Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
available at www.sciencedirect.com
w w w . i i fi i r . o r g
article info
abstract
Article history:
Ocean thermal energy conversion systems are expected to be the next-generation energy
production systems. In these systems, a plate heat exchanger is used for improving the
19 September 2009
a working fluid.
In this study, boiling heat transfer coefficients of pure ammonia are measured on
a vertical flat PHE (a plate heat exchanger), for elucidating and characterizing the behavior
of ammonia on a compact plate evaporator, a type of PHE
Keywords:
The measurement results show that local boiling heat transfer coefficients increase with
Heat exchanger
increasing vapor quality. Further, the effects of saturation pressure, mass flow rate, and
Plate exchanger
average heat flux on the boiling heat transfer coefficient are elucidated. An empirical
Heat transfer
correlation for the local boiling heat transfer coefficient is derived using the Lockhart-Mar-
Boiling
Ammonia
performed to elucidate the relation between boiling behavior and heat transfer.
Measurement
1.
Introduction
* Corresponding author. Institute of Ocean Energy, Saga University, 849-4256 Japan (IOES). Tel.: 81 955 20 2190; fax: 81 955 20 2191.
E-mail address: arima@ioes.saga-u.ac.jp (H. Arima).
0140-7007/$ see front matter 2009 Elsevier Ltd and IIR. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2009.09.017
360
Nomenclature
A
b
C
C1wC5
Cp
Dh
F
Ffl
G
h
hLZ
n
ifg
ipre,in
ipre,out
isat,l
itest,n
j
k
li
m
Psat
q
Q
T
Twall
DTsat
w
x
constant []
constant []
proportionality factor [(W/m2)(1-n)/K]
constant
specific heat [J/(kg K)]
hydraulic diameter [m] 2wd /(w d)
constant []
fluid-dependent parameter []
mass flux [kg/(m2 s)]
boiling heat transfer coefficient [W/(m2 K)]
heat transfer coefficient for two-phase flow and
for flow of only a liquid phase in a channel
[W/(m2 K)]
constant []
latent heat of vaporization [J/kg]
specific enthalpy of preheater inlet [J/kg]
specific enthalpy of preheater outlet [J/kg]
specific enthalpy of saturated liquid [J/kg]
local specific enthalpy of test plate [J/kg]
superficial velocity [m/s]
thermal conductivity [W/(m K)]
distance between two thermocouples [m]
mass flow rate [kg/s]
saturation pressure (absolute) [Pa]
heat flux [W/m2]
heat flow [W]
temperature [ C]
plate wall temperature [ C]
wall superheat [K]
width of test plate channel [m]
vapor quality []
Dy
Greek symbols
d
height of test plate channel [m]
m
viscosity [Pa s]
r
density [kg/m3]
Subscripts
av
average
g
vapor
i
position of measuring point
in
inlet
l
liquid
loc
local
n
number of measuring point
out
outlet
pre
preheater
sat
saturation
sus
SUS304
test
test section
wall
wall
Dimensionless number
Bo
boiling number [] GHq fg
0:8 rg 0:5
Co
convection number [] 1x
x rl
2
Fr
Froude number with all flow [] r2GgD
h
l
l
Prandtl number of the liquid phase [] mlkCp
Prl
l
Reynolds number of the vapor phase []
Reg
(GxDh/mg)
Reynolds number of the liquid phase []
Rel
(G(1-x)Dh/ml)
Lockhart-Martinelli parameter for turbulent liquid
Xtt
and vapor phases []
361
2.
Experiment
2.1.
2.2.
Fig. 1 shows a schematic of the experimental apparatus consisting of a plate evaporator (test plate), condenser, and three
flow circuitsda warm water circuit, cold water circuit, and
working fluid circuit. A subcooled working fluid (ammonia,
approximately 8 K) is pumped up to a preheater using working
fluid pump (Teikoku Electric Mfg. Co., Ltd., reverse circulation
type canned motor pump, head 12 m, power 1.1 kW). The
working fluid is heated by the preheater (brazed plate heat
exchanger Tokyo Braze Co., Ltd.) to achieve the recommended
vapor quality at the test plate inlet. Then, the working fluid is
flown into the test plate, and the fluid exchanges heat with hot
water. As a result, the state of the working fluid changes from
liquid to a two-phase fluid. The two-phase fluid is transported
to an after-condenser and plate condenser, and then, it is
condensed into liquid using cold water. The condensed
working fluid is stored in a working fluid tank and transported
to the working fluid pump. Further, the hot and cold water are
generated by a gas boiler and refrigerator and stored in hot
and cold water tanks, respectively.
The working fluid temperature is measured using resistance thermometers (Hayashi Denko Co., Ltd., ER6, JIS A-class,
Test plate
362
2.3.
