Administration (SITLA) oversees
only occasionally visited since.
lands granted by the federal government at Like rural areas all over the West,
Utahs counties bemoan the amount of
statehood to fund schools; these are interpublic land within their borders and the
mingled with federal lands (there are four
lack of tax revenue from those lands. Alschool sections per 36-section township:
see diagram on this page) and the State has though their economies benefit by recreation and tourism associated with public
made repeated attempts over the years
land, they consistently call for more direct
some successful to put together massive
control over federal land and more intenland trades that would let them trade their
sive development. Utah is a center of the
school sections for public land containing
oil and gas, minerals, or other development western movement to return federal land
to the states.
potential.
In 1866, Congress passed R
evised
At just one percent of its lands area,
Statute 2477 (RS 2477) to encourage the
Utah has the least amount of designated
settlement of the West through development of highways. The Statute granted a
right-of-way across federal land to counties and states when a highway was built.
RS 2477 was repealed in 1976 when the
Federal Land Management & Policy Act
(FLPMA) was passed, though the Act preserved valid rights that were in e xistence at
the time of the repeal. In the last few years
counties and the State have attempted
to claim rights-of-way on public lands,
particularly in Wilderness. Because Wilderness areas must be at least 5,000 acres
in size and cannot contain roads, a valid
road claim under RS 2477 could disqualify
Winter 2014
Vol. 18# 2
Utah
From page 3
Winter 2014
Vol. 18 # 2
land agencies and the State of Utah; conveyances of federal land to the county;
the opening of ATV routes; a settlement
of RS2477 disputes; designation of Wild
& Scenic Rivers; Wilderness designations,
and establishment of a National Conservation Area. It is difficult at this stage to
know how legislating these actions will
comport with environmental laws, but
it appears that the land exchanges would
override Forest Service and BLM landuse plans already in place that have been
vetted through the public and that would
constitute waivers of the Federal Land
Management & Policy Act and the National Forest Management Act.
One news article about the proposal
stated that Bishop is urging preservationaverse county officials to view wilderness
designations as currency that could
be traded for tangible benefits such as
Winter 2014
Continued on page 6
Vol. 18# 2
Big Solar
From page 5
appeal the decision but has not yet announced whether it will do so.
Update on Ivanpah
The Ivanpah Solar plant first to be fasttracked through the permitting process and
first to go online in the Obama Administration has been in the news fairly constantly
since it began operations in December 2013,
and the news has not been good.
(1) News originally broken by our
colleague Chris Clarke was later taken up
by the Associated Press solar plants kill
birds. In his ReWire blog at KCET.org,
Chris revealed dangers to birds posed by
the solar flux emanating between Ivanpahs fields of mirrors and power towers
birds were being incinerated after being attracted into the plant area either by
Winter 2014
Vol. 18 # 2
Sheryl.
Winter 2014
Vol. 18# 2
issue; whether and how much solar development is appropriate in the planning area;
and the need to preserve habitat.
Winter 2014
Vol. 18 # 2
Rebecca Haseleu
Darrell Howe
Dave Kaiser and Kristin
Temperly*
James Keating
Steve Kelly
Carole K. Klein
Chris Krupp*
Joseph D. Krupp
Kurt and Karen Largent
Joseph Lee and Susan
Eisner
Sandy Lonsdale
Mike Maloney*
Brandt Mannchen
Fran Mauer
Rick McGuire
John Middleton
Rich Nelson and Rebecca
Hilliker
Andrew Nelson
George Nickas
Giancarlo Panagia
Deborah Paulson
Sandra Perkins and Jeffrey
Ochsner
Scott Phillips
David Reagan
Anne Rickenbaugh
Prof. Bill Rodgers
Paul Rogland
Erica Rosenberg and Dan
Sarewitz
Dr. Justin Schmidt
Mary Ann Schroeder
Michael W. Shurgot
Richard Spudich
Sheryl Stich
Rose Strickland
Janet Torline
David Vassar and Sally
Kaplan
Wade and Shirley Vaughn
Sally Vogel
Cathy Weeden*
Terry Weiner
Jane Whalen
Nat and Jean White
Steve Wolper*
Guy Yogi
*Monthly donors
Foundation Support:
AmazonSmile
Foundation
Anonymous Foundation
Conservation and
Research Foundation
David M. Gladstone and
Melinda G. Gladstone
Foundation
Deer Creek Foundation
Firedoll Foundation
Kuehlthau Family
Foundation
Leiter Family Foundation
New-Land Foundation
The Maki Foundation
The White Pine Fund
Weeden Foundation
The donations and grants shown were received between June 13, 2014 and December
2, 2014. If your gift was received after this date, youll be acknowledged in our next
newsletter. Thank you for your support we could not do this work without you!
Did you know that you can help support Western Lands Project by shopping
at Amazon? Through their AmazonSmile Foundation, Amazon will donate
0.5% of all eligible purchases to the nonprofit of your choice and we are on
the list! Visit smile.amazon.com to learn more and register.
Winter 2014
Vol. 18# 2
NON-PROFIT
ORG
US Postage
PAID
SEATTLE WA
Permit # 1445
Board of Directors
Name:
Address:
City:
Staff
Janine Blaeloch, Director
blaeloch@westernlands.org
Christopher Krupp, Staff Attorney
krupp@westernlands.org
Sheryl Stich, Development Manager
stich@westernlands.org
State: Zip:
Phone: Fax:
regular $35
contributing $125
Email: