Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Home About UPSR Materials KSSR Materials Links Conferences & Events
Research & Publications
Thursday, October 13, 2011
Popular Posts
My Favourite
English Week
Activities
Question
Papers for
2nd
Semester
Exam (Level
1) Downloads
KSSR and
the Modular
Approach
'I would
choose...'
(Part 1:
Extracting
the Juice)
'Singing the
Structure' Using Simple
Melodies to
Teach
Sentence
Construction
Modules for UPSR Paper 2,
Section B
http://cindyjbj79.blogspot.com/2011/10/kssr-and-modular-approach.html
1/10
11/5/2014
Teaching
Sentence
Construction
to my Rural
Kids
'Unity in
Diversity' The Story
Retold
I don't have
what it takes
to be a
teacher
Five
Scaffolding
Activities for
Sentence
Construction
Doodles on My Sketchpad
Events and
Activities IATEFL 2014
Books
Linguistics
Modular
My Story
My
Two
Cents
Phonics
Random Resources and
Materials Sabah and Sabahans
Approach
Scaffolded
Snippets
Everywhere
Grammar
Ideas
Strategy
from
Teaching
Teaching
Teaching
Opinion
Teaching Writing
UPSR Useful Teaching
Info Working with Parents
Writing
We can see the connection of Definition 1 and Definition 2 with education and KSSR,
and although Definition 3 is directly related to a spacecraft (heheh!), I decided to
include it here because it does have its relevance to KSSR.
'Module' is the noun, and 'modular' is the adjective. Describing something as 'modular'
means referring to it as having separate units that when combined together make a
complete whole. Therefore, we could roughly interpret 'modular approach' in
education as an approach where different units (or skills) taught separately or
individually make up one whole complete curriculum when they are combined
together. Furthermore, using the spaceship analogy, learners subscribed to this
curriculum are also expected to be able to use (or 'operate') the individual skills
('parts') independently of the other skills, even (and especially) when separate from
them.
Blog Archive
Blog Archive
Follow by Email
Email address...
1. one of a set of separate parts which, when combined, form a complete whole;
2. one of the units which together make a complete course taught especially at a college
or university;
3. a part of a spacecraft which can operate independently of the other parts, especially
when separate from them.
Submit
AddThis
In the traditional university system, each subject (course) is stretched over the whole
semester period with usually three lecture hours a week. In the modular course system, in
contrast, each course is usually two days a week for four weeks.
The modular course system makes understanding much easier since it is more intense than
the traditional system of teaching one course over a whole semester.
(http://www.iis.ru.ac.th/iis/modular_course_system.html)
Subscribe To
Posts
Comments
Google+ Followers
YWAM Finland which also adapts the modular education system states some of the
benefits of the modular education system that they apply in their institution:
1. It provides students with intensive and focused time on each topic.
2. It allows mobility for both students and teachers (faculty).
3. It allows for different learning strategy.
(Read more here).
Curriculum Organisation in KSSR
http://cindyjbj79.blogspot.com/2011/10/kssr-and-modular-approach.html
2/10
11/5/2014
Cynthia C. James
So how is the curriculum organised under this new KSSR? According to the official
Standard Document for KSSR published by the Curriculum Development Department
of the Ministry of Education, primary education is divided into two stages: Stage One
refers to Year 1, 2 and 3 and Stage 2 refers to Year 4, 5 and 6. In Year 1 and 2, there
will be four modules:
Add to circles
Module
Module
Module
Module
1:
2:
3:
4:
View
all
Module
Module
Module
Module
Module
1:
2:
3:
4:
5:
Networked Blogs
Followers (100)
Based on the four (for Year 1 and 2) or five (for Year 3 to 6) modules for KSSR
English language, teachers are expected to teach these modules separately and
individually, and in sequence. This differs greatly from KBSR where all the four
language skills of listening, speaking, reading and writing are not expected to be
taught separately. In KBSR, the four language skills should be integrated in a
thematic and topical lesson. Language arts and grammar are incorporated (most of
the time in a covert manner) throughout the curriculum as part of a lesson activity.
