Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
16431657
Abstract
The present paper has shown that the Q concept, as proposed by P.W.J.M. Boumans, J.J.A.M. Vrakking,
Spectrochim. Acta Part B 43 1988. 69, can be used as a basic methodology in the determination of Ba, Cr, Cd, Mn,
Pb and Zn in pairs of atmospheric particles by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry ICP-AES..
The data base of Q values for line interference w Q I j a.x and Q values for wing background interference w QWJ a.x
were obtained in our former work wN. Daskalova, Iv. Boevski, Spectral interferences in the determination of trace
elements in environmental materials by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry, Spectrochim. Acta
rtB 54 1999. 10991122x. The samples of atmospheric particles were collected by the Bergerhoff method. The
ICP-AES determination was performed after sample digestion with aqua regia. Q values were used for the
calculation of both the total interfering signal under the analysis lines and the true detection limits, depending on the
matrix constituents in the different samples. Comparative data for the concentration of analytes were obtained by
flame atomic absorption spectrometry FAAS. and direct current arc atomic emission spectrographic method dc
arc-AES.. 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: ICP-AES; Q-concept; Atmospheric particulate matter; Trace elements; Correction procedure; True
detection limits
1644
I . Boe ski et al. r Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 55 (2000) 16431657
1. Introduction
At present at least, accurate analysis of environmental materials other then natural or waste
waters requires dissolution of the samples. There
are a large number of possible objectives for this
type of analysis, including verification that a
material is legally defined as hazardous waste:
soils, sediments, sludges, atmospheric particulate
matter, mine tailing, industrial wastes, etc. The
most commonly used procedure for this analysis
is to solubilize the samples in question using an
acid digestion procedure and analyze the resulting liquid digestate by flame atomic absorption
spectrometry FAAS., electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry ETAAS., inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry ICPAES. or inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry ICP-MS.. Less common techniques such
as glow discharge and laser-induced breakdown
spectrometry have been used in the analysis of
gaseous species w16x
Instrumental methods are used to monitor airborne particulates outdoors w6x and in industrial
workplaces to safeguard occupational health w79x.
The coarse atmospheric aerosol fraction particles with aerodynamic diameter above 100 m.
determines dry sedimentation. The routes of this
type of aerosol exposure may involve skin deposition, the food chain after deposition on soils,
waters, plants, etc.. and inhalation w8x. The nature
and magnitude of the hazards in a given situation
depend on a complex combination of many factors, including particle size distribution, windspeed range, airborne concentration, particle
morphology, mineralogy and chemical composition. The chemical analysis of atmospheric particles is of great interest in order to estimate the
source and trend of atmospheric pollution. The
content of toxic pollutants of atmospheric particles is of interest for industrial hygiene chemistry.
The main functions of industrial hygiene chemistry are screening for chemical stressors during
the recognition phase and monitoring of specific
hazard concentrations during the evaluation w10x.
The application of the ICP-AES to air quality
2. Experimental
2.1. Instrumentation
The Jobin Yvon Longjumeau, France. equipment and the operating conditions used in the
ICP-AES experiments are specified in Table 1.
The FAAS measurements were performed with
Pye Unicam SP 192 spectrometer, using the most
sensitive lines of the elements under the operat-
I . Boe ski et al. r Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 55 (2000) 16431657
1645
Table 1
Specification of the spectrometer, ICP source and operating conditions
Monochromator
Mounting
Grating
Wavelength range
Dispersion
Entrance slit
Exit slit
Resultant spectral slit
Practical spectral band width
Photomultiplier
Rf generator
Frequency
Oscillator
Power output
Nebulizer
Pump
Operating conditions
Incident powerrkW
Outer argon flow raterl miny1 .
Carrier flow raterl miny 1 .
Liquid uptake raterml miny1 .
Nebulizer pressure flowrlbf iny2 .
Transport efficiency of ICP systemr%
Excitation temperature
of ICP plasmarK
1.0
15
0.4
1.3
20 1.38 bar.