Visualization experiment
Fig. 4 show a cross section of the sight glass used for visualization. The sight glass is 45 mm in diameter. Visualized images
of the dotted square (having an area of 2500 mm2) are shown in
subsequent figures. Boiling phenomena occurring inside the
flow channels are observed using images captured using
a digital still camera (Pentax *istD); these images are captured
from outside the flow channels, as shown in Fig. 5. The camera
shutter speed is 1/4000 s. The light source is a 250 W cold lamp.
2.4.
The six TC wells, located along the center line of the test plate,
are used to measure the local heat flux.
T1 T2
l1
(1)
q$l2
ksus
(2)
A:
Working
fluid
T2
Twall
Hot
water
Urethan tube
l2
Plate
l1
T1
45
View area
q
q
(3)
Qpre
m
363
itest;1 itest;in
Q1
;
m
Q1 q1 A1
itest;n itest;n1
(5)
(4)
364
xn
itest;n isat;liq
ifg
n 1w6
(6)
3.
Experimental results
3.1.
Boiling curve
Fig. 7 shows the boiling curve (at Psat 0.7 MPa) with changes in
the mass flux and average heat flux. The local heat flux
increases linearly with increasing DTsat. This tendency was
observed in the pool boiling curve of ammonia (Arima et al.,
2003). However, change of the wall superheat temperature is
only 2 K against change of heat flux being 10 kW/m2. Therefore,
the effect of the wall superheat temperature is very small on the
heat flux. Furthermore, the local heat flux was not affected by
the mass flux in present study. Because each mass flux differences is small in itself and the result is close to the pool boiling
condition due to the very small mass flux for forced convection
experiment. The solid line and diamond plots in Fig. 7 show that
the experimental data of the boiling curve for the pool boiling of
ammonia by Arima et al. (2003). And the short and long dashed
line shows a pool boiling prediction, which is obtained by Eqs. (1)
and (3). Eq. (7) has been proposed by Stephan and Abdelsalam
(1980) and Nishikawa and Fujita (1977).
h Cqn
(7)
3.2.
3.2.1.
Fig. 8(a) and (b) show that plots of the measured local boiling
heat transfer coefficient hloc versus vapor quality x at various
Ammonia
2
7.5, 10, 15
15, 20, 25
0.7, 0.8, 0.9
13.9, 17.9, 21.6
0.1w0.4
mass fluxes; the average heat fluxes in these cases are 15 kW/
m2 and 20 kW/m2, respectively, and the saturation pressure in
both these cases remains constant at 0.70 MPa. In case of
x < 0.3, the local heat transfer coefficients remain almost
constant with increasing x. However, in case of 0.3 < x < 0.7,
that tend to increase with increasing x. In general, at the
forced convective boiling in a vertical tube, it is known that in
case of nucleate boiling region, wall superheat is constant
with increasing x and in case of forced convective heat
transfer through liquid film region (forced convective region),
the wall superheat is little decrease with increasing x (Tong
and Tang, 1997). Since change of the gradient of heat transfer
was observed bordering on x 0.3 as shown in Fig. 8.
However, regardless of the amount of mass flux, the local
boiling heat transfer coefficient remains almost constant for
a given vapor quality. Therefore, this tendency shows that an
increase in mass flux has almost no effect on the boiling heat
transfer coefficient. At the nucleate boiling region, it is
considered that the bubble which is generated in the heating
surface tends to stagnate into the narrow channel, although
heat transfer by the forced convection is performed. Because
these mass fluxes are small different and mass fluxes of
present study are lower than that of previous study. Therefore, it is considered that it depends for heat transfer on the
amount of bubbles emergence and heat transfer is not influenced by the mass flux. In addition, the boiling heat transfer
coefficient decreases rapidly with increasing x for x > 0.7 on
Fig. 8 (b). The range x > 0.7 implies the occurrence of a dry-out.
The same tendency is observed in Fig. 9(a).
3.2.2.
Fig. 9(a) and (b) show the plot of measured local boiling heat
transfer coefficient hloc versus vapor quality x at various
average heat fluxes; the mass fluxes in these cases are
7.5 kg/(m2 s) and 10 kg/(m2 s), respectively, and the saturation
pressure in both these cases remains constant at 0.70 MPa.
365
b
qav = 15 kW/m2
Pabs = 0.70 MPa
G = 7.4 kg/(m . s)
2
G = 10 kg/(m . s)
5
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
10
10
qav = 20 kW/m2
Pabs = 0.70 MPa
5
0.0
1.0
G = 7.5 kg/(m2 . s)
G = 10 kg/(m2 . s)
0.2
0.4
0.6
Quality x [-]
Quality x [-]
qav = 15 kW/m2
qav = 20 kW/m2
0.8
1.0
Fig. 8 Plot of local boiling heat transfer coefficient versus vapor quality at various mass fluxes.