On the other hand, in KSSR, teachers are expected to teach the skills separately and
in sequence, starting with Module 1 (Listening and Speaking), then move on to
Module 2 (Reading), then Module 3 (Writing) and Module 4 (Language Arts). For Year
3 onwards, after Module 4 the sequence will continue with Module 5 (Grammar).
According to the KSSR Standard Document, through the modular curriculum, "pupils
will be able to focus on the development of salient language skills or sub-skills under
each module through purposeful activities in meaningful contexts" (KSSR Standard
Document, page 7). The Standard Document itself is quite clear in explaining the
policy on which the modular approach in KSSR is built on, yet it doesn't seem to
hinder questions upon questions being piled on one after another, by teachers and
educators all over, especially those who are directly involved with the dissemination
and implementation of the new curriculum known as KSSR.
KSSR Modular Approach FAQ
As I've stated, questions upon questions have been asked. I think the best way to
discuss this matter would be to list down the frequently-asked questions on KSSR
Modular Approach, and I'll attempt to provide my views on the matter as best I could.
Chat with Me
Question 1:
Under the modular approach, ONE and ONLY ONE skill should be taught in a particular
lesson. There should be no integration of skills. A reading lesson must strictly be a
reading lesson. No other language skills should be involved. TRUE or FALSE?
Answer 1:
I would answer with a big FALSE. To all teachers and JUs (!!!) who have been
advocating the above to other teachers, I would like to humbly invite you to please
refer to KSSR Standard Document page 7: "This modular approach does not exclude
integration of skills. However, skills integration is exploited strategically to enhance
pupils' development of specific language skills as described in the content and
learning standards in a module." If I understand what it means correctly, I believe
the CDD is hoping that the new curriculum that they've designed would manage to
focus and emphasize on one individual language skill only at one time in a particular
lesson. However, it doesn't mean that integration of skills should no longer be
http://cindyjbj79.blogspot.com/2011/10/kssr-and-modular-approach.html
3/10
11/5/2014
eve: hi cynth
19 Oct 14, 02:56 AM
eve: hi cynth....
23 Aug 14, 05:42 PM
e-mail / url
message
Go
help smilies cbox
Teacher Cartoons
DAILY CARTOON
click to enlarge
Cartoon by Andertoons
Longman Dictionary
Search the Dictionary
http://cindyjbj79.blogspot.com/2011/10/kssr-and-modular-approach.html
4/10
11/5/2014
lesson.
Secondly, the Modular Approach in KSSR is not proposed by CDD because 'the old
ways of doing things doesn't seem to work.' Personally, I don't believe this is the
case. Whether learning happens or not does not depend entirely on a particular
approach or system. Learning is influenced by a combination of a variety of factors:
psychological factors, socioeconomic factors, and the 'teacher effect', among others.
I don't have an 'inside knowledge' on why CDD has decided to adopt the Modular
Approach in KSSR, replacing Whole Language. However, after studying a few KSSR
materials and conducting some 'little research' of my own, I've come to these
conclusions:
1. The design of the Modular Approach in KSSR provides a 'scaffolded learning'
experience. Skills should be taught in sequence because the previous skill provides
the scaffolding for the next skill that follows.
2. The Modular Approach in KSSR gives all skills a 'fair chance'. In the former KBSR,
although integration of skills are very much emphasized by the CDD and also the
Nazir, situations such as 'all English lesson is a reading and writing lesson' and 'all
English lesson is a grammar lesson' are very prevalent. Listening and Speaking as
well as Language Arts are almost always forgotten. Why? Because in UPSR, reading
and writing and grammar are the only skills being tested. The Modular Approach in
KSSR is an attempt to rectify that.
3. The Modular Approach in KSSR is an attempt to give all pupils a 'fair chance'.
During the KBSR era, we can see an education system that was so heavily
examination-oriented. Because of that, many teachers fell into the temptation of
teaching what was only needed to pass the examination. Pupils were not given
enough opportunity to truly learn the language, to explore the beauty of it, to enjoy
it. One of the modules included in the KSSR Modular Approach is the Language Arts
module, and when I first learned about that, my first thought was: "Yeay! Finally!"