3
7200
2.2. Reagents
2.4. Digestion procedure
Reagents of the highest purity grade were used:
30% HCl Suprapur, Merck.; 65% HNO 3
Suprapur, Merck.; and tridistilled water from a
quartz apparatus. Stock solutions of the analyte 1
mg mly1 . were prepared from Merck Titrisols.
PTFE ware was used throughout.
2.3. Sampling
The samples were collected by Bergerhoffs
1646
I . Boe ski et al. r Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 55 (2000) 16431657
Table 2
Specification of the spectrograph, dc power generator and operating conditions
Spectrograph
Grating
Registered spectrum
Illumination system
Slit width
Hartmanns diaphragms
D.C. power generator
Operating conditions
Current
Exposure time
Electrodes
Electrode shape
Electrode spacing
Amount of sample
Spectral plates
Wavelength of analysis
Prominent lines
tion vessel and connected with the reflux condenser. Both apparatus were placed on the top of
the reaction vessel and the sample was allowed to
stand for 16 h at room temperature for slow
oxidation of the organic matter and reduction of
the gases produced during the subsequent heating
cycle. They were heated under reflux until boiling
for 2 h and allowed to cool slowly at room temperature. The contents and the subsequent rinses
of the absorption vessel were passed through the
condenser into the reaction vessel. The content of
the reaction vessel was transferred quantitatively
to a 25-ml graduated flask and filled up to the
mark with 0.5 mol ly1 HNO3 . After the undissolved material had settled, the supernatant solution was subjected to analysis by ICP-AES or
FAAS. A blank sample containing the acids used
for digestion was prepared in the same way
All glass and plastic ware were kept in 10% vrv
HNO3 for at least one night and then rinsed with
1% vrv HNO3 , and subsequently with distilled
water before use.
I . Boe ski et al. r Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 55 (2000) 16431657
1647
1.
2.
3.
where R.S.D.Bs 1% is the relative standard deviation of the background; and BEC is the background equivalent concentration in g mly1 ..
3.1.2. Analysis of samples of atmospheric particulate
matter
Four samples of atmospheric particles were
collected by the Bergerhoff method from separate
spots around a metallurgical company Section
2.3..
1648
I . Boe ski et al. r Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 55 (2000) 16431657
Table 3
Values of QW a . and Q I a . for prominent lines of Ba, Cd, Cr, Mn, Pb and Zna
Analysis lines
pm.
Interferents
QW a .
QI a .
Ba II 455 404
Al
Ca
Fe
Mg
Ti
0
9.0= 10I6
0
4.5= 10I5
2.6= 10I6
0
0
0
0
0
Ba II 493 409
Al
Ca
Fe
Mg
Ti
2.0= 10y6
7.4= 10y6
5.0= 10y7
4.0= 10y7
3.3= 10y6
0
0
4.0= 10y5
0
0
Ba II 233 527
Al
Ca
Fe
Mg
Ti
2.6= 10y6
5.2= 10y5
5.6= 10y5
1.7= 10y5
4.4= 10y5
0
0
6.1= 10y5
0
0
Ba II 230 424
Al
Ca
Fe
Mg
Ti
0
7.2= 10y5
2.9= 10y5
2.3= 10y5
5.0= 10y5
0
0
4.1 = 10y5
0
0
Cd II 214 438
Al
Ca
Fe
Mg
Ti
0
1.3= 10I4
6.0= 10I4
0
8.5= 10I4
0
0
0
0
0
Cd I 228 802
Al
Ca
Fe
Mg
Ti
6.6= 10y5
7.0= 10y4
6.3= 10y4
4.8= 10y4
4.7= 10y4
0
0
0
0
0
Cd II 226 502
Al
Ca
Fe
Mg
Ti
6.0= 10y6
4.0= 10y4
9.1= 10y5
4.7= 10y4
7.0= 10y4
5.7= 10y5
0
0
0
0
Cr II 205 552
Al
Ca
Fe
Mg
Ti
3.4= 10y4
3.6= 10y4
7.0= 10y5
2.5= 10y4
2.0= 10y4
0
0
1.1= 10y4
0
0
I . Boe ski et al. r Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 55 (2000) 16431657
Table 3 Continued.
Analysis lines
pm.
Interferents
QW a .
QI a .