G = 7.5 kg/(m2 . s)
Pabs = 0.70 MPa
0.2
10
G = 7.5 kg/(m2 . s)
Pabs = 0.70 MPa
5
0.0
3.2.4.
10
Fig. 10(a) and (b) show variations in the local boiling heat
transfer coefficient hloc with vapor quality x at a given saturation pressure. The local boiling heat transfer coefficient
tends to increase with increasing quality, as is the case whose
plot is shown in Fig. 9. In addition, the boiling heat transfer
coefficient decreases with increasing saturation pressure.
This is the cause of the increase in the wall superheat with
increasing saturation pressure. However, the local boiling
heat transfer coefficient decreases with increasing saturation
pressure at Psat 0.8 and 0.9 MPa at G 10.0 kg/m2 s, despite
the wall superheat being almost constant.
This result is the same as that obtained by Ishibashi and
Nishikawa (1969): under a slug and annular flow, the boiling
heat transfer coefficient decreases with increasing saturation
pressure at a constant heat flux.
3.2.3.
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
5
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
Quality x [-]
Quality x [-]
G = 7.5 kg/m2s
G = 10.0 kg/m2s
Fig. 9 Plot of local boiling heat transfer coefficient versus quality at various heat fluxes.
0.8
1.0
366
10
G = 7.5 kg/(m2 . s)
qav = 20 kW/m2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
10
5
0.0
1.0
G = 10.0 kg/(m2 . s)
qav = 20 kW/m2
0.2
0.4
0.6
Quality x [-]
Quality x [-]
G = 7.5 kg/m2s
G = 10.0 kg/m2s
0.8
1.0
Fig. 10 Variations in local boiling heat transfer coefficient with quality at various saturation pressures.
(11)
(12)
(13)
F 14:7;
F 15:43;
(14)
(15)
when j > jbs and jcb, Thus if jbs > jcb, j jbs. If jcb > jbs,
j jcb
where, constant F in Eqs. (14) and (15) is defined by Eqs. (16)
and (17).
(8)
jbs FBo0:5 exp 2:47Co0:15
Bo > 11 104
Bo < 11 104
(16)
(17)
3.3.
Nondimensional correlation
367
G = 7.4
G = 10
G = 7.4 (Kandlikar)
G = 10 (Kandlikar)
G = 7.4 (Shah)
G = 10 (Shah)
10
qav = 15 kW/m2
Pabs = 0.70 MPa
6
Arima
Shah
2
Kandlikar
b
Local heat transfer coefficient
hloc kW/(m2 . K)
Stephan
0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
qav = 20 kW/m
Pabs = 0.70 MPa
Arima
6
Nishikawa
Shah
2
Kandlikar
Stephan
0
0.0
1.0
G = 7.5
G = 10
G = 7.5 (Kandlikar)
G = 10 (Kandlikar)
G = 7.5 (Shah)
G = 10 (Shah)
10
0.2
0.4
0.6
Quality x [-]
Quality x [-]
qav = 15 kW/m2
qav = 20 kW/m2
0.8
1.0
Fig. 11 Comparisons of local boiling heat transfer coefficient between present and predicted data.
Xvv
!0:1
0:9 0:5
rg
ml
turbulent-turbulent
rl
mg
1x
x
!0:5
0:5 0:5
rg
1x
ml
laminar laminar
rl
mg
x
(19)
(20)
3.4.
Visualization
+25%
G=7.5
G=10
Experimental hloc /hLZ [-]
80
-25%
60
40
20
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
368
Fig. 14 Boiling flow patterns of ammonia at two different vapor qualities (G [ 10 kg/m2 s, Psat [ 0.7 MPa, qav [ 20 kW/m2)
3.4.1.
3.4.2.
Fig. 15(a) and (b) show visualization results at various mass fluxes
at a constant vapor quality, heat flux, and saturation pressure.
In the case of a low mass flux (Fig. 15(a)), some intermediate-size bubbles are observed over the entire area. On the
other hand, in the case of a high mass flux (Fig. 15(b)), the
liquid film that covers the entire visualized area is observed,
similar to the results shown in Fig. 15(b). The flow patterns
shown in Figs. 15(a) and (b) are different; however, the boiling
heat transfer coefficient for these patterns is almost the same.
Therefore, we conclude that the flow pattern does not
contribute to boiling heat transfer. As mentioned in Section
3.2, forced convection is dominant in the boiling heat transfer
under these conditions. This behavior is also confirmed in the
visualization experiment.
3.5.