Although we did have the Children's Contemporary Literature Program in KBSR (which
will still be continued under KSSR, I presume), most of the time teachers wouldn't
spend a lot of time on it with their pupils because the contents are not directly
related to the syllabus content. And although the program is compulsory, many
teachers would just gloss over it because the organisation of the KBSR was such that
teachers were not 'forced' to bring it to the classroom. In the Language Arts module
under KSSR, we could see an attempt to maneuver these whole thing towards the
opposite direction, a positive direction, that is.
So, why must skills be taught in sequence under the Modular Approach? Because it
seems to be the best way of teaching the skills if we want the Modular Approach in
KSSR to work. It isn't because not teaching in sequence is not good or doesn't work,
it is because the Modular Approach in KSSR is designed that way, and it needs to be
conducted that way in order for it to work. And we are not talking about any other
Modular Approach under any curriculum in any other country. We are talking about
the Malaysian KSSR Modular Approach, implemented in Malaysia in 2010.
More on this in my next post.
Question 4:
Wouldn't the modular approach cause problem for our pupils to use language in
context? After all, language is used by combining more than one skills at any one
time. Teaching the skills separately would train the pupils to use the language skills
separately, and they wouldn't know how to use all the skills together in real-life
context.
Answer 4:
As addressed previously in my answer to Question 1, the Modular Approach in KSSR
does not exclude integration of skills. What should happen in Modular Approach in
KSSR is a particular skill being emphasized more, or magnified, compared to other
skills, yet not with the absence of other skills. Would this approach cause problem for
pupils to use language in context? In my humble opinion, that shouldn't be the case.
In addition to "purposeful activities in meaningful context" and "skills integration
exploited strategically", in KSSR, "language input is [also] presented under themes
http://cindyjbj79.blogspot.com/2011/10/kssr-and-modular-approach.html
5/10
11/5/2014
Related Posts :
KSSR
'Look and Say' vs. Phonics - The KSSR 'Debate' (Part 5: Resolving the Debate)
'Look and Say' vs. Phonics - The KSSR 'Debate' (Part 4: The General Concerns)
'Look and Say' vs. Phonics - The KSSR 'Debate' (Part 3: History and Controversy)
'Look and Say' vs. Phonics - The KSSR 'Debate' (Part 2)
'Look and Say' vs. Phonics - The KSSR 'Debate' (Part 1)
Modular Approach
http://cindyjbj79.blogspot.com/2011/10/kssr-and-modular-approach.html
6/10
11/5/2014
funny (0)
interesting (0)
cool (0)
inspiring (0)
helpful (0)
11 comments:
http://cindyjbj79.blogspot.com/2011/10/kssr-and-modular-approach.html
7/10
11/5/2014
Question 3: How can we teach all the 32 sounds as mentioned in the Learning Standard 2.1.1
to complete the Band 1 assessment in Module 1(L&S) before we are able to proceed and
assess in Module 2 ( Reading)? to complete 32 sounds is ridiculous! Again we refer on how to
teach Phonics effectively.
Answer: Left unanswered.
Question 4: Why can't we proceed to assess pupils to the next modular if the first Modular L&S
has not been objectively achieved?
Answer: the trainer told us that we need to follow what has been informed by the MOE.
BUT..... a teacher stood up and argued with the statement by saying; It is not practical. A
language should not be learned or mastered by following sequences. It's because some pupils
might not be good in L&S but they are able to read and comprehend the text.Some pupils
might be good in writing but not able to listen and follow instructions as well as replying to
questions. the teacher says that the pupils should be given a 'fair chance'in assessing them in
the Language.( The Science and math subject is giving the flexibility in assessing the pupils
except for English Language)
Question 5: How do we teach Dictionary skills? In what ways can we use this skill effectively in
the classroom? (Refer Learning Standard 2.2.5)
Answer: Left Unanswered
Regards.
Rose Jean;)
Reply
http://cindyjbj79.blogspot.com/2011/10/kssr-and-modular-approach.html
8/10
11/5/2014
Comment as:
Publish
Google Account
Preview
Older Post
Home
Newer Post
http://cindyjbj79.blogspot.com/2011/10/kssr-and-modular-approach.html
9/10
11/5/2014
http://cindyjbj79.blogspot.com/2011/10/kssr-and-modular-approach.html
10/10