Cr II 206 149
Al
Ca
Fe
Mg
Ti
0
4.2= 10y4
2.2= 10y4
3.2= 10y4
1.9= 10y4
0
0
0
0
1.8= 10y4
Cr II 267 716
Al
Ca
Fe
Mg
Ti
0
1.2= 10I5
6.7= 10I5
3.7= 10I5
1.2= 10I5
0
0
0
0
2.7= 10I5
Cr II 283 563
Al
Ca
Fe
Mg
Ti
0
2.8= 10y6
5.7= 10y6
1.3= 10y4
0
0
0
1.0= 10y3
0
2.7= 10y5
Mn II 257 610
Al
Ca
Fe
Mg
Ti
4.7= 10I6
5.5= 10I6
1.1= 10I5
9.5= 10I6
4.7= 10I6
0
0
0
0
0
Mn II 259 373
Al
Ca
Fe
Mg
Ti
0
4.7= 10y6
1.7= 10y5
8.8= 10y6
3.5=10y6
0
0
6.9= 10y40
Pb II 220 353
Al
Ca
Fe
Mg
Ti
9.7= 10I4
5.3= 10I4
4.1= 10I4
4.5= 10I4
5.2= 10I4
4.0= 10I4
0
0
0
5.510I5
Pb I 216 999
Al
Ca
Fe
Mg
Ti
2.8= 10y3
2.1= 10y3
6.9= 10y4
1.7= 10y3
1.3= 10y3
4.0= 10y3
0
1.0= 10y3
0
0
Pb I 261 418
Al
Ca
Fe
Mg
Ti
9.1= 10y5
4.1= 10y4
6.3= 10y3
3.2= 10y4
2.8= 10y4
0
0
1.1= 10y2
0
1.4= 10y4
3.7= 10y5
1649
1650
I . Boe ski et al. r Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 55 (2000) 16431657
Table 3 Continued.
Analysis lines
pm.
Interferents
QW a .
QI a .
Pb I 283 306
Al
Ca
Fe
Mg
Ti
0
3.5= 10y4
0
3.8= 10y3
3.3= 10y4
0
0
3.6= 10y3
0
5.3= 10y4
Zn I 213 856
Al
Ca
Fe
Mg
Ti
4.1= 10y5
2.7= 10y5
0
0
1.7= 10y5
0
0
1.1= 10y4
0
3.0= 10y5
Zn II 202 548
Al
Ca
Fe
Mg
Ti
1.4= 10y4
2.2= 10y4
9.8= 10y5
3.1= 10y4
1.2= 10y4
0
0
0
4.0= 10y4
0
Zn II 206 200
Al
Ca
Fe
Mg
Ti
3.0= 10I4
1.8= 10I4
7.4= 10I5
1.5= 10I4
1.1= 10I4
0
0
0
0
0
Interferents: aluminium 2 mg mly1 ., calcium 2 mg mly1 ., iron 2 mg mly1 ., magnesium 2 mg mly1 . and titanium 2 mg
ml .
a
y1 .
I . Boe ski et al. r Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 55 (2000) 16431657
1651
Table 4
Interferent concentrations C I J for which Q I J a . s 0 for aluminium, iron and titanium as a matrix elements
Analysis lines
pm.
Interferent concentrations CI J , g ml y 1
for which QI J a . s 0
Aluminium
Iron
Titanium
Ba II 455 403
Ba II 493 409
Ba II 233 527
Ba II 230 424
20
70
140
Cd II 214 438
Cd I 228 802
Cd II 226 502
Cr II 205 552
Cr II 206 149
100
120
120
Cr II 267 716
Cr II 283 563
710
200
260
Mn II 257 610
Mn II 259 373
35
Pb II 220 353
Pb I 216 999
Pb I 261 418
Pb I 283 306
125
40
150
20
60
900
1300
4100
Zn I 213 856
Zn II 202 548
Zn II 206 200
50
150
1652
I . Boe ski et al. r Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 55 (2000) 16431657
Analysis lines
pm.
BEC g mly1 .
CLng mly1 .