Fig. 15 Boiling flow patterns at different mass fluxes (Psat [ 0.8 MPa, qav [ 20 kW/m2, x [ 0.4)
105
104
G=7.5
G=10
Annular
103
369
Whispy annular
102
Bubbly
100
10
Acknowledgement
Churn
101
Bubbly-slug
-1
10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 102 103 104 105 106
Superficial liquid momentum flux l jl2 [kg/ms2]
references
(22)
jg Gx=rg
(23)
Fig. 14(a) and (b) show that the flow patterns were bubble
and annular flow, respectively. However, Fig. 16 shows that all
data are in churn flow, because both momentum fluxes of
present data are very lower than that of general study in tube.
It is found that the vertical flow on plate could not be
expressed on this map for vertical tube. In the future, it is
necessary to examine the map of the vertical plate flow.
4.
Conclusion
The experimental results of the boiling heat transfer coefficients of pure ammonia under forced convective boiling in
a vertical flat plate are summarized as follows.
(1) The boiling curve in the case of a forced convective boiling
heat transfer shows that in such a heat transfer, the
surface wall superheat is 8 K less than that for a pool
boiling heat transfer. Therefore, it is concluded that in the
boiling heat transfer under the present experimental
conditions, forced convection is dominant.
(2) The forced convective boiling heat transfer coefficient of
ammonia increases with increasing vapor quality x at
a constant mass flux, saturation pressure, and average heat
flux. However, in the case of x > 0.7, a dry-out occurs occasionally, and therefore, boiling heat transfer decreases.
(3) An increase in mass flux has almost no effect on boiling heat
transfer. On the other hand, an increase in the heat flux and
saturation pressure cause a decrease in boiling heat transfer.
(4) An empirical correlation for the forced convective boiling heat
transfer coefficient is derived using the Lockhart-Martinelli
parameter. The boiling heat transfer coefficient estimated by
this correlation in the range of Xvv > 2 is in good agreement
with the measured boiling heat transfer coefficient.
Arima, H., Monde, M., Mitsutake, Y., 2003. Heat transfer in pool
boiling of ammonia/water mixture. Heat and Mass Transf. 39,
535543.
Hewitt, G.F., Roberts, D.N., 1969. Studies of Two-Phase Flow
Patterns by Simultaneous X-ray and Flash Photography. AEREM, HMSO, p. 2159.
Hsieh, Y.Y., Chiang, L.J., Lin, T.F., 2002. Subcooled flow boiling
heat transfer of r-134a and the associated bubble
characteristics in a vertical plate heat exchanger. Int. J. Heat
Mass Transf. 45 (No. 9), 17911806.
Inoue, T., Monde, M., Teruya, Y., 2002. Pool boiling heat transfer
in binary mixtures of ammonia water. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
45 (No. 22), 44094415.
Ishibashi, E., Nishikawa, K., 1969. Saturated boiling heat transfer
in narrow spaces. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 12 (No. 8), 863866.
Kandlikar, S., 1990. A general correlation for saturated two-phase
flow boiling heat transfer inside horizontal and vertical tubes.
Trans. ASME, J. Heat Transf. 112 (No. 1) 219218.
Kido, N., Yoneda, H., Suga, H., Uehara, H., Miyara, A., 1992.
Evaporation heat transfer and pressure drop of HCFC22 inside
a horizontal rectangular channel. 1st Report: smooth surface.
JSRAE Trans. 9 (No. 1), 3342 (in Japanese.
Kushibe, M., Ikegami, Y., Monde, M., Uehara, H., 2005.
Evaporation heat transfer of ammonia and pressure drop of
warm water for plate type evaporator. JSRAE Trans. 22 (No. 4),
403415 (in Japanese.
Mandrusiak, G.D., Carey, V.P., 1989. Convective boiling in vertical
channels with different offset strip fin geometries. Trans.
ASME J. Heat Transf. 111 (No. 1), 156165.
Nishikawa, K., 2000. Some considerations on the boiling heat
transfer of ammonia water mixtures. In: Proceeding of the
Mechanical Engineering Kyushu branch congress, vol. 53, pp.
115116 (in Japanese).
Nishikawa, K., Fujita, Y., 1977. On the Pressure Factor in Nucleate,
Boiling Heat Transfer. In: Memoirs of the Faculty of
Engineering, vol. 36. Kyushu University. No. 4 (in
Japanese)303341.
Developed and Distributed by PROPATHGroup, 2006. http://
www2.mech.nagasaki-u.ac.jp/PROPATH/p-propath.html.
Shah, M.M., 1982. Chart correlation for saturated boiling heat
transfer equations and further study. ASHRAE Trans. 88,
185196.
Stephan, K., Abdelsalam, M., 1980. Heat-transfer correlations for
natural convection boiling. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 23, 7387.
Tong, L.S., Tang, Y.S., 1997. Boiling Heat Transfer and Two-Phase
Flow, second ed. Taylor & Francis, pp. 245302.
Wen, M.-Y., Ho, C.-Y., 2005. Evaporation heat transfer and
pressure drop characteristics of R-290 (propane), R-600
370