Ba II 455 403
Ba II 493 409
Ba II 233 527
Ba II 230 424
0.02
0.03
0.14
0.20
0.65
0.79
4
5.7
Cd II 214 438
Cd I 228 802
Cd II 226 502
0.30
0.20
0.20
8.3
5.7
5.7
Cr II 205 552
Cr II 206 149
Cr II 267 716
Cr II 283 563
0.40
0.70
0.20
0.25
12
21
5.7
7.1
Mn II 257 610
Mn II 259 373
0.04
0.04
1.2
1.2
Pb II 220 353
Pb I 216 999
Pb I 261 418
Pb I 283 306
1.30
5.00
6.30
7.60
Zn I 213 856
Zn II 202 548
Zn II 206 200
0.16
0.30
0.40
37
140
180
216
4.5
8.5
12
I . Boe ski et al. r Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 55 (2000) 16431657
1653
1. By using the best analysis line, the concentrations of Cd in samples 1 and 2 were in the
vicinity of the detection limit concentration
levels and could be determined with a desired
level of precision.
2. In most cases, the analyte concentration determined by the best analysis lines substantially exceeded the detection limits Tables 8
and 9.. When the analyte concentration substantially exceeded the detection limits as in
the case of Ba, Cr, Mn, Pb and Zn. the use of
a second analysis lines with Q I J s 0 was justified. In such cases the equation Q I J = CI J s
CL was used. The interferent concentration
CI J for which Q I J s 0 Table 4. and the dilution factor of the sample solution were determined. When necessary, more than two
analysis lines could be used for improving the
Table 6
Content of Al, Ca, Mg, Fe and Ti in solution g mly1 . derived after dissolution of the different samples a
Analysis
lines,
pm.
Concentrations g mly1 .
Sample 1
Xi
Al I 237 324
Sample 2
X
Xi
204
200
Ca I 422 673
1120
1110
Mg II 279 806
150
Mg II 285 213
146
Fe II 238 204
980
Fe II 239 562
Ti II 334 941
Ti II 336 121
a
6.0
615
620
6.5
5.5
5.6
610
1275
1270
5.4
103
106
1280
1046
5.9
100
169
166
1042
1051
1054
172
1050
5.8
1048
1249
161
162
183
186
1248
160
1000
180
1250
1049
1053
265
270
1045
990
Xi
260
218
148
Sample 4
X
219
1115
Ca II 315 887
Xi
220
202
Al I 394 401
Sample 3
5.0
6.6
6.7
4.8
4.6
Notes: X i is the mean of three replicates by using a given analysis line; X is the mean values of two concentrations, obtained by
using two analysis lines of each analyte.
1654
I . Boe ski et al. r Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 55 (2000) 16431657
Table 7
The background equivalent concentration for line interference wBEC I J , g mly1 x column 2., background equivalent concentration
for wing background interference wBEC W J , g mly1 x column 3. and total background signal at the peak wavelength a wBEC Total,
g mly1 x column 4. for the best analysis lines
The best
analysis lines
pm.
Sample
No
J BECI J ,
g mly1
J BECW J ,
g mly1
BECTotal ,
g mly1
Ba II 455 403
1
2
3
4
0
0
0
0
0.017
0.017
0.019
0.014
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.24
Cd II 214 438
1
2
3
4
0
0
0
0
0.75
0.78
0.94
0.51
1.05
1.08
1.24
0.81
Cr II 267 716
1
2
3
4
0
0
0
0
0.120
0.12
0.15
0.09
0.37
0.37
0.40
0.34
Mn II 257 610
1
2
3
4
0
0
0
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.02
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.06
Pb II 220 353
1
2
3
4
0.08
0.09
0.11
0.07
1.27
1.28
1.52
1.04
2.65
2.67
2.93
2.4
Zn II 206 200
1
2
3
4
0
0
0
0
0.36
0.34
0.43
0.30
0. 76
0.74
0.83
0.70
tion for, various spectroscopic interferences encountered in the determination of Ba, Cd, Cr,
Mn, Pb and Zn in atmospheric particulate matter
has been shown in Section 3.1. Comparative data
for the concentration of above-mentioned analytes were obtained by FAAS as an alternative
method for the analysis of the same sample solutions Table 8, column 2..
3.3. dc Arc-AES method
The dc arc-AES method for the analysis of
solid samples of atmospheric particulate matter
was used. The specification of the spectrograph,
I . Boe ski et al. r Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 55 (2000) 16431657
Table 8
Element determination in couples of atmospheric particulate
matter mean of three replicates.
Sample Element Concentrations, g gy1
No
ICP-AES
FAAS
dc Arc-AES
1.
Ba
Cd
Cr
Mn
Pb
Zn
695 " 10
1.52" 0.05
250 " 5
355 " 8
165 " 5
495 " 10
707 " 10
1.53" 0.05
242 " 5
356 " 6
176 " 5
495 " 10
690 " 25
1.58" 0.1
245 " 20
360 " 15
169 " 10
510 " 25
2.
Ba
Cd
Cr
Mn
Pb
Zn
2000 " 5
2.15" 0.05
475 " 10
1800 " 6
265 " 5
715 " 8
2010 " 5
2.16" 0.05
470 " 10
1805 " 5
270 " 5
710 " 6
2025 " 20
2.18" 0.1
465 " 20
1810 " 20
275 " 20
698 " 25
3.
Ba
Cd
Cr
Mn
Pb
Zn
2148 " 5
33.0" 0.05
85.0" 5
790 " 5
288 " 5
1280 " 5
2152 " 5
32.5" 0.05
88.0" 5
790 " 5
285 " 5
1285 " 5
2150 " 20
34.0" 0.1
84.0" 10
788 " 15
282 " 10
1278 " 15
4.
Ba
Cd
Cr
Mn
Pb
Zn
1600 " 5
8.70" 0.05
138 " 5
385 " 5
176 " 5
1170 " 5
1605 " 5
8.68" 0.05
138 " 5
390 " 5
178 " 5
1165 " 5
1598 " 15
8.65" 0.1
140 " 10
383 " 10
170 " 10
1162 " 12
3.4. Conclusion
1655
Acknowledgements
Thanks are due to the National Found Scientific Research of the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology of Bulgaria for financial
support of this work under registration N X-544.
1656
I . Boe ski et al. r Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 55 (2000) 16431657
Table 9
Conventional detection limits ng mly1 . and the same detection limits with respect to the dissolved solid in g gy1 .
CL, conv.
ng mly1 .
CL,conv.
g gy1 .
Sample
No
Best analysis
lines, pm
1.
2.
3.
4.
Ba II 455 403
7.0
7.0
7.0
7.0
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
1.
2.
3.
4.
Cd II 214 438
30.0
31.0
35.0
23.0
1.50
1.55
1.75
1.15
1.
2.
3.
4.
Cr II 267 716
10.5
10.5
11.3
9.6
0.53
0.53
0.57
0.48
1.
2.
3.
4.
Mn II 257 610
1.7
2.3
2.8
1.7
0.09
0.10
0.14
0.09
1.
2.
3.
4.
Pb II 220 353
75.0
75.0
83. 0
68. 0
3.75
3.78
4.15
3.40
1.
2.
3.
4.
Zn II 202 548
19.0
19.0
21.0
17.5
0.95
0.95
1.10
0.88
References
w1x M.S. Cresser, L.M. Garden, J. Armstrong, J.R. Dean, P.
Watkins, M. Cave, Atomic spectrometry update environmental analysis, J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 11 1996.
19R85R.
w2x J.R. Dean, L.M. Garden, J. Armstrong, M.S. Cresser, M.
Cave, P. Watkin, Atomic spectrometry update environmental analysis, J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 12 1997.
19R88R.
w3x J.R. Dean, O. Butler, A. Fisher, L.M. Garden, M.S.
Cresser, P. Watkins, M. Cave, Atomic spectrometry update environmental analysis, J. Anal. At. Spectrom.
13 1998. 1R56R.
w4x M.R. Cave, O. Butler, J.M. Cook, M.S. Cresser, L.M.
Garden, A.J. Holden, D.L. Miles, Atomic spectrometry
update environmental analysis, J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 14 1999. 279352.
I . Boe ski et al. r Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 55 (2000) 16431657
w12x
w13x
w14x
w15x
w16x
1657